1. No category

Request for Qualifications
Phase 1 Architectural Services
Rebuild Potrero
Issue Date:
Wednesday, March 18th 2015
Title:
REBUILD POTRERO PHASE 1 (BLOCK X) ARCHITECT
Job Code:
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Issuing Entity & Address:
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
600 California, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94108
Site Location:
25th and Connecticut
San Francisco, CA 94107
All inquiries for information should be directed via e-mail to:
Emily Weinstein
Director, Rebuild Potrero
E-mail: [email protected]
PROPOSALS ARE TO BE MAILED TO:
Emily Weinstein
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
600 California Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, CA 94108
Sealed proposals for the services described herein will be received until 12:00 (noon) Pacific on
Wednesday, April 15, 2015. Proposals must reach the above address by the deadline stated. BRIDGE
Housing is not responsible for any expenses related to the preparation or presentation of this Request
for Qualifications (RFQ).
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
ARCHITECT FOR BLOCK X
POTRERO ANNEX AND TERRACE HOPE SF DEVELOPMENT
The City of San Francisco is considering development options for Potrero Terrace and Annex as
well as three other public housing sites in the city through HOPE SF, a program modeled after
the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOPE VI program. For
an explanation of the HOPE SF project please see www.HOPE‐SF.org.
BRIDGE Housing Corporation, on behalf of Potrero Community Associates LLC, is the master
developer of the Potrero Annex and Terrace (Potrero) HOPE SF site and is responsible for the
Master Planning, predevelopment, financing, construction, operation and provision of
community facilities for potential development of this 38-acre site. A proposed Master Plan has
been developed as part of the HOPE SF program administered by the San Francisco Housing
Authority (SFHA) and Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD). The
proposed Master Plan and potential development of the site is currently undergoing
environmental review. A Draft Environmental Impact Review and Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIR/DEIS) has been prepared for the Master Plan. Comments on the proposed
Master Plan have been received and are being reviewed and responses are being prepared. A
Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Impact Statement will be published
upon completion of the response to comments and any necessary revisions to the
environmental review documents.
BRIDGE desires to hire an architecture firm to provide architectural services for a potential
affordable family project on Block X within the Potrero HOPE SF site. The scope of work will
involve the production of schematic through working drawings for the site. In addition,
mechanical, plumbing, electrical, landscape and structural services will be part of this contract.
Local Business Enterprises (LBEs) certified by the San Francisco Contract Monitoring Division
(CMD) are strongly encouraged to submit qualifications in response to this RFQ. Certified LBEs
are eligible for a maximum of 10% Scoring Bonus (per Attachment 2, Part II, 2.01 B of the CMD
documents in Exhibit E. Note: the LBE 10% rating bonus is available only to firms certified as
small and/or micro LBE certified by CMD.
A. Description of Site and Development
The larger Potrero site is approximately 38 acres (including streets) in size and Block X is
approximately 40,000 square feet. As guided by the HOPE SF principles, the vision for potential
new development is to create a socially and economically integrated community knit together
by programs and services and by creating physical connections where they currently don’t exist.
As you can see in the existing conditions exhibit (attached), the existing barrack style public
housing structures are physically disconnected from the larger Potrero neighborhood.
Reconnecting the Annex and Terrace site to the greater Potrero Hill community is a
fundamental goal of the redevelopment effort. The proposed Master Plan outlines a proposed
projects and alternatives for the Potrero HOPE SF site as discussed in the environmental review
documents. Potential redevelopment may include replacement of the existing 606 public
housing units and the creation of additional affordable rental units, plus market rate homes.
Block X, a site currently owned by the SFUSD is being considered for inclusion in potential
redevelopment.
The Draft EIR/EIS prepared for the Potrero HOPE SF Master Plan includes a detailed discussion
of the Proposed Action and alternatives under consideration. They are:
■
■
■
■
Proposed Action (Proposed Project)
Alternative 1 – Reduced Development Alternative
Alternative 2 – Housing Replacement Alternative
Alternative 3 – No Project Alternative
The range of alternatives evaluated were chosen to select the appropriate mix of public
housing, below market-rate, and market-rate housing that would meet the various objectives
and goals of the project partners for the proposed Potrero HOPE SF Master Plan. These
objectives and goals include satisfying the purpose and need, creating a suitable variety of
economically integrated unit types, and satisfying the proposed project’s financial
requirements. A number of different development scenarios are being considered.
The Reduced Development Alternative would reduce the size of the proposed land uses and
associated parking and loading spaces as compared to the Proposed Project. This alternative
would construct up to 1,280 residential units, 15,000 sf of retail/flex space, 25,000 sf of
community space, and approximately 7 acres of open space. The Housing Replacement
Alternative contemplates only the replacement of the existing 620 public housing units on the
same building footprint as currently exists.
A detailed discussion of the various alternatives under consideration is provided in the Draft
Environmental
Review
Documents
which
are
available
at
http://www.sfplanning.org/index.aspx?page=1828.
Proposed Development of Parcel X:
The development and consultant team consists of:
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
Developer: BRIDGE Housing
Development Consultant: Curtis Development & Consulting
Master Plan Architect: Van Meter Williams Pollack (VMWP)
Civil Engineer: Carlile Macy
Geotechnical Engineer: ENGEO, Inc.
Sustainability consultant: SvR
Land Use Attorney: Steve Vettel of Farella Braun & Martel LLP
▪
Master Plan Landscape Architect: GLS
The Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development is coordinating the relevant City
agencies involved in the design review, permitting and construction monitoring of the
horizontal and vertical construction, such as the Planning Department and Department of
Public Works. The San Francisco Housing Authority will also be involved in reviewing issues and
plans and assisting the development team.
The project site is zoned RM-2. Under Section 206.2 of the Planning Code, RM-2 is defined as
Residential, Mixed-Use – Moderate Density. RM-2 Districts are generally similar to RM-1
Districts, which contain a mixture of dwelling types including those found in the RH (Residential,
House) Districts and apartment buildings in a variety of structures and a range of unit sizes. RM2 Districts tend to be greater in unit density and the variety of building types and unit sizes are
often more pronounced than RM-1 Districts. Where non-residential uses are allowed in the RM2 District, they tend to offer services for wider areas than RM-1 Districts. The project site is
within a 40-X Height and Bulk District which sets building height limits at 40 feet, with no bulk
restriction.
The proposed project is within the Showplace Square/Potrero Hill Area Plan, which is a part of
the greater Eastern Neighborhoods Area Plan, approved in January 2009. The Showplace
Square/Potrero Hill Area Plan identifies the proposed project site as an area that will be
redeveloped under the HOPE SF program.
