Approximate Solution of Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Wave Equation by Optimal Homotopy Asymptotic Method H. Ullah1, S. Islam1, I. Khan2, L. C. C. Dennis3, M. Fiza1 1 Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, 23200 Pakistan. 2 College of Engineering Majmaah University, Majmaah Saudi Arabia 3 Department of Fundamental Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS 31750 Perak Malaysia Abstract In this article, the two dimensional nonlinear wave equations are considered. Solution to the problem is approximated by using Optimal Homotopy Asymptotic Method (OHAM). The residual and convergence of the proposed method to nonlinear wave equation is presented through graphs. The resultant analytic series solution of the two dimensional nonlinear wave equation shows the effectiveness of the proposed method. The comparison of results has been made with the existing results available in the literature. Keywords: OHAM, two-dimensional wave equation, Residual Estimate. 1. Introduction The wave equations play a vital role in diverse areas of engineering, physics and scientific applications. An enormous amount of research work is already available in the study of wave equations [1-2]. This article deal with the two-dimensional nonlinear wave equation of the form ∂ 2u ( x , t ) ∂ 2 u ( x, t ) x2 + t 2 − u x , t = 1 − , 0 ≤ x, t ≤ 1 (1) ( ) ∂t 2 ∂x 2 2 The differential equations (DEs) can be solved analytically by a number of perturbation techniques [3-4]. These techniques are fairly simple in calculating the solutions, but their limitations are based on the assumption of small parameters. Therefore, the researchers are on the go for some new techniques to overcome these limitations. The idea of homotopy was pooled with perturbation. Liao [5] proposed Homotopy Analysis Method (HAM) in his PhD dissertation and applied it to various nonlinear engineering problems [6-8] . The Homotopy Perturbation Method (HPM) was initially introduced by He [9-13]. HPM has been extensively used by several researchers successfully for physical models [14-16]. Some useful comparisons between HAM and HPM were done by Domiarrry and Liang [17-18]. Recently Marinca and Herisanu [19-21] introduced OHAM for the solution of nonlinear problems which made the perturbation methods independent of the assumption of small parameters, Ullah et al. [22-26] have extended and applied OHAM successfully for numerous nonlinear phenomena. 1 The motive of this paper is to apply OHAM for the solution of two-dimensional nonlinear wave equations. In [19-21] OHAM has been proved to be useful for obtaining an approximate solution of nonlinear differential equations. Here, we have proved that OHAM is more useful and reliable for the solution of two-dimensional nonlinear wave equations; hence, showing its validity and greater potential for the solution of transient physical phenomenon in Science and Engineering. Section 2 has the basic idea of OHAM formulated for the solution of partial differential equations. In Section 3, the effectiveness of OHAM for two-dimensional nonlinear wave equation has been studied. 