© 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. 2014 Winter Anesthesia Seminar Simulation in Anesthesia: What, why, when, who, how? David M. Gaba, M.D. Associate Dean for Immersive and SimulationSimulationbased Learning and Professor of Anesthesia, Stanford University Director, Patient Simulation Center of Innovation at VA Palo Alto HCS © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Disclosures No disclosures of commercial financial interest in last 12 months You should know: I have 3 jobs that pay me to work on simulation in healthcare (Stanford, VA, EIC of journal Simulation in Healthcare) I am on BOD of Soc Sim in Healthcare (SSH) & Treasurer of Adv Initiatives on Med Sim (AIMS) I am on ASA Sim Editorial Board I teach ACRM1,2,3 & MOCA Sim Courses © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Learning Objectives Articulate 7 or more of the 11 dimensions of simulation Describe the different modalities of simulation Look at how simulation can present highhigh-intensity cases with challenging (even rare) clinical situations that demand dynamic decisiondecision-making and team management, to better understand and teach crisis management and patient safety 1 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. What is Simulation? • A “technique” NOT a “technology” –For interactive and often “immersive” activities that rere-create experiences of a realreal-world environment To amplify or replace actual experiences “Even better than the real thing” © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Simulation is Probably PrePre-Historic • Likely a preparation or surrogate for hunting or war Full Immersion Simulation “The Real Thing” Photos via “Adobe Photoshop Time Machine” © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Why Was Anesthesiology Pioneer For Simulation? • Anesthesiologists are riskrisk-averse - Anesthesia is not therapeutic • Cognitive profile matches that of industries that use(d) simulation • Adverse event training has high salience • Anesthesia attracts “nerds” and “techno--geeks” (like me, Schwid, Good, etc.!) “techno 2 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Why Use Simulation? Pathology or Crises “On Demand” • Simulators allow the planned presentation of diverse cases, e.g. –Common conditions & diseases –Time Time--critical and lethal events; high intensity situations –Rare or variant conditions © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Simulation Allows Things That Are Impossible in Real Life • There is no risk to a patient; there is no time pressure for clinical efficiency • Simulation allows start / stop / pause & restart to a prior state • Errors can be allowed to occur without immediate intervention © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. 11 Dimensions of Simulation Application in Health Care • Purpose/goal of simulation - Education ⇔ Training ⇔ Assessment ⇔ Research • Unit of participation - Individual ⇔ Team ⇔ Work Unit ⇔ Hospital • Knowledge, skill, or behavior addressed - Knowing ⇔ Doing ⇔ Deciding ⇔ Teamwork 3 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. 11 Dimensions of Simulation Application in Health Care • Clinical domain(s) domain(s) - Clinic ⇔ Ward ⇔ CathCath-Lab ⇔ OR/ICU/ED Anesth/EM /EM - Psych ⇔ Int Med / Peds ⇔ Surg/ Surg/Anesth • Discipline(s Discipline(s)) of health care personnel - Clerk ⇔ Allied Allied--Health ⇔ Nurse ⇔ MD ⇔ Execs • Experience level(s level(s)) of participants - K-12 ⇔ Univ ⇔ Prof School ⇔ Trainee ⇔ Staff © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. 11 Dimensions of Simulation Application in Health Care • Patient age - Neonate/Infant ⇔ Child ⇔ Adult ⇔ Elderly • Technologies and techniques RoleRoleComputer Virtual play ⇔ Screen ⇔ Reality ⇔ Computerized Mannequin © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. 11 Dimensions of Simulation Application in Health Care • Site of simulation - Home ⇔ Skills Lab ⇔ Sim Ctr ⇔ Actual Worksite • Extent of direct participation Remote Obs & InIn-person Fully ⇔ Interact ⇔ Hands on ⇔ Immersive Obs • Feedback/Reflection – Neonate/Infant ⇔ Child ⇔ Adult ⇔ Elderly 4 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Types of Simulation • Verbal, rolerole-playing, storytelling • ComputerComputer-screen simulation including virtual patients • Part Part--task & procedural trainers © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Types of Simulation • Standardized patient actors • Multiplayer Online Virtual--worlds (MOG) Virtual • Computerized mannequins © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Technological Simulation is Necessary in Anesthesia • In settings such as anesthesia most training goals require a technological simulator - Actors don’t like receiving drugs, intubation, cardiac arrests, etc.! - Verbal simulation only goes so far 5 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. OnOn-Screen Simulators © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Advanced Virtual Technologies Mixed Reality Simulation CAVE Head mounted display VR 6 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Part-task Trainers PartVascular Access © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Part-task Trainers PartIt pays to play with your food! © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. CVP Simulation (MOVAT) 7 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Part-task Trainers PartBronchoscopy Stanford Residents Use Both Systems on Thoracic Anesthesia Rotation Not Free Free Online Bronchoscopy Simulator © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Airway Management Simulation Multiple Trainers; Multiple Tools © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Part--task Trainers Part Echocardiography (TTE & TEE) 8 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Simulators provide the usual monitor data streams © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Scenarios can be challenging medically, technically, and