1. No category

Teksam K3 Semester Project Fall 2015
-­‐
Roskilde University, Denmark
The DGNB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable certi7ication in Denmark REPORT APPENDIX Rodney F Cottrell
05 Jan. 2015
Bent Søndergård, Project Advisor
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX APPENDIX -­‐ Introductory note This document is the appendix to the research report “The DGNB as a proto-institution for
sustainable certification in Denmark,” and is meant to be read in reference to and conjunction with
the report.
A2 The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX Appendix Contents TAB. A1.40: DGNB Evaluation Matrix2 (DGNB Mini-Guide, 2014)
p. A4
TAB. A1.41: DGNB Evaluation Matrix (DGNB Mini-Guide, 2014)
p. A5
TAB. A2.13: Certified and Pre-Certified Projects: DNGB for New Urban Districts (oct. 2014) p. A6
TAB. A3.01 Comparison of buildings and uses in three systems (DGNB [SS], 2010)
p. A7
TAB. A3.02 Danish Strengths/Weaknesses regarding certification (Birgisdottir, 2010)
A8
p.
TAB. A3.03 GBC-Dk Membership Jul.2014 - Basic, Support, Personal (DGNB, 2014)
p. A9
TAB. A3.04 GBC-Dk Membership Jul.2014 - Premium (DGNB, 2014)
p. A10
TAB. A3.05 GBC-Dk Board of Directors Oct.2014 (dk-gbc.dk, 2014)
p. A10
TAB. A3.06 Membership in GBC-Dk, July 2014 (GBCD,2014)
p. A11
TAB. A3.07 Member Backgrounds in GBC-Dk, July 2014 (GBCD,2014)
p. A11
TAB. A3.08 Founding Members - DGNB Germany, June 2007 (Die DGNB, 2012 [SS])
p. A12
TAB. A3.09 Initiators - DGNB Germany, June 2007 (Die DGNB, 2012 [SS])
p. A13
FIG. A3.10 Green Turnover by Industry (DEA, 2012)
p. A14
TAB.3.20 Contrasting socio-technical practices in nice and regime (adapted from Smith, 2007)
p. A15
DGNB Project Questionnaire
pp. A16-17
A3 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A1.40: DGNB Evaluation Matrix2 (DGNB Mini-Guide, 2014)
A4 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A1.41: DGNB Evaluation Matrix (DGNB Mini-Guide, 2014)
A5 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A2.13: Certified and Pre-Certified Projects: DNGB for New Urban Districts (oct. 2014)
Certified and Pre-Certified Projects: (oct. 2014)1
project name
Brygger Bakke
Carlsberg City
District
NordhavnTrælasholm +
Sundmolen +
Levantkaj Vest
Nørrestrand, Horsens
project
location
Risskov
Copenhagen
Nordhavn
Horsens, Denmark
project
program
Conversion of
industrial area to
Sustainable district
with shopping, day
care and 1500 - 1800
new homes, youth and
student apartments.
Conversion of former
Carlsberg brewery site
to new city district with
private residences,
retail and business
premises as well as
cultural, sporting and
educational venues
Conversion of harbour
area used as a free
port into new mixeduse, sustainable urban
districts laid out as
small islets with direct
access to the water.
New sustainable
residential district in
Denmark’s fastest
growing municipality,
featuring a mix of
architect-designed lowenergy housing for
1200 residents.
client
Teknik og Miljø, Aarhus Louise Panum
Kommune / DOMIS A/ Baastrup, Carlsberg
S
Byen P/S4
CPH City and Port
Development
Jeppe V. Christensen
landscape
architect
Arkitema
Vogt Landscape
Architects Ltd.
