MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH Global Currency Research Team For research analysts, please see contact list at the back of this material. Click to search for research by currency March 12, 2015 Currencies Global FX Pulse Patient on the Dollar Dialing Back Some Exposure. After posting very large gains at the start of the month, we think the USD rally may see a temporary respite with recent growth numbers disappointing expectations. Specifically, the latest data on domestic demand suggest that the US consumer is saving, rather than spending, income gains from lower oil prices – weighing on estimates for Q1 growth. As such, with markets pushing back expectations on the timing of the first rate hike, we pare back half of our USD longs this week, focusing on the high-yielders. Remaining Short AXJ. Despite paring back USD longs against high-beta FX, we remain committed to our AXJ shorts. Indeed, the Asian REERs have continued to move significantly higher over the past few months with the EUR depreciation seen year-to-date. We believe this trend is unsustainable, given the net tightening it represents in an environment of generally slowing growth in the region, driven by China. In line with this thinking, AXJ central banks in the region have acted, with the BoT and BoK cutting interest rates this week. We remain long USD/THB and have added a long JPY/KRW position to our portfolio. Wages in Japan, a key focus for Abenomics, have begun to turn higher. This suggests less need for a significantly weaker JPY to reflate the economy. Hitting Targets. We reached targets on both our short SGD/INR and long USD/CHF trades and have thus taken profits. Elsewhere, we close our long USD exposure against high-beta AUD, and tighten the stop on long USD/TRY. We continue to use EUR as a funder, and short it against INR and SEK. We favor long CLP/COP. This Week’s Edition We look at USD performance leading up to and following the first rate hike in previous tightening cycles. History suggests USD appreciation in the six months before the first hike, and depreciation in the subsequent six months. While we may see a similar pattern this time around, extraordinarily low rates elsewhere in the globe and the increasing rotation of funding away from the dollar suggest USD may continue to rally, even post tightening. Closed Trades Short SGD/INR Long USD/CHF Short AUD/USD Active Orders Long USD/THB Long USD/PEN Short EUR/INR Long USD/TRY Short EUR/SEK Long USD/ILS Long CLP/COP Limit Orders Buy JPY/KRW Options Trades Long EUR Put/USD Call Short EUR Put/USD Call Entry Stop Target Closed at 45.00 on Mar 9, 2015 Closed at 1.00 on Mar 10, 2015 Close at NY Close Mar 12, 2015 Entry Stop 32.78 32.00 3.0690 3.0690 71.05 68.50 2.46 2.55 9.20 9.20 3.99 3.90 4.10 4.02 Entry Stop Enter at NY Close Mar 12, 2015 Entry Date Expiry Date 05-Feb-15 07-May-15 05-Feb-15 07-May-15 Target 35.00 3.2600 64.00 2.75 8.88 4.25 4.28 Target Strike 1.1250 1.0850 See page 11 for more details. Changes in stops/targets in bold italics. MS Major Currency Forecasts EUR/USD USD/JPY GBP/USD USD/CHF USD/CAD AUD/USD NZD/USD EUR/SEK EUR/NOK USD/ZAR USD/TRY USD/RUB EUR/PLN EUR/HUF USD/CNY USD/INR USD/KRW USD/SGD USD/BRL USD/MXN 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1.12 118 1.48 0.91 1.27 0.77 0.71 9.50 8.70 11.65 2.36 66.00 4.33 320 6.16 62.5 1190 1.34 2.65 14.7 1.08 120 1.44 0.93 1.30 0.75 0.68 9.60 8.90 11.75 2.42 68.00 4.35 322 6.13 62.5 1210 1.36 2.75 14.9 1.06 124 1.39 0.99 1.33 0.72 0.66 9.70 9.20 12.05 2.47 70.00 4.35 324 6.12 62.3 1230 1.38 2.85 15.0 1.05 127 1.38 1.02 1.35 0.69 0.65 9.50 9.30 12.30 2.52 72.00 4.35 325 6.09 62.5 1230 1.40 2.90 15.1 Note: Forecasts for end-of-period. G10 and EM forecasts updated on January 22, 2015. AUDUSD and NZDUSD updated on Feb 5, 2015. FX Market Overview P2 Fed Tightening Cycles and USD P7 Technical Chart of the Week – EUR/USD P10 Strategic FX Portfolio Trade Recommendations P11 G10 & EM Currency Summary P15 Global Event Risk Calendar P17 FX Volatility/Carry Grids, Tactical Indicators P19 MS FX Positioning Tracker P21 Macro Forecasts FX Forecasts P22 P24 For important disclosures, refer to the Disclosures Section, located at the end of this report. MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse FX Overview Hans Redeker, Sheena Shah The EUR decline has become the dominant market theme with more weakness in store… …even if EMU’s economy looks set to rebound. The ECB’s aggressive QE operation, negative net bond issuance (after purchases) and legislative requirements have created an environment where EUR-denominated AAA bonds are in short supply. The aggressive ECB stance suggests that for now the performance of the EUR will remain data independent. One day the ECB may tell us that the EUR has fallen enough; however, given the degree at which EMU inflation rates have undershot the ECB’s ‘near 2%’ target, taking unemployment miles above NAIRU, the ECB seems to be in no rush to bring the current EUR slide to a halt. Exhibit 1 EUR Has Taken on the Status of a Liability Currency… The unsettled Greek situation means the EUR is starting to attract a risk-discount, bringing our 0.90 EURUSD bear case target for year-end into play. The weakening EUR increases deflationary pressure elsewhere, increasing the pace of monetary easing in lowflationary Asia. Japan’s wage growth has accelerated. The JPY should maintain its position as an outperformer, suggesting JPY crosses could fall further. The USD rally looks set to pause as recent US data suggest the Fed could push back the timing of its first rate hike. ECB Weakens the EUR The ECB started its €60bln per month balance sheet expansion last Monday, with purchases showing the desired effect. EMU bond yields have declined, widening yield differentials against the EUR and putting the currency under selling pressure. We believe there is more to come. While real money investors, such as insurance companies, continue to offload euros in large quantities, the leveraged community and non-EMU based corporates have gone into the latest EUR decline with relatively light EUR positions. The ECB has given the green light for the EUR to weaken, in our view. We reach this conclusion by analyzing ECB action and rhetoric. Combining negative deposit rates with a QE operation undermines FX. Banks have to pay to hold deposits with the ECB, while core EMU bond yields still trade at a premium relative to the minus 0.2% deposit rate. This suggests that banks are channeling funds into bonds instead of bearing the holding cost of having deposits with the ECB. The yield differential to the rest of the world is now substantial, suggesting foreign asset holdings have become an attractive alternative to holding negative yield-generating deposits with the ECB. . Source: Macrobond, Morgan Stanley Research Market participants have noticed this decisiveness. Non-EMU based non-financial corporates have increased issuance in EUR, but then swap the proceeds, with a tendency to convert the EUR into hard currencies such as the USD or GBP in order to repay USD or GBP-denominated debt. Exhibit 2 …Dictated by Yield Differentials Source: Macrobond, Morgan Stanley Research Our EURUSD 1.05 year-end target has been reached early. What was an aggressive call only a few months ago has turned out to be far too moderate. This type of experience is rare. It turns out that our EUR bear case scenario is coming into play. We built this scenario around political and economic 2 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse risks in Greece becoming material, forcing the ECB to run a more aggressive monetary policy approach. This scenario suggests EURUSD falling to levels near 0.90 over the course of this year. Side Effects of EUR Weakness The ECB’s autonomous EUR weakening strategy has pushed EUR crosses sharply lower. EUR weakness has become a global issue. While the ECB may be excused for pushing the EUR lower – as there are almost no alternative monetary strategies available – EUR weakness still comes with global costs. Reflation via FX provides a globally zero-sum game. EMU’s reflation comes at the expense of EMU’s trading partners. The additional product that EMU should sell to export markets, due to FX-improved competitiveness, will be an additional product that is not sold by somebody else. Local reflation has to translate into global reflation to make a difference. No Carry Yet Often we hear that the better EMU growth outlook will lead to spillover effects, as other economies benefit from rising EMU demand. However, we disagree: inasmuch as EMU reflation is driven by the FX rate, support to EMU growth will come at the expense of EMU’s trading partners. Global versus local reflation will make the difference between markets placing funds into carry trades or markets maintaining their current stance – namely to sell currencies exposed to foreign vulnerabilities and currencies that run the risk of getting trapped in a combination of low inflation, over-capacity and excessive private sector debt. We think the latter will dominate trading, keeping the carry theme focused on just a couple of currencies including the INR. Otherwise, we stay away from the carry theme for now. Local versus Global Reflation Nonetheless, the fundamentals need to be watched in order to make judgments concerning local versus global reflation. The US economy is inward-looking with net exports comprising only 11% of GDP, suggesting the FX rate will limit activity only marginally. Low funding costs and credit availability are more important for an inward-looking economy. Hence, US reflation may be slowed down, but not derailed by the higher USD. Naturally, the US will provide demand for the global economy. The point we make here concerns emerging markets, in particular AxJ, and their ability to reflate in an environment of EUR weakness and USD strength. Exhibit 3 differentiates countries experiencing a tradeweighted FX appreciation from economic areas where the real effective exchange rate has depreciated. China leads the first group, while EMU leads the latter. Chinese data have remained weak while EMU’s data have improved. This finding argues that there is local reflation in EMU. Global reflation has remained non-existent for now. For us to become more constructive, we would need to see countries with currency appreciation reporting better data. There will be a lag before the effects of recent FX moves show up in economic data. Therefore Exhibit 3 is not yet conclusive. However our view regarding this subject is clear. For reflation to become global, it is mainly Asian data that will have to improve. Exhibit 3 TWI Changes and PMIs USD CNY INR GBP KRW CHF TRY ZAR NZD ILS AUD IDR HUF PLN CAD CZK SEK JPY EUR MXN NOK BRL RUB TWI (YoY) 13% 12% 10% 9% 6% 3% 3% 1% -3% -3% -3% -4% -4% -4% -5% -5% -5% -7% -8% -10% -12% -14% -31% PMI 6m change -3.20 0.50 0.20 2.70 2.30 -4.20 -0.80 -0.80 -7.80 3.40 -1.06 -3.20 2.20 5.60 -8.90 0.00 -0.10 -0.10 0.70 1.80 1.70 0.30 -0.70 PMI today 52.9 50.7 51.2 54.1 51.1 47.3 49.6 49.6 50.9 53.3 45.4 47.5 54.9 55.1 49.7 55.6 53.3 51.6 51 54.4 51.2 49.6 49.7 PMI 6m ago 56.1 50.2 51 51.4 48.8 51.5 50.4 50.4 58.7 49.9 46.5 50.7 52.7 49.5 58.6 55.6 53.4 51.7 50.3 52.6 49.5 49.3 50.4 Source: Bloomberg, Haver Analytics, Morgan Stanley Research China Feeling the Pain The sharply lower EUR has pushed China’s RMB TWI higher. Financial conditions have tightened via