REALIZING THE POTENTIAL INVESTOR INVESTOR PRESENTATION PRESENTATION January 2015 JULY 2014 Disclaimer This presentation is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed to be a prospectus, offering memorandum, advertisement or public offering of any securities of MEG Energy Corp. (“MEG”). Neither the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) nor any other state securities regulator nor any securities regulatory authority in Canada or elsewhere has assessed the merits of MEG’s securities or has reviewed or made any determination as to the truthfulness or completeness of the disclosure in this document. Any representation to the contrary is an offence. Recipients of this presentation are not to construe the contents of this presentation as legal, tax or investment advice and recipients should consult their own advisors in this regard. MEG has not registered (and has no current intention to register) its securities under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”), or any state securities or “blue sky” laws and MEG is not registered under the United States Investment Act of 1940, as amended. The securities of MEG may not be offered or sold in the United States or to U.S. persons unless registered under the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available. Without limiting the foregoing, please be advised that certain financial information relating to MEG contained in this presentation was prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, which differ from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and elsewhere. Accordingly, financial information included in this document may not be comparable to financial information of United States issuers. The information concerning petroleum reserves and resources appearing in this document was derived from a report of GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. dated effective as of December 31, 2013, which has been prepared in accordance with the Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 51-101 entitled Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (“NI 51-101”) at that time. The standards of NI 51-101 differ from the standards of the SEC. The SEC generally permits U.S. reporting oil and gas companies in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserves, net of royalties and interests of others. NI 51-101, meanwhile, permits disclosure of estimates of contingent resources and reserves on a gross basis. As a consequence, information included in this presentation concerning our reserves and resources may not be comparable to information made by public issuers subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC. There are significant differences in the criteria associated with the classification of reserves and contingent resources. Contingent resource estimates involve additional risk, specifically the risk of not achieving commerciality, not applicable to reserves estimates. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any portion of the resources. The estimates of reserves, resources and future net revenue from individual properties may not reflect the same confidence level as estimates of reserves, resources and future net revenue for all properties, due to the effects of aggregation. Further information regarding the estimates and classification of MEG’s reserves and resources is contained within the Corporation’s public disclosure documents on file with Canadian Securities regulatory authorities, and in particular, within MEG’s most recent annual information form (the “AIF”). MEG’s public disclosure documents, including the AIF, may be accessed through the SEDAR website (www.sedar.com), at MEG’s website (www.megenergy.com), or by contacting MEG’s investor relations department. Anticipated netbacks are calculated by adding anticipated revenues and other income and subtracting anticipated royalties, operating costs and transportation costs from such amount. INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 2 Disclosure Advisories Forward-Looking Statements This document may contain forward-looking information including but not limited to: expectations of future production, revenues, expenses, cash flow, operating costs, steam-oil ratios (“SORs”), pricing differentials, reliability, profitability and capital investments; estimates of reserves and resources; the anticipated reductions in operating costs as a result of optimization and scalability of certain operations; and the anticipated sources of funding for operations and capital investments. Such forward-looking information is based on management's expectations and assumptions regarding future growth, results of operations, production, future capital and other expenditures, plans for and results of drilling activity, environmental matters, business prospects and opportunities. By its nature, such forward-looking information involves significant known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: risks associated with the oil and gas industry, for example, the securing of adequate supplies and access to markets and transportation infrastructure; the availability of capacity on the electrical transmission grid; the uncertainty of reserve and resource estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating to production, costs and revenues; health, safety and environmental risks; risks of legislative and regulatory changes to, amongst other things, tax, land use, royalty and environmental laws; assumptions regarding and the volatility of commodity prices and foreign exchange rates; risks and uncertainties associated with securing and maintaining the necessary regulatory approvals and financing to proceed with the expansion of MEG’s projects; risks and uncertainties related to the timing of completion, commissioning, start-up, of MEG’s future phases, expansions and projects; and the operational risks and delays in the development, exploration, production, and the capacities and performance associated with MEG's projects. Although MEG believes that the assumptions used in such forward-looking information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such assumptions will be correct. Accordingly, readers are cautioned that the actual results achieved may vary from the forward-looking information provided herein and that the variations may be material. Readers are also cautioned