Document 72915

Marijke J. van der Wal
Feral Children and the Origin of Language
Debate: the Case of the Puella Trans- Isalana
or the Kranenburg Girl (1717)
La parole distingue I'homme entre les animaux:
le langage distingue les nations entre elles; on ne
connoit d'ol! est un homme qu'après qu'il a
parlé.
(J.J. Rousseau, Essai sur ['origine des [angues,
ed. eh. Porset, Paris 1969: 26; p.1 of Essai)
1.
Introduction
When, at the beginning of the seventeenth century, the brilliant young scholar
Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) presented his early linguistic ideas, he did not fail
to give his view on the origin of language.l He maintained that both languages
and nation states, the two bonds ofhuman society, we re bom at the same time.
Language was a human product, resulting from the need to have a language;
the possibility of a divine gift is not even mentioned. Grotius was not the only
one at the time who discussed the origin of language and his view on the matter was not new. The view that language is a product of human ingenuity and
related to the development of societies is found as early as in Plato' s Protagoras. The origin of language debate, in which Grotius was involved, had been
going on for centuries, and interest in the subject did not wane in the eighteenth century.
1)
These ideas are to be found in his Latin treatise Parallelon ReTUrn Publicarurn. Cf. Van der
Wal (1997) and Van der Wal (fortheaming).
G. HafJler, P. Sehmitter (Hrsg.): Spraehdiskussion und Besehreibung von Spraehen im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert, 151-161
"'Copyright 1999 by Nodus Publikationen, Münster. ISBN 3-89323-132-3.
Marijke
J. van der Wal
In the eighteenth century, the origin of language question was strongly
linked with other 'origin of' questions, examined in contemporary philosophical publications such as Condillac' s Essai sur l' Origine des Connaissances
Humaines (1746) and Rousseau's Discours sur ['Origine de ['Inégalité parmi
[es Hommes (1754).2 It was against this general background and after publication of Johann Peter Süssmilch's Versuch eines Beweises, dass die erste Sprache ihren Ursprung nicht vom Menschen, sondern allein vom Schöpfer erhalten
habe (1766) that in 1769 the Berlin Academy invited schol ars to submit their
essays dealing with the question "En supposant les hommes abandonnés à leurs
facultés naturelles, sont-ils en état d'inventer le langage?"3 Apart from Johann
Gottfried Herder's prize-winning essay, others were submitted, most of which
remained unpublished. In her stimulating paper presented at ICHoLS VII, Professor Gerda Hassler focussed on the prize topics of the Berlin Academy,
quoting extensively from the rich unpublished material. It was a quotation from
an essay written in Latin that struck me in particular (cf. Hassler 1996). The
(unknown) author of the manuscript4 referred to several cases of children who
had lived in isolation for a long time and managed to survive. After having
listed five boys (a boy found among wolves in Hesse and another one found in
Wetterau, both in the fourteenth century, a boy caught among wild sheep in
Ireland and another one discovered living among bears in the woods on the
border of Lithuania and Poland, both in the seventeenth century, and an eighteenth-century instanee of a boy found near Hameln),5 he describes the case of
a girl as follows: puella insuper in silva Granenburgensi prope Zwollam provinciae Ultrajectinae oppidum a rusticis capta anno 1717 'a girl who was
caught by farmers in the Kranenburg wood near the town of Zwolle in the
province of Overijssel in 1717' .6 This girl, discovered in the eastern part of the
2)
The second part of Condillac's Essai, titled "du langage et de la méthode", is largely devoted
to the origin and development of language (cf. Condillac 1973: 193-289, 193-267 in particular). The relevanee of Condillac's publication in the origin of language debate is convincingly
demonstrated in Aarsleff (1982).
3)
This prize topic, set for 1771, was further specified as follows: "Et par quels moyens parviendront-ils d'eux-mêmes à eette invention? On demanderoit une hypothèse qui expliquàt la
chose clairement, et qui satisfit à toutes les difficultés".
