POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCBS)
The BC Salmon Farmers Association has received questions about the levels of PCB’s and contaminants
in farm-raised salmon and the food chain in general. Unfortunately, there is a lot of misinformation in
the public sphere about PCBs and about PCBs in farm-raised salmon. In an eﬀort to address those
concerns we have put together this information sheet. The bottom line: farm-raised salmon is a healthy,
nutritious source of lean protein and is safe to eat.
What are polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)?
Polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, are chemicals that were used primarily in the ﬁrst half of the
last century. PCBs have been shown to cause environmental toxicity and, in high enough doses,
can be hazardous to human health. The production of PCBs was banned by the United States in
1979 and by the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2001. Although PCBs
are still present in many of our daily meal choices, all these foods remain safe to eat, and
neither the US FDA nor Health Canada recommends any consumption limits on any foods
because of dioxins or PCBsi.
How are they in our food?
PCBs are classiﬁed as a persistent organic pollutant (POP). POPs are organic compounds that
take a long time to degrade and therefore persist in the environment. Because of this, POPs,
including PCBs have contaminated the entire food chain. At high enough levels, PCBs
bioaccumulate, meaning they accumulate in an animal’s body faster than they can be
eliminated.
What are safe levels?
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency tests animal feed for numerous chemicals and
contaminants, including PCBs. Fish meal, ﬁsh oil and complete ﬁsh feeds are tested to ensure
the safety of the feed used for farm-raised salmonii.
Differences between Species:
Many comparisons have been made between farm-raised and wild salmon PCB levels. However,
diﬀerent salmon species have diﬀerent fat contents. Since PCBs are stored in fat, that means
species with diﬀerent levels of fattiness will have diﬀerent PCB levels. In order to do a fair
comparison of PCB levels in salmon, you should compare wild and farm-raised of the same
species; wild Atlantic vs farm-raised Atlantic, for example.
POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCBS)
Direct comparison of farm-raised and wild salmon:
Concerns have been raised about the PCB levels in farm-raised salmon based on one highlypublicized study that came out in 2004. Since this time, many more studies have been done
which show PCB levels in farm-raised salmon are well within safe limits. As well, major
advancements have been made in ﬁsh feed composition which has lowered the level of PCBs in
farm-raised salmon.
A report by the World Health Organization in 2010 looked at the risks and beneﬁts of ﬁsh
consumption, including the issue of PCB and other contaminants. It found that levels of dioxins
and dioxin-like compounds (PCBs) in farm-raised and wild Atlantic salmon are very close. It
should also be noted that the levels of EPA and DHA (Omega-3 fatty acids) are much higher in
farm-raised salmon.
Source: Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on the Risks and Beneﬁts of Fish Consumption; Appendix A
iii levels
If you ate farm-raised salmon two or three times a week, you would still be far below the
set for dioxin exposure set by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives .
This report also concluded that the beneﬁts of regularly eating oily ﬁsh such as salmon far
outweigh any potential risks.
POLYCHLORINATEDBIPHENYLS (PCBS)
How does farm-raised salmon compare to other foods?
PCB levels in farm-raised Atlantic salmon are lower than many other foods most people
consume on a regular basis.
Source: http://www.aquaculture.ca/ﬁles/health-salmon.php
All of these foods are safe to eat, and neither the US FDA nor Health Canada recommends any
consumption limits on any foods because of dioxins or PCBs.
i
Health Canada PCBs Fact Sheet
CFIA National Feed Inspection Programs - Monitoring Sampling Activity – Dioxins, Furans, and Polychlorinated
Biphenyls (PCBs)
iii
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on the Risks and Beneﬁts of Fish Consumption, table 2
ii