Third decade Second thousand Ears and nose don't work e"dl exzi 1123 d"ryz'd hay g"i Feb 6-7 '15 OU Israel Center • 22 Keren HaYesod • POB 37015 • Jerusalem • (02) 560-9100 K'ISH ECHAD and ISH ECHAD As One Person and One Person. That's the translation of the title. Here's what it refers to. The Torah describes the arrival of the People of Israel to Mount Sinai. In the third month from the Exodus (Sivan), on THIS day (Rosh Chodesh), they (plural) came to the Sinai Wilderness. THEY traveled from R'fidim, THEY arrived in Midbar Sinai, THEY camped in the desert, and Israel (singular) camped opposite the mountain. Rashi's famous comment on the switch from plural verbs to singular - at Mount Sinai, the multitude of people unified to the extent that they were K'ISH ECHAD, as one person, with one heart. More than six hundred thousand men plus women and children - a soon-tobe nation of two to three million people, were like one person with cont. page 4 fh:hi zeny ...xd¨½ dÎl ¨ r© Æca¨ ¥ M o³¨pr¨ e§ miw¦¹ x¨aE § zŸ l¸ wŸ Áid¦ i©§e... ...there was thunder and lightning and a heavy cloud on the mountain... JERUSALEM in/out times for Shabbat Parshat YITRO Candles 4:42PM • Havdala 5:56PM • Rabbeinu Tam 6:30PM Pi x ParshaP Explanations further on dia dag nap jour siku päivä Last week, we asked a TU BISHVAT BRACHA RIDDLE. Here it is again, and then the answer. You have before you raisins, dried apricot, and banana chips and you plan on eating them all. Your favorite among the three is apricot. Second favorite are the banana chips. You are about to partake when you realize the problem. Apricots have priority over banana chips because of CHAVIV (you like them better). Banana chips have priority over raisins because you like them better and the brachot are different (Shulchan Aruch). Raisins have priority over apricots because of 7 Species within same bracha (Shulchan Aruch). So what do you do? Answer begins on page 16 Candles Shabbat Parshat Yitro Havdala Mishpatim-å Ranges are 11 days, Wed-Shabbat 4:42 Yerushalayim / Maale Adumim 5:56 4:48 6:02 15-25 Sh'vat • February 4-14 5:00 Aza area (Netivot, S'deirot, et al) 5:59 5:06 6:05 Earliest Talit & T'filin 5:39-5:32am 4:57 5:57 5:04 6:02 Gush Etzion Sunrise 6:31-6:22½am 4:58 Raanana / Tel Mond / Herzliya 5:57 5:04 6:03 Sof Z'man K' Sh'ma 9:11-9:08am 4:58 5:57 5:04 6:03 (Magen Avraham: 8:34-8:31am) Beit Shemesh / RBS 4:58 5:57 5:04 6:03 Sof Z'man T'fila Netanya 10:05-10:03am 4:57 5:57 5:04 6:02 (Magen Avraham: 9:35-9:32am) Modi'in / Chashmona'im 4:58 5:58 5:05 6:03 Chatzot Rehovot 11:53-11:53¼am (halachic noon) 5:04 6:04 4:58 5:58 Be'er Sheva / Otniel 12:23-12:24pm 4:42 5:57 4:48 6:03 Mincha Gedola Petach Tikva (earliest Mincha) 4:57 5:56 5:03 6:02 Ginot Shomron Plag Mincha 4:08½-4:15½pm 4:56 5:56 5:03 6:01 Gush Shiloh 5:20½-5:29¼pm 4:47 5:56 4:53 6:02 Sunset Haifa / Zichron (based on sea level: 5:15½-5:24½pm 4:58 5:57 5:04 6:03 Chevron / Kiryat Arba OU Israel and Torah Tidbits do not endorse the 4:57 5:56 5:03 6:02 political or halachic positions of its editor, columnists, Giv'at Ze'ev advertisers, nor guarantee the quality of advertised 5:00 5:59 5:06 6:05 orservices Ashkelon or products. Nor do we endorse the kashrut 4:45 5:54 4:51 6:00 of hotels, restaurants, caterers or food products that Tzfat are advertised in TT (except, of course, those under 4:59 5:58 5:05 6:03 OU-Israel hashgacha). Any "promises" made in ads are Yad Binyamin the sole responsibility of the advertisers and not that R' Tam (Jerusalem) - 6:30pm • next week: 6:36pm of OU Israel, the Israel Center or Torah Tidbits HaShem (2 names), Avraham (2 names), Yaakov (2 names) cont. from previous TTr: Reuven, Balak, Par'o, Yitro, Moshe Vayeitzei, Vayishlach, Vayeishev, Vaychi, Yitro, Vayakhel, Korach, Balak, Matot, Vayeilech - all what? The wine or in the wine In Yitro, Esther, and Divrei HaYamim Bet Honor your parents with a cup of wine Not just Parshat D'varim - Yitro & Vayakhel too Most of us appreciate the significance of scientific thought in bringing about scientific revolution, but very few are aware of the power of moral speculation in producing moral change. Our lives are but an instant - how can we relax? Restraint is meaningless unless we know precisely what it is that we are restraining. from "A Candle by Day" by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein z"l www.createspace.com/4492905 continued from the Front Page one heart, with one unified goal - the receiving of the Torah and establishing a mutual relationship with G-d, who had taken them out of Egypt. And the One Person? That refers to Yitro, (former) Midyanite priest, father-in-law of Moshe Rabeinu. One person who came to be part of that nation. The One Person for whom the sedra that contains the account of Revelation at Sinai, is named. Let's go back to the K'ISH ECHED. The people were LIKE one person but they weren't one person, they were two to three million people. When a Jew sees a gathering of at least 600,000 Jews, there is a bracha to recite. The bracha begins as most due: Baruch Ata HaShem, Elokeinu Melech HaOlam, and ends with an unexpected two-word phrase that describes one aspect of G-d - CHACHAM HARAZIM, the One who is wise to secrets. Some explain this bracha by pointing out that when people see a large multitude of people, they are overwhelmed by the massiveness of the group and fail to see the individuals who make up the group. Each person is no longer an entity unto itself, but part of a mass of humanity. Only G-d, in His infinite compacity, can distinguish each individual from the multitude. He - and only He - is CHACHAM HARAZIM, the One who knows the individual secret hearts of each person. Even though we consider it highly admirable and complimentary to the people who stood at Har Sinai K'ISH ECHAD B'LEIV ECHAD, there is a down side to that status. Except for G-d, we cannot help but lose sight of the individual as an individual, with all that that means. Even the people who are part of the large group itself, would tend to not think of themselves as individuals. We as Jews need two kinds of feelings about our commitment to G-d, Torah, and Mitzvot. We need to feel that commitment and whatever struggles and challenges that commitment entails as individuals, as a unique person and Jew. We must never forfeit our personal identity to the group. But, at the same time, we must feel a total belonging to that group, to Bnei Yisrael, to the People of Israel. Yitro shows us the way to the former mode of thinking and feeling. The united multitude of men, women, and children who stood at Sinai and entered into an eternal covenant with G-d, and a mutual relationship with Him, show us the way to the latter mode of thinking and feeling. Mathematics says that the whole is equal to the sum of its parts. Judaism says the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. but that can only be so if each part of that greater whole maintains his or her unique identity and personality. This is the dual challenge of being a Jew and of being part of Am HaShem OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 4 The Yitro 5775 issue Yitro 17th of 54 sedras; 5th of 11 in Sh'mot Written on 138 lines in a Torah, (46th) 15 Parshiyot; 4 open, 11 closed Numbers in [square brackets] are the Mitzva-count of Sefer HaChinuch AND Rambam’s Sefer HaMitzvot. A=ASEI (positive mitzva); L=LAV (prohibition). X:Y is the perek and pasuk from which the mitzva comes. 1105 words, 4022 letters - ranks 46th Kohen - First Aliya 12 p'sukim - 18:1-18 Yitro is the smallest sedra in Sh'mot [P> 75* p'sukim - ranks 47th (only 7 sedras have fewer p'sukim) *Tradition is that Yitro has 72 p'sukim, not 75. If we count DIBROT rather than p'sukim for the Aseret HaDibrot, then the number drops to 72 (from 75) and that might reconcile the difference. But not quite. Because when we read the Aseret haDibrot with TAAMEI HA'ELYON (as Dibrot), there are only 9 p'sukim/dibrot, since the first two are definitely combined. Total - 71. Yitro contains 17 of the 613 mitzvot; 3 positive and 14 prohibitions Note that 14 of the 17 mitzvot in Yitro are within the Aseret HaDibrot. That means that Ten Commandments is not really the best translation for Aseret HaDibrot. The Ten Statements might be a better rendering of Aseret HaDibrot or Aseret HaD'varim [P> X:Y (Z)] and [S> X:Y (Z)] indicate start of a parsha p'tucha or s'tuma. X:Y is Perek:Pasuk of the beginning of the parsha; (Z) is the number of p'sukim in the parsha. Yitro, Moshe's father-in-law, hears "all that has happened" to the Children of Israel and comes to Moshe with Tzipora and Moshe's (actually, Tzipora's that’s how the Torah describes them!) two sons, Gershom and Eliezer. Moshe, Aharon, and the Elders welcome Yitro with great honor. Yitro praises G-d for all that He has done for the People. 