4)
Manuscript I 666, Archiv der Berlin-Brandenburgischen
5)
Cf. the Latin quotation: "[ ... ] puer in Hassio inter Iupos repertus anno 1344; alius item annorum 12; eodem anno inventus in Weteravia; alius annorum 16 in Hibernia inter oves silvestres deprehensus circa dimidium seeuli XVII; alius novennis inter ursos correptus in LituanoProdnenzsibus [sic! Lituano-Grodnenzsibus M.v.d.W] silvis anno 1662; alius prope Hameliam
inventus hoc ipso saeculo". The last example, the boy captured in Hameln, a town near Hanover, in 1724, is known as wild Peter of Hanover. For more information on the latter cf. Tinland (1968: 67-68).
6)
The name of the wood "Granenburgensi" is not correct: the "G" is either a transcription mistake for "C" or a mistake made by the unknown author. It may be observed that the author
adds one more female case to his list: a girl found near Chàlons (sur Saöne) ("puella etiam,
quam omnes novunt non multis ab hinc annis prope Cabilonum fuisse inventam"). She was
caught in 1731 and became known as Mademoiselle Marie-Angélique Le Blanc (cf. Tinland
1968: 68-71).
- 152 -
Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Feral Children
and the Origin of Language Debate: the Case of the Puella Trans-Isalana
(1717)
Netherlands, appears to be a female equivalent of her male predecessors, all
so-called feral children, in which eighteenth-century authors were particularly
interested. 7 These children, abandoned at an early age and discovered leading
an isolated existence in the wild, were supposed to reveal the original state of
man and his abilities.
It goes without saying that the feral children or 'wolf children' were interesting within the context of the debate on the origin of language too. They
could be expected to serve as evidence for the original pre-linguistic state of
man and possibly for the origin and development of language as wel1.8 It has
yet to be established if they did indeed play such a major role in the contemporary linguistic discussion. I must note that in most cases there is a serious lack
of information about these children and that extensive reports such as those on
Victor of Aveyron, a wolf child discovered in 1799, are exceptionaI.9 It is not
surprising, therefore, that the history of the Dutch girl is still to a large extent
unknown. In order to remedy this situation, I have traeed down the details of
this case, which will be presented in the sectiöns 2 and 3.10 Apart from being
referred to in the contest manuscript, the so-called Puella Trans-Isalana or the
Kranenburg girl must have figured in several eighteenth-century publications,
three of which I will examine more closely in section 4.
2.
Details of the case: two periodicals
If a feral child really was discovered in the Netherlands in 1717, it must have
been a remarkable news item which could not pass unnoticed. Indeed, the discovery drew the attention of the press, more precisely of the Mercure historique et politique, a French periodical, published by the brothers Van Dole in
the Hague. According to its subtitle, this periodical aimed at giving information on Europe, on royal events and intrigues and on all kind of curious things.
In the Mercure of January 1718 a report on a heavy storm with serious flood-
7)
Rousseau, for instanee, mentions four instanees in his Discours sur I 'Origine de I'Inégalité: the
wolf-child of Hesse, a bear-child of 1694, Peter of Hanover and two savages from the Pyrenees (Rousseau 1964: 134; 196 and Maison 1972: 38).
8)
Schreyer (1994: 73) points oU! that also the babbling of babies and the communication of the
deaf and dumb were "handy analogues of the unobserved and perhaps unobservable, speechless
savage that was natura1 man". In a yet unpublished manuscript on eighteenth-century language
theories Schreyer devotes a chapter to "feral man as evidence of a natural origin of language".
When the present article was almost ready for publication, 1 received this chapter in which
special attention is paid to the Lithuanian bear children, wild Peter of Hanover, Mademoiselle
Le Blanc and Victor of Aveyron.
9)
For more information about Victor of Aveyron, cf. Tinland (1968: 71-78). For the contemporary reports, cf. Hard (1962) and Maison (1972).
10) 1 am very grateful to Mr. W.A. Huijsmans of the Municipal Archive of Zwolle, who was most
helpful and gave some vital information on the Kranenburg gir!. I would also like to thank Ms.
Cathy Jager and Mr. H. Bordewijk of the Public Records Office of Overijssel for their useful
suggestions .
- 153 -
Marijke
J. van der Wal
ing, is followed by a letter dated 15 January and written from the town of
Zwolle. It is said to comprise "un fait assez extra ordinaire".
