CR163 Psychiatric services for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities October 2010 © 2010 Royal College of Psychiatrists College Reports have been approved by a meeting of the Central Policy Coordination Committee and constitute official College policy until they are revised or withdrawn. They are given blue covers and are numbered CR1, CR2, etc. The Royal College of Psychiatrists is a charity registered in England and Wales (228636) and in Scotland (SC038369). COLLEGE REPORT Psychiatric services for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities College Report CR163 October 2010 Royal College of Psychiatrists London Approved by Central Policy Coordination Committee: July 2010 Due for review: 2013 Disclaimer This guidance (as updated from time to time) is for use by members of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. It sets out guidance, principles and specific recommendations that, in the view of the College, should be followed by members. None the less, members remain responsible for regulating their own conduct in relation to the subject matter of the guidance. Accordingly, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the College excludes all liability of any kind arising as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the member either following or failing to follow the guidance. Contents Working Group 4 Executive summary 5 Introduction 6 The population and its needs 11 Characteristics of a model service 19 References 23 Royal College of Psychiatrists 3 Working Group 4 Dr Thomas Berney Royal College of Psychiatrists, Faculty of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Dr Pru Allington-Smith Royal College of Psychiatrists, Faculty of the Psychiatry of Learning Disability http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk Executive summary This document is the revision of the Council Report CR123 (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2004). It deals with psychiatric services for a population that, falling between child and adolescent psychiatry and learning disability psychiatry, is still relatively neglected. The report is intended to complement the steady stream of publications which have been produced across the UK and Ireland over the past decade. The report reviews the provision of a psychiatric service to young people, aged under 18 years and with significant intellectual disabilities, and their families. It starts with an overview of the changing approaches to the psychiatric needs of this population; notably the confusion in terminology (between learning disability and learning difficulties), the shift of emphasis from a service for people with (lifespan) intellectual disability to one for young people, the move to a comprehensive service for young people that extends up to age 18 years and the continued concerns about the transition to adult services. Setting out the current aims of a service, the report describes the population, the high prevalence of associated disorder and its nature, complicated by developmental disability, before going on to describe the variety of interventions required. This includes supportive and diagnostic services as well as a breadth of treatment approaches that range from behavioural to psychodynamic, environmental adaptations and pharmacological measures. The report notes the other demands for research, teaching and training as well as the requirements of the legal system. On this basis, it sets out the characteristics of a model service dealing with its structure, location, personnel and resources. Although the focus is on the psychiatric components, the report recognises that such a service must be multidisciplinary and multi-agency and therefore must be seen within the wider range of services supporting mental health, including education, Social Services, community child health services and other agencies such as the employment support group Connexions. The intent is to provide the basis for a standard specification that can inform negotiations between service commissioners, clinicians and general managers of mental health services. The report is aimed at anyone involved in planning or helping to develop a psychiatric service for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Royal College of Psychiatrists 5 Introduction This report is intended to inform the negotiations between service commissioners, clinicians and general managers of psychiatric services for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their families. It aims to give an overview of the ways in which a service might be provided and the elements for a standard specification that might be adapted for local need. Background The United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by the UK in 1991 and by Ireland in 1992, encouraged the development of services that ‘put children first’ and were integrated with the mainstream. These concepts were consistent with those inherent in the Irish Constitution and in the UK’s Children Act 1989, the latter identifying children with disabilities as ‘children in need’. The Convention’s principles were subsequently embodied in the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 across the UK (amended to include education by various Special Education Needs and Disability Acts between 2001 and 2004), as well as by the Education Acts in the UK (1996) and Ireland (1998). Although these Acts have encouraged a broad and balanced education, they have also made greater demands on the young person. For example, the introduction of a national curriculum for all pupils in England, although broadly welcomed by special schools, imposed additional demands that potentially limit the time and resources available for individual work. Reconfiguration of the National Health Service (NHS), with its increasing emphasis on community provision, accompanied the drive towards services that focused on children and adolescents rather than a particular overriding disability or disorder. Until 20 years ago, psychiatric services for young people were a major component of intellectual disability services. The tidal shift in government policies indicates that now they should be part of a comprehensive child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS), a shift that has coincided with the extension of their age range to 18 years. The increased demand on services, coupled with limited resources, has meant that in many areas young people with an intellectual disability found themselves in limbo and looked to community paediatrics to bridge the gap. In 2005, the Department of Health’s mapping exercise for CAMHS (www. childhealthmapping.org.uk) found about half of the services to have specialist provision for intellectual disability but it is difficult to derive reassurance from figures that show the rate of increase of provision to have slowed and which give no real indication of the quality of the service. Today, it appears that these services have not yet lost their Cinderella status for they are still 6 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk Introduction far from routinely available across the UK and, moreover, future budgetary limitations are likely to lead to some retrenchment. Increasingly, services have become dedicated to the management of the young person in the home and at school. However, although the associated curtailment