the FX rate. China needs monetary accommodation, but what it gets instead is tightness via the FX rate. Lower rates and a further reduction of minimum reserve rates looks almost warranted (See China Economics: More easing needed despite M2 rebound, March 12, 2014), but there is still the question concerning the lower efficiency of the credit multiplier. Our point is that an economy running debt-financed overcapacity will respond to monetary 3 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse accommodation less euphorically compared to a balanced economy. Exhibit 5 …Not Boding Well for the AUD AxJ Stays on the Radar AxJ with its substantial trading relationship to China, its low capacity utilization rates, and higher USD dependency is likely to stay weak too. The Bank of Thailand cutting interest rates by 25bps to 1.75% this week, citing low nominal GDP growth and stability risks associated with EMU’s QE program, indicates that EMU has not only exported deflation via its weak EUR but, as well, monetary accommodation. The weaker the EUR becomes, the bigger these pressures. In many cases, EUR crosses have reached levels that put local economies under increasing competitive pressure. We remind ourselves about observations made when the JPY declined by 45% over the past couple years. Initially, AxJ currencies stayed stable as the JPY was seen correcting its ‘overvaluation’. However, in the later stage of the JPY move, AxJ moved lower along with the JPY. We reckon that further EUR weakness will now lead to a similar exchange rate reaction among countries directly or indirectly competing with EMU. Consequently, the USD rally is likely to broaden out from here. We see three risks to our view. First, the ECB stops ‘banging the table’ for further EUR weakness; second, local reflation turns into global reflation, and third, the US economy shows weaker data. None of these risks seem significant to us right now, although we keep a close eye especially on the third one. Exhibit 4 China’s Financial Conditions Have Tightened… Source: Bloomberg, Haver Analytics, Morgan Stanley Research US Bond Yields and FX The US bond market provides a benchmark for other economies, with this being especially true for USD- or quasiUSD-pegged environments. The wide spread between nominal US yields and the nominal GDP expansion rate suggests that bond-market-related monetary accommodation has become significant. There is little doubt that the US economy can withstand higher funding costs. The question, however, is what would the impact of higher US funding costs be for the rest of the world? Will higher US bond yields introduce a dose of volatility into international markets, increasing the quantity of debt-related inflows into the US, thus pushing yields back down again? Recent market activity suggests that the answer to both questions is that the sharp rise in debt in many non-US economies has increased funding cost sensitivities, leading to higher local savings via balance sheet consolidation, which, in the absence of local investment opportunities, lead to capital outflows and subsequent inflows into the US bond market. Against this background, we think US bond yields may find it difficult to work their way higher. Source: Bloomberg, Haver Analytics, Morgan Stanley Research 4 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Exhibit 6 Global Debt Increases Show Divergence… 400% 350% % change in total debt since 2007 300% 250% 200% 150% Secondly, 10-year JGB yields have shot up from the 0.19% January low, reaching 0.45% post-the non-farm payrolls print. Japan’s wages picking up should increase bond yields further, increasing the relative attractiveness of JPY-denominated holdings. Exhibit 8 compares USDJPY relative to US bond yields. Above, we explained why US bond yields should only increase gradually. Currently, USDJPY trades too high relative to US bond yields. Third, the bulk of Japan’s portfolio adjustments into higheryielding asset classes have been completed. While Japan will still report outflows, we expect the pace of the outflows to decline, which would be JPY-supportive. 100% 50% 0% Exhibit 8 USD/JPY Trading Higher Relative to US Yields Source: Haver Analytics, Morgan Stanley Research Exhibit 7 … Especially So in the Private Sector 500% 450% 400% 350% 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% % change in debt levels since 2007 EM EM US Total US Private Sector Source: Haver Analytics, Morgan Stanley Research Source: Macrobond, Morgan Stanley Research Exhibit 9 Flows into Local Japanese Assets We Are Not Bearish on JPY Japan’s wage growth, a key variable for the success of ‘Abenomics’, seems to be picking up (see Japan Economics: J-Insight: Faster: Cyclical and Structural Reasons for the Acceleration of Wages (12 Mar 2015)). Higher wages will not only lend support to domestic demand conditions, but will also allow inflation to reach the BoJ’s 2% target. Importing inflation via JPY weakness would no longer be required. There are important conclusions to draw from this. First, Japan’s equity market, which in the past required the help of a weak JPY to perform, should find its currently-tight negative correlation with the JPY easing. Foreign equityrelated inflows have been mostly currency-hedged, but should the negative correlation between stocks and the JPY ease, FX-hedged equity investors may reduce currently high FX hedging ratios, which could spark a wave of JPY buying. Source: Haver Analytics, Morgan Stanley Research 5 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Our Trading Recommendations Some of our bullish USD positions have hit target. While we remain committed to our long USD positions versus low-beta FX, we pare back longs against the high-yielders. Thus we take off our USD long against the AUD and also tighten our stop on USDTRY to lock in profit. The weak US retail sales report has put our US GDP tracker down to 1.2% for 1Q, significantly lower than the 3% levels it was at earlier this year. The USD rally may pause for now. A similar pattern emerged in early February, then lasting for three weeks. The Fed statement due on Wednesday is likely to refer to international developments reducing US rate hike expectations, which could put the USD under further corrective downward pressure tactically. Accordingly, we look into non-USD related trades. An interesting opportunity emerges in the JPY. The consensus is JPY bearish. We are not. Our JPY optimism is fed by Japan’s wage data suggesting that inflation no longer requires the help of JPY weakness. We like JPYKRW longs benefiting from rate and yield differentials, working more in favor of the JPY. The BoK has cut rates as its economy has weakened and inflation heads lower (Economics & Strategy Insights: Korea: Household Debt Concerns Could Mean More FX Policy, February 9, 2014). The risk to this trade is USDJPY heading higher with US yields. The FOMC meeting will be key this coming week. See Strategic FX Pulse Recommendations, page 11. 6 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Fed Tightening Cycles and USD Evan Brown, Charles Rubenfeld The USD rally to date has more to do with developments outside than inside the US. This will likely shift as the Fed moves toward the exit. In previous Fed tightening cycles, USD appreciated in the six months leading up to the first hike and depreciated in the following six months. Even in the 1994-1995 tightening cycle, when the market was forced to aggressively price in a more hawkish Fed, USD sold off. In line with history we expect further USD strength in the lead up to the first Fed hike. But investors should be prepared for a downward correction after the Fed starts tightening, especially given USD’s aggressive rally to date. Still, USD could continue to rally even after the Fed hikes as low interest rates elsewhere influence funding and hedging decisions. the curve may rise quickly (US Interest Rate Strategist: Get Ready to Rumble, March 5, 2015). Exhibit 1 22% USD Move Since July More About RoW than US 2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 US 5y Swap Rate Average G10 ex-US 5y Swap Rate Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research Exhibit 2 Pricing Out Fed Hikes Didn’t Disrupt USD Trend The USD Bull Market: (Not) Born in the USA 6 One could argue that much of the USD’s acceleration since July 2014 has been more about developments abroad than those in the US. Since July we’ve had several European central banks cut rates into negative territory, the BoJ expand asset purchases and encourage outflows from its pension funds, and the ECB finally launch a quantitative easing program. Just in the first few months of this year, 20 major central banks have eased policy. 90 In contrast, the Fed’s movement toward rate normalization has been very gradual. Take the 5-year swap rate in the US versus the average ex-US G10 rate since USD TWI began its 22% move, for example (Exhibit 1). While volatile, the US rate is now more or less where it was at the start of the USD TWI move while average rates outside of the US fell 65 bps. Note, too, that the USD uptrend remained intact even during periods when the market was pricing out Fed rate hikes (Exhibit 2). 70 13 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Trade Weighted USD Index M1KE (RHS) But the epicenter of the USD’s strength may be shifting. st Morgan Stanley’s M1KE (Months to 1 Hike) indicator is now just above 6 months, implying a first full 25 bps tightening in September. And the pace of tightening priced in remains well below the FOMC’s own projections (the dots). Should the market move closer to the Fed’s own forecasts, yields across 7 8 85 9 80 10 11 75 12 Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research With the ECB having fired its bullets, the BoJ in wait-and-see mode and several central banks pressing pause in their easing cycles (BoC, NBP), USD direction will increasingly be ‘made in America.’ Our US Economics team maintains an outof-consensus call for Fed tightening only in 1Q 2016, but notes that a pickup in wage growth, an earlier bottoming in core PCE inflation or change in Fed rhetoric will inform the forecast (see US Economics: The Fed Call and Data Dependency, March 3, 2015). Whether a year or three months from now, the Fed is highly likely to begin a tightening cycle, the time and pacing of which will have meaningful implications for USD. As such we take a look at previous 7 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse tightening cycles and USD performance before, during and after. What Happens When the Fed Hikes? Exhibits 3 and 4 chart the trade-weighted USD during the last three tightening cycles: 1994-1995, 1999-2000 and 20042006. In all three instances USD appreciated in the months leading up to the first hike, but depreciated in the months afterwards even as the Fed continued tightening. Six months before the first hike, TWI rose by an average of 4%. In the following six months, USD depreciated by an average of 5%. Exhibit 3 exporting capital abroad in search of higher yielding opportunities. In contrast to the 2004-2006 tightening cycle, the one in 19992000 came during a multi-year secular USD bull market. And yet USD still sold off in the initial months after the first hike. 1999-2000’s tightening cycle was similar to that in 2004-2006 in that the timing and speed of hikes held few surprises. In the first few months after the initial 1999 hike, the ECB tightened more aggressively than the Fed, temporarily compressing US-European rate spreads. Once the ECB was done, USD regained momentum. But what if the first rate hike was a hawkish surprise? That was the case in 1994, which marked the first time the Fed released a statement communicating action after an FOMC meeting. Two-year yields shot up to price in much tighter policy than was previously anticipated. But even so, the USD depreciated materially after the first hike and throughout the tightening process, In fact, USD had begun to decline a few weeks ahead of tightening. USD TWI During Fed Hiking Cycles USD TWI (Hiking Cycles Shaded) 115 110 105 100 95 90 Exhibit 5 85 1994 the Lone Hawkish Surprise 80 75 US 2 Yr Change From 1st Hike (bps) 70 400 65 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research, Federal Reserve Bank. We use the Federal Reserve’s Major Currency Nominal Trade Weighted Index 300 200 100 Exhibit 4 USD Rises into First Hike, Sells off After USD TWI (Rebased, 1st Hike=100) 104 0 -100 -200 102 -30 -20 94 Cycle 100 -10 0 98 Cycle 10 20 04 Cycle 30 40 50 Weeks from 1st Hike 98 Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research 96 USD’s depreciation during the 1994-1995 tightening cycle is surprising given the sharp increase in yields. One explanation is the US starting out with low yields compared to the rest of G10 at the beginning of the tightening cycle. As such, funding in USD remained attractive even as the Fed began removing accommodation. Also, destabilizing fixed income volatility may have made US asset markets less attractive, keeping USD risk-seeking inflows limited. Nevertheless, the 1994 experience is noteworthy for today, especially as some market participants anticipate a hawkish repricing of rate expectations in line with the Fed’s own projections. If 1994 is any guide, such a rise in yields will not necessarily propel the USD even higher, as some expect. 94 92 90 -30 -20 -10 94 Cycle 04 Cycle 0 10 20 98 Cycle Average Cycle 30 40 50 Weeks from 1st Hike Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research The USD’s post-hike decline made logical sense in the 20042006 cycle, given the low starting point for the Fed Funds rate (1%) and very gradual/transparent nature of tightening. Moreover, the tightening cycle arrived in the middle of a structural bearish USD trend that reflected US investors 8 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Exhibit 6 Nominal Interest Rate Differentials Before and After the First Hike US 2Yr Swap - Avg G4 Ex-US 2Yr Swap 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -30 -20 -10 0 10 94 Cycle 98 Cycle 20 04 Cycle 30 40 50 Weeks from 1st Hike Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research, Germany 2yr Swap used for pre-1999 Euro Swap Lessons for Today If history repeats itself, we should expect USD to continue appreciating ahead of the first rate hike. In true “buy the rumor, sell the fact” fashion, investors should then be cautious once the Fed starts tightening in case there is a downward correction in USD. Indeed, the ferocity of the USD’s move to date may increase the likelihood of a post-hike correction. While not our base case, it’s possible that the first Fed hike could even mark the beginning of the end for this USD Super Cycle (The USD Super Cycle, January 22, 2015). Still, there are reasons to think USD can keep going even after the Fed pulls the trigger. Today, all of the Fed’s G4 peers are operating at near-zero interest rates. The ECB, SNB, Riksbank and DNB have even moved interest rates into negative territory. We have argued that this environment is leading to a shift in funding interest away from USD and into other currencies, providing structural support for the greenback. Super-low interest rates and increased use of derivatives are also encouraging FX hedging of non-US securities at an unprecedented scale. This neutralizes the FX impact of risk-seeking inflows into these countries. All told, we think there are enough structural factors backing the USD bull cycle over our forecast horizon (through end2016). Large fixed income inflows from the private and official sector offer ongoing support. Increased funding in and hedging of foreign currencies will cushion USD downside. Valuation-wise, USD is not yet stretched on a real effective basis. We advise our readers to expect further USD strength going into the first rate hike, but exercise somewhat more caution thereafter. 9 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Technical Chart of the Week – EUR/USD Sheena Shah Long term EUR/USD Chart 1.70 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.30 1.20 1.1640 1.10 1.0794 1.00 0.9613 0.90 0.8565 0.80 0.8231 100 00RSI 01 02 03 04 05 06 1.6038 B X B A 1.1877 07 08 07 08 09 10 C A 11 12 1.2043 1.1098 13 14 15 EURUSD has accelerated lower, moving just below the bottom end of the recent trend channel at 1.0630. Currently in a downward C-wave, whose substructure below shows that the wave is incomplete, supporting a bearish view. The next lows to watch out for are 1.0794 (Sept-2003), 0.9613 (Sept2002) and then 0.8565 (Jan2002). 0 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 2-year EUR/USD Chart 1.45 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00 RSI Mar-13 Jun-13 Sep-13 Dec-13 Mar-14 Jun-14 Sep-14 Dec-14 Mar-15 15 Mar-13 Jun-13 Sep-13 Dec-13 Mar-14 Jun-14 Sep-14 Dec-14 Mar-15 1.3993 B 2 1 4 1.1534 1.1115 3 The break below 1.0630 opened the way to further downside for EURUSD. The outlook remains bearish but due to the recent rapid fall there is a risk of a mild rebound. We expect th completion of the 5 wave around parity. 90-day EUR/USD Chart rd 1.30 1.25 1.20 1 1.15 1 4 1.1534 2 1.1380 1 1.1098 1 1.10 1 1.0495 1.05 3 1 1.00 1 1RSI 55 109 163 217 271 325 379 433 487 541 595 649 703 757 811 865 919 973 1027 100 1 1 Completing a 3 sub-wave with a low of 1.0495, there is room for EURUSD to technically rebound towards the 1.0850/1.0900 area, which is between 38.2% and 50% retracement levels. We would use this rebound as a selling opportunity, targeting parity. We place stops around 1.1100, since a move above here could open the way to crossing the 2-wave top at 1.1380. 0 1 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 10 Nov 14 27 Nov 14 15 Dec 14 31 Dec 14 18 Jan 15 04 Feb 15 20 Feb 15 10 Mar 15 x 10000 For a description of the Elliott Wave Theory see: Trading Technicals – The Elliott Wave Method, January 10, 2014. Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research 10 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Strategic FX Portfolio Trade Recommendations Evan Brown, Vandit D. Shah Enter: NY Close Mar 12, 2015; Target: 10.60; Stop: 9.00 Our economists expect wages to rise in Japan with the cyclical recovery well underway in their view (see Japan Economics: JLimit Order: Buy JPY/KRW 05-Mar-15 Korea Fighting Disinflationary Forces Insight: Faster: Cyclical and Structural Reasons for the Acceleration of Wages (12 Mar 2015)). Real exports have begun to pick up as well with the historically-weak JPY REER boosting competitiveness. On the other hand, the BoK cut rates this week as Korea spirals further into deflation. Weakness in the EUR has also resulted in further unwanted KRW REER appreciation dampening the macro outlook. As such, we recommend a long JPY/KRW trade, with a key risk to this trade being a spike in US yields which could drag USD/JPY with it. Enter: 9.1992; Target: 8.880; Stop: 9.2000 Strong German Economy Lifts Sweden 13 From the perspective of Germany, the ECB’s monetary policy stance is ultra-loose given the strength of its economy. We believe SEK will disproportionately benefit from Germany’s booming economy and stimulus, given large export linkages. This is already beginning to show in Sweden’s data, with GDP, CPI and IP all surprising to the upside. However, we would highlight the risk of Swedish policymakers turning hawkish on currency strength and possibly intervening. 12 05-Mar-15 Enter: 4.10; Target: 4.28; Stop: 4.02 Growth Stronger in Chile than Colombia Hold: Long CLP/COP Both CLP and COP have seen a significant amount of currency depreciation over the past six months, but this has resulted in very different outcomes. In Chile, depreciation has generated a boost in exports and domestic demand, while in Colombia, despite the large depreciation, non-oil exports are soft and the manufacturing sector continues to waver. We see relative value in being long CLP/COP . For more, see EM FX Trades: Buy CLP/COP (09 Mar 2015). 05-Mar-15 Hold: Long USD/ILS 12-Feb-15 Hold: Short EUR/INR Enter: 3.99; Target: 4.25; Stop: 3.90 10 9 8 7 6 20% 100% CLP-COP Manufacturing Growth (YoY) CLP-COP Export Growth (YoY, RHS) 15% 80% 60% 10% 40% 5% 20% 0% 0% -20% -5% -40% -10% -60% 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 -100% 2002 -80% -20% 2001 -15% 2000 Hold: Short EUR/SEK German Unemployment Rate 11 BoI Steps Up Interventions Recent data show that the BoI has started to intervene more aggressively to manage the ILS TWI weaker. Should the BoI be successful in steering market expectations for more ILS weakness, then it is likely that the correlation between EUR/USD and USD/ILS will reassert itself. This correlation is based on the premise that the BoI targets the ILS TWI in which the EUR holds the highest single weighting. As such further declines in EUR/USD will require more significant policy-driven moves higher in USD/ILS for the ILS TWI to not appreciate. Enter: 71.05; Target: 64.00; Stop: 68.50 Macro Outlook Improving in India Improved governance and a renewed push for structural reform, lower oil prices and a narrowing current account deficit, and credible monetary policy make us relatively constructive on INR. India is one of the few places in the world offering an attractive carry-to-vol ratio. Postthe budget and another surprise RBI rate cut, we maintain our stance on long INR positions as being a good way to pick up carry, with chatter on raising FDI limits in the insurance sector further supportive. In contrast, we stay negative on EUR on yield compression, reserve diversification and political uncertainty. Increased bank lending and FX hedging could only lead to further EUR weakness. 11 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse 23-Feb-15 Hold: Long USD/TRY 12-Feb-15 Hold: Long USD/PEN Enter: 2.4600; Target: 2.7500; Stop: 2.5500 Enter: 3.0690; Target: 3.2600; Stop: 3.0690 Peru REER Elevated; Trade Balance Down Copper and gold account for the bulk of Peru’s export revenues and China is the main trading partner. In line with this, PEN is vulnerable to lower metal prices and weaker demand from China with Chinese policymakers lowering their growth target to 7.0%y recently. PEN is also vulnerable to higher US interest rates because of high foreign ownership of local government bonds. Peru’s REER has room to adjust lower compared to Chile and other currencies in LatAm. For more, see Video | LatAm FX: Not There Yet (12 Mar 2015). 