A girl, about eighteen years old, who was considered to be a savage ("qui
peut passer pour une Sauvage"), had been found in a wood near Kranenburg.ll
The farmers who had discovered her, caught her and brought her into Zwolle,
where the people were very keen to see this nine days' wonder. The girl was
nearly all naked; she had a dark and rough skin and had lived on grass and
leaves. She did speak, but na one was able to understand what she said ("Elle
parle, mais on n'entend rien à son jargon"). The 'reporter' concludes that
more of her amazing story may be revealed if she learns to speak our language. The report ends with the remark that the magistrate of Zwolle had
placed the girl into the care of alocal woman.
The Mercure undoubtedly had bath Dutch and foreign readers. The news
spread quickly and became known in Germany too. The Sammlung von Naturund Medicin- Wie auch hierzu gehoerigen Kunst- und Literatur-Geschichten of
January 1718 includes an article bearing the title "Von einem vermeyntlich
wilden Maegdlein in Holland" (pp. 546-550). This more or less scientific periodical presents the story of the "Maegdlein" not just as an interesting news
item but as part of a scholarly discus sion about the question "ob es ausser dem
ordentlichen Geschlechte der Menschen auch einige andere Gattungen von
selbigen gebe, die entweder in den grossen Wildnissen, als Wald-menschen
oder Satyri oder Sylvani, ader in See- Tiefen, als Meer-menschen, oder anderwaerts, lebten" (546). It is stressed that possibly a new example could be
added to the list of savage people. The information on this new case came from
Zwolle and is almost identical to the previous report in the Mercure. The description of the girl' s language ability is very similar too: "sie redet zw ar/ aber
stammlend/ und weisz kein Mensch/ was es heissen soll" .
The Sammlungen edition of January 1718, which was not published before
1719 (i.e. later than the Mercure), also covers the follow-up of the extraordinary story, offering additional details. The girl is said to have been kidnapped
at the age of sixteen months in Antwerp on 5 May 1700 and her discovery in
the Kranenburg wood is dated August 1717. According to the Sammlungen,
reports in Dutch newspapers had drawn the attention of the girl' s mother in
Antwerp, who at last found her lost daughter in Zwolle. The editor of the
Sammlungen concludes that the girl may not be an instance of a truly wild human being. Since she had not been found in the company of animais, she could
not be compared with, for example, the seventeenth-century Irish sheep boy,
who had lived among wild sheep from a very early age on and had adapted
11) Cranenburg or Cranenberg (in the eighteenth-century orthography) was the name of a manor.
The second part of the latter name (-berg 'mountain') possibly explains why a mountain is
mentioned in some of the reports (cf. "dans une Montagne" in the Mercure).
- 154 -
Feral Children
and the Origin of Language Debate: the Case of the Puella Trans-Isalana
(1717)
himself to his companions in such a way that he even bleated and ate only
grass and hay. 12
3.
Other sources: pamphlets printed and distributed in Antwerp
More details, such as the name of the girl, Anna Maria Jennaert or Gennaert,
are disclosed in other contemporary sources, two Dutch pamphlets, both printed in Antwerp, one by the widow of the printer Petrus Jacobs, the other by the
printer Cornelis van den Bruek.13 The readers of the first, undated pamphlet,
Cort verhael van de geboorte neminghe ende vindinghe van Anna Maria Jennaert (Short story of the birth, kidnapping and discovery of Anna Maria Jennaert) learn that a girl by the name of Anna Maria Jennaert, daughter of Joannes Jennaert and Anna du Chatel, was bom in Antwerp on 18 October 1698.
She was very beautiful and had a few distinctive marks such as two toes of her
left foot grown together, a dimple in her chin and a scar on her left eyebrow.
Being one and a half years old, she was kidnapped. Although her parents went
to great lengths to find her and even put a notice in a newspaper, their efforts
did not lead to any information about the whereabouts of their child.
In the pamphlet, the story of the girl' s discovery differs at some points
from the reports in the periodicals. The place of discovery, for instance, is described in more detail.I4 Moreover , the name of the Amsterdam Gazette is
mentioned, the Dutch newspaper which published the report on her discovery
and so revealed the girl' s existence to her relatives. We also learn that the
magistrate of Antwerp checked the information with their colleagues in Zwolle
before the girl' s mother left Antwerp on 16 March 1718. The re sult was satisfactory: upon her arrival at Zwolle, on 22 March, she is said to have recognized the distinctive marks of her lost child on the Kranenburg gir!.
