Acquisition Strategy Briefing Template • • • • • • This template is TMA’s preferred model for briefing the Decision Authority (DA) for acquisitions of services. It is designed to guide the user through the myriad of topics and issues to be addressed in an acquisition strategy. Each strategy should address those topics that apply. The basic goal of this briefing is to demonstrate to the DA a well thought-out acquisition strategy that considered all the important issues. This template addresses all of the potential areas DoD and TMA require to be addressed when discussing a particular program strategy. – See DODI 5000.02 Enclosure 9 and TMA TAD 37-01 for specific guidance for acquisitions of services. Additional guidance is provided in the ‘Speaker's Notes’ associated with each slide in this briefing. Sample charts are provided for some areas. If the sample charts are not appropriate for your presentation, alternate charts may be used consistent with the type of information and the specifics of your acquisition. December 2012 1 Acquisition Strategy Briefing [Program Name] Name Office Date of Briefing Version # • The information contained in this briefing is Source Selection Information. It may not be disclosed to anyone not a member of the established source selection organization without the approval of the Source Selection Authority or the Contracting Officer 3 Overview 4 Overview • • • • • • • • • Overview Requirements Development & Market Intelligence Acquisition Planning Risk Mitigation Contract Parameters Contract Oversight & Performance Evaluation What Worries Me Recommendation Backup 5 Overview Don’t wait to the end to bring up the negatives! • Bottom Line Up Front – Decisions you are requesting • Approve Acquisition Strategy • Approve applicable delegations – Major issues • • • • • Stakeholder Issues Significant Risks Contractor to Government In-sourcing Organizational/Personal Conflicts of Interest Other Concerns – Proposed Deviations and/or Waivers (if applicable) 6 Overview Multifunctional Team Title Name Requiring Activity Manager Deputy Requiring Activity Manager Project Lead Contracting Officer Quality Assurance Manager Legal Advisor End-user Representative 7 (Delete if end user is already represented) Overview Requirements/Direction Requirement is for: (briefly describe) Using Organization(s): SRVD Approval Date: Decision Authority Decision Authority: Coordinating Organizations: - COD-A, COD-FC, CIO, etc Financial Data Acquisition Strategy Discussion Est. Total Contract Value: PSC: Fund Type: Competitive: Fund Source: Contract Type: Contract PoP: Proposed Deviations & Waivers: Estimated Contract Award Date: Start Date: 8 Overview • Program goals and objectives – Aligned to mission & focused on the desired results • Service Level? Cost? Availability? – Should be specific and quantifiable • Examples – – – – Complete and uninterrupted support 24/7 Conduct a study Perform contract support Perform program management support 9 Requirements Development & Market Intelligence 10 Requirements Development & Market Intelligence – Requirements Development • How was requirement previously satisfied • Historical Overview (existing contract) Current contract scope & PoP Expiration date? Extensions? $XXXM Value - $XX million/year • Requirements changes from previous contract – Impact of in-sourcing – Expanded, Reduced, Eliminated? – Discuss any changes as well as any lessons learned/things you’re fixing, etc, that are being included in new requirement • If planning sole source, detail authority and plans for future opportunities for competition 11 Requirements Development & Market Intelligence • Market Intelligence – Provide analysis of the market for this service • Market Research Activities – Detail market research activities See notes for additional thoughts on what Market Intelligence and Market Research may include Use as many charts as necessary 12 Requirements Development & Market Intelligence – Small Business • Small Business capability survey • Is this acquisition appropriate for Small Business set-aside? – If so, what are your recommendations? – Bundling or consolidation decision – Is this acquisition appropriate for full and open competition? • Subcontracting plan (if applicable) • Describe your approach for incorporating SB subcontracting goals into your overall acquisition strategy • Identify the SB subcontracting goals • Describe how SB subcontracting plans will be evaluated • Identify planned contract incentives to encourage aggressive SB subcontracting Requirements Development & Market Intelligence Conclusions of Requirements Development & Market Intelligence (e.g., How did your market intelligence activities shape your requirement/strategy?) 