B. Proposed Scope of Services, Deliverables, Budget
BRIDGE desires to hire an architectural firm to help develop plans for potential development of
Block X, which is shown in Exhibit B: Proposed Site Plan Over Existing to this RFQ. Block X is .75
acres. The site is located at the southern end of the site at the South East corner of 25th and
Connecticut. It is contemplated that Parcel X will be developed with 100% affordable rental
housing. Bridge is seeking proposals from firms for design and development work in accordance
with final development decision.
If an alternative that includes development of Parcel X is selected, BRIDGE desires to be ready
to commence construction upon issuance of an Authority to Use Grant Funds from HUD. Firms
should provide scheduling information on the proposed time frame for proposed project
implementation.
The landscape architect under contract to the developer will produce detailed landscape plans
with planting and tree selection, pavers and materials.
The civil engineer under contract with the developer will provide schematic level grading plans
for the building sites and their surroundings. The civil engineer will also provide schematic wet
and dry utility plans and typical street cross sections.
Architects will coordinate with these consultants and with the developer via monthly meetings,
with additional meetings in between as needed to maintain the schedule below. Approximately
6‐10 coordination meetings are anticipated.
The Potrero Annex and Terrace residents and the wider Potrero neighborhood have been
engaged in the master planning and design development to date. This involvement will
continue with the design of the buildings (and streets and open spaces). Architects will be
required to participate in two community design workshops.. A schedule of design activities is
under consideration depending upon the outcome of the Environmental Review process.
Anticipated schedule:
Activity One:
RFQ, interview, selection of architect
Activity Two
Execute contracts, kickoff meeting, start building studies/schematics
Activity Three:
Revise building schematics, prepare for community meeting
Activity Four:
Community meeting to review building schematics (all buildings)
Activity Five:
Revise building schematics using community feedback
Activity Six:
Community meeting to confirm schematics before we submit to Planning
Dept.
C. Local Business Enterprise and Other Program Requirements
If approved, the Potrero HOPE SF development will seek funding from the San Francisco
Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development, San Francisco Housing Authority, and
funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD, among other
sources. These public sources of funding require the compliance with various programs
regarding the participation of firms and community members in the development’s contracts:
1. San Francisco Local Business Enterprise Program (described below).
2. Section 3 Plan – The purpose of this program is to ensure that employment and other
economic opportunities presented through the development benefit low and very low
income persons to the greatest extent feasible. This includes specific numerical goals for
the employment of neighborhood residents and contracts with neighborhood
businesses.
3. San Francisco Housing Authority Resident Hires – The SFHA has a goal that 25% of the
residents of Potrero Annex and Terraces be employed through the development. The
San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Housing, Contract Monitoring Division and Housing
Authority are to negotiate an agreement that will reconcile these program requirements
and create a specific participation plan for HOPE SF developments. This development‐
specific plan will be applicable to the developers, and its consultants and contractors.
However, while this development‐specific participation plan is to be created, the City is
requiring the implementation of the City’s Local Business Enterprise program (“LBE”)
sanctioned by the San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 12B, Section 12B.4 and Chapter
14B and its implementing Rules and Regulations. Chapters 12B and 14B are administered by the
San Francisco Contract Monitoring Division (“CMD”). The development consultants and
contractors, including the architects, should include firms that have been certified by CMD as
Local Business Enterprises. Thus, architecture firms that are LBE are strongly encouraged to
apply. Firms that are not certified as LBE may work with firms that are certified as LBE, through
a joint venture or other contractual arrangement.
At this time, architects are not required to identify or select their sub consultants (engineers)
and are not expected to do so given the scope of work for the first 6 months. However, when
architects do proceed with the hiring of sub consultants, firms must comply with San Francisco
Administrative Code cited in the previous paragraph.
D. Selection Process and Timeline Architectural firms will be required to submit a Statement of
Qualifications with the information that is described in Section E below. A Selection Committee
composed of representatives of BRIDGE, Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community
Development, San Francisco Housing Authority, Potrero resident community and CMD will
implement the selection process and schedule that is outlined below. At the final step, the
Selection Committee will select a firm for contract negotiation.
End Date:
March 18, 2015
April 15, 2015
April 21, 2015
April 24, 2015
April 27, 2015
April 29, 2015
May 1, 2015
May 30, 2015
June 15, 2015
Week of June 22, 2015
July 6, 2015
Week of July 13, 2015
August 3, 2015
Tasks thru Schematic Design:
Issue/Post RFQ
Statement of Qualifications Submission Deadline
Selection Committee Review of Proposals and shortlist created
of no more than 5 firms
Interviews of Short Listed Firms
Notice to Selected Firm
Negotiate Scope and Budget
Kickoff Meeting
Coordination with Master Plan Architects
Revisions
Presentation of Design to Community
Additional Revisions, as needed
Final Plan and Community Meeting
Submission to Planning Department
E. Statement of Qualifications
Firms interested in submitting qualifications should submit eight (8) copies of their Statements
of Qualifications, along with an electronic copy, that include the information listed below. If two
or more firms are submitting their qualifications as a team, association or joint venture, all firms
must submit the information requested below. All Architects, including a team, association, or
joint venture (hereafter referred to as “teams”) will be evaluated on the responses to the
questions below. Architects will also be evaluated on their ability to provide the full range of
architectural services required for this proposed project. If a team is proposed, the team will be
evaluated on the ability of the individual firm’s qualifications to undertake the architectural
services that they are proposed to perform. For example, a member of a team that will produce
the construction documents but not the design will be evaluated on its qualification and
capacity to produce construction documents for the buildings.
Respondents are required to provide:
1. Brief introduction statement. Please provide a brief introduction to your firm or team and a
summary of your qualifications. If a team of two or more firms is proposed, please describe the
proposed services that each firm will perform for the proposed project. Please describe clearly
and briefly how the work will be divided between the firms in a team. If the proposed
architectural team has completed previous developments as a team, please include a
description of those developments and how the team was structured.
Maximum Score for Intro Statement: 10 points
2. Statement of experience in the design of a variety of affordable multifamily, new
construction, including type 3-A residential developments, modular prefabrication, and parking
stackers. Please submit evidence of your firm or team’s qualifications and capacity. To be
eligible for consideration for this proposed project your firm or team must have provided
design and construction administration services on at least two (2) new construction projects of
similar size as the affordable rental development listed under Section B, within the past ten (10)
years. At least one new construction project should be in San Francisco.
To describe your firm’s experience, please provide a list and photos of a maximum of five (5)
comparable developments that your firm has designed, including the development name,
location and size, unit mix, the firm’s role, construction date, general contractor’s name, list of
structural, mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineers, and client name and phone number.
Please include a short description of the community’s participation in the planning and design
in these developments, and how your firm facilitated that participation.
Maximum Score for Statement of Experience: 55 points
3. LBE participation. The Potrero HOPE SF development has a goal for participation by CMD‐
certified LBE Firms. LBE firms are strongly encouraged to submit proposals either as the sole
architect or a joint venture partner. Please submit the following forms that are in Exhibit D:
Form 2A, Form 3, Form 4 if applicable and Form 5. (LBE firms may be eligible for a Scoring
Bonus up to 10% as described in CMD Attachment 2 in the scoring of the proposals.)