20-Feb-15 Enter: 0.9400; Hit Target: 1.0000 Closed: Long USD/CHF While we hit target on our long USD/CHF trade, we will look to reenter at better levels. Switzerland’s policymakers face an urgent struggle against the rise in their real effective exchange rate. Not only do they risk a sharp fall in competitiveness and exports, but as well a rise in deflationary risks. As such, we expect Swiss policymakers to try to further counter CHF REER appreciation – which itself is overvalued trading at 2.5 standard deviations above its historical average. We like selling CHF against USD as we expect the structural bullish USD trend to continue – hence, we will look to buy dips. 29-Jan-15 Enter: 32.78; Target: 35.00; Stop: 32.00 Hold: Long USD/THB The battle against lowflation fought by global central banks is in full swing with the BoT’s rate cut this week adding to easing measures undertaken by the MAS, RBI, BI, BCRP, BoC and RBA in recent weeks, in addition to the ECB’s monetary salvo. With our ASEAN economics team expecting one more rate cut from BoT, we think current levels provide good risk-reward to be long USD/THB. The high THB REER is undermining competitiveness and stoking disinflationary pressures increasing the need for monetary action. For more, see EM FX Trades: Long USD/THB (29 Jan 2015). 8-Jan-15 Enter: 46.74; Hit Target: 45.00 Hit Target: Short SGD/INR Past CBT Easing Cycles We tighten the stop on our long USD/TRY trade heading into the FOMC meeting next week. Indeed, we have broadly pared back risk against high-yielders tactically in the current environment. In the medium-term, however, risks surrounding US yields and CBT monetary policy keep us bullish on the pair. On domestic monetary policy, we think further easing will fuel concerns on declining real yields leaving TRY vulnerable to the external environment; however, even if the CBT takes a more prudent course, TRY gains will be limited given ongoing commentary from some public officials on the need for faster rate cuts. Switzerland Risks Falling into Deflation THB REER Has Appreciated Sharply Change in C/A Balance Favors India While we hit our target on our short SGD/INR trade, we will look to reenter at better levels as we continue to believe in the fundamental story. SGD moved lower in line with our expectations that Singaporean policymakers would need to act to counter deflationary risks and unwanted REER appreciation. Indeed, we expect the MAS to further reduce the slope of appreciation in the April meeting. We couple our long-standing bearishness on SGD to our structurally bullish view on INR as a relative value trade within AxJ. Improved governance and a renewed push for structural reform, lower oil prices and a narrowing current account deficit, and credible monetary policy make us relatively constructive on INR. 12 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse 12-Feb-15 Closed: Short AUD/USD 5-Feb-15 Hold: EUR/USD put spread Enter: 0.7735; Close at NY Close Mar 12, 2015 AUD REER Still Overvalued While we maintain our structurally bearish view on AUD, we close this trade for now given the absence of a near-term catalyst. Indeed, we pare back our USD longs for now against high-beta FX heading into the FOMC meeting waiting for better levels to sell rallies in the pair. In the medium-term, the negative pass-through to national income, investment and labour markets from the decline in Australia’s terms-oftrade appears substantial, with the RBA downgrading 2015 growth and inflation forecasts. We still expect 2 more 25bp cuts this year (May and August) with our economists’ forecast for growth below consensus at 1.9%y. What’s more, economic data from China continue to print weak and our iron-ore analysts remain bearish, with AUD also vulnerable to higher US front-end yields. Buying a 3m 1.1250/1.0850 put spread Greece: Key Maturities in July &August Our EURUSD put spread is well in the money and we will hold to maturity. Source for all charts: Bloomberg, Haver Analytics, Macrobond, Reuters EcoWin, Morgan Stanley Research 13 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Strategic FX Portfolio Trade Recommendation Notional Nominal Weight Entry Date Entry Level Current Stop Target Spot P&L Carry P&L Portfolio Contribution Closed Trades Short SGD/INR $10.0mn 9.6% 08-Jan-15 46.74 Closed at 45.00 on Mar 9, 2015 $374.2k $133.8k $508.0k Long USD/CHF $10.0mn 9.6% 20-Feb-15 0.9400 Closed at 1.00 on Mar 10, 2015 $600.0k $3.2k $603.2k Short AUD/USD $10.0mn 9.6% 12-Feb-15 0.7735 Close at NY Close Mar 12, 2015 $56.9k -$17.2k $39.7k Long USD/THB $10.0mn 9.6% 29-Jan-15 32.78 32.85 32.00 35.00 $21.6k -$35.7k -$14.1k Long USD/PEN $10.0mn 9.6% 12-Feb-15 3.0690 3.0930 3.0690 3.2600 $92.0k -$49.8k $42.2k Short EUR/INR $10.0mn 9.6% 12-Feb-15 71.05 66.48 68.50 64.00 $676.4k $63.0k $739.4k Long USD/TRY $10.0mn 9.6% 23-Feb-15 2.4600 2.6004 2.5500 2.7500 $515.1k -$50.5k $464.6k Short EUR/SEK $10.0mn 9.6% 05-Mar-15 9.1992 9.1364 9.2000 8.8800 $64.0k $0.0k $63.9k Long USD/ILS $10.0mn 9.6% 05-Mar-15 3.99 4.00 3.90 4.25 $30.5k $0.2k $30.6k Long CLP/COP $10.0mn 9.6% 05-Mar-15 4.10 4.13 4.02 4.28 $57.2k -$2.2k $54.9k 9.29 9.00 10.60 Active Trades Lim it Trades Buy JPY/KRW $10.0mn Enter at NY Close Mar 12, 2015 Cash $22.6mn 21.6% Portfolio Mark to Market $104.4mn Source: Morgan Stanley Research Notes: (1) Stops are based on the WMR fixing. (2) The portfolio represents hypothetical, not actual, investments. For more details regarding calculations, please see “Reading FX Tactical Trade Performance” at the back of FX Pulse. Our FX Trade Data Performance Package (12 Feb 2015) contains complete performance statistics. (3) Reported returns are unleveraged. Reported returns do not take into account transaction fees and other costs; past performance is no guarantee of future results. (4) In the case that trade allocations are increased, entry levels are a weighted average. * Global Risk Demand Index – US Pat. No. 7,617,143. We updated our methodology for our portfolio in 2011 (FX Pulse: Watching Europe, October 13, 2011). Simulated Managed Account Monthly Gross Performance - % Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year return 2007 -0.75 -0.77 -1.08 0.94 0.36 -2.02 1.07 2.75 1.26 0.45 1.16 0.18 3.52% 2008 1.07 2.25 2.72 -1.41 -0.53 1.28 -0.17 -0.24 -0.86 3.12 0.62 0.87 8.96% 2009 0.74 -0.97 -0.15 -1.09 0.50 -0.87 0.30 0.22 2.00 0.77 1.27 0.55 3.27% 2010 -0.01 -0.27 1.71 1.13 1.39 -0.86 -2.36 0.95 0.67 -0.30 0.13 0.66 2.80% 2011 -1.20 0.29 -1.71 0.51 -1.11 -0.33 0.84 -1.02 0.50 -1.03 -0.18 0.44 -3.97% 2012 0.34 0.46 -0.42 0.52 1.78 -0.43 0.39 0.56 0.43 0.53 0.96 0.47 5.72% 2013 -0.23 -0.66 0.08 0.10 0.26 0.05 -0.71 -0.13 -0.62 0.23 1.17 -0.27 -0.75% 2014 1.09 -0.67 -0.54 -0.02 -0.20 -0.26 1.20 0.30 1.23 0.35 -0.30 0.37 2.54% 2015 2.21 0.09 1.74 4.04% Source: Morgan Stanley Research; see notes above Options Trades Trade Recommendation Notional Entry Date Expiry Date Strike Entry Spot Entry Vol Entry Cost Current Spot Closed Option Trades Long EUR put/USD call Short EUR put/USD call Current Vol Current Cost Total 2015 P&L $10.0mn $10.0mn 5-Feb-15 5-Feb-15 7-May-15 7-May-15 1.1250 1.0850 1.1470 1.1470 12.23% 12.98% 1.56% 0.70% 1.0626 1.0626 10.90% 11.75% 6.33% 3.23% P&L $224.0k $476.5k -$252.5k 14 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Click here for interactive currency pages: G10 Currency Summary Dara Blume and Sheena Shah USD Dollar Data Dependence 10.5% We expect USD will continue to trend stronger but recognize that outside of payrolls, data has disappointed somewhat recently. Retail sales were softer than expected. Our Q1 GDP forecast has been consistently revised lower over the past six weeks, and now stands at 1.2%. Given the large move in USD year to date, this creates scope for some retracement, but given the longer-term growth outlook, doesn’t change our medium-term view. EUR Remain Bearish -13.0% Bullish Bearish Watch: PPI, Industrial Production, TIC, Housing Starts, FOMC Watch: ZEW, CPI (F), Trade Balance, Current Account The start of the ECB’s QE has sent both core and peripheral bond yields tumbling, taking EURUSD with them. We maintain our bearish outlook, and we would use rebounds as selling opportunities. The unsettled Greek situation means the EUR is starting to attract a risk discount, bringing our 0.90 EURUSD bear case target for year-end into focus. We believe that the leverage community and non-EMU corporates have relatively light EUR positions, opening the way for further downside. JPY A Brighter Picture 1.8% JPY has been the best performing currency on the crosses over the last week, and we expect this could continue. The Japanese economy is starting to show signs of reflation, suggesting BoJ action could be limited. The latest GDP print was weak, but largely due to inventories, so we would not read too much into this print. GPIF reallocation has largely happened, so outflows going forward could be lower. We like buying JPY on crosses. Neutral Watch: Industrial Production, Trade, GBP GBP – Support on Crosses - 4.3% EURGBP has been reaching new lows, and we expect this trend to continue, with GBP receiving support on the crosses. However, we remain bearish against the USD. The data has started to turn around, with manufacturing production being weak and the retail sector feeling the pinch. Political risks will remain until and after the May election, which will likely keep GBPUSD under selling pressure. We target 1.47 initially in short positions and will be watching the BoE’s release of their minutes. CHF USDCHF Steams Ahead 2.3% We expect CHF to continue its underperformance. The crossing of 1.00 in USDCHF was important in keeping the uptrend in the currency pair. Inflation data was weak, as expected, so the SNB meeting will be important. We will be watching whether the SNB provides any guidance on their preferred EURCHF level. The CHF will be weak, if the bank revises their inflation forecasts lower. Should EUR continue to weaken, we expect the CHF to follow. CAD A Shift in Tone Neutral Watch: Employment, Manufacturing Sales, CPI, Retail Sales We remain bearish on CAD over the medium term as we believe there is room for further weakness to improve competitiveness. That said, with the central bank taking near-term cuts off the table, and some signs of USD retracement, we would wait for dips to enter long USDCAD positions at better levels. This week, economic data in Canada will be watched closely given the latest BoC shift. Watching RBA Minutes Bearish Watch: RBA Minutes, Leading Index 9.0% AUD Neutral Bearish Watch: Employment report, BoE Minutes, PSNB Watch: PPI, Retail Sales, Trade Balance, SNB - 6.4% We expect AUD to weaken over the medium term and stick to our bearish view, but recognize that if USD strength experiences some relief, there could be scope for a correction in high beta currencies such as AUD. That said, the RBA minutes could strike a more dovish tone, and markets will be watching closely to see if the 50bp priced in over the next year are appropriate. NZD Sell on Rallies - 5.3% The RBNZ left rates unchanged but lowered its path for 90-day interest rates, suggesting that the central bank could shift toward a more dovish bias. The central bank also pushed back on price action in the NZD on a TWI basis, suggesting that policymakers are watching the exchange rate closely. We think NZDUSD is a sell on rallies, though acknowledge that with US data soft, the recent rally could have further legs, so patience is key. SEK Gaining Against EUR 12.2% EURSEK could have further to go in the near term, as improved growth and inflation dynamics in Sweden make further central bank easing unlikely, while the ECB beginning its QE program is likely to pressure EUR. Inflation may have started to bottom out in Sweden, supporting the SEK. We believe the central bank would