Group’s results – 9M2014 November 11, 2014 Quarter highlights The development of main aggregates continued with Loans to Customers up by 4.3% YoY, compared with +2.8% YoY at the end of June 2014, and AUM up almost 20%YoY, compared with +16.1% at the end of 1H14 Operating Income in 3Q14, net of Trading and Performance Fees, continued to grow (+0.3% QoQ and +9.2% YoY), despite the usual negative seasonality Net Interest Income was up 8.6% YoY and up 2.8% QoQ, because of the expansion of volumes and the reduction of the cost of funding Non Interest Income, net of Trading and Performance Fees, was remarkably up YoY (+9.8%) but down QoQ (-2.1%) mostly because of unfavorable seasonality. The same aggregate, including also the more volatile components was up 3.8% QoQ, as a result of Trading’s performance Operating Costs performed in line with expectations (+6.6% YoY), coherently with the strategy implemented by the Group (+6.8% YoY including D&A). The aggregate is down 4.5% QoQ because of seasonality Net Adjustments to Loans increased significantly both YoY and QoQ due to the update of the model to calculate collective provisions, accordingly with Comprehensive Assessment’s results. The normalized cost of risk on a yearly basis would have been 41 bps compared to 43 bps in 9M13 3Q14 Net Profit was up 0.7% YoY despite the additional provisioning on loans amounting to almost €25million. 9M14 Net Profit was up 28% YoY 2 Income Statement 3Q13 2Q14 3Q14 % vs. 3Q13 % vs. 2Q14 9M13 9M14 % a/a Operating Income 234.4 256.0 264.5 12.8 3.3 737.2 807.2 9.5 Operating Income net of Trading and Performance Fees 229.3 249.6 250.3 9.2 0.3 691.9 747.4 8.0 -147.1 -164.2 -156.8 6.6 -4.5 -459.4 -487.7 6.2 Depreciation & Amortization -8.9 -9.8 -9.8 10.1 0.0 -25.8 -28.8 11.6 Operating Profit 78.4 82.0 97.9 24.9 19.4 252.0 290.7 15.4 Net Adj. To Loans -21.4 -17.6 -46.8 118.7 165.9 -69.3 -77.9 12.4 -6.2 -1.6 -1.0 n.a. n.a. -9.1 -4.9 n.a. 0.5 2.0 -0.8 n.a. n.a. -1.2 -0.4 n.a. 51.3 64.8 49.3 -3.9 -23.9 172.4 207.5 20.4 -22.0 -22.8 -19.8 -10.0 -13.2 -72.1 -79.0 9.6 29.3 42.0 29.5 0.7 -29.8 100.3 128.5 28.1 Euro, million Operating Costs Provision for Risks and Charges Extraord. Income/Expenses Pre Tax Profit Taxes/Minorities Net Profit Operating Income net of Trading and Performance Fees continued to expand both QoQ and YoY, while Operating Costs, mostly due to investments, grew at a lower pace 9M14 Net Profit, even if penalized by higher provisions on collective provisions, posted a solid growth YoY (+28%) 3 Operating Income evolution Operating Income (net of Trading and Performance Fees) Euro, Million 255 250 245 240 235 230 225 220 215 210 248 250 250 244 231 223 230 232 229 225 219 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 Core revenues continued to increase despite third quarter is usually weak because of a negative seasonality that affects fee’s income 4 Net Interest Income (1/3) Net Interest Income 123.6 122.2 125.6 121.3 The Net Interest Income was back to growth QoQ (+2.8%) benefitting from higher average loans’ volumes as well as lower charges on funding, especially related to institutional bonds 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 As for Customer’s Spread, after the positive trend seen in the first six months of 2014, the sharp interest rates decrease occurred in 3Q14 (and expected to continue also in the final quarter of 2014), penalized significantly the aggregate Euro, Million 130 120 116.7 115.7 110 112.6 100 90 Euribor and BTP/Bund spread evolution Quarterly Customers’ Spread (Credem SpA management accounting) 0.4% 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 3.39 2.11 1.29 3.35 2.09 3.28 2.03 1.26 1.24 3.30 2.22 3.38 2.38 3.31 2.36 3.12 2.22 294 350 280 0.3% 1.00 0.94 0.90 0.2% 0.23% 0.24% spread 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 average loan rate 1Q14 2Q14 300 250 159 154 140 0.17% 0.1% 200 150 100 0.11% 0.0% 1Q13 0.30% 0.31% 236 196 0.21% 0.21% 1.08 