of NHS hospital resources has encouraged the retention of young people in their community, it also led to the development of other institutions, particularly in the independent sector. There is a shortage of in-patient places, 40% of which are provided by the private sector (O’Herlihy et al, 2001). Residential schools continue to flourish, some providing care for up to 52 weeks per year, but not always with good access to appropriate healthcare. The lack of clarity arising from the division of responsibilities between, for example, the home authority and the institution, has led to uncertainty and delay in the provision of mental health services for children in their care. Coupled with increased pressure on resources and greater concern about the legality of certain controls (e.g. the right to restrain or detain a child) and treatments (e.g. rectal medication), it has become more difficult for schools to keep certain children within their service. The steady progress towards inclusion reduced the number and size of specialised settings which had historically been able to cope with levels of aberrant behaviours that were beyond mainstream classes, which made for the more frequent use of exclusion and an increased demand on treatment services. Community services that had been based on special schools have had to extend and change their style to provide for a more diffusely scattered population. Until recently there had been little development of the specialised psychiatric services required for young people with intellectual disabilities, but in the past 6 years such services have been recognised as a component of a comprehensive CAMHS in England (Department of Health, 2004; 2008a) and Wales (Welsh Assembly Government, 2005) and have been the subject of a position statement by the Irish College of Psychiatrists (2004). In Scotland, a needs assessment report (Public Health Institute of Scotland, 2003) noted the gap in service provision for this group and although it remained unaddressed by the implementation document that followed (Scottish Executive Child Health Support Group, 2005) and excluded from the report on in-patient services (Scottish Executive Child Health Support Group, 2004), this is to be remedied by an appendix to the framework that is in preparation. These developments have to be seen within the wider range of services supporting mental health, which include education, Social Services and other agencies such as the employment support group Connexions, a whole range of tier 1 services (Committee of Inquiry into Meeting the Mental Health Needs of Young People with Learning Disabilities, 2002). The ‘Do Once and Share’ programme led to the development of a model care pathway (Pote & Goodban, 2007) and other publications which set out the practical details as to how the components of a service might operate (Bernard & Turk, 2009; Williams & Wright, 2010). Terminology Learning disability The departments of health of the UK adopted ‘learning disability’ as a term to identify the condition of ‘mental retardation’, the term used in ICD–10 Royal College of Psychiatrists 7 College Report CR163 (World Health Organization, 1992) and categorised as F70–F73. In Ireland, the Department of Health and Children suggested the use of the terms ‘intellectual disability’ for people with a moderate or more severe mental retardation and ‘learning difficulty’ for people with mild mental retardation (Department of Health, 1990). At about the same time, across the UK, the Department for Education adopted the term ‘learning difficulties’ in the Education Act 1993. The similarity of the terms has led to confusion, particularly as the same words are used to denote different categories of severity, the educational category of ‘moderate learning difficulties’ largely corresponding to the health categories of ‘mild’ or ‘borderline’ learning disabilities. This confusion is compounded as job descriptions, service specifications and academic publications use the terms ‘learning disabilities’ and ‘learning difficulties’ virtually synonymously, although it is important to recognise that the need for special educational provision reflects not just the individual’s cognitive ability but also their social and emotional competence. In health internationally, the term ‘intellectual disability’ is replacing all these terms, although the revision of ICD–10 may well bring further change. It should be appreciated that ‘developmental disability’ and ‘neurodevelopmental disability’ describe an overlapping but usually wider range of disability in which cognitive deficit is not necessarily present. This report uses the term ‘intellectual disability’ without intending it to have any theoretical or clinical significance, although it continues to use ‘learning disability’ where referring to particular specialties or services in the UK that retain that title. Whether a person is best dealt with by the learning disability service or mainstream CAMHS will depend on local commissioning. This should avoid arbitrary assignment by intellectual ability but should take into account the nature of the child and the disturbance that may be caused them as well as local resources and expertise. Children and adolescents In some services, ‘children and adolescents’ are defined by age, a cut-off point of 19 years often being used in line with education practice, or of 18 years in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Other services for young people use leaving school as a defining factor, an event that may occur as early as age 16 years, although there is the potential for further education. It is important not only that the cut-off points between various services are clearly defined but also that there should be some overlap in order to allow a degree of flexibility. It is essential that there is no gap in provision, particularly where services are not coterminous, and that all referring agencies are aware of the nature of provision and the referral procedures, including those in emergencies. People should have access to those services best able to meet their needs, rather than being subject to an arbitrary allocation based on an ‘exact’ IQ score or their birth date. Children and adolescents of all ages and levels of disability have very different needs that are best addressed from a developmental perspective. In this report we use the term ‘young people’, recognising that this includes a wide range of age and developmental stage and, consequently, of psychiatric disorder. 