The Distribution of Diazepam Urinary Metabolites in a Sample of Patients with Chronic Pain Samantha O. Luk, B.S.1; Rabia S. Atayee, Pharm.D.,BCPS1,2; Joseph D. Ma, Pharm.D. 1,2; Brookie M. Best, Pharm.D., MAS1,3; Amadeo J. Pesce, Ph.D., DABCC4,5 1University of California, San Diego (UCSD), Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, La Jolla, CA, 2Doris A. Howell Palliative Care Service, San Diego, CA, 3UCSD Department of Pediatrics, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, CA; 4Millennium Research Institute, San Diego, CA; 5Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCSD School of Medicine, CA Figure 1. Histogram and descriptive statistics of the fraction of diazepam metabolites 2000 1000 0.0 • • Diazepam and its metabolites bind to the allosteric benzodiazepine site on the GABA receptor3 • Enhances GABA transmission and affect downstream processes3. Extensive studies on diazepam and its metabolites in the blood4,6,7, but limited and conflicting data on urinary values • Some argue that temazepam is the primary metabolite9,10 • Some argue that oxazepam is the primary metabolite8,11 • No known standard level of diazepam metabolites in the urine8,9,10,11 • Nordiazepam has been established as the primary metabolite in the blood4,6,7 Difficult to interpret urine test results for diazepam and relate it to plasma concentrations in the body 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Descriptiv e statistic Nordiazepa m Temazepa m Oxazepam Mean 0.17 0.33 0.50 95% Confidenc e Intervals (0.164, 0.168) (0.328, 0.333) (0.500, 0.506) %CV 69.70% 48.42% 41.20% c. 7000 [Creatinine] ≥ 20 mg/dL 927,772 specimens 3000 2000 1000 1 2 3 c. 7000 Taking diazepam only 34,549 specimens Removed those without nordiazepam, temazepam, and oxazepam readings 45,274 specimens Graphical and statistical analysis • Creatinine corrected values were used • Creatinine corrects for the account for body mass, water intake, and hydration status12 • Used these as a measure of metabolic activity: • The creatinine corrected fraction of diazepam metabolite to other diazepam metabolites • The fraction of diazepam metabolites to the total moles of excreted metabolites • Two-sample t-tests and graphical analyses were done with OriginPro 8.5.1 and Microsoft Excel 2010 • Percent coefficient of variation (%CV) was used as a measure of variability • %CV = "#$%&$'& &()*$#*+%/-($% 6000 oxazepam > temaz epam oxaz epam < temazepam Number of subjects 1st or single visit N=21,789 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 -2 -1 0 1 2 log(oxazepam/temazepam) -4 2000 -1 0 1 2 3 Oxazepam -3 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 0.4 0.2 3 Figure 2. Histograms of the log of the fraction of metabolite. • The lines on figures 2a–2c indicate the point at which the metabolites would be equal. • Left of the line = metabolite in denominator is greater • Right of the line = metabolite in numerator is greater • Breakdown: • Nordiazepam < temazepam in 92% of population • Nordiazepam < oxazepam in 82% of population • Temazepam < oxazepam in 71% of population Blood 48 Schwartz, et al., 19658 Urine 2 • Oxazepam = major metabolite • ~30% oxazepam • ~10% temazepam Arnold, 19759 Urine 4 • Temazepam = major metabolite Chiba, et al., 199510 Urine 4 • Temazepam = major metabolite • 50% temazepam • 29% nordiazepam • 21% oxazepam Smith-Kielland, et al., 200111 Urine 27 • Oxazepam = major metabolite Current study -7 -6 -5 -4 Urine 22, 509 -3 Log(Total moles) b. High total moles 0.8 Oxazepam = 0 • In a large population of pain patients, the mean percentage of nordiazepam to temazepam to oxazepam in the urine was 17% to 33% to 50%, which is seen in most subjects • Different from previous studies • 86.80% of the population made all three metabolites 0.33% 0.6 0.71% 0.4 0.45% • 13.20% had one or two of the three possible metabolites • Usually had low total moles • Maybe were at the beginning or end of the dosing interval 86.80% 0.2 0.29% 0.0 Temazepam 0.2 CONCLUSIONS • The amount of each metabolite made is not dependent on the total excreted metabolite • Suggests the diazepam metabolism pathways are not saturated at therapeutic doses Nordiazepam Low total moles 0.1 • Oxazepam = major metabolite • 50% oxazepam • 33% temazepam • 17% nordiazepam Medium high total moles Medium low total moles 0.0 Major findings • Nordiazepam = major metabolite Log(Total moles) 0.6 -8 # of subjects -3 Figure 3. Semi-logarithmic scatterplots of the log of total moles versus the fraction of metabolite. • No relationship between the fraction of metabolite and the total excreted metabolite. • Fraction of nordiazepam is less than the fraction of temazepam and oxazepam (fig. 3a, 3b, 3c) • There is more overlap between the temazepam and oxazepam fraction (fig 3b, 3c) -9 Analyte Greenblatt, et al., 19894 0.2 Log(Total moles) 1.0 3000 -2 0.4 0.0 ox azepam < nordiazepam log(oxazepam/nordiazepam) log(temazepam/nordiazepam) oxaz epam = temazepam N=subjects -5 4000 0 0 0 -6 a. 1000 -1 -7 1.0 Fraction of temazepam Number of subjects Number of subjects temazepam > nordiazepam 4000 -2 -8 Nordiazepam = 0 oxazepam < nordiazepam temazepam < nordiazepam 5000 Temazepam 0.6 RESULTS: METABOLITE DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS oxazepam = nordiazepam 6000 Specimen collection • Urine specimens from1st or single visit patients with chronic pain from 2008-2011 • Urine concentrations analyzed by liquid chromatograph tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) at Millennium Laboratories • Retrospective study on de-identified urine specimens Starting population 1,025,138 specimens b. temaz epam = nordiazepam Nordiazepam 0.8 0.0 -9 5000 METHODS Reported taking diazepam, nordiazepam, temazepam, or oxazepam 55,402 specimens 0.2 0.8 Figure 1. Histogram and descriptive statistics of the fraction of diazepam metabolites • Mean urinary percentage: nordiazepam (17%) < temazepam (33%) < oxazepam (50%) • All three means were significantly different from each other (p<0.00001) • Subjects with fraction of oxazepam = 1 (N = 1580, 7% of the total population) were not found to be significant outliers and analyses were still significant when these values were excluded a. 0.4 1.0 Fraction of metabolite (metabolite/total) The aim of this study was to examine the urinary distribution of diazepam metabolites in a population of pain patients reported to be on diazepam and not any of its metabolites. 