259 50 0 3Q14 average deposit rate Euribor 3 months Spread BTP vs. Bund (10 years) 5 bps Net Interest Income (2/3) 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Evolution of Average Loan Rate Evolution of Average Deposit Rate (Credem SpA management accounting) (Credem SpA management accounting) % 3.77 3.39 3.88 3.31 -0.51% -0.51% -0.42% -0.51% -0.38% 3.89 3.38 3.81 3.30 3.79 3.28 3.77 3.35 2.50 3.78 3.12 -0.57% % 2.03 2.00 -0.66% 1.50 1.29 1.26 1.24 1.08 1.83 0.81% 1.00 1.00 1.73 1.63 0.83% 0.79% 0.94 0.74% 0.90 0.50 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 0.00 1Q13 Credem: Average loan rate 2.15 2.22 0.30% 2.15 2.36 0.17% 2.06 2.38 0.31% 1.92 2.22 0.37% 1.86 2.03 1.78 2.09 1.50 1.74 2.11 2.00 0.32% 0.22% 1.00 0.50 0.00 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 Credem: Spread 3Q13 Credem: Average deposit rate (Credem SpA management accounting) 2.50 2Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 Industry: Average loan rate Evolution of Average Customers’ Spread % 1.99 1.93 1.89 0.75% 0.73% 0.69% 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 0.07% Industry: Average deposit rate The comparison with the industry clearly highlights Group’s growth strategy as pricing policy is aimed at increasing loan’s volumes On the other hand, the significant reduction of the cost of funding associated to deposits experienced in the last 21 months (-39 bps compared to 1Q13) limits the room for a further descend, penalizing bank customers’ spread Industry: Spread Source: ABI Monthly Outlook October 2014 6 Net Interest Income (3/3) Latest Credem Covered Bonds issues to institutional investors Date Jun-’11 Jul-’13 Feb-’14 Oct-’14 3 7 5 7 Amount (€,million) 500 500 750 750 Orders gathered on issuance amount 1.8 3.2 3.3 4.0 Maturity (years) • The further reduction of BTP-Bund spread, paired with the outcome of the ECB’s Comprehensive Assessment which confirmed Group’s quality and solidness, also in comparison with other Italian and European financial institutions, • reducing potential institutional investors’ uncertainties • lowering correlation between sovereign yields and the cost of funding for banks, Regional Distribution of investors Italy 55% 44% 36% 29% Germany/ Austria 18% 28% 35% 33% Nordics 6% 7% 6% 5% France 5% 6% 5% 15% 13% 10% 4% 7% Switzerland 5% 4% Asia 1% 4% 8% 3% UK/Ireland Other 3% 5% BTP-Bund Spread at the date (bps) 178 274 189 162 Spread of the issue* 140 180 88 25 enable a further reduction in the cost of wholesale funding, even in comparison with recent issuances • It is also interesting to note that the portion issued to local investors progressively contracted, revealing a trend toward the normalization of financial markets * Spread calculated on mid-swap rate, meaning the interbanking market rate at the date corresponding to the maturity of the issue 7 Non Interest Income Non Interest Income: Quarterly Evolution 163.1 Performance Fees € Million Trading Other Banking Fees Insurance Income Asset Management Fees 165 150 135 120 105 90 75 60 45 30 15 0 NII net of Trading and Perform. Fees 145.8 118.7 9M13 9M14 +32.9% 28 37 4.5 5.4 4.9 3.8 39.1 11.8 4.5 5 4.5 51.3 49.2 52.5 49.5 47.9 49.9 48.4 10.5 9.9 7.3 9.7 11.8 13.4 11.6 52 51.9 51.9 54.9 58.1 61.2 60.9 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 117.8 115.5 113.6 122.7 123.9 127.4 124.7 307 328 +6.8% 138.9 27.6 4 Non Interest Income: YoY Comparison 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 133.8 136.8 127.7 +30.0% 44 58 +1.4% 13 13 10.7 3.4 5.6 13.2 Non Interest Income is affected by the negative seasonality, as well as in 2013, but, net of trading and performance fees, was close to the peak from the beginning of 2012 All aggregates were up YoY, in particular Insurance Income and, in absolute values, Net Fees performed very well 8 Operating Costs Operating Costs: Quarterly Evolution Euro, million Employees 200 150 Networks 157.8 154.5 147.1 153.9 48.6 49.4 45.6 46.9 166.7 