18:1 (27)] The straight reading of this portion is that Yitro heard about the Crossing of the Sea and the battle with Amalek. These are the events recorded in the previous sedra. Other commentaries point to certain textual references about Sinai and are of the opinion that Yitro came after Matan Torah, sometime during the almost one year that the People were camped near Sinai. If this is so, then we have an example of "there is no set order in the Torah's account..." and we can add the events of Sinai to the list of what Yiro "heard and came". Of course, when the Torah does not follow chronological sequence, there are reasons... sometimes we get insight into what those reasons might be. OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 5 The Yitro 5775 issue VAYICHAD YITRO, Yitro was delighted with all of the good that G-d had done for the people of Israel. That’s the “plain” meaning of the word. Rashi mentions another possible meaning of the word - of the skin breaking out in “goosebumps”, perhaps a subconscious feeling of mortification for the downfall of his former colleagues. One has to be sensitive and careful with what one says to a convert or potential convert. Levi - Second Aliya 11 p'sukim - 18:13-23 On the "following day", Yitro observes Moshe judging the People from morning until night. He offers suggestions for a more efficient system. Moshe should teach the People what G-d requires of them, and he should also handle the most difficult questions and disputes. But the bulk of the daily judging should be assigned to qualified individuals who will be in charge of groups of ten, fifty, a hundred, and a thousand people. Yitro explains that this new system will not only make things easier for Moshe, but the people too will be benefited. (This portion of the sedra definitely seems to have occurred after Matan Torah, even if you want to say that Yitro's original arrival was before.) "On the following day..." The plain meaning would be, on the day following Yitro's arrival. Rashi, however, quotes the Midrash in saying that the day was the morrow of Yom Kippur, that very first Yom Kippur when Moshe came down from the mountain with the second set of Luchot. This makes an important statement, that not only is building the Mishkan an essential part of the "getting back to life following the Golden Calf disaster" period, but so is the everyday social and civil functioning of the people. In the big picture, we see that Parshat Yitro with the main description of Matan Torah precedes Mishpatim with its mundane, everyday, down-to-earth laws. Yet at the beginning of Yitro, we find this out-of-sequence portion of the Mishpatim-related concept. And at the end of Mishpatim, we have the rest of the story of Maamad Har Sinai. So which really comes first the lofty, spiritual dimensions of Judaism, or everyday life? We can (and should) look at it as a package deal. However you look at the first part of the sedra, the story of Yitro seems to be an interruption between the events of the Exodus and the Splitting of the Sea on the one hand, and Matan Torah on the other. But it is definitely NOT an interruption - it is a prerequisite for Matan Torah. Moshe's view of the judging process, as he explains to Yitro who asks him what he's doing, is that the people come to him LIDROSH ET HA'ELOKIM, to seek out G-d. Yitro's point is that there is a lack of civility among the disputing individuals OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 6 The Yitro 5775 issue which must be handled BEFORE they can pursue Knowledge of G-d. This interlude about civil justice can teach us that good interpersonal relations allows us to really benefit from Matan Torah. Similarly, Derech Eretz Kodma LaTorah. Shlishi - Third Aliya 4 p'sukim - 18:24-27 Moshe accepts Yitro's suggestions and selects the judges. Commentaries point out that the actual qualifications of the judges that Moshe selected were more "modest" than Yitro had recommended. In theory, the very highest caliber person should be sought after as judge. In reality, we often have to settle for the best we can find in our society. Moshe sends Yitro off on his journey to Midyan (to convert his family, says Rashi). Notice that the first three Aliyot are all part of a single parsha, the parsha of Yitro (not to be confused with weekly sedra of Yitro). Pull that parsha out of the Torah for a moment (don't worry, we'll put it right back), and the next thing we read about is Israel traveling from Refidim towards Sinai. This follows smoothly from the battle with Amalek which took place in Refidim. Sequentially, the removed parsha of the Yitro episode is not missed at all. Therefore, it seems obvious that the Yitro portion is there for its lesson value alone. Which is fine, and is how we understand the EIN SEDER MUKDAM U'M'UCHAR BATORAH phenomenon. The Torah is not just going to put things out of chonological order for no good reason (as mentioned earlier). R'vi'i - Fourth Aliya 6 p'sukim - 19:1-6 Here begins the Torah reading for Shavuot morning [P> 19:1 (25)] The Torah now returns to the sequence of Y'tzi'at Mitzrayim to Matan Torah. On Rosh Chodesh Sivan (six weeks after leaving Egypt) the Children of Israel arrive at Sinai. Worth reviewing... In the third month following the Exodus, on THIS day, they (the Children of Israel) arrived at the Sinai Wilderness. Why THIS day; THAT day is how you tell a story. The Torah isn’t a once-upon-a-timea-long-time-ago story book. The Torah is a living guide for us, to be constantly rediscovered. Every day, each Jew should imagine him- or herself at Sinai receiving the Torah anew. Today we have come out of Egyptian bondage; today we stand at the foot of Mt. Sinai eagerly awaiting Divine Revelation, and today we commit ourselves to G-d and what He asks of us. Today is the first day of the rest of our lives. The words of Torah which we learn and live should never become stale. They should be in our eyes as if TODAY we have received them. We OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 7 The Yitro 5775 issue should learn Torah and do mitzvot with the freshness and enthusiasm of a first-time experience. This too fits well with the "Yitro model". The challenge: Be a true Torah Jew all your life, for as many years as G-d gives you, but have an enthusiasm that is more common to converts and Baalei T'shuva. After settling in at the foot of Mount Sinai, Moshe ascends to G-d (whatever that really means) and G-d tells him what he is to say to the women and men (sequence is intentional and based on the analysis of the terms Beit Yaakov and then Bnei Yisrael). A clear connection is made between G-d's having taken us out of Egypt and His taking us to Him as His Chosen People - with the condition that we follow Him and His Torah. It is true that a Jew is a Jew regardless of his keeping the Torah or not, but it is clear that G-d has always demanded of us that we be committed to Torah and Mitzvot in order for our relationship with Him to be mutual and actively positive from both sides. Chamishi 5th Aliya 13 p'sukim - 19:7-19 Moshe presents G-d's words to the Elders (and the People), who answer with a resounding "All that G-d says we will do". (Not yet with the famous Naaseh V'Nishma - that comes next week.) Moshe then tells the people to prepare for three days to receive the Torah. During this time, the Mountain was offlimits (to people and to animals). On the morning of the third day, the People gather at the foot of the mountain to the accompaniment of the supernatural sounds and sights of the Shofar, thunder, lightning, and smoke. G-d will speak to Moshe in such a manner that the People will be witness to this direct communication. When Moshe will speak, G-d will answer with a "voice" (and not just via a vision or spiritual telepathy - so that the people could be part of the experience). G-d tells Moshe that the People should "sanctify themselves today AND tomorrow". It is relatively easy to sanctify oneself on the day of the great miraculous events of Matan Torah. The challenge to each of us is to sanctify ourselves on the many tomorrows that follow. The days after the wondrous events... The days when our lives return to "normal". This is what being Jewish is about. Yom Kippur is special and holy. Our additional challenge is to sanctify the day after Yom Kippur. We sanctify the mundane. Therefore, there really is nothing that is actually mundane for us. OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 8 The Yitro 5775 issue Shishi - Sixth Aliya 20 p'sukim - 19:20-20:14 G-d descends onto Har Sinai (so to speak) and calls to Moshe to join Him. G-d tells Moshe to repeat the warning against approaching the mountain. Moshe then goes down to the people to tell them G-d's words. [S> 20:1 (1)] G-d (Elokim) speaks all the following things, saying... What follows is/are Aseret HaDibrot, the Ten Commandments. They are comprised of 13 p'sukim which contain 14 mitzvot of the Torah's 613. [S> 20:2 (5)] What we call the first two commandments (or sayings or statements) are combined in a single parsha of 5 p'sukim. They can be seen as two sides of the same coin. You must believe in G-d; you may not believe in other gods... Some Chumashim consider the ANOCHI pasuk and LO YIHYEH... to be a single pasuk. In Taamei HaElyon they are definitely joined into a single pasuk. The first commandment sounds like a statement by G-d - an introductory remark, perhaps, to what follows, but is viewed by Rambam, Chinuch, and others as a mitzva to believe in G-d [25, A1 20:2]. (And others do view it as an introductory statement.) The second commandment contains several prohibitions related to idolatry. Specifically, not to believe in other gods [26,L1 20:3] (this mitzva includes the prohibition of having no belief at all - atheism), not making idols [27,L2 20:4], nor bowing to them (even without believing in them) [28,L5 20:5], nor worshiping idols in any manner [29,L6 20:5]. Note that this commandment deals with both the thought and actions of Avoda Zara (idolatry). [S> 20:7 (1)] The third command- ment prohibits swearing in vain [30,L62 20:7]. This is defined as (1) swearing to the truth of something that is obviously true and well- known - e.g. that the Sun is hot; (2) to swear in denial of an obvious truth - that the Moon is made of cheese (interestingly, this is not considered a lie or a false oath, since - hopefully - everyone knows that the Moon is not made of cheese. Only when the truth of a matter is unknown do we use the term lie and false oath. A vain oath is just as serious as a false one, so this distinction is largely academic, but it emphasizes the seriousness of being flippant in regard to swearing.); (3) to swear to violate the Torah - e.g. that one will eat pork. Such an oath is immediately void since we are considered to have taken a prior oath (at Sinai) to not OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 9 The Yitro 5775 issue eat pork. Hence, the oath is in vain and is a disrespectful use of G-d's name; (4) to swear to do something that is impossible - e.g. to stay awake for a full week. The common denominator of these types of vain oaths is that they all "cheapen" the use of G-d's name and threaten the smooth functioning of society which often must rely on the seriousness of a real oath. In addition to actual vain oaths, this prohibition