Executive Summary for Roland Grise Middle School: Instructional Improvement Plan
COMMUNITY BUILDING:
CONTENT PLANNING:
Students will be authentically engaged at least 85% of the time.
Staff will intentionally communicate with students, school and classroom
daily expectations for movement, interaction, and learning weekly. Staff
wll update Powerschool each Tuesday by 5:30pm with student assessments to
improve communication by 10 percent.
The Connect 5, Twitter, and teacher emails will be used to update
families on upcoming events.
Teachers will utilize research-based instructional strategies in the design
of their lesson plans as related to common core 100% of
of the time.
Teachers will differentiate their instruction based on student need
as part of the (Multi-tiered systemt of support) MTSS.
Teachers will select appropriate instructional technology as a tool to enhance
student learning at least bi-weekly.
Teachers will develop learning
and
targets
post them
as daily
INSTRUCTION:
Teachers will implement relevant, meaningful, rigorous instruction 90%
of the time.
Teachers will post learning targets daily.
Students will be engaged in project-based learning technology at least
twice during each quarter.
Teachers will facilitate differentiated instruction in a variety of
onal settings. Teachers will utilize the DOK circles to
deepen ELA discussions.
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING:
Teachers will utilize a variety of quick and informal assessments to assess
the impact of research-based strategies to guide daily instruction.
Teachers will utilize 21st century technology monthly as part of their formative
assessment plan.
Teachers will develop and utilize common formative assessments to guide
instructional planning at least once a week.
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
School Vision and Mission Statements for (insert school name)
Vision:
The vision of Roland-Grise Middle School, in collaboration with parents and community, is to provide children an excellent education in a
healthy and safe learnng environemnt where they are prepared with the critical skills to reach their full potential in a twenty-first century
global society.
Mission:
The vision of Roland-Grise Middle School is to hold high expectations for all students through support and collaboration between our
teachers, students, and parents. All students engaged in 21st century learning and we are utilizing data to assist us in meeting our
objectives. Students' progress is monitored closely through informal and formal observations and all of our decisions are data driven.
Our school is student-centered and our student sleave middle school prepared to tackle all obstacles through the use of critical-thinking
skills.
"all in for students"
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
LEA or Charter Name/Number:
School Name/Number:
School Address:
Plan Year(s):
Date prepared:
New Hanover County Schools - 650
2014-2016
Principal Signature:
Date
Local Board Approval Signature:
Date
School Improvement Team Membership
From GS §115C-105.27: “The principal of each school, representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants assigned
to the school building, and parents of children enrolled in the school shall constitute a school improvement team to develop a school improvement plan to improve student performance.
Representatives of the assistant principals, instructional personnel, instructional support personnel, and teacher assistants shall be elected by their respective groups by secret
ballot....Parents serving on school improvement teams shall reflect the racial and socioeconomic composition of the students enrolled in that school and shall not be members of the
building-level staff.”
Committee Position*
CHAIRPERSON
Principal
Assistant Principal Representative
Teacher Representative
Inst. Support Representative
Teacher Assistant Representative
Parent Representative
Media representative
Student support
grade 6
grade 7
grade 8
math
ela
ss
sci
Parent Representative
Parent Representative
Parent Representative
Parent Representative
Name
Glen Cronin
Dr. Sherry L. Pinto
Chris Vaughan
Kelly Oakley
elin reuben
Purnell Edwards
Heather Black
Jane Tillotson
Gary Francisco
Sylvia Bennett
Liz Jones
Christy Kornegay
Christy Kornegay
Kelly Oakley
Brad Moore
Liz Jones
Jenna Dahlgren
Kellie Savard
Alesha Westbrook
Shellie Whitehurst
Name
Committee Position*
EC Chairperson
AIG specialist
elective rep
Penny DeHart
Elin Reuben
Jen Capps
* Add to list as needed. Each group may have more than one representative.
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Priority Goal 1 and Associated Strategies
School Goal 1:
The proficiency of LEP and SWD students will increase by a minimum of 10% in English Language Arts (ELA) while all others increase by a
minimum of 7%
Supports this district goal:
New Hanover County Schools will achieve 85% proficiency as measured by EOG and EOC test results within the next 3-5 years.
SMART Goal (one- to threeyear projection)
By June of 2015, reading results for percent proficient and growth will increase as outlined in the chart below as measured by EOG
tests.