164.2 156.8 54 51.7 47.9 100 6,200 6,000 5,800 5,600 5,400 5,200 5,993 5,740 5,544 5,519 5,604 5,609 5,729 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 9M14 50 109.2 105.1 101.5 107.0 112.7 112.5 108.9 Financial Advisers 1.500 0 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 Payroll Costs 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 Admin. Expenses Third quarter’s seasonality had a positive impact on Operating Costs (-4.5% QoQ) even if YoY comparison (3Q14 vs. 3Q13: +6.6%) remains in line group’s strategy on investments already reported in recent quarters (9M14 vs. 9M13: +6.2%) All networks grew also in the 3Q14, in line with recent trends 1.000 1.002 1.006 885 795 750 770 795 500 0 Crecasa and Salary Backed Loans Agents 600 400 200 98 158 217 272 359 353 387 0 9 Loans Loans to Customers (net of Repos with Institutional and Loans to Group’s SPVs) 21,000 18,000 15,000 12,000 9,000 6,000 3,000 0 € Mil. 17,536 18,770 19,949 19,721 19,270 19,938 20,107 3,323 3,324 3,370 3,150 3,056 3,165 2,577 5,534 5,845 6,282 6,241 6,151 6,127 6,161 1,941 1,935 2,001 2,042 2,002 2,014 2,070 7,484 7,667 8,114 8,296 7,967 8,742 8,710 2009 2010 2011 2012 9M13 2013 9M14 18,884 19,995 20,643 19,409 19,938 20,275 Loans to Customers 17,536 (B.S. – Line 70 ) Short-Term Loans Leasing Growing loans’ volumes (+4.3% YoY) were paired by the aggressive policy showed in terms of loans rates. The growth in volumes was mainly driven by short term lending, (+9.3% YoY) with long term performing anyhow well in every aggregate (leasing, residential mortgages and other long term loans) Volumes’ growth remained coherent with a large concentration of loans to customers belonging to the best 4 rating classes, whose percentage topped in the quarter its historical maximum Residential Mortgage Other Loans Corporate Loans distribution by Rating (Credem SpA management accounting) 90% 80% 70% 73% 77% 77% 78% 2011 2012 2013 82% 67% 60% 50% 2009 2010 9M14 % of corporate loans in top 4 rating classes 10 Loans: comparison with the Industry Loans to Retail and Public Sector Growth Rates (Credem SpA management accounting) 7.0% 8.0% 6.0% Market shares on retail and corporate customers and small business (net of financial institutions) 4.2% 4.0% 5.1% 4.3% 2.2% 1.3% 1.198% 1.2% 0.0% -2.0% -2.3% -3.9% 2010 2011 2012 2013 1.155% 1.2% -0.1% -1.1% -4.0% -6.0% 1.280% 1.3% 1.2% 2.0% 1.324% 1.4% 1.1% 1.068% 1.1% 9M14 1.0% dec. 2010 dec. 2011 dec. 2012 dec. 2013 aug. 2014 Industry Credem overperformance (∆ %) Credem MS on Performing Loans 0.6% 2.8 2.9 2,3 3.8 6.6 0.5% 0.5% Credem Group’s growth trend is totally divergent in comparison with the Industry. As a result, the market share in performing loans grew by 30% in the last three years and an half 0.548% 0.6% 0.453% 0.443% 0.434% 0.425% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% dec. 2010 dec. 2011 dec. 2012 dec. 2013 aug. 2014 MS on Gross NPLs Source: ABI Monthly Outlook Ottobre 2014; Bankit data: data flows from “Matrice dei Conti Bankit “(Bastra1) since December 2011, Bankit Public database (Bollettino Bankit) until November 2011 11 Deposits, Bonds and AUM The Group continued to grow also on Customers’ Funding, where the low level of interest rates drove to a significant growth especially on AUM 2011 2012 2013 1H14 9M14 12,005 13,066 13,625 13,687 14,083 493 256 260 307 322 43 - - - - 12,541 13,322 13,885 13,994 14,405 4,817 1,721 3,096 4,149 879 3,270 4,187 1,131 3,056 4,349 1,381 2,968 4,079 1,366 2,713 Direct Dep, & Retail Bonds 15,637 16,592 16,941 16,962 17,118 Ins, Reserves 2,506 2,617 3,236 3,921 4,228 Portfolio Management 3,859 3,747 3,766 4,258 4,450 4 Mutual Funds 3,062 2,944 3,051 3,279 3,354 3 SICAVs 4,454 5,047 5,314 5,935 5,953 2 Other & Third Parties Products 3,415 4,478 5,556 6,050 6,554 14,790 16,216 17,687 19,522 20,311 Euro, million Sight/ Saving Deposits CD & Other Deposits Repos Direct Deposits Bonds -Institutional -Retail In 3Q14 only, Credem