“Doctor, why does my skin turn yellow?” Dr. Wong Yuet Lin Dr Lin, Elaine Department of Medicine and Geriatrics United Christian Hospital F/75 Madam LSC o o o o o o o P Premorbid bid community dwelling elderly stick walker independent activity of daily living Social history widow, living with son in public housing estate attending day care center six times per week illiterate worked as amah, retired in 1991 Good G d evening, i doctors…… Past medical history and Medications o o o o o o o o o o o o o P t Medical Past M di l History Hi t hypertension diabetes mellutis hyperlipidaemia yp p old ischemic stroke with good recovery 2005 - CT brain : right brainstem infarct - EMS 20, MFAC 6, BBS 35 OA knee thyroid abscess (2000) bereavement (2000) - psychiatric assessment : MMSE 17, poor attention during test f ld t ti off hist ti - no formal documentation history off d dementia bilateral hearing loss refuse hearing aids Medication before admission aspirin 80mg daily adalat retard 40mg bd zocor 5mg nocte metformin 750mg tds amaryl 4mg om Admission to surgical ward (20 Jan 2010)…… o o o o o o o o o o o o History sudden onset of yellowing of skin for few days, noted by day care center nurse self lf noted t d ttea color l urine i and d pale l stool t l no right upper quadrant pain no fever/chills/rigor no recent weight loss denied history of herbs, over-the-counter medication or health supplement no travel history Physical examination deep jaundice hepatomegaly 4cm below right costal margin no stigmata of chronic liver disease orientated, no sign of hepatic encephalopathy vital signs stable Blood test results after admission…… Before admission On admission to surgical ward ( 20 Jan 2010 ) After admission ( 21 Jan 2010 ) Bil 8 190 243 ALT/AST 11/-- 840/1079 1032/-- ALP/GGT 59/-- 220/155 207/-- INR -- 1.4 1.3 Albumin 43 31 25 Hb 11.7 9.8 10.7 Platelet 340 209 317 WCC 83 8.3 76 7.6 62 6.2 Ur/Cr 4.4/76 11/150 3.9/93 Na 145 135 137 K 43 4.3 42 4.2 41 4.1 One day after admission (21 Jan 10)…… o o o Bedside ultrasound abdomen by surgical colleagues gallbladder wall thickened, not distended pr minent intra-hepatic prominent intra hepatic ducts, ducts c common mm n bile duct 1cm no stone LFT static Afebrile, Vital sign stable OGD arranged : chronic duodenal ulcer at D1, acute gastritis Hypoglycemia noted : metformin/amaryl off Take over to medical team two days after admission (22 Jan 2010)…… Constrast CT abdomen : no mass, no biliary obstruction Medical team was consulted for management of acute hepatitis o o o o Patient was assessed at 4pm deep jaundice, hepatomegaly 4cm below right costal margin Hstix 19.8 after OHA off, subcutaneous actrapid was given Vital signs stable, afebrile orientated, cheerful, relevant speech, communicable with hearing aids Patient : doctor, why does my skin turn yellow ? D t : it’s Doctor it’ because b there th is i some problem bl with ith your liver, li we will transfer you to our unit for further management. Patient : I understand, thanks doctor. Patient was transferred to medical ward at 5pm o o o Notes written by medical nursing staff transfer in from surgical g ward,, reason for transfer explained p to son vital sign stable, afebrile, Hstix recheck 12 orientated, went to toilet with son’s accompany Something happened at that night…… night Midnight of 23 Jan 10 Nursing notes o o o o o 2am : patient tried tto climb from fr m bed GCS 14/15, disorientated to time and place, confused speech, safety vest applied on call medical officer informed, patient assessed, vital sign stable, blood test ordered 4am : patient used her knife to cut the safety vest, agitated security guard called, patient was put on physical restrainer What happen? What’s the diagnosis? Hepatic encephalopathy? Undocumented history of dementia with BPSD? Acute stroke? Delirium? Morning round at 23 Jan 10 (three days after admission )…… Patient on physical restrain disorientated, confused speech, inattention, not agitated, occassionally could follow one step command, four limbs power around 4 Refuse breakfast, Hstix 6 Fever up to 38 degree, urine stix positive Found acute retention of urine (400ml) Bowel opening daily Psychiatric notes in 2000 reviewed - illiterate, work as amah, retired in 1991 - personality : introverted, few friends, dependent on husband, anxiety prone - low mood after husband’s death - MMSE 17 ( 3,3,3,1,2,2,1,2,0,0,0 ), poor concentration during test - diagnosis : bereavement - plan : counseling given, follow up prn Son contacted via phone and premorbid cognitive state reviewed Underlying dementia? MCI? - poor memory for one