Some information is given on the mental and physical state of the gir!. She
needed not only time to get used to human food, but she was also particularly
fond of salad and other green vegetables. Because of her lacking linguistic
skills - she stammered only meaningless, inarticulate words - it was assumed
that she had lived alone in the wood (cf. page 4 of the undated pamphlet). On
several occasions she showed good common sense: on their journey back to
12)
The Dutch doctor Nicolaes Tulp (1593-1674)
(Cf. Tulp 1991: 363-366).
investigated the Irish sheep boy in Amsterdam
13) The first pamphlet is to be found in the University Library of Leiden (shelf-mark 13725), the
second one in the Niedersächsisches Staatsarchiv Gättingen (shelf-mark 6460 OSA). I am
grateful to Dr. P. Verkruysse who provided a xerox of the latter one at the time that I needed it
most urgently. I also thank Dr. K. Bostoen for giving the bibliographical clue which led to the
second pamphlet.
14) Cf.: "[ ... ) de Heerelijckheyt van Craenenborgh ontrent een uer van de Stadt Swol [... ) in een
bosch, den wekken in de ronde groot is een ure en half" [the manor of Craenenborgh, at the
distance of one hour from the town of Zwolle, in a wood, which has a circumference of one
and a half hour (walking»).
- 155 -
Marijke
J. van der Wal
Antwerp, for instance, she asked, by means of gestures, which way they had
to take at a fork in the road (cf. page 8 of the undated pamphlet). Her modesty
when changing clothes is particularly stressed; it is seen as a characteristic of a
real human being. Af ter several months her black colour changed and her skin
became softer. She leamt to bow and kiss and did the things she was indicated
to do. All these facts led the author of the first pamphlet to the conclusion that
she proved to be able to leam - and I would add: therefore proved to be a reasonable human being.
In the other pamphlet, published in 1721, even more details are to be
found, such as information about the progress that the girl made. According to
this source, she leamt spinning and spoke a few words (cf. page 12 and 13 respectively). To convince the reader of the veracity of the case, particular evidence is brought forward: both the notice about the kidnapping as it was put in
the Antwerpse Posttydinge of 13 May 1700 and a letter from the magistrate of
Zwolle to the magistrate of Antwerp are printed in full in the pamphlet.15
The two pamphlets are the most detailed sources so far. I must note that
the undated pamphlet shows some elements which go beyond the characteristics of a news report. On the front page it is stated that Anna Maria Jennaert
had been lost for seventeen and a half years during which time she was nourished in the wildemess through the miraculous providence of GOd.16 Her parents are introduced as faithful Roman Catholics. Her mother, who used to go
to mass every day, was said to have commended her lost daughter to God and
Saint Anna, the saint after whom both she and her daughter had been named.
The discovery of the lost girl would have taken place on the feast-day of Saint
Anna in July 1717 and the mother's arrival in Zwolle on 22 March, the feastday of Saint Joachim, Saint Anna's husband. Moreover, the girl must have
been mysteriously taught the Roman Catholic faith, since she made the sign of
the cross whenever she ate something. Finally, the pamphlet ends with the
author' s belief that both God and Saint Anna saved Anna Maria Jennaert.
The religious elements in this pamphlet, which lack altogether in the one of
1721, give the impression of a medieval miracle story. The reports on other
feral children likewise often show a mixture of historical facts and myth,
which has raised doubt about the authenticity of the cases described . Knowing
this, we may wonder whether the story of the Kranenburg girl may be taken on
trust. However, in this case, evidence is to be found in the municipal archives
of Zwolle which reveal that on 6 February 1718 a certain widow van Orten
received 31 guilders and 18 pence ("stuivers"), i.e. 27 guilders for lodging the
woman (the "vrouw-mensch") that had been found in the Kranenburg wood
and 4 guilders and 18 pence for her cJothing and underwear. The widow van
15) So far, I have not had the opportunity to check this evidence in the Municipal Archives of
Antwerp, where, if anywhere, the letter and notice should be found.
16) Cf.: "Verloren 17. jaeren an half, en gespyst in de wildernisse door de wonderlijcke voorsienigheyt Godts den wekken segt: Overpeyst de raeven want sy en saeyen nochte maeyen, sy
en hebben noch hutteken nochte schuere ende Godt spyst hun hoe veel meer zyt gylieden.
Lucae cap. 12. v. 24."