Maximum score for LBE: 10 points
4. Willingness to hire residents. Please also submit a Statement confirming the willingness of
your firm/team to provide Potrero Annex and Terrace residents with an internship or job
opportunity in the future, as provided in Exhibit E.
Maximum score for Resident Hiring: 5 points
5. Resumes. Please identify and provide resumes, including relevant experience, for the key
individual(s) who would be assigned to this development if your firm is selected. Please indicate
the individuals’ tenure at the firm and describe their involvement in the projected listed in the
Statement of Experience.
Maximum Score for Resumes: 10 points
6. Fee Proposal. Please submit a fee proposal for your services described in Section B. Include
estimated reimbursable expenses as a separate line item. Please include a current schedule of
hourly rates.
Maximum Score for Proposal: 10 points
Total Maximum Score for Statement of Qualifications: 100
*LBE Rating Bonus. LBE firms will be eligible for a Scoring Bonus up to 10% added to their raw
overall scores as described in CMD Attachment 2 in the scoring of the proposals.
BRIDGE, on behalf of Potrero Community Associates LLC, will select the architects for contract
negotiation after an evaluation of the proposals received and interview of a shortlist of
candidates. The scoring criteria identified above will be used to develop both the shortlist and
the eventually selected firm or firms, if a joint venture. For the shortlisted firms, the results of
reference checks for proposed team members, the team’s performance during the interview,
and the team’s organizational structure and capacity, along with LBE rating bonus, will
determine the final scoring. The selection process will be monitored by the San Francisco
Contract Monitoring Division.
F. Submission Deadline
Submissions are due no later than 12:00pm (noon) on April 15, 2015 and should be delivered
to:
BRIDGE Housing Corporation
Attn: Emily Weinstein, Director of Rebuild Potrero
600 California Street, Suite 900, SF, CA, 94108
Phone: (415) 989.1111 ext 4037
[email protected]
If you have any questions regarding this RFQ, please direct them to Emily Weinstein.
G. Reservation of Rights
BRIDGE reserves the right to postpone or withdraw this request at any time and for any reason.
BRIDGE reserves the right to postpone the proposed project and/or to reject any and all
submittals. BRIDGE reserves the right to negotiate with any, or none, of the respondents.
BRIDGE reserves the right to waive any defects as to form or content of this RFP or any other
step in the selection process.
H. List of Exhibits to this RFQ:
Exhibit A: Aerial map of site
Exhibit B: Proposed Site Plan Over Existing
Exhibit C: Proposed Site Plan
Exhibit D: Site X Building Diagrams and Design Guidelines
Exhibit E: CMD Attachment 2, “Requirements for Architecture, Engineering and
Professional Services Contracts”
Exhibit F: Statement regarding Resident Hire
Exhibit A: Aerial map of site
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SIERRA Street
TURNER TERR
22nd Street
23rd Street
WATCHMAN WAY
Arkansas
Missouri
CAROLINA
Madera Street
KO
DA
road
TA
coral
Connecticut
Wisconsin
26th Street
Cesar Chavez
REBUILD POTRERO | EXISTING CONDITIONS
0
100’
200’
San Francisco, CA | OCTOBER 2010 | Environmental Evaluation Application UPDATE
PENNSYLVANIA
MISSISSIPPI
Texas
UT
TIC
EC
NN
CO
25th Street
Exhibit B: Proposed Site Plan Over Existing
EXISTING BUILDINGS OVER SITE PLAN
50.2
72.2
46.0
164.4
8units
197.4
197.6
131.4
41.3
8units
41.2
45.5
41.0
45.1
45.0
164.4
235.1
7units
131.6
8units
235.3
136.8
8units
7units
8units
136.8
131.3
185.8
6units
162.8
283.4
205.8
186.0
7units 8units
131.1
162.8
283.7
51.8
185.7
284.5
8units
125.5
162.0
6units
162.1
8units
125.5
47.2
6units
137.3
285.6
119.6
0units
111.2
8units
120.1
6units
204.6
286.5
195.3
288.3
289.4
290.3
155.8
111.2
7units
287.5
204.7
155.7
290.3
288.4
289.2
47.5
134.8
2units
8units
139.4
47.3
213.8
261.1
257.8
8units
213.8
232.1
15units
7units
141.4
4units 8units
215.0
241.2
11units
15units
186.0
224.6
15units
56.7
207.7
61.5
227.6
10units
15units
8units
207.4
215.1
154.0
171.1
15units
15units
179.1
162.6
15units
15units
169.5
170.0
167.6
168.2
15units
153.3
152.1
15units
192.8
165.7
194.1
153.2
165.2
194.5
62.1
15units
186.2
171.2
198.1
140.4
185.2
215.0
179.2
191.5
15units
236.1
132.1
152.1
15units
144.4
10units
148.2
168.2
146.1
173.8
147.2
132.2
196.8
201.9
15units
199.3
139.1
10units
124.3
15units
126.3
197.4
187.3
11units
8units
139.2
126.3
120.3
113.2
147.6
113.2
182.5
108.1
120.3
170.9
15units 11units
170.5
111.8
8units
10units
111.8
95.5
11units
0units
121.6
10units
122.3
11units
132.1
121.6
126.3
130.5
93.4
131.5
131.4
132.4
133.7
133.4
84.8
84.4
8units
119.3
11units
15units
76.7
76.5
77.2
77.2
81.2
76.7
19.3
18.3
17.1
19.4
11units
11units
15units
11units 10units
56.0
106.6
REBUILD POTRERO | SITE PLAN
SAN FRANCISCO, CA | MAY 28, 2014
18.3
17.2
18.3
18.5
56.0
17.2
Exhibit C: Proposed Site Plan
Exhibit D: Site X Building Diagrams and Design Guidelines
BLOCK X
ESTIMATED PROGRAM
SITE: 0.69 acres
60 UNITS - Type 3A & Type V
4 to 5 stories a one level parking podium
with stepping townhouses or flats along
25th Ave.
Parking Poidum - approximately 21,500 sf
Residential in Corridor Building 75,600 sf
Two stepping townhouses or walk-up flats
building diagram
Connecticut Street
25th Street
site plan
building diagram
Rebuild Potrero Design for Development Document
25
th
ST
R
EE
T
ET
TRE
UT S
IC
ECT
N
N
CO
5.2.13 - BLOCK X
Block X combines an existing small open space on SFHA land with SF
Unified School District land. The site may be developed as one building or
multiple buildings stepping up the site.
Design Guidelines
Prominent corner seen from 25th St.
CONNECTICUT ST
25th ST
Plan
99
a. The corner of the building located at 25th and Connecticut Streets should
be designed with a special architectural feature and presence.