object to excessive currency strength, but see scope for EURSEK to head toward the 9.00-9.10 range. Watching the Norges Bank Bearish Watch: Norges Bank, Unemployment rate (AKU), Retail Sales NOK 7.6% Neutral Neutral Watch: Current Account, GDP, Consumer Confidence Watch: Economic Tendency Survey, Trade Balance, Retail Sales Weakness in oil markets has caused the NOK to remain one of the weakest currencies in the G10, even with the rapid EUR decline. The central bank is expected to cut rates this week, which is likely to keep the NOK weak against the USD, but EURNOK is still a tricky trade. There has been a 7% decline in EURNOK since Dec, so any mention by the Norges Bank of needing a weaker currency to rebalance the economy is likely to weaken the NOK on the day. Charts show 3M performance against USD, as normally quoted and DXY for USD. Click on any currency for a reference webpage on Matrix. Charts show 1M performance against USD, as normally quoted 15 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse EM Currency Summary Jessica Liang (AXJ), Meena Bassily (CEEMEA), Felipe Hernandez and Dara Blume (LatAm) CNY Neutral INR Neutral IDR Bearish 0.3% Despite the domestic growth slowdown, we expect the PBoC to manage excess volatility in RMB. Looking ahead, we anticipate a stable path for CNY. 0.5% In the near term, we expect INR to be range-bound. Lower oil prices will benefit India both from a current account perspective and by allowing RBI to lower rates earlier. Longer-term prospects for INR will hinge more on the success of reform efforts, in our view. Being long INR on the crosses can be attractive from a carry perspective. A dovish BI has triggered further IDR weakness. We remain structurally bearish on IDR. We think that REER adjustments and sustainability of bond inflows will be the key to the outlook for IDR in 2015. For Indonesia to regain competitiveness, REER adjustment will be needed. Declining inflation, weak exports and sluggish domestic growth had BoK cutting rates to an all-time low of 1.75%. Rising volatility and expectation of Fed tightening will likely cap foreign bond inflows, while slowing growth will keep equity inflows muted. We see USD/KRW climbing higher for the rest of the year. We see MYR as susceptible to continued low commodity prices and see the potential for portfolio investment outflows in the event of carry trade unwinds. However, given the risk of bond issuance repatriation flows in the near term, we remain neutral on MYR for now. 4.0% 3.4% KRW Bearish 3.0% MYR Neutral - 0.2% PHP Neutral THB Bearish CZK Neutral HUF Bearish ILS Bearish PLN Bearish RUB Neutral TRY Bearish ZAR Bearish BRL Neutral CLP Neutral COP Bearish 0.6% 5.4% 4.9% 3.5% 5.1% - 6.5% 3.9% 5.0% 10.3% 1.1% 9.6% 2.9% MXN Bullish 0.4% PEN Bearish The Philippines’ strong fundamentals support the peso even as the central bank turns more neutral. We see USD/PHP trading with the stronger USD trend but think it is likely to be a relative outperformer in the region. BoT cut rates by 25bp triggering THB weakness after months of resilience. Given the sharp decline in inflation, we see room for one more rate cut this year. Aggressive monetary easing by BoJ and ECB has caused THB REER to appreciate to all-time highs, jeopardizing Thailand’s export competitiveness. We remain long USD/THB. EUR/CZK continues to head lower with the EUR weakening across the board and the chances of the CNB raising the EUR/CZK floor from 27 having come down with recent comments from the President that were opposed to the previous devaluation of the CZK. Still, we think the floor at 27 will stay in place for a prolonged period of time. Despite some recent improvements in performance, we believe it is still too soon to become constructive on HUF on the back of signs of improved growth data. The main risk is related to an increase in bond market volatility driven by Fed risks which can cause large spikes higher in EUR/HUF. We also expect further NBH easing. The BoI has backed recent rhetoric about wanting a weaker exchange rate with both rate cuts and discretionary interventions, which were as high as USD 800m over February. As such, we stay long USD/ILS, though expect it may take some time to see a meaningful break above 4, which has proved to be a strong resistance. The NBP delivered a 50bp rate cut; however, they also explicitly signalled an end to the easing cycle. In addition the NBP did not show much concern about potential PLN strengthening. As such, EUR/PLN may continue to grind lower with no expectation of dovish policy and the bar for concern about FX strength being somewhat high. The recent increase in oil prices in addition to the Minsk agreement have allowed for a recovery in RUB. However, with the cease-fire remaining fragile and risks of more dovish CBR actions, we do not think RUB valuations are attractive, and keep to a neutral stance on the currency. There has been an improvement in the risks surrounding monetary policy. The CBT and government officials met and there has been a clear reduction in political commentary about monetary policy. Still, TRY faces risks from Fed policy. As such, we stay long USD/TRY but have raised the stop to 2.55 to protect gains. The ZAR has acted as a clear proxy to risks surrounding Fed policy and rising UST yields. Trade and manufacturing data have remained poor in South Africa, keeping the current account deficit wide; therefore external funding costs remain important, particularly since FDI flows have been weak in the most recent data. We remain bearish on BRL, even after the depreciation already seen. The central bank’s decision not to roll all of its swaps suggests it is more comfortable allowing the currency to depreciate. The REER remains overvalued, and for competitiveness to improve, a weaker currency would help. We believe CLP could outperform its peers in the near term, as there are signs that FX weakness is feeding through into real economic growth. With inflation picking up, the market is now expecting a more hawkish central bank. We expect COP to weaken further, as Colombia needs to improve the competitiveness of its non-oil sector. While there has been some speculation that policymakers could step in to support the currency as they did in Mexico, officials have stated that they are happy with FX weakness. We are cautious about Banxico’s new intervention mechanism and believe it is unlikely to prevent USDMXN from heading higher in times of broad USD strength. Its relatively small scale will limit its effectiveness, as has been the case in other Latin American countries recently. That said, we believe MXN could be a relative outperformer over time. On a REER basis, PEN looks rich relative to historical levels and lower terms of trade. Decelerating economic activity, particularly in non-commodity tradable sectors, and eroding trade and current account results are also consistent with other evidence that the currency needs to depreciate to help push a necessary macro rebalancing. Charts show 1M performance against USD, as normally quoted 16 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Global Event Risk Calendar Charles Rubenfeld Date Day 13-Mar Fri 15-Mar Sun 16-Mar Mon 17-Mar 18-Mar 19-Mar Time (Ldn) Ccy Event Ref. Period 12:30 12:30 04:30 10:30 14:00 CAD CAD JPY RUB USD Unemployment Rate Employment Change Industrial Production (MoM) CBR Rates Decision Univ. of Michigan Confidence 21:30 NZD Performance Services Index 22:30 12:30 13:00 08:00 18:45 09:00 13:00 12:30 13:15 13:15 14:00 20:00 AUD CAD CAD CHF EUR NOK PLN USD USD USD USD USD Consumer Confidence Int'l Securities Transactions Existing Home Sales (MoM) SNB Sight Deposits ECB's Draghi spks (Frankfurt) Trade Balance CPI Core (YoY) Empire Manufacturing Industrial Production (MoM) Capacity Utilization NAHB Housing Market Index Total Net TIC Flows 00:30 23:30 12:30 10:00 10:00 10:00 10:45 12:40 N/A N/A 03:00 05:00 23:50 N/A N/A 12:00 12:30 AUD AUD CAD EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR IDR ILS JPY JPY JPY JPY NZD TRY USD RBA Minutes Westpac Leading Index (MoM) Manufacturing Sales (MoM) German ZEW Survey Expectations Eurozone ZEW Survey Expectations CPI (YoY) ECB's Praet spks (Frankfurt) ECB's Nouy spks (Frankfurt) BI Rates Decision Israel Elections BoJ Press Conference Leading Index CI Trade Balance BoJ Rates Decision Global Dairy Trade Announces Milk Auction Results CBT Rates Decision Housing Starts 10:00 01:30 10:00 09:30 09:30 09:30 21:45 08:30 18:00 CHF CNY EUR GBP GBP GBP NZD SEK USD ZEW Survey Expectations China February Property Prices Construction Output (MoM) Average Weekly Earnings (3M/Y) (excl. bonuses) ILO Unemployment Rate 3Mths BoE Minutes GDP (QoQ) Riksbank's Ingves spks FOMC Rate Decision Mar -73 Jan Jan Jan -0.8% 2.1% 5.7% 4Q 1% 07:00 08:30 09:00 21:00 04:30 23:50 09:00 09:30 12:30 12:30 14:00 14:00 CHF CHF CHF CLP JPY JPY NOK NOK USD USD USD USD Trade Balance SNB Rates Decision SNB's Jordan spks (Zurich) CBCH Rates Decision All Industry Activity Index (MoM) BoJ Minutes Norges Bank Rates Decision Norges Bank Press Conference Current Account Balance Initial Jobless Claims Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook Leading Index Feb MS forecast Feb Feb Jan F Market 6.7% -5k 14% Mar P 14% 95.5 Previous 6.6% 35.4k 4% 15% 95.4 Feb 57.8 Jan Feb 110.3 -13.5B -3.1% Feb Feb Mar Feb Feb Mar Jan 0.3% 79.5% 0.5% 8 0.3% 79.5% 57 27.1B 0.5% 7.78 0.15% 79.4% 55 -174.8B Tue Feb Jan Mar Mar Feb F 0.1% 1.68% 53 52.7 -0.3% 7.5% 7.5% 0.1% 0.1% 105.1 -1179.1B 0.1% 7.50% 1025k 7.5% 1045k 7.5% 1065k Jan F Feb Feb Wed 0.25% 0.25% 0.25% Thu 3.43B -0.75% -0.75% Jan 3% 0.2% 3% 0.75% 4Q -101.5bn Mar Feb 0.1% 3% -0.3% 1.25% -102 305k 8 0.2% -100.26 320k 5.2 0.2% 17 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse 20-Mar Fri 22-Mar Sun 23-Mar Mon 24-Mar 25-Mar 26-Mar 27-Mar 07-Apr 09-Apr 15-Apr 15-Apr 29-Apr 29-Apr 02:10 12:30 12:30 09:00 09:30 03:30 00:00 02:00 AUD CAD CAD EUR GBP NOK NZD NZD RBA's Stevens spks (Melbourne) CPI (YoY) Retail Sales (MoM) Euro-area Current Account PSNB ex Interventions Norges Bank's Olsen spks ANZ Consumer Confidence Index Credit Card Spending (MoM) 19:00 EUR First Round of French Departmental Elections 22:30 23:00 08:00 08:00 15:00 14:00 14:00 AUD AUD CHF CHF EUR ILS USD Consumer Confidence Conference Board Leading Index M3 (YoY) SNB Sight Deposits Consumer Confidence BoI's Rates Decision Existing Home Sales 01:45 09:00 09:00 09:30 09:30 13:00 21:45 12:30 12:30 14:00 14:00 CNY EUR EUR GBP GBP HUF NZD USD USD USD USD PMI Manufacturing PMI Manufacturing PMI Services CPI (YoY) ONS House Price (YoY) NBH Rates Decision Trade Balance CPI (YoY) CPI Ex Food and Energy (YoY) New Home Sales Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index 00:30 07:00 01:45 09:00 08:00 12:30 AUD CHF CNY EUR SEK USD RBA's Financial Stability Review Consumption Indicator Consumer Sentiment IFO Expectations Economic Tendency Survey Durable Goods Orders 13:30 12:00 09:00 09:30 23:30 23:50 19:00 08:00 08:30 08:30 N/A 12:30 15:00 N/A CAD CZK EUR GBP JPY JPY MXN PHP SEK SEK TWD USD USD ZAR BoC's Poloz spks (London) CNB Rates Decision M3 (YoY) Retail Sales (MoM) CPI (YoY) Retail Trade (YoY) Banxico Rates Decision BSP Rates Decision Trade Balance PPI (YoY) CBC Rates Decision Initial Jobless Claims Kansas City Fed Manufacturing Activity SARB Rates Decision NOK NOK NOK SEK USD USD Retail Sales (MoM) Unemployment Rate Norges Bank's Olsen spks Retail Sales (MoM) GDP (QoQ) Univ. of Michigan Confidence AUD GBP EUR CAD SEK NZD RBA Rates Decision BoE Rates Decision ECB Rates Decision BoC Rates Decision Riksbank Rates Decision RBNZ Rates Decision Feb Jan Jan Feb 1% -2% 17.796B -8.75B Mar Feb 124 1.9% Jan Feb 110.3 0.4 3.16% Mar A 0.1% -6.7% 0.1% 4.82m 1.9% Feb Feb Feb Feb Mar 50.7 51 53.7 0.3% 9.8% 2.1% 56m -0.1% 1.6% 481k 0 Feb Mar Mar Mar Feb 1.24 112 102.5 104.8 2.8% 0.1% Feb Tue Mar P Mar P Mar P Feb Jan 2% Wed Thu 0.05% 0.05% Feb Feb Feb Feb 3% 2.5% Feb Feb 1.875% 305k Mar 5.75% 0.05% 4.1% -0.7% 2.4% -2% 3% 2.5% 3.5 0.18% 1.875% 320k 1 5.75% Fri 09:00 09:00 N/A 08:30 12:30 14:00 Upcoming Risk Events 05:30 12:00 12:45 15:00 08:30 22:00 Feb Mar -0.7% 3% Feb 4Q T Mar F 1.16% 2.2% 95.4 Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr Apr 95.5 2.25% 0.50% 0.05% 0.75% 2.25% 0.50% 0.05% 3.50% 3.50% 2.25% 0.50% 0.05% 0.75% -0.10% 3.50% N/A Denotes timing approximate or not confirmed / All times and dates are GMT and correct as of the date of publication / For a full list of economic events see the calendar on the Morgan Stanley Matrix Platform / Source: Morgan Stanley Research, Bloomberg 18 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Cross-Currency Carry and Vol Heat Map Vandit D. Shah Note: Access is available to the carry metrics on an interactive basis on the Morgan Stanley Matrix Platform. Contact your Morgan Stanley sales representative if you do not have access. For a user’s guide to this heatmap, see FX Pulse, April 24, 2014, page 22. 