Growth
Plan/Do
Percent Proficient
English Language Arts
2012-2013
2013-2014
63.9
73.5
2014-2015
2015-2016
2012-2013
2013-2014
met
met
2014-2015
2015-2016
What data supports the SMART Goal above? (Insert data or put data in summary form. If too large, reference the data's location)
2013-2014 ELA Percent Proficient by Subgroup
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
All
American
Indian
Asian
Black
Hisp
2 or more
races
White
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
72.2
68.8
75.0
*
33.3
*
61.1
75.0
72.2
33.3
38.6
53.3
62.5
48.5
42.4
81.3
45.5
86.1
76.8
78.3
79.1
45.3
46.9
58.7
11.1
14.3
22.2
22.2
26.0
32.4
>95
>95
>95
All
American
Indian
LEP
SWD
AIG
79.2
75.8
82.0
*
40.3
*
83.8
55.3
21.1
32.2
85.3
65.9
24.3
36.0
86.1
68.7
32.2
42.4
Information/Data needed that you do not have
>95
>95
>95
2014-2015 ELA Target Goal Percent Proficient by Subgroup
Plan/Do
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
Strengths
1) Strong proficiency data
2) ELA Coach on site
3) Using text and lessons
4) Using wordly wise
5) Strong vocabulary program
6) school-wide broadcast
Asian
Black
Hisp
2 or more
races
68.1
40.3
69.5
82.0
45.6
55.5
79.2
60.3
49.4
Opportunities For Improvement
88.3
52.5
93.1
White
EDS
Achievement gaps in AA, EC, SWD and
LEP student groups
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Goal 1 Improvement Strategies – Identify research-based strategies whenever possible.
Strategy: Implement the SIOP model with our LEP students in the ELA classroom.
Action steps:
Strategy 1:
1. Contact Dr. papamiehl and set up PD on SIOP for appropriate staff
2. Review scheduling of LEP students and adjust as needed to maximize time in SIOP ELA support class
3. Monitor data via ESL teacher for needed mid-course corrections each quarter
Plan/Do
Strategy: Follow a more prescribed method of co-teaching/inclusion in the classrooms for support.
Action steps:
Strategy 2:
1. same steps as in Strategy 1
2.
3.
Strategy: Utilize technologies to assist in accomodating and modifying for student need
Action steps:
Strategy 3:
1. Investigate use of audacity to see if viable for students
Investigate Accessibility suite to see if it provides translation services
Inquire about other technologioes that may assist in accomodations for students
Identify the measures you will use to determine the effectiveness of the strategy.
A. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine
if the strategy was implemented/completed
(Completion Data)
Check
Formative assessment scores
Act
Measure(s)
D. If not successful, what
changes will be made?
Reported When
as completed
B. List the measure(s) the team will use to
determine if the strategy was implemented
correctly (Fidelity)
Formative Measure(s)
Tests and quizzes and
benchmark data
Reported When
as completed
C. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine if the
overall goal was met (Impact)
Summative Measures
EOG scores & ACCESS scores
Reported When
Spring/Summer 2015
Analyze data to determine pattern of error and adjust as needed.
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Priority Goal 2 and Associated Strategies
School Goal 1:
The proficiency of all students will increase by a minimum of 5% in Math, and 7% increase in proficiency for EC, Black and LEP populations.
Supports this district goal:
New Hanover County Schools will achieve 85% proficiency as measured by EOG and EOC test results within the next 3-5 years.
SMART Goal (one- to threeyear projection)
By June of 2015, reading results for percent proficient and growth will increase as outlined in the chart below as measured by EOG
tests.
Plan/Do
Percent Proficient
2012-2013
2013-2014
57.7
66.5
Mathematics
2014-2015
Growth
2015-2016
2012-2013
2013-2014
met
met
2014-2015
2015-2016
What data supports the SMART Goal above? (Insert data or put data in summary form. If too large, reference the data's location)
2013-2014 ELA Percent Proficient by Subgroup
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
All
American
Indian
Asian
Black
Hisp
2 or more
races
White
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
72.0
64.6
64.0
*
*
*
66.7
83.3
83.0
33.3
31.8
35.0
75.0
45.5
36.4
75.0
45.5
83.3
75.5
73.8
67.3
47.3
42.7
44.7
11.1
21.4
33.3
18.5
24.0
25.0
>95
>95
>95
All
American
Indian
LEP
SWD
AIG
77.0
69.6
69.0
*
*
*
80.5
52.3
18.1
25.5
78.8
47.7
28.4
31.0
72.3
49.7
40.3
32.0
Information/Data needed that you do not have
>95
>95
>95
2014-2015 ELA Target Goal Percent Proficient by Subgroup
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
Plan/Do
Strengths
1) Strong proficiency data
2) Coach on site
3) school-wide broadcast
4) specialist support as needed
Asian
Black
Hisp
2 or more
races
71.7
40.3
80.4
88.3
38.8
50.5
88.3
42.0
41.4
Opportunities For Improvement
80.2
50.5
88.3
White
EDS
Achievement gaps in AA, EC, SWD and
LEP student groups
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Goal 1 Improvement Strategies – Identify research-based strategies whenever possible.
