Keeping up the momentum: The importance of Dr Tim Whitley

Keeping up the momentum: The importance of
innovation to keep networks fit for the future
Dr Tim Whitley
MD Research & Innovation, BT Distinguished Engineer
Context
Trends
Challenges for BT
• Increasing consumer and business data usage:
• To provide enough capacity to keep up with demand.
• To devices that customers want to use, wherever they are
and when they want to use it.
• At reasonable cost.
• To offer seamless connectivity requires integration of fixed
and mobile networks.
• Manage implications for core network
– Device penetration (tablets, smartphones, smart TVs);
– Video usage across all device types;
– Internet of things, ‘wearables’ etc..
• Increased bundling of services:
– Convergence of content/TV and broadband;
– Convergence of fixed and mobile;
• Voice heading towards being an application on IP.
2
Access – BT’s Broadband Heritage
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
August 2000: BT Launched 500kbps ADSL broadband
September 2004: BT removes distance limitations for ADSL
March 2006: BT Launches 8Mbps DSL Max
April 2008: BT Launches 24M Wholesale Broadband Connect
January 2009: BT Infinity / Fibre Broadband launched
April 2012: 80Mbps FTTC launched
November 2012: 10G PON trial in Cornwall
August 2013: 300Mbps Infinity product launched
Spring 2014: Scale Vectoring Trial
Summer 2014: G.Fast technology trial
G.fast
VDSL
ADSL
Broadband
Narrowband
Copper speeds: advances over time
3
The access network
5600 locations
<2.2MHz, Typ 3.5km length
~89k locations
<17MHz, Typ 350m length
Fibre to the Cab
~4M locations
<106MHz, Typ ~35m length
Fibre to the DP
~29M locations
Fibre to the Premise
4
Access – broadband Innovations
Driving faster speeds
Extending reach
•
•
•
•
• We are innovating to extend benefits of faster access to the
final c. 10% of coverage
• Copper rearrangement
• Broadband regenerators for ADSL
• Microwave wireless to the cabinet
• VDSL amplifiers
• Fibre to the remote node (mini DSLAMs)
FTTC – Vectoring
FTTRN – VDSL closer to the customer
FTTDP – G.Fast
FTTP
Vectoring
Cabinet
5
The impact of crosstalk and vectoring
Crosstalk generation within a cable
Signal 1
Signal 2
line 1
Signal 3
line 3
line 2
Cable binder
Vectoring gain (laboratory measurement)
Maximum Downstream
(kbit/s)
bit-rate
Max Attn Bit Rate (kbps)
• Crosstalk is due to coupling between pairs in a multi-pair copper cable
and limits FTTC speeds.
• Increasing cable fill through customer take-up increases crosstalk and
reduces line-rates.
• By calculating a “pre-compensation” factor for each line, the crosstalk
can be cancelled in the DSLAM.
• The technique for doing this is called “Vectoring”, and is conceptually
similar to noise cancelling headphones.
• Openreach has trialled six vectored cabinets with c.1000 live
customers in Braintree and Barnet. Phase 2 trials are now underway.
120000
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
200
300
400
600
900
1200
Cable Length (m)
Performance without Vectoring
Performance with Vectoring
6
Pushing fibre deeper into the network: the Distribution Point
• Beyond the green cabinets, BT has overhead and underground
DPs with:
•
•
An average of ~8 customers connected;
Can have >16 customers in some cases.
Typical pole DP
serving 12 customers
• Space is limited and they are exposed to the elements.
• The typical distance from the DP to the customer is ~35m
making it the ideal location for delivering very high speeds.
• A new technology (G.fast) is being standardised in the ITU:
•
•
Enables speeds of up to 1 Gbit/s;
Commercial G.Fast equipment is expected in H2 15/16.
Typical distribution
footway joint box
7
We have trialled G.Fast in the network
• Trial had three customers connected to one DP
• The network was overlaid to prevent harm to existing
services, but used existing duct infrastructure
• Chart shows best and worst case performance
• Physics of G.Fast worked as expected
• Vectoring proved to be critical in delivering the top speeds
19m
19m
66m
10G backhaul
66m
19m
66m
47m
8
BT is opening a new, purpose-built, ultrafast broadband lab at our Adastral Park R&D
centre in Ipswich
• G.Fast has demonstrated potential that now needs to be
tested and verified.
• We will study the full technical capabilities of G.Fast hardware
designed by leading system vendors.
• We will continue to play a proactive role in developing G.Fast
standards in the ITU.
• It’s crucial that we stay ahead of the curve for the benefit of
our customers and shareholders.
