APIIC CETPs Needs Assessment Study International Conference on Solid Waste Management Maloth Nanu, G.Durga Prasad, R. Hrishikesh Mahadev Page 1 Contents » About APIIC-GIZ Cooperation » About the Study » Approach » Industrial Zones of Andhra Pradesh » Methodology » Criteria for selecting Industrial Estates for CETP » Decision Matrix Analysis » Short-listing of Industrial estates for pre-feasibility studies Page 2 About APIIC and GIZ Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Cooperation (APIIC) incorporated on September 26, 1973 is the state owned organization vested with the responsibility of developing industrial parks and industrial infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh. APIIC has so far developed over 300 industrial areas spreading over an extent of more than 150,000 acres The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH is an international cooperation enterprise for sustainable development, Company owned by the German Federal Government It has now been working in India for over 50 years. GIZ operates in 130 countries. GIZ employs 17,000 staff worldwide 12.01.2017 Page 3 Background of APIIC-GIZ Cooperation In 2004, CPCB in cooperation GIZ, APIIC, and APPCB will work on “Planning and developing eco-industrial parks with technical support in Andhra Pradesh” After pilot phase, MoU was extended with request from APIIC to 2012 under Advisory Services in Environment Management (ASEM) Under the Indo-German Environment Partnership Programme, technical cooperation has been provided by GIZ to APIIC from 2012 - 2015. Page 4 Introduction What is a CETP? Common Effluent Treatment Plant is a facility of treating effluents by means of a collective effort mainly for a cluster of small scale industrial units. Purpose: • Reduced treatment costs for individual units (‘economies of scale’) • Centralised service. Individual industries can concentrate on their core business, while CETP operator provides service. • Reduced need for technical expertise and trained personnel as fewer plants require fewer people. • Optimal utilisation of space at a common facility than with several plants in several individual industries. ] • Easy to monitor and regulate pollution control. • Possibility for recycle/reuse of treated waste water and proper Page 5 disposal. MoEF’s CETPs Scheme: » Scope of CETP Scheme: Establishment of new CETPs in an industrial estate or a cluster of SSIs. Up-gradation / modernization proposal for CETPs of earlier financed through the MoEF shall be considered for the one time funding. » Assistance provided: Central assistance of 50% of the total project cost, with a ceiling of Rs 15 Crores for non-ZLD and Rs. 20 Crores for ZLDs. State gov. to provide 25 % of the total project cost. Project proponents to put in 25% out of which: • 15% should be contribution for project proponent and remaining • 10% should be loan from banks / financial institutions Page 6 Objective The objective of the study is to identify industrial parks of APIIC in Andhra Pradesh that need establishment of the Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) on priority. The specific objectives are: Collection of information regarding industrial parks of APIIC and To understand the location of industrial parks and type of industrial activity. Documentation of the collected information by developing a GIS based database, for the purpose of analysis and thematic presentation. To develop and apply an appropriate methodology for rapid assessment of industrial parks for assessing CETP needs. To identify the priority industrial parks of APIIC that need CETPs. 12.01.2017 Page 7 Approach Collection of Data from MIS Questionnaire Survey for Zonal Managers Screening of Industrial Estates based on defined criteria Discussion with ZM / ZO on the requirement of CETP Shortlisting Industrial Estate Shortlisting Industrial Estate Feedback from APPCB Discussion with APIIC on the selected industrial estate Shortlisted Industrial estates for pre-feasibility studies Detailed Questionnaire survey with ZM / IALA/ member industries Visit to Industrial Estates and collection of data from ZO and IALA for selected parks Collection of data from APPCB Inputs from the National Seminar Shortlisting of Industries for feasibility studies Page 8 CETPs in India Page 9 IPs in Andhra Pradesh APIIC Zone No of Industrial Parks CYBERABAD 16 JEEDIMETLA 24 KADAPPA 31 KAKINADA 25 KARIMNAGAR 14 KURNOOL 27 MOULA ALI 10 NELLORE 35 PATANCHERU 23 SHAMSHABAD 24 TIRUPATHI 28 VIJAYWADA 43 VISAKHAPATNAM 28 VISAKHAPATNAM (SPL) 15 WARANGAL 20 TOTAL 