Simen Knudsen TQ - Det Norske Veritas

MGO
Scrubber
Strategy Fuel decision
LNG
Other
(LNG Ready service)
(Methanol, Battery
++)
ECA and fuel decision support
Concept
& Technology
Scrubber selection
&
benchmarking
Detailed tech
feasibility
study
Concept
design
review
Detailed tech
feasibility
study
Technology
Qualification
Performance
benchmarking
Concept
HAZID
Performance
benchmarking
Concept
HAZID
Initial design
Technology
Qualification
Approval
in principle
Risk assessment
Risk
assessment
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
1
MARITIME
The value of Technology Qualification
Knudsen, Simen
04.03.2014
2
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER
Challenges on the horizon
SOx
NOx
CO2
Ballast water
BC
4
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
The risks of new technology
It is found that anything that can go wrong at sea,
generally does go wrong sooner or later,
so it is not to be wondered that owners prefer
the safe to the scientific
- Stephen Goranson, 1877
5
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
Technology Qualification
Technology Qualification is the process of
providing the evidence that a technology will
function within specified operational limits
with an acceptable level of confidence.
TQ
WHY
6
DNV GL © 2013
We believe that it’s important to
reduce the environmental footprint from shipping,
by accelerating the implementation of environmental
technology in a safe and sustainable way.
04.03.2014
TQ – 6 steps in 3 phases
1
Qualification
Basis
…function within
Milestones
specified operational
limits…
Technology Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TA
2
Threat Assessment
…providing the
evidence…
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Execution of plan
…acceptable level of
confidence…
TQ?
NT
04.03.2014
7
7
Endorsement of
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Yes
DNV GL © 2013
Technology
Qualification
Plan
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Performance Assessment
7
Statement of
Feasibility
Technology
Assessment
Report
TQP
3
DNV deliverables
No
Fall-back
or hold
Technology
Qualification
Report
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Technology
Certificate
Phase 1 – Defining the requirements
Qualification Basis
Milestones
Technology Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TA
2
Threat Assessment
…providing the
evidence…
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Execution of plan
…acceptable level of
confidence…
TQ?
NT
04.03.2014
8
8
Endorsement of
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Yes
DNV GL © 2013
Technology
Qualification
Plan
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Performance Assessment
8
Statement of
Feasibility
Technology
Assessment
Report
TQP
3
DNV deliverables
No
Fall-back
or hold
Technology
Qualification
Report
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Technology
Certificate
Phase 1 – Purpose
Level of assurance/
requirements
Owner/Yard requirements
How to
close
this gap?
Specification from supplier
IMO MEPC
Class (safety)
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
Phase 1 – Qualification basis
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
ETC.
INSTALLATION
Unified requirements
- Qualification basis
- Critical parameters
MAINTENACE
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
SAFETY
Level of assurance/
requirements
Phase 1 – Technology Assessment
Technology Maturity
DNV GL © 2013
Application Area
Proven
Limited field history
New or unproven
Known
1
2
3
New
2
3
4
04.03.2014
TQ – Phase 2
1
Qualification
Basis
…function within
Milestones
specified operational
limits…
Technology Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TA
2
Threat Assessment
…providing the
evidence…
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Execution of plan
…acceptable level of
confidence…
TQ?
NT
04.03.2014
12
12
Endorsement of
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Yes
DNV GL © 2013
Technology
Qualification
Plan
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Performance Assessment
12
Statement of
Feasibility
Technology
Assessment
Report
TQP
3
DNV deliverables
No
Fall-back
or hold
Technology
Qualification
Report
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Technology
Certificate
Phase 2 – Threat assessments
1
Qualification
Basis
…function within
Milestones
DNV deliverables
specified operational
limits…
Technology Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TA
Statement of
Feasibility
Technology
Assessment
Report
Threat Assessment
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
TQP
3
Execution of plan
…acceptable level of
confidence…
TECHNICAL REPORT
TQ?
Yes
NT
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
13
13
Endorsement of
Qualification Plan
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Performance Assessment
13
Technology
Qualification
Plan
No
Fall-back
or hold
Technology
Qualification
Report
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Technology
Certificate
Phase 2 – Threat assessments
HAZID
FMECA
•
Failure Mode Effect Criticality An.
•
Hazard Identification.
•
Teknisk risiko på komponenter:
•
Operasjonell tilnærming.
•
Hvordan kan utstyret feile?
•
Arbeidsomfang (typisk):
•
Hvor sannsynlig er feil?
•
Design
•
Hva er konsekvensene?
•
Installasjon
Begrensinger: tar ikke høyde for
mennesklig feil, operasjonelle
eller eksterne faktorer.
•
Commissioning
•
Operasjon
•
Decommissioning
•
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
Phase 2 – Technology Qualification Plan
Risikobildet etter risikoanalyse
H
L
DNV GL © 2013
L
04.03.2014
L
M
L
L
M
ETC.
M
M
H
INSTALLATION
L
MAINTENACE
SAFETY
M
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
H
L
L
L
Unified requirements
- Qualification basis
- Critical parameters
TQ – Phase 3
1
Qualification
Basis
…function within
Milestones
specified operational
limits…
Technology Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TA
2
Threat Assessment
…providing the
evidence…
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Execution of plan
…acceptable level of
confidence…
TQ?
NT
04.03.2014
16
16
Endorsement of
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
Yes
DNV GL © 2013
Technology
Qualification
Plan
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Performance Assessment
16
Statement of
Feasibility
Technology
Assessment
Report
TQP
3
DNV deliverables
No
Fall-back
or hold
Technology
Qualification
Report
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Technology
Certificate
Phase 3 - Execution
1
Qualification
Basis
…function within
Milestones
specified operational
limits…
Technology Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TA
2
DNV deliverables
Statement of
Feasibility
Technology
Assessment
Report
Threat Assessment
…providing the
evidence…
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
TQP
Execution of plan
Technology
Qualification
Plan
Endorsement of
Qualification Plan
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Performance Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TQ?
Yes
NT
17
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
17
17
No
Fall-back
or hold
Technology
Qualification
Report
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Technology
Certificate
Phase 3 – Performance assessment
L
DNV GL © 2013
L
04.03.2014
L
L
L
ETC.
INSTALLATION
L
M
MAINTENACE
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
M
SAFETY
Risikobildet etter utførelsen av
Technology Qualification Plan
M
L
L
L
OK?
The Technology Qualification Process
Qualification Basis
Milestones
Technology Assessment
DNV deliverables
TECHNICAL REPORT
TA
Statement of
Feasibility
Technology
Assessment
Report
Threat Assessment
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Qualification Plan
TECHNICAL REPORT
TQP
Execution of plan
Technology
Qualification
Plan
Endorsement of
Qualification Plan
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Performance Assessment
TECHNICAL REPORT
TQ?
Yes
NT
19
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
19
19
No
Fall-back
or hold
Technology
Qualification
Report
DET NORSKE VERITAS
Technology
Certificate
The value of Technology Qualification
Supplier
User
+ Quality of technology
+ Confidence
+ Less prototyping
+ Understanding
+ Business opportunities
+ Safety, reliability, profitability
+ Communication
+ Project results
20
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
Looks like innovation is stopping. It’s time to panic…
1950
2014=1864
1700
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014
2500
The value of Technology Qualification
Simen Knudsen
[email protected]
www.dnvgl.com
SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER
22
DNV GL © 2013
04.03.2014