Strategy: Utilizing the subject acceleration checklists to more quickly identify students ready to accelerate content
Action steps:
Strategy 1:
1. Have AIG Specialist work with gen ed staff on completing checklists
2. ID students in need of accelerationa nd modify schedules as needed through cluster-group
Monitor their progress for signs of distress and/or success.
Plan/Do
Have structured planning sessions with EC, AIG and instrcutional coaches on fridays as scheduled.
Strategy 2:
Schedule teachers/teams
Set agendas based on need
Follow up
Strategy 3:
1.
2.
3.
Identify the measures you will use to determine the effectiveness of the strategy.
A. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine
if the strategy was implemented/completed
(Completion Data)
Check
Formative assessment scores
Act
Measure(s)
D. If not successful, what
changes will be made?
Reported When
as completed
B. List the measure(s) the team will use to
determine if the strategy was implemented
correctly (Fidelity)
Formative Measure(s)
Tests and quizzes and
benchmark data
Reported When
as completed
C. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine if the
overall goal was met (Impact)
Summative Measures
EOG scores & ACCESS scores
Reported When
Spring/Summer 2015
Analyze data to determine pattern of error and adjust as needed.
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Priority Goal 3 and Associated Strategies
School Goal 1:
The proficiency of all students will increase by a minimum of 3% in Science and 5% increase for LEP and SWD students.
Supports this district goal:
New Hanover County Schools will achieve 85% proficiency as measured by EOG and EOC test results within the next 3-5 years.
SMART Goal (one- to threeyear projection)
By June of 2015, reading results for percent proficient and growth will increase as outlined in the chart below as measured by EOG
tests.
Plan/Do
Percent Proficient
Science
2012-2013
2013-2014
77.8
86.5
2014-2015
Growth
2015-2016
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
met
What data supports the SMART Goal above? (Insert data or put data in summary form. If too large, reference the data's location)
2013-2014 ELA Percent Proficient by Subgroup
8th grade
All
American
Indian
Asian
Black
Hisp
2 or more
races
White
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
79.0
*
66.7
50.0
50.0
91.7
83.6
61.9
11.1
39.1
>95
All
American
Indian
Asian
Black
Hisp
2 or more
races
White
EDS
LEP
SWD
AIG
82.0
*
69.7
53.0
53.0
94.7
86.6
64.9
16.1
44.1
>95
2014-2015 ELA Target Goal Percent Proficient by Subgroup
8th grade
Opportunities For Improvement: Fidelity to use
of techbook, science kits not optimal
Information/Data needed that you do not have
Plan/Do
Strengths : NCVPS, proficiency data, extracurricular
opportunities, STEM focus opportunities
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Goal 1 Improvement Strategies – Identify research-based strategies whenever possible.
Strategy: Integrating technology class and other electives curricula with the science class curricula
Action steps:
Strategy 1:
1. Provide teachers with PD as needed on science techbook
2.
3.
Plan/Do
Strategy: Increase STEM/community outreach involvement: Utilizing STEM
Action steps:
Strategy 2:
1. USE PTSO and parents as respurces for STEM involvement especially with female youth.
2.
3.
Strategy: Utilize a blended/compacting learning model for curriculum
Action steps:
Strategy 3:
1. Occurring through NVCPS coordinator and gen ed teachers
2.
3.
Identify the measures you will use to determine the effectiveness of the strategy.
A. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine
if the strategy was implemented/completed
(Completion Data)
Check
Formative assessment scores
Act
Measure(s)
D. If not successful, what
changes will be made?
Reported When
B. List the measure(s) the team will use to
determine if the strategy was implemented
correctly (Fidelity)
Formative Measure(s)
as completed & including Tests and quizzes and
NCVPS reports
benchmark data
Reported When
as completed
C. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine if the
overall goal was met (Impact)
Summative Measures
EOC & EOG scores
Reported When
Spring/Summer 2015
Analyze data to determine pattern of error and adjust as needed.