365 Page 10 IPs in Andhra Pradesh Page 11 Criteria for Shortlisting IPs Needing CETP Criteria 1: Area of the Industrial Estate Area of the Industrial Park < 75 Acres Need for CETP Low 75 to 400 Acres Medium 400 to 750 Acres High > 750 Acres Very High Criteria 2: IP Categorization Based on Pollution Potential of Industries Effluent Category Need for CETP W4 Low W3 Medium W2 High W1 Very High Page 12 Criteria for selecting IP for CETP Criteria 3: Water Consumption Wastewater Generation Need for CETP <1,000 KLD Low 1,000 – 2,000 KLD Medium 2,000 – 3,000 KLD High > 3,000 KLD Very High Criteria 4: APIIC Zonal Managers Feedback ZM List Need for CETP No, not required Low Yes, required Very High Criteria 5: Bio-degradability / toxicity of waste Bio-degradability Need for CETP No Low Yes Very High Page 13 Industry Categorization 12.01.2017 Page 14 Area of Industrial Estates 12.01.2017 Page 15 IP Categorisation: Pollution Potential 12.01.2017 Page 16 IP Categorisation: Water Consumption 12.01.2017 Page 17 IP Categorisation: Needs Expressed by ZMs of APIIC 12.01.2017 Page 18 IP Categorisation: Biodegradability of Wastewater 12.01.2017 Page 19 Shortlist -1 Elimination Process Elimination Process: IPs with industries of low pollution potential (only W4 category) IPs already having CETP, other IPs supported by the existing CETPs, IPs with CETP under consideration/construction Non operational IPs due to lack of industries and sick/closed industries Page 20 Shortlist - 2 Based on Area and Pollution Potential Decision Matrix 1 Nos. W1 to W3 >=75 Very high W1 to W3 >=50 and <75 High W1 to W3 >=25 and<50 Medium W1 to W3 <25 Low Area >=750 Acres Very High Very High 1 Very High 1 Very High 0 Very High 17 >=400 and <750 High Very High 1 Very High 0 High 5 High 09 >=75 and <400 Medium Very High 1 High 0 High 4 Medium 55 Very High 0 High 0 Medium 0 Very Low 184 <75 Low Low No:184 High No: 18 Medium No:55 Very High NO:21 Page 21 12.01.2017 Page 22 Shortlist – 3 Based on DM I and Water requirement Decision Matrix 2 Very high High Medium Low Very High 2, Very High 0 Very High 0 Very High 0 Very High, 3 Very High, 2 High 0 High 0 Very High, 3 High, 3 High, 1 Medium 0 Very High 13 High 13 Medium 54 Very Low 184 waste Water > =3 MLD >=2 to <3 MLD >=1 to <2 MLD < 1 MLD 12.01.2017 Low No:184 High No: 17 Medium No:54 Very High No:23 Page 23 12.01.2017 Page 24 Shortlist – 4 Based on DM 2 and ZM list Decision Matrix 3 Very high High Medium Low ZM List ZM list Very High Very High, 10 Very High, 4 High, 9 Medium, 5 High, 13 High, 13 Medium, 45 Very low, 179 ZM List Low Very Low /Low No: 179 High No: 35 Medium No:50 Very High No: 14 Page 25 12.01.2017 Page 26 Shortlist – 5 Based on DM 3 and Biodegradability Decision Matrix 4 Very high High Medium Low Biodegradabili ty No Very High Yes Low Very High 3 Very High 5 High, 0 Medium, 0 Very High, 11 High, 30 Medium, 50 Very low, 179 Low No: 179 High No: 30 Medium No: 50 Very High No: 19 Page 27 12.01.2017 Page 28 Feedback from APIIC and APPCB • The approach and methodology for short listing of industries and the above short list was shared with APIIC and APPCB. APIIC has suggested removing some of the industrial parks as given below from the priority because of the nature of industries and working conditions. • • • • • IP Tada Kattedan AN Kannuru JAN Vijayawada IE Vizaganagaram APIIC has also suggested including the following industrial parks in the shortlist: • • • IP Kurnool-ph 1 & ph 3 APIIC Prodattur. IP Vakalapudi. 12.01.2017 Page 29 Feedback from APIIC and APPCB Final Shortlist of IPs Requiring CETPs • The final shortlist of IPs that require CETPs on immediate priority, which have been shortlisted based on the APIIC and APPCB feedback are: • IP Gajualamandyam • GC-Ongole • IDA Rampur • IP Pydabhimavaram • IDA Kadapa During IEID, • GC Hindupur and • IP Vakkalpudi 12.01.2017 Page 30 Future Actions Conducting stakeholders meetings with officials of APIIC, APPCB, Industry Associations, representative from Individual Industries and Experts from different Organizations/Sectors Initiating further feasibility studies to arrive the base level/actual requirement/need for the CETPs in the old Industrial Parks and Bid-process management for CETP for participating industrial parks The current study also gives an approach for prioritizing industrial parks not only for CETPs, but also such analysis can be done for prioritizing IPs requiring solid waste management, air pollution, other common facilities etc., for the industrial parks. 12.01.2017 Page 31 Thank you 12.01.2017 Page 32
© Copyright 2024