Nano Research Nano Res DOI 10.1007/s12274-014-0604-y Uniform MnO2 nanostructures supported on hierarchically porous carbon as efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries Xiaopeng Han, Fangyi Cheng(), Chengcheng Chen, Yuxiang Hu and Jun Chen() Nano Res., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0604-y http://www.thenanoresearch.com on October 8 2014 © Tsinghua University Press 2014 Just Accepted This is a “Just Accepted” manuscript, which has been examined by the peer-review process and has been accepted for publication. A “Just Accepted” manuscript is published online shortly after its acceptance, which is prior to technical editing and formatting and author proofing. Tsinghua University Press (TUP) provides “Just Accepted” as an optional and free service which allows authors to make their results available to the research community as soon as possible after acceptance. After a manuscript has been technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which may affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. In no event shall TUP be held responsible for errors or consequences arising from the use of any information contained in these “Just Accepted” manuscripts. To cite this manuscript please use its Digital Object Identifier (DOI®), which is identical for all formats of publication. 1 1 2 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS (TOC) 5 6 Uniform MnO2 nanostructures supported on hierarchically porous carbon as efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries Xiaopeng Han, Fangyi Cheng*, Chengcheng Chen, Yuxiang Hu and Jun Chen* Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. MnO2 nanostructures supported on hierarchically porous carbon was synthesized and exhibited much enhanced Li-O2 battery performance, owning to the improved catalytic activity and favorable transportation of ions, oxygen and electrons. 7 8 Provide the authors’ webside if possible. 9 Author 1, webside 1 10 Author 2, webside 2 11 Nano Research DOI (automatically inserted by the publisher) Research Article 1 2 3 Uniform MnO2 nanostructures supported on hierarchically porous carbon as efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries Xiaopeng Han, Fangyi Cheng(), Chengcheng Chen, Yuxiang Hu and Jun Chen() 4 5 6 Received: day month year ABSTRACT Revised: day month year Through in situ redox deposition and growth of MnO2 nanostructures on hierarchically porous carbon (HPC), a MnO2/HPC hybrid was synthesized and employed as cathode catalyst for non-aqueous Li-O2 batteries. Owning to the mild synthetic condition, MnO2 was uniformly distributed on the surface of the carbon support, without destroying the hierarchical porous nanostructure. As a result, the as-prepared MnO2/HPC nanocomposite exhibits much enhanced Li-O2 battery performance, including low charge overpotential, good rate capacity and long cycle stability up to 300 cycles with controlling capacity of 1000 mAh g-1. The combination of multi-scale porous network of the shell-connected carbon support and the high-dispersion MnO2 nanostructure benefits the transportation of ions, oxygen and electrons and contributes to the superior electrode performance. Accepted: day month year (automatically inserted by the publisher) © Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 KEYWORDS Lithium-oxygen batteries, manganese oxide, nanocomposite, catalyst, oxygen electrochemistry 7 8 9 1 Introduction Rechargeable lithium-oxygen (Li-O2) batteries have 12 stimulated extensive interest due to their high 13 theoretical specific energy far exceeding that of 14 current lithium-ion batteries [1-4]. However, 15 formidable challenges need to be addressed before 16 the Li-O2 systems could realize commercial 17 deployment [5, 6]. One of the most important 11 parameters that critically determine the battery performance is the reversible 20 formation/decomposition of discharged products in 21 the oxygen electrodes. The severe sluggish kinetics of 22 both the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and 23 oxygen evolution reaction (OER) not only decrease 24 the energy efficiency but also limit the rate capability. 25 In addition, the irregular precipitation of insoluble 26 and insulating discharge species (mainly Li2O2) is 18 19 10 Address correspondence to Fangyi Cheng, [email protected]; Jun Chen, [email protected] 2 Nano Res. prone to block the pores of the cathode, thus resulting in low capacity and poor cycling stability. 3 Therefore, to build advanced Li-O2 batteries, it is 4 desirable to develop efficient cathode that allows fast, 5 reversible redox reactions between gaseous oxygen 6 and solid peroxide. An ideal cathode should possess 7 several critical properties: high activity for catalyzing 8 dual ORR/OER, large surface area for providing 9 abundant active sites, high electrical conductivity for 10 fast electron transfer, robust porous structure to 11 accommodate discharge products and facilitate 12 transportation of oxygen and electrolyte [7-12]. 13 Recent studies on the catalysts materials of oxygen 14 electrodes are mainly focused on noble metals or 15 alloys [13-19], metal oxides [20-29], sulfides [30] and 16 nanostructured carbonaceous materials [7, 31-34]. 