Translating the National Quality Landscape to the Local Level

Translating the National Quality
Landscape to the Local Level
GME Program Director Retreat
March 29, 2013
Health Plans
Employers
Bridges to
Excellence
CMS
Certification
Government &
Quasi-Governmental Orgs.
IOM
Independent
Quality Orgs
Providers
Hospitals & Health Systems
HHS
CMS
Nat. Qual
Strat.
FAH
AHA
IHI
Star Program
NCQA
Individual
Employers
Quality
measures for
alternate
payment
arrangements
(e.g., Bundled
Payments)
• Certification
• Accreditation
• HEDIS
Individual
Health Plans
Leapfrog
Pt. Prot. & Aff.
Care Act
AHRQ
AAMC
HQA
QIO “Scopes
of Work”
Truven Health
Analytics
NACHRI
Hosp. Comp.
CHCA
Independent WebBased Quality
Measurement
Organizations
Independent
subscription-based
services for employers
Primary Organizations
Measurement Consortia
Data initiatives, reports,
quality standards
Org. to Org. Influence
Reports & Measures
Top 100 Hospitals®
CMS Premier
• Quality
Indicators
• CAHPS
• HCAHPS
• National
Guideline
Clearnghse.
Value-based
Purchasing
Pediatric Qual. Meas.
Physicians
NQF
AMA
•
•
•
•
Accreditation
Certification
ORYX indicators
PS Sentinel Event
• Nat. Consensus Stds.
• Nat. Priorities
Partnership
• Measure Applications
Partnership
Hosp. Qual.
Incentive
Demo (HQID)
JD Power
TJC
Distinguished
Hospitals
Safety Leaps
• Unique
performancebased incentive
programs for
providers
• Proprietary rating
systems
• Unique
payment/quality
policies
5 million Lives
100K Lives
Phys. Specialty
Orgs
Phys. Qual. and
Report Sys.
migrating to VBP
Misc Provider
Rating Orgs
• Consumer
Reports
• St Louis Mag
Health Grades
•
•
•
•
State
govt.
Certification
STS QIs
ACC/AHA
Others
• Hosp. ratings
• Phys. ratings
US News
Top U.S. Hospitals
Nurses
WebMD
Various Care
Delivery &
Payment
Programs
• State
Reporting
Laws
• State
Payment/
Qual Policies
©2013 BJC HealthCare Center for Clinical Excellence. All rights reserved. May not reproduce without permission.
American Nurses
Association
NDNQI & Magnet
Certification
Variety of provider
scores
Pursuing Clinical Excellence at BJC
Background
•
The 2002 White Paper (2003 – 2007)
– Systematic tracking and reporting of clinical quality results
– Management accountability for clinical quality
– Transparency of useful quality information
3
BJC HealthCare Clinical Indicator Performance
2002 through 2011
100%
SCIP - Abx Timing
SCIP - Abx Selection
90%
SCIP - Abx Duration
AMI - Reperfusion
AMI - Aspirin at Arrival
80%
AMI - Beta Blocker at Arrival
AMI - Cholesterol Testing
70%
AMI - Aspirin at Disch.
AMI - Beta Blocker at Disch.
60%
AMI - ACE/ARB at Disch.
AMI - Statin at Disch.
AMI - Smoking Cessation
50%
CAP - Abx (6 hrs)
CAP - Blood Culture
40%
CAP - Abx Selection
CAP - Vaccine
30%
CAP - Smoking Cessation
CHF - ACE/ARB at Disch.
20%
CHF - LVF Assessment
CHF - AFib Aspirin
CHF - Disch. Instructions
10%
CHF - Smoking Cessation
CABG - Aspirin at Disch.
0%
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
CABG - Statin at Disch.
4
BIC 2013 Process Flow
1
Collect Metrics &
Complete Preliminary
Categorization
2
Screen Metrics for
harm
3
Screen metrics for
viability
 Metrics are evaluated through a KT decision analysis, which first eliminates all metrics that are not ‘musts’ as
identified through the harm, specification, and implementation evaluations
 Metrics are categorized in order to 1) Create composites within key improvement areas and 2) Promote balance in
evaluating metrics across key improvement areas
4
Screen metrics for
ability to implement
Mandatory Metrics
Evaluation Criteria
EBC
Review?