Exhibit E: CMD Attachment 2, “Requirements for Architecture,
Engineering and Professional Services Contracts”
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Requirements for Architecture, Engineering, & Professional Services Contracts
FOR CONTRACTS $29,000 AND OVER
___________________________________________________________________
PART I. GENERAL
1.01
SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTERS 12B AND 14B
A. To be eligible for this contract award, prime proposers must agree to comply with the Local
Business Enterprise (LBE) requirements sanctioned by San Francisco Administrative Code
Chapter 12B, Section 12B.4 and Chapter 14B, and its implementing Rules and Regulations.
Chapters 12B and 14B are administered and monitored by the San Francisco Human Rights
Commission (HRC).
B. Chapters 12B and 14B and their implementing Rules and Regulations are incorporated by
reference herein as though fully set forth and provide that the failure of any proposer or consultant
to comply in good faith with these requirements shall be deemed a material breach of contract.
Copies of both Chapters 12B and 14B and their implementing rules and regulations are available
on the HRC website at www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights.
C. Chapter 14B allows for a ten percent (10%) rating discount for firms and non-profit organizations
certified by HRC on Architecture, Engineering, and Professional services contracts. The term
“rating discount” hereafter shall be known as “rating bonus” in HRC Attachment 2.
D. Certification Application
1. LBE Certification Application
a. Prime proposers must be certified as LBEs on the proposal due date to qualify for a rating
bonus.
b. Any proposer who is in the process of appealing the Director’s denial of certification or
revocation of certification for other contracts shall not be considered an LBE.
c. The Certification Application is available on the HRC website at
www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights.
For assistance with HRC Attachment 2, please contact the following number(s):
HRC Main Office (415) 252-2500 or LBE Certification Unit (415) 252-2537 or (415) 252-2530
For compliance and assistance with the Equal Benefits Program, please contact the HRC Main Office.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
1.02
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
SUBMISSION OF HRC FORMS
A. Unless otherwise authorized by HRC, the prime proposer must submit the following HRC forms in a
separate envelope marked “HRC Forms” with the proposal. Failure to complete or submit any of the
HRC Forms may cause the proposer to be deemed non-responsive and ineligible for contract award.
Review the specific instructions and requirements on each HRC form.
1. Form 2A: HRC Contract Participation Form: Identify LBE subconsultants, vendors, and lower
tier subconsultants listed on this form for LBE subconsultant credit. Check the appropriate box
under Ratings Bonus.
2. Form 2B: HRC “Good Faith Outreach” Requirements Form: Document solicitation of LBE
participation. This form must be submitted EVEN IF the LBE subconsultant goal has been met.
Attach supporting documentation.
3. Form 3: HRC Non-Discrimination Affidavit: Must be signed by Proposer under penalty of
perjury.
4. Form 4: HRC Joint Venture Form: Submit ONLY if the firms are requesting a rating bonus
based on LBE participation in a joint venture partnership.
5. Form 5: HRC Employment Form: List the key personnel and responsibilities of the Proposer,
Joint Venture partners, and Subconsultants.
6. HRC 12B-101 Form: Submit only if the Prime Consultant is not already in compliance with
Equal Benefits Requirements. This form is available on the HRC website at
www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights.
B. Note the following information:
1. HRC Attachment 2 forms are available on the HRC website at www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights.
2. For contracts over $10 million, the rating bonus is not applicable.
3. Except where the contract awarding authority has obtained a waiver from HRC, any proposal
submitted without a completed Form 2A and Form 2B may be deemed non-responsive and
rejected.
4. LBE subconsultant goal can only be met with HRC certified LBEs identified on the HRC LBE
directory website at www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights.
C. HRC Contract Performance Forms
The following HRC forms are submitted with progress and final payment requests.
Review instructions and specific information requested on each form:
1. Form 7: HRC Progress Payment Form: Submit to Contract Awarding Authority and to HRC
for each payment request. Note: Page 2; column “A” of the form, ALL firms must be
continuously listed including lower tier subconsultants for each payment request.
2. Form 9: HRC Payment Affidavit: Submit within ten (10) working days to Contract Awarding
Authority and HRC following receipt of each progress payment from the Contract Awarding
Authority. This form must be submitted EVEN IF there is no subconsultant payment and until
completion of the contract.
3. Form 8: HRC Exit Report and Affidavit: Submit with Form 7 to Contract Awarding Authority
and HRC. Each LBE subconsultant and vendor (including lower tier subconsultants and vendors)
must complete this form.
-2–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
4. Form 10: HRC Contract Modification Form: Submit with appropriate documentation when original
contract amount increases more than 20%.
Failure to submit any HRC contract performance forms may result in sanctions under Section
14B.11.C including but not limited to withholding or delaying progress and final payments.
1.03
“GOOD FAITH OUTREACH" REQUIREMENTS
A. All proposers shall achieve the LBE goal and undertake good faith outreach as set forth in Section
14B.8(C) of the ordinance to select subconsultants to meet the LBE goal. Proposals that do not
meet the LBE goal set under 14B.8(A) of the ordinance will be rejected as non-responsive unless
the HRC Director finds that the proposer diligently undertook all the good faith efforts required by
the Ordinance and that the failure to meet the goal resulted from an excusable error. The contract
awarding authority shall require proposers on the contracts to contact an LBE before listing that
LBE as a subconsultant in the proposal. A proposal that fails to comply with this requirement will
be rejected as non-responsive.
B. The proposer must perform the following seven (7) “good faith outreach” requirements:
(1) Attending any presolicitation or proposal meetings scheduled by the City to inform all
proposers of LBE program requirements for the project for which the contract is awarded;
(2) Identifying and selecting subconsulting opportunities to meet LBE goals;
(3) Advertising for LBE subconsultants and vendors by posting the opportunity in an accessible
location, specified by the City, not less than 10 calendar days before the date the proposals can
first be submitted. This applies only if the City gave public notice of the project not less than 15
calendar days prior to the date the proposals can first be submitted;
(4) Contacting LBEs certified to perform the identified work;
(5) Providing LBEs that have notified the proposers of their interest with adequate information
about the plans, specifications, and requirements for the work, provided that the Director may cap
the number of contacts required;
(6) Negotiating in good faith with LBEs, and not unjustifiably rejecting their bids or proposals;
and
(7) Advising and assisting interested LBEs to obtain bonds, lines of credit, or insurance required
by the City or the Proposer.
Note: Proposers are required to document and submit Form 2B and supporting documentation EVEN IF
the LBE subconsultant goal has been met.