19 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Click here for interactive charts G10 FX Tactical Indicators Charles Rubenfeld Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Historical Currency Performance FXVIX (FX Volatility Index) 6% 13.0 4% 12.0 2% 11.0 0% 10.0 -2% -4% 9.0 -6% 8.0 -8% DXY NZD AUD CAD SEK JPY GBP NOK EUR CHF Monthly 7.0 6.0 Weekly 5.0 Mar-13 Jun-13 Sep-13 Dec-13 Mar-14 Jun-14 Sep-14 Dec-14 Mar-15 Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Relative Momentum Indicator MS GRDI – Standardized 10 3 2 5 1 0 0 -1 -2 -5 -3 -10 -4 USD JPY CAD NZD AUD Current GBP SEK CHF EUR NOK -5 Mar-14 Last week May-14 Jul-14 Sep-14 Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research Global Risk Demand Index – US Pat. No. 7,617,143 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 DXY (Dollar Index) IMM Positions Summary ($bn) Nov-14 Jan-15 NZD 99 CHF 96 MXN 93 GBP 90 CAD 87 AUD 84 JPY 81 EUR 78 Jan-14 -26 -24 -22 -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 Mar-14 May-14 Jul-14 Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research Sep-14 Nov-14 Jan-15 -8 -6 -4 -2 Mar-15 Note: Aggregate USD positioning in nominal terms, see appendix for details. Source: Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley Research 20 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Click here for a full positioning history Morgan Stanley FX Positioning Tracker Calvin Tse, Sheena Shah Overall Score Component Scores This Week Last Week Short Neutral -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 Long 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 USD 1 1 EUR -3 -3 JPY 1 1 GBP -4 -3 CHF 0 0 CAD -4 -4 AUD 0 -1 NZD -3 -3 NOK 1 -2 SEK -1 -2 MS Flow IMM Toshin TFX Beta ETF Since Monday, March 9, positioning in currencies has shifted. The largest shorts are in GBP and CAD. There are no significant longs in the G10. GBP short positioning increased intraweek. This was driven by large selling from global macro hedge funds. AUD shorts were reduced and positioning is now neutral. Over the last week Japanese retail were the main buyers. We will provide a full updated report and refresh positioning scores for all of our underlying sub-indicators on Monday. Sentiment -8 6 -10 6 2 10 USD -2 -9 6 -6 4 -10 EUR 9 10 10 -8 -2 -8 JPY -10 -3 -3 1 1 -8 GBP 9 -2 3 -10 CHF -3 -5 -1 -7 CAD 10 -7 2 1 -7 AUD -5 -6 7 -2 -7 -1 NZD 1 0 NOK -4 2 SEK For methodology, see Appendix. Tactical Rich and Cheap Fair Value Model AUD CAD CHF EUR GBP JPY NOK NZD SEK Average Spot Fair Value Z-Score 0.77 0.77 0.27 1.26 1.27 1.75 0.99 0.97 -1.37 1.08 1.25 -3.45 1.50 1.52 -3.66 120.83 119.79 -0.32 7.91 6.79 -6.36 0.74 0.71 1.30 8.46 7.59 -7.73 TRAC Trade Exp. App. Neutral -0.05% Short -0.97% Long 1.38% Long 15.25% Long 0.82% Neutral 0.87% Long 16.48% Short -3.94% Long 11.51% 4.59% BRL CLP COP HUF ILS IDR INR KRW MYR MXN PHP PLN RUB SGD THB TRY ZAR Average Spot Fair Value 3.06 3.19 628 650 2,585 2,514 306 310 4.02 3.69 12,976 13,283 62.17 62.26 1,099 1,072 3.65 3.34 15.50 15.55 44.09 44.08 4.13 4.17 60.22 79.54 1.38 1.36 32.58 32.62 2.62 2.57 12.04 11.40 Z-Score 1.20 1.81 -0.86 0.89 -4.38 1.55 1.00 -0.60 -2.91 1.96 -0.01 0.68 1.06 -1.40 0.66 -2.29 -2.43 TRAC Trade Exp App Short -4.06% Short -3.45% Neutral 2.83% Short -1.37% Long 8.87% Short -2.31% Short -0.14% Neutral 2.52% Long 9.17% Short -0.34% Long 0.01% Neutral -0.88% Short -24.29% Long 1.08% Short -0.14% Long 2.03% Long 5.63% -0.28% The Morgan Stanley Tactical Rich and Cheap (TRAC) model is designed to signal whether a currency is overvalued or undervalued over a 2- to 3-month investment horizon, and aims to provide an indication of short-term fair value rather than a determination of long-term equilibrium fair value. The model is based on an econometric approach using both macroeconomic and market variables, using an algorithm that identifies the ‘best’ model on the basis of modern statistical considerations and economic theory. In particular, the algorithm (called L2 Boosting in academic literature) identifies the most important drivers for each currency, while remaining flexible enough to quickly adapt to new environments and identify ‘false’ market signals. For statistics on how the TRAC model has performed since introduction in November 2013, see FX Fair Value – Revisiting TRAC 3.0, April 24, 2014. Model updated as of March 9, 2015. 21 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Central Bank Watch Next rate Market MS decision expects (bp) expects (bp) US 18 Mar 1 0 Euro Area 15 Apr -2 Japan 17 Mar 0 UK 09 Apr 0 Current Morgan Stanley Forecasts 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 0.125 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.1 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 0.75 0 Canada 15 Apr -6 0 0.75 0.75 Switzerland 19 Mar -6 0 -0.75 -0.75 -0.75 -0.75 -0.75 Sweden 29 Apr -3 0 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 -0.10 Norway 19 Mar -15 -50 1.25 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Australia 07 Apr -11 0 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 New Zealand 29 Apr - 0 3.5 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Russia 13 Mar - -100 15 14.00 13.00 12.00 11.00 Poland 15 Apr -12 0 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Czech Rep 26 Mar -1 0 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Hungary 21 Mar -5 -10 2.1 2.00 1.70 1.50 1.50 Romania 31 Mar - -25 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 Turkey 17 Mar - 0 7.50 7.5 7.25 7.25 7.25 Israel 23 Mar 0 0 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 South Africa 26 Mar 13 0 5.75 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.00 Nigeria 24 Mar - 0 13 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 Ghana 01 Apr - 0 21 21 21 21 20 China - - - 5.35 5.35 5.10 5.10 5.10 India 07 Apr - -25 7.50 7.50 7.00 6.75 6.50 Hong Kong 19 Mar - 0 0.5 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 S. Korea 09 Apr 3 0 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 Taiwan 26 Mar - 0 1.875 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 Indonesia 17 Mar - 0 7.50 7.50 7.25 7.00 6.75 Malaysia 07 May - - 3.25 3.25 3 2.75 2.75 Thailand 11 Mar -10 -25 2 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 Brazil 29 Apr 65 - 12.75 - - - - Mexico 26 Mar 4 0 3 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 Chile 19 Mar -4 0 3 3 2.75 2.75 2.75 Peru 12 Mar - 0 3.25 3.25 3.00 3.00 3.25 Colombia 20 Mar 0 0 4.5 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Source: National Central Banks, Morgan Stanley Research forecasts as of March 12th; Note: Japan policy rate takes a mid-range value. Market expects for G10 as of Mar 05. EM | What’s In the Price. Green (Red) means MS expects a lower (higher) rate than the market at the next meeting. BRICs Policy Rates G4 Policy Rates US 7 Japan UK Euro Area China 30 Brazil 6 25 Russia 5 4 3 15 2 10 1 0 2002 India 20 5 2004 2006 2008 Source: Morgan Stanley Research, Haver Analytics 2010 2012 2014 0 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Source: Morgan Stanley Research, Haver Analytics 22 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse FX Bull/Bear Projections EURUSD EUR/USD 1.50 USDJPY USD/JPY 140 MS Forecast MS Forecast 130 1.40 120 1.30 110 1.20 100 1.10 90 1.00 0.90 Jun-12 80 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 70 Jun-12 Jun-15 USD/CAD 1.38 1.33 1.28 1.23 1.18 1.13 1.08 1.03 0.98 0.93 Jun-12 Jun-13 EURCHF EUR/CHF 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 Jun-12 MS F orecast Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-14 Jun-15 MS F orecast MS F orecast Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 MS F orecast 35 34 1.35 1100 33 1.30 1050 Jun-15 29 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 4.25 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 USDZAR EUR/CZK 30 MS F orecast USD/ZAR 14.5 29 13.5 12.5 28 4.15 11.5 27 4.05 10.5 26 3.95 9.5 25 3.85 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 24 Jun-12 8.5 Jun-13 USDBRL USD/BRL 3.70 3.50 3.30 3.10 2.90 2.70 2.50 2.30 2.10 1.90 1.70 Jun-12 28 Jun-12 MS F orecast 4.35 3.75 Jun-12 Jun-15 MS F orecast EURCZK MS F orecast Jun-14 30 EURPLN EUR/PLN 4.45 Jun-13 31 950 Jun-14 MS F orecast 32 1000 900 Jun-12 Jun-15 USDTHB USD/THB 36 1150 1.25 Jun-14 AUDUSD AUD/USD 1.09 1.04 0.99 0.94 0.89 0.84 0.79 0.74 0.69 0.64 Jun-12 1200 Jun-13 Jun-13 USDKRW USD/KRW 1250 1.40 1.20 Jun-12 MS F orecast USDCAD USDSGD USD/SGD 1.45 GBPUSD GBP/USD 1.75 1.70 1.65 1.60 1.55 1.50 1.45 1.40 1.35 1.30 Jun-12 Jun-14 Jun-15 7.5 Jun-12 Jun-13 USDMXN MS F orecast Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 USD/MXN 16.50 16.00 15.50 15.00 14.50 14.00 13.50 13.00 12.50 12.00 11.50 Jun-12 Jun-14 Jun-15 USDCLP USD/CLP 710 MS F orecast MS F orecast 660 610 560 510 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 460 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jun-15 Source for all charts: Morgan Stanley Research, Bloomberg; shaded area is the range of market forecasts. 23 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Click here for custom cross forecasts Morgan Stanley Global Currency Forecasts We updated most of our G10 and EM forecasts on 22 January, 2015. AUDUSD and NZDUSD were updated on 5 February, 2015. 