8 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk Introduction Psychiatric service The psychiatric service is delivered by a multidisciplinary (and sometimes multi-agency) team dealing with the assessment and management of psychiatric disorder – a term that includes a wide range of disturbance that may arise from mental illness, emotional problems or learnt maladaptive behaviour that may be considered to be ‘challenging behaviour’. The boundaries of the service are likely to depend on local agreements rather than any (national) concepts. Although the service would normally include a psychiatrist, he or she may not be involved with many of the children and carers that are being dealt with by the service. The service is only one of a range of other services involved in the promotion of mental health (Committee of Inquiry into Meeting the Mental Health Needs of Young People with Learning Disabilities, 2002) and it is essential that it be well integrated, a move that is likely to be encouraged by the development of multi-agency groups such as children’s trusts. Aims of services Prevention The prevention of intellectual disability itself is mainly the remit of other clinicians and scientists such as obstetricians, paediatricians and genetic counsellors, although psychiatric services have an important collaborative and supportive part to play in such work. More central to the role of the psychiatrist is the prevention and amelioration of the mental health problems associated with disability, and this requires work with both children and their families, as well as with other professionals involved in their care and education. Much will depend on the extent to which supportive services such as specialised teaching and training (in areas such as communication, relationships and the skills needed to lead a more independent and satisfying life) are accessible and appropriately funded. For example, in some areas teaching social skills, emotional literacy and emotional management (including relaxation training and anger management) might be more effectively done by schools and colleges than by mental health services. Programmes such as Portage (a home-visiting educational service for preschool children), Early Bird (supporting parents when their child is first diagnosed with an autism-spectrum disorder) and Hanen (teaching parents and children effective communication skills) can help parents as well as children in their adjustment to disability. Management Early diagnosis and assessment is essential, the latter including the interaction and needs of the whole family, not forgetting the siblings. Thereafter, many of the mental health problems of young people with intellectual disabilities follow a pattern of chronicity or frequent relapse, particularly at times of transition, for example on changing school or service. Often this means the long-term involvement of the psychiatric services with the young people and their families, both directly and by liaison with Royal College of Psychiatrists 9 College Report CR163 the wider, generic health, education and Social Services networks, to provide an integrated, multi-agency service. For some, it involves working in collaboration with a variety of residential facilities that includes schools, children’s homes and specialist units. Such service networks need to be comprehensive, catering for young people of all ages with all degrees and forms of disability, as well as to bridge the transition to adult services. How services are delivered will vary from place to place, depending on local resources, priorities and other service initiatives. This report outlines the important constituents that need to be available somewhere within the local service network. Service commissioners may need to approach both child psychiatrists and learning disability psychiatrists to ensure a comprehensive delivery, and there should be clearly defined care pathways. Services need to be both accessible and acceptable to families, who should always be consulted about treatment, which will often depend on their active participation. Some will need high levels of personal or material support to participate; all families need to have their social and cultural backgrounds taken into account, including language and culture as well as the effects of discrimination. These factors will add extra complexity, particularly with the involvement of others, such as interpreters, clerics, community workers and local leaders, and complicate issues such as the maintenance of confidentiality. The needs of children and their families lend a different emphasis to the character of the service compared with that for young people of normal ability. The more severe the intellectual disability, the more likely the work is to be behavioural and to be done through staff, family and carers, frequently at the school; differing perceptions and acceptance of disability underlies family work, where a frequent aim is simply to help the parents adopt a common perception, purpose and strategy. On the other hand, clinic work brings the benefits of greater privacy, although, whatever the setting, the psychiatrist is only one of the members of a community team. 10 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk The population and its needs Various research studies and service development projects have estimated that at least 2.5% of the general population in Great Britain has an intellectual disability of such severity that, at some point in their childhood, they will need specialist services (Emerson & Hatton, 2008). Within this group nearly 40% will experience significant psychiatric disorder compared with less than 10% of those of normal ability (Emerson, 2003a; Emerson & Hatton, 2007). A number of factors predispose areas to a higher prevalence of disability and disorder or to difficulties in service provision, including: socioeconomic deprivation inadequate supportive services poor educational provision a lack of local residential projects a remote rural population. Common Problems clinical problems of young people The full range of psychiatric disorders is seen in young people with intellectual disability. The problems are frequently long term and the response to treatment idiosyncratic because of the underlying neurological disorder. A number of other disabilities and disorders frequently occur in association with intellectual disability, including epilepsy, cerebral palsy and sensory impairments, as well as those characteristics peculiar to the underlying medical disorder (Dykens, 2000), and the potential impact of these needs to be understood. It is important to recognise that the presence of intellectual disability and other developmental disorders means that young people and their families may need to be seen over a longer period of time before change can be expected and that the life-long nature of those disorders contributes to high rates of re-referral. Consequently, there is a need for coordinated work with specialised health and educational services, Social Services, voluntary agencies and local parent groups. In addition, certain problems of such young people may require more specialised treatment. These include the conditions listed below. 1 Autism-spectrum and other pervasive developmental disorders are particularly frequent, lie behind many, if not most, of the problems of those referred to specialist CAMHS and pose a special challenge Royal College of Psychiatrists 11 College Report CR163 to the services. Given the nature, severity and impact of autism and its related disorders on young people, their families and carers, it is necessary that specialist expertise and support be available locally in order to facilitate the early diagnosis, development and integration of these young people. Here the service response should be determined by individual need and the suitability of local provision, rather than being based simply on an arbitrary measure of ability level (Le Couteur & Baird, 2003). The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the recognition, referral and diagnosis of autismspectrum disorders in children and young people are in preparation (http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG/Wave15/78). 