C. Each proposer shall document “good faith outreach” and include the documentation with the
proposal. Such documentation shall include: (a) the dollar amount of each subconsultant and a
statement of the scope of work to be performed under the subcontract; (b) the identification of
each subcontract awarded to an LBE; (c) for each subcontract, copies of the subconsultant billing
rates submitted. Such documentation shall contain at least the billing rates and a description of the
scope of work. If no written billing rates were submitted by some or all of the subconsultants who
bid the job, the proposer shall submit a written statement containing (i) the amount of each
contract amount; and separately, for each subcontract, a full and complete statement of the
reason(s) for selection of the subconsultant. If the reason is based on relative qualifications, the
statement must address the particular qualifications at issue. If the reason is the respective billing
rates, the statement must state the amounts and describe the similarities and/or dissimilarities in
the scope of work covered by the billing rates. Proposers also shall maintain the documentation
-3–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
described in this paragraph for three years following submission of the proposal or completion of
the contract, whichever is later.
1.04
NON COMPLIANCE AND SANCTIONS
A. Non-Compliance with Chapter 14B
1. A complaint of discrimination or non-compliance concerning LBE participation initiated by any
party after contract award will be processed in accordance with Chapter 14B and its implementing
rules and regulations.
a. If the HRC Director determines that there is cause to believe that a consultant has failed to
comply with any of the requirements of the 14B ordinance, HRC rules and regulations, or
contract provisions pertaining to LBE participation, the HRC Director shall notify the contract
awarding authority and attempt to resolve the non-compliance through conference and
conciliation.
b. If the non-compliance is not resolved through conference and conciliation, the HRC Director
shall conduct an investigation and, where the Director so finds, issue a written Finding of
Non-Compliance.
c. The Director’s finding shall indicate whether the consultant acted in good faith or whether
noncompliance was based on willful or bad faith noncompliance with the requirements of
Chapter 14B, HRC rules and regulations, or contract provisions pertaining to LBE
participation.
2. Where the Director finds that the consultant acted in good faith, after affording the consultant
notice and an opportunity to be heard, the Director shall recommend that the contract awarding
authority take appropriate action. Where the Director finds willful or bad faith noncompliance, the
Director shall impose sanctions for each violation of the ordinance, HRC rules and regulations, or
contract provisions pertaining to LBE participation, which may include:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
reject all proposals;
declare a proposal non-responsive;
suspend a contract;
withhold funds;
assess penalties;
debarment;
deny HRC certification;
revoke HRC certification; or
pursuant to 14B.7(H)(2), assess liquidated damages in an amount equal to the
consultant’s net profit on the contract, 10% of the total amount of the contract or $1,000,
whichever is greatest as determined by HRC.
3. The Director's determination of non-compliance is subject to appeal pursuant to Rule XV.B(7).
4. An appeal by a consultant to the Commission shall not stay the Director's findings.
5. The HRC Director may require such reports, information and documentation from consultants,
subconsultants, contract awarding authorities, and heads of departments, divisions, and offices of
the City and County as are reasonably necessary to determine compliance with the requirements of
Chapter 14B.
-4–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
B. Procedure for the Collection of Penalties is as follows:
1. The HRC Director shall send a written notice to the Controller, the Mayor and to all contract
awarding authorities or City and County department officials overseeing any contract with the
proposer or consultant that a determination of bad faith non-compliance has been made and that all
payments due the proposer or consultant shall be withheld as agreed to by the prime consultant or
subconsultant and the City and County.
2. The HRC Director shall transmit a report to the Controller and other applicable City departments
to ensure that the liquidated damages are paid to the City.
PART II.
2.01
RATING BONUS
APPLICATION
A.
Eligibility for the LBE Rating bonus: Certified local business enterprises (LBEs) and non-profit
organizations are eligible for an LBE rating bonus on Architecture, Engineering, or Professional
Service contracts that have an estimated cost that exceeds $10,000.
B.
Application of the Rating bonus: The following rating bonus will apply to all proposals for
Architecture, Engineering, or Professional contracts estimated to cost over $10,000. The rating bonus
shall apply at each stage of the selection process, i.e., qualifications, proposals, and interviews. After
Proposers have been scored at each of the stages, the rating bonus will be applied to the scores as
follows:
1. 10% for HRC certified LBEs.
2. 10% for each joint venture, which is composed of only LBEs.
3. 5% for each joint venture which includes at least 35% (but less than 40%) prime participation by
certified LBEs.
4. A maximum of 7.5% for each joint venture that includes 40% or more in prime participation by
certified local LBEs.
5. The rating bonus will be applied by adding 5%, 7.5%, or 10% (as applicable) to the score of each
firm eligible for a bonus for purposes of determining the highest ranked firm.
C.
2.02
A.
The Rating Bonus does not apply for contracts estimated by the Contract Awarding Authority to be
$10 million and over.
JOINT VENTURE/PRIME ASSOCIATION
The LBE joint venture partner must be responsible for a clearly defined portion of the work to be
performed. The ratings bonus is applied only when the LBE partner has sufficient skill, experience,
and financial capacity to perform the portion of the work identified for the LBE. This portion must be
set forth in detail separately from the work to be performed by the non-LBE JV partner. The joint
venture partners must be of the same or similar discipline in order to be eligible for a rating bonus. The
joint venture partners will be jointly responsible for the overall project management, control, and
compliance with 14B requirements.
1. The LBE JV partner's work must be assigned a commercially significant dollar value of the prime
work and use its own employees and equipment.
2. Each member of the joint venture partner must perform a “commercially useful function” as that
term is defined by Section 14B.2 of the Chapter 14B ordinance. An LBE that relies on the
resources and personnel of a non-LBE firm will not be deemed to perform a “commercially useful
function.”
-5–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
3. Unless permission is granted by the HRC Director for good cause shown, the following actions are
prohibited: i) the non-LBE partner performing work for the LBE partner; ii) leasing of equipment
or property by the LBE partner from the non-LBE partner; and iii) the hiring of the non-LBE
partner’s employees by the LBE partner.
4. The LBE JV partner must share in the ownership, control, management and administrative
responsibilities, risks, and profit of the JV in direct proportion to its stated level of JV
participation.
5. The LBE JV partner must perform work that is commensurate with its experience.
6. A JV must submit an executed JV agreement and management plan detailing each JV partner’s
responsibilities and tasks.
B. A prime association or partnership is considered the same as a joint venture and will need to comply
with all the requirements stated above. Prior to award of the contract, the prime association partners
must also meet the following requirements:
1. A prime association must apply to the IRS for a new Federal ID number for that entity.
2. A new tax registration certificate must be obtained from the City Tax Collectors Office for that
entity.
C. The proposal items to be performed by LBE joint venture partners must be identified separately and all
work must be accounted for, including subconsulting work.
D. The cost of the work to be performed by the LBE JV partners is to be calculated as a percentage of the
work to be performed by the joint venture partners. The joint venture should deduct the amount of
work to be performed by subconsultants from its total contract amount. This percentage is used to
determine whether or not the joint venture is eligible for a rating bonus.