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Priority Goal 4 and Associated Strategies
School Goal 1:
The number of students in grades six, seven and eight combined in the first -third quartiles will decrease by 10% and the numbers in the fourth
quartile will increase by 10 percent.
Supports this district goal:
New Hanover County Schools will achieve 85% proficiency as measured by final exam results within the next 3-5 years.
SMART Goal (one- to threeyear projection)
By June of 2015, reading results for percent proficient and growth will increase as outlined in the chart below as measured by final
exam quartile results
Percent Proficient
Plan/Do
2012-2013
2013-2014
Social Studies
2014-2015
Growth
2015-2016
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
LEP
SWD
AIG
LEP
SWD
AIG
27.9
What data supports the SMART Goal above? (Insert data or put data in summary form. If too large, reference the data's location)
2013-2014 SS Percent Proficient by Subgroup
All
quartiles 1&2
quartile 3
quartile 4
American
Indian
Asian
30.2
41.8
27.9
Black
Hisp
52.9
38.2
8.9
55.8
37.2
7.0
2 or more
races
White
EDS
28.0
54.7
17.3
2014-2015 SS Target Goal Percent Proficient by Subgroup
All
American
Indian
Black
Hisp
2 or more
races
42.9
45.8
28.2
27.2
18.9
17.0
Opportunities For Improvement: Student
subgroups still a concern include sWD, LEP
White
EDS
18.0
44.7
27.3
Information/Data needed that you do not have
Plan/Do
quartiles 1&2
20.2
quartile 3
31.8
quartile 4
37.9
Strengths: NCVPS compacted blended class
Asian
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Goal 1 Improvement Strategies – Identify research-based strategies whenever possible.
Strategy: Focus more on primary source documents and higher level thinking
Action steps:
Strategy 1:
1. Work with Travis Natthews to continue to access primary document resources
2.
3.
Plan/Do
Strategy: Implement the SIOP model with our LEP students in the ELA classroom.
Action steps:
Strategy 2:
1. Contact Dr. papamiehl and set up PD on SIOP for appropriate staff
2. Review scheduling of LEP students and adjust as needed to maximize time in SIOP support class in technical vocabulary
3. Monitor data via ESL teacher for needed mid-course corrections each quarter
Investigate assessment opportunities to adjust instruction
Action steps:
Strategy 3:
1. Monitor PBL methods of teachers and ensure that students are focusing on technical vocabulary
2.
3.
Identify the measures you will use to determine the effectiveness of the strategy.
A. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine
if the strategy was implemented/completed
(Completion Data)
Check
student grades
Act
Measure(s)
D. If not successful, what
changes will be made?
Reported When
each Tuesday in
powerschool
B. List the measure(s) the team will use to
determine if the strategy was implemented
correctly (Fidelity)
Formative Measure(s)
performance based
products
C. List the measure(s) the team will use to determine if the
overall goal was met (Impact)
Reported When
as completed
Summative Measures
Final exams
Reported When
Jun-15
Analyze data to detemrine patter of erro and adjust accordingly for new school year
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Safe School Plan for (insert school name)
State Law SL 2011-145 (HB 200) Appropriations Act of 2011, and SL 2011-391 (HB 22) Technical corrections to the
Appropriations Act of 2011, requires a school safety plan be developed by each school. The school-level plan must address
any safety and discipline concerns of the school.
Name and role of person(s)
responsible for implementing this
plan:
Dr Sherry Pinto, principal
Statement of Responsibility for the School District Superintendent
The district superintendent is responsible for coordinating adoption and implementation of this plan, evaluating the principal's
performance with respect to school safety, monitoring and evaluating implementation of this plan at the school-level, and
coordinating with local law enforcement and court officials as appropriate.
New Hanover County Schools District Safety/Emergency Operations Plan is available at: (http://www.nhcs.net/crisisplan/)
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Statement of Responsibility for the School Principal
The school principal is responsible for restoring, if necessary, and maintaining a safe, secure, and orderly school environment.
The duties of the principal with respect to this include exhibiting appropriate leadership for school personnel and students,
providing for alternative placements for students who are seriously disruptive, reporting all criminal acts, and providing
appropriate disciplinary consequences for disruptive students.
Statement of the Roles of Other Administrators, Teachers, and Other School Personnel
School personnel are tasked as follows with restoring, if necessary, and maintaining a safe, secure, and orderly school
environment:
Assistant Principal(s): Chris Vaughan, John Branson
Teachers:
Teacher Assistants:
Other School Staff: Front office staff, school nurse, guidance counselors
Services for At-risk Students
The following procedures are used to identify and serve the needs of students at-risk of academic failure, or of engaging in
disruptive or disorderly behavior, or both.
