MGO Scrubber Strategy Fuel decision LNG Other (LNG Ready service) (Methanol, Battery ++) ECA and fuel decision support Concept & Technology Scrubber selection & benchmarking Detailed tech feasibility study Concept design review Detailed tech feasibility study Technology Qualification Performance benchmarking Concept HAZID Performance benchmarking Concept HAZID Initial design Technology Qualification Approval in principle Risk assessment Risk assessment DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 1 MARITIME The value of Technology Qualification Knudsen, Simen 04.03.2014 2 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER Challenges on the horizon SOx NOx CO2 Ballast water BC 4 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 The risks of new technology It is found that anything that can go wrong at sea, generally does go wrong sooner or later, so it is not to be wondered that owners prefer the safe to the scientific - Stephen Goranson, 1877 5 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 Technology Qualification Technology Qualification is the process of providing the evidence that a technology will function within specified operational limits with an acceptable level of confidence. TQ WHY 6 DNV GL © 2013 We believe that it’s important to reduce the environmental footprint from shipping, by accelerating the implementation of environmental technology in a safe and sustainable way. 04.03.2014 TQ – 6 steps in 3 phases 1 Qualification Basis …function within Milestones specified operational limits… Technology Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TA 2 Threat Assessment …providing the evidence… DET NORSKE VERITAS Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Execution of plan …acceptable level of confidence… TQ? NT 04.03.2014 7 7 Endorsement of Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Yes DNV GL © 2013 Technology Qualification Plan DET NORSKE VERITAS Performance Assessment 7 Statement of Feasibility Technology Assessment Report TQP 3 DNV deliverables No Fall-back or hold Technology Qualification Report DET NORSKE VERITAS Technology Certificate Phase 1 – Defining the requirements Qualification Basis Milestones Technology Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TA 2 Threat Assessment …providing the evidence… DET NORSKE VERITAS Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Execution of plan …acceptable level of confidence… TQ? NT 04.03.2014 8 8 Endorsement of Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Yes DNV GL © 2013 Technology Qualification Plan DET NORSKE VERITAS Performance Assessment 8 Statement of Feasibility Technology Assessment Report TQP 3 DNV deliverables No Fall-back or hold Technology Qualification Report DET NORSKE VERITAS Technology Certificate Phase 1 – Purpose Level of assurance/ requirements Owner/Yard requirements How to close this gap? Specification from supplier IMO MEPC Class (safety) DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 Phase 1 – Qualification basis DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 ETC. INSTALLATION Unified requirements - Qualification basis - Critical parameters MAINTENACE ENERGY EFFICIENCY SAFETY Level of assurance/ requirements Phase 1 – Technology Assessment Technology Maturity DNV GL © 2013 Application Area Proven Limited field history New or unproven Known 1 2 3 New 2 3 4 04.03.2014 TQ – Phase 2 1 Qualification Basis …function within Milestones specified operational limits… Technology Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TA 2 Threat Assessment …providing the evidence… DET NORSKE VERITAS Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Execution of plan …acceptable level of confidence… TQ? NT 04.03.2014 12 12 Endorsement of Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Yes DNV GL © 2013 Technology Qualification Plan DET NORSKE VERITAS Performance Assessment 12 Statement of Feasibility Technology Assessment Report TQP 3 DNV deliverables No Fall-back or hold Technology Qualification Report DET NORSKE VERITAS Technology Certificate Phase 2 – Threat assessments 1 Qualification Basis …function within Milestones DNV deliverables specified operational limits… Technology Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TA Statement of Feasibility Technology Assessment Report Threat Assessment DET NORSKE VERITAS Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT TQP 3 Execution of plan …acceptable level of confidence… TECHNICAL REPORT TQ? Yes NT DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 13 13 Endorsement of Qualification Plan DET NORSKE VERITAS Performance Assessment 13 Technology Qualification Plan No Fall-back or hold Technology Qualification Report DET NORSKE VERITAS Technology Certificate Phase 2 – Threat assessments HAZID FMECA • Failure Mode Effect Criticality An. • Hazard Identification. • Teknisk risiko på komponenter: • Operasjonell tilnærming. • Hvordan kan utstyret feile? • Arbeidsomfang (typisk): • Hvor sannsynlig er feil? • Design • Hva er konsekvensene? • Installasjon Begrensinger: tar ikke høyde for mennesklig feil, operasjonelle eller eksterne faktorer. • Commissioning • Operasjon • Decommissioning • DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 Phase 2 – Technology Qualification Plan Risikobildet etter risikoanalyse H L DNV GL © 2013 L 04.03.2014 L M L L M ETC. M M H INSTALLATION L MAINTENACE SAFETY M ENERGY EFFICIENCY H L L L Unified requirements - Qualification basis - Critical parameters TQ – Phase 3 1 Qualification Basis …function within Milestones specified operational limits… Technology Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TA 2 Threat Assessment …providing the evidence… DET NORSKE VERITAS Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Execution of plan …acceptable level of confidence… TQ? NT 04.03.2014 16 16 Endorsement of Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT Yes DNV GL © 2013 Technology Qualification Plan DET NORSKE VERITAS Performance Assessment 16 Statement of Feasibility Technology Assessment Report TQP 3 DNV deliverables No Fall-back or hold Technology Qualification Report DET NORSKE VERITAS Technology Certificate Phase 3 - Execution 1 Qualification Basis …function within Milestones specified operational limits… Technology Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TA 2 DNV deliverables Statement of Feasibility Technology Assessment Report Threat Assessment …providing the evidence… DET NORSKE VERITAS Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT TQP Execution of plan Technology Qualification Plan Endorsement of Qualification Plan DET NORSKE VERITAS Performance Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TQ? Yes NT 17 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 17 17 No Fall-back or hold Technology Qualification Report DET NORSKE VERITAS Technology Certificate Phase 3 – Performance assessment L DNV GL © 2013 L 04.03.2014 L L L ETC. INSTALLATION L M MAINTENACE ENERGY EFFICIENCY M SAFETY Risikobildet etter utførelsen av Technology Qualification Plan M L L L OK? The Technology Qualification Process Qualification Basis Milestones Technology Assessment DNV deliverables TECHNICAL REPORT TA Statement of Feasibility Technology Assessment Report Threat Assessment DET NORSKE VERITAS Qualification Plan TECHNICAL REPORT TQP Execution of plan Technology Qualification Plan Endorsement of Qualification Plan DET NORSKE VERITAS Performance Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT TQ? Yes NT 19 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 19 19 No Fall-back or hold Technology Qualification Report DET NORSKE VERITAS Technology Certificate The value of Technology Qualification Supplier User + Quality of technology + Confidence + Less prototyping + Understanding + Business opportunities + Safety, reliability, profitability + Communication + Project results 20 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 Looks like innovation is stopping. It’s time to panic… 1950 2014=1864 1700 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014 2500 The value of Technology Qualification Simen Knudsen [email protected] www.dnvgl.com SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER 22 DNV GL © 2013 04.03.2014
© Copyright 2024