that the foregoing list of assumptions, risks and factors is not exhaustive. Further information regarding the assumptions and risks inherent in the making of forward-looking statements can be found in MEG’s annual information form (“AIF”) dated March 5, 2014, along with MEG's other public disclosure documents. Copies of the AIF and MEG's other public disclosure documents are available through the SEDAR website which is available at www.sedar.com. The forward-looking information included in this document is expressly qualified in its entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements. Unless otherwise stated, the forward-looking information included in this document is made as of the date of this document and the Corporation assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information to reflect new events or circumstances, except as required by law. Market Data This presentation contains statistical data, market research and industry forecasts that were obtained from government or other industry publications and reports or based on estimates derived from such publications and reports and management’s knowledge of, and experience in, the markets in which MEG operates. Government and industry publications and reports generally indicate that they have obtained their information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of their information. Often, such information is provided subject to specific terms and conditions limiting the liability of the provider, disclaiming any responsibility for such information, and/or limiting a third party’s ability to rely on such information. None of the authors of such publications and reports has provided any form of consultation, advice or counsel regarding any aspect of, or is in any way whatsoever associated with, MEG. Further, certain of these organizations are advisors to participants in the oil sands industry, and they may present information in a manner that is more favourable to that industry than would be presented by an independent source. Actual outcomes may vary materially from those forecast in such reports or publications, and the prospect for material variation can be expected to increase as the length of the forecast period increases. While management believes this data to be reliable, market and industry data is subject to variations and cannot be verified due to limits on the availability and reliability of data inputs, the voluntary nature of the data gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties inherent in any market or other survey. Accordingly, the accuracy, currency and completeness of this information cannot be guaranteed. None of MEG, its affiliates or the underwriters has independently verified any of the data from third party sources referred to in this presentation or ascertained the underlying assumptions relied upon by such sources. INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 3 Realizing the Potential 2015 • Targeted 2015 annual production volumes of 78,000 to 82,000 bpd, 19% above 2014’s upwardly revised guidance • Ongoing reservoir and plant efficiency measures, supporting a non-energy operating cost target of $8 to $10 per barrel in 2015, taking into account two maintenance turnarounds • Hub and spoke marketing strategy targets access to highest-priced markets in the most cost-effective manner INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 4 High Quality 100%-Owned Oil Sands Assets 2.9 billion barrels 2P and 3.7 billion barrels contingent resources* identified to-date Christina Lake Phase 1, 2 and 2B currently in production 2014 production guidance 65,000 to 70,000 bpd Regulatory approvals in place for 210,000 bpd 2P Reserves.............................................. 2,260 MMbbls Contingent Resources*............................... 946 MMbbls 2P Reserves PV-10%................................... $18,991 MM Resources* PV-10%...................................... $3,320 MM Lease Holdings……………………………………….. 51,200 acres Surmont Submitted regulatory application in 2012 for 120,000 bpd, multi-phased project Christina Lake Surmont Growth Properties * Best-estimate contingent resources Based on GLJ Reserve Report dated effective as of December 31, 2013. Present values of estimated future net cash flows do not represent the fair market value of reserves or resources. INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 2P Reserves ................................................ 637 MMbbls Contingent Resources*............................... 404 MMbbls 2P Reserves PV-10%..................................... $2,031 MM Resources* PV-10%...................................... $3,302 MM Lease Holdings .......................................... 20,480 acres Growth Properties Contingent Resources*............................ 2,303 MMbbls Resources* PV-10% ..................................... $7,386 MM Lease Holdings – Evaluated...................... 218,240 acres Lease Holdings – Unevaluated................. 330,880 acres 5 Geology Confirms High Quality Reservoirs Core hole drilling identifies similar characteristics at Christina Lake and Surmont Average Pay Thickness Bitumen Saturation (metres) (%) Christina Lake Phase 1 26 Christina Lake Phase 2 Porosity Permeability (%) (millidarcies) 72 34 3,000 - 7,000 25 80 34 3,000 - 7,000 Christina Lake Phase 2B 28 75 33 3,000 - 7,000 Christina Lake Phase 3A 23 79 32 3,000 - 7,000 Surmont 26 76 34 3,000 - 7,000 INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 6 RISER – the right way to grow A three-part initiative Reduce the steam-oil-ratio of our existing operations using our proprietary eMSAGP technology Redeploy freed-up steam to new, pre-drilled SAGD wells to further increase production Debottleneck central facilities to handle increased throughput INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 7 Benefits of the RISER Initiative The RISER initiative focuses investment on projects which are expected to generate the highest returns and lead to near-term production and cash flow gains Anticipated Benefits • Lower capital cost • Lower operating costs • Higher production • Higher recoveries • Lower greenhouse gas emissions INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 8 Phase 1 eMSAGP Performance Christina Lake Pad A Steam injection reduced by 55% since the implementation of eMSAGP A3N* A2N A3N* A3 Phase 1 