2. Basic Formulation of OHAM Consider the partial differential equation of the following form: A ( u ( x , t ) ) + f ( x , t ) = 0, x∈Ω (2) B ( u, ∂u / ∂x ) = 0, x∈Γ (3) Where A is a differential operator, u ( x, t ) is an unknown function, and x and t denote spatial and temporal independent variables, respectively, Γ is the boundary of Ω and f ( x, t ) is a known analytic function. A can be divided into two parts: L and N such that: A =L+N (4) L is the simpler part of the partial differential equation which is easier to solve, and N contains the remaining part of A . According to OHAM, one can construct an optimal homotopy φ ( x, t; p ) : Ω × [ 0,1] → ℜ which satisfies: H (φ ( x, t ; p ) , p ) = (1 − p) {L (φ ( x, t ; p )) + f ( x, t )} − H ( p) { A (φ ( x, t ; p )) + f ( x, t )} = 0. (7) Here the auxiliary function H ( p ) is nonzero for p ≠ 0 and H (0) = 0 . Eq (7) is called optimal homotopy equation. Clearly, we have: p = 0 ⇒ H (φ ( x, t;0 ) , 0 ) = L (φ ( x, t;0)) + f ( x, t ) = 0, (8) p = 1 ⇒ H (φ ( x, t ;1) ,1) = H (1) { A (φ ( x, t ;1)) + f ( x, t )} = 0, (9) Obviously, when p = 0 and p = 1 we obtain φ ( x, t;0 ) = u0 ( x, t ) and φ ( x, t;1) = u ( x, t ) respectively. Thus, as p varies from 0 to 1 , the solution φ ( x, t; p ) approaches from u0 ( x, t ) to u ( x, t ) , where u0 ( x, t ) is obtained from Eq (7) for p = 0 : L ( u0 ( x, t ) ) + f ( x, t ) = 0, B ( u0 , ∂u0 / ∂x ) = 0 . 2 (10) Next, we choose auxiliary function H ( p ) in the form H ( p ) = pC1 + p 2C2 + p mCm . (11) To get an approximate solution, we expand φ ( x, t; p, Ci ) by Taylor’s series about p in the following manner, ∞ φ ( x, t ; p, Ci ) = u0 ( x, t ) + ∑ uk ( x, t ; Ci ) p k , i = 1, 2,... . (12) k =1 Substituting Eq. (12) into Eq. (7) and equating the coefficient of like powers of p , we obtain Zeroth order problem, given by Eq. (10), the first and second order problems are given by Eqs. (13-14) respectively and the general governing equations for uk ( x, t ) are given by Eq. (15): L ( u1 ( x, t ) ) = C1N 0 ( u0 ( x, t ) ) , B ( u1 , ∂u1 / ∂x ) = 0 L ( u2 ( x, t ) ) − L ( u1 ( x, t ) ) = C2 N 0 ( u0 ( x, t ) ) + C1 L ( u1 ( x, t ) ) + N 1 ( u0 ( x, t ), u1 ( x, t ) ) , B ( u2 , ∂u2 / ∂x ) = 0, (13) (14) L ( uk ( x, t ) ) − L ( uk −1 ( x, t ) ) = Ck N 0 ( u0 ( x, t ) ) + k −1 ∑ C L ( u i k −i ( x, t ) ) + N k −i ( u0 ( x, t ), u1 ( x, t ),..., uk −i ( x, t ) ) , (15) i =1 k = 2,3,..., B ( uk , ∂uk / ∂x ) = 0, where N k −i ( u0 ( x, t ), u1 ( x, t ),..., uk −i ( x, t ) ) are the coefficient of p k −i in the expansion of N (φ ( x, t ; p ) ) about the embedding parameter p. N (φ ( x, t ; p, Ci ) ) = N 0 ( u0 ( x, t ) ) + ∑ N k ( u0 , u1 , u2 , ... , uk ) p k (16) k ≥1 It should be underscored that the u k for k ≥ 0 are governed by the linear equations with linear boundary conditions that come from the original problem, which can be easily solved. It has been observed that the convergence of the series Eq. (12) depends on the auxiliary constants C1 , C2, ... . If it is convergent at p = 1 , one has: u ( x, t ; Ci ) = u0 ( x, t ) + ∑ uk ( x, t ; Ci ) (17) k ≥1 Substituting