Investigations into various sample preparation techniques for the production of shellfish laboratory reference materials for Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning toxins Andrew Turner, Robert Hatfield, Andy Powell and Wendy Higman Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Barrack Road, Weymouth, Dorset, DT4 8UB, UK. Biological testing Alexandrium Mass Cultures and Oyster Feeding • • • Strains: CCMP 1598, CCMP 1846, CCMP 1719. 12 Tubular Bag, 360L reactor; 14L:10D cycle; 17º C. Algae added gradually to shellfish held at 17º C over 5 days. Homogeneity of treated and non-treated mussel and native oyster LRMs as determined by RSDs (n=12, duplicate analysis). Toxins GTX 1,4 NEO C 1,2 dcSTX GTX 2,3 GTX 5 STX Total Mussels Wet frozen 5% 5% 2% 2% 1% 4% 2% 2% Mussels AS 9% 8% 3% 5% 3% 5% 3% 5% N. Oyster Wet frozen - - 8% - 7% 8% 4% 5% N. Oyster AS - - 5% - 8% 6% 8% 6% Sample preparation Wet frozen aliquots: Mussel and native oyster materials homogenised and aliquoted (6g) prior to testing. Gamma irradiation: 6g aliquots (native oyster and mussel) LRMs submitted to irradiation at 3, 6, 13, 18.1 kGy (Isotron, UK). Artificial stabilisers (AS): Wet homogenate (native oyster and mussels) treated with Ethoxyquin, Ampicillin, Oxytetracycline and Erythromycin (0.02% w/w). High pressure processing (HPP): Homogenate, split into 6 subsamples, each divided further into triplicates. Each set of triplicate samples subjected to HPP under variable conditions (AFBI, Northern Ireland). Microbial testing of mussel and native oyster LRMs 1 week and 6 months after sample treatment (incubation between 1 and 7 days at 25oC, units CFU/g; LOD = 5 CFU/g). Initial testing during week 1 Incubation 3 kGy 6 kGy 12 kGy 18 kGy Control Mussels 1 day 7 days <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD 20 >30000 Native oysters 1 day 7 days <LOD >3000 <LOD <LOD <LOD >30 <LOD 480 195 >300000 Re-test after 6 months Native Mussels oysters 3 days 3 days <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD <LOD >700 >300000 HPP Gamma LRMs tested using a total viable count (TVC) method. Duplicate 100μl aliquots of serial log10 dilutions of LRM sample spread onto the surface of plate count agar (Oxoid CM0325) plates and incubated at 25±1°C for 1 day and 7 days prior to visual examination. Testing was repeated on LRMs stored for 6 months. PSP toxin concentra�ons and PSP toxicity normalised to control Experiments have been conducted at Cefas to contaminate a variety of shellfish species through feeding experiments with toxic Alexandrium in order to produce a range of suitable reference materials for the validation and implementation of quantitative analytical PSP methods. Post-production work concentrated on determining the homogeneity and stability of oyster and mussel materials, initially focussing on the potential use as laboratory reference materials for application to the AOAC 2005.06 HPLC-FLD method. A number of different techniques were investigated to potentially prolong the lifetime of the materials, including the use of different storage conditions, artificial matrix stabilisers and the use of gamma irradiation. HPLC-FLD chromatograms of Pacific oyster LRMs following peroxide oxidation of C18 extracts of travel control and HPP treated samples HPLC-FLD chromatograms of native oyster samples following peroxide oxidation of C18 extracts of a) control oyster b) 18 kGy irradiated oyster 1.40 PSP toxin concentrations and total STX eq. measured in native oyster samples after gamma irradiation at 4 dose levels (± 1 sd). 1.20 1.00 C1,2 0.80 1.40 GTX2,3 0.60 STX 0.40 Total STX eq. 0.20 0.00 Control 3 kGy 6 kGy 12 kGy Effects of HPP processing conditions on PSP toxin concentrations 1.20 Toxin concentra�ons (normalised against control) Introduction 18 kGy 1.00 GTX 1,4 0.80 NEO C 1,2 0.60 GTX 2,3 STX Total 0.40 0.20 0.00 200MPa, 5°C 400MPa, 5°C 600MPa, 5°C 200MPa, 35°C 400MPa, 35°C 600MPa, 35°C Controls HPP Processing Condi�ons HPP processing conditions. Set temperature 5°C 5°C 5°C 35°C 35°C 35°C Sample analysis PSP toxin testing • • • 12 randomly selected aliquots analysed in duplicate for homogeneity testing LRMs stored at -80oC, -20oC and +4oC for 9 time points over a 12-month period in order to assess the stability of the materials. Classical stability assessment performed to determine potential issues during the assessment period LRMs extracted and analysed using AOAC 2005.06 method. PSP toxin concentrations quantified in terms of µg saxitoxin dihydrochloride equivalents per 100g flesh (µg STX eq./100g). Stability of PSP toxins in mussels over 12 months following a variety of sample processing techniques 1.40 Stability of PSP toxins in native oysters over 12 months following a variety of sample processing techniques STX 1.20 GTX23 2.00 1.60 1.00 1.40 0.80 0.60 1.00 -20°C 0.40 +4°C 0.20 AS +4°C 0.00 AS -20°C 0 100 200 300 1.80 400 NEO 1.60 1.40 Gamma 3kGy Gamma 6kGy Gamma 12 kGy 1.20 Gamma 18kGy 1.00 • 1.20 -80°C reference • • 0.80 0.60 0.40 • 0.20 0.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 C1,2 1.60 1.40 • • 1.20 • 1.00 0.80 0.80 Conclusions • 1.80 Response relave to -80C reference Set Time 5 min 5 min 5 min 5 min 5 min 5 min Response rela�ve to -80C reference Set Pressure 200 MPa 400 MPa 600 MPa 200 MPa 400 MPa 600 MPa Gamma, AS and Frozen Sample HPP1 HPP2 HPP3 HPP4 HPP5 HPP6 Gamma irradiation at 4 dose levels effectively eliminates biological activity No effects on PSP toxin concentrations following gamma irradiation, HPP or addition of artificial stabilisers Homogenous LRMs created following the above treatment Most of the toxins stable following the majority of treatment protocols Some evidence for instability of some toxins in some LRMs, seemingly improved in irradiated samples. Stability assessment incorporates relatively high levels of method repeatability Further work continuing to assess short and long term stability following reverse isochronous design Additional work ongoing investigating effects of freeze drying on oyster LRMs 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0 100 200 Time (days) 300 400 0 50 100 150 200 Time (days) 250 300 350 400 Acknowledgements Cefas Seedcorn project funding, InterAct partnership funded by the Department of Business Innovation and Skills. Martin Dawson, Isotron, UK, Mark Linton and Margaret Patterson, AFBI, Northern Ireland. Lewis Coates for technical help. Contact: [email protected]
© Copyright 2024