EXAMPLE:
Step 1. Calculate total JV partner work:
Total Contract Work
Percentage of Total Contract Work Performed by Subconsultants
Percentage of Total Contract Work Performed by JV partners
=
=
100%
40%
60%
Step 2. Calculate LBE JV partner work:
A
B
C
Description of JV Partners’ Scopes of Work
JV Partners’ Work
as a % of the total
contract
% of Task by
Non-LBE JV
Partner
% of Task by LBE
JV Partner
TASK 1
TASK 2
TASK 3
TASK 4
TOTAL JV Partner %
5%
20%
25%
10%
60%
3%
11%
12.5%
6%
32.5%
2%
9%
12.5%
4%
27.5%
-6–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
Step 3. Calculate LBE JV partner work as a percentage of the total JV partner work for the rating bonus.
Total LBE JV %
27.5%
÷
Total JV %
60%
=
45.8%
The LBE JV partner’s participation is 45.8%. The JV is therefore eligible for a 7.5% rating bonus.
PART III
3.01
SUBCONSULTANT PARTICIPATION
SUBCONSULTING GOAL
A. All proposers shall achieve the LBE subconsulting goal and undertake good faith outreach as set forth
in Section 14B.8(C) of the ordinance to select subconsultants to meet the LBE goal. Where there are
LBEs available for doing portions of the work normally performed by the proposer with its own staff,
the proposer will be expected to make good faith efforts to make portions of such work available for
LBEs.
Proposals that do not meet the LBE participation goal set under 14B.8(A) of the ordinance will be
rejected as non-responsive unless the HRC Director finds that the proposer diligently undertook all the
good faith efforts required by this ordinance and that the failure to meet the goal resulted from an
excusable error.
B. Proposers must identify on Form 2A the particular LBE subconsultants and lower tier subconsultants
to be utilized in performing the contract, specifying for each the percentage of participation, the type
of work to be performed and such information as the HRC reasonably shall require to determine the
responsiveness of the proposal.
The proposer must contact LBE subconsultants prior to listing them. LBEs must be certified with
HRC by the proposal due date to receive LBE subconsulting credit. Failure to comply with this
requirement will render a proposal non-responsive.
Additionally, subconsultants should not enter into any agreement that limits their ability to be listed or
utilized by more than one proposer.
For a directory of certified LBEs, please go to www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights.
C. Any subconsultant who is in the process of appealing the Director’s denial of certification or
revocation of certification shall not be considered an LBE.
D. The awarding proposer shall submit performance reports on LBE participation at 30%, 50%, 70%, and
90% completion to the Contracting Awarding Authority and HRC.
E. Determination and calculation of LBE subconsultant participation:
1. The LBE subconsultant shall be listed to perform a specific task, which is described in the RFP or
RFQ.
2. If the LBE subconsultant forms a joint venture with a non-LBE subconsultant, the LBE
subconsultant joint venture partner will be credited only for its portion of the work, as follows:
-7–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
EXAMPLE:
If the total subcontract amount = $ 1,000,000 of which
$510,000 is the LBE subcontract amount and $490,000 is the non-LBE subcontract amount, then
$510,000 is credited toward the LBE goal.
3. All work done by lower-tier LBE subconsultants will be credited toward meeting the goal.
EXAMPLE:
If the total subcontract amount = $1,000,000,
of which $200,000 is the lower-tier LBE subconsultant’s portion,
then $200,000 is credited toward the LBE goal.
4. The work provided by the LBE subconsultant must be the same or similar type of work performed
by the LBE in the normal course of its business.
5. If a Proposer owns or controls more than one business that is HRC certified as an LBE, the
proposer will not receive credit if it lists its other firms to meet the LBE subconsulting goal when
submitting as a prime. In determining ownership of a business, a business owned by proposer’s
spouse or domestic partner shall be deemed to be owned by the proposer.
6. It is the responsibility of the proposer to verify the subconsultant’s LBE certification status.
7. A certified LBE can only be utilized in the discipline(s) for which it is certified by HRC.
8. The LBE subconsultant must be utilized on the contract to perform a commercially useful
function. No credit will be given for a LBE that serves as a pass-through or conduit.
9. An LBE Prime proposer cannot list itself to meet the LBE subconsultant goal.
F. Substitution, removal, or contract modification of LBE:
No LBE subconsultant listed on Form 2A shall be substituted, removed from the contract or have its
contract, purchase order or other form of agreement modified in any way without prior HRC approval.
Additionally, no new subconsultants shall be added without prior HRC approval.
PART IV
4.01
EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION AND ECONOMICALLY
DISADVANTAGED WORKFORCE HIRING PROVISIONS
GENERAL
As a condition of contract award, Consultants and subconsultants shall comply with the
nondiscrimination in employment provisions required by Chapter 12B of the Administrative Code and
the hiring of economically disadvantaged persons as required by the City's First Source Hiring
Program, Chapter 83 of the Administrative Code.
4.02
A.
NONDISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS
Prior to the award of the contract, the consultant must agree that it does and will not, during the time
of the contract or any contract amendment, discriminate in the provision of benefits between its
employees with spouses and employees with domestic partners.
-8–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
B.
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
The consultant and subconsultants on this contract will not discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, sexual
orientation, gender identity, domestic partner status, marital status, disability or AIDS/HIV status,
weight, height, or association with members of classes protected under this chapter or in retaliation for
opposition to any practices forbidden under this chapter. Discrimination on the basis of sex includes
sexual harassment as defined in Section 16.9-25(b) of this Code. The Consultant, Contractor or
Subconsultant/Subcontractor will take action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that
employees are treated equally during employment, without regard to the fact or perception of their
race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity,
domestic partner status, marital status, disability, weight, height, or AIDS/HIV status. Such action
shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer;
recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rate of pay or other forms of
compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
C. Non-Compliance with Chapter 12B Prior to Contract Award
The consultant and any subconsultants must be in compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions
of Chapter 12B, on all existing City contracts prior to award of this contract.
Prior to the award of any City contract, the HRC has the authority to review the consultant's and
subconsultant's prior performance to ensure compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of
Chapter 12B.
If the HRC determines that there is cause to believe that a consultant or subconsultant is not in
compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of Chapter 12B, the HRC shall notify the contract
awarding authority and attempt to resolve the non-compliance through conciliation.
1. If the non-compliance cannot be resolved, the HRC shall submit to the consultant or subconsultant
and the contract awarding authority a written Finding of Non-compliance.
2. The HRC shall give the consultant or subconsultant an opportunity to appeal the Finding.
3. The HRC may stay the award of any contract to a consultant where the consultant or any
subconsultant is the subject of an investigation by written notice to the contract-awarding agency.
D. Complaints of Discrimination after Contract Award
1. A complaint of discrimination in employment initiated by any party after contract award shall be
processed in accordance with the HRC Rules of Procedure, adopted pursuant to Chapter 12B of
the San Francisco Administrative Code.
