1. No category

Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Immediate processing of erotic stimuli in
paedophilia and controls: a case control study
Benedikt Habermeyer1,2*, Fabrizio Esposito3, Nadja Händel2, Patrick Lemoine2, Markus Klarhöfer4, Ralph Mager1,
Volker Dittmann2, Erich Seifritz5 and Marc Graf2
Abstract
Background: Most neuroimaging studies investigating sexual arousal in paedophilia used erotic pictures together
with a blocked fMRI design and long stimulus presentation time. While this approach allows the detection of sexual
arousal, it does not enable the assessment of the immediate processing of erotically salient stimuli. Our study
aimed to identify neuronal networks related to the immediate processing of erotic stimuli in heterosexual male
paedophiles and healthy age-matched controls.
Methods: We presented erotic pictures of prepubescent children and adults in an event related fMRI-design to
eight paedophilic subjects and age-matched controls.
Results: Erotic pictures of females elicited more activation in the right temporal lobe, the right parietal lobe and
both occipital lobes and erotic pictures of children activated the right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in both groups.
An interaction of sex, age and group was present in the right anteriolateral oribitofrontal cortex.
Conclusions: Our event related study design confirmed that erotic pictures activate some of the brain regions
already known to be involved in the processing of erotic pictures when these are presented in blocks. In addition, it
revealed that erotic pictures of prepubescent children activate brain regions critical for choosing response strategies
in both groups, and that erotically salient stimuli selectively activate a brain region in paedophilic subjects that had
previously been attributed to reward and punishment, and that had been shown to be implicated in the
suppression of erotic response and deception.
Keywords: Paedophilia, Event related fMRI, Erotic stimulation
Background
Paedophilia is a matter of great public interest and often
evokes emotional discussions in mass media. It is difficult to estimate the prevalence of paedophilia as both
paedophilic offenders and victims often prefer not to
identify themselves. From surveys of the general population we know that approximately 12% of men and 17%
of women report experiencing sexual abuse in their
childhood [1]. These figures underline the potential
impact of this disease on society. According to DSM IVTR, paedophilia is defined by two main criteria: firstly
persistent sexual fantasies, urges or behaviour involving
sexual activity with prepubescent children and secondly
* Correspondence: [email protected]
1
Department of General and Social Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital,
Zürich, Switzerland
2
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
that these people have acted on these urges, or that
these urges or fantasies caused marked distress or interpersonal difficulties [2].
Findings from neuropsychological studies on paedophilia are heterogeneous. Whilst a lower IQ [3], educational difficulties [4] and a higher rate of left-handedness
[5] indicate rather generalised brain dysfunction, other
studies suggest more specific alterations like focal weaknesses in frontal-executive [6,7] and/or temporal-verbal
[8] skills or even a more deliberate response style and
greater self-monitoring in paedophilic subjects [9,10].
Furthermore revealed research on personality traits in
paedophilia various findings like impaired interpersonal
functions, impaired self-awareness, disinhibitory traits,
sociopathy and a propensity for cognitive distortions
[11]. In summary, it can be stated that the neurobiology
of paedophilia remains incomplete.
© 2013 Habermeyer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
In recent years, researchers have increasingly addressed
the neuronal underpinnings of sexual arousal in order to
better understand sexual behaviour. Stoléru et al. [12,13]
and Redouté et al. [14,15] were the first to propose a
neurophenomological model that disentangled the cognitive, emotional, motivational and physiological components
of sexual arousal. Two recently published quantitative
meta-analyses on sexual cue reactivity [16,17] underline
that distinctive subcomponents of sexual arousal can be
reliably localised by neuroimaging techniques.
Based on the fMRI results about sexual arousal in
healthy controls it was natural to transfer that approach
to paedophilic subjects in order to better understand
the cognitive and behavioural processes in paedophilia.
In heterosexual paedophilia fMRI studies have demonstrated the altered processing of erotic visual stimuli in
the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC), amygdala
and hippocampus [18]. The latter study also reports that
erotic pictures of adults induced a stronger activation of
the hypothalmus, the periaqueductal grey and the
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in healthy controls than in heterosexual paedophilic subjects. While
this study highlights differences between controls and
paedophilic subjects other studies report similar activation patterns for the respective erotic conditions. For
example Schiffer et al. [19] show that erotic pictures of
girls induced the same activation of limbic structures
such as the amygdala, the cingulate gyrus or the hippocampus in heterosexual paedophilia as erotic pictures of
women in a control group. However this study also
found an additional activation of the DLPFC in the
heterosexual paedophilic group alone. Research has also
been carried out on homosexual paedophilia. Again in
both paedophilic and control subjects, a common network relating to sexual activation was found, comprising
the occipitotemporal and prefrontal cortex [20]. However, only paedophilic subjects showed activated subcortical regions such as the thalamus, the globus pallidus
and the striatum during erotic stimulation. Another
study on homosexual paedophilia describes differential
activation of the right orbitofrontal cortex [21].