17 Among the nonprecious catalysts, manganese oxides 18 are attractive because of many advantages such as 19 low cost, natural abundance, considerable 20 electrocatalytic activity and environmental 21 friendliness [20-26]. However, manganese oxides 22 suffer from low electronic conductivity. Although 23 mixing with carbon additive is a common strategy to 24 enhance electron conduction in metal oxide-based 25 electrode, the side reaction of carbon with Li 2O2 or 26 electrolyte will form Li 2CO3 and degenerate the 27 electrochemical performance [35, 36]. Peculiar 28 architectured materials with a metal oxide shell and 29 carbon core (e. g., carbon nanotubes@RuO2 [28]) 30 could alleviate the unwanted reaction while combine 31 the merits of two components. By taking advantages 32 of carbon and cheap metal oxides and bearing in 33 mind the above-discussed rational design of air 34 cathode, herein we develop an oxygen electrocatalyst 35 that consists of homogeneous MnO 2 nanostructures 36 supported on hierarchically porous carbon matrix 37 (designated as MnO2/HPC), which, to the best of our 38 knowledge, has never been employed in Li-O2 39 system. The MnO2/HPC composite materials are 40 fabricated by in situ self-sacrificed template method 41 and provide several virtues, as illustrated in Fig. 1. 42 Along with the numerous exposed MnO 2 catalytic 43 sites, the multiscale (micro/meso/macro) pores offer 44 sufficient space and interface for O 2 diffusion, Li2O2 45 accommodation, and electrolyte immersion, while 46 the interconnected carbon matrix serves as electron 47 conducting network. Otherwise, the MnO2 wrapped 48 HPC hybrid hinders the reduced oxygen species (O 2-) directly contact with the carbon, resulting in suppressed side reactions. Expectedly, the 51 MnO2/HPC hybrid endows the Li-O2 battery with 52 low overpotential, good rate capability, and stable 53 cyclability. 1 49 2 50 54 55 56 57 Figure 1 Schematic illustration of the synthesis of MnO2/HPC (HPC: hierarchically porous carbon) nanocomposite and its merits as an oxygen electrode in a Li-O2 battery. 58 59 2 Experimental 60 61 2.1 Materials Synthesis 62 The honeycomb-like structure hierarchically porous carbon (HPC) was firstly prepared via a 65 self-assembly template strategy. Typically, 0.5 g of 66 phenolic resin was ground into powder and added to 67 20 mL of absolute ethanol at 50 C. After completely 68 dissolved, 2 mL of tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) was 69 added and stirring for 15 min to form a transparent 70 light yellow solution. 50 mL mixture of 25 wt% 71 aqueous ammonia and ethanol (2:1, volume ratio) 72 was quickly poured into the solution and then 73 reacted at 50 C for 3h. The mixed slurry was 74 evaporated at 60 C and the obtained solid was 75 carbonized at 700 C for 2h in an argon atmosphere. 76 The black product was treated with 10 wt % HF to 77 remove the silica, then washed with distilled water 78 and dried to obtain HPC spheres. 79 The MnO2/HPC nanocomposite was synthesized 80 via a direct redox reaction between the obtained 81 porous carbon and the KMnO4 solution. In this case, 82 the hierarchically carbon acts not only as a sacrificial 83 reducing agent but also as a substrate for the growth 84 of MnOx. In brief, 30 mg as-prepared porous carbon 85 was firstly ultrasonically dispersed in 30 mL KMnO 4 86 solution (0.05 M) in an ice bath. Then, the mixed 87 solution was reacted for 90 min at 50 C and the final 63 64 | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp 3 Nano Res. product was obtained by centrifugation and washed with distilled water before drying in vacuum at 80 C 3 overnight. Pure MnO2 was obtained by prolonging 4 the reaction time to 3 h. 5 For comparison, the composites of loading MnO2 6 on other types of carbon (Vulcan carbot XC-72 and 7 Super P, designated as MnO2/Vc-72 and MnO2/Super 8 P, respectively) were prepared through similar 9 procedures using the corresponding carbon supports. homogenous ink of 90 wt% catalyst materials and 10 wt% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) onto the Ni 51 foam current collector with a catalyst mass loading of 52 about 0.8 mg cm-2. After completing assembly, the 53 cells were placed in a sealed container filled with 1 54 atm high-purity oxygen. 55 Electrochemical tests were performed at room 56 temperature after 5 h rest on a Land-CT2001A battery 57 system. All the specific capacity and current density 58 were calculated based on the total amount of the 59 catalyst. The cyclic voltammograms (CVs) were 60 conducted within 2.0-4.6 V on Parstat 263A 61 workstation (AMTECT). Electrochemical impedance 62 spectroscopy (EIS) was tested using Parstat 2273 63 potentiostat/galvanostat workstation within a 64 frequency range of 100 kHz to 100 mHz. 1 49 2 50 10 11 2.2 Materials Characterization 12 The structures and morphologies of the as-prepared 14 samples were respectively characterized by powder 15 X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku/MiniFlex600 with Cu 16 Kα radiation), Raman microscope (DXR, 17 Thermo-Fisher Scientific at 532 nm excitation), 18 field-emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, 19 JEOL JSM7500F) and transmission electron 20 microscopy (TEM, Philips Tecnai-F20). The carbon 21 content of the composite was determined by 22 elemental analyser (Elementar, vario El cube) and 23 energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). X-ray 24 photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results were 25 collected on a Perkin Elmer PHI 1600 ESCA system. 26 X-ray absorption (XAS) was performed on Shanghai 27 Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF). Surface area 28 analysis was measured by using the N2 29 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K on a 30 BELsorp-Mini instrument. Thermogravimetric (TG) 31 tests were performed using a Netzsch STA 449 F3 32 Jupiter analyzer. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) 33 spectroscopies were performed on a FTIR-650 34 spectrometer (Tianjin Gangdong) at a resolution of 2 35 cm-1. 