NOT Harmful?
Valid?
Feasible?
Hospital Specific Metric Pool
Drop
Actionable?
Attributable?
No
Does not meet all ‘musts’
Mandatory
Metric?
Drop
Meets all ‘MUST’
Yes
Key Quality Improvement Areas
5
Categorize Metrics
Composites within key
improvement areas
Appropriate Care
Efficiency
Care Coordination
Pt Safety
VBP Process of Care
No
Track
Pt Centered Outcome
Set annually by Clinical Excellence Steering
Committee and align to quality strategy
7
Impactful?
Yes
Risk Assessment
Evaluation Criteria
6
Assess Impact
Severe Outcomes?
Reduced Care Cost?
Prevalent?
Usable Data?
Improvable?
Transparent?
Financial Incentives/Penalties?
8
BIC
Candidate
5
BIC 2013 System Metric Selection
Number of Metrics
Collect Metrics
Conduct Initial
Screening
Assess for
Must Criteria
Appropriate Care
810
77
56
5
Efficiency
46
13
12
2
Patient Safety
173
51
33
7
VBP Process of Care
16
21
21
12
Care Coordination
35
10
7
1
Pt Centered Outcomes
86
10
1
0
1166
182
130
27
Composite
Total
Metrics Passing Initial
Screen
Candidate Measures
• 1166 metrics
• 107 total measure
stewards
• 10 stewards
contribute 2/3 of all
metrics
•
•
•
•
•
182 metrics
19 measure stewards
104 mandatory
24 existing BIC metrics
92 existing tracked
metrics
“Must” Metrics
•
•
•
•
•
130 metrics
13 measure stewards
104 mandatory
22 existing BIC metrics
79 existing tracked
metrics
Assess Impact
& Select Metrics
Final Best-in-Class
Metrics
• 27 metrics
• 23 mandatory metrics
6
Pursuing Clinical Excellence at BJC
Background
• The 2002 White Paper (2003 – 2007)
– Systematic tracking and reporting of clinical quality results
– Management accountability for clinical quality
– Transparency of useful quality information
• The 2012 White Paper (2008 – 2012)
– Eliminate defects in care that lead to patient harm
– Establish a framework through which BJC can help its patients and the
communities it serves achieve the best possible outcomes.
• The 2017 White Paper (2013-2017)
– Organize for Patient-Centered Outcomes
– Create a culture of patient safety and clinical excellence
– Enhance our capacity for innovation
7
Value-Based Purchasing
Overview
What is Value-Based Purchasing (VBP)?
• Part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of
2010 – Final rule April 29, 2011
• Designed to reward hospitals with higher quality care
• Based on existing Inpatient Quality Reporting program
• Funded by trimming CMS base operating DRG payments
–
–
–
–
–
FY 2013: 1%
FY 2014: 1.25%
FY 2015: 1.5%
FY 2016: 1.75%
FY 2017: 2%
• Not a cost savings measure; money given back to some
hospitals based on performance
9
VBP Measures
• Process of Care – 13 CMS core measures covering AMI,
CHF, pneumonia, and surgical care
• Patient Experience – 8 domains derived from the
HCAHPS survey
• Outcomes (new for FY2014) – 30 day mortality for AMI,
CHF, and pneumonia
• Efficiency (? FY2015) – Medicare spending per
beneficiary
10
VBP Timelines
VBP 2013 measures end 3/31/2012
VBP 2014 measures have varied time periods
2009
Q3
2010
Q4
Q1
Q2
2011
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
2012
