Disruptive Classroom Behavior in an Amish School-Aged Child With Muscular Dystrophy Pediatrics 2004;114;1501 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1721U The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/114/Supplement_6/1501.full.html PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275. Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 Disruptive Classroom Behavior in an Amish School-Aged Child With Muscular Dystrophy* CASE Will is an Amish school-aged boy with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). After reading about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the local newspaper, his mother asked Will’s pediatrician, “Do you think my son has this (condition)?” She noted that Will fidgets in different settings and has difficulty focusing on his work when in school. She also reported that his teacher in the Amish school does not want him in her classroom because he is disruptive and noncompliant. The teacher tried incentives to encourage Will to complete his schoolwork but without success. Subsequently, his teacher prevented Will from participating in recess activities; at other times, she sent him home as punishment for noncompliance in the classroom. During the past week, Will did not attend school while his teacher sent assignments home with his sister. Will’s mother reported that he seemed to be happy, with a normal appetite and sleep pattern. She was not aware of any behavior problems with other children. Will’s father, who also attended the pediatric appointment, added that he did not feel that the teacher was patient with Will. He stated that Will has friends but may have a difficult time keeping up with them due to his physical weakness secondary to muscular dystrophy. He also believed that due to motor limitations, writing was difficult for Will. The parents did not provide consequences for Will’s insistence on not attending school nor did they positively reward him for school attendance. When at home, Will did his work and kept to himself. Will was quiet and motionless in his seat. He stated that he liked school and playing with friends and that the schoolwork was not too difficult. INDEX TERMS. Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Amish culture, learning disability. Dr Martin T. Stein The clinical information available on this schoolaged boy with muscular dystrophy is sparse. However, there is a sufficient medical and social history to suggest several directions for further investigation. A medical understanding of the natural history of DMD and the effect it has on motor and cognitive development only begins the process of inquiry. Will’s pediatrician must use her knowledge of cultural values and educational expectations in the * Originally published in J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2004;25:280 –284. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1721U PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Amish community in order to communicate effectively with Will, his parents, and teacher. The commentaries highlight the importance of incorporating a cultural, psychological, and educational focus during the evaluation process. The patient, family, school, and extended community are individual components of Will’s life; to provide a therapeutic intervention, each component must be addressed. Dr Lee Pachter is Professor of Pediatrics and Anthropology at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, where he directs the Division of General Pediatrics. Dr Pachter’s education in anthropology and pediatrics is highlighted in his commentary, where he explores the unique characteristics of the Amish culture and their impact on educational and family values. Lisa Schwartz, a doctoral student in clinical psychology at Case Western Reserve University, writes about the importance of a comprehensive psychosocial evaluation that moves beyond the initial concern with ADHD. Dr Howard Taras is Professor of Pediatrics at the University of California, San Diego, where he is Acting Director of the Division of Community Pediatrics. Dr Taras is a medical consultant for several school districts and Chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on School Health. His commentary addresses medical, behavioral, legal, and cultural aspects of the case. Martin T. Stein, MD Professor of Pediatrics University of California Children’s Hospital San Diego San Diego, California Dr Lee M. Pachter This case brings up many interesting issues with regard to child behavior and the importance of context (or setting). There are various contexts that pertain to this particular case, including culture, the educational system, community, chronic illness, and child development. The Amish are a religious and cultural group that stems from the Anabaptist movement in Europe in the 1500s and 1600s. Amish society is based on simple (plain) living and a literal interpretation of the Bible.1 Most Amish communities are agricultural and based around family farms. The pace of life is guided by the belief that modernity, in the form of high technology, is unnecessary for leading a good and pious life. Most traditional (Old Order) Amish do not own cars or have electricity on their farms and homes (generators are common, though). Motorpowered farm equipment is often used— but drawn behind a horse. “It’s not the technology that we are against,” said one farmer, “but the pace of life that PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 5 November 2004 Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 1501 often goes with the technology.” Although change— in the form of acculturation— does occur, the centrality of maintaining a simple life based on tradition does not allow for much variation within the community. There are numerous sects or orders of Amish, each with differing perspectives on what is acceptable with regard to use of modern technology. Children are socialized to value community strength and cohesion. Individual advancement and mobility are not highly regarded normative values in traditional Amish society. Children are taught to be obedient, well-mannered, quiet, and humble. Parents are responsible for their children’s behavior. Traditional Amish children are educated in schools in the community. Formal education ends at the 8th grade. In 1972, the Supreme Court exempted Old Order Amish from compulsory education past this grade. The traditional Amish school is the 1-room schoolhouse in which all children are taught in the same space by a single teacher.2 Socialization with children of different ages is the typical pattern in most Amish schools. The teacher rotates time, actively teaching with each grade while the other grades do readings and textbook exercises. The teacher often instructs the older students, who then work with the younger students. This further enhances the socially normative value of interdependence, group cohesion, and community. The social context of growth and development in childhood is considerably different compared to typical mainstream (what the Amish call “English”) settings. A behavior considered normal in a mainstream family and school setting may be perceived differently in the traditional Amish context described above. A child whose behaviors are interpreted as being “disruptive” and “noncompliant” not only harms his/her own reputation but also may be seen as problematic in the social environment of a 1-room schoolhouse that requires interpersonal cooperation as well as self-management skills. Also, perceived deviant behavior may be seen as a stain on the parent’s reputation. Will’s behaviors are likely related to his muscular dystrophy. Symptoms often become more pronounced at this age, and depression may accompany the loss of motor skills and independence. Also, intellectual impairment may become pronounced at this age. He may eventually require individualized educational resources. At first, I thought that if ever there was a poor “goodness of fit” between child and environment, here it is! Will is a child with increasing special needs in a community that values simplicity and conformity. He lives in a community where the educational expectations include attention, self-motivation, and discipline, especially challenging for a child with possible depression and mental impairment. The limited capacity of the local school system for the provision of specialized services or an individualized educational plan is an additional barrier. However, after thinking about this for a while, I began to see that this setting might have some particular advantages. Will lives in a community that takes direct responsibility for its members. As an example, many self-employed Amish do not partic1502 ipate in Social Security since they feel that it is the responsibility of the community, not the government, to take care of its own members. The closeness of relationships inherent in a small community and a 1-room schoolhouse could provide Will with the strong social support system he will need as his disease progresses. Perhaps he will require more 1-on-1 teaching and individual attention, which might be possible in a 1-room schoolhouse by assigning an older student as a tutor. The pediatrician can provide information and guidance to the parents, teacher, and community. An understanding that Will’s behaviors are not due to an inherent “stubbornness,” nonconformity, or individualism (all stigmatized behaviors) but are a result of his medical condition will be useful. When framed in this way, I suspect that there will be greater tolerance for other behavioral and educational issues that may develop and a greater effort to do whatever possible to help this child successfully fit into the social and educational environment. A health-beliefs history will facilitate the pediatrician’s understanding about which issues are particularly concerning to the family, as the parents reveal their beliefs regarding causes and meanings of the issues from their perspective.3 The role of Will’s pediatrician in explaining the connection between the behaviors and the chronic illness, and in negotiating potential solutions, is crucial. Lee M. Pachter, DO Professor of Pediatrics and Anthropology University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington, Connecticut REFERENCES 1. Hostetler JA. Amish Society. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1993 2. Hostetler JA, GE Huntington. Children in Amish Society: Socialization and Community Education. New York, NY: Holt, Rinheart and Winston; 1971 3. Pachter LM. Ethnic and cultural influence on child health and health services. In: Green M, Haggerty RJ, Weitzman M, eds. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders; 1999:105–109 Lisa Schwartz Pediatricians frequently are asked to evaluate children for ADHD when parents or teachers report symptoms of hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattention. This is a unique case in that the child has muscular dystrophy and lives in an Amish community. Following Will’s initial visit to a referral clinic, consultation with the teacher was challenging in that Will attended an Amish school without a phone. Will’s mother was asked to have the teacher call the clinic in order to discuss Will’s classroom behaviors. The teacher’s observations were consistent with the behaviors reported by Will’s mother. The teacher added that he does well in school when he is able to complete his work. However, the young Amish teacher was unfamiliar with the symptoms of ADHD and could not provide insight into the reason for Will’s symptoms. When presented with a child who is disruptive, hyperactive, and not completing schoolwork, the assessment should include depression, anxiety, and a cognitive deficiency. Will’s parents were hesitant DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN AN AMISH SCHOOL-AGED CHILD WITH DMD Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 and uncomfortable when the possibility of a psychological problem was raised. The stigma of mental illness, common among some Amish individuals, may have hindered the teacher’s ability to assess Will’s symptoms.1 Although his mother seemed to accept a diagnosis of ADHD, which she perceived to be a medical diagnosis associated with a pharmacological treatment, both parents were uncomfortable with the standardized behavioral questionnaires to assess psychological symptoms. Will’s physical limitations associated with muscular dystrophy may have contributed to some of his symptoms. As his father observed, the progressive nature of the disease limited Will’s ability to physically keep up with his peers and to write his assignments. The teacher’s punishment for his behaviors, taking away recess time, and sending him home, reinforced the notion that he is no longer able to participate in peer and academic activities. It did not leave room for an alternative contingency management program. With an emerging realization of his physical limitations, feelings of sadness and withdrawal may have led to Will’s inattentive behavior and lack of interest in school.2 In addition, DMD is associated with cognitive impairments that may account for some of Will’s symptoms at school.3 However, considering the teacher’s report of Will’s academic achievement when he does complete assignments, it is unlikely that he has a significant cognitive deficiency. It is more likely that Will’s current symptoms can be attributed to a new awareness of his condition and the limitations related to it. He is at an age when physical limitations in children with DMD are likely to occur4 and may be associated with difficulties with peer and academic activities. In this context, it is not surprising that he has become withdrawn and unmotivated about participation in peer and academic activities at school. Will may have a secondary gain from his inattentive and noncompliant behavior at school; loss of recess privileges and being sent home removed him from the school environment. Furthermore, without appropriate reinforcement for his behaviors (eg, lack of rewards for school attendance and punishment for misbehaving in school), Will currently has no motivation to change his behavior. Effective intervention should be focused on educating the parents and teacher about the potential psychological, physical, and cognitive manifestations of muscular dystrophy and the importance of participating in normal childhood activities (eg, school and peer play) consistent with his abilities. Will’s parents and teacher can provide reinforcement for school attendance and attentive and compliant behaviors at school. The teacher also can offer appropriate reinforcements for Will’s behaviors that do not involve removing him from academic or peer activities. Finally, in the context of an Amish family culture, Will’s parents may not be comfortable with or have access to psychosocial services.1,5 Potential barriers to psychosocial services should be discussed with the parents. Helping them to understand their son’s behaviors in the context of the muscular dystrophy and potential benefits from counseling may be helpful. Identification of culturally sensitive psychosocial services close to their Amish community should be a priority for the clinician and family. Lisa Schwartz, MA Department of Psychology Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio REFERENCES 1. Cates JA, Graham LL. Psychological assessment of the older order Amish: unraveling the enigma. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2002;33:155–161 2. Thompson RJ, Zeman JL, Fanurik D, Sirotkin-Roses M. The role of parent stress and coping and family functioning in parent and child adjustment to Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Clin Psychol. 1992;48:11–19 3. Wicksell RK, Kihlgren M, Melin L, Eeg-Olofsson O. Specific cognitive deficits are common in children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:154 –159 4. Warschausky S, Kewman DG, Bradley A, Dixon P. Pediatric neurological conditions: brain and spinal cord injury and muscular dystrophy. In: Roberts MC, ed. Handbook of Pediatric Psychology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2003:375–391 5. Greska LP, Korbin JE. Amish. In: Ember CR, Ember M, eds. Encyclopedia of Medical Anthropology. Vol. 2: Cultures. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press; 2004:557–564 Dr Howard Taras There are a number of issues to consider related to how physicians communicate with their patients’ schools. Figuratively, a “triangle of communication” exists for school-age health problems. A parent, a physician, and a school representative comprise 3 corners of the triangle, and the child is in the center. Reasons for the line of communication between physician and school to be the weakest are: (a) schools without nurses often have no designated health representative, (b) teachers rarely feel comfortable telephoning doctors, (c) confidentiality concerns inhibit communication, (d) physicians have neither time nor reimbursement to attend school meetings, (e) primary care doctors’ offices are not organized to return calls at precisely the time when teachers are available to receive them, and (f) physicians not familiar with the legal rights of students may restrict effective advocacy. Only informed, intelligent, assertive, objective, and highly verbal parents can mitigate the need for direct doctor-school communication. I will address this boy’s circumstances through this lens of communication with schools. Medical. As a child with DMD enters third grade, he may begin to experience fine and gross motor problems that are debilitating enough to interfere with class work but not yet obvious to school staff. Even if his doctor educated Will’s 2nd grade teacher last year, it would be erroneous to assume that the school retained this knowledge. Physicians should coordinate with parents to update schools annually and whenever the medical condition changes. I recommend sending to the school a 1-page description (using nonmedical terms) of a chronic disease that may affect academic performance and behavior in school and request that the correspondence become part of the student’s permanent record. Annually request parents of school-aged patients to complete a form that permits you to interact with the child’s school on health matters. There is a standard form Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 SUPPLEMENT 1503 that is specific to school-related communication and complies with federal regulations on exchange of information (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act).1 Behavioral. ADHD does not sound likely here. Maladaptation to stress of a progressive muscular disorder is a more likely diagnosis. Schoolteachers need to know that neurobehavioral changes are a part of the phenotype of DMD. Decreased social awareness, affective problems (eg, labile mood, depression, and anxiety), social isolation, aggression, and impairment in some memory functions have been documented.2–4 Legal. Ideally, a school’s awareness of health and neurobehavioral problems will lead to further school investigation and accommodations. The teacher’s observations of Will’s behavior combined with her knowledge of the disease should have led to a special education evaluation that included physical therapy and occupational therapy assessments and targeted psychological testing. The federal law known as the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act should be in place to establish an individualized educational program.5 Misbehavior, when attributable to a disability, prohibits use of punishment as a response (although behavioral therapeutic responses are permitted as long as this is written into the individualized educational program). If Will’s level of achievement is not significantly different from his intellectual ability to qualify him for special education, then the Rehabilitation Act (Section 504) guarantees that reasonable accommodations will be made.6 Examples might be more time to write assignments and individualized instructions on school work in a manner that accommodates his potential memory deficits. Most clinicians would be able to advocate to this point, but it sounds as if this child attends a private, Amish school. Schools that do not receive public funds are not required to perform evaluations for special education or to offer special education programs. Private religious schools are exempt from even more basic accommodations (like building a ramp for a child with a wheel chair or granting untimed testing). The public school district nearest Will’s community is responsible for his special education evaluation and providing some services. However, not all these services must be provided at the site of his Amish school. Cultural. Will’s family and teacher are Amish. They belong to a culture that emphasizes that all children must be taught personal responsibility and accountability— highlighting the needs of the group rather than of the individual.7 Will’s physician should explore whether Will’s educational needs are being subjugated for the greater good of the classroom and, if so, work within the Amish culture and community to modify how his needs can be met in the cultural milieu of that school. Howard Taras, MD Professor of Pediatrics University of California Medical Director of Physician Consultation to San Diego School Districts San Diego, California 1504 REFERENCES 1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act form for communication with schools. Available at: www.schoolhealth.org. Accessed May 16, 2004 2. Hinton VJ, De Vivo DC, Nereo NE, Goldstein E, Stern Y. Selective deficits in verbal working memory associated with a known genetic etiology: the neuropsychological profile of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001;7:45–54 3. Roccella M, Pace R, De Gregorio MT. Psychopathological assessment in children affected by Duchenne de Boulogne muscular dystrophy. Minerva Pediatr. 