- 156 -
Feral Children and the Origin of Language Debate: the Case of the PueHa Trans-Isalana
(1717)
Orten lived in a house by the "Ossenmarkt" (Ox Market), where she is known
to have conducted a modest lodging-house. On 29 March the magistrate paid
her again 7 guilders for the last seven weeks of the girl' s stay.l7 It is worth
noting that this date fits in with the date of arrival of the girl' s mother on 22
March. The financial data from the archives thus prove beyond doubt the historical reality of the Kranenburg gir!.
4.
Scientific interest in the Puella Trans-Isalana
The editor of the Sammlungen doubted whether the Kranenburg girl was an instance of a wild human being, since she had not lived among animaIs. Other
scholars and scientists did not share this point of view. Long -term isolation
was a sufficient criterion to identify the girl as a feral child.18 Consequently, in
several eighteenth-century publications the Kranenburg girl is considered as an
instance of the 'wild man' or homo ferus. Three examples will ilIustrate this.
In a Latin treatise on the natural lonely state of people who are reared
among wild animaIs, De Hominum interferas educatorum statu naturali solitario, written by H. C. Koenig and published in Hanover in 1730, the "puella in
silva Cranenburgensi a rusticis capta" is one of the cases described. The author
relies on both the Mercure and the Sammlungen and gives a fairly accurate
survey of the report from the Sammlungen, without any further details. He also
discusses the discovery of two boys in 1661 in "sylvis Grodnensibus" who had
lived among bears and afterwards proved unable to leam the Polish language.19
The Puella Trans- Isalana was also known to the taxonomy expert Carolus
Linnaeus (1707-1778). In the early editions of his Systema Naturae (first edition 1735) Linnaeus classified humans as one species, characterized as "Homo.
Nosce te ipsum", with four variations, e.g. the white European, the red American, the brown Asian and the black African. In later editions the distinction
between homo sapiens and homo ferus is added.20 Linnaeus' homo ferus was
four-footed (tetrapus), mute (mutus) and hairy (hirsutus). To the six examples
listed in the tenth edition of 1758, three more are added in the twelfth edition
17) Cf. the Municipal Archives of Zwolle, monthly accounts of 1718, pages 5 and 35 (number
AAZOI-2046), and the two receipts (AAZOI-3197). I owe this information to Mr. W.A.
Huijsmans (Municipal Archives of Zwolle).
18) Both criteria are accepted in twentieth-century psychological literature, in which three main
types of feral children are distinguished: the child in confinement, the child among animals and
the child in isolation (Maison 1972: 61).
19) On pages 61 and 62 Koenig gives a summary from the Sammlungen from which the girl's characteristic "nichts redend" fails. Furthermore, the text differs at some minor points from the
original version. For the bear-children cf. Koenig (1730: section 7, pp 10-lI). One of the bear
children is also mentioned by the author of the Latin prize essay (cf. footnote 5), who refers to
Koenig for more information.
20) The tenth edition of 1758 (Stockholm: Laurentius Salvius) is the first edition that shows this
distinction, not yet made in the ninth edition (Leiden: Theodorus Haak 1756).
- 157 -
Marijke
J. van der Wal
of 1766, among which the Dutch Puella.21 It is clear that feral children are part
of Linnaeus' system of nature. The biologist avant la leUre Johann Christian
Daniel von Schreber (1739-1810) goes beyond this by asking whether the feral
children could give any evidence as to the original state of man.
A few years after the contest of the Berlin Academy, von Schreber raised
the following question in his Die Säugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur
(1774):22
Wie ist aber der natüriiche Zustand des Menschen beschaffen? Ist derselbe [ ) van
Natur wild? Vierfüssig, mit Haaren bedeekt, ohne Sprache und Vernunft,
[ ) [bald
M.v.d.W.).