2. A finding of discrimination may result in imposition of appropriate sanctions, including:
a. There may be deducted from the amount payable to the consultant or subconsultant under this
contract a penalty of $50 for each person for each calendar day the person was discriminated
against in violation of the provisions of the contract.
b. The contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in part by the contract awarding
authority.
c. The consultant, subconsultant or vendor may be determined ineligible to perform work or
supply products on any City contract for a period not to exceed two years.
-9–
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
4.03
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
TRAINEES – FIRST SOURCE HIRING PROGRAM
A. Trainee Requirements: Consultants are required to comply with the City's First Source Program,
Administrative Code Section 83, which fosters employment opportunities for economically
disadvantaged individuals. Consultants are required to notify the First Source Program of all open,
entry-level positions and consider all program referrals fairly and equally. In addition the City
requires consultants to hire a minimum number of professional service trainees in the area of the
consultant's expertise. These hires count toward the First Source Hiring requirements. Trainees may
be obtained through the City's One Stop Employment Center, which works with various employment
and job training agencies/organizations or other employment referral source.
Number of Trainees
Project Fees
To Be Hired
$0 – $499,999
0
$500,000 – $899,999
1
$900,000 – $1,999,999
2
$2,000,000 – $4,999,999
3
$5,000,000 – $7,999,999
4
$8,000,000 – $10,999,999
5
$11,000,000 – $13,999,999
6
(> = $14M, for each additional $3 million in consultant fees, add one additional trainee)
2. The trainee must be hired by the prime consultant or by any subconsultant on the project team.
3. No trainee may be counted towards meeting more than one contract goal.
4. A trainee must meet qualifications for enrollment established under the City's First Source Hiring
Program as follows:
(i)
"Qualified" with reference to an economically disadvantaged individual shall mean an
individual who meets the minimum bona fide occupational qualifications provided by the
prospective employer to the San Francisco Workforce Development System in the job
availability notices required by the Program, and
(ii)
"Economically disadvantaged individual" shall mean an individual who is either: (1) eligible
for services under the Workforce Investment Act of 1988 (WIA) (29 U.S.C.A 2801 et seq.), as
determined by the San Francisco Private Industry Council; or (2) designated "economically
disadvantaged" for the First Source Hiring Administration, as an individual who is at risk of
relying upon, or returning to, public assistance.
5. On-the-job Training (to be provided by the consultant): The consultant shall hire the trainee on a fulltime basis for at least 12 months or on a part-time basis for 24 months, with prior approval offering
him/her on-the-job training which allows the trainee to progress on a career path.
6. A summary of a job description and training for the trainee with the rate of pay should be submitted
for approval.
7. The trainee’s commitment does not require that he/she is used only on this project, but also on other
projects under contract to the Architect, Engineering, or Professional firm, which is appropriate for the
trainee's skill development.
- 10 –
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 2A: HRC CONTRACT PARTICIPATION FORM
Section 1: This form must be submitted with the proposal or the proposal may be deemed non-responsive and
rejected. Prime Proposer, each Joint Venture Partner, Subconsultants, Vendors, and lower sub tiers must be listed
on this form. Only HRC certified LBEs can be used to meet the LBE subconsultant goal.
Be sure to check box for Rating Bonus. If more space is needed, attach additional copies of this form. This form is
also completed and submitted for all contract modifications, which exceed the original contract amount by more
that 20%.
RATING BONUS
Contract:
LBE 10%
Firm:
Joint Venture 7.5%
Joint Venture 5%
Joint Venture 10% (LBEs ONLY)
Contact Person:
No Rating Bonus Requested
Address:
City/ZIP
LBE Goal
%
Phone
TYPE *
*Type: Identify if prime (P), JV partner (J), Subconsultant (S), or Vendor (V)
PORTION OF WORK
Firm
(describe scope(s)
of work)
% OF
WORK
INDICA
TE
LBE
YES/NO
If an LBE,
Identify
MBE,
WBE,
or OBE *
% OF LBE
SUBWORK
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Total % of Work: 100%
Total LBE
Subconsulting%
I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I am utilizing the above
contractors for the portions of work and amounts as reflected in the Bid Documents for this Contract.
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature):
Date:
Print Name and Title:
* MBE = Minority Business Enterprise, WBE = Women Business Enterprise, OBE = Other Business Enterprise. See HRC
website (http://sfgov.org/site/uploadedfiles/sfhumanrights/directory/vlistS_1.htm) for each firm’s status.
- 11 –
01/2007
%
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
Section 2. Prime Proposer, Joint Venture Partners, Subconsultant, and Vendor Information
Provide information of each firm listed in Section 1 of this form. Firms which have previously worked on City
contracts may already have a vendor number. Vendor numbers of LBE firms are located in the HRC LBE website at
www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights. Use additional sheets if necessary.
FIRM NAME:
VENDOR #:
ADDRESS:
CITY, ST, ZIP:
FEDERAL ID #:
PHONE:
FAX:
SERVICE:
FIRM NAME:
VENDOR #:
ADDRESS:
CITY, ST, ZIP:
FEDERAL ID #:
PHONE:
FAX:
SERVICE:
FIRM NAME:
VENDOR #:
ADDRESS:
CITY, ST, ZIP:
FEDERAL ID #:
PHONE:
FAX:
SERVICE:
FIRM NAME:
VENDOR #:
ADDRESS:
CITY, ST, ZIP:
FEDERAL ID #:
PHONE:
FAX:
SERVICE:
FIRM NAME:
VENDOR #:
ADDRESS:
CITY, ST, ZIP:
FEDERAL ID #:
PHONE:
FAX:
SERVICE:
FIRM NAME:
VENDOR #:
ADDRESS:
CITY, ST, ZIP:
FEDERAL ID #:
PHONE:
FAX:
SERVICE:
- 12 –
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 2B: HRC “GOOD FAITH OUTREACH” REQUIREMENTS FORM
The Good Faith Outreach” form with the required supporting documentation must be completed and
submitted with the proposal EVEN IF the LBE subconsultant goal has been met. (Chapter 14B Ordinance,
Section 14B.8 – Subcontracting – C. “Good Faith Outreach”).
A proposer who fails to undertake the required “good faith outreach” steps listed below and who fails to
submit the documentation of “good faith outreach” shall be declared non-responsive, and the proposal will
be rejected. Answering “No” to any of the items below may result in the proposal being deemed nonresponsive and rejected.
Attach sheet(s) and respond to each numbered item and submit with this form.
1. Did your firm attend the pre-proposal meeting scheduled by the City to inform all
Proposers of LBE program requirements for this contract?
2. Did your firm identify and select subconsulting opportunities to meet the LBE goal?
a. Has your firm enclosed a list of disciplines and/or services selected?