2015 Current EUR/USD USD/JPY GBP/USD USD/CHF USD/SEK USD/NOK USD/CAD AUD/USD NZD/USD EUR/JPY EUR/GBP EUR/CHF EUR/SEK EUR/NOK USD/CNY USD/HKD USD/IDR USD/INR USD/KRW USD/MYR USD/PHP USD/SGD USD/TWD USD/THB USD/BRL USD/MXN USD/ARS USD/VEF USD/CLP USD/COP USD/PEN USD/ZAR USD/TRY USD/ILS USD/RUB EUR/PLN EUR/CZK EUR/HUF EUR/RON MS Dollar Index MS AXJ Index 1.06 121 1.49 1.00 8.60 8.08 1.27 0.77 0.74 129 0.71 1.06 9.14 8.59 6.26 7.77 13183 62.5 1126 3.69 44.2 1.38 31.6 32.8 3.1 15.36 8.8 6.3 631 2600 3.1 12.2 2.59 4.01 60.9 4.19 27.8 314 4.41 96.95 101.46 4Q15 % change to: 2016 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Consensus Forward 1.12 118 1.48 0.91 8.48 7.77 1.27 0.77 0.71 132 0.75 1.02 9.50 8.70 6.16 7.80 12600 62.5 1190 3.70 45.5 1.34 32.0 33.4 2.65 14.65 10.63 12.0 640 2450 3.05 11.65 2.36 3.98 66.0 4.33 27.8 320 4.46 94.84 101.23 1.08 120 1.44 0.93 8.89 8.24 1.30 0.75 0.68 130 0.75 1.00 9.60 8.90 6.13 7.80 12800 62.5 1210 3.85 46.0 1.36 32.2 33.8 2.75 14.85 11.25 14.0 650 2500 3.10 11.75 2.42 4.05 68.0 4.35 27.8 322 4.48 97.48 100.36 1.06 124 1.39 0.99 9.15 8.68 1.33 0.72 0.66 131 0.76 1.05 9.70 9.20 6.12 7.80 13000 62.3 1230 3.90 46.5 1.38 32.6 34.2 2.85 15.00 11.88 14.0 655 2550 3.15 12.05 2.47 4.10 70.0 4.35 27.9 324 4.50 100.29 99.58 1.05 127 1.38 1.02 9.05 8.86 1.35 0.69 0.65 133 0.76 1.07 9.50 9.30 6.09 7.80 13200 62.5 1230 3.85 47.0 1.40 32.7 34.5 2.90 15.10 12.50 14.0 660 2600 3.20 12.30 2.52 4.15 72.0 4.35 27.9 325 4.50 101.74 99.30 1.03 126 1.40 1.06 9.13 8.83 1.37 0.68 0.63 130 0.74 1.09 9.40 9.10 6.14 7.80 13000 62.7 1250 3.80 47.3 1.41 32.6 34.7 3.00 15.00 12.50 14.0 670 2650 3.25 12.35 2.54 4.17 72.0 4.34 27.9 325 4.45 102.34 98.89 1.02 125 1.39 1.08 9.12 8.73 1.38 0.67 0.61 128 0.73 1.10 9.30 8.90 6.09 7.80 13000 63.0 1240 3.80 47.5 1.41 32.5 35.0 3.05 14.95 12.50 14.0 680 2700 3.30 12.40 2.56 4.19 70.0 4.28 27.6 320 4.45 102.84 99.14 1.01 123 1.38 1.11 9.11 8.71 1.39 0.65 0.60 124 0.73 1.12 9.20 8.80 6.07 7.80 13000 63.0 1230 3.80 47.7 1.40 32.4 34.5 3.10 14.85 12.50 14.0 685 2750 3.35 12.45 2.58 4.22 70.0 4.24 27.4 315 4.40 103.24 99.45 1.00 125 1.37 1.13 9.00 8.70 1.40 0.65 0.60 125 0.73 1.13 9.00 8.70 6.07 7.80 13000 63.0 1230 3.80 48.0 1.40 32.5 34.5 3.15 14.75 12.50 14.0 690 2800 3.40 12.50 2.60 4.25 70.0 4.18 27.0 310 4.40 104.23 99.40 -2.8 1.6 -8.6 5.1 5.6 12.1 6.3 -6.8 -8.5 -0.5 5.7 0.0 3.3 9.4 -1.8 0.5 0.9 -0.8 8.4 4.9 3.5 1.4 1.6 2.4 -1.7 4.1 7.3 -60.0 4.6 4.5 0.0 2.5 -1.9 1.7 6.7 5.3 1.5 5.5 2.0 4.7 -1.9 -1.8 5.4 -7.5 3.2 5.8 9.2 6.2 -9.2 -10.0 3.5 6.2 1.4 3.9 7.3 -4.3 0.4 -6.4 -4.6 8.9 1.9 5.2 1.0 3.6 2.5 -14.4 -3.8 9.1 122.5 1.8 -2.7 -1.5 -4.2 -9.1 4.0 6.7 3.9 2.4 6.0 0.2 5.1 -0.2 Source: Morgan Stanley Research 24 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Appendix The Strategic FX Portfolio Trade Recommendations page presents the portfolio of tactical trade ideas of the FX Strategy team and the performance of this portfolio over time. Strategic FX Portfolio Trade Recommendations (Note: The portfolios represent hypothetical not actual investments.) On 10 June, 2010, we implemented changes to our portfolio to make it more robust and to better reflect our confidence levels and relative risk. A detailed explanation of this change can be found in “Portfolio Methodology Update” (10 June 2010). In summary, the trades and the weightings are primarily reviewed weekly on Thursdays and published in the Pulse. However, if we think there has been a material change to the risk-reward, we will make intraweek changes. We monitor trades daily. We will continue to publish the portfolio as a list of trades where our strongest conviction ideas will be given the largest weightings. We will, however, also adjust the weights of trades in order to manage our risk exposure. A table showing the trade, trade weight, trade entry date, risk allocation and levels for (average) entry, current, stop and target will be shown in the Strategic FX Portfolio Trade Recommendations section of the FX Pulse. If we increase the weighting allocated to a trade, the entry level published in the table will be changed to reflect a proportionally weighted rate of the initial entry level and the entry level on the date the weight was increased. Performance Statistics We rebalance our portfolio daily at the NY close to keep the weight of each trade consistent with the published weight. We will primarily enter and exit trades using the bid or offer rate of the WMR fixing. If we make an intraday change to our portfolio, we will cite the closest Bloomberg half hourly fix in our published note and enter/exit at this rate. Stops or targets will be triggered if the stated level is met at the WMR fix. Returns shown include the cost of carry using the 1W interbank deposit rate if this is quoted liquidly but do not include any other expenses, slippage or fees and no interest on cash holdings are included. Reported returns are not levered. We have re-estimated our returns from 22 June 2006 to 10 June 2010, when we re-launched the portfolio, to take into account our more robust calculation technique. We provide a monthly breakdown of our historical portfolio performance back to Jan 2005 in the Strategic FX Portfolio section of the Pulse. The FX Tactical Indicators table highlights the most recently updated indicators we, as a research team, use as inputs to generate both longer and more tactical forecasts. Matrix charting codes are given in brackets. Change the G10 currency in italics as required. •Historical Currency Performance: Price changes in currency over the past week and past month. (EURUSD) •FXVIX (Volatility Index): An index of 3 month implied volatility calculated using 30 G10 and EM crosses (MSFXVIX) •Relative Momentum Indicator: Measures the momentum of a currency relative to all other currencies; not indicative of historical performance. (MSRMUS) •MS GRDI*: An index to assess risk sentiment. It looks at ten different asset classes to gauge risk demand. The GRDI index seen in the graph is a standardized reading of the index based on the 365-day rolling average. (GRDIIDX) •G10 Surprise Index: Measures the performance of actual economic data in G10 countries relative to expectations. G10 Average Index is a simple index; G10 GDP weighted average is based on GDP weights. (MSSIUSD) •IMM Commitment of Traders Report: The “Aggregate USD Index” is the cumulative aggregate positioning of currencies we track on the IMM against the USD. We combine IMM positioning on the AUD, CAD, CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, and MXN to calculate an aggregate USD index to measure overall net positioning. (MSPIUS) FX Positioning Tracker Methodology (MSPIUS) See the primer •MS Flow - Our internal flow data track all spot and forward trades transacted by Morgan Stanley FX globally. •IMM - We use the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s IMM report to track positioning of non-commercial traders. •Toshin - The Toshin accounts are Japanese foreign currency investment trusts that seek yield abroad. They typically cater to retail investors and offer a higher return by investing in foreign assets on a currency un-hedged basis. •TFX - The Tokyo Financial Exchange (TFX) measures Japanese currency trading on margin accounts, and comprises an estimated 10% of the retail margin market. •Beta - As an alternative proxy for positioning, our Beta-Tracker measures one-month rolling betas of currency managers’ and global macro hedge funds’ daily returns on major currency indices. •Sentiment - The Daily Sentiment Index gathers opinions on all active US futures, eurozone interest rates, and eurozone equities futures markets. Morgan Stanley Tactical Rich and Cheap Model methodology: See the full report (EURTRAC) Historic data for all these models can be found on the Morgan Stanley Matrix Platform. See New FX Strategy Interactive Features (January 17, 2014). Click on the Matrix logo throughout this document or here for a G10 currency reference page: * US Pat. No. 7,617,143. 25 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Global FX Strategy Team Head of Global FX Strategy (London) Hans Redeker, Managing Director [email protected] (44 20) 7425 2430 Co-Head of US FX Strategy (New York) Co-Head of US FX Strategy (New York) Currency Strategist (New York) Currency Strategist (New York) Evan Brown, CFA, Vice President Calvin Tse, Vice President Dara Blume, Associate Charles Rubenfeld, Analyst [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (212) 761 2786 (212) 296 5423 (212) 296 5786 (212) 296 5911 Head of European FX Strategy (London) Currency Strategist (London) Currency Strategist (London) Ian Stannard, Executive Director Sheena Shah, Analyst Vandit D. Shah, Analyst [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (44 20) 7677 2985 (44 20) 7677 6457 (44 20) 7425 3978 Head of Asia FX and Rates Strategy (Hong Kong) AXJ FX Strategy (Hong Kong) Rates/FX Strategist (Hong Kong) AXJ Strategy (Hong Kong) Geoffrey Kendrick, Executive Director Jessica Liang, Vice President Kewei Yang, Executive Director Kritika Kashyap, Associate [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (852) 2239 7399 (852) 3963 3021 (852) 3963 0562 (852) 2239 7179 LatAm Macro Strategy (New York) LatAm Local Rates Strategy (New York) Felipe Hernandez, Vice President Robert Habib, Associate [email protected] [email protected] (212) 296 4996 (212) 761 1875 Global EM Macro Strategy (London) CEEMEA Macro Strategy (London) James Lord, Executive Director Meena Bassily, Associate [email protected] [email protected] (44 20) 7677 3254 (44 20) 7677 0031 Morgan Stanley entities: London – Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc; New York – Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC; Hong Kong – Morgan Stanley Asia Limited. 26 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse This material includes trade flow data that have been compiled by the Morgan Stanley Foreign Exchange trading desks from transactions executed by Morgan Stanley in the over-the-counter foreign exchange markets with its global institutional and high net worth individual customer base. The data have been aggregated and anonymized in a manner that does not identify the underlying transactions of any particular customer. In compiling, interpreting, and analyzing the data, Morgan Stanley makes certain assumptions, which may vary over time, relating to the classification of an account as a client. No representation is made that the aggregated data are reflective of trading patterns or trends in the markets included in this material for any particular type of customer. Disclosure Section The information and opinions in Morgan Stanley Research were prepared or are disseminated by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and/or Morgan Stanley C.T.V.M. S.A. and/or Morgan Stanley Mexico, Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V. and/or Morgan Stanley Canada Limited and/or Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc and/or RMB Morgan Stanley (Proprietary) Limited and/or Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co., Ltd. and/or Morgan Stanley Capital Group Japan Co., Ltd. and/or Morgan Stanley Asia Limited and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H), regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (which accepts legal responsibility for its contents and should be contacted with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, Morgan Stanley Research) and/or Morgan Stanley Taiwan Limited and/or Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Seoul Branch, and/or Morgan Stanley Australia Limited (A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services license No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents), and/or Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Australia Pty Ltd (A.B.N. 19 009 145 555, holder of Australian financial services license No. 240813, which accepts responsibility for its contents), and/or Morgan Stanley India Company Private Limited, and/or PT Morgan Stanley Asia Indonesia and their affiliates (collectively, "Morgan Stanley"). For important disclosures, stock price charts and equity rating histories regarding companies that are the subject of this report, please see the Morgan Stanley Research Disclosure Website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures, or contact your investment representative or Morgan Stanley Research at 1585 Broadway, (Attention: Research Management), New York, NY, 10036 USA. For valuation methodology and risks associated with any price targets referenced in this research report, please contact the Client Support Team as follows: US/Canada +1 800 303-2495; Hong Kong +852 2848-5999; Latin America +1 718 754-5444 (U.S.); London +44 (0)20-7425-8169; Singapore +65 6834-6860; Sydney +61 (0)2-9770-1505; Tokyo +81 (0)3-6836-9000. Alternatively you may contact your investment representative or Morgan Stanley Research at 1585 Broadway, (Attention: Research Management), New York, NY 10036 USA. Global Research Conflict Management Policy Morgan Stanley Research has been published in accordance with our conflict management policy, which is available at www.morganstanley.com/institutional/research/conflictpolicies. Important Disclosures Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Morgan Stanley Research does not provide individually tailored investment advice. Morgan Stanley Research has been prepared without regard to the circumstances and objectives of those who receive it. Morgan Stanley recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial adviser. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor's circumstances and objectives. The securities, instruments, or strategies discussed in Morgan Stanley Research may not be suitable for all investors, and certain investors may not be eligible to purchase or participate in some or all of them. Morgan Stanley Research is not an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security/instrument or to participate in any particular trading strategy. The value of and income from your investments may vary because of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, default rates, prepayment rates, securities/instruments prices, market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies or other factors. There may be time limitations on the exercise of options or other rights in securities/instruments transactions. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. If provided, and unless otherwise stated, the closing price on the cover page is that of the primary exchange for the subject company's securities/instruments. The fixed income research analysts, strategists or economists principally responsible for the preparation of Morgan Stanley Research have received compensation based upon various factors, including quality, accuracy and value of research, firm profitability or revenues (which include fixed income trading and capital markets profitability or revenues), client feedback and competitive factors. Fixed Income Research analysts', strategists' or economists' compensation is not linked to investment banking or capital markets transactions performed by Morgan Stanley or the profitability or revenues of particular trading desks. With the exception of information regarding Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Research is based on public information. Morgan Stanley makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we make no representation that it is accurate or complete. We have no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in Morgan Stanley Research change apart from when we intend to discontinue equity research coverage of a subject company. Facts and views presented in Morgan Stanley Research have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other Morgan Stanley business areas, including investment banking personnel. Morgan Stanley may make investment decisions or take proprietary positions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views in this report. To our readers in Taiwan: Information on securities/instruments that trade in Taiwan is distributed by Morgan Stanley Taiwan Limited ("MSTL"). Such information is for your reference only. The reader should independently evaluate the investment risks and is solely responsible for their investment decisions. Morgan Stanley Research may not be distributed to the public media or quoted or used by the public media without the express written consent of Morgan Stanley. Information on securities/instruments that do not trade in Taiwan is for informational purposes only and is not to be construed as a recommendation or a solicitation to trade in such securities/instruments. MSTL may not execute transactions for clients in these securities/instruments. To our readers in Hong Kong: Information is distributed in Hong Kong by and on behalf of, and is attributable to, Morgan Stanley Asia Limited as part of its regulated activities in Hong Kong. If you have any queries concerning Morgan Stanley Research, please contact our Hong Kong sales representatives. Morgan Stanley is not incorporated under PRC law and the research in relation to this report is conducted outside the PRC. Morgan Stanley Research does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in the PRC. PRC investors shall have the relevant qualifications to invest in such securities and shall be responsible for obtaining all relevant approvals, licenses, verifications and/or registrations from the relevant governmental authorities themselves. Morgan Stanley Research is disseminated in Brazil by Morgan Stanley C.T.V.M. S.A.; in Japan by Morgan Stanley MUFG Securities Co., Ltd. and, for Commodities related research reports only, Morgan Stanley Capital Group Japan Co., Ltd; in Hong Kong by Morgan Stanley Asia Limited (which accepts responsibility for its contents) and by Bank Morgan Stanley AG, Hong Kong Branch; in Singapore by Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H), regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (which accepts legal responsibility for its contents and should be contacted with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, Morgan Stanley Research) and by Bank Morgan Stanley AG, Singapore Branch (Registration number T11FC0207F); in Australia to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act by Morgan Stanley Australia Limited A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services license No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents; in Australia to "wholesale clients" and "retail clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act by Morgan Stanley Wealth Management Australia Pty Ltd (A.B.N. 19 009 145 555, holder of 27 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH March 12, 2015 FX Pulse Australian financial services license No. 240813, which accepts responsibility for its contents; in Korea by Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Seoul Branch; in India by Morgan Stanley India Company Private Limited; in Vietnam this report is issued by Morgan Stanley Singapore Holdings; in Canada by Morgan Stanley Canada Limited, which has approved of and takes responsibility for its contents in Canada; in Germany by Morgan Stanley Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main and Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management Limited, Niederlassung Deutschland, regulated by Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); in Spain by Morgan Stanley, S.V., S.A., a Morgan Stanley group company, which is supervised by the Spanish Securities Markets Commission (CNMV) and states that Morgan Stanley Research has been written and distributed in accordance with the rules of conduct applicable to financial research as established under Spanish regulations; in the United States by Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, which accepts responsibility for its contents. Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, authorized by the Prudential Regulatory Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulatory Authority, disseminates in the UK research that it has prepared, and approves solely for the purposes of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, research which has been prepared by any of its affiliates. Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management Limited, authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, also disseminates Morgan Stanley Research in the UK. Private U.K. investors should obtain the advice of their Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc or Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management representative about the investments concerned. RMB Morgan Stanley (Proprietary) Limited is a member of the JSE Limited and regulated by the Financial Services Board in South Africa. RMB Morgan Stanley (Proprietary) Limited is a joint venture owned equally by Morgan Stanley International Holdings Inc. and RMB Investment Advisory (Proprietary) Limited, which is wholly owned by FirstRand Limited. The trademarks and service marks contained in Morgan Stanley Research are the property of their respective owners. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations relating to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the data they provide and shall not have liability for any damages relating to such data. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and S&P. Morgan Stanley Research or portions of it may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley. The information in Morgan Stanley Research is being communicated by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc (DIFC Branch), regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (the DFSA), and is directed at Professional Clients only, as defined by the DFSA. The financial products or financial services to which this research relates will only be made available to a customer who we are satisfied meets the regulatory criteria to be a Professional Client. The information in Morgan Stanley Research is being communicated by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc (QFC Branch), regulated by the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority (the QFCRA), and is directed at business customers and market counterparties only and is not intended for Retail Customers as defined by the QFCRA. As required by the Capital Markets Board of Turkey, investment information, comments and recommendations stated here, are not within the scope of investment advisory activity. Investment advisory service is provided exclusively to persons based on their risk and income preferences by the authorized firms. Comments and recommendations stated here are general in nature. These opinions may not fit to your financial status, risk and return preferences. For this reason, to make an investment decision by relying solely to this information stated here may not bring about outcomes that fit your expectations. 031215 dz/sm/jf 28 MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH The Americas 1585 Broadway New York, NY 10036-8293 United States Tel: +1 (1)212 761 4000 © 2015 Morgan Stanley Europe 20 Bank Street, Canary Wharf London E14 4AD United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 20 7 425 8000 Japan 1-9-7 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-8104 Japan Tel: +81 (0) 3 6836 5000 Asia/Pacific 1 Austin Road West Kowloon Hong Kong Tel: +852 2848 5200
© Copyright 2024