Effectiveness of jigsaw, think-pair-share and numbered heads together on students' oral participation in speaking lessons Nghiên cứu hiê ̣u quả của các hoa ̣t đô ̣ng Jigsaw, Think-Pair-Share và Numbered Heads Together đố i với sự tham gia của sinh viên trong giờ ho ̣c nói Nguyễn Thị Thu Thủy University of Languages and International Studies M.A. Thesis English Teaching Methodology; Mã số: 60 14 10 Supervisor : Dr. Tô Thi ̣Thu Hương Năm bảo vệ: 2012 Abstract. This was an action research aiming at seeking out the causes of students’ poor participation in speaking classes and solutions to the problem. The research was conducted on 30 subjects who were the first year English major students at Hanoi Pedagogical University No.2. The result from initial data showed that one of the main causes of students’ poor participation was teaching techniques which did not really get students actively involved in speaking activities. After the problem was defined, an action plan was implemented with the use of three cooperative techniques: Jigsaw, Numbered Heads Together and Think-pair-share which were implicated from previous studies to be an effective tool for improving students’ interaction in English classes. Data collected from survey questionnaires, students’ self-report, and observations gave positive results showing the significant increase in students’ participation in speaking class. This proved positive effects of Jigsaw, Numbered Heads Together and Thinkpair-share on students’ participation in speaking classes. Keywords. Ngôn ngữ; Tiếng Anh; Kỹ năng nói; Phương pháp giảng dạy Content. The study is divided in to three partsfive chapters as followed: Part one, Introduction, provides an overview of the study including statement of the problem, the aims, scope of the study, research questions, and brief introduction to research method. Part two, Development, consists of the following four chapters: - Chapter 1, Literature review, presents the theoretical background of the studies with key relevant concepts clarified and previous related studies reviewed. - Chapter 2, Methodology, describes the methods of the study. The research context, participants, data collection instruments, research procedure and data analysis are all mentioned in this chapter. - Chapter 3, Results, presents the findings of the study. - Chapter 4, Discussion discusses the finding of the research. Part three, Conclusion, concludes the action research. It also presents the recommendations, limitations of the study, and suggestions for further study in the same field. References. Bailey K. M. (2005), Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking, The MacGrawHill companies. Inc. Brown, H. D. (1994), Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy, New jersey: Prentice Hall Regents. Brown, H. D. (2007), Principles of language learning and teaching, (5th ed.), White Plains: Pearson Longman. Burn, A., & Joyce, H. (1997), Focus on Speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research. Carter, R., & Mac Carthy, M. (1995), “Grammar and spoken language”, Applied Linguistics, 16(2), pp.141-158. Davis, B. G. (1993), Tools for teaching, San Francisco. Davis, B. G. (1999), “Cooperative learning: students working in small group”, CTL: Speaking of Teaching, 10(2). Do Thi Thanh Tra. (2009), Using Authentic Materials to motivate second year English major students at Tay Bac University during speaking lessons, Tay Bac University. Dycus, D. (1996), “Making Jigsaw Activities Using Newspaper Articles”, The Internet TESL Journal, 2(2). Ferrance, E. (2000), Action research, Brown University. Garfield, J. (1993), “Teaching statistics using small-group cooperative learning”, Journal of statistic education, 1(1). Green, D. (2008), “Class participation in a teaching training college: What is it and factors influence it”, ELTED, Vol. XI. Hedge, T. (2000), Teaching and learning in the Language Classroom, Oxford University Press. Hoang Thi Lan. (2005), Applying Cooperative Learning to develop speaking skills for the first year students at Vinh University, Unpublished MA thesis, College of Foreign Languages, Hanoi. Hopkins, D. (1985), A teachers' guide to classroom research, Milton Keyness: Open University Press. Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. S. (2004), “The Bystander effects: A lens for understanding Patterns of Participation”, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), pp. 165-195. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994), “New circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school”, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Kagan, S. (1989), “The structural approach to cooperative learning”, Educational Leadership, 47(4), pp.12-15. Kagan, S. (1994), Cooperative learning, San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publication. Kayi, H. (2006), “Teaching speaking Activities to promote speaking in a second language”, The Internet TESL Journal, 7(11). Khadidja, K. (2010), The effect of classroom interaction on developing the learner's speaking skill, Unpublished TEFL. Lacina, J. G. (2001), “Cultural Kickboxing in the ESL Classroom: Encouraging active participation”, The Internet TESL Journal, 7(10). Le Thi Bich Thuy. (2006), An action research on the application of cooperative learning to teaching speaking to the second year students at the Department of English, Gia Lai Teachers' Training College, Unpublished MA thesis, College of Foreign Languages. Ledlow, S. (1999), Cooperative learning in higher education, CLTE, Arizona State University. Lee, P. (2005), Students' personality types and attitudes toward classroom participation, Paper presented at the CATESOL State Conference, Los Angeles. Lightbrown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999), How languages are learned, Oxford University Press. Lotfy, N. (2012), Seating arrangement and cooperative learning activities: Students' on-task/off-task participation in EFL classroom, Unpublished Master of art, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, the American University in Cairo, Cairo. Lyman, F. (1987), “Think-Pair-Share: An expanding teaching technique”, MAA-CIE, Cooperative News, Vol. I, pp.1-2. Macpherson, A. (2000), Cooperative learning: group activities for college course: A guide for instructions, Kwantlen University College. McBride, R., & Schostak, J., Action research, Retrieved December 25, 2011, from http://www.enquirylearning.net/ELU/Issues/Research/Res1Ch4.html Mettetal, G. (2002-2003), “Improving Teaching through Classroom Action Research”, Toward the Best in the Academy, 14(7). Nguyen Minh Hue. (2010), “Encouraging reluctant ESL/EFL learners to speak in the classroom”, The Internet TESL Journal, 16(3). Nguyen Thi Phuong Lan. (2007), Large class management to improve students' participation in speaking lessons: An action research, Unpublished MA thesis, Hanoi University. Nor, F. M. & Choo L. H. (2010), “An investigation into the factors affecting second language learners' classroom participation”, UTM, pp.1-8. Peacook, M. (1998), “Usefulness and Enjoyableness of Teaching Materials as Predictors of On-Task Behavior”. TESL-EJ, 3(2). Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S.(2001), Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press. Sayadi, Z. A. B. (2007), An investigation into first year engineering students ' oral classroom participation, a case study, Unpublished thesis, Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Slattery, B. (2010), “Effects of cooperative learning on a second year junior certificate science class”, The teaching Council. Slavin, R. E. (1987), “Cooperative learning and the cooperative school”, Educational Leadership, 45, pp.7-13. Snell, J. (1999), “Improving teacher-student interaction in the EFL classroom. An action research”, The Internet TESL Journal, 5(4). Supartini, R. (2010), The English teaching methods for the 4th grade students in SDN 03 Pendem, Mojogedang, Unpublished English Diploma Program, Sebelas Maret. Susan, R. (2009), “The Jigsaw classroom”, Connecting Education and Careers, 84(4), pp. 8. Swan, M. (1993). “The output hypothesis focus: just speaking and writing are not enough”, The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50/1. Tan, G., Gallo, P. B., Jacob, G. M., & Lee, C. K. (1999), “Using cooperative learning to integrate thinking and information technology in a content-based writing lesson”, The Internet TESL Journal, 5(8). Tatsuki, D. H. (1998), “Jigsaw Reading Activities Using TV Listings”, The Internet TESL Journal, 4(3). Tsou, W. (2005), “Using instruction about classroom participation to increase students' oral participation”, Foreign Language Annais, 38(1). Wallace, M. (1998), Action research for language teacher, Cambridge University Press. Yahya, N., & Huie, K. L. (2002), “Reaching English language learners through cooperative learning”, The Internet TESL Journal, 8(3).
© Copyright 2024