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
2013
Q3
Q4
Q1
Process of Care and HCAHPS
FY 2013 Baseline
Baseline
FY 2013 Performance
Performance
FY 2014 Baseline
Baseline
FY 2014 Performance
Performance
Outcomes (30 Day Mortality)
FY 2014 Baseline
FY 2014 Performance
Baseline
Performance
11
VBP Score Weights
Hospitals receive a single Total Performance Score (TPS)
2013
2014
25%
30%
70%
45%
30%
Process of Care
HCAHPS
Outcomes (mortality)
12
VBP Payments
•
•
Total dollars given back depend on total dollars withheld
Payback % made on linear scale based on TPS
VBP Payout
Model
(max payback %)
2.0 %
1.5 %
1.28
%
1.0 %
0.5 %
0
25
50
TPS
75
71
AMH
100
Break even
TPS
Low
(1.5% )
67
Medium
(1.8%)*
56
High
(2%)
50
Very High
(2.35%)
43
*CMS projects 1.8%
maximum payback
13
BJC – VBP Scores FY 2013
Hospital
AMH
BHC
BJH
BJSP
BJWC
CH
MBMC
PHC
PWHC
Clinical
73.33
57.27
46.36
72.00
62.22
72.73
76.36
55.56
71.11
HCAHPS
47.00
53.00
27.00
42.00
36.00
36.00
23.00
46.00
40.00
TPS
65.43
55.99
40.55
63.00
54.36
61.71
60.35
52.69
61.78
Est. net gain/
Payback %
(loss) $
1.20
44.8K
1.03
19.9K
0.75
(453K)
1.16
32.6K
1.00
0
1.13
67.2K
1.11
94.4K
0.97
(3.3K)
1.14
7.5K
14
BJC – VBP Estimated Scores FY 2014
(as of Oct 2012)
Hospital
Clinical
AMH
BHC
BJH
BJSP
BJWC
CH
MBMC
PHC
PWHC
82.00
61.67
53.33
58.18
71.11
60.83
74.17
74.00
75.00
Low. est. net Mod. est. net
HCAHPS Outcomes* TPS** gain/(loss) $ gain/(loss) $
82.00
45.00
45.00
46.00
50.00
49.00
32.00
44.00
63.00
86.67
100
100
66.67
100
100
100
100
100
83.17
66.25
62.50
56.65
72.00
67.08
67.98
71.50
77.65
66K
(6.2K)
(151K)
(42K)
9.7K
4.2K
22K
10K
13K
132K
193K
302K
5.5K
36K
144K
253K
40K
32K
* based on projections from in-system mortality; there is a margin of error that is hard to
estimate
** break-even is projected at 67 for low payment estimate and 56 for moderate estimate
15
Best in Class 2013
16
Best In Class Changes: Adult Hospitals
2011
2012
40 incented
measures
4 Appropriate
Care Composites
+ 36 other
measures
5 incented
2013
6 incented
measures
(composites)
measures
(composites)
24 component
27 component
measures
measures
12 new to BIC
7 new to BIC
measures
measures
31 Hospital
Specific
Measures
17
BIC 2013 Scorecard Example
Color Key (corresponds to performance level achieved)
Maximum
Appropriate Care
Care Coordination
Efficiency
Patient Safety
Value-based Purchasing (VBP)
Clinical Process of Care
Hospital Specific Measures
Target
Threshold
Minimum
Below
Minimum
Rolling 6
Rolling 3
Threshold Minimum (07/12 - 12/12) (10/12 - 12/12)
Points
Weighted Weighted
Value
Points
*
Maximum
Target
47.50
99%
0.2%
47.50
37.50
97%
1.4%
37.50
27.50
95%
2.6%
27.50
17.50
90%
5.5%
17.50
45.00
100%
2.8%
41.43
50.00
100%
2.5%
38.57
1.5
2
0
1.5
25.0%
5.0%
10.0%
30.0%
0.375
0.100
0.000
0.450
99%
97%
95%
90%
99%
100%
2
20.0%
0.400
46.50
36.50
26.50
16.50
40.00
36.67
1.5
10.0%
0.150
Weighted Total Score
Total Composites
1.48
6
*Weights reflect the underlying effort needed to drive
improvement on the composite measure, as well as
how actionable the components of the composite are.