in terms of teamwork © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Face Validity of Simulation 9 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Debriefing Reflection on what transpired • Often similar duration as the simulation scenario (15 – 40 min) • Led by experienced, trained, facilitator • Self, group, expert critique of “performance” not “performer”; discuss alternatives & their pros & cons © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Diverse Applications of Simulation for Anesthesiology • Education (students) •Training (housestaff & experienced) • Research • Quality and Risk Management • Performance Assessment © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Simulation in Anesthesia Education of Students • Introduces students to arena of high dynamism & intrinsic risk • Knowledge, skills, attitudes & behaviors needed for this arena are different than those emphasized in medical school • Recruiting tool for those interested in anesthesia 10 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Potential Impact of Simulation on Patient Safety – Training (HS, BCA) • Improve actual critical clinical skills - Dynamic decision making - Therapy selection - Psychomotor skills of execution • Simulation Simulation--based behavioral training could improve critical behavioral skills - Team management, communication © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Simulation for Integrated Medical & NonNon-technical Skills Team Management Dynamic Decision Making © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Potential Impact of Simulation on Patient Safety -- Research • Simulation Simulation--based research & development can help to study & improve processes of care, care, such as: - Clinical protocols - Human Human--machine interactions - Performance shaping factors (e.g. fatigue) - Cognitive aids/emergency manuals 11 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Quality Management & Risk Management & Systems Safety • In In--situ simulation for “systems probing” - InIn-situ – simulation in actual pt. care areas - “Systems probing” – looking for what works well in the “system” and what latent problems are there • If you fix a systems problem it may be fixed for EVERYONE (no training needed) © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Simulation for Performance Assessment in Anesthesiology? • Not currently used in U.S. for highhigh-stakes assessment (but used in Israel) • Has been used for formative assessment (residents); considerable ongoing research about performance assessment • In 2017 ABA will start OSCEs in 1˚exam - Objective Structured Clinical Exams - Nature of OSCEs not yet set. Not fullfull-blown simulations, but will not be just technical skills © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. MOCA Simulation Course: Curriculum Requirements Set by ABA & ASA Simulation Editorial Board • Every 10 year Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesia (MOCA) cycle requires attending a qualifying simulation course for Part IV of MOC At a site that is ASA endorsed by the ASA (ASA Simulation Editorial Board) 12 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. MOCA Simulation for Part IV– IV– Practice Improvement • Curricula oriented to managing challenging situations (crises) as individual and team • Includes scenarios of hypoxemia, cardiovascular compromise, etc. • Physical recreation of real OR , PACU, etc. © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. MOCA Simulation -- First Two Years McIvor W, Burden A, Weinger WB, Steadman R; 2012, JCEHP 32:236-242 583 diplomates at 27 centers Agree or strongly agree with following Met learner expectations Nonthreatening learning environment Simulations realistic Debriefing enhanced learning Course content relevant to practice What I learned will change my practice (98%) (99%) (98%) (98%) (99%) (94%) Fraction Responding AGREE or STRONGLY AGREE Similar data from ABA for >3000 diplomates, 2014 Relevance Change practice Recommend + experience (partial) 2013 was a milestone year for first cohort (2008) who is required to complete simulation: Year 5 of 10-year cycle in which one Part 4 activity is due 13 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. MOCA Simulation Practice Improvement Plans (PIPs) & FollowFollow-up Reports Steadman RH, Burden AR, Huang YM, Gaba DM, Cooper JB: Practice Improvements Based on Participation in a Simulation Program for Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Anesthesiology, 2014 (Submitted) • 634 participants sampled from 1,261 (1/2010 – 12/2012) • 1,982 Practice Improvement Plans (PIPs) & 634 FollowFollow-up Reports analyzed with: - Word count - Coding of PIP for » Theme » Target of improvement (self, others) » Measurability © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. MOCA Participants Took Practice Improvement Plan Seriously • Participants mostly wrote far more in their plans than the minimum needed Followup PIPs Steadman RH, Burden AR, Huang YM, Gaba DM, Cooper JB: Practice Improvements Based on Participation in a Simulation Program for Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Anesthesiology, 2014 (Submitted) © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. PIP Content and Nature of “Practice Improvements” Category (N; % of “Improvements”) 1. System (820; 33%) Equip/Meds, Education, Checklists, Policy, Simulation 2. Teamwork (737, 30%) Commun, Leadership, Sit Awareness, Resources, Help 3. Knowledge (699, 29% ) Guideline, Funct/Loc, Application, Policy, Literature Steadman et al, submitted 92% of improvements 14 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. PIP Content and Nature of “Practice Improvements” Steadman et al, submitted Completed: Fully Fully/Partially/No /Partially/No 79% / 16% / 6% 74% / 26% Measurable: Yes / No Target of Plan Self + Other Anesth Professionals + Non Non--Anesthesia Physicians + Non Non--Anesth NonNon-physicians (e.g. Nurses, Pharm) 