Most of the above-mentioned studies indicate that
prefrontal brain regions might be related to paedophilia,
but the results and structures involved differ from study
to study. Considering these rather heterogeneous results, the findings from a recent study by Ponseti et al.
[22] appear surprising. These authors propose an fMRI
based classification procedure for heterosexual and
homosexual non-paedophilic and paedophilic subjects
with 95% accuracy. Unlike previous studies, these authors describe activation in regions known to be involved in the processing of erotic stimuli such as the
caudate nucleus, cingulated cortex, insula, fusiform
gyrus, temporal cortex, occipital cortex, thalamus,
Page 2 of 9
amygdala and cerebellum but not in the prefrontal
cortex.
Except for the study of Walter et al. [18] all of the
above-mentioned studies that describe a prefrontal involvement in paedophilia used relatively long presentation times ranging from 19.2 - 38.5 s and blocked fMRI
designs.
One critical shortcoming of long presentation times is
that different cognitive processes, such as sustained attention or self-referential processes might also take place and
somehow interfere with the target process. Earlier fMRI
studies on sexual arousal in normal subjects showed that
with shorter presentation times of sexually arousing
pictures specific neuronal networks and brain processes
can be addressed. Static presentation for 8.75 s as used by
Moulier et al. [23] demonstrated for example that the initiation and low levels of penile tumescence are controlled
by frontal, parietal, insular and cingular cortical areas. In
accordance with these results, Ferretti et al. [24] showed
that longer presentation times (> 30 s) induce sexual
arousal and penile erection whilst shorter presentation
times (< 3 s) induce arousal without erection. A stimulation time of 5 s even allowed to distinguish specific sexual
emotional effects from more general emotional effects
[25]. A study comparing both types of fMRI-designs in the
visual processing of erotic stimuli in healthy volunteers
[26] provides strong support for the use of fast stimulation
time, suggesting an event related design. The authors
proposed that event related designs might be an alternative to blocked designs if the core interest is the detection
of networks associated with the immediate processing of
erotic stimuli.
Besides being more useful for the detection of these
networks, short presentation times also offer other potential benefits as long presentation times in paedophilia
are even more problematic than in healthy controls.
Paedophilic subjects are mostly recruited after coming
into conflict with the legal authorities as a result of their
sexual preferences and this may increase a tendency to
suppress erotic arousal or dissimulate sexual attraction
to the pictures of children presented. The latter point
has been used to explain some of the differences between
ratings of erotic salience and brain response observed in
some of the aforementioned studies [19,21]. As presentation time becomes shorter, deliberate manipulation may become more difficult and the immediate processes following
the perception of target stimuli could become visible.
In our study we aim to identify the neuronal networks
related to immediate processing of erotic stimuli in heterosexual paedophilic subjects recruited from a forensic
outpatient setting. Based on previous neuropsychological
research and recent fMRI studies we predicted a differential activation in the prefrontal cortex in paedophilic
subjects.
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
Page 3 of 9
Methods
Subjects
Behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging
data were acquired from 16 male right-handed subjects.
All participants in this study were adults. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before
participation in the study.
The subjects in the paedophilic (N = 8) group were
recruited from an outpatient cognitive behavioural
group therapy at the department of forensic psychiatry
in Basel, Switzerland. The heterosexual paedophilic subjects fulfilled DSM-IV-TR criteria for exclusive type
(attracted only to prepubescent children) not limited to
incest heterosexual paedophilia. Three of the subjects
had previously molested prepubescent children, the
other five had been convicted because of the possession
of large quantities of explicit internet child pornography. Each participant’s sexual orientation and preference for prepubescent erotic stimuli was assessed in a
clinical interview, the Multiphasic Sex Inventory (MSI)
[27] and additionally verified by the clinical record and
the court file. For all subjects, neither the interview nor
the record indicated other comorbid paraphilias. None
of the subjects had admitted paedophilia prior to the
contact with the legal authorities.
Heterosexual control subjects (N = 8) were recruited
from an advert on the University Hospital notice board.
A clinical evaluation of all subjects revealed no other
psychiatric, neurological or medical conditions. The
local Ethics Committee of the University of Basel,
Switzerland approved the study.
Stimulation and paradigm
The study design was adopted from Bühler et al. [26].
Visual stimuli were generated and displayed on a personal computer using the Neurobehavioral Systems
(NBS) software package PresentationW 12.2. Stimuli were
presented via fMRI-compatible digital video goggles
(NordicNeuroLab, Bergen, Norway).
While inside the scanner, subjects were presented with
various types of pictures in an event related design. We
presented 10 pictures from each category (erotic pictures
of boys, girls, men, women or neutral control pictures)
for 750 ms with a jittered interstimulus interval that varied randomly between 10 – 20 s in steps of full seconds
(Figure 1).