Emulation network enables
replication of different realworld final-drop topologies
DP and CPE installations allow a
full range of performance and
operations tests
9
FTTP – 10G and beyond
• GPON provides 2.5Gbit/s downstream, 1.2Gbit/s upstream
• XG-PON1 provides 10Gbit/s downstream, 2.5Gbit/s upstream
• Exploiting existing Fibre Network with separated wavelengths
•
XG-PON and GPON coexist on the same fibre
• No change to Optical Distribution Network (ODN)
•
WDM1r (Filter) component already in place
• We are working on NG-PON2 which provides 40Gbit/s
downstream and 10Gbit/s upstream on a single PON
GPON
system
2.5Gbit/s & 10Gbit/s
(1490nm & 1577nm)
GPON OLT
XG-PON1 OLT
GPON ONT
XG-PON1 ONT
WDM1r
XG-PON1
system
Power splitter
1.24Gbit/s & 2.5Gbit/s
(1310nm & 1270nm)
GPON ONT
10
Access fibre deployment and new services will drive future core bandwidth demand
• Current core traffic growth CAGR = 45%.
• Bandwidth demand analysis to 2033 suggests core
requirement of c.12Tbit/s by 2020.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Over the Top content;
Video on Demand;
4k/8k content delivery;
Cloud-based applications;
HD Video-calling;
Rich media webpages;
Software package size growth;
Customer expectations of speed.
Future demand mitigation:
–
–
Improved video coding;
Time-shift delivery
techniques.
70
60
Modelling suggests
c 25 to 30 fold core
capacity increase
over the next ten
years
Core traffic (Tbit/s)
Key future demand drivers:
Time of day activity scenarios
have been used to model
bandwidth demand of different
user types
Low Scenario
Mid Scenario
50
High Scenario
40
30
20
10
2013
2018
2023
2028
2033
Potential long-term core capacity requirements
11
BT’s upgrades core transmission roughly every ten years...
1Tbit/s
Bandwidth
100Gbit/s
10Gbit/s
2.5Gbit/s
155Mbit/s
40Gbit/s
1G, 10G, 40G, 100G
SDH MESH
622Mbit/s
PDH
SDH rings
Megastream
2-155 Mbit/s
PSTN
Private Circuits
Kilostream
PSTN
155M -2.4G
Broadband,
ATM & IP
We are now deploying 100Gbit/s coherent optics
64Kbit/s
1980
1G-10G
1G-10G
34Mbit/s
2Mbit/s
21C WDM
UBB
NG-WDM
1990
2000
Year
2010
2020
12
The Next Generation: 400G & Terabit Trials
2T & Beyond
2T
S/W Configurable modulation formats
1.4T Alien Flexgrid Super channel
1T
800G
Super channel
400G & 200G (16-QAM)
Cambridge
TNOC
Alien Wavelengths
100G
Coherent
40/100G
Norw ich
83km
77km
New market
Cambridge
Ipswich
24km
13.5km
68km
Adastral
park
50.7km
29km
Bishops Stortford
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Colchester
58km
52km
64km
Wood green
14km
62km
Basildon
BT Adastral
Park
BT Tow er
BT Tower
13
The Next Generation: Gridless & Optical Superchannels
• Current WDM has rigid 50GHz grid structure.
• Future gridless infrastructure permits improved fibre
utilisation (spectral efficiency).
Example: 1.4T “Superchannel” comprising 7 x 200G (16-QAM) subchannels
14
Pushing the boundaries
• We have demonstrated real-time 2.2T Transport over managed
Flexgrid infrastructure:
400GHz
2.2T Superchannel
– 11 x 200G 16-QAM Superchannel;
2.2T
(11 x 200G 16-QAM)
– 33.5GHz subcarrier spacing giving a spectral efficiency of
5.97bits/s/Hz, more than 49% improvement over conventional
50GHz grid.
• We are working with partners to develop our understanding of
capacity management, for example:
– Demonstrating configurable Superchannel alongside multiple
100G 50GHz grid channels;
– Working with Huawei U2000 management system.
100G
100G
Superchannel
Configurable Superchannel
operating alongside 100G grid
channels
15
The next challenges are control, flexibility and vendor interoperability...
SDN datacentre & network orchestration
Datacentre with general
purpose H/W suitable for NfV
SDN orchestrating the provision of
virtualised network functions
Software Defined Networking (SDN)
Network functions Virtualisation (NfV)
• Open standard control and orchestration equipment
• Reduced costs through consolidating functions
• Setting up optical and Ethernet circuits on the fly
• Reduced operational costs
• Control of flexgrid bandwidth and optical modulation formats
• Rapid provision of new services globally
• Multilayer operation allowing time of day router bypass
• Software oriented innovation (including Open Source)
16