10/28/2004

10/28/2004
Content
ƒ
What is CRAS
ƒ
CRAS Business case
ƒ
History of the Group. First steps
ƒ
The FLIPA Project
ƒ
Some special features and open
issues
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
0
XBRL CRAS
•The purpose of the Credit Risk assessment Services, CRAS,
working group is to develop Credit risk assessment taxonomies
that will streamline the financial risk assessment work flow for
credit insurance, receivables management, factoring bonding,
rating, etc. The workflow is between the information consumer
and the information provider. The working group will start by
developing taxonomies for credit insurance risk assessment.
Specifically the working group will start by developing taxonomies
for the current set of United Nations compliant electronic
messages and data dictionaries developed for the credit insurance
risk assessment workflows.
Source: Credit Risk Assessment Services-Working Group
Charter 21/11/2002.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
1
1
10/28/2004
Content
ƒ
What is CRAS
ƒ
CRAS Business case
ƒ
History of the Group. First steps
ƒ
The FLIPA Project
ƒ
Some special features and open
issues
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
2
Information exchanges and Reporting perspectives
Customers
Customers
Credit
CreditInsurance
Insurance11
Customers
Customers
Customers
Customers
Investment
Investment
Analysts
Analysts
Customers
Customers
Credit
CreditInsurance
Insurance
22
Information
Information
Supplier
Supplier
Company
Company22
Company
Company11
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Other
OtherInfo
Info
Supplier
Supplier
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
ƒEvery ‘arrow’ is business
information.
Regulators
Regulators
Tax
Tax
Agencies
Agencies
Company
Company
Registry
Registry
Banks…
Banks…
Company
Company33
3
2
10/28/2004
USINESS REQUIREMENTS I
¾
Business case deals about dialogues request of product – answer back.
¾
There is a product catalogue to maintain (linked to business information).
¾
Standard to be built must be international, since dialogues are between companies of different
countries.
¾
There is not a regulator body for concept definitions. Industrial agreements must be used instead.
¾
Financial and non financial information share the same importance.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
¾
4
USINESS REQUIREMENTS II
¾
ast information is relevant.
¾
nside the same instance document, information about more than one entity is sent.
¾
ource of data and its qualifying date is relevant.
¾
here is a need of reusage of the same information structures in different parts of the report . (e.g.
Addresses, names).
¾
nformation is considered to be true in the moment the report is issued.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
¾
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
5
3
10/28/2004
CRAS is slightly different
Content
Application
•• CRAS
CRAS members
members reports
reports
information
information on
on other
other
companies
companies
•• XBRL
XBRL usually
usually used
used to
to report
report
financial
financial figures
figures about
about the
the
company
company
XBRL is
is usually
usually used
used to
to
•• XBRL
produce information
information
produce
•
CRAS
intends
to
develop
an
• CRAS intends to develop an
end-to-end application
application
end-to-end
including querying,
querying,
including
answering modes,…
modes,…
answering
XBRL
CRAS
The need
need to
to use
use standard
standard
•• The
semantic terms
terms through
through
semantic
code lists
lists is
is specific
specific to
to
code
XBRL-CRAS
XBRL-CRAS
•• XBRL
XBRL allows
allows the
the use
use of
of
code list
list –– no
no technical
technical
code
difficulty.
difficulty.
•• Phase
Phase 11 will
will recycle
recycle the
the
existing
existing business
business
requirements
which
makes
requirements which makes
CRAS
CRAS quickly
quickly ready
ready to
to start
start
technical
technical implementation
implementation
Business semantic & Code Lists
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
Business Requirements
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
6
Content
ƒ
What is CRAS
ƒ
CRAS Business case
ƒ
History of the Group. First steps
ƒ
The FLIPA Project
ƒ
Some special features and open
issues
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
7
4
10/28/2004
XBRL CRAS history
¾
Steering committee in Levallois-Perret – FR: key decision making
meeting
¾
Meeting in Vienna: detailed project plan: task list, workloads and
staff allocation to business, technical and liaison activities
¾
Meeting in Madrid: formal governance structure and project
organization is approved
1st XBRL-CRAS meeting
¾
Meeting in Paris: working group starts its activities under XBRL
International umbrella
Dec 02
ICISA Business case
¾
“The XML way forward” - GREFIS / ICISA XBRL justification- NovDec/12/2002
Nov 02
XBRL-CRAS chartered
¾
Oct 02
XBRL-CRAS SOI
Sep 02
ICISA Project launch
Jul 03
1st XBRL-CRAS Steering
3rd XBRL-CRAS meeting
Jun 03
May 03
2nd XBRL-CRAS meeting
Apr 03
Mar 03
Feb 03
Jan 03
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
“XBRL-CRAS group” approved by XBRL International for our
industry (CREDIT RISK ASSESSMENT SERVICES)
¾ “Statement Of Interest” approved by XBRL International Steering
Committee
¾
ICISA launches an industry project to implement XBRL and replace
the existing EDI conventional workflow & the industry business
case is issued (documentation available)
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
8
Where are we?