In each picture, only one person of one of the abovementioned categories was displayed in bathing clothes in
front of a plain-coloured background. All pictures showed
faces and the complete corpus. Secondary sexual characteristics were clearly visible in the pictures showing adults
but were clearly absent in the pictures depicting prepubescent children. We avoided photographs of adolescents and
applied a biological rather than a legal cut off to make the
Figure 1 FMRI paradigm. We presented erotic pictures of adults
(women/men) and children (girls/boys) interspersed with neutral
control pictures. Pictures from each category were presented for
750 ms with a jittered interstimulus interval ranging from 10–20 s.
pictures of adults easily distinguishable from those of
children. Before inclusion into the paradigm rated the
study subjects the pictures and only the pictures with the
highest ratings on a visual analogue scale were included.
Neutral pictures showed simple objects like e.g. a small
boot in front of the same background.
In order to control attention during the passive fMRI
task we used a previously applied procedure to assure
attentive observation of the presented pictures [28]:
Before the scanning procedure, subjects were instructed
to attentively observe the pictures and told that we
would check their attention by asking them to identify
the pictures after the scanning session. Immediately
after the fMRI session we presented the slides that they
had seen interspersed with similar pictures, which had
not been presented during the experiment. Subjects
then had to decide which pictures they had seen during
the fMRI stimulation.
FMRI acquisition and analysis
Images were acquired using a 3 T MRI scanner (Verio,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with
a standard radio frequency head coil. First a T1weighted high-resolution data set that covered the
whole brain was acquired using a three-dimensional
MPRAGE (magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition
gradient echo) sequence with a repetition time (TR) of
2.00, an isotropic spatial resolution of 1.0 mm3, and an
echo time (TE) of 3.4 ms. T2* weighted functional images
were recorded using echoplanar imaging with a TR of
2500 ms, an isotropic spatial resolution of 3×3×3 mm3
and a TE of 30 ms (FoV 228; matrix 76; spacing between
slices: 0.51 mm; interslice time: 69 ms). Altogether 152
volumes with 36 image slices with a thickness of 3 mm
were obtained.
Image pre-processing and statistical analysis
Image time-series were processed using the BrainVoyager
QX 2.3.0 software package (Brain Innovation, Maastricht,
The Netherlands). Pre-processing included head motion
correction, slice scan time correction, temporal high pass
filtering and removal of linear trends. Using the results of
the image registration with anatomical scans, the functional image-time series were then warped into Talairach
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
space and resampled into 3 mm isotropic voxel timeseries. Normalized images were smoothed using a 6.00
mm isotropic Gaussian kernel.
For first-level analysis, a General Linear Model (GLM)
analysis was applied with separate subject z-normalized
predictors fitted to z-normalized voxel time-courses from
all data sets. The orthogonal predictors of interest in the
design matrix were: “boys”, “girls”, “men”, “women” and
“neutral”. For second-level analysis, the GLM fits (beta
weights) were assessed in a 3-way-ANOVA with two
within subject factors (sex: female vs. male; age: child vs.
adult) and one between subject factor group (paedophilia
vs. control). We assessed the main effects of, and the
interaction between, these factors at the voxel level and
obtained maps that thresholded at the significance level of
5% (corrected for multiple comparison). To obtain this
correction, an uncorrected statistical threshold was
initially applied to each of the F-maps at p = 0.005, and a
cluster-level threshold correction procedure based on
Monte Carlo simulations [29] was applied in order to
determine the minimum cluster size below which any
activation was to be discarded. This procedure yielded a
minimum cluster size of 10 voxels (corresponding to a
minimum cluster extent of 280 mm) for the F-maps of the
interaction of all factors, 12 voxel (297 mm) for the factor
age and 19 voxels (482 mm) for the factor sex.
The anatomical labelling of active clusters was defined
on the basis of the peak voxel coordinates, using the
Talairach Daemon (www.talairach.org) [30,31].
Active clusters resulting from the voxel-level ANOVA
were further defined as Regions of Interests (ROI). Data
from those ROIs were extracted and analysed in order to
understand the direction of the effects of the ANOVA. To
that end, we calculated linear contrasts for the different
factors, i.e. sex (female > male), age (child > adult) and the
interaction of the factors (girl > woman) separately for
both groups. In order to further specify the interaction of
all factors (sex, age, group) we extracted BOLD %-signalchange from the respective ROI and averaged the BOLD
%-signal-change separately for the groups.
Results
Demographics
Sexual orientation in the control group was heterosexual
with a preference for mature women. In the paedophilia
group all subjects were heterosexual and attracted exclusively by prepubescent stimuli. The mean age of the
paedophilic subjects was 48.25 (standard deviation: 9.15)
years and mean IQ 116 (12.12). In the control groups, the
mean age was 46.25 (8.35) years and IQ 124.88 (13.91).
