Sample Problem Associated to Transport Phenomena

Sample Problem Associated to Transport Phenomena
At the fluid dynamic laboratory, a group of engineers are doing a test. Air is at 300°K, 1 atmospheric pressure
flows at 200 Km/h over a flat surface 1 m long. The engineers consider the concentration of vapor in the air is
negligible.
The diffusion of water vapor into air is 0.5 x 10βˆ’4 m²/s and the Colburn J factor for mass transfer coefficient is
given by JM = 0.03 x 𝑅𝑒 βˆ’0.2 .
Calculate the mass transfer coefficient (β„Žπ‘š) of water vapor from the flat surface into the air.
Properties of air at 300°K and 1 atmosphere are:
𝜌 = 1.177 Kg/m³
Cp = 1005 J/Kg°K
πœ‡ = 1.84 π‘₯ 10βˆ’5 Kg/m.s
Pr (Prandtl) = 0.708
0.173 m/s
b) 0.841 m/s
c) 0.542 m/s
d) 1.533 m/s
Solution
To solve this problem , the first step is to identify the System and Process.
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
1
Identifying our System
Air (at 300°K, 1 atmospheric pressure) flows at
200 Km/h over a flat surface (which contain
Water Vapor) 1 m long
Our system contains two components (Air and Water Vapor) whose concentration vary
from point to point. Therefore, there is a natural tendency for mass to be transferred,
minimizing the concentration differences within the system.
The transport of one constituent from a region of higher concentration to that of
lower concentration is called mass transfer
In this case Water Vapor is diffusing into Air
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
2
IMPORTANT CONCEPT
The Mass transfer in our system is due to convection and involves transfer of
mass between a moving fluid (Air) and a flat surface (which contain Water
Vapor)
Similar to Newton’s law for convective heat transfer, the convective mass transfer
equation can be written as:
Our objective (Unknown)
π‘š = hm x A x βˆ†π‘
where hm is the convective mass transfer coefficient and Ξ”c is the
difference between the boundary surface concentration and the average
concentration of fluid stream
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
3
Similar to convective heat transfer, convective mass transfer coefficient depends on
the type of flow, i.e., laminar or turbulent and forced or free.
In general the mass transfer coefficient is a function of the system geometry, fluid
and flow properties and the concentration difference.
In convective mass transfer the non-dimensional numbers corresponding to
Prandtl and Nusselt numbers of convective heat transfer are called as Schmidt
and Sherwood numbers. These are defined as:
π’‰π’Ž 𝒙 𝑳
Sherwood Number (Sh) =
π‘«π’Ž
Long or diameter
(In our case is the longitude
of flat surface)
Diffusion coefficient(Diffusivity)
Schmidt Number (Sc) =
𝝂
π‘«π’Ž
kinematic viscosity
Diffusion coefficient(Diffusivity)
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
4
Very important concept
The first recognition of the analogous behaviour of mass, heat and momentum transfer was reported
by Osborne Reynolds in 1874.
Reynolds postulated that the mechanisms for transfer of momentum, energy and mass are identical.
Accordingly:
β„Žπ‘š=
β„Žπ‘š
π‘‰βˆž
β„Ž
= πœŒβˆ—Ξ½βˆžβˆ—πΆπ‘
=
𝒇
𝟐
Convective Mass Transfer Coefficient
β„Ž= Heat Transfer Coefficient
𝒇= Moody friction factor
V∞ = Velocity of free stream
The Reynolds analogy is interesting because it suggests a very simple relation between
different transport phenomena.
This relation is found to be accurate when Prandtl and Schmidt numbers are equal
This is applicable for mass transfer by means of turbulent eddies in gases.
to one (1) .
In this situation, we can estimate mass transfer coefficients from heat transfer coefficients or from friction
factors.
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
In our problem Prandtl (Pr) = 0.708
5
we cannot apply Reynolds Analogy
Therefore
Chilton – Colburn Analogy
Chilton and Colburn, using experimental data, sought modifications to the Reynold’s analogy that
would not have the restrictions that Prandtl and Schmidt numbers must be equal to one.