year - orientation good - no history off d delusion or h hallucination hi l i ll i i - no depressive or irritable mood, no reverse sleep cycle - no history of fall, hygiene good Investigation result after confusion…….. Before admission Admission ( 20 Jan 2010 ) After admission ( 21 Jan 2010 ) After confusion (23 Jan 10 ) 25 Jan 10 Bil 8 190 243 244 250 ALT/AST 11/-- 840/107 9 1032/-- 844/713 553/-- ALP/GGT 59/ 59/-- 220/15 5 207/ 207/-- 194/ 194/-- 181/ 181/-- INR -- 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 Albumin 43 31 25 27 28 Hb 11.7 9.8 10.7 10.0 10.1 Platelet 340 209 317 313 373 WCC 8.3 7.6 6.2 8.2 12.1 Ur/Cr 4.4/76 11/150 3.9/93 5.2/124 5.8/11 6 Na 145 135 137 135 138 K 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.2 ammonia level normal Urgent CT brain : small vessels disease, bilateral lacunar infarct MSU : wcc scanty, no growth Blood culture : negative MMSE 2000 orientation registration Calculation C l l i and d attention Recall Language Visual construction T t l marks Total k (poor attention) After confusion 3,3 3 3 3 1 0,0 0 0 2 0 2 2,1 2,0,0,0 2 2,1 1,0,1,0 17 9 Diagnosis and Plan o o o o o o o o o Provisional Diagnosis Delirium Acute hepatitis ?Urinary ? r nary tract infection nf ct on ?f ?feverr due u to acut acute h hepatitis pat t s ?Underlying dementia ?MCI Plan put on zinacef sit out, avoid physical restrain physiotherapy referred for early mobilization encourage oral intake, dietician referred Whyy does this ladyy developp delirium? Can this be prevented ? Should we start haloperidol? What will be her prognosis? What her acute Wh t is the th cause s of fh t hepatitis? h titis? Progress in subsequent days…… o o o o o o o o o o o 24 Jan 10 morning round (one days after acute confusion)…… confusion) fragmented sleep last night sit out while assessment, still disorientation, poor attention, confused speech fever persist, vital sign stable finish 1/3 breakfast Physiotherapist/Occupational therapist : power 4/5 over four limbs, transfer barely independent, walk with stick with mild assistance, EMS 7, MFAC 4, BI 64 25 Jan 10 morning round (two days after acute confusion)…… confusion) sleep well last night still disorientated but decreased confused speech, attention improved keep on PT/OT training 26 Jan 10 morning round (three days after acute confusion)…… orientated, cooperative, no more confused speech finished whole bowel of congee 350ml during breakfast stick walker under supervision, increased stability Patient was transferred to convalescence hospital for further rehabilitation and monitoring of liver function at 28 Jan 10……. 10 B f Before reviewing i in p patient ti nt’ss progress p ss Let’s have a discussion of today’s topic……… Delirium - Review Why do Wh d patients ti t d develop l delirium? • Concept C t off delirium d li i • DSM-IV criteria • Pathophysiology of delirium • Risk Ri k factor f model d l for f development d l off d delirium li i Concept of delirium Phenomenon of delirium first recognized as early as first century CE by Celsus Clear description of this term : Hippocrate’s writing 2500 ago DSM-IV-TR DSM IV TR criteria : most commonly used gold standard nowaday Acute mental disorder : acute onset, daily fluctuating course, inattention and other cognitive impairment Accompany by presence of acute medical illness Diagnosis g of delirium according g to DSM-IV-TR criteria All four criteria (A-D) are required to confirm a diagnosis of d li i delirium General diagnostic g criteria (A-C) (A) Disturbance of consciousness (that is, reduced clarity of awareness of the environment) with reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention (B) A change in cognition (such as memory deficit, disorientation, language disturbance) or the development of a perceptual disturbance that is not better accounted for by a pre-existing, t bli h d or evolving l i d ti established, dementia (C) The disturbance develops over a short period of time (usually hours to days) and tends to fluctuate during the course of the day *Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR®) American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc., Arlington, VA) DSM-IV classification of causes of delirium Criteria D o o o o For delirium due to a general medical condition (D) Evidence from the history, physical examination, or laboratory findings indicates that the disturbance is caused by the direct physiological consequences of a general medical condition F substance For b intoxication i i i d delirium li i (D) Evidence from the history, physical examination, or laboratory findings