18
BIC 2013 Scorecard Component Measures
Appropriate Care Composite
•
Hospital Outpatient - Emergency Department:
– Median time to ECG (CMS OP-5)*
•
Immunization:
– Influenza vaccination (CMS IMM-2)
– Pneumococcal vaccination (CMS IMM-1)
•
Stroke:
– Discharged on statin medication (TJC STK-6)*
•
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE):
– Appropriate VTE Prophylaxis received by the day after hospital arrival
(BJC PHT)
Blue indicates mandatory measure
* Indicates new to BIC for 2013
19
BIC 2013 Scorecard Component Measures
Care Coordination Composite
•
Stroke:
– Assessed for rehabilitation (STK-10)*
Blue indicates mandatory measure
* Indicates new to BIC for 2013
20
BIC 2013 Scorecard Component Measures
Efficiency Composite
•
Hospital Outpatient - Imaging Efficiency:
– Abdomen CT use of contrast material (CMS OP-10)
– Thorax CT use of contrast material (CMS OP-11)
Blue indicates mandatory measure
* Indicates new to BIC for 2013
21
BIC 2013 Scorecard Component Measures
Patient Safety Composite
•
Healthcare-associated Infections (HAI):
– Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) (NHSN)
– Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) (NHSN)
– Standardized infection ratio for colon surgery surgical site infection
(NHSN)*
– Standardized infection ratio for hysterectomy surgical site infection
(NHSN)*
•
Medication Safety:
– Hypoglycemia event rate per 1,000 at risk patient days (BJC PHT)
•
Preventable Harm:
– Falls with injury per 1,000 patient days (excludes gero-psych units)
(BJC PHT)*
– Pressure ulcer incidence (BJC PHT)*
Blue indicates mandatory measure
* Indicates new to BIC for 2013
22
BIC 2013 Scorecard Component Measures
VBP Clinical Process of Care Composite
•
Acute Myocardial Infarction:
– Primary PCI received within 90 minutes of hospital arrival (CMS AMI-8a)
•
Community-acquired Pneumonia:
– Blood cultures performed in the emergency department prior to initial
antibiotic received in hospital (CMS PN-3b)
– Initial antibiotic selection for CAP in immunocompetent patient (CMS
PN-6)
•
Congestive Heart Failure:
– Discharge instructions (CMS HF-1)
Blue indicates mandatory measure
* Indicates new to BIC for 2013
23
BIC 2013 Scorecard Component Measures
VBP Clinical Process of Care Composite cont.
•
Surgical Care Improvement Project:
– Prophylactic antibiotic received within one hour prior to surgical incision (CMS
SCIP-Inf 1a)
– Prophylactic antibiotic selection for surgical patients (CMS SCIP-Inf 2a)
– Prophylactic antibiotics discontinued within 24 hours after surgery end time (CMS
SCIP-Inf 3a)
– Cardiac surgery patients with controlled 6 A.M. postoperative blood glucose
(CMS SCIP-Inf 4)
– Urinary catheter removed on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) or postoperative day 2
(POD 2) with day of surgery being day zero (CMS SCIP-Inf 9)
– Surgery patients on beta-blocker therapy prior to arrival who received a betablocker during the perioperative period (CMS SCIP-CARD-2)
– Surgery patients with recommended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
ordered (CMS SCIP-VTE 1)
– Surgery patients who received appropriate venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
within 24 hours prior to surgery to 24 hours after surgery (CMS SCIP-VTE 2)
Blue indicates mandatory measure
* Indicates new to BIC for 2013
24
Hospital Specific Metric Selection
• Each hospital has three hospital specific metrics (HSMs)
for BIC 2013
• CCE reviewed individual hospital performance of the
Appropriate Care measures that were moved to Tracked
– Measure performance ≤ 95% = Hospitals must use as
HSM
• If the originally proposed metrics did not provide enough
improvement opportunity or did not have adequate
measurement specifications, hospitals were directed to
select new HSMs.
25
BIC Composite Scoring
• For VBP Processes of Care, Care Coordination, and
Efficiency, the composite is the total achievements over
the total opportunities. Max, target, etc. goals are set
based on the composite score.
• For Appropriate Care, Patient Safety, and Hospital
Specific Measures, the component measures vary in
type. Therefore targets are set for each individual
measure based on a 50 point scale. The composite
score is the average of the component scores.
26
Official 2012 UHC Q & A Scorecard
29
30
Discussion