Student t-tests showed no significant difference between
these groups (Table 1). In the paedophilic group 75.4% of
the pictures were correctly identified immediately after
the scanning session. In the control group 77.5% of the
Page 4 of 9
Table 1 Mean age, IQ and rate of the correctly indentified
pictures (behavioural control) with standard deviation
(SD) and T-test for both groups
Paedophilia
Controls
T-test
mean
SD
mean
SD
p
Age (years)
48.25
9.15
46.25
8.38
0.35
IQ (points)
116.00
12.12
124.88
13.91
0.21
Recognized pictures (%)
74.25
22.25
77.38
14.93
0.39
None of the results reaches statistically significant differences.
pictures were correctly identified. Again a group difference was excluded by t-test.
FMRI
Voxel level ANOVA
We found a significant interaction of the factors sex, age
and group (p < 0.05, corrected) in the middle frontal
gyrus (Figure 2, Table 2). We furthermore found significant main effects for the factors sex and age outside of
the middle frontal gyrus, i. e. in brain areas that didn`t
show a significant interaction of all factors.
A significant main effect of the factor sex (female,
male) was present at a corrected threshold of p < 0.05 in
the right middle temporal gyrus, right fusiform gyrus,
right inferior and middle occipital gyrus and right parietal lobe. In the left hemisphere, the inferior occipital
gyrus was also active. We also found bilateral activation
in the cerebellum.
The factor age revealed an activation of the right
dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (p < 0.05, corrected).
For the factor group, no significant activation was
found at the latter threshold, but again this finding is restricted to brain areas that did not show a significant
interaction of all factors.
ROI analysis
The linear contrasts of these ROIs confirmed that, in
both groups, the main effect of the factor sex was based
on a higher activation due to female pictures and the
main effect of the factor age on a stronger activation for
pictures of children. ROI analysis clarified that in the
ROI that became significant for the interaction of all
factors, only paedophilic subjects showed activation in
the girl condition while controls showed a deactivation
in this condition (Figure 3A).
Event related averaging of BOLD %-signal-change for
all conditions and all groups in that ROI illustrated a
strong activation due to erotic pictures of girls in
paedophilic subjects that was absent for all other picture
conditions in both groups (Figure 3B).
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
Page 5 of 9
Figure 2 Whole brain ANOVA. Active voxels showed a main effect of the factor sex (female/male) in the right middle temporal gyrus, right
fusiform gyrus, right inferior and middle occipital gyrus and right parietal lobe. In the left hemisphere the inferior occipital gyrus displayed active
voxels (A). Furthermore we found bilateral activation in the cerebellum. The factor age (adult/child) showed an activation of the right
dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (B). In the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex a significant interaction of sex, age and group was detected
(C). Significant voxels in A-C represent effects at a corrected p-level of p < 0.05. X, Y, Z corresponds to the Tailarach coordinates.
Discussion
Visual presentation of erotic pictures has been used to
address the underpinnings of erotic stimulation in
paedophilia [19-22,28,32]. Results proved heterogeneous,
which might partially be explained by the detection of
non-specific secondary processes in blocked designs with
long stimulus presentation time.
Our study focuses on the immediate response to
erotic pictures. Like previous studies using a short
presentation time and an event-related fMRI design
[22,26,33] we also found that female erotic pictures
elicited more activation in the right temporal lobe, the
right parietal lobe, both occipital lobes and the cerebellum in both heterosexual groups. This finding indicates
that these regions respond to erotic visual stimulation
in an immediate fashion, e.g. activation can be detected
even after a short presentation time. This finding highlights that this activation seems independent from
non-specific processes such as sustained attention.
Furthermore there was no difference between BOLD
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
Page 6 of 9
Table 2 Regions that showed a significant effect in the voxel wise ANOVA
voxel level ANOVA
X
Y
Z
Side
Lobe
Structure
BA
Cluster size (mm3)
sex
51
−34
−5
R
Temporal Lobe
Middle Temporal Gyrus
21
1289
45
−17
−12
R
Temporal Lobe
Middle Temporal Gyrus
21
504
41
−42
34
R
Parietal Lobe
Supramarginal Gyrus
40
820
41
−78
−11
R
Occipital Lobe
Fusiform Gyrus
19
1510
32
−85
8
R
Occipital Lobe
Middle Occipital Gyrus
19
421
9
−94
−8
R
Occipital Lobe
Inferior Occipital Gyrus
17
6
83
−29
R
Cerebellum
−33
−90
−15
L
Occipital Lobe
−20
−86
−20
L
Cerebellum
−25
−85
−32
L
Cerebellum
age
11
57
28
R
Frontal Lobe
Superior Frontal Gyrus
9
433
sex × age × group
29
54
4
R
Frontal Lobe
Middle Frontal Gyrus
10
428
3526
773
Inferior Occipital Gyrus
18
989
340
369
X, Y, Z corresponds to the Tailarach coordinates (BA = Brodmann area; R = right, L = left).
response to female erotic pictures in both heterosexual
groups.