2 Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a diagnosis that has to be made with regard to the child’s developmental level and, as yet, it is unclear in what respects the response to treatment differs from that of the normal population. 3 Emotional disorders are often overlooked as they frequently present in conjunction with a behavioural disorder, especially in services that historically have not been funded and staffed to meet such needs. 4 Behavioural disorder, frequently manifesting as aggression directed to others but also in the form of self-injury, is often the reason for referral. Commonly a reflection of limited communication, it may also be associated with physical disorder including everyday problems (such as earache, toothache and indigestion) as well as epilepsy or adverse effects of medication. Effective management of the physical challenges has often been impeded by doubt about the permissibility of particular forms of treatment, physical intervention or seclusion (Lyon & Pimor, 2004). 5 Disorders of sleep, eating and elimination are particularly common among young people with intellectual disabilities, and often are of a type not commonly found in other children (for example, pica). When severe, these can precipitate family breakdown. 6 Child abuse, including neglect, emotional and sexual abuse – children with intellectual disabilities are at greater risk of certain kinds of abuse than other children and both the abuse and its long-term effects often pass unrecognised (Allington-Smith et al, 2002; Sequeira & Hollins, 2003; Sequeira et al, 2003). 7 Offending and forensic psychiatric problems occur particularly in adolescence, and may also be secondary to any of the above. They are becoming the focus of their own specialist services. 8 Serious mental illnesses (including schizophrenia and affective disorders) do occur in young people with intellectual disabilities. However, assessment can be difficult partly because of the complexity of the presentation but also where the interpretation of symptoms is hindered by limited communication skills. The latter will interfere with the use of standard diagnostic criteria that depend on descriptions of specific experiences and feelings. Problems of families The impact of disability on families is variable but can be great and substantially affect family function. Alongside the child’s abnormal 12 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk The population and its needs development and behaviour, the family have to cope with lack of sleep, difficulties in finding appropriate strategies and in coming to terms with the diagnosis. Insecure attachment patterns may persist from infancy and adversely affect the development of personality so that complex relationship and adjustment problems are frequent and make the child’s disturbance worse (Fidler et al, 2000; Smith et al, 2001; Emerson, 2003b; Karola et al, 2010). Besides the environmental problems listed at the start of this section, the problems of the family can be compounded by the failure of services to take into account differences in cultural attitude to disability. Children and families can find themselves excluded from mainstream services because of their degree of intellectual disability, the unusual and violent nature of the behaviour or by the practical difficulties of accessing a traditional clinic. Diagnosis of intellectual disability The need for early intervention has been emphasised (Scottish Executive Child Health Support Group, 2005; Department of Health, 2008a), with early diagnosis an essential preliminary. The impact of disability is both immediate and long term and, rather than waiting until problems develop, there should be a pre-emptive link with services from the time the disability is identified. Whereas this is at a primary level, there should be ready involvement of more specialised services as occasion demands for an individual and their family. Early diagnosis of the intellectual disability and its consequences centres on the child development unit and potentially extends across a wide range of specialties, from developmental and community paediatrics to neurology, psychology, both clinical and educational, and clinical genetics. The frequency of delayed language development makes speech and language therapy an important element, especially where the services and assessments are in languages foreign to the family or the child. Older children, particularly those with less severe degrees of disability or recent immigrants, may be picked up by educational psychology and community child health services. Particular problems arise for those who are approaching the transition into adult services; they risk the deferment of action until they have left the young people’s service and then face further delay as they work their way up a new waiting list. Meeting health needs Psychiatric disturbance should be prevented as well as treated (Committee of Inquiry into Meeting the Mental Health Needs of Young People with Learning Disabilities, 2002), requiring adequate CAMHS with the full range of conventional psychiatric intervention strategies as well as taking account of particular needs such as those of young people from Black and minority ethnic backgrounds. It needs to be noted that there is very limited research to answer the demand for evidence-based treatments for these disorders whose response, like their presentation, is often atypical. However, specific outcome measures appropriate for children with intellectual disability and their families are being piloted by CAMHS Outcome Research Consortium (CORC). Royal College of Psychiatrists 13 College Report CR163 In addition to the competences required for mainstream child and adolescent psychiatry, particular expertise is required for: diagnosis and assessment counselling services other family work specialised individual therapies pharmacological therapy liaison and joint working with other agencies emergency cover the expert witness. Diagnosis and assessment Diagnosis is only one aspect of an assessment, which includes children’s general level of functioning within their social context, notably their family and school. Counselling services In addition to a range of multi-agency support, usually at tier 2 level, a family will often require specific counselling. Although initially this will be about the diagnosis and the outlook, further work is likely to be necessary from time to time throughout the family’s life, as new hurdles expose fresh issues for its members to cope with, particularly at times of transition (Bicknell, 1983). In addition, the young people themselves will be particularly vulnerable to adjustment problems as they come to recognise their limitations, particularly in contrast to their peers and siblings. Again, this work has to be closely linked to that of other services so that it includes liaison as well as direct clinical work. The growth of genetic diagnoses may give rise to emotional issues in families and take it beyond the competence of the genetic counselling services. Other family work The work, whether done by different members of the clinical team, often involves helping families understand their children’s behaviour, facilitating the development of parenting skills, enhancing family coping mechanisms and promoting appropriate play, occupation and communication. In addition to good teamwork, strong multi-agency relationships are required to ensure that the clinical input is coordinated effectively with other ongoing work, notably that done by social and educational services. Specialised individual therapies Certain forms of psychological therapy are of established use for young people with intellectual disabilities; these include a variety of behavioural and psychodynamic approaches and other focused forms of treatment. 