CPH City and Port
Development
Rambøll Danmark A/S
urban planner
Plusform
Entasis (architects)
CPH City and Port
Development
Rambøll Danmark A/S
year of
completion
2018 (expected)
2027 (expected)
2018 (expected)
2020 (expected)
year certified
2013
2013
2013
2013
certification
DGNB Pre-certificate in DGNB Pre-certificate in DGNB Pre-certificate in DGNB Pre-certificate
Silver
Silver
Gold
in Silver
gross floor
area (m2)
125,500
600,000
auditor
S. Stockmarr for
Henning Larsen
Architects
L. Panum Baastrup, for K. Ledgaard for CPH
Carlsbergbyen A/S
City and Port
Development
T. Leerberg for
Rambøll Danmark A/S
project
evaluation (%)
69.2
73.6
81.4
78
Municipal
engagement
Aarhus Kommune
participates as a
project client
Project is developed
under Copenhagen
Local Plan 432 and the
City’s Municipal Plan
Project initiated and
implemented in close
cooperation with the
City of Copenhagen,
including procurement
of an overall structure
plan, and financing.
As of June 2013, the
Municipality had not
yet taken a formal
position on the project,
which requires an
addition to the
municipal plan3
312,500
85,070
1.
2.
3.
4.
Table partially based on information from http://www.dgnb-system.de/en/projects, (2014)
www.dgnb.de/projects/en, (2014)
‘Nu bydel nord for Norrestrand’, 2013.
Carlsberg Byen P/S er et selvstændigt selskab, der ejes af: Carlsberg, Realdania, PFA, Topdanmark og
PenSam. www.carlsbergbyen.dk (2014)
A6 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A3.01 Comparison of buildings and uses in three systems (DGNB [SS], 2010)
A7 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A3.02 Danish Strengths/Weaknesses regarding certification (Birgisdottir, 2010)
Danish strengths
Danish weaknesses
Focus on low primary energy
Environmentally friendly district heating
Good common effluent treatment
High degree of recycling of construction waste
Good dialogue on local planning
Locating close to public transport
Widespread use of bicycles and suitable infrastructure
Focus on thermal, acoustic and visual quality Good
dialogue in the construction process
Limited documentation of construction products
Lack of environmental assessment of material
consumption Limited environmental assessment of
open space
Limited restrictions concerning. Parking spaces
Limited focus on emissions of VOC
Limited evidence (including on the topic climate) No
practice for the use of commissioning
A8 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A3.03 GBC-Dk Membership Jul.2014 - Basic, Support, Personal (DGNB, 2014)
BASIC MEMBERS
CB Richard Ellis
Interface Denmark
P+P Arkitekter
Friis & Moltke
CENERGIA
ISS Facility Services
Polyform arkitekter
Ingeniørhøjskolen Aarhus
Universitet
Region Sjælland
Cirkelbo
Jeudan
Realkredit Danmark
Christensen & Co Arkitekter
JJW Arkitekter
Region Hovedstaden
Tagpapbranchens Oplysningsråd
Coop Invest
Juul & Hansen arkitekter
Region Midtjylland
Via University
CORE arkitekter
KAJ OVE MADSEN
Rubow Arkitekter RUM
Wissenberg
Creo Arkitekter
Kant Arkitekter
Rørbæk & Møller Arkitekter
Dall & Lindhardtsen
SUPPORT MEMBERS
Danica Pension
Kærsgaard & Andersen - arkitekter Rønslev Andersen
og ingeniører
KEA
Rønne & Lundgren
1:1 Arkitekter
Dansk Boligbyg
KEIM Scandinavia
I/S Rosengårdcentret
3XN
Dansk Byggeri
Kingspan Insulation
Sadolin & Albæk
Aarhus Arkitekterne
Dansk Indeklima Mærkning
Kjær & Richter
SAHL Arkitekter
Aart Architects
DATEA
Kolding Kommune
skala arkitekter
Aalborg Portland
De forenede Ejendomsselskaber
Kommandit Aktie Selskabet
Scandi Byg
Aggebo Klima &
Bygningskonstruktion
AI-Gruppen
DEKO
KLP Ejendomme
Schmidt, Hammer & Lassen
DI byggematerialer
KPC Holding
Schüco International
AL2bolig
Dissing + Weitling architecture
KPF Arkitekter
KG Schlüter-Systems
Aluflam
d line as
Krydsrum Arkitekter
SIGNAL Arkitekter
Armstrong Danmark
Dominia
Kuben Management
Sika Danmark
Arkitema Architects
Dorte Mandrup Arkitekter
Københavns Kommune
SITE Arkitekter
Arkitektfirmaet Brøndsted &
Nielsen
Arkitektfirmaet Aaboe
DOMUS arkitekter
LB Consult
Sloth Møller
Drees & Sommer
Lip Bygningsartikler
Sjælsø Danmark
Arkitektfirmaet Hovaldt
DTU, Institut for Bygge og Anlæg
Egetæpper
Ejendomscenteret, Gladsaxe
Kommune
Emcon
Lejerbo
Sophienberg Ejendomsudvikling
LIVINGlab by DOVISTA
Soundport
Lendager Arkitekter
Stockvad & Kerstens
Balslev Rådgivende Ingrinører
Bascon
Bech-Bruun
Enemærke & Petersen
Lyngkilde
Erik Møller Arkitekter
Strunge Jensen Rådgivende
Ingeniører
F.R.I Sweco Architects
Bertelsen & Schewing Arkitekter
Esbensen Rådgivende Ingeniører
BIG - Bjarke Ingels Group
Faaborg-Midtfyn kommune
Det Kongelige Danske
Kunstakademis Skoler for
Arkitektur, Design og Konservering Søren Jensen Rådg. Ing.