Group was able to increase AUM volumes by €800 million, Insurance Reserves by €300 million and Direct Deposits and Retail Bonds by €150 million Bonds’ duration kept on increasing. Such movement will be confirmed also in the next quarter as a result of the recent issuance of a 7 year covered bond Bonds Current Duration (years) AUM (Credem SpA management accounting) 3.3 3.5 2013 1Q14 3.8 1.6 1 0 2012 9M14 12 Credit Quality Gross Impaired Loans 2013 1Q14 1H14 9M14 € Million 9M13 825.5 774.2 804.2 740.8 702.1 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 421.1 433.6 430.6 446.4 438.4 127.0 111.0 Gross NPLs Gross Watchlist/Restructured Loans % on Loans(Credem) 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.9 2.1 % on Loans (Industry) 7.3 7.9 8.3 8.6 9.2* 5.3 2.1 5.5 2.1 2.1 5.9 6.0 2.1 87.4 87.5 99.1 Gross Past Due 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.5 Quarterly Average Gross Impaired Loans’ net flows (€, Million) 80 70 70 60 50 42 46 50 40 30 25 27 2010 2011 26 20 10 • Impaired Loans kept on increasing, especially in the NPLs aggregate, despite quarterly average gross impaired loans’ net flows (calculated as quarterly average increase of total «Gross Impaired Loans»**) decreased significantly in the 9M14. Moreover, such aggregate is very close to its minimum observed in 2010 and 2011 2009 2012 2013 9M13 9M14 (*) *Value at August 2014 (source: ABI Monthly Outlook) Source: ABI; internal calculation on Bank of Italy figures (**) 9M14 €26 million has been calculated according to the following formula: Gross Impaired Loans as at the end of September 2014 (€1,363 million) – Gross Impaired Loans as at the end of 2013 (€1,285 million) divided by 3 (as the three quarters between December 2013 and September 2014) 13 Impaired Loans coverage Net Impaired Loans Euro, Million 9M13 2013 1Q14 1H14 9M14 Net NPLs 314.1 310.0 318.9 327.1 337.4 Net Watchlist 339.8 350.2 359.8 366.2 358.4 Net Restructured 24.6 23.1 15.2 22.3 20.4 Net Past Due 120.0 105.1 82.9 83.1 94.0 Total Net Impaired Loans 798.5 788.4 776.8 798.7 810.2 Impaired Loans’ coverage increased to almost 41%, while NPLs’ Coverage remained slightly above 59%, in line with the maximum levels of the last four years Net Impaired Loans NPLs’ Coverage (%) 60 58 58.2 57.4 56.0 56 58.8 Impaired Loans’ Coverage (%) 59.3 59.1 42 40 38 55.4 34 52 32 40.3 40.6 1Q14 1H14 9M14 38.7 36.3 36 54 39.9 35.8 35.0 30 50 2010 2011 2012 2013 1Q14 1H14 9M14 2010 2011 2012 2013 14 The Coprehensive Assessment certified the adequacy of Credem Group’s coverage policy 11,80 11.80 0.40 3,00 3.00 8.40 8,40 Adverse Stress Test impact CET1 post AQR and Adverse Stress Test 3,40 3.40 6.10 6,10 Adverse Stress Test impact CET1 post AQR and Adverse Stress Test 1,97 1.97 8,89 8.89 Adverse Stress Test impact CET1 post AQR and Adverse Stress Test SSM CET1 2013 10,20 10.20 AQR impact 0.70 ITA CET1 2013 10.95 10,95 AQR impact 0.09 Credem CET1 2013 AQR impact 15 First banking Group in Italy in the adverse scenario and second in the baseline scenario, in terms of capital ratios Bank Name FY13 CET1 Ratio Delta AQR (bps) B1 CET1 Ratio AQR adjusted Correction for the Baseline Scenario (bps) CET1 Ratio post Baseline Scenario Correction for the Adverse Scenario (bps) CET1 Ratio post Adverse Scenario (B3 = B1 + B2) B4 (B5= B3 + B4) B6 (B7 = B3 + B6) Credito Emiliano 10.95% -9 10.86% 5 10.91% -197 8.89% UniCredit 9.77% -19 9.58% -8 9.50% -279 6.79% Mediobanca - Banca di Credito Finanziario 9.25% -85 8.40% 60 9.00% -217 6.24% Banca Popolare Di Milano 7.29% -40 6.89% -35 6.54% -293 3.97% Intesa Sanpaolo 11.95% -25 11.70% -48 11.23% -339 8.31% Iccrea Holding 11.08% -44 10.64% 19 10.83% -328 7.36% Banca Popolare Dell'Emilia Romagna 9.15% -78 8.37% -4 8.33% -316 5.22% Banca Popolare di Sondrio 8.15% -78 7.37% -13 7.24% -317 4.20% UBI 12.25% -44 11.82% -94 10.88% -362 8.20% Veneto Banca S.C.P.A. 7.33% -163 5.70% 8 5.78% -296 2.73% Banca Piccolo Credito Valtellinese 8.79% -127 