is considered by some authorities to include the saying of a BRACHA L'VATALA, and its partner, a BRACHA SHE-EINO TZ'RICHA. Saying G-d's name in vain is forbidden but is not considered part of this Commandment #3. It falls under one or more other isurim. [P> 20:8 (4)] Commandment #4 deals with Shabbat and contains the positive mitzva to remember the Shabbat with Kiddush [31, A155 20:8], and the prohibition of all manner of Melacha, specific categories of creative activities [32, L320 20:10]. The mitzva of ZACHOR includes saying Kiddush as Shabbat enters, and Havdala as Shabbat leaves. (Officially, K&H are said in davening as a fulfillment of the Torah command, and again with wine, in fulfillment of a Rabbinic command. It's a bit more complicated than that, but this is the basic idea.) Prohibitions of Melacha are divided into 39 categories, each of which contains other related activities, usually with the same goal. E.g., PLANTING is one of the 39 categories; watering, pruning, fertilizing all help the growth of plants and are TOLADOT of PLANTING, and are also considered Torah violations of equal seriousness to the parent melacha, Planting. Aside from these two mitzvot about Shabbat, there are three others in the Torah - last week's prohibition of T'CHUM SHABBAT, next week's positive command to abstain from melacha (the other side of the prohibition here), and Vayakhel's prohibition of courts carrying out punishments on Shabbat. [S> 20:12 (1)] The fifth com- mandment is to honor parents [33,A210 20:12]. one's Grandparents, in-laws, older (or possibly oldest) brother (maybe sister too), and teachers are included in this mitzva, but with different parameters. Honor of parents is usually considered to refer to that which one does for one's parents, in contrast to reverence (fear) of parents which include that which should not be done because it would be disrespectful. [S> 20:13 (2/11 of the pasuk)] #6 is the prohibition of MURDER [34, L289 20:13], which is considered the antithesis of Belief in G-d, since murder directly negates creation of human being in His image. [S> 20:13 (2/11)] Commandment #7 against ADULTERY [35, L347 OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 10 The Yitro 5775 issue 20:13] is the prohibition of having parsha... relations with a married woman, but as a "chapter heading" it also points to the other forbidden relations. [S> 20:14 (11/15)] specifies the [S> 20:13 (2/11)] LO TIGNOV, #8 [36,L243 20:13], which is specif- ically defined as kidnapping, but is also the category header of many mitzvot in the Torah. [S> 20:13 (5/11 of a pasuk)] #9 is the prohibition of "bearing false witness" [37,L285 20:13]. We can see in this mitzva, as well as many others, how important it is to G-d, so to speak, that we be able to function as a society. Both oaths and testimony are necessary for the establishment of TRUTH, in the absence of having direct first-hand knowledge. So much of the dealings between people involves the trust we place in each other's word, especially when backed by an oath, and in the confidence we place in the testimony of witnesses. Without these elements of our interpersonal relations, we would be incapable of functioning as a society and each of us might as well look for a cave somewhere to live as a hermit. [S> 20:14 (4/15 of a pasuk)] #10 is the prohibition of COVETING [38, L265 20:14] sums things up in that it focuses on thoughts that can lead to all types of sins. Being part of The Big 10 points to the significance of thought, where the usual focus is on deeds. The second part of this commandment is in its own prohibition of coveting one's fellow's wife, his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that is his. Sh'VII Seventh Aliya 9 p'sukim - 20:15-23 [S> 20:15 (4)] The People are awestruck by the supernatural phenomena of the Sinai experience and they keep their distance. They ask Moshe to tell them what G-d wants rather than hearing His Voice directly. After the second statement, the People panicked and asked Moshe to tell them what G-d wants, so that they would not hear "G-d's voice" directly. G-d agreed, on the condition that we listen to the word of the true prophet who speaks in G-d's name. [S> 20:19 (5)] G-d tells Moshe to remind the People that they heard G-d speak; that they shall make no graven human images (even for art) [39,L4 20:20]; they shall make an altar and offer sacrifices upon it; if the altar be of stone, its stone shall not be cut with metal tools [40,L79 20:22]. The Altar may not be approached with immodest steps [41,L80 20:23] but rather via its ramp. Maftir is last 5 p'sukim. OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 11 The Yitro 5775 issue Haftara 21 p'sukim Yeshayahu 6:1-7:6, 9:5-6 Parallel to the Torah's account of the awesome experience at Sinai, this passage from Yeshayahu describes his first awe-inspiring vision of angels proclaiming Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh. Both sedra and haftara present us with "visions" of G-d's awe, majesty, and holiness. Also, in the sedra, G-d tells us that we will be to Him a kingdom of kohanim and a holy nation. In the haftara we see a model of K'dusha (the angels), and also a glimpse of a potential Moshiach. mgpn ixac Divrei Menachem [email protected] Of course! The immediate question to ask about this week's parsha, Yitro, is why it is named after Yitro, Moshe's father-in-law? Surely a parsha that contains a description of the Revelation on Har Sinai should be titled with the star of that momentous event, namely, Moshe. And this question is compounded when we consider that Yitro was a Midianite priest, a spiritual leader of an idol-worshiping sect! According to our initial understanding of the text, Yitro was so moved by what, "Hashem had done for Moshe and Israel" how G-d divided the Red Sea and how the people successfully overcame Amalek (Rashi) - that he left Midian with Moshe's wife and children (who had been sent away) to meet Moshe. On deeper reflection, however, it appears that Yitro's insight and perception far superseded his earlier wonderment at these events. Yitro understood that G-d thrust an unwilling people out of Egypt (Sh'mot 12:39) and that He turned around a passive bunch of slaves - miraculously freed from bondage and Egypt - into an organized fighting force that did not rely on even one miracle! He understood that what Hashem had done for Moshe was to save him from certain death for failing to circumcise his son. And now a wizened non-Jew teaches Moshe that he must reunite with his family. And surprisingly it is Yitro (who apparently abandoned his heathen ways) who is the first to make a blessing to G-d for saving the Jewish people. It seems strange, but sometimes it takes a Yitro to remind us to live up to our calling, and to actualize our collective Hebrew name, "Yehudi" - to thank Hashem for his continual merciful oversight. Reason enough to name the parsha for Yitro. OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 12 The Yitro 5775 issue TU BISHVAT BRACHA RIDDLE The riddle is based on certain halachic opinions, which aren't the only opinions that exist. The riddle assumes that the rules mentioned in its presentation are the ones we follow. If that is not completely so, then the riddle might fall apart, so for the sake of the riddle, assume that the details presented are correct. Some words of introduction first. If A is greater than B, and B is greater than C, then A is greater than C. This is known as the transitive property of inequalities. Taller than, older than, bigger than, smaller than, stronger than... all are transitive. One might think that "has priority over" is also transitive, but it 'ain't necessarily so'. A well-known children's game that does not have a transitive property is Rock, Paper, Scissors. Rock beats Scissors, and scissors beats paper, but it does not follow that therefore Rock beats paper. The opposite is the case in that game. The lack of transitive property is often counter-intuitive. In our riddle, one might think that if raisins have priority over apricots, and apricots have priority over banana chips, then certainly raisins would have priority over banana chips. With raisins and apricots, only one bracha will be said. Shulchan Aruch therefore gives the honor of the bracha to one of the Species that describe Eretz Yisrael in D'varim 8:8. With raisins and banana chips, two brachot are said. The raisins will still be honored (so to speak) with a bracha. As to which bracha goes first - rather than which one gets the bracha - Shulchan Aruch says CHAVIV - whichever you like better goes first. So far, we've explained the riddle. We have not yet touched upon the answer - or shall we say, and answer. We'll do that now. The rulings as set in the posing of the riddle do not help us identify a specific order of brachot and eating. Rabbi Reuven Aberman, therefore, posited the following solution. Shulchan Aruch presents us with the Rambam's opinion, which he (Shulchan Aruch) does not accept. But he includes Rambam's opinion in Orech Chayim 211. Rambam's opinion is that regardless of same brachot, different brachot (HaEitz and HaAdama only), 7 Species or not, one makes the (first) bracha on CHAVIV, what he likes the best. And this works for our situation. Apricots first. Rambam to the rescue. But they don't. Here's a way of understanding the difference between raisins and apricots on the one hand and raisins and raisins and banana chips on the other. OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 13 The Yitro 5775 issue Vebbe Rebbe B'racha on a Newly Renovated Home Question: If I did major renovations in my home, do I recite Shehecheyanu on it? Answer: The mishna (B'rachot 54a) says that one who builds a new house or buys new "utensils" recites Shehecheyanu. While the gemara (ibid. 59b-60a) cites an opinion that this b'racha is only for the first such acquisition, which would exclude the possibility of a b'racha on renovations, we follow the opinion that it applies even if one built a second house (Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chayim 