(KADK)
Mangor & Nagel
TATA Steel
Bjerg arkitektur
Finansgruppen Nordic
Middelfart commune
Tegnestuen Mejeriet
Botjek Center Sønderjylland
Frederikssund Kommune
MidtConsult
Teknologisk Institut
B. Nygaard Sørensen
Freja Ejendomme
Mosa Tiles
Tetris
BBP ARKITEKTER
Gottlieb Paludan Arkitekter
NNE Pharmaplan
Troldtekt
BRIX & Kamp
Forbo Flooring
Nordea Ejendomme
University College Nordjylland
Brødrene Dahl
Ginnerup Arkitekter
Nøhr & Sigsgaard
Velux
Business Center Bornholm
Byggesocietetet
Dan Ejendomme
GPP Arkitekter
Viegand Maagøe
Hansen
Næstved Kommune, Videnscenter
for Bæredygtigt Byggeri
Nøhr & Sigsgaard
Erhvervsakademiet Lillebælt –
Bygningskonstruktøruddannelsen
Casa Arkitekter
Hansen, Carlsen & Frølund
OBH Rådgivende Ingeniører
Østergaard Arkitekter
Harde Larsen
Østre Havn & Coop Invest
Carlsen & Frølund
Henning Larsen Architects
Odense Kommune, By og
Kulturforvaltningen
Ole Hagen Arkitekter
CEBRA
H+H danmark
Oluf Jørgensen
PERSONAL MEMBERS
Cetonia
Hoffmann
PE North West Europe
BM Arkitekter
C.F. Møller
Holscher Arkitekter
Pluskontoret
KS Miljø & arkitektur
C.W. Obel Ejendomme
Ingeniør’ne
PLH Arkitekter
EDUCATION/ RESEARCH
FINANCE
PUBLIC SECTOR/ GOVERNMENT
REAL ESTATE/ HOUSING
ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER
OTHER BUSINESS/ COMMERCIAL
Arkitektfirmaet Kjær & Richter
Arkitektfirmaet NORD
Vilhelm Lauritzen Arkitekter
BUILDING ENTREPRENEUR
A9 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A3.04 GBC-Dk Membership Jul.2014 - Premium (DGNB, 2014)
PREMIUM MEMBERS
DERBIGUM
MTH Høgaard
SEB
Alectia
DS Certificering
NCC
Sneider Electric
ATP Ejendomme
EKJ
NIRAS
Skanska
Briggen
ETA
Nordea
Statens ByggefForskningsInstitut
Bygitegl
Forsvaret
Pension Denmark
Teknologisk Institut
By & Havn
Grontmij
Ramboll
Vandkunsten
C.F. Møller
HennebyNielson
Cronberg Recool
Wessberg
COWI
Isover
Region Syddanmark
White
Danske Arkitekt Virksomheder
Miljøforum Fyn
Region Nordjylland
DEAS
MOE
Rockwool
EDUCATION/ RESEARCH
FINANCE
PUBLIC SECTOR/ GOVERNMENT
REAL ESTATE/ HOUSING
ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER
OTHER BUSINESS/ COMMERCIAL
BUILDING ENTREPRENEUR
TAB. A3.05 GBC-Dk Board of Directors Oct.2014 (dk-gbc.dk, 2014)
DIRECTORS
(Firms, Organisations)
‘Committed to the Board’
NCC
SBi
NCC
Rambøll
Isover
Miljøforum Fyn
Danske Arkitekt Virksomheder
COWI
Region Nordjylland
Pension Denmark
EDUCATION/ RESEARCH
FINANCE
PUBLIC SECTOR/ GOVERNMENT
REAL ESTATE/ HOUSING
ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER
OTHER BUSINESS/ COMMERCIAL
BUILDING ENTREPRENEUR
A10 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A3.06 Membership in GBC-Dk, July 2014 (GBCD,2014)