They defined for the j factor for mass transfer as
JM = π‘†β„Ž βˆ—
𝑆𝑐 2/3
=
𝒇 (Fanning Friction Factor)
2
JM= Chilton-Colburn factor for mass transfer
In accordance with our case
The analogy is valid between momentum and mass transfer for a flat plate:
This analogy is valid for gases and liquids within the range of 0.6 < Sc < 2500 and 0.6 <Pr < 100
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
6
The Chilton-Colburn analogy has been observed to hold
quite well in laminar or Turbulent over flow over plane
surfaces
But this is not always the case for internal flow and flow
over Irregular geometries, and in such cases specific
relationships developed should be used
𝒇= 4 x 𝒇(Fanning Friction Factor)
Therefore
JM = π‘†β„Ž βˆ—
𝒇
= 𝑓(Fanning Friction Factor)
4
𝑆𝑐 2/3
𝑓
=
8
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
7
For Flat Plate
JM = 0.664 𝑅𝑒 βˆ’1/2
For Laminar flow
JM = 0.037 𝑅𝑒 βˆ’0.2
For Turbulent flow
Now we need to verify if our flow is turbulent or laminar
In order to know what JM factor formula we will use
Re =
πœŒβˆ—π‘‰βˆ—πΏ
πœ‡
=
1.1744 βˆ— 55.5 βˆ— 1
= 3,539398 .79
βˆ’5
1.8463 βˆ— 10
(Turbulent)
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
8
We use the JM according with our data
JM = 0.03 𝑅𝑒 βˆ’0.2
=
π‘†β„Ž βˆ— 𝑆𝑐 2/3
0.00147 (approx.)
𝑆𝑐
π’‰π’Ž 𝒙 𝑳
π‘«π’Ž
Therefore
=
π’‰π’Ž
π‘«π’Ž
𝑳
𝝂
= π‘«π’Ž
=
πœ‡
=
πœŒβˆ—π·π‘š
1.84βˆ—10βˆ’5
1.1774βˆ—0.5βˆ—10βˆ’4
= 0.3126 (approx.)
= π’‰π’Ž =
π‰πŒ βˆ— 𝐕
π’‰π’Ž = 𝟐/πŸ‘
π’πœ
𝑽
1.47 βˆ— 10βˆ’3 βˆ— 55.5
= 0.175 m/s (approx.)
=
2/3
0.3126
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
9
Final Comments
Mass transfer by convection involves the transport of material between a
boundary surface (such as solid or liquid surface) and a moving fluid or between two
relatively immiscible, moving fluids.
There are two different cases of convective mass transfer:
1. Mass transfer takes place only in a single phase either to or from a phase
boundary, as in sublimation of naphthalene (solid form) into the moving air.
2. Mass transfer takes place in the two contacting phases as in extraction and
absorption.
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
10
Reynolds Analogy
Reynolds Analogy is restricted to situations for which Pr = Sc = 1
When the molecular diffusivity of momentum, heat, and mass are equal to each other
The velocity, temperature, and concentration boundary layers coincide
In this case the normalized velocity, temperature and concentration profiles will coincide
and the slope of these three curves at the surface will be identical
Reynolds analogy enables us to determine the unrelated friction, heat transfer,
and mass transfer coefficients when only one of them is known
Laminar
Transition
Turbulent
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
11
Chilton – Colburn Analogy
Valid when Pr β‰  𝑆𝑐 β‰  1
When the friction or heat transfer coefficient is known, the mass transfer coefficient
Can be determined directly from the Chilton-Colburn Analogy
This analogy is valid for gases and liquids within the range of 0.6 < Sc < 2500 and
0.6 < Pr < 100.
The power of the Chilton-Colburn j-factor analogy is represented various experimental
values of JM or JH from a flat plate with flow parallel to the plate surface.
The Chilton-Colburn analogy has been observed to hold for many different geometries.
For example, flow over flat plates, flow in pipes, and flow around cylinders
Carlos Batista M.Sc. P Eng. CCEA
www.cbaengineer.com Phone: 403-245-8505
12