That very picture of misery, von Schreber maintains, has been given on the
evidence of wolf children. It is therefore important, he argues, to pay attention
to these unhappy creatures and their experiences. In his description of ten
cases, among which we find the Kranenburg girl, von Schreber goes into the
language abilities of the children. The second Lithuanian bear-child of 1694,
"[ ... ] hat wenig Merkmale der Vernunft, keine Sprache, auch nicht einmahl
eine menschliche Stimme gehabt [... ] auch endlich, wiewoW mit heiserer und
nicht sehr menschlicher Stimme, reden gelernt" (pp. 32-33). The Irish sheepchild of 1672 "[hat] nicht geredet, sondern wie die Schaafe geblöcket". The
boy from Hanover of 1724 had a very thick, wrongly shaped tongue; "Um deswillen war er sprachlos; doch lallte er, wenn er beleidigt wurde". He was
educated in London and learnt so much "dass er die nöthigsten Dinge in englischer Sprache fordern konnte" (p. 35). The Sogny girl (Champagne) of 1731,
was "sprachlos", "lernte die französische Sprache, wobey offenbar ward, dass
es ihr an Verstande nicht fehlte" (p. 36). We already know from other sources
that at her discovery the Puel1a Trans-Isalana stammered and spoke unintel1igible words. According to von Schreber, she had considerably improved: half
a year later she understood the signs given to her and she "[hat] sich Mühe
gegeben zu reden, auch zur Arbeit gewöhnt, wie sie denn sehr gut spinnen
gelernt hat". For this information von Schreber must have relied on the pamphlet of 1721, the only source known so far that mentions her spinning activity
and her ability to speak words.
The question whether the feral children were evidence for the original prelinguistic state of man, does not remain uminswered. Von Schreber concludes
21) The six previous examples are the "Juvenis ursinus Lithuanus 1661, Juvenis lupinus Hessensis
1544, Juvenis ovinus Hibernus. Tulp. obs. IV. 9., Juvenis Hanoveranus, Pueri Pyrenaici 1719,
Johannes Leodicensis Boerhavii". The three added in Linnaeus (1766: 28) are the "Juvenis bovinus Bambergensis. Camerar., the Puella Transilana (Puella Transisalana) 1717 and the Puella
Campanica 1731". Linnaeus sources were Tulp, Camerarius and Boerhaave. The addition
"Boerhaavii" in the case of Jean of Liege may indicate that Linnaeus got this example from
Hermannus Boerhaave whom he came to know weIl during his stay in the Netherlands. Cf.
Tinland (1968: 63-64) for more information about Jean of Liege. Tinland (1968: 61) wrongly
assumes that Linnaeus' list of feral children is the first one to be found.
22) 1 only had the edition of 1847 at my disposal. This edition, with the introduction
probably an unchanged reprint of the edition of 1774.
- 158 -
of 1774, is
Feral Children
and the Origin af Language Debate: the Case afthe
Puella Trans-Isalana
(1717)
that the instances of the deprived children cannot shed light on the original,
natural state of man and that their lack of speech, for instance, could be the
result of isolation. Some of the feral children learnt to speak later and others
would have learnt to do so "wenn es die Beschaffenheit der Werkzeuge, oder
der Kräfte ihrer Seele verstattet hätte" (Von Schreber 1774: 37). These children and their inadequacies, therefore, could not prove the imperfection of man
in his original state. Von Schreber, not unlike many contemporaries and predecessors, stresses the relationship between language and society: "Die
Sprache ist eine Folge der Gesellschaft. Wenn man Kinder mit einander aufwachsen lassen woIlte, ohne ihnen eine Sprache beyzubringen; so würden sie
ohnfehlbar selbst eine erfinden" (page 36, footnote q). Man's linguistic ability
is beyond doubt.
5.
Conclusion
In the contest mate rial of the BerIin Academy a mysterious reference occurred
to an event which must have been all too well-known to the eighteenth-century
contemporaries of the contestants. I have demonstrated that this was indeed the
case and I have provided both the details and the context of the Dutch wild
girI, who can, without any doubt, be ranked among better known feral children
such as Victor of Aveyron. In the eighteenth century most scholars who were
interested in the phenomenon of feral children did not focus on speech, language abilities or language acquisition. For our knowledge about the linguistic
skills of the children involved, we have to rely on scarce, accidental information. It was on the basis of that limited information that von Schreber, who did
pay attention to the linguistic aspect, drew his conclusions.23 In modern language-acquisition research the so-called maturity hypothesis plays an important
role. Whether later historical evidence such as the more extensive reports on
Victor of Aveyron provide support for this hypothesis, remains to be established. Apart from this, the historiographer of linguistics who is weIl informed
about the details and the context of the feral children issue still awaits further
exploration of the contest material in order to discover what major or minor
role this issue played in the origin of language debate within the BerIin Academy.
