Aerospace Use Of Hexavalent Chromium And Soluble Nickel In Relation To REACh 7th October 2009 From a combined Goodrich and Rolls-Royce review of the implications of REACh for the aircraft industry Goodrich: J Henshaw; G Armstrong Rolls-Royce: A Page; J Watson; C Phillips; A Phillips © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Chromium And Nickel Compounds In Current Products The Aerospace industry Currently uses hexavalent chrome and nickel compounds in a number of flight critical applications for various reasons Has been researching viable alternatives for many years Has found that very few alternatives are successful in the aircraft environment Compared to other industries, requires a significantly longer time to introduce changes into existing products due to the extensive testing obligations to comply with airworthiness requirements. 2 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Chromium and Nickel Compounds In Current Products As an example Components supplied for an Airbus A 320 aircraft (typically engines, flight control actuators, landing gear etc) Original equipment deliveries planned until at least 2018 Fleet support required until approximately 2040 Supplied products include extensive use of: – hard chrome plating; Chromic anodising; Sealing of anodising on aluminium alloys; passivation baths for stainless steel and cadmium plating; sacrificial paints using chrome phosphate; conversion coatings on magnesium and aluminium; nickel plating; tribomet coatings for wear and sealing; electrochemical machining. Problem The above products have been fully tested and certified for flight Changes require extensive retesting to prove that they represent a comparable safe alternative Introduction onto the aircraft / engine typically takes between 5 and 10 years – 3 Assuming that the alternative has already proved to be technically capable © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Aerospace Equipment Sector Cr6+ Use and Status Substance Process used in Hard chrome plating Chromic Acid Chromic acid anodising Sealing of anodising on aluminium alloys Sodium Dichromate Passivation baths for stainless steel Passivation of cadmium plating Why important in Design Provides sealing surface for hydraulic seals, wear resistance to moving parts and corrosion protection Provides best corrosion protection of the various anodising methods and has least detrimental effect on fatigue properties of the base material. Provides the best corrosion protection, particularly in applications which will not be painted for environmental and weight benefit. Used to ensure best resistance to corrosion from stainless steels and necessary to comply with aircraft industry standards Used to ensure that cadmium plated parts meet international standard for corrosion protection Status of Alternatives Alternatives, e.g. HVOF, available for about 50% of applications but they have to be designed in from new. Substitution in mid life not an option. Alternatives exist for some applications and can be used on existing designs. No alternatives are proven for fatigue critical parts or parts made from castings. Alternatives are still being evaluated. Best candidate requires nickel salts so no environmental advantage. Alternatives do exist but are not compliant with international aircraft industry standards. Alternatives exist for about 70% of new designs. Not possible to apply without equipment re-design to producst already qualified. Note: The original substances are not present in the final product 4 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Aerospace Equipment Sector Cr6+ Use and Status Substance Process used in Corrosion protection Chrome phosphate Oxidation protection Why important in Design Provides surfaces with corrosion protection to guarantee component life. Status of Alternatives Trivalent chrome alternatives under development, but not equivalent life nor validated in an engine environment. Provides oxidation protection to surfaces used at high temperature. Alternatives exist for some applications based on trivalent chrome. These can be used in existing designs no alternatives are proven for fatigue critical parts. Organic barrier coatings Two-part epoxy paint systems Corrosion protection of complex geometries. Protection against wet corrosion on complex geometries. Used to give required corrosion Various Paints, both primer protection from paint in the aircraft chromate salts and topcoats operating environment. 5 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 Some alternatives available but not validated in an engine environment. Some alternatives available but not validated in an engine environment. Alternatives available for use on some new designs but not all. Change of paint to existing designs not yet accepted without extensive testing. CONFIDENTIAL Aerospace Equipment Sector Nickel Use and Status Substance Process used in Why important in Design Abrasive coating Provides a means to guarantee engine performance and is essential in achieving component lifetime No known alternatives. through improvements in fatigue resistance. Nickel sulphamate / nickel chloride Wear resistant coatings Nickel plating Nickel plating Nickel sulphate / nickel nitrate Status of Alternatives Provides improved wear resistance Alternatives exist for some applications and can be used to surfaces and guarantees on existing designs. No alternatives are proven for component lifetime through fatigue and wear resistance for critical parts. mitigation of fatigue failures. Provides the best corrosion protection, particularly in applications of complex geometry. Provides the best corrosion protection, particularly in applications of complex geometry. Alternatives are still being evaluated. Currently none provide an environmental advantage. Alternatives are still being evaluated. Currently none provide an environmental advantage. Electrochemical Used to provide means of machining Alternatives exist for some geometries but manufacturing machining (ECM) complex shapes. is more complex and would require re-validation. Note: The original substances are not present in the final product 6 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Aerospace Equipment Sector Ni 2+(aq) Use and Status Substance Process used in Nickel Sulphate Nickel Hypophosphite Nickel Phosphite Electroless Nickel plating Nickel Chloride Nickel Sulphamate Nickel Acetate Sealing of anodising on aluminium alloys Why important in Design Status of Alternatives Unique as being the one hard coating process which is electroless Some potential from electroless nickel boron but as yet and so will plate on complex and not proven for endurance, and not available in supply internal geometries as there are no chain. electrode, electric field intensity or line of site issues Provides good corrosion protection Alternatives are still being evaluated in same task as on 7000 series alloys in a sealing that to replace dichromate sealing. So far, alternaitves solution which does not contain have inferior corrosion performance. chrome 6+ ions Note: The original substances are not present in the final product 7 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Example Data – Rolls-Royce Testing Status For Hexavalent Chrome Replacements 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Today's "chrome" applications Validated chrome-free replacement exists Potential chrome-free replacements not yet validated No known chrome-free replacement exists Other aerospace companies have programmes in place with similar results 8 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Typical Uses Of Hexavalent Chrome And Soluble Nickel Aircraft paints Engines Primary and secondary flight control actuation Landing gear 9 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Materials In A Current Civil Engine Rolls-Royce Example All Others 5% Steel 25% Nickel 40% Titanium 30% Current Technology: • All steel and all aluminium parts of an engine (the outer casing) are coated in mixtures containing hex chrome in at least one layer of the coating system: Usually in all 8 – 10 layers. • Even if alternatives are available during manufacture, hex chrome is needed for product repair. 10 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Summary Changes to products are governed by legal airworthiness requirements which also define the requirements for retesting when changes are made Testing must be to the same standard and vigour as occurred for the original aircraft / engine airworthiness approval Safe replacements are at various stages of technical approval Many examples exist where safe alternatives have not yet been developed or proven Substance elimination under REACh must take account of the special needs of the aircraft industry due to the safety implications 11 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Conclusion With very few exceptions, hexavalent chrome and soluble nickel are not in the final product on aircraft. There is no exposure of them to the public. Exposures to downstream workers and during manufacture is restricted via a highly restricted and controlled environment. e.g. Component maintenance manuals and Nadcap Credible alternatives have not yet reached a stage of maturity to give confidence that they could be implemented within current estimates of the REACh time table. With enough research work, hexavalent chrome and soluble nickel compounds could be significantly reduced in future aircraft models provided that the alternatives can be proven to satisfy the demanding technical standards for airworthiness. Existing aircraft will need to be maintained for several decades with a safe and stable supply of spares. Validation of retrospective design changes is significantly more challenging than new product introduction If any of these substances are listed on REACh Annex XIV, then the aircraft industry will require exemption for existing aircraft programmes. 12 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Supporting Information Additional slides with further supporting information to the earlier tables follow this slide for use if required. 13 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Alternatives tested for hard chrome plating WC-Co-Cr applied by HVOF spray coating Limited application opportunities due to adverse impact on base material Successful in some applications Geometry constraints so not a universal substitute Very limited availability in supply base W-Co electroplated nano coating Potential option to produce hard surfaces for seals to run on Still in R&D phase – no commercial availability Not proven for seal running Diamond like carbon Not a viable option following testing due to poor adhesion and poor endurance – required coating thickness cannot be achieved PVD Coatings As for Diamond like carbon – not a viable option following testing due to poor adhesion and poor endurance – required coating thicknesses cannot be achieved. 14 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Alternatives tested for chromic anodising Sulphuric anodising Coating has to be 5 times thicker than chromic for equivalent corrosion resistance Fatigue properties of base alloy are damaged by this process Cannot be used on aluminium parts made from castings Can only be used on non fatigue sensitive parts made from bar or forging Boric Sulphuric Anodising Works well but still needs dichromate sealing for acceptable corrosion resistance Minimal reduction in fatigue properties Boeing IPR so cannot be used on Airbus products Keronite PEO Coating Thicker coating than chromic anodising Claims that it does not reduce fatigue properties - not proven 15 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL Alternatives for Electroless Nickel Plating None yet evaluated The key attribute of the electroless nickel process is that it is electroless and so does not have the geometric constraints of electroplating or spraying processes (edge effects and line of site issues) Possibility for electroless Nickel-Boron plating but not readily available and not yet tested by GAS. 16 © Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited 2009 CONFIDENTIAL
© Copyright 2024