Wrexham Community Cohesion Strategy 2011-14 Equality Information and Outcomes 1 Overview of presentation: • • • • • • Background to cohesion in Wrexham Strategy development – Equality duties Performance monitoring Results Based Accountability – theory Results Based Accountability – reality! Putting it all together – performance framework that includes equality monitoring 2 Strategic Objective/Actions Performance Indicators/Milest ones Target Q1 Q2 Q3 Actu al LSB trainin g undert aken 28 TPRC sInclud es LSB organi sation s 31 Includ es Conta ct Wrexh am Colo ur Green Green Green Actu al LGBT group commi tment Disabili ty Comm unity Faith Comm unity – initial meetin gs held Work ongoin g Colo ur Green Green Green Actu al 27 Less report s 46 Colo ur Green Amber Green Lead Organisation / Partnership Q4 4. Integration 4.2 Continue to develop network of third party reporting centres to report and record and respond where appropriate to hate incidents both within the communities of Wrexham and within the workplace. 4.2.1 TPRCs engaged in an active support network 4.2.2 Diverse communities engaged in the anti hate project 4.2.3 Increase in reported hate crime 25 (including 9 LSB organisatio ns) LGBT From 50 to 70 per year Wrexham Community Safety Partnership Wrexham Community Safety Partnership Wrexham Community Safety Partnership 3 4 5 6 Key consultation feedback • Continue to deliver the priorities taken forward through the current community cohesion strategy; • Increase the level of engagement with children and young people around the cohesion debate, including building good relations through play; • Develop more explicit links with the equalities agenda; • Explore in more detail community cohesion issues in relation to disability and develop options for increased engagement; • Develop a better understanding of the links and shared priorities with community regeneration work; • Continue to mainstream community cohesion wherever possible; and • Improve monitoring and evaluation by adopting a ‘Results Based Accountability’ approach. 7 Results Based Accountability [RBA] • • • • • • • What are the quality of life conditions we want for the children, adults and families who live in our community? RESULTS What would these conditions look like I we could see them INDICATORS How can we measure theses conditions? PERFORMANCE MEASURES How are we doing on the most important of our measures? Who are the partners that have a role to play in doing better? What works to do better, including no-cost and lowcost ideas? What do we propose to do? PROJECTS 8 Results Based Accountability [RBA] – what we are aiming at……. Result Indicator Project Indicator Project Performance Measures Project Performance Measures Project Performance Measures Performance Measures 9 Short term / Year 1 Medium term / year 2 Long term / year 3 • Very important • Lower degree of • Require • Urgent urgency underpinning • Create a work in years 1 baseline +2 • Underpin future • Require further investigation work • Dependant on other issues / activities Long list of ideas, Long list of ideas, Long list of ideas, ambitions, blue ambitions, blue ambitions, blue sky thinking……. sky thinking……. sky thinking……. 10 Quality of Life Condition i.e. the Result people want: ‘Wrexham is a peaceful and harmonious place where people have a sense of belonging and get on well together’ 11 Indicators [how we will recognise the Result]: •Wrexham is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together •Wrexham is a place where community tensions are understood and are peacefully resolved at an early stage 12 Strategic Action Plan [the actions we will take that have a reasoned chance of improving the Result] Wrexham is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together • Minority communities are represented on strategic partnerships • Public, voluntary and community sector staff understand who our communities are and what they need • Different communities come together in everyday situations Wrexham is a place where community tensions are understood and are peacefully resolved at an early stage • People are confident to report community tensions * • Children and young people influence the community cohesion agenda • Children and young people are confident to mix together 13 RBA Performance Measures [how well are we delivering the actions]: •How much did we do? •How well did we do it? •Is anyone better off? 14 Outcome What this will look like How we will achieve this [projects] Performance measure How much we did How well we did it better Is anyone off People are confident to report community tensions Community tensions are reported Continue to develop the Anti Hate project to ensure that children, young people and adults from all communities can access the support service. Continue to raise awareness of the Community Tension Monitoring process No of TPRCs targeting people with protected characteristics No of anti hate awareness raising activities [agencies, TPRCs, communities, young people] No of reports by protected characteristic / age No of tension monitoring awareness raising activities No of Community Tension Monitoring reports received No of tension reports escalated to the Community Tension Monitoring Group % customer satisfaction with anti hate project [TPRCs, agencies, helping agencies, victims /age] % customer satisfaction with awareness raising activities % of tension reports / geographic and agency spread No and % of victims who feel the Anti Hate project had helped them / protected characteristic / age [Key Performance Indicator] No and % of agencies who feel the Anti Hate project has helped them characteristic / age No and % of agencies who feel the Tension Monitoring Project has helped them No and % of cases that would not have been resolved under the previous system 15 Putting it all together: Wrexham is a peaceful and harmonious place where people have a sense of belonging and get on well together Wrexham is a place where people from Different backgrounds get on well together Project Wrexham is a place where community tensions are understood and are peacefully resolved at an early stage Community Tension Monitoring Project Performance Measures Performance Measures Third Party Reporting Centres How much? How well? Anyone better off? How much? How well? Anyone better off? 16 Contact details Gill Grainger – Community Cohesion Manager [email protected] Tel: 01978 298736 Mo Caldecott – Community Cohesion Officer [email protected] Tel: 01978 298735 17
© Copyright 2024