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
9
5
10/28/2004
Who are we?
XBRL-Int’l
XBRL-CRAS working group
Credit Risk Assessment Services
FLIPA Taxonomy
Credit Insurance
Business Info.
suppliers
Other projects
welcomed!
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
10
Content
ƒ
What is CRAS
ƒ
CRAS Business case
ƒ
History of the Group. First steps
ƒ
The FLIPA Project
ƒ
Some special features and open
issues
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
11
6
10/28/2004
Introduction
FLIPA PROJECT
PROJECT
FLIPA
XBRL-CRAS
XBRL-CRAS
XBRL
ƒ
FLIPA Goals:
¾ To define a transactional environment (end-to-end application including querying,
answering modes, …) where the information interchange is made.
¾ To define the XBRL report.
ƒ
Main Activities:
¾ Identify Business Requirements
¾ Develop XBRL-CRAS Taxonomy
¾ Define non-XBRL components: technical infrastructure (going on)
¾ Test and implement
ƒ
Organization:
Technical Working Group
Project Management
Technical Deliverables
& Action Plan
Business Working Group
Business Deliverables
& Action Plan
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
12
The project is organized in competence areas:
- to deliver the key results expected from the different workstreams
- to ensure right level of project governance, monitoring & coordination
- to establish communication to the external world.
Responsibilities of each project are detailed in appendix
W. VROLIJK – GERLING NCM NL
F. PEDRANZINI – D&B
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
13
7
10/28/2004
The Project team recommends a phased approach focusing on the content of BUSCRDCRC = first CRAS e-report, and to extend in 2004 with additional content items and
services
IDEINQ
IDEANS
CREINQ
CREANS
CREICI
CREICA
ICISA subsets
Current
EDI
messages
IDEINQ
CREINQ
CREICI
IDEANS
CREANS
CREICA
BUSCRD subsets
Current
EDI
framework
CRE
CRC
FSD
OOR
EIS
service
…
ƒ Taxonomy based on BUSCRD-CRC
¾Company Information
¾Related entities
¾Rating
¾Key Financials,…
ƒ Not A product BUT a set of components
Specific
extensions
ƒ Technical layer allowing integration in
each environment to allow end-to-end
application
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
Credit Report btw Credit Ins.
Credit Report from Info Prov.
EIS: Entity Identification Search
CRE: Credit Report from C. Ins.
CRC: Credit Report from Info. Prov.
OOR: Credit Opinion Only
FSD: Financial Statement Data
Phase I (12/2004)
XBRL
CRAS
Taxonomies
Entity Identification Search
Phase II (tbd)
ƒ Services
¾Address searching
¾Monitoring service
¾Reminder
¾…
ƒ New business contents
ƒ Integration of new taxonomies
ƒ Extension of XBRL users community
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
14
Flexibility for Eurogate members and their customers
Message
information
non-XBRL
Message
information
non-XBRL
e-Report over XBRL
Sender,
Envelope
Product,
header
...
...
Related
entities
Entity
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
Key
Credit
Business
Negative
financial
recomme
rating
events
figures
ndation
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
Envelope
trailer
…
15
8
10/28/2004
The message structure
Message
information
non-XBRL
Message
information
non-XBRL
e-Report over XBRL
Sender,
Envelope
Product,
header
...
...