2003;55:267–273, 273–276 4. Hinton VJ, De Vivo DC, Nereo NE, Goldstein E, Stern Y. Poor verbal working memory across intellectual level in boys with Duchenne dystrophy. Neurology. 2000;54:2127–2132 5. Altshuler SJ, Kopels S. Advocating in schools for children with disabilities: what’s new with IDEA? Soc Work. 2003;48:320 –329 6. Betz CL. Use of 504 plans for children and youth with disabilities: nursing application. Pediatr Nurs. 2001;27:347–352 7. McGonigal K. Durkheimian explanations of key aspects of Amish culture. 2001. Available at: www.missouri.edu/⬃rsocjoel/rs150/papers/ endpaper.html. Accessed May 16, 2004 Dr Martin T. Stein DMD was described in 1868 by a French neurologist as a muscular paralysis associated with muscle hypertrophy and accumulation of large amounts of fat and connective tissue in muscle. The X-linked pattern of inheritance has been known for over a century. A mutation in the translation of the gene on the X chromosome that controls the synthesis of the muscle protein, dystrophin, was discovered in 1986. Dystrophin is found in concentrations less than 3% of normal in muscle biopsies of children with DMD. A dystrophin deficiency is associated with a membrane defect that allows leakage of cytoplasmic components such as creatine kinase and influx of excessive calcium. An excess of intracellular calcium causes the muscle necrosis in patients with DMD. The serum creatine phosphokinase is elevated at birth and during the preclinical phase of disease.1 DMD is a hereditary myopathy associated with progressive weakness. Most patients are apparent to clinicians by 3 to 4 years old with delayed walking (half of patients) or an abnormal gait in association with a markedly elevated level of serum creatine phosphokinase. Weakness of the gluteal and hip extensor muscles cause a waddling gait and a compensatory exaggeration of lumbar lordosis. Proximal arm weakness appears later. Although the rate of progression varies, by 13 years of age all patients have lost the ability to walk and use a wheel chair. Kyphoscoliosis and weakness of respiratory muscles are associated with recurrent pulmonary infections and the most patients die before 20 years of age; 25% of patients with DMD live beyond 21 years of age. Cognitive deficiency is common in children with DMD. Approximately 30% of patients have some degree of mental retardation with the range of intelligent quotient between 46 and 134. Many patients with average or above-average cognitive abilities have deficits in immediate memory, verbal learning, abstract concept formation, and flexibility. The brains of patients with DMD demonstrate variable alterations including pachygyria (widened gyri and decreased number of sulci), a low brain weight, and heterotopias (abnormal neuronal migration). Knowledge about the inheritance, progressive DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN AN AMISH SCHOOL-AGED CHILD WITH DMD Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 weakness, and potential cognitive deficiency in children and adolescents with DMD is critical to the provision of comprehensive care for Will, his parents, and his extended community. It guides a pediatrician’s recommendations about predictable changes in physical activity, respiratory care, and ongoing educational needs. Patients with DMD benefit from a comprehensive care team including a neurologist, orthopedic surgeon, physical and occupational therapists, and a mental health professional. Although Will’s father demonstrated some understanding of the disorder, further education might enhance the family’s adaptive strategies at home and their communication with the school. Education of parents and patients must be ongoing and responsive to changes in developmental maturation. Are there other children in Will’s family? What is his mother’s understanding of the condition? Will a consultation visit with a genetic counselor be useful? How will genetic counseling be perceived in the Amish culture? Is Will’s experience of increasing weakness and limitation of activities associated with feelings of depression? His pediatrician is in a position to explore these issues, educate, guide, refer when appropriate, and treat intercurrent problems at an early stage. In addition, this case highlights the importance of close attention to cultural variations and determinants that may impact on the explanatory model of illness as perceived by the family and community. REFERENCE 1. Smith SA, Swaiman KF. Muscular dystrophies. In: Swaiman KF, Ashwal SA. Pediatric Neurology: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1999:1235–1242 Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014 SUPPLEMENT 1505 Disruptive Classroom Behavior in an Amish School-Aged Child With Muscular Dystrophy Pediatrics 2004;114;1501 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-1721U Updated Information & Services including high resolution figures, can be found at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/114/Supplement _6/1501.full.html References This article cites 9 articles, 1 of which can be accessed free at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/114/Supplement _6/1501.full.html#ref-list-1 Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the following collection(s): Development/Behavioral Issues http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/developme nt:behavioral_issues_sub Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xht ml Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275. Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org by guest on August 22, 2014
© Copyright 2024