13 36 37 38 2.3 Cell assembly measurements and electrochemical 39 The electrochemical performance of non-aqueous 41 Li-O2 cell was analyzed by a 2023-type coin cell. All 42 the cells were fabricated in an argon-filled glove box 43 (Mikrouna Universal 2440/750) using a lithium metal 44 anode, a glass fiber separator, a catalyst contained 45 oxygen cathode and an electrolyte of 1 M LiTFSI 46 (lithium bis-(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) -imide) in 47 TEGDME (tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether). The 48 oxygen cathodes were prepared by casting a 40 65 66 3 Results and discussions 67 Fig. 2a displays the typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of MnO2/HPC. The hybrid 70 maintains the morphology of the honeycomb-like, 71 shell-connected hollow HPC microspheres (Fig. S1 in 72 the Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM)). 73 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (Fig. 74 2b) clearly reveals that uniform MnOx is 75 homogenously supported on the porous carbon. The 76 high-resolution TEM imaging (Fig. 2c) shows lattice 77 fringes with interlayer distance of 0.7 nm, which 78 agrees with the neighbouring spacing of the (001) 79 plane of birnessite-type MnO2. The texture of 80 MnO2/HPC is analyzed by nitrogen 81 adsorption-desorption isotherms. The determined 82 Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area is 83 95.7 m2/g (Fig. 2d). The corresponding pore size 84 distribution data calculated by the BJH method (inset 85 in Fig. 2d) shows hierarchical pore features with 86 micropores diameter below 2.0 nm, mesopores 87 centered at 4 nm and macropores located in a wide 88 range of 20–100 nm. In our synthesis, it is noted that 89 a higher reaction temperature and a longer 90 deposition time would lead to overconsumption of 91 the carbon substrate and destruction of the 92 hierarchically porous nanostructure (Fig. S2 in the 93 ESM). 94 The formation of birnessite-type MnO2 in 95 MnO2/HPC is confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, 96 Fig. S3 in the ESM). Broad peaks imply poorly 68 69 www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research 4 Nano Res. crystallized property, which may originate from the small particle size and amorphous nature of the 3 powders as a result of the mild synthesis condition 4 [37]. Raman spectra (Fig. S4 in the ESM) indicate the 5 presence of both carbon and MnO 2. Beside the two 6 characteristic signals of carbon, two peaks are 7 observed at 570 cm-1 and 640 cm-1 in the low 8 wavelength region, which can be attributed to the 9 Mn-O stretching and the symmetric stretching 10 vibration of the MnO6 groups, respectively. In 11 addition, the peak splitting width of 4.85 eV in Mn 3s 12 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Fig. S5a in 13 the ESM) and the X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES, Fig. S5b in the ESM) suggest the presence of oxygen vacancies and a multiple valence 16 (+3 and +4) of Mn, which could contribute to 17 enhanced electrochemical activity [24, 38, 39]. 18 Furthermore, elemental mapping evidences the 19 homogenous dispersion of MnO 2 in the carbon 20 framework matrix (Fig. 2e). The weight percentage of 21 manganese oxide is determined to be about 46% in 22 the synthesized MnO2/HPC nanocomposite by 23 combining energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), 24 element analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis 25 (TGA) in air (Fig. S6 in the ESM). 1 14 2 15 26 27 28 Figure 2 (a) SEM and (b, c) TEM images of the synthesized MnO2/HPC composite materials. (d) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distribution (inset) of MnO2/HPC. (e) Elemental mapping of MnO2/HPC. The synthesized MnO2/HPC was employed as an 30 ORR/OER bifunctional cathode catalyst in Li-O2 31 batteries. Fig. 3a shows the first discharge-charge 32 voltage profiles of the Li-O2 cells assembled with 33 MnO2/HPC and the comparative HPC and 34 conventional Super P carbon with the restricting 35 capacity of 1000 mAh g-1. The composite-based cell 36 exhibits a significantly lowered charge plateau 37 voltage and slightly increased discharge plateau 38 voltage, resulting in an overpotential of 0.68 V. This is 39 ca. 0.75 V and 1.01 V smaller than those of the cells 29 made with HPC and Super P cathodes, respectively. 41 The round-trip efficiency (the ratio of discharge to 42 charge voltages) of MnO2/HPC cell attains a 43 remarkably high value of about 80%. The kinetics of 44 the three electrodes were also investigated by cyclic 45 voltammetry (CV) in TEGDME (tetraethylene glycol 46 dimethyl ether)-based electrolyte (Fig. 3b). The 47 MnO2/HPC hybrid shows a higher ORR onset 48 potential (~ 2.75 V), a much lower OER peak 49 potential (~ 3.80 V), and much larger cathodic/anodic 50 peak currents compared with HPC and Super P. 40 | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp 5 Nano Res. These results indicate superior electrocatalytic activity of MnO2/HPC. 3 The rate capability of prepared catalysts was tested 4 at various current densities, as shown in Fig. 3c and 5 Fig. S7 in the ESM. The Li-O2 cell with MnO2/HPC 6 exhibits higher discharge capacity than those with 7 HPC and Super P to the terminal discharge voltage of 8 2.0 V. Specially, even at a high current density of 5000 9 mA g-1, the MnO2/HPC-based battery can deliver a 10 discharge capacity of 2260 mAh g -1, which is 4- and 11 75-fold larger than those of HPC (554 mAh g -1) and 12 Super P (30 mAh g-1), respectively. At a current 13 density of 500 mA g-1, the Li-O2 battery with 14 MnO2/HPC maintains a specific capacity of >2000 15 mAh g-1 for 60 cycles over a wide voltage window of 16 2.0–4.4 V (Fig. S8 in the ESM). In contrast, the discharge capacity of HPC or Super P rapidly decreases to < 150 mAh g-1 after 10 cycles. When 19 restricting a cycling capacity of 1000 mAh g -1, the 20 MnO2/HPC cell sustains 300 cycles with the 21 discharge terminal above 2.0 V while the HPC and 22 Super P cells can merely afford 66 and 34 cycles, 23 respectively (Fig. 3d and Fig. S9 in the ESM). The 24 performance of MnO2/HPC is also much better than 25 pure MnO2, MnO2/Vc-72 and MnO2/Super P 26 counterparts (Fig. S10 in the ESM), suggesting the 27 advantages of the hierarchically porous carbon 28 support. The battery performance presented here is 29 among the best results reported in Li-air systems 30 with manganese oxides electrocatalysts (Table S1 in 31 the ESM) [20-23]. 