14 Acquisition Planning 15 Acquisition Planning • Proposed acquisition strategy – – – – Competitive or sole source? Period of performance Contract Type (single or multiple award, IDIQ, etc) CLIN Types (e.g., mix of FP and CR) • Rationale for proposed strategy 16 Acquisition Planning • Contract Incentives As Applicable – Proposed incentives and standards for metrics • Targets for incentives and measures for success • Value added and expectations • Required Waivers or Deviations – Note waivers or deviations that require prior approval – Approval level – N/A if not applicable 17 Acquisition Planning Milestones KICKOFF MEETING/IPT REQUIREMENTS APPROVAL MARKET INTELLIGENCE / RFI SYNOPSIS PEER REVIEW ACQUISITION STRATEGY/SOURCE SELECTION PLAN BRIEFING J&A/ACQUISITION PLAN (or Acq Strategy) APPROVAL DPAP NOTIFICATION/COORDINATION (as applicable) DRAFT RFP RELEASE FEDBIZOPS SYNOPSIS OF FORMAL RFP PRESOLICITATION CONFERENCE (if Comp) PEER REVIEW Example -- Change as Applicable RFP RELEASE Date PAST PERFORMANCE RECEIVED Date PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE (if Comp) PROPOSALS RECEIVED INITIAL EVALUATION BRIEFING 18 Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Include necessary team training (DAU, etc.) Date RELEASE EVALUATION NOTICES Date FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS BRIEF Date REQUEST FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS / CLOSE DISCUSSIONS Date FPR RECEIPT Date FINAL DECISION BRIEF Date SSA DECISION Date PEER REVIEW Date CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION (as applicable) Date CONTRACT AWARD Date DEBRIEFINGS (if Comp/if requested) Date Acquisition Planning $ in Millions PhaseIn FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Program Total Independent Government Estimate 9.2 24.5 52.1 55.0 62.3 65.8 268.9 35.5 38.0 40.6 259.0 19.5 24.3 25.2 9.9 Projected Budget 6.3 15.6 33.3 Delta 2.9 8.9 18.8 • Discuss cost-sharing arrangements if applicable. Conclusions on cost/budget analysis/issues Example -- Change as Applicable 19 Acquisition Planning • • Source Selection Procedures – Performance price trade-off (PPT) – Performance is approximately equal to price Evaluation Criteria: All subfactors are equal in importance and are not in descending order – Technical Capability (Pass/Fail) • Subfactor 1: (ex. Logistics Support) • Subfactor 2: (ex. Program Management) • Subfactor 3: (ex. Transition Phase In/Out) – Past Performance • Recent and Relevant Performance within X years prior to release of RFP – Maximum of X contracts for prime contractor and maximum of Y contracts for proposed major subcontractors – Cost/Price • Realistic, reasonable & balanced • Methodology: (ex. sample tasks) Example--Change as Applicable to Acquisition 20 Acquisition Planning Example SSAC Chair Price/Contract Documents Lead Pricing Rep Contracting Rep SSA SSET Chair – Co-Chair – Technical Capability Lead Technical Rep Technical Rep Advisors Past Performance Lead Technical Rep Technical Rep 21 Risk Management 22 Risk Management Risk Mitigation: Discuss various mitigation strategies to address risks Risk Areas—Performance, Cost, Schedule Low Mod High Mitigation Plan Risk Areas Mitigation Plan Risk Areas Mitigation Plan Risk workshop or similar training completed -- Date 23 Risk Management Potential Evaluation Area Risk Assessment RFP Sec M Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Area Risk Assessment Low Evaluation Area Risk Assessment High Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Area Risk Assessment High Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Area Risk Assessment Low Evaluation Area Risk Assessment Moderate Evaluation Area Risk Assessment Low Evaluation Area Risk Assessment Low Evaluation Area Risk Assessment Moderate Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Criteria 24 Risk Management • Possible issues As Applicable – Technical • Data rights, compliance based restraints (environmental, safety, etc) – Contractor to Government In-sourcing – Potential OCI issues to include inherently governmental functions/closely related to inherently governmental functions – Other significant issues • e.g. pending legislation (both program related and service specific impacts), DOL wage determinations, union agreements, etc Use as many charts as necessary 25 Risk Management • Contractor Support As Applicable – List contractors on staff supporting requirements development and/or source selection – List by name, company, roles and responsibilities – Identify and evaluate potential organizational conflicts of interest – Discuss your plans to avoid, neutralize, or mitigate Use as many charts as necessary 26 Risk Management Conclusions of Risk Assessment (e.g., How did your risk analysis shape your acquisition planning?) 27 CONTRACT PARAMETERS 28 Contract Parameters • Award: – e.g., single contract, multiple award contract • Duration: – Base period and all option periods to include phase-in • Pricing arrangement: – e.g., fixed price, cost reimbursement, time and materials, labor hour, or variations, based on guidance in FAR Parts 12 and 16 • Special clauses (H clauses) – e.g., Organizational Conflict of Interest mitigation plan 29 Contract Parameters • Contract/Task Order CLIN Structure – 0001 - Firm Fixed Price (FFP): For static low risk services or straight advisory service with deliverable outcome – 0002 - Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF): Requirements that incentivizes the contractor with objective metric data and measurable performance – 0003 - Labor Hour (L/H): For higher risk, level of effort, assistance on projects or to fill gaps (surge requirements) – 0004 - Travel (Cost reimbursable): Allowable travel costs (i.e. training, conferences, site visits, exercises) – 0005 - Incidental Material (Cost reimbursable): Material for requirements that may have a deliverable (i.e. software and/or hardware or incidental to the overall project) – 0006 - Contract Data Requirement List (CDRL) Example -- Change as Applicable 30 CONTRACT OVERSIGHT AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 31 Contract Oversight & Performance Evaluation – Describe your approach for managing performance on this program – Who is responsible/accountable for gathering/managing performance information? – Level of experience of appointed personnel; full/part-time duties; training – What processes/methods will be used to identify and remediate performance issues? – What efforts will be taken to identify ways to seek performance improvements? How will performance issues be communicated and resolved? Examples 32 Contract Oversight & Performance Evaluation Service Delivery Summary Items TASK STANDARD Productivity Efficiency IAW PWS Para 6.2 Productivity efficiency rating of 80% (standard hours divided by clocked hours). To receive a Satisfactory , the Contractor must have an efficiency rating of 75% to 80%. To receive an Excellent, the Contractor must have an efficiency rating of 80% or more. An “Unacceptable” will be assessed if the Contractor has an efficiency rate of less than 75%. Phase/Preservation/Depreservation IAW PWS Para 4.6 To be based on meeting contract requirements for quality and # of problems noted during inspections by QA personnel following completion of phase, preservation, depreservation or special inspections for each reporting period. Performance will be scored as follows: To receive a score of Satisfactory, there may be no more than 5 minor discrepancies. To receive an “Excellent”, the Contractor must have no more than 2 minor discrepancies. An unacceptable will be assessed if the Contractor’s performance did not meet most contractual requirements and/or had more than 5 minor discrepancies during the reporting period. Example -- Change as Applicable 33 Contract Oversight & Performance Evaluation • • • • • • Inspection Methods and Frequency Incentives for Successful Performance Example-- Change as Applicable – Options Exercised – Favorable CPARS Unacceptable Performance - Failure to Meet Performance Standards – Negative CPAR ratings, Re-performance at no additional cost to the Government, Reduction in Contract Price, etc. Quality Assurance Approach • All CORs - Standardized CO or QAPC led training & CO led training • CORs will inspect performance IAW Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan and Quality Control Plan PMRs – Held quarterly; more frequently if needed – Emphasis on overall performance and process improvement Annual Execution Reviews/Post Award Peer Reviews 34 WHAT WORRIES ME 35 What Worries Me • Discuss political issues (if applicable) – Specific member or staffer interest – Congressional language or budgetary earmarks • Discuss any issues that are of a particular concern to the PEO – Ex. OSD oversight issues – Ex. Funding instability • Explain how you intend to track these areas specifically and report to the SSA any problems This is an opportunity to communicate internal concerns to the SSA 36 RECOMMENDATION 37 Recommendation • Approve this Acquisition Strategy – – – – Performance Price Trade-off with Technical Factors Full & Open Competition 5 Year Contract – 1 Year Base and (4) 1 Year Options FPIF • Provide approval to proceed for applicable Determinations and Findings: – Waivers, etc • Issue the Decision Memorandum signifying approval of the above Example -- Change as Applicable 38
© Copyright 2024