14 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk The population and its needs Although the evidence base for mental health work with young people of normal ability usually can be assumed to be applicable to young people with intellectual disabilities, adaptations will be necessary, for example to cope with communication and conceptual difficulties. This work is often done in conjunction with the community team. Besides the supportive work described earlier, there is the need to focus on those individuals with the highest need and to work intensively with the child, family and school to overcome severe problems in the child’s behaviour. This may be part of the remit of a generic team or it may be done by a separate assertive outreach team whose members have the necessary expertise, experience and time. Pharmacological therapy In many of the conditions and situations described earlier (e.g. psychotic illness, affective disorders, ADHD and the psychiatric sequelae of epilepsy), drug treatments are of particular value. Children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities may have idiosyncratic responses to medication because of the complexity of their condition and they may experience difficulties in communication about adverse effects; consequently, the prescription and monitoring of psychotropic medication for this patient group requires specialist psychiatric advice (Bernard & Turk, 2009). Besides adverse effects, there is anxiety about the overuse of medication (a high level of prescribing is the hallmark of a lack of alternative resources). An increased level of investigation before starting a drug is recommended and there is uncertainty about the extent of monitoring required once it has been established. Despite the fact that shared-care contracts have been promoted, their acceptance by general practitioners (GPs) has been limited. Peer-group support and supervision is essential. Liaison and joint working with other agencies Partnership with other agencies is now seen as absolutely central to all CAMHS work not only at commissioning and service development but also at clinical levels. Liaison work should enable the smooth cooperation of the multiprofessional network so that parents are not faced with negotiating a maze of services but have a virtual front door into a comprehensive CAMHS (Department of Health, 2008a). Psychiatric work is delivered as part of a multidisciplinary, sometimes multi-agency, team. This can be a complex arrangement where the team has other roles including, for example, the provision of support at a primary level. Although there has been an expansion of services specific to young people, many community teams are still rooted in a lifespan service and also have to provide a service to adults; there even remain areas that have not developed multidisciplinary teams or formal provision for young people with an intellectual disability. Regardless of how it is provided, however, the psychiatric service must be closely coordinated with all of the following components. Other child health services, including generic child psychiatry, paediatrics, community child health (e.g. community paediatricians, school doctors, school nurses and community dentistry). Royal College of Psychiatrists 15 College Report CR163 Learning disability services and, in particular, health and local authority teams for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities – occu pational health and speech and language therapy may be part of one of these or fragmented across a variety of agencies and generic services. Educational services, including school staff and educational psychol ogists. As with many of the other agencies in this list, this involves discussion with people who may have an intimate knowledge of the young person and their family but are outside the boundary of the health service. There are therefore particular constraints on clinical confidentiality, although whether within or outside the health service, disclosure will be determined largely by the explicit agreement of patients and their families (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2006). Social Services – social workers and care workers as well as the variety of people who organise special aspects of care such as out-of-home placement. Employment support agencies such as Connexions. Services involved with offenders such as youth offending teams and youth justice teams. Voluntary agencies, including groups such as interpreters, religious groups and community workers, where these are relevant. Liaison is complex, the more so as many of the liaison personnel are part of wider, generic services that are not specific to disability or to young people. It is essential that resources are available for consultation with others, facilitating the access of these young people and their families to the generic services. The aim should be for the service to be accessible and useful to all cultural, social and ethnic groups. Close links may be encouraged by different structures including split posts, allowing one person to bridge two agencies or specialties. The transition to adult services has been a neglected area. Transition, intrinsic to normal development, is particularly stressful for this vulnerable group, the more so as they are often faced with multiple, concurrent transitions as they change school, Social Service support and psychiatrist, while losing key personnel such as the community paediatrician and school nurse. Uncertainty, helplessness and last-minute arrangements all increase the stress and can reverse the progress that has been made. Various agencies are seeking more effective management of the process (Department of Health, 2008b), but psychiatric services may be divided by differing perceptions of their remit with, for example, uncertainty as to the extent to which the developmental disorders should be dealt with by adult mental health services. Local transition pathways should be developed. Emergency cover There needs to be provision for 24-hour cover to respond to emergencies within the local catchment area. The expert witness The courts, both civil and criminal, require assistance in understanding and managing young people with intellectual disabilities. There is a shortage of 16 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk The population and its needs expertise in what has become an increasingly specialised area of work, which only a few psychiatrists are willing or equipped to undertake. Recognising that a service will be required to respond to judicial decisions, it needs to be clear as to the extent to which it will support this input into the process (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008). Academic work Teaching The staff involved in the care of children and adolescents with mental health problems and intellectual disabilities require access to appropriate education