Number of votes in Number of Board of Directors eligibility
Category Number of
memberships general meeting
potential
for each member
votes
Board
Board members and Chairman
8+2
Eligible for both the Board and
Chairman post
Premium
37
6
222
Basic
2
4
8
Support
162
2
324
Not eligible for election to the Board
Personal
6
1
6
Not eligible for election to the Board
Eligible for election to the Board
TAB. A3.07 Member Backgrounds in GBC-Dk, July 2014 (GBCD,2014)
Membership Educational Public
Architecture/ Building
Category
/ Research sector/
engineering Entregovernment
preneur
Finance Real
Estate /
Housing
Other
business /
orgs.
Board
1
1
3
1+1
1
-
2
Premium
4
2
14
2
3
4
7
Basic
2
1
2
-
-
-
1
Support
10
6
74
9
6
14
37
Personal
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
A11 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A3.08 Founding Members - DGNB Germany, June 2007 (Die DGNB, 2012 [SS])
Membership
ALware Andreas Lahme
Ansorg GmbH
Apfelböck Ingenieurbüro GmbH
ARCADIS Deutschland GmbH
Architektenkammer Ba-Wü
Architektur Contor Müller Schlüter
ATP Architekten und Ingenieure
AUTODESK
GmbH
Bartenbach LichtLabor GmbH
BASF AG
bauperformance GmbH
Büro für integrierten Umweltschutz
BuildDesk GmbH
BWM Dübel + Montagetechnik GmbH
CBP Consulting Engineers AG
CORPUS COGNITO
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD
Deutsche Amphibolin Werke v. R. Murjahn Stiftung &
Co. KG; Deutsche Bank AG
Domino Planungsgesellschaft Architekten und
Ingenieure mbH
drymix.info
Drees & Sommer Advanced Building Technologies
GmbH
Ebert-Consulting Group (EFEU e.V. Verein zur
Förderung von Energie und Umweltschutz e.V.)
EGS-plan Ingenieurgesellschaft für Energie- und
Gebäude- und Solartechnik mbH
energydesign Braunschweig GmbH
ERM GmbH; Evonik Röhm GmbH
Fachverband Baustoffe und Bauteile für vorgehängte
hinterlüftete Fassaden e.V.
Flachglas MarkenKreis GmbH
Foamglas GmbH
Forbo Flooring GmbH
FPS – Fritze Paul Seelig Rechtsanwälte
GAP Architekten
Gehl Architekten
GERBER ARCHITEKTEN international GmbH
HafenCity Hamburg GmbH
Hansgrohe AG
Happold Ingenieurbüro GmbH
Harry Hirsch Consult
Hascher Jehle Architektur
HeidelbergCement AG
HHS Planer + Architekten AG
HOCHTIEF AG; Hoffereck + Findt Architekten
Hoppe Bauplanung
Horst Bossenmayer
Hydro Building Systems GmbH
IB Leiser
Icade Reim Deutschland GmbH
ifa-Bau Consult GmbH
INBG AG - Institut für nachhaltiges Bauen und
Gestalten AG
Ingenhoven Architekten GmbH
Ingenieurbüro Gänßmantel
Ingenieurbüro Peters
Ingenieurkammer Ba-Wü
Institut für Bauforschung e.V.
