Penn Medicine The Impact of an Early Warning System for Sepsis CHOP Healthcare Informatics April 25 , 2014 Joel Betesh, MD Gordon Tait, BS Asaf Hanish, MPH Benjamin French, PhD Neil Fishman MD Barry Fuchs, MD Christine Vanzandbergen, PA, MPH Craig A Umscheid, MD, MS http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 1 The University of Pennsylvania Health System Three acute care hospitals: • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center • Pennsylvania Hospital • 1,540 acute care beds • 80,020 acute care admissions in 2012 • 73 ACGME accredited training programs http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 2 http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 3 Sepsis Mortality Index (SMI) Definition of Sepsis Mortality Index includes patients with: • Discharge status of ‘Expired’ • Principal and/or secondary diagnosis/diagnoses related to sepsis Observed SMI Expected Expected rate based upon MS-DRG-based algorithm http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 4 Penn Medicine SMI for FY 2011 Goal: Lower the high Sepsis Mortality Index (SMI) at the University of Pennsylvania as determined by University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) UHC SMI data for FY11 • SMI: 1.50 (UPHS), 1.54 (HUP) • UHC Median: 1.19 – Top 5 Performers: 0.53, 0.65, 0.77, 0.78, 0.78 • UHC Rank for Penn: 67/113 • Target (Best Quartile): 0.98 http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 5 The Opportunity • Since the fall of 2011, we have vital sign, covering provider and covering nurse data in our inpatient EHR, Sunrise Clinical Manager. • Other hospitals have begun to use automated alerts for Sepsis based on data in their EHRs. http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 6 The SIRS Criteria 2 or more of the following criteria: • Temperature > 100.4°F or < 96.8 • HR > 90 • RR > 20 or PaCO2 < 32 • WBC > 12000 < 4000, or > 10% immature (band) forms http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 7 Penn Medicine Criteria for Presumed Sepsis Variable Point Temperature <36°C or >38°C 1 Heart Rate >90 beats per minute 1 RR >20 breaths/min; or PACO2 <32 mmHg 1 WBC count <4000 or >12,000 or >10% bands 1 Lactate >2.2 1 Systolic blood pressure <100 1 RR: respiratory Rate; WBC: white blood cell Criterion for presumed sepsis: >4 points http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 8 Results of Retrospective Analysis (4 week period Oct 2011) 4,700 patients. Criterion for presumed sepsis: >4 points. 193 patients scored 4 or more. A score of 4 or more had a positive predictive value of about 23% for death, transfer to ICU or RRT. On average these events occurred over 48 hours after the score of 4 was first met. We felt there were an additional 20% of patients who had sepsis and would be identified by this trigger and could benefit from early diagnosis and treatment. This early warning system was likely to also identify patients who had new episodes of bleeding, cardiac ischemia and pulmonary emboli. http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 9 EWS Data Gathering and Goals • Decrease total and sepsis related inpatient mortality • Decrease time to antibiotics • Decrease ICU transfers (ICU transfers could also increase) • Decrease RRTs (RRTs could also increase) http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 10 Decisions Made Score of 4+ had an acceptable Positive Predictive Value • 23% for hard outcomes of death, ICU transfer or RRT • Anticipated additional 20-30% for sepsis Exclude ICUs, Maternity, PACU, ER, Hospice, and patients <18 years Fire ONCE per visit to start Alert to bring to bedside within 30 minutes patient’s intern and nurse manager (notified by pager) and patient’s nurse (notified by pop up alert in EHR) Limit to patients admitted at go-live or after (9/5/2012) – To gradually ramp up and not overwhelm staff http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 11 EWS System Architecture http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 12 Alarm Process (I) 1) The Alarm Process will: Auto-enter the “Early Warning System Assessment” order • Will generate a primary task for the Covering Nurse (see below): Task Form-based Will retrieve offending criteria Will fetch and display: Last 24 hours of Vital Signs Last 48 hours of relevant Labs http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 13 Alarm Process (II) 2) Primary task completion will create a follow-up task (aka Survey) – See below: http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 14 Primary Process Evaluation NOTIFICATION •Coordinator page sent - 99% •Small, well defined group with limited devices •Nursing pop-up notification viewed - 72% •Relies on accurate nursing assignment in SCM •Covering provider notification sent - 83% •Relies on accurate assignment in SCM •Large number of devices and carriers SCM Task completion •Primary RN task - 95% •Follow up coordinator task - 95% Team gathered at bedside within 30 minutes - 90% http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 15 Preliminary results of EWS alert Silent/control period: • Admitted between Jun 06, 2012 and Sep 04, 2012 • Discharged by Oct 04, 2012 • 15,570 admissions • 595 patients triggered the alert http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 16 Preliminary results of EWS alert Loud/intervention period: • Admitted between Sep 12, 2012 and Dec 11, 2012 • Discharged by Jan 10, 2013 • 16,103 admissions • 731 patients triggered the alert. Chi square compared proportions and Wilcoxon Rank Sum to compare medians before and after the alert went live Results adjusted for age, gender, admitting service and Charlson index http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 17 EWS Process and Outcome Measures http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 18 % RRT < 6hrs 20% 18% 16% 14% % Inpatients 12% 10% OUTCOME MEASURES 8% 6% 4.0% 4% 2% 2.2% 2.0% 1.6% 1.1% 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% Post-period at HUP restricted to Nov/Dec. 0% HUP PAH PMC UPHS Facility Pre/Silent Post/Loud Trend downward but did not achieve significance. http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 19 Subset Analysis We looked at subsets of patients who might show more of a benefit for the alert such as: Elective admissions Emergency admissions Medicine admissions Surgery admissions Patients with a discharge diagnosis of sepsis http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 20 Subgroup Analysis Patients with a Discharge Diagnosis of Sepsis Mortality Entity Studyperiod Septic patients HUP Pre/Silent 179 27 23.7 1.14 HUP Post/Loud 214 35 28.0 1.25 PAH Pre/Silent 21 4 2.2 1.82 PAH Post/Loud 30 2 3.1 0.65 PMC Pre/Silent 28 8 2.4 3.36 PMC Post/Loud 41 3 4.2 0.71 UPHS Pre/Silent 228 39 28.3 1.38 UPHS Post/Loud 285 40 35.4 1.13 Observed Expected O-E http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 21 Since go live in 2012 Done: Alert added in the ER Added alert in Acute Rehab and LTach Units Added second alert after 10 day buffer at Rehab and LTACH Being Discussed: Allowing a second trigger during a single hospital stay Heavy analysis of data with a view to decrease false positives and increasing sensitivity of alert Using change in systolic BP rather than absolute value Machine learning approach to identify new/better parameters for the alert http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 22 Penn Medicine Sepsis Mortality Index for FY 2013 http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 23 Acknowledgments Katherine Clark Jessica Guidi Mark Upton Hilary Faust Denise Feeley Meghan Lane-Fall Mark Mikkelsen William Schweickert Patrick Donnelly Jean Romano Kirsten Smith Barry Fuchs And many others http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 24 Questions? Suggestions? Contact: [email protected] Joanne. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/cep 25
© Copyright 2024