programmes. Mental health workers (including psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, nurses and other specialist therapists) have a particular role here in order to enhance mutual understanding and ease of cross-referral, and to indicate directions for future research. The effect of brain dysfunction and environmental factors and their interaction is at its most obvious in this area of psychiatry, making it an ideal teaching ground for both medical students and postgraduate trainees (Hollins & Bradley, 1987). Research and audit Many of the issues concerning the cause, nature and outcome of psychiatric problems in young people with intellectual disabilities are as yet poorly understood. The lack of evidence about the effectiveness of various treatment strategies in these young people means there is little guidance as to which treatment should be used with which child. There is an increasing pressure to show measurable outcomes. All this needs to be addressed urgently through research and audit and requires an academic infrastructure to be put in place. Continuing professional development The service requires psychiatrists with the necessary competences in a field that bridges both child psychiatry and learning disability psychiatry. Few psychiatrists are likely to enter with dual accreditation in these two specialties, so it is important that posts allow clinicians from the start to acquire the additional skills, knowledge and experience essential to clinical effectiveness. Because joint working with other disciplines and agencies is an integral element to this work, these specialist services can provide support, training and clinical experience for others if given the resources. Service development and planning Although there has been a significant expansion of services with the growth of comprehensive CAMHS, relatively few of those for young people with intellectual disabilities are well developed, many still being in an early stage or even stuck in a planning process. There continues to be a gap with the steady reduction of lifespan posts. It is difficult to quantify but the use of outof-area placements (whether educational or health) will give some indication of the success of the local service. Royal College of Psychiatrists 17 College Report CR163 The reconfiguration of health, social and educational services encourages evolution and it is essential that the multidisciplinary teams fulfilling this role be closely involved in service development programmes. However, as with their other activities, this requires sufficient time and resources. 18 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk Characteristics of a model service Local needs and resources will lead to variation in the constituents of particular services, but certain elements are common to all. Contracting for service Commissioners and health boards should identify what expertise is available locally and, through the process of contracting, ensure that there is clarity as to who is providing what. The expectation is that each area must provide a comprehensive CAMHS open to all children irrespective of ability. At least one appropriately trained psychiatrist should be identified within each district to provide an adequate service to young people with intellectual disabilities. Besides being closely integrated with other services for young people, the service should overlap other psychiatric services for adults, both those with and without intellectual disabilities, so that there are no gaps. Location Both local district-based services and the larger regional or teaching services may well contribute to this particular component of CAMHS. Using the Health and Social Care Advisory Service classification (Williams & Richardson, 1995), the lower tiers would be provided locally, as an integral part of the district’s overall community services, with contractual access to supra-district tier 4 services. Some contractual access to in-patient beds is essential and in order that those admitted can maintain contact with their own community, these beds should be distributed across the UK. Ideally, teams should have a common base, often in conjunction with CAMHS as part of a comprehensive service. Personnel The development of the National Service Framework (Department of Health, 2004) included an External Working Group for Young People with a Learning Disability. It recommended that a community team would comprise 5–6 whole-time equivalent (WTE) members for a population of 100 000. The exact composition is dependent on local preference but, as the work requires full, multidisciplinary mental health teamwork, the team should include psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, speech therapists and occupational therapists, while drawing on the wider CAMHS team for other specialist therapists (i.e. physiotherapists, music, art or play therapists). Adequate Royal College of Psychiatrists 19 College Report CR163 secretarial support is essential to the coherence of an effective community team as well as other managerial and back-up staff. Where there is a high density of a particular Black and minority ethnic group, the team might include bilingual workers or link workers, or have creative links with local voluntary agencies. All staff should have appropriate training and experience in working with young people whose mental health problems are complicated by intellectual disabilities (Mental Health Foundation Committee, 1997). For psychiatry, the Royal College of Psychiatrists suggests that a community service for young people with severe intellectual disabilities requires a minimum of two sessions of consultant clinical time per 100 000 total population, whereas the inclusion of young people with mild intellectual disabilities will require a further three clinical sessions; these sessions do not include time for administration and training. These levels reflect the demands of the high prevalence of pathological disorders, the community orientation of the work and the substantial amount of time spent in multidisciplinary and multi-agency liaison. To some extent the level of demand will depend on other local factors such as the social demographics, geography, the size and expertise of the community team and the extent to which general practice is prepared to take on continuing care and prescribing. Psychiatrists, whether they come from a background in child psychiatry or learning disability psychiatry, should have skills in working with young people with intellectual disabilities. Given the scarcity of supply relative to demand, it is likely that, once the role is taken on, the psychiatrist will need further training and experience as well as peer support and supervision. There should be provision for this in the post, including the allocation of additional time. The psychiatrist should be encouraged to link with wider groups such as the Child and Adolescent Learning Disability Psychiatry Network (CALDPN). In a similar vein, nurses may be drawn from various backgrounds, including mental health, intellectual disability and child health, the essential element being a willingness to work with children and their families as well as a flexible approach and an appreciation of the importance of other factors such as education, social support and housing. Communication is a key problem for many children and having a speech and language therapist on the team is highly advantageous. In addition to working with the young person and their family, this team member can liaise with their school-based colleagues. There is growing enthusiasm for interventions based on sensory integration usually provided by a suitably trained occupational therapist. Although acknowledging a lack of evidence of effectiveness to date, many services have found sensory integration interventions to be invaluable. An in-patient unit requires about one WTE consultant for 12 beds, taking into account the significant need for work in the community before admission and, more extensively, around the time of discharge, often at some geographical distance. Despite the fact that the turnover in a secure unit may be less than in an open unit, the demands of the legal framework are substantially greater so that the requirement for consultant time is no less. Material resources Although much of the work is done in the community, community services need access to the same resources as the rest of CAMHS. 