Eq. (17) into Eq. (1), it results in the following expression for residual: R ( x, t; Ci ) = L (u ( x, t ; Ci )) + f ( x, t ) + N (u ( x, t; Ci )) (18) In actual computation k = 1, 2,3,..., m . If R ( x, t ; Ci ) = 0 then u ( x, t; Ci ) is the exact solution of the problem. Generally it doesn’t happen, especially in nonlinear problems. For determining auxiliary constants, Ci , i = 1, 2,..., m , there are a number of methods like Galerkin’s Method, Ritz Method, Least Squares Method and Collocation Method. The Method of Least Squares can be applied as under: 3 t J ( Ci ) = ∫ ∫ R ( x, t; C ) dx dt 2 (19) i 0 Ω ∂J ∂J ∂J = = ... = =0. ∂C1 ∂C2 ∂C m (20) The m th order approximate solution can be obtained by these optimal constants. The more general auxiliary function H ( p ) is useful for convergence, which depends on constants C1 , C2, ...Cm , can be optimally identified by Eq. (20) and is useful in error minimization. 3. Application of OHAM to Two Dimensional Nonlinear Wave Equations To demonstrate the effectiveness of the formulation of OHAM, we consider two dimensional nonlinear wave equations of the form (1) with initial conditions t2 u ( 0, t ) = , 2 ∂ u ( 0, t ) = 0. ∂x (21) Applying the method formulated in section 2, leads to L= ∂ 2 u ( x, t ) ∂x 2 , N = −u ( x , t ) ∂ 2u ( x , t ) ∂t 2 , f ( x, t ) = 1 − x2 + t 2 . 2 Zeroth Order Problem ∂u0 ( x, t ) x2 + t 2 , ∂t 2 t2 ∂ u0 ( 0, t ) = , u0 ( 0, t ) = 0. 2 ∂x = 1− (22) Its solution is u0 ( x, t ) = x 2 t 2 x 2t 2 x 4 + − − . 2 2 4 24 (23) First Order Problem ∂ 2u1 ( x, t ) ∂ 2u0 ( x , t ) ∂ 2u0 ( x , t ) x2 t 2 = (1 + C1 ) − C1u0 ( x, t ) + (1 + C1 ) + − 1 , ∂x 2 ∂x 2 ∂t 2 2 2 ∂ u1 ( 0, t ) = 0, u1 ( 0, t ) = 0. (24) ∂x Its solution is 1 x2 t 2 x4 7 x6 x8 u1 ( x, t ) = − t 2 x 2 − + + − (25) C1 . 24 24 720 2688 4 4 Second Order Problem ∂ 2u1 ( x, t ) ∂ 2 u0 ( x , t ) ∂ 2u1 ( x, t ) 1 + + − , − C C C u x t ( ) ( ) 1 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 ∂ u2 ( x , t ) ∂x ∂x ∂t , = 2 2 2 2 2 ∂ u x , t ∂ u x , t ∂x ) − C u x, t ) + C x + t − 1 0( 0( ( ) C1u1 ( x, t ) 2 0 2 ∂t 2 ∂t 2 2 2 ∂ u2 ( 0, t ) = 0, u2 ( 0, t ) = 0. ∂x Its solution is 43 12 2 11 2 10 2 8 − 5 ( −173 + 56t ) x C1 − 4 x C1 + 66 x (−15C1 + 2 2 2 2 2 1 − 15 C + 36 t C − 15 C − 665280 t x C + C + C . ( ) ( ) 1 1 2 1 2 1 u 2 ( x, t ) = 2661120 4 2 2 2 2 +110880 x ((−1 + t )C1 + (−1 + 2t )C1 + (−1 + t )C2 ) 6 2 2 2 2 −3696 x ((−7 + 3t )C1 + (−14 + 11t )C1 + (−7 + 3t )C2 ) (26) (27) Third Order Problem ∂ 2 u 2 ( x, t ) ∂ 2u1 ( x, t ) ∂ 2 u0 ( x , t ) ∂ 2 u2 ( x , t ) 1 + + + − , C C C C u x t ( ) ( ) 1 2 3 1 0 ∂x 2 ∂x 2 ∂x 2 ∂t 2 ∂ 2u3 ( x, t ) ∂ 2 u0 ( x , t ) ∂ 2u1 ( x, t ) ∂ 2u1 ( x, t ) = − − − C u x , t C u x , t C u x , t ( ) ( ) ( ) , 1 2 1 1 2 0 ∂x 2 ∂t 2 ∂t 2 ∂t 2 ∂ 2 u0 ( x , t ) ∂ 2 u0 ( x , t ) x2 t 2 − C3u0 ( x, t ) + C3 + − 1 −C2u1 ( x, t ) 2 2 ∂t ∂t 2 2 u3 ( 0, t ) = 0, ∂ u3 ( 0, t ) = 0. ∂x (28) Its solution is 5 −12 x 2 (352t 2 (37800 − 12600 x 2 + 2310 x 4 − 135 x 6 + 7 x8 ) 2 2 4 6 8 2 + x (2217600 − 1034880 x + 108240 x − 7612 x + 215 x ))C1 + (−13305600 x 4 + 9313920 x 6 − 1591920 x8 + 195800 x10 − 49221 2867 8 12 14 16 2 2 12586 x + 91 x − 240 x − 13 x t (129729600 − 1 u3 ( x , t ) = 64864800 x 4 − 1904760 x 6 + 166452 x8 − 6604 x10 + 231x12 )C13 . 