How to Get the Municipal, City and County to Work Together on a Common GIS Platform John Auel – United Services Group Arlyn Lindsay – Marshall Municipal Utilities Brief History ► Marshall’s population is approximately 13,000 ► Utility is a separate entity, governance by a Commission appointed by the City Council ► City has a Engineering and Drafting Department ► Utility has a Mapping Department ► County has a GIS Department In the Beginning ► Discussed our plans with the City of Marshall ► Started with getting our GIS up and going ► Decided that Marshall Utilities and Lyon County needed to work together in a partnership Found out what direction they were planning on going Decided to work together to benefit the City and Utilities Decision to go with ESRI Decision to go with USG for electrical conversion The County has the GIS expertise All parties agreed that the City GIS should be coordinated with the County GIS program Leg Work ► Contacted ► Setup Lyon County for GIS support Data Sharing Agreements ► Looked for other parties interested in working with Marshall Utilities and Lyon County Formed a GIS Committee ► MMU ► City of Marshall ► Lyon County ► SMSU ► Public School Committee’s Goals ► Provide most current information ► Make information available to everyone, when they need it ► To reduce costs and redundant procedures ► To make tax and property information available to the public over the world wide web Committee’s Goals ► Decided to Share Resources Printers Scanners Fiber Network Offsite Storage Server Space and Equipment GPS Equipment Laserfiche Document Management System Software Examples of Partnership ► City and Utility share cost with Public School IT Department ► County plans to join agreement for one robust IT Department rather than many small departments ► City and Utility plan to help the County build up their GIS Department ► Shared cost for Pictometry ► Offsite backups for all entities ► Shared fiber network Getting Started ► Electrical conversion done by USG ► County needed to finish Lyon parcel data ► Signing up for GIS classes at SMSU Electrical Conversion ► Started with an AutoCAD drawing ► Exported to Shapefiles and imported to a personal geodatabase ► Overlay electrical feature classes on Lyon County parcels and road centerline layers ► Generated service points from County’s parcels, then matched to MMU billing information Things Coming Along ► Marshall Utilities Conversion Done New Map Books New Feeder Maps ► Lyon County Finished Parcel Data ► City of Marshall Has come on board and knows what they want Staying with AutoCAD and importing shapefiles from the County Why Partnership Became a Success ► Each group was at a point where they needed to move forward MMU Outdated maps Lyon County keeping up with the rest of the state on parcel data and internet mapping ► Lack of staff ► Lyon County offices are in Marshall, Minnesota Increases the amount of people working on GIS in Marshall and Lyon County Tips for Working Together ► Open communication, knowing what each group would like out of the partnership What makes the partnership look attractive? ► Starting out small and working into larger partnerships City departments Possibly going all the way to the state ► Convincing unwilling participants to jump into the GIS pool Finding advantages for these people Summary ► Marshall Utilities would not be able to use the powers of GIS with out the help of partnerships. ► More willing participants when costs are shared. ► Save time and money by reducing redundancy. ► Great way to expand on GIS expertise. ► Hopefully avoiding mistakes from learning from each other, in return less money spent.
© Copyright 2024