Pictures of children elicited a differential activation
regardless of sex in the right DMPFC. This is appears to
be a very interesting finding as a crucial role in the critical evaluation of stimuli and for the preparation of response strategies has been attributed to the DMPFC
[34]. All study subjects were well aware of the fact that
our study was about paedophilia. We would expect that
erotic pictures of children would be recognised as a
stimulus of special interest in that context. Both groups
are also likely to be aware that this condition is specifically attached to socially unaccepted sexual preference
and behaviour. These assumptions might explain why
we found a specific activation of the DMPFC in both
groups, independent from the sex of the presented
Figure 3 ROIs analysis (A). The ROI female > male contrast level for the ROIs extracted from the ANOVA of the main effect of sex
displayed a greater activation for female pictures in all active ROIs (rTL = right temporal lobe, rPL = right parietal lobe, rOL = right
occipital lobe, lOL = left occipital lobe). The child > adult contrast confirmed that the main effect of age is based on a stronger activation due
to pictures of children in both groups (rDMPFC = right dorsomedial prefrontal cortex). ROI analysis of the cluster showing an interaction of all
factors revealed a significant difference (* = p < 0.05) for the contrast girl > woman, with activation in paedphilic subjects and deactivation in
control subjects (rlOFC = right lateral orbitofrontal cortex). Event related averaging (B). BOLD %-signal-change in the rlOFC only illustrated a
strong activation due to erotic pictures of girls in paedophilia.
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
pictures. In the DMPFC these pictures are apparently
not differentiated by preferred sex or specific erotic salience but are rather perceived as a category requiring
specific attention. This assumption would nicely fit with
the findings from Walter et al. [35] indicating that activation of the DMPFC is not related to specific processes
such as the processing of erotic content, but rather to
more general processes like attention. In line with our
findings, Ponseti et al. reported [33] that the medial
orbitofrontal cortex showed a stronger response to
erotic pictures than neutral pictures, but this response
was also independent from individual sexual preference,
as it was present in heterosexual male subjects with both
pictures of male and female erotic stimuli. In contrast to
earlier studies showing a group effect and a different activation pattern in the prefrontal cortex after presentation of erotic pictures of children, our findings indicate
that in the context of immediate processing of visual
erotic stimuli a considerable overlap in the processing of
these stimuli is present. Considering that both groups
rely on the same neuronal stimulus evaluation and response preparation networks, this finding seems rather
less surprising.
In contrast to the earlier studies that presented pictures
for more than 30 s, we focus on the immediate response
to visual stimuli. Many of the previous studies were
conducted with forensic inpatients while we only included
outpatients and most of our paedophilic study group were
convicted due to their consumption of illegal internet
pornography. Other studies [36,37] already demonstrated
that social functioning and neurocognitive capabilities are
apparently better in these subjects than in forensic inpatients with hands-on delinquency. In this context it has to
be stressed that the IQ of the paedophilic participants can
be considered extremely high especially in view of the
already mentioned findings from Cantor et al. [3]. Hence
we cannot exclude that selection of the study subjects
contributed to our findings and that the generalisability of
our results might be limited.
Brain response in the right lateral oribitofrontal cortex
(OFC) was shown to interact with the factors sex, preferred age and group. Mean group betas and event related
averaging confirmed a specific activation of the right lateral OFC due to erotic pictures of prepubescent girls in
heterosexual paedophilic subjects only whereas all other
conditions in the paedophilic group and all conditions in
the control group displayed a deactivation of the lateral
OFC. Further support for a deviant activation in the right
lateral OFC can be found in an fMRI study by Walter
et al. [18] that revealed a reduced activation for nude stimuli of female adults in paedophilic subjects.
FMRI research has already confirmed that OFC can be
activated by visual inputs [38]. According to Kringelbach
et al. [39] the OFC is a nexus for sensory integration.
Page 7 of 9
Phillips et al. [40] stated that OFC is related to the identification of the emotional significance of a stimulus and
to the production of affective states in response to that
stimulus. These authors furthermore suggested that,
together with the amygdala, insula, ventral striatum and
ventral anterior cingulated, the OFC is also involved in
the automatic regulation of emotional responses. Hence,
different processes such as the modulation of autonomic
reactions, learning, prediction, decision making and
emotional and reward-related behaviours are processed
in the OFC. According to an fMRI study by Sescousse
et al. [41] the anterior part of the lateral OFC responds
more strongly to more abstract rewards such as monetary gain, while the posterior lateral OFC responds more
strongly to more basic rewards, for example erotic
stimulation. These findings were in line with a study by
Kringelbach and Rolls [42] describing a posterior anterior
distribution of primary (e.g. sexual stimulation) and more
abstract secondary (monetary gain) reinforcers. They suggested that the anterior part of the lateral OFC is considered to be a more recent structure, phylogentically
speaking, and might therefore be related to the processing
of more abstract reinforcers like money.