Related
entities
Entity
Key
Credit
Business
Negative
financial
recomme
rating
events
figures
ndation
Eurogate XBRL
extension
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
…
Credit
Business
Payment Protested
recomme
rating
Experience
bills
ndation
Entity
-
Envelope
trailer
Real
…
estate
Informa XBRL
Extension
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
16
In order to develop the end-to-end pilot product,
the project team has identified the following workstreams to be performed…
WS 0
Project Office
and Steering
preparation
Project Office,
WS 1
Project
Management and
Liaison team
Budget and resource definition,
WS 2
Business
Requirements
WS 3
XBRL Taxonomy
development
ƒ CRAS
Chairmanship
ƒ WG project
management
ƒ TWG Project
Management
ƒ Project
Management
ƒ Finalize Business
Requirements
ƒ Taxonomy design
strategy
ƒ Project reporting
ƒ Design conceptual
samples
ƒ Data Model
ƒ Champion CRAS
cause
ƒ Taxonomy
certification
ƒ Validation Rules
ƒ Taxonomy
Implementation
ƒ Sign-off code lists
ƒ Testing
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Planning,
Implementation Road map.
WS 4
Non-XBRL
components
ƒ Technical Layer
ƒ Transaction
Infrastructure
definition
WS 5
Pilot testing
&
Implementation
ƒ Pilot testing
coordination
ƒ Infrastructure SetUp
ƒ Product and service
handling
ƒ Interoperability
testing
ƒ Testing
ƒ Validation and signoff
ƒ Quality Assurance
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
17
9
10/28/2004
… and proposed the following planning to have the pilot application
Man/days
Internal External
WS 0
Feb
Project office and
steering preparation
20
20
WS 1
Jan
Project Management
and Liaison activities
35
50
WS 2
Dec
Business Requirements
81
0
WS 3
Nov
XBRL Taxonomy
development
90
52
WS 4
Oct
Non-XBRL components
40
0
WS 5
Sep
E-report testing
/
0
266
122
Testing not included as dependant on company specific infrastructure
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
18
Content
ƒ
What is CRAS
ƒ
CRAS Business case
ƒ
History of the Group. First steps
ƒ
The FLIPA Project
ƒ
Some special features and open
issues
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
19
10
10/28/2004
Flipa Taxonomy. Content Model
Main Content Model Areas
Sample Diagram
Activity
Business Agency
Entity
Name Details
Identifier
Address
Legal Form
Name Details
Identifier
Address
Risk Assessment
Financial Statements
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
Credit Recommendation
Rating
Score
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
20
Flipa Taxonomy. From Content Model to
XBRL 2.1 Design
Tuple Design Rules
ƒ
Using Tuples to express information concepts that can not appear
disaggregated (i.e. Manager, Activity)
ƒ
Nested Tuples to reuse information (i.e Identifier, Address, Name
Details...)
ƒ
Financial Statements defined as Global Items (not Tuples) to be able to
create calculation networks of this information.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
21
11
10/28/2004
Flipa Taxonomy. From Content Model to
XBRL 2.1 Design (2)
Presentation Roles Design Rules
ƒ
The Presentation Linkbase is the main guideline to create product view
containers
ƒ
Creation of custom products based on information building blocks
selecting parts from the content model
i.e to create a product called Negative Information just define a new
presentation extended link role that selects the tuples Entity (and the children
Identifier, Address, Name Details) plus the tuple Negative Information.
ƒ
These definition products will not be part of the FLIPA taxonomy unless
required by BWG. This feature can easily be implemented through
extension taxonomies.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
22
Flipa Taxonomy. From Content Model to
XBRL 2.1 Design (3)
Extensible code List definition
Two related taxonomies FLIPA (Core) and FLIPA-Datatypes
FLIPA
FLIPACORE
CORE
FLIPA-Datatypes
FLIPA-Datatypes
FLIPA-ES
FLIPA-ES
FLIPA-FR
FLIPA-FR
List
ListExtension
Extension
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
Local
LocalList
ListExtension
Extension
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
FLIPA-IT
FLIPA-IT
Local
LocalExtension¿?
Extension¿?
23
12
10/28/2004
Flipa Taxonomy. From Content Model to
XBRL 2.1 Design (3)
Extensible code List definition
FLIPA CORE Design for code list elements
1st: define the datatype of the code: LegalFormCodeItemType (for
example an extension of XBRLStringItemType)
2nd: The list of possible codes is defined as a tuple with a choice (not
sequence) of 1 element between several ones:
i.e: LegalFormType -> tuple -> choice
3rd: This list (tuple) is defined in The FLIPA CORE without any real
codeValue, only as the skeleton or structure of this code datatype
(using ONE Abstract element as unique Children i.e:
LegalFormItemHead)
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
24
Flipa Taxonomy. From Content Model to
XBRL 2.1 Design (3)
Extensible code List definition
FLIPA-Datatypes as an extension taxonomy of Flipa CORE:
1st: replace every undetermined code value of the list with real values
(items) i.e: LegalForm-49 (Limited PartnerShip) as the substitution of
LegalFormItemHead
2nd: Taxonomy can define any language literal through the label
linkbase and may define precisely the code list being expressed
through the reference linkbase.