SAGD wells A2N A2 A1N A1 Infill wells A7N* Infill wells INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 NCG/steam co-injection 9 Strong Cash Operating Netbacks Low-cost structure and hub-and-spoke marketing strategy delivers high netbacks Business Environment 2014 YTD WTI US$/bbl 99.61 AECO C$/mcf 4.80 FX C/US$ 1.09 Differential – WTI/Blend % 26% Diluent price – % of WTI 101% Netbacks Blend sales Cost of diluent 80.49 (13.47) Bitumen realization 67.02 Transportation (1.22) Royalties (4.86) Operating costs – non-energy (8.59) Operating costs – energy (6.71) Power sales Cash operating netback 2.54 48.18 C$ per barrel unless specified INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 10 Marketing Strategy MEG’s Hub & Spoke strategy focuses on diversifying market access, bypassing pipeline congestion to get to world-priced markets HUB • • Access Pipeline 50%-owned: dual dilbit/condensate pipeline Stonefell Terminal 100%-owned Pipeline • • U.S. Midwest accessible via existing pipelines U.S. Gulf Coast accessible via secured capacity on Flanagan/Seaway Rail • • Direct pipe-to-rail connection from Stonefell to 3rd party rail- loading terminal Broad access to North American markets Barge • INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 Pipe-to-barge access to U.S. Gulf Coast and Louisiana 11 Canadian & U.S Crude Oil Pipelines and Proposals Source: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 12 North American Rail Network Source: Rail Association of Canada INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 13 Rail Loading Terminals in Western Canada Nearly 1 million bpd of rail offloading capacity, further expandable to 1.4 million bpd Rail Capacity from Western Canada INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 Source: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers 14 Financing Philosophy Conservative principles provide flexibility through various market conditions • Pre-funding of capital programs • Maintain significant liquidity at all times • All debt is free of maintenance financial covenants • Significant internal funding capability over the next few years • Debt maturities aligned to long-term nature of growth strategy INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 15 Financial Snapshot Liquidity As of September 30, 2014 Cash and cash equivalents 0.78 Undrawn revolving credit facility (revolver) 2.80 (1) Letters of credit outstanding under the line of credit 0.00 (2) 3.58 (1)(2) Outstanding Debt Senior secured term loan due 2020 1.42 6.5% Senior unsecured notes due 2021 0.84 6.375% Senior unsecured notes due 2023 0.90 7.0% Senior unsecured notes due 2024 1.12 4.28 Book Value of Equity 4.89 In C$ billions, assume US$1 = C$1.1208 S&P ratings on MEG’s outstanding debt are BBB- and BB for the senior secured term loan and our three senior unsecured notes respectively, as of September 30, 2014. Moody’s ratings on MEG’s outstanding debt are Ba1 and B1 for the senior secured term loan and our three senior unsecured notes respectively, as of September 30, 2014. (1) (2) Pro forma undrawn line of credit reflects US$500M upsize in November 2014. In December 2014, MEG implemented a stand-alone US$500 million Letter of Credit facility guaranteed by Export Development Canada (EDC). Letters of Credit issued under this facility do not consume revolver capacity. All letters of credit issued under the revolver have now been moved to the EDC Letter of Credit facility. INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 16 Debt Maturity Schedule No debt maturity until 2020 $1,197* US$ in millions $1,000 Term loan* Senior unsecured notes 2014 2015 2016 2017 $800 $750 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 * Projected amortized term loan balance at maturity in 2020. The term loan amortizes at $13 million per year. INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 17 APPENDICES Rail Loading Terminals in Western Canada Major* existing and proposed crude loading terminals * Facilities with less than 15,000 b/d are not shown. ** Capacities of facilities are not exactly comparable due to differences within factors used to determine capacity such as terminal operating hours, available car spots, contracts in place. Source: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 19 Enhanced Modified Steam and Gas Push (eMSAGP)* A combination of proven technologies to reduce SOR • Non-condensable gas (NCG) and infill wells are proven technologies, typically carried out as a wind-down process after 6 - 8 years of SAGD operations • Early application of eMSAGP has the potential to significantly reduce SORs while accelerating bitumen production and increasing ultimate recoveries *Steam and Gas Push (SAGP) was invented by the late Dr. Roger Butler, who also invented the SAGD process. INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 20 Christina Lake Delineation Wells 80 delineation wells drilled during the winter of 2014 6 Miles MEG Oil Sands Leases Christina Lake 80 sections 964 vertical wells drilled to June 30th 2014 831 wells cored to June 30th 2014 Phase 2 Phase 1 Wabiskaw / McMurray cores Phase 2B 2014 delineation wells CVE Christina Lake INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 21 Surmont Delineation Wells 8 delineation wells drilled during the winter of 2014 5 miles South Surmont 25 sections 138 vertical wells drilled to June 30th 2014 89 wells cored to June 30th 2014 MEG Oil Sands Leases Wabiskaw / McMurray cores 2014 delineation wells INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 22 Comparing Crudes – Wells to Wheels SAGD with cogeneration produces one of the lowest greenhouse gas intensity barrels in the industry Conventional* In Situ Unconventional* 114 104 Unit Measurement (g/MJ) 106 105 102 102 102 98 96 INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 SAGD Dilbit SOR 2.4 with Cogen SAGD Dilbit SOR 3.0 Arab Medium, Saudi Kiruk, Iraq Bachaquero, Venezuela Maya, Mexico Mars, Gulf Coast Bonny Light, Nigeria Kern River, California *Source: Jacobs Consultancy, “Life Cycle Assessment of North America and Imported Crudes” July 2009. 23 Notes: INVESTOR PRESENTATION 2015 Investor Relations Contacts Helen Kelly Director, Investor Relations 403.767.6206 [email protected] John Rogers VP, Investor Relations and External Communications 403.770.5335 [email protected] www.megenergy.com/investors
© Copyright 2024