89% 50% 16% 26% © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Summary about MOCA Simulation • Highly intense exercises replicating clinical realities; detailed debriefings • > 3000 participants; Evaluations profoundly positive toto-date, despite cost & hassle • Stimulates practice improvement, often aimed beyond merely the individual participant © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. MOCA Simulation Status • 43 centers in 25 states – currently 4 in CA (UCLA, Irvine, Stanford, UCSF) -- More in CA in future? • MOCA Simulation tuition is significant ($1500 - $2000) - Instructors (1 - 3 per 5 participants); technical staff (esp. if weekend) - Facility & equipment; CME costs; Univ. Overhead “Tax” - Direct costs (food, handouts) - When all costs considered, only some sites “break even” • Travel required for some participants • Throughput is an issue (2˚ to intensity & faculty ratio; most faculty are busy clinically themselves!) 15 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Anesthesia Simulation for MOCA First among many? • Anesthesiology is the first specialty to have simulation for MOC • Others are planning it in various forms: - Emergency Medicine - OB/GYN - Etc.?? © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. The Simulation Vision Is a (many) DecadeS Decade S-long Proposition • The Vision is of training that is: - Comprehensive & Integrated - Continuous – for individuals, teams, work units - Coupled with performance assessment - Over an entire career; embedded in work processes © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. (Simulation) Training Must Be For a Lifetime (cumulative effect) • Career Career--long combination of modalities as individuals & teams, repeatedly cycling through: - Didactics & seminars - OnOn-screen simulators & “virtual worlds” - Courses in dedicated sim center - InIn-situ simulations & drills 16 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Does it Work? CRM/TeamCRM/Team-Training Intervention Evidence is Still Inconclusive Zeltser MV, Nash DB Am J Med Qual, Qual, 2010; 25: 13 13--23 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. {Incidentally} What is the Evidence for Simulation in Commercial Aviation? • There is mandatory yearly training & checking of flying performance - Studies can be grafted onto these activities • Yet, nothing like Level 1A evidence that it saves planes or lives (T3) No randomized trials; they would be unethical to conduct -- pilots are “1st ones at the scene of an accident” © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Translational Research Levels Simulation Education Research McGahie et al, SSH Rsch Summit; Gaba 1 2 3 Performance during simulation (many) Performance during clinical care (few) Outcomes in patients (efficacy) (very very few) 3’ Cost-effectiveness in patients (cost-efficacy) 4 Dissemination (can it be done by others?) 5 6 Adoption (will others actually use it?) Population health impact (if they do, what impact will it actually make?) 17 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Outcome Measurement (T3) is Tractable When: • Simulation intervention is circumscribed; AND • Outcome is easily measured; AND • Outcome moderately common Example: Infection rate after CVC insertion © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Outcome Measurement is Difficult When… • Event is rare (e.g. MH, card arrest) • Outcome is subtle & hard to measure (e.g. cognitive function) • Behavior/skill is complex (e.g. teamwork) • Intervention is complex (e.g. CRM sims) • Many confounds between intervention & outcome (e.g. most inpt. arrests die even with excellent care) © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. The Pharmaceutical Analogy for Simulation: A Policy Perspective (Gaba D: Sim Healthc; 2010, 5:55:5-7) • Who would study an antianti-hypertensive by: - Using a low dose of the study drug - Dosing occasionally to only a few subjects - Ignoring the exacerbating factors » e.g. stress, drug use, salt intake - Following subjects for only a short time • And then expect a major change in outcome?? But…that’s what we’ve done with simulation! 18 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Applications of Simulation Interventions Have Been Limited • Infrequent • Often lowlow-intensity curricula • Little reinforcement in real work • No coupling to performance assessment • In only a few disciplines/domains • Small studies & short time horizons © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Real Test of Simulation Needs a Long Time Horizon • Current studies chip away at small questions (this is good work, but….) • The REAL question is: Does simulation improve quality when there is: –Long Long--term adoption –Comprehensive, integrated model –Career Career--long –Training & assessment –Evaluated over long time horizon © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Pharmaceutical Analogy: Who Pays for Proof? • In clinical trials, often the manufacturer - Huge research budgets, many trials but few successes is “usual” - Huge profits for successful drugs • Simulation community (industry / centers): - Tiny margins [few centers break even], not used to expensive trials with few successes - No “blockbusters” even if trials are successful 19 © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Who Pays for the “Proof”? “The Government”?? • For some diseases govt. funder does pay for large and long trials - Current funding for simulation research comes from quality & safety but with tiny relative budget - No federal agency seriously addresses clinical education research - To To--date small $$ & short, limited studies © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. Anesthesiology is About Saving Lives Just Do It! And whoever saves a life, it is as though he had saved all mankind (appearing in various forms in the Talmud, Sanhedrin 4:5 and the Quran 5:32) © 2014 David M. Gaba, M.D. 20
© Copyright 2024