We are utilizing the county-wide MTSS program to identify stduents at risk both for academics and for behavioral concerns.
Through the use of a database program, we will track thes etsudents and utilize proper tools and paperwork to move students through the
process as needed.
Students who participate in acvtivities that fall under policy 6410 will be reprimanded according to said policy.
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
The following mechanisms are used for assessing the needs of disruptive and disorderly students who are at risk of academic
failure, providing these students with services to assist them in achieving academically and modifying their behavior, and for
removing them from classrooms when necessary.
WE utilize our iSS program and use electronic speadsheets as a means to track students to detemrine patterns of behavior, etc.
We utilize a bounce policy miminally as not to disrupt othert classrooms without fair warning and effort to try other means.
The staff did receive training in mindset verbal deescalationa nd the appropriate staff are certified as mindset restraint-trained.
We utilize ABE as our disciplinary data management system and utilize the Modules accordingly.
We have added a bell at 2:40 to decrease tardies to mastery.
Deputy Bennett debriefs us as needed on safety/crisis procedural issues.
The following services are provided to students assigned to an alternative school or an alternative learning program.
n/a
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
The following measurable (goals) for improving school safety and order are in place. (Copy as needed depending upon
number of goals.)
Goal:
Target:
Goal:
Target:
Goal:
Target:
Add e-access units on specifci locations of exterior doors
Fall 2014
Add buzzer to main entry
Spring 2015
The following measures are used to determine the effectiveness of the school's efforts to assist at-risk students, including
effectiveness of procedures. (Alternative Learning Programs).
Target:
Target:
Target:
The following planned or recently completed professional development aligns with the goals of our safe school initiative:
Professional Development
monthly crisis meetings
Minset training
Planned/Completed
monthly
Oct-14
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Funding Uses and Sources – At-risk and Alternative Learning Schools and Programs
Program or Strategy Being Funded
Amount of Funding
Source of Funding
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Title I School-wide Compliance Review and Plan
A comprehensive school improvement plan must address all of the components defined in the Elementary and Secondary Education
Act (Section 1114(b) of Title I). Each required component is described below, with an explanation of how each contributes to the
creation of a successful schoolwide program. The goals and strategies you've already developed may fulfill many of these
requirements.
Schoolwide reform strategies: Instructional strategies and initiatives in the comprehensive plan must be based on scientifically
based research, strengthen the core academic program, increase the quality and quantity of learning time, and address the learning
needs of all students in the school.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school is addressing the need for schoolwide reform in the following ways, in addition to our focus on the priority goals
listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Instruction by highly qualified teachers: High poverty, low-performing schools are sometimes staffed with disproportionately high
numbers of teachers who are not highly qualified. To address this disproportionality, the ESEA requires that all teachers of core
academic subjects and instructional paraprofessionals (employees of a LEA who provide instructional support) in a schoolwide
program school meet the qualifications required by section 1119. Student achievement increases in schools where teaching and
learning have the highest priority, and students achieve at higher levels when taught by teachers who know their subject matter and are
skilled in teaching it.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school is addressing the need for highly qualified teachers in the following ways, in addition to our focus on the priority
goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
High-quality and ongoing professional development: Teachers and other staff in schoolwide program schools must be equipped
to face the challenge of helping all students meet the State’s academic achievement standards. To do this, they must be familiar with
the goals and objectives of the schoolwide plan, and receive the sustained, high-quality professional development required to
implement them. The statute requires that professional development be extended, as appropriate, to those who partner with teachers
to support student achievement, such as principals, paraprofessionals, and parents.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school provides high quality, on-going professional development in the following ways, in addition to our focus on the
priority goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Strategies to attract highly qualified teachers to high-need schools: Although recruiting and retaining highly qualified teachers is
an on-going challenge in high poverty schools, low-performing students in these schools have a special need for excellent teachers.