3rd: It does not modify the datatype structure (LegalFormType is not
redefined, only the range of possible values)
4th: The XBRL Mapping between items is enforced through the
definition linkbase using the arc-role general-special
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
25
13
10/28/2004
Flipa Taxonomy.
Use Case: Expressing relationships between Tuples
Conclusions
ƒ
Benefits of opening the information model reported through relationships
between data (mainly for Entity Information)
ƒ
Integrity validation: Reducing the complexity of consuming systems and
applications using standard XML validation mechanisms.
ƒ
Flexibility to report information of several related companies in the same
document.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
26
Flipa Taxonomy.
Open Issues
Summary of open issues
Historical Information
ƒ
¾
¾
¾
Need to express old data (old name of a company, ancient address, ancient
legal forms, etc…)
Need to express the source of an specific fact.
Need to indicate two dates attached to a fact: (Date when the information
became true, Date of source). These dates can not be expressed in context
container.
ƒ
Internationalization (i18n). As soon as the taxonomy would get adopted it
would be added the translated literals of the label linkbase.
ƒ
Reference. The concepts reported need to be uniquely identified based on
the reference linkbase, that has to be reviewed to included this pointers to
the current literature.
ƒ
Local Extension, taxonomy versioning and interoperation.
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
27
14
10/28/2004
Who made it?
The sponsors: FLIPA Steering committee
From left to right:
M. Morin (Eurogate - Coface) – France
M. Inami (Teikoku DataBank - Japan)
M. Pedranzini (D&B Europe - FLIPA Business Working Group Ch
M. Hernadez (Iberinform - Spain)
M. Vaingnedroye (Bignet - Coface ORT - France)
M. Nijhout (ICISA – The Netherlands)
M. Buckenberger (Febis - Bürgel)
M. Bouix (Coface - France)
M. Watanabe (Tokyo Shoko Research)
M. Bert (Atradius – FLIPA Project Director - XBRL-CRAS Chair)
M. Arnaiz (CESCE – Spain – FLIPA Technical working group chai
M. Tesniere (PWC - France)
M. Richter (Creditreform - Germany)
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
28
Who made it? The team members
Project Management
¾
¾
Atradius
PWC
BERT Vincent
Business Working Group - BWG
(Chairman)
(Assistant)
Technical Working Group - TWG
¾
D&B
PEDRANZINI Fabio (vice chair)
¾
¾
CESCE
INFORMA
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
COFACE
COFACE SCRL
CREDITREFORM
EULER HERMES
EXPERIAN
Atradius
IBERINFORM
LINCE
HENRIET Benoit
PERREON-SIMONOT Richard
RICHTER Thomas
CAMPO DIAZ
MORRIS Oliver
DIRKS Gregor
OHLSSON ALBEA Andrès
MILOVIC Milovan
PARIBELLI Giovanni
ROHLFS Holger
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
BÜRGEL
COFACE
CREDITO Y CAUCION
EULER HERMES
Atradius
MAPFRE
COFACE-ORT
¾
UBMatrix
¾
SOFTWARE AG
¾
TSR
PPA
Liaison team – L. Team
¾
¾
Atradius
Global E-Commerce
ARNAIZ Mariano (Chairman)
FERNANDEZ Carlos (vice chair)
GÖBEL Peter-Jörg
de RIVOYRE Christophe
GONZALEZ DE HERDIA J.
SELLERBERG Klaus
BENLYAZID Karim
MONREAL Sergio
BAILLEUX Dominique
CHAMPAULT Régis
SCOTT STROKEs David
VAN EGMOND Raynier
NAVARRO Pablo
¾HERNANDEZ Ignacio
WATANABE Eiichi
BERT Vincent (Chairman)
RUDIE Donald
DIGITAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH CONFERENCE
-
OCTOBER 14-15, 2004
29
15