Findings from our study underline the notion that the
OFC plays a critical role in evaluating reinforcers that
might provoke behavioural changes [42,43]. This is even
more interesting, as it has been shown that the anterior
lateral OFC responds more to punishment while the anterior medial part of the OFC responds to reward
[44,45]. In line with this idea, the specific group effect in
the right lateral OFC might indicate that the specific
emotional significance of the stimuli was only detected
in paedophilic subjects. Erotic pictures of children provoked a brain response resembling that of punishment
in paedophilic subjects. According to the literature, the
right anterior lateral OFC is not only associated with
punishment but also with cues indicating a behavioural
shift. This significance for behavioural adoption has been
highlighted in recent reviews on the OFC [39,43,46].
This is interesting as healthy controls have demonstrated
that the lateral OFC became active when subjects tried
to suppress erotic responses to visual erotic stimulation
[47] or in deception [48]. Our results would therefore
indicate that immediately after the presentation of erotic
pictures of children, a brain region known to be involved in
evaluating emotional salience became active in paedophilic
subjects. This activation might be related not only to the
regulation of emotional states or autonomic responses but
also to behavioural changes like suppression or deception
of emotional responses.
The findings from our study point to a network perspective of the immediate processing of visual erotic stimulation. This notion would be in line with the so-called
orbital and medial prefrontal cortex [49]. In this network
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
two likely interacting systems became active or inactive
while processing the visual stimuli. Even after a short
presentation of visual stimuli the DMPFC showed an
increased activation in response to the target condition of
our study (erotic pictures of children). It is most likely that
this finding is related to attentional processes, which are
evoked in both study groups. We further found a specific
activation due to the respective erotic condition in the
anterior lateral OFC in paedophilic subjects. Activation in
that region might indicate evaluation of emotional salience
and the reward value of that stimulus. Furthermore this
activation might indicate the intent to modify behaviour
and to dissimulate or deceive erotic responses.
Assessing the immediate processing of erotic pictures
using fMRI might be a useful tool for probing emotional
engagement towards the presented stimuli in future studies. These results could also be therapeutically relevant as
most cognitive behavioural treatment approaches aim to
reduce cognitive distortions and the denial of the implications of paedophilic behaviours and to increase the awareness of problematic attraction to children [50] rather than
to change the sexual preference. The often-reported tendency of paedophilic subjects to dissimulate and minimise
the dramatic impact on potential victims of child abuse,
might arise from similar processes, which aim at suppressing emotional distress. Interestingly Ponseti et al. [22] did
not find such an activation in their study sample, which in
contrast to our sample deliberately stated paedophilic
sexual deviance.
Conclusion
Our fMRI study confirms the findings of previous studies concerning the processing of visual erotic stimuli.
Furthermore we were able to demonstrate that the
dorsomedial prefrontal cortex is specifically engaged in
processing erotic pictures of children regardless of the
study group. This activation appears to represent the
evaluation of relevance, which is apparently not linked
to sexual orientation per se but rather to the study context. In addition we have made some new findings regarding the immediate processing of visual erotic stimulation
in paedophilia, as we found an immediate activation of the
brain regions involved in evaluating emotional salience
and reward, and engaged in the regulation of emotional
responses. This activation might be related to the suppression or deception of erotic responses.
Abbreviations
OFC: Orbitofrontal cortex; DMPFC: Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex;
DLPFC: Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; MPRAGE: Magnetization prepared rapid
acquisistion gradient echo; GLM: General linear model, ROI: Region of
interest.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Page 8 of 9
Authors’ contributions
BH, RM, MG, VD and ES conceived and designed the study. BH, NH, RM, PL
and MK realized the study design and acquired the data. BH, FE, NH
performed data analyses. BH and FE interpreted data and wrote the
manuscript. BH, FE, NH, PL, MK, RM, VD, ES and MG contributed in the
drafting and revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All
authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Swiss National Funds grant (325130–116768).
Author details
Department of General and Social Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital,
Zürich, Switzerland. 2Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Basel,
Basel, Switzerland. 3Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of
Salerno, Baronissi, (SA), Italy. 4Department of Medical Radiology, MR-Physics,
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 5Clinic for Affective Disorders and
General Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
1
Received: 9 August 2012 Accepted: 5 March 2013
Published: 19 March 2013
References
1. Laumann E, Gagnon J, Michael R, Michaels S: The Social Organization of
Sexuallity: sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press; 1994.
2. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, 4th edn.
Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association: American Psychiatric
Association (ed.); 2000.
3. Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Robichaud LK, Christensen BK: Quantitative
reanalysis of aggregate data on IQ in sexual offenders. Psychol Bull 2005,
131:555–568.
4. Cantor JM, Kuban ME, Blak T, Klassen PE, Dickey R, Blanchard R: Grade
failure and special education placement in sexual offenders' educational
histories. Arch Sex Behav 2006, 35:743–751.
5. Cantor JM, Klassen PE, Dickey R, Christensen BK, Kuban ME, Blak T, Williams
NS, Blanchard R: Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Arch Sex
Behav 2005, 34:447–459.
6. Kruger TH, Schiffer B: Neurocognitive and personality factors in homoand heterosexual pedophiles and controls. J Sex Med 2011, 8:1650–1659.
7. Schiffer B, Vonlaufen C: Executive dysfunctions in pedophilic and
nonpedophilic child molesters. J Sex Med 2011, 8:1975–1984.
8. Joyal CC, Black DN, Dassylva B: The neuropsychology and neurology of
sexual deviance: a review and pilot study. Sex Abuse 2007, 19:155–173.
9. Suchy Y, Whittaker JW, Strassberg DS, Eastvold A: Neurocognitive
differences between pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009, 15:248–257.
10. Eastvold A, Suchy Y, Strassberg D: Executive function profiles of
pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters. J Int Neuropsychol Soc
2011, 17:295–307.
11. Cohen LJ, McGeoch PG, Watras-Gans S, Acker S, Poznansky O, Cullen K,
Itskovich Y, Galynker I: Personality impairment in male pedophiles.
J Clin Psychiatry 2002, 63:912–919.
12. Stoléru S, Gregoire MC, Gerard D, Decety J, Lafarge E, Cinotti L, Lavenne F,
Le Bars D, Vernet-Maury E, Rada H, et al: Neuroanatomical correlates of
visually evoked sexual arousal in human males. Arch Sex Behav 1999,
28:1–21.
13. Stoléru S, Redouté J, Costes N, Lavenne F, Bars DL, Dechaud H, Forest MG,
Pugeat M, Cinotti L, Pujol JF: Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in
men with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Psychiatry research 2003,
124:67–86.
14. Redouté J, Stoléru S, Gregoire MC, Costes N, Cinotti L, Lavenne F, Le Bars D,
Forest MG, Pujol JF: Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human
males. Hum Brain Mapp 2000, 11:162–177.
15. Redouté J, Stoléru S, Pugeat M, Costes N, Lavenne F, Le Bars D, Dechaud H,
Cinotti L, Pujol JF: Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in treated and
untreated hypogonadal patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005,
30:461–482.
16. Stoléru S, Fonteille V, Cornelis C, Joyal C, Moulier V: Functional
neuroimaging studies of sexual arousal and orgasm in healthy men and
women: a review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 36:1481–1509.
Habermeyer et al. BMC Psychiatry 2013, 13:88
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/88
17. Kuhn S, Gallinat J: A quantitative meta-analysis on cue-induced male
sexual arousal. J Sex Med, 8:2269–2275.
18. Walter M, Witzel J, Wiebking C, Gubka U, Rotte M, Schiltz K, Bermpohl F,
Tempelmann C, Bogerts B, Heinze HJ, et al: Pedophilia is linked to reduced
activation in hypothalamus and lateral prefrontal cortex during visual
erotic stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 2007, 62:698–701.
19. Schiffer B, Paul T, Gizewski E, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski M, Kruger
TH: Functional brain correlates of heterosexual paedophilia. Neuroimage
2008, 41:80–91.
20. Schiffer B, Krueger T, Paul T, de Greiff A, Forsting M, Leygraf N, Schedlowski
M, Gizewski E: Brain response to visual sexual stimuli in homosexual
pedophiles. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2008, 33:23–33.
21. Dressing H, Obergriesser T, Tost H, Kaumeier S, Ruf M: Braus DF:
[Homosexual pedophilia and functional networks - An fMRI case report
and literature review]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2001, 69:539–544.
22. Ponseti J, Granert O, Jansen O, Wolff S, Beier K, Neutze J, Deuschl G,
Mehdorn H, Siebner H, Bosinski H: Assessment of pedophilia using
hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012,
69:187–194.
23. Moulier V, Mouras H, Pelegrini-Issac M, Glutron D, Rouxel R, Grandjean B,
Bittoun J, Stoléru S: Neuroanatomical correlates of penile erection evoked
by photographic stimuli in human males. Neuroimage 2006, 33:689–699.
24. Ferretti A, Caulo M, Del Gratta C, Di Matteo R, Merla A, Montorsi F, Pizzella V,
Pompa P, Rigatti P, Rossini PM, et al: Dynamics of male sexual arousal:
distinct components of brain activation revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage
2005, 26:1086–1096.