23)
Van Schreber's conclusion is similar to that of twentieth-century psycholagists and anthropologists, who focus in particular on the nature-nurture opposition. They maintain that the search
for human nature among 'wild' children has always proved fruitless precisely because human
nature can appear only when human existence has entered the social context. Cf. MaIson
(1972: 35): "When children are prematurely deprived of their human surroundings, either by
accident or design, or when they are abondoned in the wild and left to survive by their own
devices, they do, in fact, develop 'unnaturally'. It would be quite absurd to treat them as 'perfect examples of some earlier human stage', or as instanees of natural and therefore precultural man".
- 159 -
Marijke J. van der Wal
References
Aarsleff, Hans
1982
"Tradition of Condillac: The Problem of the Origin of Language in the Eighteenth Century and the Debate in the Berlin Academy before Herder". From
Locke to Saussure. Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History.
London: Athlone (or: Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 146-209.
Blaicher, Güntherm I Glaser, Brigitte
1994
Proceedings of the Anglistentag 1993 Eichstätt. Volume XV. Ed. by Güntherm
Blaicher, Brigitte Glaser. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de
1973
Essai sur l'origine des connaissances humaines. Ed. par Charles Porset; précédé de Jacques Derrida. L'archéologie dufrivole. Auvers-sur-Oise: Galilée.
HaBler, Gerda
1996
Handout with the paper "Diversity of Human Languages and Universals of
Thought - an Eighteenth Century Debate in the Berlin Academy". Paper at the
ICHoLS conference Oxford.
Hard, Jean Marc Gaspard
1962
Jean Marc Gaspard Itard, The Wild Boy of Aveyron. Trans!. by George &
Muriel Humphrey, with an Introduction by George Humphrey. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Koenig, H.C.
1730
De Hominum inter feras educatorum statu naturali solitario. Hanover: Holwein.
Linnaeus, Carolus
1735
Systema Naturae. Leiden: [s.n.].
Maison, Lucien
1972
Wolf Children. Including Jean Hard, The Wild Boy of Aveyron. London: NLB.
Mercure
1718
Mercure historique et politique. Mois de Janvier 1718. La Haye: van Dole.
Pamphlets
s.d.
1721
Cort verhael van de geboorte neminghe ende vindinghe van Anna Maria Jennaert. Antwerp. (University Library of Leiden, shelf-mark 13725).
Wonderlyk geval van een wilde dochter, omtrent 18 jaaren oud zynde, dewelke
is weggenomen binnen Antwerpen den 5 My 1700. Antwerp. (Niedersächsisches
Staatsarchiv Göttingen, shelf-mark 6460 OSA).
Rousseau, Jean Jacques
1964
Discours sur l'Origine, et les Fondemens de l'lnégalité parmi les hommes. Oeuvres complètes lIl. Paris: Gallimard, 109-223.
Schreber, Johann Christian Daniel von
1774 [1847] Die Säugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur. Erlangen: [s.n.].
Schreyer, Rüdiger
1994
"Deaf-mutes, feral children and savages: of analogical evidence in 18th-century
theoretical history of language". Blaicher / Glaser (1994: 70-86).
- 160 -
Feral Children and the Origin of Language Debate: the Case of the Puella Trans-Isalana (1717)
Sammlung
1718 [1719] Sammlung von Natur- und Medicin- Wie auch hierzu gehoerigen Kunst- und
Literatur-Geschichten/ So sich An. 1718 in den 3. Winter-Monaten in Schlesien
und andern Laendern begeben. etc. Winter-QuartaI1718. Breslau: Hubert.
Tinland, Franck
1968
L'Homme sauvage. Homo ferus et homo sylvestris. De ['animal à l'homme.
Paris: Payot.
Tulp, Nicolaes
1991
Nicolaes Tulp. Leven en werk van een Amsterdams geneesheer en magistraat. 3
vols. Amsterdam: Six Art Promotion.
Wal, Marijke J. van der
1997
"Grotius' taalbeschouwing in contemporaine context". Nederlandse Taalkunde
2: 14-34.
forthc.
"Interchange or influence: Grotius' early linguistic ideas". ICHoLS VII volume,
David Cram (ed.) I Andrew Linn & Elke Nowak (co-editors).
- 161 -