Therefore, the schoolwide plan must describe the strategies it will use to attract and retain highly qualified teachers.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following strategies to attract highly qualified teachers to our high-need schools, in addition to our
focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Strategies to increase parental involvement: Research continues to demonstrate that successful schools have significant and
sustained levels of parental involvement. Therefore, it is important that schoolwide plans contain strategies to involve parents in the
school community. Additionally, state law requires parent representation on every school's improvement team, and federal
requirements specify that each school must develop: 1) an approach for communication with parents, 2) activities to involve parents,
and 3) an approach for training parents to better understand how to help their children excel in school.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following strategies to increase parental involvement, in addition to our focus on the priority goals
listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Plans for assisting preschool students in the successful transition from early childhood programs to local elementary
schoolwide programs: This component emphasizes the value of creating a coherent and seamless educational program for at-risk
students. Early childhood programs, including Early Reading First and others, provide a foundation for later academic success, and
effective schoolwide programs capitalize on this strong start.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following pre-school-to-elementary transition strategies, in addition to our focus on the priority goals
listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Measures to include teachers in decisions regarding the use of academic assessments: In addition to State assessment results,
teachers need current and ongoing assessment data that describe student achievement. These data often come from less formal
assessments, such as observation, performance assessments, or end-of-course tests. The schoolwide program should provide
teachers with professional development that increases their understanding of the appropriate uses of multiple assessment measures
and how to use assessment results to improve instruction.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following strategies for developing teacher skills in formative assessment, in addition to our focus on
the priority goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty attaining proficiency receive effective and timely additional
assistance: The schoolwide program school must identify students who need additional learning time to meet standards and provide
them with timely, additional assistance that is tailored to their needs. This assistance must be available to all students in the school
who need it.
Priority Goal 1
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following differentiation strategies, in addition to our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Coordination and integration of Federal, State, and local services and programs: Schoolwide program schools are expected to
use the flexibility available to them to integrate services and programs with the aim of upgrading the entire educational program and
helping all students reach proficient and advanced levels of achievement. In addition to coordinating and integrating services,
schoolwide program schools may combine most Federal, State and local funds to provide those services. Exercising this option
maximizes the impact of the resources available to carry out the schoolwide program.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following strategies to coordinate and integrate federal, state, and local services and programs, in
addition to our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Compliance Review and Plan for Schools in Title I School Improvement
Each school identified for Title I School Improvement must, no later than three months after notification that the school is in Title I
School Improvement, develop or revise its school plan. This plan must be developed in consultation with parents, school staff, the
local education agency serving the school, and outside experts. The plan must cover a two-year period.
Professional development requirements: Schools in Title I School Improvement must 1) provide assurance that the school will
spend not less than 10 percent of its Title I funds each year for high quality professional development, 2) specify how these
professional development funds will be used to remove the school from school improvement status, and 3) incorporate a teacher
mentor program.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school is addressing these three additional professional development requirements in the following ways, in addition to
our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Notification to parents: Schools in Title I School Improvement must describe specifically how the school will provide written notice
about the identification of the school as a Title I School Improvement school to the parents of each student enrolled in the school.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school is providing written notification to parents in the following manner:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
School, district and state agency responsibilities: Schools in Title I School Improvement are required to clearly define the
responsibilities of the school, LEA, and SEA in implementing improvement strategies. LEAs are minimally required to offer technical
assistance in the form of data analysis, budget analysis, and identification and implementation of improvement strategies. State-level
assistance may include provision of a state-wide system of support, including allocation of funding and other technical assistance.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school, the school district, and the state education agency are supporting improvement of our school in the following
ways:
School:
LEA:
SEA:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Strategies to increase parental involvement: Research continues to demonstrate that successful schools have significant and
sustained levels of parental involvement. Therefore, it is important that targeted assistance programs develop strategies to involve
parents of Title I students in the school community. Additionally, state law requires parent representation on every school's
improvement team, and federal requirements specify that each school must develop: 1) an approach for communication with parents,
2) activities to involve parents, and 3) an approach for training parents to better understand how to help their children excel in school.
Priority Goal 1
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following strategies to increase parental involvement, in addition to our focus on the priority goals
listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Coordination and integration of Federal, State, and local services and programs: Targeted assistance program schools are
expected to coordinate and integrate services, with other Federal, State and local programs and services.
Priority Goal 1
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following strategies to coordinate and integrate federal, state, and local services and programs, in
addition to our focus on the priority goals listed in this plan:
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)
Plans must support and coordinate with regular education programs: Effective targeted assistance programs capitalize on strong
support and coordination with regular education programs. This component emphasizes the value of creating a coherent and seamless
educational program for at-risk students. This may include transitioning students from early childhood programs such as Early Reading
First and others to provide a foundation for later academic success.
Priority Goal 1
Priority Goal 2
Priority Goal 3
This school improvement plan
addresses this requirement.
Please see the priority goals and
strategies noted to the right:
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Strategy 3
Our school uses the following strategies to support and coordinate with the regular education program, in addition to our
Revised February 2015 (revisions in red)