20 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk Characteristics of a model service Community and outreach services Repeated appointments in standard working hours at a clinic are often beyond the means of a working family already struggling to cope with the many commitments that can come with a child with a disability. The delivery of community services means substantial flexibility to allow the great variety of out-patient and community activities in conjunction with the other staff and agencies to be accessible to the young person and their families, whether at school or in the home and at an appropriate time. It entails both the means and time to travel, which should be reflected in the budgeted levels of activity. Besides individual work, the development of specialist teams should be encouraged. Such teams, given the flexibility and time, may replace admissions to a residential unit and be more effective at giving the family the confidence that it can cope with its problems. (This will not be appropriate for every case as it is an approach that may be precluded by home circumstances, such as the needs of other siblings or the mental health of a parent, so that an out-of-home placement will still be required occasionally.) Services should reflect the cultural, ethnic and religious diversity of society and take account of the different patterns of family life. In-patient facilities Some young people, even with good community support, cannot be managed safely or effectively at home but require an out-of-home placement. A substantial amount of the psychiatrist’s work will be in collaboration with foster homes, children’s homes and residential schools (Berney, 2009), as well as with general child and adolescent in-patient services (the complexity and size of the workload will depend on the familiarity of the placement staff with the disabilities involved). However, there are some young people whose behaviour is such that they cannot be safely or adequately treated other than in specialist in-patient facilities comparable to those available to young people without disabilities (O’Herlihy et al, 2001). These will allow the assessment and diagnosis, as well as both short- and mediumterm treatment, of complex, difficult cases in a setting that provides developmentally appropriate care. These facilities need to be able to cope with the high levels of aggression that can occur in this group of users. The number of beds required will vary depending on the community service and its level of resources, as well as on what is provided by local education services, Social Services and other health facilities (such as short break facilities for young people with challenging behaviour) (Smith & Berney, 2006). A total population of 1 million requires about 3–4 beds for young people with severe intellectual disabilities, 2–3 beds for those with mild intellectual disabilities and 1 bed for those who require low secure provision. The last has to provide separately for those who require security because of the intensity of their disturbance and for those who are offenders so that it may be at a supra-regional level that is distinct from the national need for medium secure beds. Services need to ensure that there is access to provision for the full range of young people and their needs. They should provide for both mild and more severe degrees of disability, for children and adolescents, emergency as well as planned admissions, formal detention under the Mental Royal College of Psychiatrists 21 College Report CR163 Health Act 1983 and for offenders. Young people with autism-spectrum disorders or violent behaviour may require higher staffing ratios than those in most other psychiatric units, as well as a robust and well-structured physical environment that meets their particular needs. In-patient resources complement (rather than replace) the community approach for young people. Outreach work can shorten or even eliminate admission. The need for this as well as for out-patient work must be recognised and budgeted for as a part of any admission. Commissioners should ensure that the beds they commission meet their need, with clear operational policies for the process. These should include well-defined protocols and criteria for admission with provision for a thorough, preadmission community assessment. If the disruption and duration of admission is to be minimised, there has to be close liaison between the in-patient service and the local team. Commissioners should expect good links with community services and a clear, integrated pathway of care that includes a plan for discharge. This is hard to achieve if the in-patient unit is geographically distant from the in-patient service. Each region should have access to appropriate beds, if only to ensure that young people maintain their contact with their families and community services. Evaluation Specialised services risk isolation. Individual professionals find themselves losing contact with peers, whose clinical work can be so different, and teams, whether in-patient or community, can develop an introverted culture that loses sight of changing practice in their field. Such professional and personal isolation brings idiosyncratic and sometimes dangerous practices and is fertile ground for the growth of difficult relationships with others. It is essential, therefore, to build into any service mechanisms to support the habit of examining its practice, comparing itself with others and developing a social network. Its aims should include the encouragement of professional development and, in identifying innovative clinical practice, to build on it or discourage it depending on its merits. There are two systems that have been developed specifically to address this, both developing standards by self-review and external peer review as well as providing the means for services to compare their performance with others. Developed for mainstream CAMHS but with a specific subsection on child learning disability services, the Quality Improvement Network for Multiagency CAMHS (QINMAC) is aimed at community work. The counterpart for in-patient services is the Quality Network for Inpatient CAMHS (QNIC). These not only provide the means of evaluation but also encourage professional and social networking. The service must be acceptable to young people and their families and have commitment to seeking and acting on user and carer feedback (Department for Children Schools and Families, 2008). Besides formal measures, such feedback may be obtained informally through clinical work, parent support groups and other professionals. 