Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority – A Case Study

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Regional Connector TIFIA Loan – A Case Study
Presented by Victor Hsu
Partner
Norton Rose Fulbright
National Association of Counties
2014 Annual Conference & Exposition
July 12, 2014
A. Overview of LA Metro
B. Overview of TIFIA Loan Program
C. LA Metro’s Regional Connector TIFIA Loan – A Case Study
D. Conclusion
2
46591182
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
• LA Metro’s bus and rail operation is the third largest public
transportation system in the United States.
• Serves as transportation planner and coordinator, designer,
builder and operator for one of the nation’s largest, most populous
counties.
• 9.8 million people – nearly one-third of California’s residents – live
and work within LA Metro’s 4,083-square mile service area.
3
46591182
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
• Bus fleet includes over 2,400 CNG buses
• Commuter rail system includes almost 90 miles of track,
consisting of 8 lines and 80 stations
• Nearly 9,200 employees
• FY 2015 Adopted Budget of $5.0 billion. In addition to State and
Federal grants and fare box revenues, principal revenue sources
include three 1/2-cent-sales tax levied in Los Angeles County:
Prop A, Prop. C and Measure R.
4
46591182
Measure R Sales Tax
• 1/2-cent sales tax for transit purposes collected in LA County, from April
2009 through March 2039
• Estimated to generate approximately $40 billion throughout its 30-year life
• Currently budgeted to generate $708,400,000 in FY 2014
• Secures over $2 billion in obligations, including:
$686,050,000 of Measure R Senior Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series
2010-A (Taxable Build America Bonds) and Series 2010-B (Tax-Exempt).
Rated AAA by S&P and Aa2 by Moody's.
Funding Agreement with conduit borrower Crenshaw Project Corporation
(CPC) supporting debt service on CPC's $545,900,000 TIFIA Loan. Rated
A- by S&P.
$160,000,000 TIFIA Loan and related Measure R Junior Subordinate Sales
Tax Revenue Bond 2014-A TIFIA Series (Regional Connector TIFIA Loan).
Rated A- by S&P and A by Fitch.
$856,000,000 TIFIA Loan and related Measure R Junior Subordinate Sales
Tax Revenue Bond 2014-B TIFIA Series (Westside Purple Line Extension
Section 1 TIFIA Loan). Rated A- by S&P and A by Fitch.
5
46591182
Los Angeles County Represents a Large and Diverse
Region
6
46591182
7
46591182
LA Metro 30/10 Initiative
8
46591182
LA Metro 30/10 Initiative
9
46591182
LA Metro 30/10 Initiative
10 46591182
LA Metro 30/10 Initiative
11 46591182
30/10 Initiative Map
12 46591182
TIFIA Loans
• Created by Transportation Infrastructure and Innovation Act of
1998 originally to assist with financing large-scale transportation
projects involving tolls and other forms of user-backed revenues
• TIFIA program offers three types of financial assistance:
– Direct Loans
– Loan Guarantees
– Standby Lines of Credit
13 46591182
TIFIA Loans
• TIFIA Loans offer combined construction phase and permanent
financing of capital costs
• Long tenor
• Flexible repayment terms
• Fixed rate set at one basis point above the corresponding SLGS
rate for similar maturity
• Can fund up to 49% of total project cost (or 33% of total project
cost for certain projects not subject to springing lien)
• TIFIA Loans are negotiated with and funded by the U.S.
Department of Transportation.
14 46591182
TIFIA Loans
Program Eligibility
Any project eligible for federal assistance through existing surface
transportation program is also eligible for the TIFIA program.
Examples of eligible projects include:
• Transit
• Rail
• Highways
• International Bridges and Tunnels
• Freight Rail Facilities
• Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
• Intermodal Projects (including port access projects)
15 46591182
TIFIA Loans
SPRINGING LIEN
16 46591182
TIFIA Loans
Springing Lien
• Upon the occurrence of a Bankruptcy Related Event, the TIFIA
Loan shall be secured by a first priority security interest in the
Collateral on a parity with the Senior Obligations.
• Faux Subordination  TIFIA Loan is subordinate except when it
really matters.
17 46591182
TIFIA Loans (continued)
• Project Financings vs. System Financings
• How do we solve the springing lien problem? Three possibilities:
– Have the Secretary of Transportation waive the springing lien requirement
(nonstarter).
– Create a conduit borrowing structure so that the springing lien affects the
collateral of the conduit but not the true borrower (worked in 2012, now a
nonstarter).
– Change the law!
18 46591182
TIFIA Loans
MAP-21
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act
MAP-21 affected the TIFIA program in several significant ways:
• The share of direct loan funding for a project was increased from
33% to 49% (though it remains 33% for projects that do not
include a springing lien)
• The springing lien requirement is eliminated for projects that are
not funded by project revenues (like tolls) but instead are funded
by revenues unrelated to project performance (like sales tax
revenues).