7.52% -57 6.95% -401 3.51% Banco Popolare 10.06% -212 7.94% -124 6.70% -320 4.73% Banca Popolare di Vicenza 9.37% -179 7.59% -13 7.46% -441 3.17% Banca Carige S.P.A. - Cassa di Risparmio di Genova e Imperia 5.17% -129 3.88% -154 2.34% -624 -2.36% Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena 10.19% -320 6.99% -97 6.01% -687 -0.09% CREDEM RANKING 4° ° 3° ° 2° ° 1° ° 16 The only banking group in Italy not asked to correct its provisioning on the base of the sample check of its assets Bank Name Provisioning adjustment projected Provisioning adjustment on on total portfolio on the base of the sample check (D.C1) sample check (D.D1) Adjustment on collective provision (D.E1) Total Adjustment (D.C1+D.D1+D.E1) (bps) (mill. EUR) (bps) (mill. EUR) (bps) (mill. EUR) (bps) (mill. EUR) Credito Emiliano -0.7 -1 0.0 0 12.9 21 -12.2 20 UniCredit 11.8 482 2.7 111 9.3 380 -23.8 973 Intesa Sanpaolo 16.4 466 0.3 8 17.5 498 -34.2 972 Banca Popolare Di Milano 38.8 168 12.3 53 6.0 26 -57.0 248 Iccrea Holding 15.1 20 24.6 33 21.0 28 -60.7 82 UBI 31.4 199 26.3 167 3.7 24 -61.4 390 Banca Popolare Dell'Emilia Romagna 42.6 185 32.1 139 36.0 156 -110.7 480 Banca Popolare di Sondrio 68.9 163 14.1 33 33.2 78 -116.2 274 69.4 351 0.1 1 51.7 262 -121.2 614 93.8 216 40.8 94 46.2 106 -180.8 416 91.1 165 74.3 134 16.2 29 -181.7 329 Veneto Banca 109.7 276 45.4 114 71.8 181 -226.9 571 Banca Popolare di Vicenza 44.2 126 86.3 246 120.3 343 -250.8 714 Banco Popolare 85.5 451 96.5 510 113.6 600 -295.6 1,561 Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena 135.3 1,130 263.1 2,196 102.3 854 -500.7 4,180 Mediobanca - Banca di Credito Finanziario Banca Carige S.P.A. - Cassa di Risparmio di Genova e Imperia Banca Piccolo Credito Valtellinese Gross figures not netted by fiscal effects 17 Cost of Risk Cost of Risk (bps) 59 60 47 52 46 39 37 40 47 43 42 39 41 20 27 31 1Q14 1H14 0 1Q13 1H13 9M13 2013 Cost of risk Cost of risk (net of non recurrent items) Cost of Risk: historical evolution (bps) 80 Crack Parmalat 70 70 62 59 60 44 50 40 30 35 31 35 34 27 21 19 20 20 10 9M14 7 The choice of updating the model to calculate collective provisions, raised significantly the Cost of Risk in the third quarter, in comparison with 31 bps performance posted in 1H14 If normalized, accounting non recurrent provision of almost €25 million in the quarter, the cost of risk would have been 41 bps, in line with the normalized level observed in 2013 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 18 Assets & Liabilities 21,000 20,275 20,372 Assets (Euro, million) 14,000 4,315 0 Fin. Assets held for trading* 711 920 9M14 8 8 199 170 3,983 7,000 5,081 5,941 1H14 Fin. Assets at Fin. Assets fair value* av. for sale* Fin. Assets (insurance companies)* Due from banks Loans stable Loans to customers 0 ECB exposure at €2.2 billion 2,351 1H14 2,304 4,228 3,921 2,713 735 1,500 2,350 401 405 2,925 1,366 5,000 1,381 10,000 4,030 15,000 2,968 13,994 20,000 Equity 14,405 Clientele to Customers were On the liabilities’ side short term funding decreased significantly Liabilities (Euro, million) Institutional Securities in AFS decreased by almost €800 million in the quarter as a result of the Trading activity that took advantage by the favorable trend in value, mostly on government bonds issued by foreign countries 9M14 €735 million TLTRO line was included in the aggregate, while late October’s €750 million Covered Bond issue is not yet in accounting figures (*) 9M14 figures based on internal calculations 19 Banking Group’s Securities Portfolio Variazione degli impieghi alla clientela Securities’ Portfolio Breakdown (Credem SpA Management Accounting) 100% 90% 57% The active management of the portfolio, that caused a reduction of the aggregate in the quarter of almost €800 million, also changed the asset mix of the aggregate, as the reduction affected mainly government bonds issued by foreign countries 18% In particular, Italian government bonds incidence, went