223:3). But are renovations comparable to a new house? The gemara in Sota (mishna, 43a; gemara, 44a) discusses the halacha that one who builds a new house that he has not inaugurated returns from the battlefield. The first opinion identifies building projects on his property that do not qualify as building a house. Rabbi Yehuda says that even if one rebuilt the house on its previous site, he does not return from battle. However, the gemara posits that extending the house's height does qualify. The Mishna Berura (223:12) says that this serves as a halachic precedent for Shehecheyanu as well. Contemporary poskim (see Halichot Shlomo 23:14 in the name of Rav S.Z. Auerbach and V'zot HaB'racha, p. 166 in the name of Rav M. Eliyahu) assume the same is true for any significant extension of the house, even without acquiring new land. However, renovations that do not include expansion, but just improvement of the house's appearance or functionality, are not comparable to building or buying and do not warrant a b'racha (ibid.). The time for the b'racha is when the new area is ready to be used, which coincides with the time for attaching a mezuza (V'zot HaB'racha ibid.). (We are not relating to the new furniture that often accompanies renovations, which itself likely warrants a b'racha.) A few factors could raise questions about the b'racha. The first is that there is a minhag cited by several Sephardi poskim to not make a b'racha on a new house. It is hard to determine this minhag's exact origin, reason, and extent. The Pri Megadim (223, Mishbetzot Zahav 4), who is Ashkenazi, suggest that there is a minhag to not make Shehecheyanu on clothes and utensils, and he suggests that these people must rely on the opinion that Shehecheyanu for such events is merely optional. The Ben Ish Chai (I, R'ei 5-6) is not impressed by this logic, but he confirms the minhag concerning a new house. He recommends solving the problem by following a different minhag. One makes a chanukat habayit upon entering the house, at which point he wears a new garment and recites Shehecheyanu with intention for the house in addition to the garment. I do not know if there is such a minhag of a chanukat habayit for renovations. However, those who want to follow the minhag, OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 14 The Yitro 5775 issue as opposed to the established halacha to make the b'racha (Yalkut Yosef 223:2 and Birkat Hashem 2:57 do not believe the minhag should uproot it), can solve the issue with a new garment. Rav Chayim Palagi and the Kaf HaChayim (OC 223:18) say that one who bought a house on credit does not make a b'racha because of the trouble he may have paying up and the possibility he might have to return it to the seller. Besides the strong questions on the basic opinion (see Birkat Hashem 2:(250)), the situation is uncommon regarding renovations, as even one who takes loans for that purpose rarely is nervous about his ability to pay, and the renovations will not be "returned". Is Shecheyanu the correct b'racha? The rule is that for acquisitions that benefit more than one person, Shehechyanu is replaced by Hatov V'hameitiv (Shulchan Aruch, ibid. 5). The gemara talks about buying a house with a partner, but this also applies to family members (see Shulchan Aruch ibid. and Be'ur Halacha to 223:3). If there is a question of doubt between the two b'rachot, Shehecheyanu is the safer one, as it can work even when Hatov V'hameitiv is appropriate (Be'ur Halacha to 223:5). This is apparent from those (including above) who suggest using the b'racha on new clothes to cover the b'racha on a new house. Rav Daniel Mann, Eretz Hemdah Institute Rabbi Weinreb's Weekly Column: Yitro "The Maternal Influence" When I was young I was an avid reader of novels. As I've grown older, I have found myself more interested in good biographies. I especially appreciate those biographies of great men that try to focus on what exactly made them great. Particularly, I try to discover the roles played by father and mother in the formation of these personalities. Until relatively recently, Jewish tradition did not have many biographies of our heroes and heroines. Bible and Talmud contain much material about the lives of prophets, kings, and sages, but only occasionally give us a glimpse of the role that parental influences played in making them great. I recently came across a passage in a book by a man I admire. His name was Rabbi Yitzchak Yaakov Reines (1839-1915). He was the head of a very innovative yeshiva in Lida, Lithuania, and was one of the founders of the Mizrachi Religious Zionist movement. He was a prolific writer, and one of his works is entitled Nod Shel Dema'ot, which translates as "A Flask of Tears". In this book, Rav Reines writes about the important role that mothers play in the development of their children - sons and daughters alike. He emphasizes the role of the OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 15 The Yitro 5775 issue mother in the development of the Torah scholar. He claims that it is not only the father's teaching that motivates and informs the budding Jewish leader. Rather, it is the mother's feminine intuition and maternal compassion that are, at the very least, equally formative. The sources of his thesis include a verse from this week's Torah portion, Yitro (Sh'mot 18:1-20:23), in which we read that G-d called to Moshe from the mountain and said, "Thus shall you say to the house of Yaakov and declare to the children of Yisrael … you shall be to Me a kingdom of kohanim and a holy nation…" (19:3-6). The Midrash explains that "Beit Yaakov" refers to women and "Bnei Yisrael" to men. Both men and women must be involved if we are to become "a kingdom of kohanim and a holy nation". "Why the women?" asks the Midrash, and answers, "Because they are the ones who can inspire their children to walk in the ways of Torah." Rav Reines adduces another biblical verse to make his point. He refers to the words in the very first chapter of the Book of Mishlei, in which King Solomon offers this good counsel: "My son, heed the discipline (mussar) of your father, and do not forsake the instruction (Torah) of your mother" (1:8). From this verse, it seems that the mother's message may be even more important for the child's guidance than that of his father. After all, father merely admonishes the child with words of "discipline", whereas mother imparts nothing less than the "instruction" of the Torah itself. Then comes the tour de force of Rav Reines' essay: the biographical analysis of a great Talmudic sage, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Chananya. The student of Pirkei Avot will recognize his name from a passage in Chapter Two of that work. There we read of the five disciples of Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai. They are enumerated, and the praises of each of them are recounted. Of Rabbi Yehoshua ben Chananya, we learn, "Ashrei yoladeto, happy is she who gave birth to him." Of all the outstanding disciples, only Rabbi Yehoshua's mother is brought into the picture. What special role did she play in his life that earned her honorable mention? Rav Reines responds by relating an important story of which most of us are sadly ignorant. The story is recorded in B'reishit Rabba 64:10. It tells of a time, not long after the destruction of the Second Temple by Rome, when the Roman rulers decided to allow the Jewish people to rebuild the Temple. Preliminary preparations were already under way for that glorious opportunity when the Kutim, usually identified with the Samaritan sect, confounded those plans. They maligned the Jews to the Romans and accused them of disloyalty. The OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 16 The Yitro 5775 issue permission to rebuild was revoked. Having come so close to realizing this impossible dream, the Jews gathered in the valley of Beit Rimon with violent rebellion in their hearts. They clamored to march forth and rebuild the Temple in defiance of the Roman's decree. However, the more responsible leaders knew that such a provocation would meet with disastrous consequences. They sought for a respected figure, sufficiently wise and sufficiently persuasive, to calm the tempers of the masses and to quell the mutiny. They chose Rabbi Yehoshua ben Chananya for the task. The Midrash quotes Rabbi Yehoshua's address in full detail. He used a fable as the basis of his argument: A lion had just devoured its prey, but a bone of his victim was stuck in his throat. The lion offered a reward to anyone who would volunteer to insert his hand into his mouth to remove the bone. The stork volunteered, and thrust its long neck into the lion's mouth and extracted the bone. When the stork demanded his reward, the lion retorted, "Your reward is that you can forevermore boast that you had thrust your head into a lion's mouth and lived to tell the tale. Your survival is sufficient reward." So, too, argued Rabbi Yehoshua, our survival is our reward. We must surrender the hope of rebuilding our Temple in the interests of our national continuity. There are times when grandiose dreams must be foresworn so that survival can be assured. Rav Reines argues that this combination of cleverness and insight into the minds of men was the result of his mother's upbringing. The ability to calm explosive tempers and sooth raging emotions is something that Rabbi Yehoshua learned from his mother. He was chosen for this vital role in Jewish history because the other leaders knew of his talents, and perhaps even knew that their source was to be traced back to his mother, of whom none other than Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai had exclaimed, "Happy is she who gave birth to him." This wonderful insight of Rav Reines is important for all of us to remember, particularly those of us who are raising children. Psychologists have long stressed the vital roles that mothers play in child development. In our religion, we put much stress on the father's role in teaching Torah to his children. But