319334400 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 −12 x C1 (660(168t (60 − 10 x + x ) + x (1680 − 392 x + 15 x )) + (352t 2 (37800 − 12600 x 2 + 2310 x 4 − 135 x 6 + 7 x8 ) + x 2 (2217600 −1034880 x 2 + 108240 x 4 − 7612 x 6 + 215 x8 ))C2 ) − 7920 x 2 (168t 2 ( 2 4 2 2 4 60 − 10 x + x ) + x (1680 − 392 x + 15 x ))(C2 + C3 ) (29) Adding equations (23),(25), (27) and (29), we obtain: u ( x, t , C1 , C2 , C3 ) = u0 ( x, t ) + u1 ( x, t , C1 ) + u2 ( x, t , C1 , C2 ) (30) The residual can be calculated by using Eq. (18). For calculations of the constants C1 , C2 and C3 , using (30) in (21) and applying the procedure mentioned in (17)-(18), we get C1 = −1.0639118119872306 , C2 = −9.762978332188523 × 10−4 and C3 = 1.287603572987478 × 10−4 0.5 + 3.12815 ×10−7 x 2 − 1.0409 ×10−4 x 4 + −4 6 −5 8 2 2.812 × 10 x − 2.52425 × 10 x x +3.37375 × 10 −5 x10 − 2.03977 × 10−6 x12 +4.50493 × 10−8 x14 . u ( x, t ) = 0.5 + 1.87689 × 10−3 x 2 − 4.4610 × 10−4 x 4 −3 6 −3 8 2 +1.53732 × 10 x − 1.38661×10 x t +2.28978 ×10−4 x10 − 1.53259 × 10−5 x12 +5.3608 ×10−7 x14 (31) The exact solution is [2] u ( x, t ) = x2 + t 2 , 2 and HPM solution is [2] 6 (32) t 2 x2 x4 x8 x 6t 2 327 x8 + − + + − 2 2 24 2688 240 241920 u ( x, t ) _ HPM = 8 2 . x10t 2 1038 x10 x12 xt + 1120 − 21600 + 3628800 − 107520 (33) Table 1. Comparison of Exact, HPM and OHAM solutions for different values of x and t x 0 0.062 0.156 0.225 0.187 0.281 0.343 0.350 0.468 0.369 0.350 0.539 0.780 0.593 0.620 0.656 0.781 0.843 0.968 0.975 1.000 Table 2 t 0 0.162 0.156 0.128 0.275 0.281 0.343 0.263 0.468 0.384 0.870 0.403 0.111 0.593 0.685 0.656 0.781 0.843 0.968 0.692 1.000 Exact solution 0.00000 0.015044 0.024336 0.033504 0.055297 0.078961 0.117649 0.095834 0.219024 0.141801 0.439700 0.226465 0.310360 0.351649 0.426813 0.430336 0.609961 0.710649 0.937024 0.714744 1.000000 HPM solution 0.000000 0.015044 0.024336 0.033505 0.055297 0.078961 0.117650 0.095835 0.219032 0.141810 0.439706 0.226476 0.310263 0.351704 0.426913 0.430462 0.610499 0.711668 0.940295 0.716206 1.004310 OHAM solution 0.00000 0.015044 0.024336 0.033504 0.055297 0.0789608 0.117648 0.095834 0.219022 0.141808 0.439697 0.226463 0.310358 0.351647 0.426808 0.430332 0.609963 0.710652 0.936958 0.714690 0.999877 Comparison of absolute errors of HPM and OHAM solutions for different values of x and t x 0 0.062 0.156 0.225 0.187 0.281 0.343 0.350 0.468 t 0 0.162 0.156 0.128 0.275 0.281 0.343 0.263 0.468 E* 0.00000000 6.003 × 10 −12 1.128 × 10 −9 2.613 × 10 −9 1.213 × 10 −8 1.275 × 10 −7 6.370 × 10 −7 3.309 × 10 −7 7.922 × 10 −7 7 E ** 0.00000000 1.74057 × 10 −12 6.00903 × 10 −9 2.49951 × 10 −9 3.5136 × 10 −8 1.91487 × 10 −7 5.53487 × 10 −7 4.03006 × 10 −7 2.28841 × 10 −7 0.369 0.350 0.539 0.780 0.593 0.620 0.656 0.781 0.843 0.968 0.975 1.000 0.384 0.870 0.403 0.111 0.593 0.685 0.656 0.781 0.843 0.968 0.692 1.000 1.273 × 10 −6 5.736 × 10 −6 1.122 × 10 −6 9.873 × 10 −5 5.497 × 10 −5 1.010 × 10 −4 1.263 × 10 −4 5.378 × 10 −4 1.019 × 10 −3 3.271 × 10 −3 1.461 × 10 −3 4.310 × 10 −3 8.50245 × 10 −7 3.11566 × 10 −6 2.45830 × 10 −6 4.00013 × 10 −6 4.1745 × 10 −6 4.68453 × 10 −6 3.64289 × 10 −6 2.2877 × 10 −6 2.6668 × 10 −6 6.56401× 10 −5 5.41072 × 10 −5 1.22591× 10 −4 E * = HPM − Exact , E** = OHAM − Exact Fig. 1, 3D plot for the OHAM solution at t = 1 . 