0.6 0.0 RESULTS: FRACTION OF METABOLITE OBJECTIVES 0.8 DISCUSSION: COMPARISION WITH OTHER STUDIES Study 1.0 Fraction of temazepam 3000 b.b. 1.0 Table 1. Summary of descriptive statistics (N =21,789) 4000 0 • a. Nordiazepam Temazepam Oxazepam * 5000 RESULTS: METABOLITE TO TOTAL MOLES Fraction of nordiazepam • Diazepam is used as an adjuvant to opioid therapy to reduce painrelated anxiety and serves as a muscle relaxant in pain patients1,2,3 Metabolized to either nordiazepam or temazepam by various cytochrome P450 enzymes • N o r d i a z e p a m a n d temazepam are further metabolized to oxazepam4,5 • All three metabolites are pharmacologically active Number of subjects • RESULTS: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION Fraction of oxazepam BACKGROUND 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 4.18% 7.25% Oxazepam • Diazepam urinary population data allows us to better understand how to interpret urine values 1.0 Fraction of nordiazepam Temazepam = 0 Figure 4. Scatterplots (non-stratified and stratified for total moles) and Venn diagram of metabolite distribution. • Arrows and the corresponding legends on figure 4a indicate where nordiazepam, temazepam, or oxazepam equal zero • Those that are missing one of the three possible metabolites in the urine usually have low moles • Fig. 4b describes the percentage of the population with urine readings for the diazepam metabolites • As seen in fig. 4b, 86.80% have all three possible urinary diazepam metabolites, making up the majority of the subjects in fig 4a. • From fig. 4b, 13.20% of the population makes only one or two of the three possible metabolites • Usually have low total excreted metabolite (fig 4a. and fig 4b.) • 90% of these subjects with < 3 metabolites had oxazepam in their urine ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLOSURES Thank you to UCSD Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Millennium Research Institute and Elizabeth Gonzales for their generous help. Thank you to Neveen Barakat, Sophie Bordson, Natalie Elder, Alex Guo, Michelle Hughes, Katie Moy, Stephanie Tse, and David Yee for all their support, feedback, and assistance. Disclosure: Dr. Pesce is an employee of Millennium Laboratories, Inc. References 1. Baselt, RC. Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man. Biomedical Publications, Foster City, CA, 2008. 2. Davies JM, Rosen M. Intramuscular diazepam in labour. A double-blind trial in multiparae. Br J Anaesth. 1977 Jun;49(6):601-4. 3. Di Piero V, Ferracuti S, Sabatini U, Tombari D, Di Legge S, Pantano P, Cruccu G, Lenzi GL. Diazepam effects on the cerebral responses to tonic pain: a SPET study. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Nov; 158(3): 252-8. 4. Greenblatt DJ, Ochs HR, Lloyd BL. Entry of diazepam and its major metabolite into cerebrospinal fluid. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;70(1):89-93 5. Andersson T, Miners JO, Veronese ME, Birkett DJ. Diazepam metabolism by human liver microsomes is mediated by both S-mephenytoin hydroxylase and CYP3A isoforms. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Aug; 38(2): 131-7. 6. Friedman H, Abernethy DR, Greenblatt DJ, Shader RI. The pharmacokinetics of diazepam and desmethyldiazepam in rat brain and plasma. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;88(3):267-70. 7. Greenblatt DJ, Harmatz JS, Friedman H, Locniskar A, Shader RI. A large-sample study of diazepam pharmacokinetics. Ther Drug Monit. 1989 Nov;11(6):652-7. 8. Schwartz MA, Koechlin BA, Postma E, Palmer S, Krol G. Metabolism of diazepam in rat, dog, and man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1965 Sep;149(3):423-35. 9. Arnold E. A simple method for determining diazepam and its major metabolites in biological fluids: application in bioavailability studies. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1975 Apr;36(4):335-52. 10. Chiba K, Horii H, Chiba T, Kato Y, Hirano T, Ishizaki T. Development and preliminary application of high-performance liquid chromatographic assay of urinary metabolites of diazepam in humans. Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 1995 Jun 9;668(1):77-84. 11. Smith-Kielland A, Skuterud B, Olsen KM, Morland J. Urinary excretion of diazepam metabolites in healthy volunteers and drug users. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2001 May;61(3):237-46. 12. Heit HA, Gourlay DL. Urine drug testing in pain medicine. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Mar;27(3):260-7. UC San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences logo is a trademark or registered trademark of UCSD and the Regents of the University of California or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. Millennium Research Institute logo is a trademark or registered trademark of Millennium Research Institute or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. MRI-MKT11201 © 2011 Millennium Laboratories, Inc. and Millennium Research Institute. 08/2011
© Copyright 2024