22 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk References Allington-Smith, P., Ball, R. & Haytor, R. (2002) Management of sexually abused children with learning disabilities. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8, 66–72. Bernard, S. & Turk, J. (eds) (2009) Developing Mental Health Services for Children and Adolescents with Learning Disabilities: A Toolkit for Clinicians. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Berney, T. P. (2009) The management of emotional and behavioural problems. In Disabled Children Living Away from Home (ed C. Burns). McKeith Press. Bicknell, J. (1983) The psychopathology of handicap. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 56, 167–178. Committee of Inquiry into Meeting the Mental Health Needs of Young People with Learning Disabilities (2002) Count Us In. Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities & Mental Health Foundation. Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008) Aiming High for Disabled Children (AHDC) Core Offer. Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2008. Department of Health (1990) Needs and Abilities: A Policy for the Intellectually Disabled. Report of a Review Group on Mentally Handicap Services. TSO (The Stationery Office), Government of Ireland. Department of Health (2004) National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services: The Mental Health and Psychological Well-Being of Children and Young People. Department of Health. Department of Health (2008a) Children and Young People in Mind: The Final Report of the National CAMHS Review. Department of Health. Department of Health (2008b) Transition: Moving on Well. Department of Health. Dykens, E. M. (2000) Psychopathology in children with intellectual disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 407–417. Emerson, E. (2003a) Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 51–58. Emerson, E. (2003b) Mothers of children and adolescents with intellectual disability: social and economic situation, mental health status, and the self-assessed social and psychological impact of the child’s difficulties. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 385–399. Emerson, E. & Hatton, C. (2007) Mental health of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities in Britain. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 493–499 . Emerson, E. & Hatton, C. (2008) People with Learning Disabilities in England. Centre for Disability Research, Lancaster University (http://www.lancs.ac.uk/staff/emersone/ FASSWeb/Emerson_08_PWLDinEngland.pdf). Fidler, D. J., Hodapp, R. M. & Dykens, E. M. (2000) Stress in families of young children with Down syndrome, Williams syndrome, and Smith-Magenis syndrome. Early Education and Development, 11, 395–406. Hollins, S. & Bradley, E. (1987) Mental handicap in context: medical undergraduate education. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 11, 389–391. Irish College of Psychiatrists (2004) Position Statement on Psychiatric Services for Children and Adolescents. Irish College of Psychiatrists. Royal College of Psychiatrists 23 College Report CR163 Karola, D., Mickey, K., Alvin, D., et al (2010) Living with children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder: parental and professional views. British Journal of Special Education, 37, 13–23. Le Couteur, A. & Baird, G. (2003) National Autism Plan for Children (NAPC). National Autistic Society. Lyon, C. & Pimor, A. (2004) Physical Interventions and the Law: Legal Issues Arising From the Use of Physical Interventions in Supporting Children, Young People and Adults with Learning Disabilities and Severe Challenging Behaviour. BILD. Mental Health Foundation Committee (1997) Don’t Forget Us: Children with Learning Disabilities and Severe Challenging Behaviour. Mental Health Foundation. O’Herlihy, A., Worrall, A., Banerjee, S., et al (2001) National In-patient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Study (NICAPS). Royal College of Psychiatrists. Pote, H. & Goodban, D. (eds) (2007) A Mental Health Care Pathway for Children and Young People with Learning Disabilities. CAMHS Publications: University College London & Anna Freud Centre. Public Health Institute of Scotland (2003) Needs Assessment Report on Child and Adolescent Mental Health: Final Report. Public Health Institute of Scotland. Royal College of Psychiatrists (2004) Psychiatric Services for Children and Adolescents with Learning Disabilities (Council Report CR123). Royal College of Psychiatrists. Royal College of Psychiatrists (2006) Good Psychiatric Practice: Confidentiality and Information Sharing (Council Report CR133). Royal College of Psychiatrists. Royal College of Psychiatrists (2008) Court Work (College Report CR147). Royal College of Psychiatrists. Scottish Executive Child Health Support Group (2004) Inpatient Working Group – Psychiatric Inpatient Services for Children and Young People in Scotland: A Way Forward. Scottish Executive. Scottish Executive Child Health Support Group (2005) Children and Young People’s Mental Health: A Framework for Promotion, Prevention and Care. Scottish Executive. Sequeira, H. & Hollins, S. (2003) Clinical effects of sexual abuse on people with learning disability. Critical literature review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 13–19. Sequeira, H., Howlin, P. & Hollins, S. (2003) Psychological disturbance associated with sexual abuse in people with learning disabilities. Case–control study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 451–456. Smith, P. & Berney, T. P. (2006) Psychiatric inpatient units for children and adolescents with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 608–614. Smith, T., Oliver, M. & Innocenti, M. (2001) Parenting stress in families of children with disabilities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71, 257–261. Welsh Assembly Government (2005) National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services in Wales. Welsh Assembly Government. Williams, C. & Wright, B. (2010) Learning disability services. In Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: An Operational Handbook (2nd edn) (eds G. Richardson, I. Partridge & J. Barrett), pp. 169–181. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Williams, R. & Richardson, G. (1995) Together We Stand: The Commissioning Role and Management of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. HMSO. World Health Organization (1992) The ICD–10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. WHO. 24 http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk CR161 Revalidation and guidance for psychiatrists August 2010 © 2010 Royal College of Psychiatrists College Reports have been approved by a meeting of the Central Policy Coordination Committee and constitute official College policy until they are revised or withdrawn. They are given blue covers and are numbered CR1, CR2, etc. The Royal College of Psychiatrists is a charity registered in England and Wales (228636) and in Scotland (SC038369). COLLEGE REPORT
© Copyright 2024