1 17 2 18 32 33 34 35 36 Figure 3 (a) First discharge-charge curves of Li-O2 batteries with Super P, HPC and MnO2/HPC at a current density of 100 mA g-1. (b) CV profiles at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s-1. (c) Galvanostatic profiles of MnO2/HPC electrode at different rates. (d) Cyclability and terminal discharge voltages of three electrodes at a current density of 350 mA g-1. The current density and specific capacity are calculated on the basis of the total catalyst weight. The cathodes of Li-O2 cells were disassembled and 38 characterized at discharged and charged states. 39 Among the discharged electrodes, there is much 40 difference in morphology. The precipitate on Super P 41 (Fig. 4a) presents typical toroid shape [8, 40]. In 42 comparison, mossy species composed of nanosheets 43 uniformly covers the surface of MnO2/HPC (Fig. 4b). 37 TEM imaging (Fig. S11a in the ESM) reveals porous 45 structure of the discharged mossy solid. The 46 concentric rings in electron diffraction pattern (Fig. 47 S11b in the ESM) are unambiguously indexed to 48 Li2O2 and indicate polycrystalline nature of the 49 generated Li2O2. After recharged, the super P-based 50 electrode contains aggregated particles and is 44 www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research 6 Nano Res. clogged by a dense layer (Fig. 4c) whereas the mossy discharged species disappears and the 3 honeycomb-like hierarchically porous morphology is 4 fully regained for MnO2/HPC electrode (Fig. 4d and 5 Fig. S11c, d in the ESM). XRD analysis (Fig. 4e) 6 clearly indicates the formation of Li 2O2, which 7 disappears in the recharged cathodes. Fourier 8 Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopies (Fig. 4f) of 9 the recharged electrodes further evidence the 10 presence of Li2CO3, HCO2Li (Li formate) or 11 CH3CO2Li (Li acetate). Especially, the formation of 12 carbonate and carboxylate lithium on Super P 13 electrode is much more obvious than the case of MnO2/HPC hybrid after the same 30 cycles. The accumulation of these species upon cycling would 16 retard the mass transportation and charge transfer, 17 leading to increased electrode polarization and 18 performance degradation of the cell. This conjecture 19 is verified by the electrochemical impedance 20 spectroscopy (Fig. S12 and Table S2 in the ESM) that 21 show gradual increase of electrode resistance. 22 Compared with neat Super P, the increase rate of 23 charge transfer resistance is much slower in the 24 hybrid electrode. Thus, the MnO 2 wrapped HPC 25 hybrid can effectively suppress the side reaction of 26 carbon. 1 14 2 15 27 28 29 30 31 32 Figure 4 Characterization of the discharged/charged electrodes after 5 cycles at terminal capacity of 1000 mAh g -1 and constant current density of 350 mA g-1. SEM images of discharged Super P (a) and MnO2/HPC (b) electrodes. SEM images of charged Super P (c) and MnO2/HPC (d) electrodes. (e) XRD patterns of MnO2/HPC, Super P electrodes and the reference Li2O2. The peaks of MnO2 and Super P are marked with * and #, respectively. (f) FTIR of the 5th-cycle and 30th-cycle MnO2/HPC, Super P cathodes and the standard lithium carbonates and carboxylate. The above results clearly indicate the superior activity of MnO2/HPC in catalyzing the reversible 35 formation/decomposition of Li 2O2 during the 36 discharge/charge process of Li-O2 cells. Possibly, the 37 remarkable performance of MnO2/HPC could be 38 attributed to the combined benefits of MnO x and 39 HPC. The interconnected hierarchically porous 40 structure of carbon network not only favors electron 41 conduction, oxygen diffusion and electrolyte 42 permeation, but also provides abundant sites and 43 larger room for Li2O2 precipitation (Fig. 1). Manganese oxide itself is known to have considerable activity for the ORR/OER [38, 41-45]. 46 Also, the metal oxide surfaces have been shown to be 47 less “sticky” than pure carbon surfaces riddled with 48 dangling bonds [46], which could weaken the 49 binding of the intermediate superoxide to the 50 substrate and facilitating the transport of superoxide 51 species, leading to a thin and uniform 52 nucleation/crystallization of discharged product (i.e., 53 Li2O2) on the hybrid electrode. These two factors 54 might contribute to the homogeneous distribution of 33 44 34 45 | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp 7 Nano Res. peroxides. Compared to the dense toroid-shaped 2 Li2O2 (Fig. 4a), the formed porous and loose solid 3 (Fig. 4b) could provide more exposed surfaces and 4 interfaces, enabling easy decomposition of 5 discharged product on recharging (Fig. 4d). 6 Consequently, the Li-O2 batteries assembled with 7 MnO2/HPC manifest high round-trip efficiency and 8 good rechargeability. 50 9 59 1 10 4 Conclusions [2] 51 52 [3] 53 54 55 [4] 56 57 58 [5] 60 61 11 In summary, hierarchically porous MnO2/HPC 13 nanocomposite was synthesized and catalytically 14 investigated as cathode electrocatalyst in aprotic 15 Li-O2 batteries. Compared with neat HPC and 16 conventional Super P carbon electrodes, the obtained 17 MnO2/HPC electrodes exhibit lower overpotential (~ 18 0.68 V at 100 mA g-1), better rate capability (2260 19 mAh g-1 at 5 A g-1) and longer operational life (~ 300 20 cycles with a fixed terminal capacity of 1000 mAh g -1). 21 The remarkable performance of MnO 2/HPC was 22 ascribed to a combination of positive effects 23 including intrinsic ORR/OER catalytic activity, the 24 unique architecture, the favorable morphology of 25 Li2O2, and the reduced side reactions. Our results 26 would enlighten the rational design of 27 multifunctional porous carbon/metal oxide hybrid 28 materials as cheap yet efficient cathode 29 electrocatalysts for advanced Li-O2 batteries. 62 [6] 12 30 31 63 64 65 [7] 66 67 68 69 70 [8] 71 72 73 74 [9] 75 76 77 78 79 [10] 80 81 82 83 Acknowledgements 84 32 85 This work was supported by the National 973 34 (2011CB935900), NSFC (21322101 and 21231005), and 35 MOE (ACET-13-0296 and B12015). 33 36 86 [11] 87 88 89 Electronic Supplementary Material: 38 Supplementary material (additional material 39 characterizations and electrochemical tests, such as 40 XRD, Raman, SEM, TEM, XPS, TGA, EIS results etc) 41 is available in the online version of this article at 42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12274-***-****-* 43 (automatically inserted by the publisher). 90 37 44 45 References 48 49 92 [1] 94 95 96 [13] 97 98 99 Bruce, P. G.; Freunberger, S. A.; Hardwick, L. J.; Tarascon, J. M. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 19-29. [12] 93 100 46 47 91 101 102 103 [14] Black, R.; Adams, B.; Nazar, L. F. Non-aqueous and hybrid Li-O2 batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 801-815. Cheng, F. Y.; Chen, J. Metal–air batteries: from oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2172-2192. Zhang, K.; Han, X. P.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, X. L.; Tao, Z. L.; Chen, J. Nanostructured Mn-based oxides for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev., in press, DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00218K. Li, F. J.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, H. S. Challenges of non-aqueous Li-O2 batteries: electrolytes, catalysts, and anodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1125-1141. Cao, R. G.; Lee, J. S.; Liu, M. L.; Cho, J. Recent progress in non-precious catalysts for metal-air batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 816-829. Guo, Z. Y.; Zhou, D. D.; Dong, X. L.; Qiu, Z. J.; Wang, Y. G.; Xia, Y. Y. Ordered hierarchical mesoporous/macroporous carbon: a high-performance catalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5668-5672. Xu, J. J.; Wang, Z. L.; Xu, D.; Zhang, L. L.; Zhang, X. B. Tailoring deposition and morphology of discharge products towards high-rate and long-life lithium-oxygen batteries. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2438-2447. Yan, Y.; Yin, Y. X.; Guo, Y. G.; Wan, L. J. A sandwich-like hierarchically porous carbon/graphene composite as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater., in press, DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201301584. Tang, Y. X.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Deng, J. Y.; Qi, D. P.; Leow, W. R.; Wei, J. Q.; Yin, S. Y.; Dong, Z. L.; Yazami, R.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X. D. Unravelling the Correlation between the Aspect Ratio of Nanotubular Structures and Their Electrochemical Performance To Achieve High-Rate and Long-Life Lithium-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., DOI: 10.1002/anie.201406719. Tang, Y. X.; Zhang, Y. Y.; Deng, J. Y.; Wei, J. Q.; Tam, H. L.; Chandran, B. K.; Dong, Z. L.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X. D. Mechanical Force-Driven Growth of Elongated Bending TiO2-based Nanotubular Materials for Ultrafast Rechargeable Lithium Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6111-6118. Zhang, K.; Zhao, Q.; Tao, Z. L.; Chen, J. Composite of sulfur impregnated in porous hollow carbon spheres as the cathode of Li-S batteries with high performance. Nano Res. 2013, 6, 38-46. Peng, Z. Q.; Freunberger, S. A.; Chen, Y. H.; Bruce, P. G. A reversible and higher-rate Li-O2 battery. Science 2012, 337, 563-566. Lu, Y. C.; Xu, Z. C.; Gasteiger, H. A.; Chen, S.; Hamad-Schifferli, K.; Shao-Horn, Y. Platinum−gold nanoparticles: a highly active bifunctional electrocatalyst for rechargeable lithium−air batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12170-12171. www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Nano Res. [15] Lim, B.; Jiang, M. J.; Yu, T.; Camargo, P. H. C.; Xia, Y. N. Nucleation and growth mechanisms for Pd-Pt bimetallic nanodendrites and their electrocatalytic properties. Nano Res. 2010, 3, 69-80. [16] Wu, J. B.; Yang, H. Synthesis and electrocatalytic oxygen reduction properties of truncated octahedral Pt3Ni nanoparticles. Nano Res. 2011, 4, 72-82. [17] Li, J. Y.; Wang, G. X.; Wang, J.; Miao, S.; Wei, M. M.; Yang, F.; Yu, L.; Bao, X. H. Architecture of PtFe/C catalyst with high activity and durability for oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Res., in press, DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0513-0. [18] Chen, S. G.; Wei, Z. D.; Qi, X. Q.; Dong, L. C.; Guo, Y. G.; Wan, L. J.; Shao, Z. G.; Li, L. Nanostructured polyaniline-decorated Pt/C@PANI core–shell catalyst with enhanced durability and activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13252-13255. [19] Guo, S. J.; Li, D. G.; Zhu, H. Y.; Zhang, S.; Markovic, N. M.; Stamenkovic, V. R.; Sun, S. H. FePt and CoPt nanowires as efficient catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3465-3468. [20] Débart, A.; Paterson, A. J.; Bao, J. L.; Bruce, P. G. α-MnO2 nanowires: a catalyst for the O2 electrode in rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4521-4524. [21] Wang, H. L.; Yang, Y.; Liang, Y. Y.; Zheng, G. Y.; Li, Y. G.; Cui, Y.; Dai, H. J. Rechargeable Li–O2 batteries with a covalently coupled MnCo2O4–graphene hybrid as an oxygen cathode catalyst. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7931-7935. [22] Cao, Y.; Wei, Z. K.; He, J.; Zang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, M. S.; Dong, Q. F. α-MnO2 nanorods grown in situ on graphene as catalysts for Li-O2 batteries with excellent electrochemical performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9765-9768. [23] Xu, J. J.; Xu, D.; Wang, Z. L.; Wang, H. G.; Zhang, L. L.; Zhang, X. B. Synthesis of perovskite-based porous La0.75Sr0.25MnO3 nanotubes as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable lithium–oxygen batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3887-3890. [24] Cheng, F. Y.; Shen, J.; Peng, B.; Pan, Y. D.; Tao, Z. L.; Chen, J. Rapid room-temperature synthesis of nanocrystalline spinels as oxygen reduction and evolution electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 79-84. [25] Feng, J.; Liang, Y. Y.; Wang, H. L.; Li, Y. G.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, J. G.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Dai, H. J. Engineering manganese oxide/nanocarbon hybrid materials for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. Nano Res. 2012, 5, 718-725. [26] Han, X. P.; Hu, Y. X.; Yang, J. G.; Cheng, F. Y.; Chen, J. Porous perovskite CaMnO3 as an electrocatalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 1497-1499. [27] Zhang, G. Q.; Xia, B. Y.; Xiao, C.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Xie, Y.; Lou, X. W. General formation of complex tubular 55 56 57 58 [28] 59 60 61 62 63 [29] 64 65 66 67 [30] 68 69 70 71 72 [31] 73 74 75 [32] 76 77 78 79 [33] 80 81 82 83 [34] 84 85 86 87 88 [35] 89 90 91 92 93 [36] 94 95 96 97 [37] 98 99 100 101 102 [38] 103 104 105 106 107 108 [39] nanostructures of metal oxides for the oxygen reduction reaction and lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 8643-8647. Jian, Z. L.; Liu, P.; Li, F. J.; He, P.; Guo, X. W.; Chen, M. W.; Zhou, H. S. Core–shell-structured CNT@RuO2 composite as a high-performance cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li–O2 batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 442-446. Sun, B.; Liu, H.; Munroe, P.; Ahn, H.; Wang, G. X. Nanocomposites of CoO and a mesoporous carbon (CMK-3) as a high performance cathode catalyst for lithium-oxygen batteries. Nano Res. 2012, 5, 460-469. Zhou, W. J.; Wu, X. J.; Cao, X. H.; Huang, X.; Tan, C. L.; Tian, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, J. Y.; Zhang, H. Ni3S2 nanorods/Ni foam composite electrode with low overpotential for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2921-2924. Jung, H. G.; Hassoun, J.; Park, J. B.; Sun, Y. K.; Scrosati, B. An improved high-performance lithium–air battery. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 579-585. Chen, P.; Xiao, T. Y.; Qian, Y. H.; Li, S. S.; Yu, S. H. A Nitrogen-doped graphene/carbon nanotube nanocomposite with synergistically enhanced electrochemical activity. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3192-3196. Liang, J.; Du, X.; Gibson, C.; Du, X. W.; Qiao, S. Z. N-Doped graphene natively grown on hierarchical ordered porous carbon for enhanced oxygen reduction. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 6226-6231. Liu, Z. Y.; Zhang, G. X.; Lu, Z. Y.; Jin, X. Y.; Chang, Z.; Sun, X. M. One-step scalable preparation of N-doped nanoporous carbon as a high-performance electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Res. 2013, 6, 293-301. McCloskey, B. D.; Speidel, A.; Scheffler, R.; Miller, D. C.; Viswanathan, V.; Hummelshøj, J. S.; Nørskov, J. K.; Luntz, A. C. Twin problems of interfacial carbonate formation in nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 997-1001. Gallant, B. M.; Mitchell, R. R.; Kwabi, D. G.; Zhou, J.; Zuin, L.; Thompson, C. V.; Shao-Horn, Y. Chemical and morphological changes of Li–O2 battery electrodes upon cycling. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 20800-20805. Liu, J. P.; Jiang, J.; Cheng, C. W.; Li, H. X.; Zhang, J. X.; Gong, H.; Fan, H. J. Co3O4 Nanowire@MnO2 Ultrathin Nanosheet Core/Shell Arrays: A New Class of High-Performance Pseudocapacitive Materials. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2076-2081. Cheng, F. Y.; Zhang, T. R.; Zhang, Y.; Du, J.; Han, X. P.; Chen, J. Enhancing electrocatalytic oxygen reduction on MnO2 with vacancies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2474-2477. Han, X. P.; Cheng, F. Y.; Zhang, T. R.; Yang, J. G.; Hu, Y. X.; Chen, J. Hydrogenated uniform Pt clusters supported on porous CaMnO3 as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp 9 Nano Res. 1 2 3 [40] 4 5 6 7 [41] 8 9 10 [42] 11 12 13 14 15 [43] enhanced oxygen reduction and evolution. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2047-2051. Cui, Y. M.; Wen, Z. Y.; Liang, X.; Lu, Y.; Jin, J.; Wu, M. F.; Wu, X. W. A tubular polypyrrole based air electrode with improved O2 diffusivity for Li–O2 batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7893-7897. Gorlin, Y.; Jaramillo, T. F. A bifunctional nonprecious metal catalyst for oxygen reduction and water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13612-13614. El-Deab, M. S.; Ohsaka, T. Manganese oxide nanoparticles electrodeposited on platinum are superior to platinum for oxygen reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5963-5966. Cheng, F. Y.; Su, Y.; Liang, J.; Tao, Z. L.; Chen, J. MnO2-based nanostructures as catalysts for electrochemical 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 oxygen reduction in alkaline media. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 898-905. [44] Roche, I.; Chaînet, E.; Chatenet, M.; Vondrák, J. Carbon-supported manganese oxide nanoparticles as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline medium: physical characterizations and ORR mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1434-1443. [45] Han, X. P.; Zhang, T. R.; Du, J.; Cheng, F. Y.; Chen, J. Porous calcium-manganese oxide microspheres for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction with high activity. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 368-376. [46] Black, R.; Lee, J.-H.; Adams, B.; Mims, C. A.; Nazar, L. F. The role of catalysts and peroxide oxidation in lithium–oxygen batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 392-396. 31 www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research Nano Res. 1 Electronic Supplementary Material 2 3 4 5 Uniform MnO2 nanostructures supported on hierarchically porous carbon as efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries Xiaopeng Han, Fangyi Cheng(), Chengcheng Chen, Yuxiang Hu and Jun Chen() Supporting information to DOI 10.1007/s12274-****-****-* (automatically inserted by the publisher) 6 7 8 Figure S1 SEM (a, b) and TEM (c, d) images of HPC. e) Elemental mapping and EDS spectra of HPC. SEM images display the macroporous honeycomb-like monolith morphology, which is made up of shell-connected 11 carbon hemispheres. The inset of (b) shows the diameter distribution of carbon spheres (diameter about 410 12 nm). TEM images reveal the macroporous inner structure and the inter-connected carbon framework of the 13 as-prepared HPC. No obvious Si signal was observed from the EDS spectra, indicating the silica template has 14 been completely removed. 9 10 www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research Nano Res. 1 2 3 Figure S2 SEM images of MnO2/HPC samples with different preparation procedures. (a) reaction temperature 50 C, deposition time 180 min; (b) reaction temperature 65 C, deposition time 90 min. 4 Figure S3 XRD patterns of synthesized pure HPC, MnO2/HPC samples. The broad diffraction peaks at 2 6 around 11.8, 37.2 and 66.0 in the MnO2/HPC composite can be readily indexed to the birnessite-type MnO2 7 (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, JCPDS card No. 42-1317). 5 8 9 Figure S4 Raman spectra of prepared HPC and MnO2/HPC. | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp Nano Res. 1 Figure S5 (a) Mn 3s XPS spectra and (b) Mn K-edge XANES of synthesized MnO2/HPC composite. Mn K-edge 3 XANES of β-MnIVO2 and MnII,III3O4 are shown as reference standards. The Mn 3s XPS splitting peaks energies 4 locate at 88.5 eV and 83.65 eV, respectively, with separation of 4.85 eV, which indicates a mixed valence of Mn 5 between +3 and +4 [1, 2]. This result is also confirmed by comparing the K-edge absorption position to those of 6 β-MnIVO2 and Mn3O4 reference standards. 2 7 Figure S6 EDS spectra (a) and TG profile (b) of as-prepared MnO2/HPC hybrid at heating rate of 5 C min-1 in 9 air flow at speed of 50 mL min -1. In EDS spectra, the signal of potassium (K) element can be found. The 10 presence of K cations in the formed birnessite-type MnO2 originates from the KMnO4 precursor, which could 11 stabilize the lattice structure of manganese oxides [3, 4]. In TG profile, the mass loss before 150 C can be 12 attributed to the removal of physi-adsorbed water. The following rapid mass loss, peaked at 380 C, correspond 13 to the carbon combustion in the MnO 2/HPC composite. 8 14 www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research Nano Res. 1 Figure S7 Rate performance of (a) HPC and (b) Super P electrodes. 2 3 Figure S8 Cycling performance of three catalysts at 500 mA g-1 over a wide voltage window from 2.0 to 4.4 V. 4 Figure S9 Discharge-charge curves of the Li-O2 batteries with three cathode catalysts at selected cycles at a 6 current density of 350 mA g-1 with controlling cycling capacity of 1000 mAh g -1. (a): MnO2/HPC hybrid, (b): 7 pure HPC, (c): conventional Super P carbon. 5 | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp Nano Res. 1 Figure S10 TEM images of prepared MnO2/Vc-72 (a) and MnO2/Super P (b). (c) First discharge/charge profiles at 100 mA g-1 and (d) Cyclability and terminal discharge voltages at a current density of 350 mA g -1 based on 4 pure MnO2, MnO2/Vc-72 and MnO2/Super P. To overcome the poor electronic conductivity, the pure MnO 2 5 electrode was prepared by mixing pure MnO 2 with the Vulcan carbot XC72 (weight ratio, 3:7). As for 6 MnO2/Vc-72 and MnO2/Super P, MnO2 nanowires were grown on the carbon supports. The morphologies of 7 deposited MnO2 on Vc-72 and Super P are much different from the case of HPC that confines homogenous 8 surface growth of MnO2. With the cut-off capacity of 1000 mAh g -1, the charge/discharge overpotentials are 1.56 9 V, 1.36 V and 1.20 V and the cycling number are 33, 64 and 74 for pure MnO 2, MnO2/Super P and MnO2/Vc-72 10 cathodes, respectively. The superior performance of MnO 2/HPC can be clearly seen, indicating the advantages 11 of the hierarchically porous carbon support which not only facilitates the transportation of oxygen and 12 electrolyte but also offers empty space to accommodate the discharge product, thus leading to enhanced 13 electrode performance. 2 3 www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research Nano Res. 1 Figure S11 (a) TEM image of discharged MnO2/HPC cathode and (b) the corresponding electron diffraction pattern. (c) TEM image of recharged MnO2/HPC cathode. (d) Raman spectra of pristine MnO2/HPC cathode 4 and the electrodes after five cycles. Raman results indicate that the Li 2O2 generates after discharging and 5 disappears in the recharged electrode, whereas there is no signal showing structural change of the MnO2/HPC 6 catalyst before and after cycling. 2 3 7 Figure S12 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopies (EIS) of (a) MnO 2/HPC and (b) Super P of discharged/recharged cathodes of pristine, the 5th and 30th cycles. At 5th discharged state, the increase extent 10 of charge transfer resistance (Rct) of MnO2/HPC electrode (72.8 to 144.1 ) is slightly lower than that of Super 11 P (192.1 to 571.2 ), which is in consistent with the different case of deposited discharged products and the 12 restrained ability towards the side reaction. After 5th recharging, the resistance of MnO 2/HPC-based batteries 13 could recover to that of the fresh batteries to a large extent (96.0 vs. 72.8 ), whereas the Super P electrodes 14 cannot recover absolutely (441.5 vs. 192.1 ). This phenomenon becomes much more apparent for extended 8 9 | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp Nano Res. 30th cycle (see Table S2 for details). The EIS results here again suggest a relatively reversible reaction for Li 2O2 formation/decomposition during the repeated discharge/charge process over the MnO2/HPC cathode as well as 3 the suppressed side reaction with the carbon. 1 2 4 Table S1 Summary of electrochemical performance of Li-O2 batteries based on manganese oxides catalysts. 5 catalyst maximum capacity based on total mass / mAh g-1 rate capability / mAh g-1 cycle performance /controlling capacity α-MnO2 [5] 730 ---- 10 cycles/2000 mAh g-1 α-MnO2/Graphene [6] 2304 ---- 25 cycles/3000 mAh g-1 -MnO2 [7] 7000 1900 at 800 mA g-1 120 cycles/>1000 mAh g-1 3D-Graphene-MnO2 [8] 3660 770 at 387 mA g-1 132 cycles/1000 mAh g−1 MnCo2O4/Graphene [9] 3780 2743 at 800 mA g-1 40 cycles/1000 mAh g-1 La0.75Sr0.25MnO3 [10] 7333 6666 at 133 mA g-1 124 cycles/1000 mAh g−1 manganese oxide nanowires [11] ~5000 ---- 47 cycles/2000 mAh g-1carbon our sample 9283 2260 at 5000 mA g-1 300 cycles/1000 mAh g−1 6 7 8 Table S2 Comparison of the fitted charge transfer resistance (Rct, ) at different discharged/recharged states with prolonged cycles based on MnO2/HPC and Super P cathodes. 9 States Pristine 5th discharge 5th recharge 30th discharge 30th recharge MnO2/HPC 72.8 144.1 96.0 188.5 119.0 Super P 192.1 571.2 441.5 755.3 605.0 Catalyst 10 11 Supplementary References [1] Toupin, M.; Brousse, T.; Bélanger, D. Charge storage mechanism of MnO2 electrode used in aqueous Electrochemical capacitor. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3184-3190. 14 [2] Toupin, M.; Brousse, T.; Bélanger, D. Influence of microstucture on the charge storage properties of chemically 15 synthesized manganese dioxide. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 3946-3952. 16 [3] Xiao, W.; Wang, D. L.; Lou, X. W. Shape-Controlled Synthesis of MnO2 Nanostructures with Enhanced 17 Electrocatalytic Activity for Oxygen Reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 114, 1694-1700. 18 [4] Liu, J. P.; Jiang, J.; Cheng, C. W.; Li, H. X.; Zhang, J. X.; Gong, H.; Fan, H. J. Co 3O4 Nanowire@MnO2 Ultrathin 19 Nanosheet Core/Shell Arrays: A New Class of High-Performance Pseudocapacitive Materials. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 20 2076-2081. 21 [5] Débart, A.; Paterson, A. J.; Bao, J. L.; Bruce, P. G. α-MnO2 nanowires: a catalyst for the O2 electrode in rechargeable 22 lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4521-4524. 23 [6] Cao, Y.; Wei, Z. K.; He, J.; Zang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, M. S.; Dong, Q. F. α-MnO2 nanorods grown in situ on 24 graphene as catalysts for Li-O2 batteries with excellent electrochemical performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 25 9765-9768. 26 [7] Hu, X. F.; Han, X. P.; Hu, Y. X.; Cheng, F. Y.; Chen, J. -MnO2 nanostructures directly grown on Ni foam: a cathode 12 13 Address correspondence to Fangyi Cheng, [email protected]; Jun Chen, [email protected] www.theNanoResearch.com∣www.Springer.com/journal/12274 | Nano Research Nano Res. catalyst for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 3522-3525. Liu, S. Y.; Zhu, Y. G.; Xie, J.; Huo, Y.; Yang, H. Y.; Zhu, T. J.; Cao, G. S.; Zhao, X. B.; Zhang, S. C. Direct growth of 3 flower-like δ-MnO2 on three-dimensional graphene for high-performance rechargeable Li-O2 batteries. Adv. Energy 4 Mater., in press, DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201301960. 5 [9] Wang, H. L.; Yang, Y.; Liang, Y. Y.; Zheng, G. Y.; Li, Y. G.; Cui, Y.; Dai, H. J. Rechargeable Li–O2 batteries with a 6 covalently coupled MnCo2O4–graphene hybrid as an oxygen cathode catalyst. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7 7931-7935. 8 [10] Xu, J. J.; Xu, D.; Wang, Z. L.; Wang, H. G.; Zhang, L. L.; Zhang, X. B. Synthesis of perovskite-based porous 9 La0.75Sr0.25MnO3 nanotubes as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for rechargeable lithium–oxygen batteries. Angew. 10 Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3887-3890. 11 [11] Oh, D.; Qi, J. F.; Lu, Y.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Belcher, A. M. Biologically enhanced cathode design for 12 improved capacity and cycle life for lithium-oxygen batteries. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2756-2763. 1 2 [8] | www.editorialmanager.com/nare/default.asp
© Copyright 2024