up from 49% at the end of June, to 57% at the end of September, while this portion of the portfolio remained stable in the amount 80% 51% 70% 49% 62% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 24% 28% 10% 12% 10% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 2013 1Q14 1H14 9M14 16% 9M14 Italian govies’ incidence is however definitely lower than the level of 62% reached at December 2013 0% Other no-Italy Other Italy Gov. No-Italy/ EFSF/ EIB Gov. Italy 20 Liquidity Ratios NSFR 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 124% 113% 106% 2012 Both ratios showed levels remarkably above future thresholds set by the regulation Last Covered Bond’s issue, not yet included in the 9M14 aggregates, will further raise the level of the ratios 2013 9M14E LCR ECB eligible securities at the end of 9M14 were €2.1 billion (6.5% of Total Assets), slightly down QoQ as a result of the anticipated repayment of retained bonds issued by Credem and collateralized by a government guarantee 170% 149% 150% 130% 124% 122% 110% 90% 70% 50% 2012 2013 9M14E Source: internal estimate based on figures as at 30 September 2014 21 Solid Capital Base Capital Coefficienti Ratios Patrimoniali Evolution Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio: 11.29% (Fully phased 11.37%) Total capital ratio: 13.65% (Fully phased 13.78%) 925 2,234.0 1,848.0 946 11.3% 2,273.1 1,850.8 500 996 1,000 2,288.6 1,500 13.7% 11.2% 11.0% 1,768.9 € Million 2,000 13.7% 14.2% 2,500 0 2013 Common Equity Tier 1 1H14 Tier Total Capital 9M14 Excess Capital The Comprehensive Assessment confirmed group’s solid capital position, with ratios in continuous growth: CET1 was at 11.3% compared to 11% at the end of 2013 According to new regulatory framework, quarter’s Net Profit was not included in capital ratios calculation, as the third quarter’s accounts are not subject to auditing 22 Disclaimer and Contacts The manager responsible for preparing the company’s financial reports Mr. Paolo Tommasini of Credito Emiliano S.p.A., declares, pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 154 bis of the Consolidated Law on Finance, that the accounting information contained in this presentation corresponds to the document results, books and accounting records. *** This presentation includes certain forward looking statements, projections, objectives and estimates reflecting the current views of the management of the Company with respect to future events. Forward looking statements, projections, objectives, estimates and forecasts are generally identifiable by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “plan,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “project,” “goal” or “target” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, all statements other than statements of historical facts, including, without limitation, those regarding the Company’s future financial position and results of operations, strategy, plans, objectives, goals and targets and future developments in the markets where the Company participates or is seeking to participate. Due to such uncertainties and risks, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. The Group’s ability to achieve its projected objectives or results is dependent on many factors which are outside management’s control. Actual results may differ materially from (and be more negative than) those projected or implied in the forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking information involves risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results and is based on certain key assumptions. All forward-looking statements included herein are based on information available to the Company as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable law. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Investor Relations Team Daniele Morlini – Head of IR [email protected] +39 0522582785 Paolo Pratissoli [email protected] +39 0522583029 23
© Copyright 2024