8 Fig. 2, 3D plot for the Exact solution at t = 1 . 1.0 OHAM Exact 0.9 uHxL 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 x Fig. 3, 2D plot for the OHAM and Exact solutions at t = 1 . 9 0.00002 Residual 0.00001 0 - 0.00001 - 0.00002 - 0.00003 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 x Fig. 4, 2D plot for the residual of OHAM at t = 1 . 0.5 Exact Zeroth Order First Order Second Order Third Order uHx,tL 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 x Fig. 5, 2D plot for the convergence of orders of OHAM solution at t = 1 . 4. Results and Discussions The formulation presented in section 2, provides accurate solutions for the problems demonstrated in section 3. We have used Mathematica 7 for most of our computational work. In Table 1 and Figs. 1-3, we have compared the OHAM results with the results obtained by HPM and Exact for various values of x and t at spatial domain [0,1] for table 1 and at different values of x and fixed value of t = 1 for figures 1-3. In Table 2, we have presented absolute errors at different values of x and t . Fig. 4 presents the residual at a spatial domain [0,1] at t = 1 . The convergence of OHAM is presented in Fig. 5 at t = 1 . 5. Conclusion 10 In this paper, we studied the two dimensional nonlinear wave equation. We have used the OHAM to approximate the solution of the titled problem. It is clear from the present work that OHAM can successfully be applied to nonlinear phenomena like the one we had. The obtained results are accurate which shows the effectiveness and validity of the proposed method. It is observed that OHAM is simpler in applicability, more convenient to control the convergence and involve less computational work. 6. References 1. A.A. Hemeda, Variational Iteration Method for solving wave equation. Comp. Math. Appl. (2008) 56, 1948-1953. 2. M. Ghasemi, M.T. Kajani, A. Darar, Numerical solution of two dimensional nonlinear differential equation by Homotopy perturbation method. Appl. Math. Comp. (2007) 189, 341-345. 3. J.D. Cole, Perturbation methods in applied Mathematics Whitham, Mass. Blasi. Publ. Comp. (1968). 4. A.H. Nayfeh, D.T. Mook, Nonlinear Oscilations. New York. John. Will. Sons. (1979). 5. S.J. Laio, The proposed homotopy analysis technique for the solution of nonlinear problems. PhD thesis, Shang. Jiao Tong Uni. (1992). 6. S.J. Liao, A kind of approximate solution technique which does not depend upon small parameters. Int. J. Nonlinear. Mech. (1997) 32, 815-822. 7. S.J. Liao, A new branch of solutions of boundary-layer flows over a stretching flat plate. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Tran. (2005) 49, 2529-2539. 8. S.J. Liao, A new branch of solution of boundary-layer flows over a permeable stretching plate. Int. J. Nonlinear. Mech. (2007) 42, 819-830. 