25. Walter M, Bermpohl F, Mouras H, Schiltz K, Tempelmann C, Rotte M, Heinze
HJ, Bogerts B, Northoff G: Distinguishing specific sexual and general
emotional effects in fMRI-subcortical and cortical arousal during erotic
picture viewing. Neuroimage 2008, 40:1482–1494.
26. Bühler M, Vollstadt-Klein S, Klemen J, Smolka MN: Does erotic stimulus
presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs.
blocked fMRI designs. Behav Brain Funct 2008, 4:30.
27. Nichols HR, Molinder I: The Multiphasic Sex Inventory Manual. 437 Bowes
Drive, Tacoma, WA 98466, USA: Nichols and Molinder; 1984.
28. Habermeyer B, Handel N, Lemoine P, Klarhofer M, Seifritz E, Dittmann V, Graf
M: LH-RH agonists modulate amygdala response to visual sexual
stimulation: A single case fMRI study in pedophilia. Neurocase 2011.
29. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC:
Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson
Med 1995, 33:636–647.
30. Lancaster JL, Rainey LH, Summerlin JL, Freitas CS, Fox PT, Evans AC, Toga
AW, Mazziotta JC: Automated labeling of the human brain: a preliminary
report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform
method. Hum Brain Mapp 1997, 5:238–242.
31. Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L,
Kochunov PV, Nickerson D, Mikiten SA, Fox PT: Automated Talairach atlas
labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 2000, 10:120–131.
32. Schiffer B, Gizewski E, Kruger T: Reduced neuronal responsiveness to
visual sexual stimuli in a pedophile treated with a long-acting LH-RH
agonist. J Sex Med 2009, 6:892–894.
33. Ponseti J, Bosinski HA, Wolff S, Peller M, Jansen O, Mehdorn HM, Buchel C,
Siebner HR: A functional endophenotype for sexual orientation in
humans. Neuroimage 2006, 33:825–833.
34. Bermpohl F, Pascual-Leone A, Amedi A, Merabet LB, Fregni F, Gaab N, Alsop
D, Schlaug G, Northoff G: Attentional modulation of emotional stimulus
processing: an fMRI study using emotional expectancy. Hum Brain Mapp
2006, 27:662–677.
35. Walter M, Matthia C, Wiebking C, Rotte M, Tempelmann C, Bogerts B,
Heinze HJ, Northoff G: Preceding attention and the dorsomedial
prefrontal cortex: process specificity versus domain dependence.
Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30:312–326.
36. Riegel DL: Effects on boy-attracted pedosexual males of viewing boy
erotica. Arch Sex Behav 2004, 33:321–323.
37. Frei A, Erenay N, Dittmann V, Graf M: Paedophilia on the Internet–a study
of 33 convicted offenders in the Canton of Lucerne. Swiss Med Wkly 2005,
135:488–494.
38. Aharon I, Etcoff N, Ariely D, Chabris CF, O'Connor E, Breiter HC: Beautiful
faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence.
Neuron 2001, 32:537–551.
Page 9 of 9
39. Kringelbach ML: The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to
hedonic experience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6:691–702.
40. Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL, Lane R: Neurobiology of emotion
perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception.
Biol Psychiatry 2003, 54:504–514.
41. Sescousse G, Redouté J, Dreher JC: The architecture of reward value
coding in the human orbitofrontal cortex. J Neurosci 2010,
30:13095–13104.
42. Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET: The functional neuroanatomy of the human
orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology.
Prog Neurobiol 2004, 72:341–372.
43. Murray EA, O'Doherty JP, Schoenbaum G: What we know and do not
know about the functions of the orbitofrontal cortex after 20 years of
cross-species studies. J Neurosci 2007, 27:8166–8169.
44. O'Doherty J, Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET, Hornak J, Andrews C: Abstract
reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal
cortex. Nat Neurosci 2001, 4:95–102.
45. Elliott R, Agnew Z, Deakin JF: Hedonic and informational functions of the
human orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 2010, 20:198–204.
46. O'Doherty JP: Lights, camembert, action! The role of human orbitofrontal
cortex in encoding stimuli, rewards, and choices. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007,
1121:254–272.
47. Beauregard M, Levesque J, Bourgouin P: Neural correlates of conscious
self-regulation of emotion. J Neurosci 2001, 21:RC165.
48. Christ SE, Van Essen DC, Watson JM, Brubaker LE, McDermott KB: The
contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception:
evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cereb Cortex
2009, 19:1557–1566.
49. Ongur D, Price JL: The organization of networks within the orbital and
medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. Cereb Cortex 2000,
10:206–219.
50. Haywood T, Grossman L: Denial of deviant sexual arousal and
psychopathology in child molesters. Behavior Therapy 1994, 25:327–340.
doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-88
Cite this article as: Habermeyer et al.: Immediate processing of erotic
stimuli in paedophilia and controls: a case control study. BMC Psychiatry
2013 13:88.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit