Assessment Map Sample This sample assessment map provides an example of how to think about how the learning of a standard progresses over a unit. It can be used at the module level as well. For the purposes of honing in on a specific standard, this map only includes a small segment of the total map. Standard RL.9-10.5 Analyze how an author's choices concerning how to structure a text, order events within it (e.g., parallel plots), and manipulate time (e.g., pacing, flashbacks) create such effects as mystery, tension, or surprise. Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Text Assessment Unit 1 Lesson 3 RL.9-10.5 “The Tell-Tale Heart” (paragraph 3) The learning in this lesson will be captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students will answer the following prompt based on the close reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson: Unit 1 Lesson 5 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.5 “Tell-Tale Heart” (paragraphs 8–13) Unit 1 Lesson 7 RL.9-10.5 “The Tell-Tale Heart” (entire text) How does Poe manipulate (use) time in paragraph 3? What is the effect of Poe’s manipulation (use) of time? The learning in this lesson will be captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students will answer the following prompt based on the evidence-based discussion completed in the lesson: How do Poe’s structural choices contribute to the development and refinement of a central idea? The learning in this lesson will be captured through an Exit Ticket at the end of the lesson. Students will make an original claim about Poe’s use of text structure, time, or order of events and support the claim with evidence from the text. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. Commented [CK1]: This is the first prompt that asks students to consider RL. 9-10.5. It directs their attention very specifically to a certain detail and asks them to consider the effect of that detail. It asks students to connect these two things, but doesn’t ask them to generate anything very deep. Commented [CK2]: With this prompt, Students are asked to connect notions of structure and central idea in a broad way. Since this is a suspenseful story, the notion of suspense, tension, or mystery is part of the mix, but it’s not foregrounded in this lesson. Students continue to practice with this idea of structure. Commented [CK3]: Here, the expectation is raised a bit. However, since the whole notion of this standard deals with mystery and suspense, the primary burden of this assessment is not so much on identifying how structure works, but on finding the details to support how it creates mystery or suspense. It’s a small jump up, but not a huge one. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Text Assessment Unit 1 Lesson 8 CCRA.R.6 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.5 W.9-10.2.b, d “The Tell-Tale Heart” (entire text) The learning in this lesson will be captured through the Mid-Unit Assessment. The Mid-Unit Assessment prompt is the following: RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.5 “I felt a Funeral, in my Brain,” Unit 1 Lesson 11 Unit 2 Lesson 1 Unit 2 Lesson 3 RL.9-10.5 RL.9-10.5 Oedipus the King, lines 1– 66 Oedipus the King, lines 131–177 Identify a central idea in “The Tell-Tale Heart” and discuss how point of view and structural choices contribute to the development of that central idea over the course of the text. The learning in this lesson will be captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students will answer the following prompt based on the close reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson: How do Dickinson’s structural choices contribute to the development of a central idea? The learning in this lesson will be captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students will answer the following prompt based on the close reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson: How does Sophocles’s choice to open the tragedy with dialogue about the past create mystery or suspense? The learning in this lesson will be captured through the Mystery Revealed Jigsaw Tool, including a written response to a focus prompt: Sophocles chose to recall events of Laius’s death rather than portray them. What is the effect of this structural decision? May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. Commented [CK4]: Students practice with the same idea they dealt with in lesson 5. Commented [CK5]: Ditto here. They’re working on gaining some control over the skills embedded in this standard, exploring how the structure works, not just the effect of a structural choice. Module Assessment Map (10.1) Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 1 CCRA.R.5 RL.9-10.4 Lesson 1 RL.9-10.2 L.9-10.4.a “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” (stanzas 1-2) by Christopher Marlowe The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does the structure of Marlowe’s poem develop a central idea of the text? Unit 1 RL.9-10.4 Lesson 2 CCRA.R.5 RL.9-10.1 “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” RL.9-10.2 L.9-10.4.a How does the language of Marlowe’s poem evoke a sense of time and place? How does this time and place develop a central idea of the text? L.9-10.5 Unit 1 Lesson 3 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.4 SL.9-10.1 The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” by Sir Walter Raleigh L.9-10.5 The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing keywords and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does Raleigh develop a central idea of his poem? May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 1 RL.9-10.9 CCRA.R.5 “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. Student responses should be assessed using the Short Response Rubric and Checklist. Lesson 4 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.4 “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” SL.9-10.1 How does Raleigh draw upon or transform Marlowe’s poem? Unit 1 RL.9-10.2 CCRA.R.6 Lesson 5 RL.9-10.9 SL.9-10.1 “Raleigh Was Right” by William Carlos Williams W.9-10.2.d The learning in this lesson will be captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students will answer the following prompt based on the close reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. Students will be assessed on their use of precise and domain-specific vocabulary. Which of Raleigh’s central ideas does Williams focus on and how does Williams develop this idea? Unit 1 RL.9-10.1 RL.9-10.2 “Raleigh Was Right” Lesson 6 RL.9-10.9 W.9-10.2.b “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” SL.9-10.1.a “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. The learning in this lesson is captured on an Evidence Collection Tool that prompts students to cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of how an author draws on and transforms source material in a specific work. Evidence Collection Tool Prompt: How does Williams draw upon and transform a central idea established by Marlowe and Raleigh? Cite evidence to support your response. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 1 RL.9-10.9 RL.9-10.2 Lesson 7 W.9-10.2.d W.9-10.9 “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” Students craft a multi-paragraph response to the End-of-Unit Assessment prompt: “The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” How does Williams draw upon and transform the central ideas established by Marlowe and Raleigh? Cite evidence to support your response. SL.9-10.1 “Raleigh was Right” Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 1 RL.9-10.1 W.9-10.9 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 155–160) by Ethan Canin The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does the character of Hundert, the narrator, develop in this passage? Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 2 RL.9-10.1 RL.9-10.4 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 160–164) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does the character of Hundert further develop through his interaction with the Senator? Unit 2 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.1 Lesson 3 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.4 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 164–168) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How do the narrator’s actions in this passage reveal an emerging central idea of this text? May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.1 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 168–171) The learning in this lesson is captured through Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students use their completed Multiple Motivations Tool to respond to the following prompt: Lesson 4 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.4 Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 5 RL.9-10.4 RL.9-10.1 How do the conflicting motivations of the narrator shape his actions in the passage? “The Palace Thief” (pp. 171–175) L.9-10.5 The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does the narrator’s descriptive word choice further develop the characters of Sedgewick and Hundert? Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 6 RL.9-10.1 RL.9-10.4 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 175–182) L.9-10.5 The learning in this lesson is assessed through a Quick Write activity at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does the character of Hundert further develop in this passage? Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 7 W.9-10.2 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 155–182) Students craft a multi-paragraph response to the Mid-Unit Assessment prompt. How has Hundert developed over the course of this text? Cite evidence to support your response. W.9-10.9 May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 2 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.1 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 182–187) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. Lesson 8 RL.9-10.3 How do Hundert’s reflections develop a central idea of the text? Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 9 RL.9-10.1 RL.9-10.2 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 187–191) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does Hundert’s reunion with his former students contribute to the development of a central idea in the text? Unit 2 Lesson 10 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.1 RL.9-10.2 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 191–195) SL.9-10.4 May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson: How do details in the passage develop your understanding of Hundert’s conflicting motivations? Use evidence from the text, including details from the first “Mr. Julius Caesar” competition, to support your answer. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 2 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.1 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 195–198) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. Lesson 11 RL.9-10.4 SL.9-10.1 How does the competition and its aftermath further develop a central idea in the text? Unit 2 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.1 Lesson 12 “The Palace Thief” (pp. 198–205) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing evidence from the text and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does the interaction between Deepak and Hundert develop your understanding of the relationship between Hundert and Bell? Unit 2 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.1 Lesson 13 RL.9-10.3 W.9-10.2 “The Palace Thief” L.9-10.1 May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. The learning in this lesson is captured through the End-of-Unit Assessment. Students respond to the following prompt in a multiparagraph essay: What central idea does Canin develop in “The Palace Thief”? In your analysis, consider how the narrator and his interaction with other characters develop this idea. Use three to six vocabulary words from this unit in your response. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 3 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.1 The Joy Luck Club “Rules of the Game” (pp. 89–101) by Amy Tan The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading completed in the lesson. Lesson 1 L.9-10.4 L.9-10.5 Unit 3 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 2 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.4 How does the interaction between Waverly and her mother in this passage reveal a central idea of the text? The Joy Luck Club “Rules of the Game” (pp. 89–93) SL.9-10.1.e The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. How does your understanding of Waverly develop over the course of this passage? Unit 3 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.1 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 3 W.9-10.2.b The Joy Luck Club “Rules of the Game” (pp. 93–98) How do interactions between Waverly and her mother develop a central idea of the text? L.9-10.5 Unit 3 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.1 Lesson 4 W.9-10.9 RL.9-10.2 The learning in this lesson is captured on the Game Evidence Collection Tool, which prompts students to collect key details and begin to make connections in order to answer the following question: The Joy Luck Club “Rules of the Game” (pp. 98– 101) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading completed in this lesson, and in each subsequent lesson in the unit, with a Quick Write assessment. How does Waverly’s character develop through confrontation and competition? Draw upon evidence from the entire chapter to support your understanding. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 3 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.4 The Joy Luck Club “Two Kinds” (pp. 132– 135) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. Lesson 5 SL.9-10.1 How do Jing-mei’s interactions with her mother develop over the course of this passage? What is she hoping will happen? Use details from the text to support your answer. Unit 3 RL.9-10.2 Lesson 6 RL.9-10.3 SL.9-10.1.a The Joy Luck Club “Two Kinds” (pp. 136– 138) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing keywords and phrases) completed in the lesson. What is the impact of Tan’s choice to insert Waverly into “Two Kinds”? Unit 3 Lesson 7 RL.9-10.3 RL.9-10.2 W.9-10.2.b The Joy Luck Club “Two Kinds” (pp. 139– 142) SL.9-10.1 May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. Student learning in this lesson is captured with the Evidence Collection Tool and the Lesson 7 Jigsaw Tool, including the following Quick Write prompt on the Lesson 7 Jigsaw Tool. How does Jing-mei’s performance at the talent show illustrate her development as a character? Use specific details and direct quotes from your Evidence Collection Tool and the Lesson 7 Jigsaw Tool to develop your response. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 3 RL.9-10.3 W.9-10.2.b The Joy Luck Club “Two Kinds” (pp. 142– 144) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. Lesson 8 W.9-10.4 SL.9-10.1.a, c What “kind” of daughter has Jing-mei become? How has she developed over the course of the text? Support your response with evidence from the excerpts on your Expectations and Response Tool, as well as from this lesson’s excerpt (pp. 142–144). Unit 3 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.3 Lesson 9 W.9-10.2.b L.9-10.1.b The Joy Luck Club “Two Kinds” Mid-Unit Assessment: Friday Night Lights “Dreaming of Heroes” (pp. 73–76) by H.G. Bissinger The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. W.9-10.4 Presentation Prompt: How does Tan develop and refine a central idea in “Two Kinds”? Support your analysis with at least three concrete details or quotations, and include an objective summary of the text. SL.9-10.4 Unit 3 Lesson 10 RI.9-10.2 RI.9-10.3 L.9-10.1.a How does Mike’s relationship with his father develop a central idea of the text? May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 3 RI.9-10.3 RI.9-10.1 Lesson 11 RI.9-10.6 RI.9-10.2 Friday Night Lights (pp. 77–79) Student learning in this lesson is captured through the Documented and Reconstructed Details Tool. This tool enables students to track when Bissinger documents events and discussions that he has witnessed in this passage and when Bissinger reconstructs events, conversations, and emotions in order to develop the central ideas of his text and advance his point of view or purpose. Student learning will be assessed through their responses to questions on the tool. Unit 3 RI.9-10.3 RI.9-10.2 Lesson 12 L.9-10.2.a Friday Night Lights “Dreaming of Heroes” (pp. 79–84) The learning in this lesson is captured through a Quick Write at the end of the lesson. Students answer the following prompt based on the reading (citing text evidence and analyzing key words and phrases) completed in the lesson. What connection does Bissinger develop between Don and Charlie Billingsley’s relationship and Permian football? Use key details from the text to support your response. Unit 3 Lesson 13 RI.9-10.2 RI.9-10.1 RI.9-10.3 Friday Night Lights “Dreaming of Heroes” (pp. 84–87) SL.9-10.1 L.9-10.2.a May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. The learning in this lesson is captured through the written response to the final question on the Season Opener: Actions and Reactions Tool: How do the final events of the season opener shape and refine a central idea of the text? New York State Common Core Unit / Lesson Standards Assessed Standards Addressed Text Assessment Unit 3 RI.9-10.2 RL.9-10.1 Lesson 14 RL.9-10.2 RL.9-10.3 The Joy Luck Club “Two Kinds” and “Rules of the Game” The learning in this unit is captured through a multi-paragraph written response at the end of the lesson. W.9-10.2 RI.9-10.1 W.9-10.9 Friday Night Lights “Dreaming of Heroes” Choose either “Rules of the Game” or “Two Kinds” from The Joy Luck Club and compare it to Bissinger’s “Dreaming of Heroes” from Friday Night Lights. How do the relationships between children and their parents develop a central idea common to these two texts? Responses should discuss at least two pieces of textual evidence from both texts. 10.1 Performance Assessment “The Palace Thief” The Joy Luck Club “Two Kinds” and “Rules of the Game” Friday Night Lights “Dreaming of Heroes” Over the course of this module, you have read Ethan Canin’s “The Palace Thief,” two chapters from Amy Tan’s The Joy Luck Club, and a chapter from H. G. Bissinger’s Friday Night Lights. For this assessment, write a multi-paragraph response to the following prompt: Select a relationship from one of these texts. How does this relationship develop a central idea over the course of your chosen text? In order to address the prompt, review your notes and annotations about the texts in this module, including statements you have made about your chosen relationship, the characters in it, and central ideas in that text. In your review, identify interactions and connections and discuss these with a small group of classmates. Next, gather relevant textual evidence to support a statement about how your chosen relationship develops a central idea. After drafting a multi-paragraph response to the prompt, engage in the revision process, independently or with a classmate, to edit and revise your response. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. DRAFT NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 1 • Lesson 1 Short Response Rubric Name: Class: Date: Conventions Evidence Analysis Inferences/Claims Assessed Standard: 2-Point Response 1-Point Response 0-Point Response Includes valid inferences or claims from the text Includes inferences or claims that are loosely based on the text Does not address any of the requirements of the prompt or is totally inaccurate Fully and directly responds to the prompt Responds partially to the prompt or does not address all elements of the prompt Includes evidence of reflection and analysis of the text A mostly literal recounting of events or details from the text The response is blank Includes relevant and sufficient textual evidence to develop response according to the requirements of the quick write Includes some relevant facts, definitions, concrete details and/or other information from the text to develop an analysis of the text according to the requirements of the quick write The response includes no evidence from the text Uses complete sentences where errors do not impact readability Includes incomplete sentences or bullets The response is unintelligible or indecipherable File: 10.3.1 Lesson 1 Date: 4/18/14 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2014 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ DRAFT NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 1 • Lesson 1 Short Response Checklist Name: Class: Date: Assessed Standard: Does my writing… Did I… Include valid inferences and/or claims from the text? Closely read the prompt and address the whole prompt in my response? Clearly state a text-based claim I want the reader to consider? Confirm that my claim is directly supported by what I read in the text? Develop an analysis of the text? Did I consider the author’s choices, impact of word choices, the text’s central ideas, etc.? Include evidence from the Directly quote or paraphrase evidence from the text? text? Arrange my evidence in an order that makes sense and supports my claim? Reflect on the text to ensure the evidence I used is the best evidence to support my claim? Use complete sentences, correct punctuation, and spelling? Reread my writing to ensure it means exactly what I want it to mean? Review my writing for correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation? File: 10.3.1 Lesson 1 Date: 4/18/14 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2014 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ ✔ NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum DRAFT Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 1 • Lesson 15 10.3.1 End-of-Unit Text Analysis Rubric /24 Criteria 4 – Responses at this Level: 3 – Responses at this Level: 2 – Responses at this Level: 1 – Responses at this Level: Content and Analysis Determine a central idea from the text and analyze its development by providing precise and sufficient examples of the central idea’s emergence and refinement using specific details. Determine a central idea from the text and analyze its development by providing relevant and sufficient examples of the central idea’s emergence and refinement using specific details. Determine a central idea from the text and analyze its development by undeveloped or insufficient but relevant examples of the central idea’s emergence and refinement using specific details. Fail to identify and/or explain a central idea from the text. Explain how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events; effectively analyze how the details are ordered, introduced, and developed. Explain how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events; accurately analyze how the details are ordered, introduced and developed. Explain how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events; provide a partial analysis of how the details are ordered, introduced and developed. Fail to demonstrate analysis through specific textual details. Develop the response with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. Develop the response with relevant and sufficient facts, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. Partially develop the response with relevant facts, details, quotations, or other information and examples that are appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. Do not develop the response with relevant facts, details, quotations, or other information and examples that are appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. The extent to which the response determines and analyzes central idea(s) clearly and accurately in order to respond to the task and support an analysis of the text. Provide no examples or irrelevant and insufficient examples of the central idea’s emergence and refinement. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.9-10.2 Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. Content and Analysis The extent to which the response analyzes how the author unfolds an analysis clearly and accurately in order to respond to the task and support an analysis of the text. Provide little to no analysis of how the details are ordered, introduced, and developed. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.9-10.3 Analyze how the author unfolds an analysis or series of ideas or events, including the order in which the points are made, how they are introduced and developed, and the connections that are drawn between them. Command of Evidence and Reasoning The extent to which the response presents relevant and sufficient evidence from the text to develop the topic and uses examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.2.b Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas, concepts, and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content. b. Develop the topic with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. File: 10.3.1 Lesson 15 Date: 4/18/14 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2014 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum DRAFT Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 1 • Lesson 15 CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Coherence, Organization, and Style The extent to which the response includes and uses precise language and domain specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Skillfully and accurately use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Accurately use precise language or domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Inconsistently use domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Ineffectively or inappropriately use precise language or domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Skillfully establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone appropriate to the norms and conventions of the discipline. Establish a style and tone appropriate to the discipline; demonstrate inconsistent use of formality and objectivity. Use inconsistent style and tone with some attention to formality and objectivity. Lack a formal style, using language that is basic, imprecise, or contextually inappropriate. Demonstrate control of conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated language. Demonstrate basic control of conventions with occasional errors that do not hinder comprehension. Demonstrate partial control of conventions with some errors that hinder comprehension. Demonstrate little control of conventions with frequent errors that make comprehension difficult. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.2.d d. Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic. Coherence, Organization, and Style The extent to which the response properly uses formal style and objective tone as well as adheres to the writing conventions of the discipline. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.2.e e. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Control of Conventions The extent to which the response demonstrates command of conventions of standard English grammar, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.9-10.1 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.9-10.2 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing. A response that is a personal response and makes little or no reference to the task or text can be scored no higher than a 1. A response that is totally copied from the text with no original writing must be given a 0. A response that is totally unrelated to the task, illegible, incoherent, blank, or unrecognizable as English must be scored as a 0. File: 10.3.1 Lesson 15 Date: 4/18/14 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2014 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum DRAFT Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 1 • Lesson 15 10.3.1 End-of-Unit Text Analysis Checklist Assessed Standards: Does my writing… ✔ Identify a central idea from the text and analyze its development? (RI.9-10.2) Provide examples of the emergence and refinement of the central idea using specific details? (RI.9-10.2) Include a summary of the text to frame the development and refinement of the central idea? (RI.9-10.2) Examine how an author unfolds an analysis or series of events using specific textual details? (RI.9-10.3) Provide an accurate analysis of how the details are ordered, introduced and developed? (RI.9-10.3) Include thorough evidence from the text, making clear connections between the details selected and the statements made? (RI.9-10.3) Command of Evidence and Reasoning Present ideas clearly and consistently, making effective use of relevant and sufficient evidence to support analysis, reflection, and research? (W.9-10.2.b, W.9-10.9) Coherence, Organization, and Style Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone, using precise language and domain-specific vocabulary? (W.9-10.2.d,e) Control of Conventions Demonstrate control of the conventions with infrequent errors? (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2) Content and Analysis File: 10.3.1 Lesson 15 Date: 4/18/14 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2014 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 3 • Lesson 3 DRAFT 10.3.3 Rubric /16 Criteria 4 – Responses at this Level: 3 – Responses at this Level: 2 – Responses at this Level: 1 – Responses at this Level: Content and Analysis: The extent to which the response conveys complex ideas and information clearly and accurately in order to respond to the task and support an analysis of the text. Introduce precise claim(s) and distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims in an in-depth and insightful analysis. (W.9-10.1.a) Introduce a precise claim and adequately distinguish the claim from alternate or opposing claims in an accurate analysis. (W.9-10.1.a) Introduce a claim, but only partially or ineffectually distinguish the claim from alternate or opposing claims; analysis is somewhat unclear or confusing at times. (W.9-10.1.a) Do not introduce a claim; analysis is mostly unclear or confusing. (W.9-10.1.a) Develop claim(s) and counterclaim(s) fairly by supplying evidence for and addressing the strengths and limitations of both. (W.9-10.1.b) Develop claim(s) and counterclaim(s) by supplying evidence but do not thoroughly address strengths or limitations of counterclaim(s). (W.910.1.b) Develop claim(s) partially; lack evidence to fully develop claim(s) and/or counterclaim(s); fail to address strengths and limitations of claim(s) and counterclaim(s). (W.9-10.1.b) Do not demonstrate analysis. (W.9-10.1.b) Partially anticipate the audience’s knowledge level and concerns. (W.9-10.1.b) Inaccurately or inappropriately anticipate the audience’s knowledge level and concerns or fail to consider the audience. (W.9-10.1.b) (W.9-10.1.a, W.9-10.1.b) Precisely anticipate the audience’s knowledge level and concerns. (W.910.1.b) Command of Evidence and Reasoning: The extent to which the response presents evidence from the provided text(s) and uses reasoning to support analysis. (W.9-10.1) Coherence, Organization, and Style: The extent to which the response logically organizes and links complex ideas, concepts, and information using formal style, precise language and general academic and domain specific vocabulary acquired throughout the research process. (W.9-10.1.a, W.9-10.1.c, W.9-10.1.d, W.9-10.1.e, L.9-10.6) Support claims effectively and sufficiently by providing a wide range of relevant evidence. Support claims sufficiently by providing relevant evidence. Support claims partially by providing insufficient but relevant evidence, or evidence loosely related to the claim(s). Present irrelevant and/or little or no evidence from the text. Use valid reasoning to establish clear relationships between and among claim(s) and evidence. Use valid reasoning to relate claims and evidence on a basic level. Use some reasoning to partially relate claims and evidence; use unclear reasoning. Demonstrate unclear, unfounded or little to no use of reasoning; fail to establish relationships between and among claim(s) and evidence. Organize claims, counterclaims, evidence, and reasoning to establish clear relationships among all components. (W.9-10.1.a) Exhibit basic organization of claims, counterclaims, evidence, and reasoning so as to create relationships among all components. (W.9-10.1.a) Exhibit skillful use of words, phrases, and clauses to link sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify relationships among components of the argument. (W.9-10.1.c) Exhibit basic use of words, phrases, and clauses to link sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify relationships among components of the argument. (W.9-10.1.c) Exhibit partial organization of claims, counterclaims, evidence, and reasoning; relationships among all components are inconsistent and at times unclear. (W.9-10.1.a) Exhibit little organization of claims, counterclaims, evidence and reasoning; relationships among components are for the most part unclear. (W.9-10.1.a) Exhibit inconsistent use of words, phrases, and clauses to link sections of the text. (W.9-10.1.c) Exhibit little or no use of words, phrases and clauses to link sections of the text. (W.9-10.1.c) Skillfully establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone appropriate to the norms and conventions of the discipline. (W.910.1.d) Establish a style and tone appropriate to the discipline; demonstrate inconsistent use of formality and objectivity. (W.9-10.1.d) Use inconsistent style and tone with some attention to formality and objectivity. (W.9-10.1.d) Lack a formal style, using language that is basic, imprecise, or contextually inappropriate. (W.910.1.d) File: 10.3.3 Lesson 3 Date: 4/18/14 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2014 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Sufficiently anticipate the audience’s knowledge level and concerns. (W.910.1.b) Provide a concluding statement or Provide a concluding statement that inadequately supports the argument presented or repeats claim(s) and Provide a concluding statement that is unrelated to the claims presented NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum Criteria Control of Conventions: The extent to which the response demonstrates command of conventions of standard English grammar, usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling, and conforms to the guidelines in a style manual appropriate for the discipline and writing type. (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2, L.9-10.3.a) Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 3 • Lesson 3 DRAFT 4 – Responses at this Level: 3 – Responses at this Level: 2 – Responses at this Level: 1 – Responses at this Level: Provide a concluding statement or section that supports the argument presented and offers a new way of thinking about the issue. (W.9-10.1.e) section that supports the argument presented but does not offer a new way of thinking about the issue. (W.9-10.1.e) evidence verbatim or without significant variation. (W.9-10.1.e) and/or provide no concluding statement. (W.9-10.1.e) Demonstrate accurate and effective use of general academic and domainspecific words and phrases acquired through the research process. (L.910.6) Demonstrate accurate use of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases acquired through the research process. (L.9-10.6) Demonstrate partially accurate use of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases acquired through the research process. (L.9-10.6) Demonstrate little or inaccurate use of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases; do not exhibit acquisition of vocabulary through the research process. (L.9-10.6) Demonstrate control of conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated language. (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2) Demonstrate basic control of conventions with occasional errors that do not hinder comprehension. (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2) Demonstrate partial control of conventions with some errors that hinder comprehension. (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2) Demonstrate little control of conventions with frequent errors that make comprehension difficult. (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2) Demonstrate proper citation of sources to avoid plagiarism when dealing with direct quotes and paraphrased material; contain no citation errors. (L.9-10.3.a) Demonstrate proper citation of sources to avoid plagiarism when dealing with correct quotes and paraphrased material; contain only minor citation errors(L.9-10.3.a) Demonstrate partial or inconsistent use of citation of sources to avoid plagiarism when dealing with direct quotes and paraphrased material; contain some major or frequent minor citation errors. (L.9-10.3.a) Do not make use of citation or plagiarize. (L.9-10.3.a) A response that is a personal response and makes little or no reference to the task or text can be scored no higher than a 1. A response that is totally copied from the text with no original writing must be given a 0. A response that is totally unrelated to the task, illegible, incoherent, blank, or unrecognizable as English must be scored as a 0. Assessed Throughout the Module (Research and Writing Process) CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.7 Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.8 Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the usefulness of each source in answering the research question; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.9-10.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. File: 10.3.3 Lesson 3 Date: 4/18/14 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2014 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ NYS Common Core ELA & Literacy Curriculum DRAFT Grade 10 • Module 3 • Unit 3 • Lesson 3 10.3.3 Checklist Assessed Standards: Does my writing… Content and Analysis Introduce precise claims and distinguish the claims from alternate or opposing claims? (W.9-10.1.a) Supply evidence to develop claims and counterclaims? (W.9-10.1.b) Address the strengths and limitations of the claims and counterclaims? (W.9-10.1.b) Anticipate the audience’s knowledge level and concerns? (W.9-10.1.b) Command of Evidence and Support claims by providing a wide range of relevant Reasoning evidence? (W.9-10.1) Use valid reasoning to demonstrate clear relationships between claims and evidence? (W.9-10.1) Coherence, Organization, and Style Organize claims, counterclaims, evidence, and reasoning to establish clear relationships among all the components of the argument? (W.9-10.1.a) Use words, phrases, and clauses effectively to create clear relationships among components of the argument? (W.910.1.c) Establish and maintain a formal style, using precise language and sound structure? (W.9-10.1.d) Provide a conclusion that supports the argument and offers a new way of thinking about the issue? (W.9-10.1.e) Demonstrate accurate and effective use of general academic and domain-specific words and phrases acquired through the research process? (L.9-10.6) Control of Conventions Demonstrate control of standard English grammar conventions, with infrequent errors? (L.9-10.1, L.9-10.2) Provide proper citation of quotes and paraphrases to avoid plagiarism? (L.9-10.3a) File: 10.3.3 Lesson 3 Date:4/18/2014 Classroom Use: Starting 4/2014 © 2013 Public Consulting Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ ✔ Student Work Analysis Activity Purpose The purpose of this activity is to practice both using student work as data and articulating the progression of student learning over time. This activity is best done with a facilitator and time keeper to keep the discussion focused and on track. Directions Select a facilitator for this activity. For each piece of student work, follow the following protocol: 1. Each member of the group looks at the work silently against the rubric, annotating and making observations. Individually rate the work. 3 minutes 2. The group discusses their findings and comes to a consensus about the work. Collect your observations on the template. 5 minutes What can this student do with respect to this standard? What in the student’s work tells us so? What is this student struggling with? What in the student work tells us so? For each sample after the first one, What can this student do today that he/she could NOT do yesterday? May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Student Work Sample (For each sample after the first) What What is this student struggling with? can this student do today that he or What do you notice about this work? What in the student work tells us so? she could not do yesterday? What in the student work tells us so? Sample #1 Sample #2 May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Student Work Sample (For each sample after the first) What What is this student struggling with? can this student do today that he or What do you notice about this work? What in the student work tells us so? she could not do yesterday? What in the student work tells us so? Sample #3 Sample #4 May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. Talking About Student Learning This table contains some examples of CCSS aligned ways to communicate about what students can and cannot do with respect to the standards. Tip: Use the language of the standards as much as possible. Do Less Of Do More Of Orienting around compliance Orienting around skills Caleb refuses to spell correctly. Caleb still needs to learn how to explain how text structure contributes to tension in a text, although he can explain what structure is and identify points of tension. My class just won’t look at both sides of a topic. Although my class is able to develop a claim effectively, they are still struggling to develop counterclaims fairly and to supply meaningful evidence for both sides of an issue. Just holding students accountable Pairing accountability with explicit instruction I expect my students to support their opinions with evidence. My students are learning to support their claims with evidence by determining how details in a text are connected and then articulating that connection as a claim. They will be putting this skill into practice by making several claims about a text we are reading together before doing the same thing with a new text. Focusing on the numbers Focusing on the work and the standard Martina has an 84%. Martina’s last essay demonstrated growth in her ability to determine a central idea in a text. Now she needs to learn to trace how that idea emerges and is shaped by specific details. The class average was 73% on this test. This class is struggling to support their claims with relevant and sufficient evidence. Although they can identify evidence, determining the quality of evidence is something we need to work on. Dashawn has 96 points this period. Dashawn is now able to move conversations forward by posing and responding to questions. He’s still working on his ability to clarify, verify, or challenge ideas and conclusions. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. Impact and Influence Quadrant Chart Purpose The purpose of this quadrant chart is to help teams identify high impact and high influence areas of concentration when making plans to address potential root causes of student learning needs. Directions During any discussion of potential root causes, use this chart as a point of reference. Plot each potential cause according to the following two criteria: 1) How much does this cause impact the student/class current learning need? 2) How much influence does the classroom teacher have on this potential cause. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. Classroom Reflection Class Description: (Student characteristics, SES, general makeup, etc., block schedule, period length, etc.) I teach in a high needs, rural school in Northern New York, in a K-12 building with a total enrollment of 898 students; 48% of these students qualify for free or reduced lunch. I taught these lessons to sixtythree 10th grade students, eight of whom have IEPs. Class periods are 38 minutes in length. Description of Unit/Module Instruction How much of the module did you teach and how did you do it? (What did you teach as written, adapt, eliminate, add, etc. Why?) I began my adaptation of Module 10.1 in Unit 10.1.3, with Lesson 10. At the beginning of the unit, during our study of “Two Kinds,” NYS Module 10.1 had not yet been published, so all of my lessons utilized materials that I developed on my own. I did, however, try to model my instruction after that described in the 9th grade modules. Although my school does not require adoption of the NYS modules, when Module 10.1 was published, I welcomed the opportunity to adapt it to my own instruction. I began my adaptation of Module 10.1 in Unit 10.1.3, with Lesson 10. (I did not incorporate AIR as suggested in the Module.) I adapted the Quick Write prompt for Lesson 10 to provide students with more practice analyzing the relationship between Mike and Billy before considering how that relationship developed a central idea of the text. After our initial read and discussion of textdependent questions, we looked for details in the text related to the relationship, then looked for patterns in those details that might reveal something about the relationship. Then, students recorded their initial thoughts about Mike and Billy’s relationship before moving into the prompt provided in the Module. I did not include the text-dependent questions related to parallel structure, but I did spend at least two extra days reteaching/reviewing central idea before they could complete the Lesson 10 Quick Write prompt as written in the Module. Lesson 10 homework—the Preface Activity—was done as a brief in-class activity at the end of Lesson 11. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core We did not complete the Photo Activity that is part of Lesson 11. My students completed the Documented and Reconstructed Details Tool at the beginning of Lesson 11, instead of at the end as it is suggested in the Module, and we focused only on details related to Mike. Students did respond to the prompt provided for the Tool. We then moved into the reading and discussion of p. 77-79 of the text, where I added and/or revised text-dependent questions as necessary to meet my students’ needs. We began Lesson 12 with a shortened version of Activity 3, including reading and discussion of p. 7980. I used one of the text-dependent questions (“How does Bissinger’s description of Charlie Billingsley connect to his earlier description of ‘ornery kids’?”) as a Quick Write. We then completed the rest of Activity 3 as written in the module, followed by a Quick Write that I created to assess RI 3, a standard addressed in other prompts throughout the module: “How does Bissinger connect his descriptions of Charlie and Don to his descriptions of Billy and Mike?” Students also completed the Lesson 12 Quick Write provided in the module. I taught Lesson 13 mostly as written in the module, except without the Glossary of American Football Handout. Students completed the Actions and Reactions Tool, including questions 1 and 2 on the back of the Tool, then we spent a bit more time generating a list of central ideas of the text before completing question #3 as a Quick Write response. Students did not complete the Checkerboard Tool in preparation for the Unit Assessment, as we did not study “Rules of the Game,” just “Two Kinds” and “Dreaming of Heroes.” They did, however, use an “It Says, I Say, and So…” chart (an organizer we used frequently throughout the unit in preparation for Quick Writes) to organize their thinking prior to the assessment. We also used a modified version of the assessment that did not include “Rules of the Game” as a text option; instead, students were required to use both “Two Kinds” and “Dreaming of Heroes” to answer the prompt. Students were not given a chance to revise their work. How did the context affect how the module was taught? Because my class periods are only 38 minutes in length, the Module lessons usually spanned two or three class periods. A typical lesson (including both my own lessons and lessons adapted from the module) consisted of the following: 1. Student recording of the day’s learning target. (ex: “I can determine a central idea in paragraphs 1-5 of “Two Kinds.”) I did not use the CC Learning Standards Tool; I think wording the standard in a more student-friendly way made it easier for students to understand exactly what they were expected to know and do. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core 2. Paired or independent reading of the next section of text, followed by students recording and discussing the gist of what they read. (I did number the paragraphs to make it easier to refer to them during discussions.) 3. Student completion of text-dependent questions, sometimes as they were worded in the module, but often rephrased in a way that I thought clarified the question a bit more. Most often, I presented a question to students, asked them to find evidence that helped them answer the question, mark the evidence in the text, then record their thinking about the question in the margin. Students then shared their thinking with a partner before we discussed the question as a class. I tried providing a set of questions to groups of students, as suggested in the module, but I found that the progression from individual, to partner, to group provided more accountability and engagement. 4. An assessment of some sort, usually either in the form of a Quick Write or a brief response on a student’s Learning Target sheet. (See #5) Quick Writes were never actually “quick.” Often, students spent at least half if not three-quarters of a class period completing the paragraph. I also included instruction around introducing and explaining evidence in a Quick Write; the Short Response Rubric provided in the Module was used for assessment of this work. At the beginning of the unit, I often provided students with sentence frames they could use to help them establish a claim for their Quick Writes. 5. Student self-assessment of the day’s learning target through a rating on a Learning Target sheet. What do you think went well? What do you wish had gone better? My students really benefitted from the integration of assessments throughout each unit. The unit Quick Writes, combined with the Learning Target responses I developed, gave me an accurate picture of where students were so I could effectively plan the next lesson. I also think the Short Response and the Text Analysis rubrics were simple, effective gauges of student progress. At times, I struggled to adapt the lessons to such a short class period. Making these adaptations, though, really helped me gain a deeper understanding of the lessons (and, thus, the standards they are meant to teach). If I simply used the module as written, I would not have had as much engagement with the materials and I (and my students) would not have benefitted as much from them. May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. Course Correction Template Purpose The purpose of this template is to provide a way to structure thinking around how to support a student or group of students toward meeting a standard. This template can be used as a springboard for thinking or as a blueprint for instructional planning. Instructions In the spaces indicated below, identify the standard for instruction, the student or students’ current status with respect to the learning progression of this standard, and the root cause or causes you have identified. Then sketch out a plan for helping the student(s) meet the standard. Background Fill in the results of your team’s analysis. What standard is the focus of instruction? What is the current level of learning for this student/group of students? What can this student/group do with respect to the standard? What aspects are still in development? What high impact/high control root cause have you selected to focus on? May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core Instructional Plan This is a place to capture your thinking about helping this student course correct. The first three rows should get you started on the development of your plan. Use as many (or as few) of the subsequent rows as necessary. (Success factor: Detail. If you decide to develop an additional piece of instruction or an assessment, describe it here.) How will you know whether the student has achieved the instructional goal? (An upcoming assessment in the curriculum? A repeat of a previous assessment? Something else you’ve designed?) What is the next piece of instruction that will address the root cause(s) you identified? (This may be from the ELA curriculum, adaptations to that curriculum, supplements, additional supports, etc.) What will you do and what will the student do to tell you whether or not that instruction was successful? (A formative assessment from the curriculum? Something else you’ve designed?) May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved. New York State Common Core What is the next piece of instruction that will address the root cause(s) you identified? What will you do and what will the student do to tell you whether or not that instruction was successful? What is the next piece of instruction that will address the root cause(s) you identified? What will you do and what will the student do to tell you whether or not that instruction was successful? May 2014 ©2014 Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2024