we often underestimate, and indeed sometimes even forget, the role of the mother. Our tradition urges us to embrace the role of the mother not just in the child's physical and emotional development, but in his or her spiritual and religious growth as well. We would do well to remember that OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 17 The Yitro 5775 issue Rav Reines is simply expanding upon G-d's own edict to Moshe at the very inception of our history: "Speak to the house of Yaakov! Speak to the women as well as to the men." Mothers, at least as much as fathers, are essential if we are to create a "kingdom of kohanim and a holy nation." The Trade and Commerce of the Talmid Chacham by Dr. Meir Tamari Guidelines from Nezikim: Embezzelment, Robbery, and Theft in the Market [1] "ONE WHO ROBBED HIS FELLOW [of an article] SHAVEH P'RUTA [at least of minimal value]..." (Bava Kama 9:8). All markets are based on the fundamental assumption that the property rights of all the players will be protected within the framework of the market. This applies equally to the employer and employee, buyer and seller, lender and borrower, and to the investor-entrepreneur and society. Wherever this is not assured, then either there will be no market or people will require high rates of profitability to enter. It is easy therefore to see the Torah's laws against unethical behavior in the marketplace, simply as logical and rational ones that could be constructed by ordinary human intelligence. Indeed this is the opinion of the Rambam (Sh'moneh P'rakim 8). However, most of our commentators and authorities do not agree with the Rambam, instead they see them as flowing from Hashem's Wisdom with perspectives and effects that human intelligence could never achieve. "Thereby the mishpatitm, social laws, include areas, perspectives and relevance that otherwise would be beyond our knowledge. This also makes them subject to the justice and punishment of G-d" (Abarbanel, Introduction to Mishpatim). Our Mishna is based on the verses of Vayikra (5:21-26) which make quite clear the divine source of Torah's treatment of these unethical acts. Right at the beginning of these verses theft, fraud, robbery or oppression are classed as me'ila, treachery or betrayal [in modern Hebrew, embezzlement] against G-d. There are no secret crimes in Judaism. Rabbi Akiva queried making immorality in a human commercial transaction, a treachery against G-d but then also provided the answer. "G-d is always a witness to all our financial transactions even where only the 2 parties witness them and therefore denying any obligations are a denial of Hashem (Sifra). Me'ila is the term used in connection with any misuse of property of the Mishkan-Mikdash or its use by non-qualified people. "We see that it is worse to steal from humans than to steal from G-d. Where a person takes property of the OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 18 The Yitro 5775 issue sanctuary [G-d's property], he sins only if he actually uses it, whereas one sins by merely taking another's property even if he does not use it." Making economic crimes not only damaging of other people's property rights but also religious sins, acts against G-d, takes our treatment of them far beyond considerations only of market efficiency, monetary loss, social instability and even of any mental anguish suffered by the injured party. By Jewish law the perpetuator has to compensate and appease the owner for the theft. However, there are no victimless crimes in Judaism, so what about the spiritual-psychological-moral damage suffered by the perpetuator himself? "So the transgressor must still bring a korban in order to do t'shuva, since he has sinned against G--d as well" (Sefer Hachinuch 129; S'fornoo). "Most people are not outright criminals but all like to take advantage of their fellows to earn unjustified profits at another's expense" (Ramchal, Mesilat Yesharim). The spiritual and religious aspects of being guilty of such economic crimes is reflected in the rulings of all the codes; Mishneh Torah, Arba Turim and Shulchan Aruch. "It is forbidden to steal [or to rob] anything, whether from a Jew or from a non-Jew, whether from an old person or from a child, in jest or in order to annoy the owner, in order to later return the article, even to become liable for the two-fold or fourfold or fivefold fines" (Choshen Mishpat 348:1). From our verses in Vayikra, the sages learnt a halakhic difference between theft, fraud, robbery or oppression of articles worth less that a pruta, the smallest measure of value and all others articles. The Gemara's definition of theft of something worth less than a pruta is one who breaks off a twig from his fellow's hedge for his use. This is theft even though there are no legal actions and even though the owner waives any claims [Sanhedrin 57a). Unethical behavior in such cases is considered a cheit-sin but is not the subject for legal action; anything regarding a greater value is asham-guilty and is and can be the subject of litigation. Notwithstanding the legal distinctions between them, both are forbidden acts, entail divine punishment and require t'shuva. "Chazal teach that the fate of Dor HaMabul was not sealed until they were guilty of robbery. Even though they were guilty of idolatry and murder as well, it is through robbery that the whole moral and spiritual world begins to decline" (Shem MiShmuel). "And the world was filled with chamas and the world became corrupted'; 'the chamas of the generation of the Flood was the theft of things worth less than a shaveh pruta, which cannot be brought before the courts' " (B'reishit Rabba). "When theft through legal means becomes a norm, society disintegrates and becomes corrupt" (S.R. Hirsch). OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 19 The Yitro 5775 issue The following is from Sapphire from the Land of Israel A New Light on the Weekly Portion from the Writings of Rabbi Abraham Isaac HaKohen Kook by Rabbi Chanan Morrison website: ravkooktorah.org Breaking Bread with Scholars Adapted from Ein Eyah vol. II, pp. 395-396 A Meal Before G-d When Moshe's father-in-law Yitro met the Israelites in the desert, he rejoiced when he heard about the rescue of the Jewish people from Pharaoh’s hand, and he brought offerings to G-d. And Aharon and all the elders of Israel came to share the meal with Moshe's father-in-law before G-d. (Sh'mot 18:12) The expression “before G-d” appears out of place here. In what way was this particular feast in G-d’s presence? The Talmudic sage Rabbi Avin explained: To partake of a meal where a Torah scholar is present is like enjoying the splendor of G-d’s Divine Presence. After all, did Yitro, Aharon, and the elders of Israel eat before G-d? They ate before Moshe! Rather, this verse teaches us that sharing a meal with a scholar [such as Moshe] is like enjoying the splendor of G-d’s Presence. (B'rachot 64a) Rabbi Avin’s statement needs to be clarified. What is so wonderful about eating with a Torah scholar? Wouldn’t studying Torah with him be a much greater spiritual experience? And in what way is such a meal similar to “enjoying the splendor of G-d’s Presence”? Common Denominator The human soul, for all its greatness, is limited in its ability to grasp and enjoy G-d’s infinite wisdom. Whatever degree of pleasure we are able to derive from G-d’s Presence is a function of our spiritual attainments. The greater our spiritual awareness, the greater the pleasure we feel in G-d’s Presence. But while we will never gain complete mastery of Divine wisdom, even the small measure of comprehension that is possible is sufficient to fill the soul with tremendous light and joy. A Torah scholar whose holiness is great, whose wisdom is profound, and whose conduct is lofty cannot be properly appreciated by the masses. Common folk will not understand his wisdom and may not be able to relate to his holiness. In what way can they connect with such a lofty scholar? A scholar’s greatest influence takes place in those spheres where others can best relate to him. Most people will be unable to follow his erudite lectures, but a meal forms a common bond between the most illustrious and the most ordinary. This connection allows everyone to experience some aspect of a great OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 20 The Yitro 5775 issue scholar’s path in Torah and service of G-d. When a Torah scholar reveals his great wisdom and holiness, the average person will be overcome by a sense of unbridgeable distance from such sublime attainments. He may despair of ever reaching a level so far beyond his own limited capabilities. But when sharing a meal with a scholar, the common physical connection enables people to be more receptive to the scholar’s noble traits and holy conduct. Of course, those who are able to understand the scholar’s wisdom can more fully appreciate his greatness. Those individuals will derive greater benefit and pleasure from him. This is precisely Rabbi Avin’s point: just as the degree of pleasure gained from G-d’s Presence depends on the soul’s spiritual state, so too, the benefit we derive from a great scholar depends on our spiritual level and erudition. OzTorah SOUND OR SILENCE? Read chapter 19 of Sh’mot and see how many words are about noise thunder, lightning, voice, speech. Read midrashic commentary and see how many words are about silence - hush, quiet, serenity, calm. Which set of words is more true? They both are. The Giving of the Torah was sound amid silence - or silence amid sound. There are two ways of communication, in sound and in silence. There are times for sound, especially when the Divine voice proclaims the eternal verities. There are times for silence, when the attentive world hears every nuance and is awestruck at the grandeur of the moment. In human history there are times when silence is courage, such as when Aharon sees the tragedy that befalls his sons who sin, and Aharon remains silent - perhaps because he realises the justice of the Divine punishment, perhaps because he cannot and must