9. J.H. He, Homotopy perturbation technique. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. (1999) 178, 257-262. 10. J.H. He, Homotopy perturbation method for bifurcation on nonlinear problems. Int. J. Nonl. Sci. Num. Sim. (2005) 8, 207-218. 11. J.H. He, Asymptotology by homotopy perturbation method. Appl. Math. Comp. (2004) 156, 591-596. 12. J.H. He, Application of homotopy perturbation method to nonlinear wave equations. Chao. Soli. Frac. (2005) 26, 695-700. 13. J.H. He, The homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear oscillators with discontinuities. Appl. Math. Comp. (2004) 151, 287-292. 14. D.D. Ganji, A. Sadighi, Applications of He’s homotopy perturbation method to nonlinear coupled systems of reaction-diffusion equations. Int. J. Nonl. Sci. Num. Sim. (2006) 7, 411-418. 15. D.D. Ganji, A. Rajabi, Assessment of homotopy-perturbation and perturbation methods in heat radiation equation. Int. Comm. Heat. Mass. Trans. (2006) 33, 391-400. 11 16. D.D. Ganji, M. Nourollahi, E. Mohseni, Application of He’s method to nonlinear chemistry problems. Comp. Math. Appl. (2007) 54, 1122-1132. 17. G. Domiarry, S. Nadim, Assessment of homotopy analysis method and homotopy perturbation method in non- linear heat transfer equation. Int. Comm. Heat. Mass. Trans. (2008) 35, 93-102. 18. S.X. Liang, D.J. Jeffrey, Comparison of homotopy analysis method and homotopy perturbation method through an evaluation equation. Comm. Nonl. Sci. Num. Sim. (2009) 14, 4057-4064. 19. V. Marinca, N. Herisanu, Optimal homotopy asymptotic method with application to thin film flow. Cent. Euro. J. Phys. (2008) 6, 648-653. 20. V. Marinca, N. Herisanu, Accurate solutions of oscillators with discountiuties and fractional-power with restoring force by means of optimal homotopy asymptotic method. Comp. Math. Appl. (2010) 60, 1607-1615. 21. V. Marinca, N, Herisnau, Determination of periodic solutions for the motion of a particle on rotating parabola by means of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method. J. Sound. Vibr. (2010) 239, 1450-1459. 22. H. Ullah, S. Islam, M. Idrees and M. Arif, Solution of Boundary Layer Problems with Heat Transfer by Optimal Homotopy Asymptotic Method. Abst. App. Anal.Volu. 2013 (2013), Arti. ID 324869, 10 pages. 23. R. Nawaz, H. Ullah. S. Islam, M. Idrees, Application of optimal homotopy asymptotic method to Burger’s equations. J. Appl. Math. Vol. (2013) Art ID 387478, 8 pages. 24. H. Ullah, S. Islam, M. Idrees, R. Nawaz, Optimal Homotopy Asymptotic Method to doubly wave solutions of the coupled Drinfel’d-Sokolv-Wilson equations, Math. Prob. Engg. Arti. Volu. (2013) ID 362816, 8 pages. 25. H. Ullah, S. Islam, M. Idrees, M. Fiza, Solution of the differential-difference equation by optimal homotopy asymptotic method. Abst. Appl. Anal. Volu. (2014) Arti. ID. 520467, 7 pages. 26. H. Ullah, S. Islam, I. Khan, S. Shardian, M. Fiza, Approximate solution of the generalized coupled Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV equation by extended optimal homotopy asymptotic method. MAGNT Rese. Repor. Vol. 2 (7). PP: 3022-3036. 12
© Copyright 2024