intep – integrale planung GmbH
Interface Deutschland GmbH
JACKON Insulation GmbH
knp.bauphysik
kuntz und manz architekten
Leinemann & Partner
Lindner AG; mipsHAUS-Institut
Moerser-Architektur-Werkstatt
Nimbus-Group
Océ-Deutschland GmbH
Ohlf Schoch Architekten
Pavatex GmbH; Plan / Concept AG
POLIS Immobilien AG
Prösler Kommunikation
REDEVCO Services Deutschland GmbH
RWTH Aachen, Lehrstuhl für Stahlbau- und
Leichtmetallbau
SAINT GOBAIN ISOVER G+H AG
Scherzer Architekten Partnerschaft
Schlenther Architekten
Scholze Consulting GmbH
sol·id·ar planungswerkstatt
STEICO AG
Stewen Architekturgesellschaft
Svend Ulmer
Taylor Wessing
Transsolar Energietechnik GmbH
TU Braunschweig, Institut für Gebäude- und
Solartechnik
TU Darmstadt, FB Architektur, FG Entwerfen und
Energieeffizientes Bauen
TU Darmstadt, Institut für Baubetrieb
TU Dortmund, Fakultät Architektur und
Bauingenieurwesen, Lehrstuhl Baubetrieb und
Bauprozessmanagement
TÜV Rheinland Group; TU München
Union Investment Real Estate AG
Universität Freiburg, Physikalisches Institut/ Solare
Energiesysteme
URS Deutschland
Verein Deutscher Zementwerke e.V.
Vereinigung der Prüfingenieure in Baden-Württemberg
VHT Versuchsanstalt für Holz- und Trockenbau
4a Architekten
Visplay International GmbH
Vitra Logistik GmbH
Vizona GmbH
werk.um architekten
Witte Projektmangement GmbH (Status 31.12.2007)
A12 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB. A3.09 Initiators - DGNB Germany, June 2007 (Die DGNB, 2012 [SS])
Initiators
Alcan Composites
AUB Arbeitsgemeinschaft Umweltverträgliches
Bauprodukt e.V.
Behnisch Architekten
CalCon Holding GmbH
DU Diederichs Projektmanagement AG & Co. KG
Eternit AG
Fachhochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin
Five Winds International
GfÖB – Gesellschaft für Ökologische Bautechnik
Hines Immobilien GmbH
Ingenieurbüro Trinius
L2 Architekten
nora systems GmbH
PE INTERNATIONAL GmbH
sauerbruch hutton
Universität Stuttgart
Werner Sobek Ingenieure Stuttgart
A13 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX FIG. A3.10 Green Turnover by Industry (DEA, 2012)
A14 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX TAB.3.20 Contrasting socio-technical practices in nice and regime (adapted from Smith, 2007)
Socio-technical
dimension
Mainstream building
Økologiske’-building
Green-building certification
(Danish ecological building) projects
Niche-market in
building sector
Commercial, Residential,
Insitutional
Mostly Residential SingleHousing and Mixed-Use
Family Detached or Clustered (typically commercial,
residential, institutional)
Guiding
principles
Profit and loss. High external
inputs.
Ecology. Independence (Offgrid, autonomous). Minimise
ecological footprint within cost
constraints.
Technologies
Proven, standardSmall-scale off-grid services.
technologies. Grid services.
Natural/ reclaimed materials.
Routine, bulk purchasing.
Green supplies and systems.
Listed suppliers.
Slow innovation based mainly
on growing expectations for
‘green’-solutions, esp.
regarding energy-use/ costs.
Mix of tried and tested, with
BAT and innovation. Bulkpurchasing when possible.
Natural/ reclaimed materials
and ‘green’ supplies and
systems. Mix of grid and local
services.
Industrial
structure
Speculative, volume building
or bespoke solutions,
depending on client-type and
contact structure.
Subcontracted labour.
Construction costs are
decisive. Profit from
contracted price. Large,
repetitive projects bring
economics of scale but are
subject to larger liabilities.
Bespoke building. Specialist
builders. LCA + LCC.
Premium for sustainable
features. Learn from
correcting faults. Few
economies of scale.
Idiosyncratic designs.
Mix of ‘green’-speculative
building and bespoke.
Combination of industrial
structures from both
mainstream and ‘eco’building. Economies of scale
when available. LCA + LCC
Certification systems typically
begin with focus on individual
buildings, and later introduce
urban area schemes.