indicates that of either (1) the symptoms in Criteria A and B developed during substance intoxication, or (2) medication use is etiologically related to the disturbance For substance withdrawal delirium (D) History, physical examination, or laboratory findings indicate that the symptoms in Criteria A and B developed during, or shortly after, a withdrawal syndrome For delirium due to multiple etiologies commonly seen in elderly (D) History, History physical examination examination, or laboratory findings indicate that the delirium has more than one etiology (for example, more than one etiological general medical condition, a general medical condition plus substance intoxication or medication side effect) Pathophysiology N t fully Not f ll understood, nd t d lik likely l to t b be complex mpl x o o o o Neurotransmitter imbalance cholinergic g deficiency y elevated brain dopaminergic fucntion relative imbalance between the dopaminergic and cholinergic system glutamate, beta-aminobutyric acid, serotonin, norepinephrine Different mechanisms may occur in different acute illnesses Metabolic or ischemic insult (hypoxemia,hypoglycemia) : impaired th i and d release l f neurotransmitters t itt synthesis of Trauma/infection/surgery : release of proinflammatory cytokines -> activate microglia in brain -> affect neurotransmitter synthesis/release High level of cortisol : elderly has impairment in feedback regulation of cortisol, predispose to delirium Risk factor model Multifactorial : complex interaction between predisposing and precipitating factors o o Relation between y and degree g of vulnerability insult patient with high vulnerability develop delirium even with mild degree of insult P ti t with ith llow vulnerability l bilit resistant i t t Patient to delirium even with noxious insult Elderly y patient p : vulnerability high g Risk factors associated with delirium o o o • Old age • Possible underlying cognitive impairment • Hypoglycemia/Hyperglycemia Predisposing • Anemia “Key” for successful • Low albumin Age > 65 • Acute liver failure management Male sex • Infection ( ?urinary tract infection ) addressing and manage all the risk Dementia or other cognitive • Immobilization device : foley insertion, impairment physical factors restrains or Visual impairment • Environmental factors : change Hearing of ward/staff “Individualized” Individualized What are the possible risk factors for our patient? Infection Electrolyte disturbance Metabolic disturbance : base, glucose disturbance, thyroid function acid- adrenal or Functional dependence Organ failure - acute renal or liver failure - respiratory i or cardiac di failure f il Acute stroke History of falls or fracture hip Anemia Alcohol abuse Malnutrition or low albumin P h ti drugs d Psychoactive D ithd l or intoxication i t i ti Drug withdrawal Polypharmacy High number of hospital procedure Multiple physical illness Immobilization device Chronic renal or liver failure Environmental factors History of stroke or neurological disease Psyc Psychological factors Terminal T i l illness ill Prolong sleep deprivation P l l d i i Definitely our patient is at high risk……… different patients /clinical setting -> different risk factors search carefully with clinical sensibility in each case Precipitating Development of delirium Risk factor model - vulnerability ( predisposing factors) - degree of insults (major causes and precipitating factors of delirium ) Pathophysiology ( different diff r nt m mechanisms ch nisms in different acute illnesses ) Diagnosis according To DSM-IV criteria Why delirium is important? •Commonness C •Under-recognition •Adverse outcomes •Persistent P i delirium d li i •Delirium progress to dementia? Commonness “Prevalent” delirium : on admission (14-24%) * no consensus on definition of time interval : definition of within 36/48/72 hours “Incidence” delirium : develop during hospital stay (6-56%) * high incidence delirium due to poor screening of prevalence delirium on admission o o o o o o o o o Common in different clinical settings Community 1-2% Hospital elderly 14-56% General medical 15-50% Postoperative patient 15-53% Hip fracture 43-61% ICU 70 70-87% 87% Palliative care 83% Nursing Home or Post acute care setting 50% Emergency department 30% U d Under-recognition i i Under detection rate 32-67% o o o o o o Reasons for under-recognition under recognition non-specific presentation, daily fluctuating -> lucid period pitfall for diagnosis a low-status medical presentation, not require extra resources not a medical problem, consider it as psychiatry problem multiple etiology