not find the words to cry out. There are times, though, when silence is crass cowardice, when evil abounds and the good people hold their peace - perhaps because they are afraid that they will draw attention to themselves and be the next to be attacked, perhaps because they haven’t the nerve to stand up, speak up and be counted. The glory of being human is that the decision is up to us, whether to utter a sound or hold one’s tongue. K Reprinted (with permission) from Shabbat Shalom Parsha Booklet (4) by Rabbi Berel Wein Yitro is one of the most enigmatic of all of the personages that appear in the Torah. There are many Yitros in Yitro's life and perhaps this is the reason that the rabbis taught us that he possessed seven different names. Each name perhaps represented a different Yitro at a different point of his life. We meet him at the crossroads of his life's choices and beliefs. On one hand he is a priest or former priest of paganism in Midian. He has experimented with every form of religion in the world before coming to the faith of monotheism. He is influenced undoubtedly by his unexpected son-in-law, Moshe. But he is also greatly influenced by the Exodus from Egypt and the visible and impressive miracles that accompanied this event. But there is also an inner conviction that moves him and makes him a monotheistic believer. He states: "Now I know that the Lord is God for He has avenged Himself on the Egyptians in the manner that they intended to destroy the Jews." The Egyptians drowned Jewish children in the Nile and they were therefore drowned themselves at Yam Suf. Thus Yitro is impressed not only by the miracle of the destruction of the Egyptian oppressor but by the manner and method of destruction that the miracle exhibited itself. It is the measure for measure method of punishment that truly fascinates him and leads him to abandon his home and background to join Israel in the desert. Having arrived at his new beliefs by judicial and rational analysis, Yitro then applies that same method in advising his son-in-law Moshe as to the formulation and efficient operation of the Jewish judicial system in the desert. He is consistent in his analytical approach to matters. Perhaps that is why he was so positively influenced by the measure for measure punishment of the Pharaoh and his Egyptian hordes. Yitro is the ultimate "outsider" looking in to see Torah and the Jewish people. Many times the "outsider" sees things more clearly than the "insider" in a society does. In Yiddish there is an expression that a temporary guest sees for a mile. (I know that this lost something in translation but you get the gist of it.) The Jewish people, especially in our religious world, live a somewhat insular existence. Due to this, many times we are unable to see what otherwise can be plain to others. The example of Yitro encourages us to give respect to the insights of "outsiders" in our community. Oftentimes they come from different backgrounds and have fought their way through many false beliefs to OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 22 The Yitro 5775 issue arrive at Torah and the observance of mitzvot. Their views and experiences should be important to us. The tendency to force the "outsiders" to become exactly like the "insiders" is eventually counterproductive to both groups. Yitro never becomes Moshe but Moshe and Israel benefit from Yitro's judgment and advice. We can all benefit from insights, advice and good wishes from our own "outsiders". TtRiDdLeS Previous (B'shalach) TTriddles: [1] If he is of us We've done this one in the past, with variation. The words, phrase, sentence, whatever are meaningless. The only thing that means anything is a sequence of five 2-letter words, as found at the end of B'shalach - KI YAD AL KEIS KAH. Don't remember if this sequence in the Torah is unique or just extremely rare. But it is a well-known sequence. [2] It's before the Torah, but in the Torah, it's before what? In the famous saying: DERECH ERETZ KODMA LATORAH, it (Derech Eretz) is before the word Torah. In the Torah, the words DERECH ERETZ occur at the bginning of B'shalach and are followed by the word P'LISHTIM. [3] One in double Noa'ch of one Sheim NO'ACH = 50+8 = 58. Double No'ach is 116. SHEIM = 300+40 = 340. B'SHALACH = 2+300+30+8 = 340. So the TTriddle means: One mitzva in the 116 p'sukim of B'shalach. Interesting observation told to me by MF in the name of Rav Mattis Weinberg. The sedra of B'shalach divides neatly into 58 p'sukim and 58 p'sukim, exactly at the end of the Shira. The first half of the sedra deals with the conclusion of the Exodus: The People are out, Egypt pursues, the sea splits, the People go through on dry land. Egypt follows and is drowned as the sea returns. The people sing thanks and praise to G-d. End of chapter. 58 p'sukim. Next 58 p'sukim begin the next chapter as the people make their way to Sinai. They have stopped looking back. Literally and figuratively. [4] Goes together like a horse and what? No rhymes necessary The wording of this TTriddle comes from the song Love and Marriage a song with lyrics by Sammy Cahn and music by Jimmy Van Heusen, first introduced in 1955 by Frank Sinatra. In that song, Love and marriage were said to go together like a horse and carriage. NOT what we were looking for with this TTriddle. Hence, the no rhymes necessary comment. The TTriddle asked what is paired with horse, or rather SUS, in Tanach. In B'shalach we find SUS V'ROCH'VO, horse and its rider. In the book of D'varim we find SUS VARECHEV, horse and vehicle (chariot, probably). In OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 23 The Yitro 5775 issue Melachim Alef we find SUS VAFERED, horse and mule. Also in Melachim Alef, there is another SUS VARACHEV and a SUS UFARASHIM, horse and horsemen. There are more repeats of some of the above, but the official answer to this TTriddle would be: rider, chariot, mule, horsemen. [5] CF of Adirim and Chulam Common factor. In the Torah, the word right before the MI CHAMOCHA pasuk on Shirat HaYam is ADIRIM. In davening (besides AZ YASHIR in P'sukei d'Zimra) we find MI CHAMOCHA before the AMIDA of Shacharit and ARVIT. The word that precedes MI CHAMOCHA is CHULAM, as in V'AM'RU CHULAM, and they all said. There is a TBDATR piece related to this pasuk and what leads into it in davening, but instead of putting it here as a BTW comment in a TTriddle solution, maybe we'll do it in a regular TBDATR feature. See there (maybe). [6] Buttermilk & Dale The Lone Ranger's horse was Silver; Tonto's was Scout. Roy Rogers rode Trigger and his wife Dale Evan's horse was Buttermilk, making the answer to this TTriddle: SUS V'ROCH'VO, horse and its rider. Topper and Hoppy? Tornado and Zorro? Joker and Jingles? Better stop. Who rode Pie and who rode Nelson? Okay. No more. One more: Sophie. [7] FPTL - 6th Motza"Sh intro-verse Motza"Sh intro-verses refers to the p'sukim we say at Havdala before the brachot for wine, b'samim, fire, and hamavdil. Oops. We counted wrong. Sorry. The 5th pasuk is .K¨A g«¥ © hŸA mc¨`¨ ix¥y§ `© ,zF`¨a'v§ 'd Gimatriya: 26 + 90+2+1+6+400 (499) 1+300+200+10 (511) + 1+4+40 (45) + 2+9+8 (19) + 2+20 (22) = 1122. Why was the Torah NOT given in Israel? by Rabbi Ephraim Sprecher Dean of Students, Diaspora Yeshiva Why did G-d give the Torah in the Sinai Desert rather than in the Holy Land? The Talmud explains that G-d wanted to demonstrate that the Torah didn't belong to one nation alone or even to one country. A desert is halachically designated as a MAKOM HEFKER (an ownerless place). The Torah was not given in the Land of Israel for that would have meant that it was to be uniquely for the HOLY LAND. The Torah was given in a space and place, accessible to all humanity. The purpose of The Revelation at Sinai was to turn a world without Torah, which by definition is a barren desert, into a blooming and productive place for human existence. Yitro, Moshe's father-in-law, is the name of the Parsha in which we read the account of the most important event in Jewish history, the Giving of the Torah. It is remarkable that this Parsha has as its title, the name of OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 24 The Yitro 5775 issue someone who was not even born a Jew. Yitro was a pagan idol worshiper, but only later in life abandoned his paganism and recognized the One, True G-d. Why was Yitro chosen to have the Parsha of MATAN TORAH named after him? It is because he is the greatest illustration of what the Torah is meant to accomplish. The Torah's goal is to transform idolaters into believers and pagans into the worshipers of the One True G-d. Judaism is not a restrictive club for born Jews only. Any non-Jew who sincerely desires to embrace Torah true Judaism is welcome. When the Jewish People stood at Mount Sinai and were prepared to accept the Torah, G-d defined their mission by telling them, "Therefore if you will listen to My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be My own, special treasure from among all nations, for all the earth is Mine, and you shall be to Me a Kingdom of Kohanim and a Holy Nation" (Sh'mot 19). Yehuda HaLevi wonders about the phrase "a Kingdom of Priests" (MAMLECHET KOHANIM). Surely the Jewish People will not all be kohanim. The 12 Tribes were divided into Kohanim, Levites and Israelites. Most Jews are simply Israelites. Why does G-d say that the Jewish People in its entirety will become a "Kingdom of Priests"? Yehuda HaLevi answers that just as the Kohanim were to be the teachers and leaders for the rest of the Jewish People, so too the Jews have to become the leaders and teachers of the rest of the world. That is the meaning of "… You shall be My own special treasure from among all nations…" We are to be the Kohanim who will insure that all nations eventually will acknowledge the One True G-d. That's why G-d says "…for all the earth is Mine." We Jews perform our G-d-given task in 2 ways - Judaism for Jews and those who want to sincerely convert to Judaism and the Torah's 7 Noahide Laws for the gentiles. Our motto to non-Jews is "Keep