User relations
and markets
Traditionally passive and
conservative consumers.
Increasing market
expectations for ‘green’solutions.
Active commitment to a green Active commitment to
lifestyle. High user
sustainability. Userinvolvement or self-build.
involvement varies. Self-build
rarely happens, partly due to
complexity of system
demands.
Policy and
regulations
Minimum land-use planning
and building regulations are
followed. Lobby to control the
pace of environmental
standards.
Land-use planning and
building regulations can be a
constraint. Lobby to
accelerate the pace of
environmental standards.
Highest land-use planning
and building regulations
usually considered as
baseline, to be improved
upon. Lobby to accelerate the
pace of environmental
standards.
Knowledge
Most knowledge focused on
existing competencies and
business practice. Depending
on client and contract type,
can favour standard designs
with developers choosing to
maximise construction profits.
A growing market demand for
‘green’-design abilities.
Knowledge relevant to
reducing the ecological
footprint. Site specifics count,
e.g. solar orientation, waste
water treatment and recycling.
Mix of business-oriented
mainstream and
‘sustainability’ competencies
and knowledge. Site specific
solutions.
Special consultants normally
required during projectplanning and certification.
Culture
Markets and regulation
Sustainable housing
Markets, regulations &
standards, LCA + LCC,
sustainability/green-lifestyle.
LCA and LCC. Normally
market oriented, but energy
and ecology also prioritised.
Minimise ecological footprint
within cost constraints.
1. LCA = Life Cycle Analysis. LCC = Life Cycle Costing.
A15 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX DGNB Project Questionnaire
Interview Questions
Rodney F Cottrell ([email protected]), Teksam K3, RUC, Fall 2014
Responses
Danske eller engelsk. Svarerne kunne blive oversat.
Completeness encouraged. Partial responses are fine.
part 1: YOUR ROLE
What is your job position and
background?
Professional memberships?
(name of organisation(s))
What experience or background if
any have you had with the DGNB
or DGNB-UA?
part 2: BUILDING CAPACITY - Near-future outlook for system
What would you suggest as
possible near-future
opportunities GBC-Denmark’s
DGNB?
What would you suggest as
possible near-future barriers
GBC-Denmark’s DGNB?
part 3: BUILDING CAPACITY - Long-term outlook for system
What would you suggest as
possible long-term opportunities
GBC-Denmark and the DGNB?
What would you suggest as
possible long-term barriers
GBC-Denmark and the DGNB?
part 4: BUILDING CAPACITY - Main challenges for institutionalisation
What could be some main
challenges to institutionalising
DGNB certification in Denmark?
(Where institutionalisation means
establishing itself securely as an
broadly accepted norm in
Denmark's building sector)
Have you any ideas as to how
these challenges might be
reduced or overcome?
A16 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3
The DNGB as a proto-­‐institution for sustainable transition in Denmark -­‐ APPENDIX Interview Questions
Responses
Danske eller engelsk. Svarerne kunne blive oversat.
Completeness encouraged. Partial responses are fine.
part 5: BUILDING CAPACITY - Partners and network-contacts
Who would you suggest as good
working partners to assist GBCDenmark to develop and improve
the DGNB or DGNB-UA?
e.g. Name of ‘actors’, groups,
institutions, organisations, etc.
Who would you suggest as good
network contacts to complement
and promote GBC-Denmark and
the DGNB?
e.g. Name of ‘actors’, groups,
institutions, organisations, etc.
part 6: PROGRAM’S CHARACTER
Do you think other certification
systems may be as legitimate for
use in Denmark?
Do you think the use of multiple
certification systems in Denmark
is valid?
Is it best to have a single
certification system in Denmark?
Should urban sustainability
certification be nation-wide?
Should Urban Certification be
carried-out by …
Public Sector?
Private Sector?
‘Third Sector’
e.g. NGOs?
Shared effort?
(mark below
and sectors)
(set ‘X’ under preferred choice)
part 7: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Any additional comments?
Your email contact, if you wish
to be notified of the final report
THANK YOU! MANGE TAK!
A17 Rodney F Co*rell -­‐ Roskilde University -­‐ Teksam K3