different from the classic “myth” of “one man one disease ” hypoactive delirium Common in patients with previous cognitive impairment -> masking effect Screening tools to improve detection rate? Still not commonly used in most health care setting….. Adverse outcomes Independent risk factors for poor outcomes * Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients : a systematic literature review. Age and ageing 2006, 35:350-364. Siddiqi N, House AO, Holmes JD. - Results of outcomes in 19 study cohorts - delirium associated with increase mortality at 12 months, increase length of hospital stay and institutionalizations o o o o o o o Hospital complications (aspiration, pressure sore, incontinence, acute retention of urine, decrease oral intake pulmonary embolism) Functional and cognitive decline, loss of independence Prolong length of hospital stay Psychological impact to families Increase post discharge health care support Institutionalization One year mortality rate 35-40% 35 40% Persistent delirium Traditional belief : reversible and transient Recent studies : delirium persist much longer than believed o o o * Persistent delirium in older hospital patients : a systematic review of frequency and prognosis. Age and Ageing 2009, 38:19-26. Cole MG, Ciampi A, Belzile E, et al. 18 studies reviewed combined proportions with persistent delirium at discharge, 1,3 and 6 months were 44.7%, 32.8%, 25.6% and 21% outcomes ( mortality, nursing home placement, function, cognition ) are poorer in patients with persistent delirium Risk factors associated with persistent delirium identified * Risk factors for delirium at discharge : Development and Validation of a predicitive model. o o o o o o Arch Intern Med, 2007, Vol 167(No.13):1406-1413. Ionuye SK, Zhang Y, Jones RN, et al. Five independent p risk factors identified : dementia (OR 2.3) vision impairment (OR2.1) functional impairment (OR1.7) high comorbidity (OR1 (OR1.7) 7) use of physical restrain(OR3.2) Delirium progress to dementia? Relationship remains unclear : a spectrum of cognitive disorder? ( both associated with cholinergic deficiency, inflammatiion ) Dementia : strongest risk factor associated with delirium Permanent cognitive and functional decline after an episode of delirium reported in some cases Delirium commoner in patients with incipient dementia? * Delirium episode as a sign : a 2 year follow up p g of undetected dementia among g community y dwelling g elderly y subjects j y p study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 2000, 69, 519-521. Rahkonen T, Paanila S, Sivenius J. Poor outcome for patients with delirium superimposed on dementia : accelerate rate of progression of dementia and poorer outcome than those without delirium * Consequences of not recognizing delirium superimposed on dementia in hospitalized elderly individuals. J. Gerontol. Nurs, 2000, 26, 30-40. Fick D, Foreman M Whatt is Wh i the th clinical li i l feature f t of delirium • Core C features f t • Subtypes • Subsyndromal delirium • Severity S i Core features o o o o o o o o Acute onset with daily fluctuating course Disturbance in attention Disorganized thinking Altered level of consciousness e e.g. g viligant viligant, lethargy Disorientation Memory impairment Perceptual disturbance Psychomotor agitation and retardation Sleep-wake cycle disturbance A h : Approach o o establish Baseline cognitive function, any recent change Severity of delirium : relationships with outcome? many tools for assess severity : Memorial M i lD Delirium li i Assessment A S Scale l (MDAS) (MDAS), D Delirium li i I Index(DI), d (DI) D Delirium li i Assessment Scale (DAS), Delirium Rating Scales-revised version (DRS-R-98) largely used in clinic research, may have role in clinical practice Subtypes first described by Lipowski (1990) : refer to psychomotor activity or level of arousal o o o Three subtypes Hyperactive : hallucination, delusion, agitation, restlessness, hypervigilance Hypoactive : lethargy, lethargy sedation sedation, respond slowly to questioning Mixed : fluctuate between hyperactive and hypoactive form Hypoactive delirium : yp significant higher rate at people age over 65 Lack of consensus on classification of subtype of delirium : barrier to research Different pathophysiology, causes, prognosis and responses to treatment? Subsyndromal delirium o o No consensus of definition not meet DSM-IV criteria but exhibit few core features of delirium some exhibit hibit prodromal d l symptoms t : restlessness, tl anxiety, i t iirritability, it bilit di distractibility, t tibilit sleep disturbance may y progress p g to full-blown delirium over 1-3 days y Some report similar worse outcomes to those with mild delirium *The prognostic significance of subsyndromal delirium in elderly medical inpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003 June, 51(6) :754-60. Cole M, McCUsker J, Dendukuri N, Han L Need close monitoring in this group of patient? Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) Most commonly used perform with formal cognitive testing Reliable when used by trained interviewer : sensitivity 94-100%, specificity 90-95%, high inter-rater reliability CAM Algorithm ( presence of 1+2 and either 4 ) 11. 2. 3. 4. Acute onset + fluctuating course Inattention Disorganized thinking Altered level of consciousness * Clarifying confusion : the confusion assessment method : A new method for detection of delirium Annals of Internal Medicine. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI Routine screening needed? Mode of screening? Which screening test? Who should be screened? Table 2 Tools for the assessment of delirium Fong TG et al. (2009) Delirium in elderly adults: diagnosis, prevention and treatment Nat Rev Neurol doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.24 Is there any y effective treatment for delirium? • Non-pharmacological N h l i l • Pharmacological treatment • Prevention G General l principals i i l Multi-disciplinary approach Identification and treatment of the etiological causes Addressing all the precipitating and modifiable risk factors Treating the behavior symptoms Preventing complications Maintaining function and independence Counseling to their care-giver care giver and relative Non-pharmacological treatment “ First-line” treatment, Nursing care based……… sensory n imp impairment i m nt (spectacles, ( l h hearing aids) d ) nutrition, hydration and electrolytes disturbance avoid faecal impaction, watch out for acute retention of urine orientation i t ti programme (reorientation, clear instructions, frequent eye contact, clock, calendars) avoid Physical retrain (decrease mobility, increased agitation/injury, prolongation of delirium) early mobilization d noise at night h time quiet patient-care setting, avoid low-level lighting at night, bright light at daytime avoid sleep deprivation limiting room and staff changes environment modification to minimize risk of injury Evidence to support a multi-disciplinary approach? Three systematic reviews performed and only two randomized control trial identified * Systematic S t ti detection d t ti and d multidisciplinary ltidi i li care of f d delirium li i iin older ld medical di l iinpatients: ti t a randomized d i d ttrial. i l Cole C l MG, McCusker J, Bellavance F, Primeau FJ, Bailey RF, Bonnycastle MJ, and Laplante J. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2002. 167(7): p. 753-759.ole et al (2002) [100] * Systematic intervention for elderly inpatients with delirium: a randomized trial. Cole MG, Primeau FJ, Bailey RF, Bonnycastle MJ, Masciarelli F, Engelsmann F, Pepin MJ, and Ducic D,. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1994. 151(7): p 965 p. 965-70 70 (1994) [53] o o o o received consultations by a geriatrician/geriatric psychiatrist and treatment recommendations daily visits by a liaison nurse to ensure adherence to intervention unable to demonstrate a significant difference between the two group a cross contamination effect, general standard of care (control group) was high, study was underpowered Ph Pharmacological l i l treatment o o o o o Indications severe behavioral or emotional disturbance e.g. interfering with sleep-wake cycle, anxiety, fear and hallucinations threatens own or others safety interfere with essential medical or nursing care ensure medical causes for agitation treated e.g. pain, constipation, urinary retension, hypoxia other non-pharmacological measures failed to ease the symptoms Aim o o o o : alert and manageable patients When start treatment commence at lowest dose, shortest duration, titrate against level of agitation clear documentation : dose,, frequency, q y, route,, side effects close monitoring of vital signs, mental state by nursing staff review regularly by physicians : drug use to treat delirium can increase confusion or lead to over-sedation o o o o o o o Treatment Choice based on expert guidelines few high-quality, randomized, controlled trials A American i P Psychiatric hi t i A Association i ti (APA) guidelines, id li llastt updated d t d 2004 mainly for use in hyperactive delirium, role in hypoactive delirium : controversial H l Haloperidol id l : most widely id l used d 0.25mg oral (tablet/drop), 0.5-1mg Intramuscular route : peak effect ~ 20-40mins efficacy shown in randomized, controlled trials : reduce symptoms severity/duration Ad R ti ff l h the h QT interval, l antiAdverse Reactions : extrapyramidall side effects, acute dystonias, lengthen cholinergic effecs (AROU, dry mouth, constipation, increased confusion), sedation Avoid in patients with withdrawal syndrome, hepatic insufficiency, neuroleptic malignant syndrome o o o o o o o o o o Atypical antipsychotics risperidone 0.25mg daily -> 0.5mg bd, olanzapine 2.5mg daily -> 5mg daily, quetiapine 12.5mg daily comparable efficacy to haloperidol demonstrated in small randomized control trial more favorable motor side-effect profile than haloperidol : Prkinson’s disease, Lewy body dementia, prefer in elderly risk of prolong QT interval, increased risk of stroke in older patients with dementia Benzodiazepine not recommended as first-line agents treatment due to effect limited by adverse effect :paradoxical excitation, over-sedation, exacerbation of confusion, respiratory depression withdrawal delirium related to seizures, seizures diffuse use in particular situations : alcohol or sedative-hypnotic drug withdrawal, Lewy body disease, parkinson’s disease, neuroleptic malignant syndrome second-line treatment following failure of antipsychotics lorazepam : preferred agent in geriatric patients, shorter half-life, lack of active metabolites,, availability y in parenteral p form Cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil 5mg daily efficacy reported by case report Is there any prevention for d li ium? delirium? P Prevention i possible? ibl 30-40% preventable Incidence delirium : an iindicator di t of ff failure il of f hospital h it l care? ? Intervention program : HELP Proactive Geriatric consultation : Education program to staff Pharmacological Prophylaxis post fracture hip, decrease delirium 40% Preventive measures Risk factors associated with development of incidence delirium, delirium five independent risk factors identified o o o o o * Precipitating factors for delirium in hospitalized elderly persrons : prevdictive model and interrelationship with baseline vulnerability. JAMA 1996, 275(11):852-7. Inouye SK, Charpentier PA use of physical restraints ( RR4.4 ) malnutrition ( RR4.0 ) more than three medications added ( RR2.9 ) use of bladder catheter ( RR2.4 ) any iatrogenic event ( RR1 RR1.9 9) factors targeted on to prevent incident delirium during hospitalization? Hospital Elder Life p E L f Program g m (HELP) ( EL ) : innovative strategy gy of f hospital care for elderly patients o o o * A Multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. NEJM, 1999 Mar 4;340(9):66976. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier JA, Leo-Summers L, Acampora D, Holford TR, et al. delirium m incidence ( intervention g group p 9.9% 9.9 vs usual care g group p 14%,, matched m OR 0.6, . , CI 0.39-0.92) reduce days of delirium measures include : maintain orientation to surroundings, meeting needs for nutrition, fluid,, sleep f p hygiene, yg , promote p mobility, y, visual and hearing g adaptations p Ph Pharmacological l i l prophylaxis h l i o o Haldoperidol as prophylaxis? Need more study to confirm its role U iin surgical Use i l case may reduce d delirium d li i * Prophylactic consecutive administration of haloperidol can reduce the occurrence of postoperative delirium in gastrointestinal surgery. Yonago Acta. Med 42, 1790184 (1999) Kaneko T et al. . o Cholinesterase inhibitors (Donepezil 5mg daily) as prophylaxis? Prevention studies not demonstrate efficacy * Donepezil in the prevention and treatment of post-surgical delirium. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2005. p 1100 1106 Liptzin B 13(12): p. 1100-1106. B, Laki A A, Garb JL JL, Fingeroth R R, and Krushell R R, * A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil hydrochloride for reducing the incidence of postoperative delirium after elective total hip replaccement. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry. 22, 343-349 (2007). Sampson EL et al. How about our patient…… patient o o o o o o o o Good rehab progress in convalesence hospital walk with stick with supervision, exercise tolerance > 50 meters ADL supervision i i level l l MMSE increase to 14 Discharge home Follow in our GI clinic HBsAg –ve, anti-HBs –ve Anti HCV –ve ve Anti-HCV Anti-HAV –ve ( IgM ) IgM normal, anti-mitochondrial antibodies(AMA) –ve, Antinuclear antibodies(ANA) -ve, Anti-smooth muscle antibodies(SMA) +ve Before admission (27 Oct 09) On admission to surgical ward ( 20 Jan 2010 ) After confusion (23 Jan 10 ) 25 Jan 10 27 Jan 10 Convalesence hospital ( 1 Feb 2010 ) Before discharge ( 10 Feb 10 ) Follow up in GI clinic ( 25 Mar 10 ) Bil 8 190 244 250 196 131 59 14 ALT/AST 11/-- 840/1079 844/713 553/-- 197/-- 118/-- 60/-- 13/22 ALP/GGT 59 220/155 194/-- 181/-- 219/-- 239/-- 216/-- 78/-- INR -- 1.4 1.4 1.3 3 1.0 0 -- 1.04 0 -- Albumin 43 31 27 28 28 30 32 41 Hb 11.7 9.8 10.0 10.1 10.4 9.4 8.9 11.3 Platelet 340 209 313 373 420 380 254 316 WCC 8.3 7.6 8.2 12.1 10.5 5.8 5.3 6.3 Ur/Cr 4.4/76 11/150 5.2/124 5.8/116 -- 5.0/75 4.8/80 4.6/89 Na 145 135 135 138 -- 141 139 146 K 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 -- 3.7 3.9 4.3 So what’s S h t’ th the cause of f acute t hepatitis in our patient? Why did our patient’s skin turn yellow…….. Anti-HEV IgM +ve………… Acute hepatitis E !! H Hepatitis i i E First discovered in 1982, labeled as Hepatitis E in 1989 Four genotypes: 1,2,3,4 1 2 3 4 and a single serotype Small non-enveloped particle consists of a single-strand RNA highly endemic in Central and South East Asia, North and West Africa as well as Mexico Highest rate of symptomatic disease in young to middle-age adults S Seasonal l peak k in i winter i t and d spring i I f Infectivity i i Fecal-oral route : acquired by ingestion of contaminated food or water incubation period ranges from two weeks to two months before y p appear pp symptoms Infectivity peaked at 2 weeks before the onset of symptoms o o Virus excretion in stools up to 14 days after onset of jaundice approximately 4 weeks after oral ingestion of contaminated food or water Cli i l features Clinical f Resemble other types of acute viral hepatitis o o o o o o o o o o o Initially presented with non non-specific specific symptoms anorexia malaise fever vomiting Followed by jaundice j tea colour urine hepatomegaly Less common symptoms arthralgia diarrhoea pruritus urticarial rash Di Diagnosis i and d prognosis i o o o o o Diagnosis by serology test presence of anti-HEV IgM antibodies d t ti of detection f serum HEV RNA by b polymerase l chain h i reaction ti (PCR) Prognosis Recovered in 3-6 weeks Chronic infection not occur Mortality rate report in young adult 0.5-3%, Mortality in third trimester can reach 20% Change in epidemiology in recent years Previously only recognized as a endemic disease in developing countries o o o o o o o In recent years, local acquired hepatitis E infection in developed country increasingly reported more common than prev previous ous recogn recognized zed may be more common than hepatitis A Several new observations mostly due to genotype 3 or 4 many case affected elderly men with other coexisting illness poor prognosis in patient with pre-existing chronic liver disease frequently misdiagnosed as drug-induced liver injury chronic infection with genotype 3 has been reported among immunosuppressed persons * Hepatitis E : an emerging infection in developed countries. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Nov;8(11):698-709. Dalton HR, Bendall R, Ijaz S, Banks M * Epidemiology of Hepatitis E : current status. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 Sept;24(9):1484-93. Aggarwal R, Naik S. L Local l data d f from CHP Notifiable disease in Hong Kong o o o o o Rising trend of hepatitis E in last 10 years ( on the contrary, hepatitis A showed d decreasing trend d ) 1997 : 4 case 2008 : 90 cases 2009 : 74 cases till 2010 Feb : 22 cases Hepatitis A : 595 cases (1997) decrease to 64 cases (2009) Seasonal peak at winter and spring seasons ( Jan to pr ) April Characteristics of viral Hepatitis p E patients from 1998 to 2007 More male than female Higher age Majority patient required hospitalization : median duration of f stay t 7d days o o Higher mortality 3 female and 6 males, age 53-82 Median duration of onset to death was 24 days ( 13 to 77 days ) Most case sporadic, p , no outbreak Fourteen imported case Hepatitis A Hepatitis E Total number of case 2596 276 Male : Female ratio 1.8 : 1 2.5 : 1 Median age in years ( range g ) 26 (2-94) 48.5 (2-85) Proportion of patients requiring hospital treatment 62% 77% Number of deaths ( case fatality rate ) 4 (0 (0.15%) 15%) 9 (3 (3.26%) 26%) P Prevention i Good personal, food, environment hygiene o o o Virus heat-sensitive food cooked thoroughly before consumption oyster cooked with shells removed use separate chopstick for raw and cooked food during hotpot Vaccination not available currently ( a subunit vaccine shown to be effective in preventing clinical disease, not yet commercially available )
© Copyright 2024