the 7 and go to Heaven." This Divine Plan is used by the Talmud to explain why Jews throughout history have been exiled around the globe. The Talmud offers the rationale that the punishment of our exile may have a totally different purpose. "G-d did not exile Israel among the nations but only so converts might join them, as is written, 'And I, (G-d), will plant her for Me in the land'… (Hoshe'a 2:25); "Surely a man plants a SE'AH [a biblical measure] in order to harvest many KOR" [an even greater measure] (Pesachim 87b). Our mission as Jews is to spread the knowledge of the One True G-d, as the prophet Yeshayahu says, "We are to be a light unto the nations". OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 25 The Yitro 5775 issue MACHON PUAH The Book of Remedies Last week we closed with the Mishna (Pesachim 4:9) that praised King Chizkiyahu for secreting away the Book of Remedies. The Bartenura explained that instead of praying when they got ill, people just relied on the medicines and potions contained in the Book of Remedies and the King secreted it away to urge people to pray instead. This suggests that it is more commendable to pray than to rely on doctors and medicine. However the Rambam has a completely different explanation. He derides those who explain that the Book of Remedies prevented the people from praying. Chizkiyahu would not do such a thing, claims the Rambam, for such is the way of fools. In the same way that one eats and still praises and prays to God and the two are not at all mutually exclusive, on the contrary when we eat we appreciate God's gifts that enables us to be full and satisfied, so can a person seek medical advice and treatment and can still thank and pray to God. The Book of Remedies, explains the Rambam, was filled with medical treatments that were inappropriate and were treated like talisman and forbidden amulets. These were forbidden since they were idolatrous and removed the people from being connected to God. This was the reason that King Chizkiyahu stored away such a book and did not want the populous to get their hands on such remedies. In his commentary on the Mishna (Nedarim 4:4), the Rambam writes that "the doctor is obligated from the law to heal the sick of Israel and this is included in the verse 'and you will return to him' (D'varim 22:2) that includes his body, that if he saw it being destroyed and he can save it then he saves him with his body, his money or his knowledge." The doctor is obliged to heal the sick person and this is deduced from the verse "and you will return to him" and sees returning someone's health as no different from returning his lost belongings. In the same way that if one finds something that belongs to another person has to return it so if we can give back a person their health then we also have to do so. But this raises the question, why did the Rambam use this verse as a source and not the more commonly used verse "and he will heal" from which the Gemara deduced that the doctor is permitted to heal? More on this next week. Rabbi Gideon Weitzman, Director, Puah Institute CHIZUK ! IDUD Divrei Torah from the weekly sedra with a focus on living in Eretz Yisrael Chizuk for Olim & Idud for not-yet-Olim The Parsha begins with two simple words: VAYISHMA YITRO - and Yitro heard. Yitro does not only hear, his listening leads him to action. The reports of major world events have an immediate effect upon him galvanizing OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 26 The Yitro 5775 issue him to take life-transforming action: “Yitro, the Kohen of Midian, Moshe’s father-in-law, heard all that G-d had done for Moshe and His People…" Yitro gathers together his daughter and grandchildren, and a few short verses later we already read that "Yitro, Moshe's father-in-law… came to the desert where he was camped, to the mountain of G-d”. Rashi cites the Gemara (Zevachim 116a) which states that Yitro had heard both of the splitting of the sea as well as reports describing the war lsrael waged against Amalek. These reports prompted him to journey from Midian to the encampment of the Israelites in the desert. Analyzing what Yitro heard, we can guess which feelings were aroused within the "Kohen of Midian". – First, as a religious person, he was made aware of the miracles that Hashem performed for His People - e.g. - splitting of the sea. Yitro, a priest of Midian, was first impelled to act by the Divine miracles. Secondly, he was made aware of the war against Amalek which indicated that the miracles were not a one-time event, rather Hashem’s care and concern for the People would be on-going. G-d would continue to protect them against their enemies thereby enabling them to reach their goals. Yitro was not the only one to have heard of these events. “Many nations heard”, but Yitro was the only one who was propelled to action. How would we have reacted in his place? This may sound slightly far-fetched but I would suggest we need not imagine very hard. It seems reasonable to compare Yitro's situation with our own. The miracles of the Exodus can be compared to what happened to the Jewish People after the Holocaust. The Jewish People seemed to have fallen into a bottomless pit both in ancient Egypt as well as in Nazi Germany. Millions upon millions were doomed in Egypt the children were thrown into the sea, in Germany they were led to the gas chambers. Yet, after the hell of the Holocaust, the miraculous re-establishment of Medinat Yisrael reverberated loudly throughout the whole world - on par with the splitting of the sea. We, today, have not only heard of the splitting of the sea - the "sea of nations" which split wide to grant us the right to finally re-establish a Jewish state. We have also heard, and continue to hear of the war against the Amalekites. The war we continuously wage against those - like Amalek of old - whose hatred for the Jews is not based on this-worldly concerns. The Jewish people posed no threat to Amalek who like their modern day anti-semite counterparts, were motivated by their antipathy and hatred towards the Jewish People as G-d’s Chosen People. In truth, though, Yitro was not the only one affected by these events. The people of Israel whom he joined at the foot of the mountain of G-d, were encamped there K'ISH ECHAD B'LEV ECHAD, as one person with a single heart. The shared events had brought them together as one, and this unity was a necessary prerequisite for receiving the Torah. Where is this unity today? In the Israeli elections which took place in January 1949, despite OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 27 The Yitro 5775 issue differing Ideologies, there was a special unity of purpose. A one-time event took place, which has not been repeated in any subsequent election. All of the religious parties were united running together on one single slate! The United Religious Front (Chazit Datit Meuchedet) was formed bringing together four different religious parties, the Mizrachi, Hapoel Hamizrachi, Agudat Yisrael and Poalei Agudat Yisrael. Rav Shaul Yisraeli [himself number 49 on the joint list] noted later on, how in those early years we were able to put aside religious, and other, differences and celebrate together the day when we arose from the dust to become an independent state. Oh, if only we were able to do the same today! The miracles, Baruch Hashem, still continue taking place on a daily basis, if only - like Yitro - we could learn to hear of them and be propelled to reach the right conclusions! Rabbi Yerachmiel Roness, Ramat Shiloh, Beit Shemesh Portion Shabbat and our young children This week we read the Ten Commandments - the utterances from G-d that changed the world. The fourth commandment is to keep the Shabbat. We are told that on the seventh day we shouldn't do any work. Also our sons and daughters, servants, and animals must not work on Shabbat. Rashi asks a question on the verse "ATA UVINCHA UVITECHA - you, your son and your daughter" (20:10). Is this verse referring to older children or to younger children? If it's referring to older children, why does the verse have to specify them as well? If we are commanded to keep Shabbat, they as adults - someone over bar or bat mitzva - are also obligated. So Rashi concludes that the verse comes to warn parents of their obligation to make sure that even their young children, who are minors, keep Shabbat. This Halachic topic is discussed in Yevamot (114a), which was learned recently by those learning Daf Yomi. Below is the text in English from Yevamot, taken from the Koren Talmud Bavli. The Noe Edition, edited by Rabbi Dr. Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, and published by the Shefa Foundation and Koren Publishers. If a gentile comes to extinguish a Jew's fire on Shabbat, one may not say to him: "Extinguish" or "Do not extinguish", because responsibility for his rest is not incumbent upon the Jew. However, if a Jewish child comes to extinguish a fire on Shabbat, they do say to him: "Do not extinguish", despite the fact that he is not yet obligated in mitzva observance, because responsibility for his rest is incumbent upon the Jew. This shows that one must prevent a minor from violating a Torah prohibition. OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 28 The Yitro 5775 issue Rabbi Yochanan said: This is referring to a minor who is acting with his father's consent. The Koren Talmud Bavli, Noe Edition includes notes by Rabbi Adin EvenIsrael Steinsaltz as well as a section where the Halacha is summarized. In the notes section, Rabbi Steinsaltz discusses the difference between a court, and the father of a minor. Some state that there is no difference between the obligation of the court (beit din) or the father in stopping a young child from transgressing (Tosefot Rid.) Whereas others indicate that the obligation of the father is greater than that of a beit din, due to reasons that go beyond the mitzva of education in the narrow sense of the term (Rambam). The commentaries add that this difference makes sense since a father is obligated to educate his children in the performance of mitzvot, while the court's role is to prevent minors from transgressing (Yam shel Shlomo). In the Halacha section it explains that one may not let a minor become accustomed to desecrating the Shabbat, even with respect to an action prohibited by rabbinic law. Practically, we must keep this in mind. For example parents might think that if the light gets turned off by accident on Shabbat, it's better to have a young child turn it back on because "they don't really know yet what they are doing. They won't realize. It won't affect them." But from the verse in our portion quoted above, we learn that parents have a special obligation to make sure that their young children are keeping Shabbat. Whereas a stranger might be able to ignore the transgressions of a young child, the child's parents have a different type of responsibility and must guide his behavior. Mazal Tov to all those who finished Yevamot in Daf Yomi. Good luck with the next tractate, Ketubot (also called mini Shas, because it encompasses most of the sugyot learned in the Talmud). For those looking for an English translation, commentary and study aid to learn with, The Koren Talmud Bavli, Noe edition is an option. It includes the traditional Vilna pages in Aramaic on the right side, with translation and summary on the left, with easy referencing between the two sides. It also has introductions and summaries of the chapters as well as color illustrations. SINCE WE TALKED ABOUT Shabbat here is a simple potato kugel recipe, a traditional Shabbat food. POTATO KUGEL 3 lbs. potatoes, grated (drain the water) 3 eggs, beaten 1 lg. onion, grated 1 cup oil ¼ cup Matza meal Salt & pepper Beat eggs well. Add onion, matza meal, oil, and potatoes. Mix well. Add OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 29 The Yitro 5775 issue more oil, if necessary, so mixture looks oily. Bake in 180°C oven for about 45 to 50 minutes. Cool and serve. Ed. note: There is one rule of Shabbat that children need not follow, nor do parents have to train their children in this rule before Bar/Bat Mitzva. Children may eat before Kiddush and should not be made to feel bad if they do. Maharal on the Sedra Speech is for the Living, in this World and after the Revival of the Dead Sh'mot 19:16 - And it was on the third day, there were voices… Tiferet Yisrael 30:452b - When the Torah was given, the spiritual order emerged into actuality, for until then it was only in potential. This emergence was accompanied by voices [kolot], which originate as wind in the lungs, potential speech, which is formed into speech by the throat, palate, teeth, and lips, creating a sound that did not exist originally. Torah is the completed perfected existence, which is why it was given with five voices - the voice of rejoicing, the voice of happiness, the voice of bridegroom the voice of bride, the voice of bridegrooms emerging from the bridal canopy. The number five represents the whole world - the spreading out in four directions and the central point of spirituality. Batra 16b]. The mourner is silent because death has come to a close relative, and a partial death comes to him as well. It is not fitting for him to bring his speech into actuation and shelemut, for nothing actuates like speech. On the other hand, when a man is in shelemut, he can sing and give praises to the source of his shelemut. When the Torah refers to nefesh chaya [living soul], Onkelos renders it ruach memallela [a speaking spirit], implying speech is the life force itself. The lower creations serve the higher creations listed as inanimate [domaim], plant life [tzome'ach], animal life [chai], and speaker [medaber, man]. Speech is, then, life force itself, and Torah becomes manifest and perfected through it. Shlomo tells us, "When you walk, it shall lead you, when you lie down, it will watch over you, and when you awake. it shall talk with you" [Mishlei 6:22]. Torah guides you in this world, protects you in the grave from Gehinom and chibut hakever [the powerful kick that greets you when you die], and after the revival of souls, speaks to you. Column prepared by Dr. Moshe Kuhr Speech is the mechanism by which man becomes completely actualized. This is hinted at by saying that the mourner has no mouth [Bava OU Israel Center TT 1123 page 30 The Yitro 5775 issue Hearing ear of VAYISHMA YITRO, and Yitro heard... • B"H was said by Yitro when he heard all the things that G-d had done for Israel. From that we are taught that one makes a bracha on miracles • Scales are for the justice system, Yitro's suggestions, Moshe's response, etc. • Yitro's advice included the assignment of "captains" of groups of 1000, 100, 50, and 10 - represented by the Roman numerals M,C,L,X • Bnei Yisrael's arrival at Har Sinai is described by the word VAYICHAN, as Rashi puts it, we were like one person with one heart. That's the graphic under the ear • The Shofar is one of the symbols of the Sinai experience, as we more than mention on Rosh HaShana • The washing machine is for the people to clean their clothes during the preparatory days for Matan Torah • Wine cup is for Kiddush (Zachor) • and the negation circle is for the prohibition of Melacha, including writing, watering plants, digging, sewing, building • Do not steal (the Xed out thief) • and do not go up to the Mizbei'ach with steps (the negated ladder) are two other prohibitions in the sedra • Volcano represents Har Sinai smoking from the fire of G-d's presence • An angel flew to the Heavenly Mizbei'ach and picked up a glowing coal in a pair of tongs. He then touched the coal to Yeshayahu's lips, representing a purifying process that would allow the prophet to speak on behalf of G-d • MEM SOFIT, which is better called a "Closed" MEM, appears in the haftara in the middle of a WORD, rather than at the end, where we are used to seeing that kind of MEM • Three dots and a short vertical line are the difference in the 4-commandment pasuk between the two sets of TROP-notes • Max Baer Jr. played Jethro (Yitro) for 9 years on the Beverly Hillbillies • 1-18 is LOW on a roulette wheel, tea, saw as in LO TISA, Dibra #3 • Upper right: the dragonfly has four wings and the White House has two wings. Together they represent the six wings of the angels described by Yehshayahu in the haftara • Many hospitals are named Mt. Sinai, as the one pictured in Manhattan • Two different symbols for UV, ultra-violet light or radiation. In Hebrew, AL-SEGOLI. Feminine form for the color violet is SEGULA, as in G-d's promise that we will be for Him the AM SEGULA above all other nations - hence, ULTRA-SEGULA • Above Jethro and to the right is a montage of characters from Scholastic Press's Goosebumps series... When Yitro came to Moshe, having heard about the Splitting of the Sea and the battle against Amalek (and maybe about Matan Torah), Moshe detailed all that had happened to Bnei Yisrael. The Torah describes Yitro's reaction with the words VAYICHAD YITRO. Rashi says that the plain meaning of the word is that Yitro rejoiced because of all the things he heard. Rashi gives a second possible explanation of the word VAYICHAD. That Yitro's skin erupted in goosebumps. A nervous or frightened reaction, perhaps, to what happened to Egypt, to whom he had been allied and with whom he possibly identified. From here, our Sages tell us, we learn to be extremely sensitive to the convert, who has changed his life completely by becoming Jewish, but still has memories and feelings about his former life • Ehud Barak is for the BARAKIM that are mentioned in the relating of the Sinai experience • Tomi Lapid, similarly, is for the LAPIDIM in the same description • The can of bug spray represents one specific brand, whose name is a word that occurs in the sedra twice and two other times in the Torah, besides 9 more times in the rest of Tanach - RAID! • The fat heart is a reference in the haftara • The words at the top and bottom of the left-hand side of the ParshaPix are the four tastes - Sweet, salty, sour and bitter are four tastes - T'AMIM. Two of them are TAAMEI HA-ELYON, the upper notes, and two are TAAMEI HATACHTON, the lower notes • plus an Unexplained dxi¨ W¦ Ep¨r Ll§ l`¥ x¨U§ i¦ i¥paE § dWŸ ¤n :m¨Nkª Exn§ `¨ e§ ,d¨Ax© dg¨ n§ U¦ A§ dl¨ d ¡ Ÿ`« d¨ Last week's TBDATR featured the word NE-ER-MU which is accented, not on the last or next- to-last syllable, as almost all Hebrew words are, but on the third to the last sysllable. For your trivia information: The last in a series is called the ultimate. The next-to-the-last is called penultimate. Third to the last is called antepenultimate. And, believe it or not, preantepenultimate is fourth from last. NE-ER-MU is accented on the antepenultimate syllable, a.k.a. MIL-EIL D'MIL-EIL. This week's word is not really like that, although it appears the same. The syllables of this word are HA, O, and HELA. The HEI has a CHATAF-SEGOL under it, which is a very short vowel in the SH'VA NA family. It does not make its own syllable, but is attached to the following syllable. For those who need a refresher: TBDATR stands for Towards Better Davening & Torah Reading. This piece is for davening. Shacharit and Arvit, the MI CHAMOCHA quote from the Shira is preceded by Moshe & Bnei Yisrael responded to you (G-d) with great joy, and said: MI CHAMOCHA... B'SIMCHA RABBA belongs with L'CHA ANU SHIRA - even though most people pause after SHIRA and attach B'SIMCHA RABBA to V'AM'RU CHULAM. Note the comma above - and in accurate siddurim - but bad habits are bad habits. And this goes even for RH and YK when the ingrained tune pauses in the wrong place. z¨AX© © d mF¬iÎz`¤ xFk¨ ²f :FW« C© §wl§ Shmirat Shabbat is equated to keeping all the mitzvot. Shabbat is (one of ) the symbols of our relationship with G-d. We keep Shabbat and Shabbat keeps us (so to speak). A pasuk that blesses the Jewish People for the special relationship we have with G-d is :ux¤`¨ ¨ e m¦in© W¨ dUŸ¥ r 'dl© mY¤ `© mikEx ¦ A§ T'hilim 115:15 - May you be blessed to G-d, maker of Heaven and Earth. These two p'sukim have the same gimatriya (1837)
© Copyright 2024