19 46591182
TIFIA Loans (continued)
• Congress authorized $750 million in budget authority for FY 2013
and $1 billion for FY 2014. This budget authority is sufficient to
fund up to $17 billion in principal amount of TIFIA Loans.
• Rural projects were given specific eligibility criteria, and the
minimum project cost for rural projects was lowered from $50
million to $25 million.
20 46591182
TIFIA Participation
Increased
under MAP-21
TIFIA
Participation
Increased
under MAP-21
Under SAFTEA-LU
Under MAP-21
TIFIA,
33%
TIFIA,
49%
NonTIFIA,
67%
21 46591182
Springing Lien
Waiver Limit (33%)
NonTIFIA,
51%
TIFIA Funding Increased under MAP-21
$12,000
$10,000
$ in millions
$10,000
$7,500
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0
$1,200
$122
$1,200
$122
FY10
FY11
SAFETEA-LU
Credit Subsidy/Loss Reserve
22 46591182
$1,000
$750
FY12
FY13
MAP-21
Loan Capacity
Selection & Funding of a TIFIA Project
23 46591182
TIFIA Documentation Requirements
Source: FHWA
24 46591182
LA Metro
Regional Connector TIFIA Loan
A CASE STUDY
25 46591182
Proposed Terms for LA Metro Regional Connector
TIFIA Loan Agreement
• Borrower: LA Metro
• Principal Amount: $160 million
• Security: Pledge of TIFIA Pledged Revenues
– Measure R Sales Tax Receipts less Senior and Subordinate Obligations Debt
Service, and less Fees and Expenses
– Parity with obligation to make Crenshaw Funding Payments and subordinate all
obligations under existing Measure R Trust Agreement (ultimately rejected)
• 5% Debt Service Reserve Fund
• 1.25 times Additional Bonds Test
• 1.25 times Annual Coverage Ratio Covenant
26 46591182
Security and Measure R Revenue Pledge for
LA Metro Regional Connection TIFIA Loan
• Measure R debt is secured by pledge of all Measure R taxes (less
15% Local Return and State administrative fee)
• Same pledge structure for Prop A and Prop C debt (i.e., all
categories except Local Return and admin fee)
• Received opinion from outside counsel confirming the legality of
85% pledge
• Board approved the 85% pledge prior to first Measure R bond
issue; specified in Measure R Trust Agreement
27 46591182
Flow of Funds for LA Metro Regional Connector
TIFIA Loan Repayment
28 46591182
Measure R Senior Lien Structure
29 46591182
Additional Indebtedness
• Covenant that no additional Measure R debt will be issued unless
Projected TIFIA Pledged Revenues are at least 1.25 times annual
TIFIA Debt Service
• Covenant that projected revenue of each Measure R expenditure
category (e.g. transit, highway) is 1.10 times debt service
attributable to each expenditure category
30 46591182
Measure R Expenditure Categories
31 46591182
LA Metro Regional Connector TIFIA Loan
KEY DIFFERENCES WITH CRENSHAW TIFIA LOAN
• Direct loan instead of conduit borrowing structure
• TIFIA insisted on being secured under the Senior Measure R
Trust Agreement on a third lien basis under the Measure R Sales
Tax Revenue flow of funds, directly behind Senior Bonds and
Subordinate Obligations and senior to the Crenshaw TIFIA Loan
• Required significant surgery to the Senior Measure R Trust
Agreement to accommodate TIFIA’s demands
• Repayment obligation evidenced by Measure R Junior
Subordinate Sales Tax Revenue Bond in addition to TIFIA Loan
Agreement
32 46591182
Measure R Outstanding Debt
 As of July 1, 2014, $686,050,000 of Senior Debt was
outstanding.


No Subordinate Obligations are currently outstanding
First draw for Crenshaw TIFIA loan in June 2015
 Coverage of Senior MADS ($42.6 million in FY16, including 35%
BAB subsidy) by audited FY13 revenues ($576.4 million) is
13.5x.
33 46591182
Amortization of TIFIA Loans
• Amortization of principal to meet overall Measure R funding needs
and resources consistent with the Long Range Transportation
Plan
• Principal amortized annually:
– Regional Connector – FY20 through FY37
– Crenshaw – FY22 through FY37
– Purple Line Extension – FY20 through FY37
• Back-loaded amortization is critical:
– maximizes the benefit of low TIFIA Loan rate
– increases the chances that LA Metro’s 30/10 Initiative will be realized
34 46591182
CONCLUSIONS
 What TIFIA Giveth, TIFIA Taketh Away
 Security Matters
 Size Matters
35 46591182
Disclaimer
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP,
each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the
activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose
Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is
described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or
consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose
Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your
usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
37 46591182