3. Did your firm advertise, not less than 10 calendar days before the due date of the proposal,
in one or more daily or weekly Newspapers, trade association publications, LBE trade
oriented publications, trade journals, or other media, such as the Daily Pacific Builder,
Daily Construction Service, or the Bid and Contracts Section of the Office of Contract
Administration’s website?
a. Has your firm attached a copy of the “Advertisement?”
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
(The requirement of this item 3 only applies if the City gave public notice of the
RFP/RFQ not less than 15 calendar days prior to the proposal due date.)
4. Did your firm obtain from the HRC website www.sfgov.org/sfhumanrights the list of
certified LBEs?
Did your firm provide notice of interest in bidding on the contract to the certified LBEs for
each identified item (by trade) not less than 10 (ten) calendar days prior to the proposal
due date?
The number of firms to be notified:
If the HRC list identifies 1-25 available LBEs for the identified item (by trade), your firm must notify all of them.
If the HRC list identifies 26-50 LBEs for the identified item (by trade), your firm must notify 75% of the identified
firms.
If the HRC list identifies 51-75 LBEs for the identified item (by trade), your firm must notify 50% of the identified
firms.
If the HRC list identifies 76-100 LBEs for the identified item (by trade), your firm must notify 30% of the identified
firms.
If the HRC list identifies 101 or more LBEs for the identified item (by trade), your firm must notify 25% of identified
firms.
Did your firm contact the required number of LBE firms?
Yes
- 13 –
01/2007
No
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
Include documentation to verify the above-contacts:

If contact was made in writing, has your firm enclosed a copy of the request?
Yes
No

If contact was made via telephone, has your firm enclose copies of telephone logs?
Yes
No
5. Did your firm provide LBEs that have notified you of their interest with adequate
information about the plans, specifications, and requirements for the work?
Yes
No
6. Did your firm negotiate in good faith with LBEs, and not unjustifiably reject their
proposals?
Yes
No
7. Did your firm advise and assist interested LBEs to obtain bonds, lines of credit, or insurance
required by the City?
Yes
No
8. For each discipline and/or service your firm identified for LBE subconsulting outreach:

Has your firm enclosed copies of all written bids/proposals submitted, including those
from non-LBEs?
Yes
No

If oral bids/proposals were received, has your firm included a list of all such
bids/proposals, including those from non-LBEs (specify the discipline/service and dollar
amounts for each such bid/proposal)?
Yes
No

Has your firm included a full and complete statement of the reasons for selection of
the subconsultant for that trade? (If the reason is based on relative qualifications, the
statement must address the particular qualifications at issue. If the reason is based on
the proposal amounts, the statement must include the amounts and describe the
similarities and/or dissimilarities in the scope of work covered by the proposals.)
Yes
No
Signature of Owner/Authorized Representative:
Owner/Authorized Representative (Print)
Name of Firm (Print)
Title and Position
Address, City, ZIP
E-mail:
Date:
- 14 –
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 3: HRC NON-DISCRIMINATION AFFIDAVIT
1. I will ensure that my firm complies fully with the provisions of Chapter 14B of the San Francisco
Administrative Code and its implementing Rules and Regulations and attest to the truth and accuracy of
all information provided regarding such compliance.
2. I acknowledge and agree that any monetary penalty assessed against my firm by the Director of the
Human Rights Commission shall be payable to the City and County of San Francisco upon demand. I
further acknowledge and agree that any monetary penalty assessed may be withheld from any monies
due to my firm on any contract with the City and County of San Francisco.
3. I declare and swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
statements are true and correct and accurately reflect my intentions.
Signature of Owner/Authorized Representative:
Owner/Authorized Representative (Print)
Name of Firm (Print)
Title and Position
Address, City, ZIP
Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN):
Date:
- 15 –
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 4: HRC JOINT VENTURE FORM
This form must be submitted ONLY if the proposer is requesting a Joint Venture partnership with an LBE firm for the
rating bonus. The Joint Venture partners must submit a joint venture agreement and management plan with the
proposal. All work must be accounted for including subconsulting work.
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name of Contract or Project:
2. Name of all JV partners: (Check LBE if applicable)
LBE
3. Attach a copy of Joint Venture Agreement and Management plans.
4. The management plan must include the following information:
a. Describe in detail how decisions will be made for work distribution and compliance of LBE Joint Venture
participation.
b. Provide each Joint Venture partner’s specific duties and responsibilities (include organizational chart)
c. Identify the Location of Joint Venture Office.
d. Provide in detail how decision will be made for work distribution to LBE subconsultants and/or vendors.
e. Submit copies of bank signature cards with authorized names, titles, and address/city of the bank
(required after award of contract.)
5. Calculation of the Rating Bonus. See §2.02D of HRC Attachment 2 for an example.
If the joint venture partners are dividing the work according to a different formula than that described below,
please contact HRC staff and describe the arrangement in detail prior to submittal of proposal.
Joint venture partners are encouraged to meet with HRC regarding their joint venture prior to submitting
their proposal.
The rating bonus is awarded based on the LBE JV partner tasks calculated as a percentage of the total JV
partner tasks.
Step 1. Calculate total JV partner tasks.
Total Contract Tasks
=
100%
Percentage of Total Work to be Performed by Subconsultants
-
%
Percentage of JV partner tasks
=
%
- 16 –
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
Step 2. Calculate LBE JV partner tasks:
Description of JV partner Scopes of Work
(Specific details of work)
A
B
C
JV Partners’
Work as a % of
the total project
% of Task by
Non-LBE JV
Partner
% of Task by LBE
JV Partner
TOTAL JV %
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Step 3. Calculate LBE JV partner work as a percentage of the total JV partner work for the rating
bonus.
÷
Total LBE JV Partner %
Total JV %
=
%
JOINT VENTURE PARTNERS MUST SIGN THIS FORM
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Name and Title (Print)
Name and Title (Print)
Firm Name
Firm Name
Telephone
Date
Telephone
- 17 –
01/2007
Date
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 5: HRC EMPLOYMENT FORM
This form is to be submitted with the proposal.
1. Indicate personnel designated to work on this project for the entire project team (prime proposer, joint venture
partners, subconsultants, and vendors).
The employees listed should include all those listed in other sections of the proposal.
NAME OF FIRM
NAME OF EMPLOYEE
PROJECT ROLE
RACE
SEX
Indicate the Number of disadvantaged individuals that will be hired as on –the-job-trainees by the entire project
team. See §4.03 of HRC Attachment 2.
$
a. Estimated Project Fee:
b. HRC on-the-job training goal:
c.
Number of on-the-job-trainees that will be hired by the project team
d. If less than HRC goal, explain:
e. Length of training:
If less than 12 months, explain
Sign below including each joint venture partner.
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Name and Title (Print)
Name and Title (Print)
Firm Name
Firm Name
Telephone
Date
Telephone
- 18 –
01/2007
Date
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 7: HRC PROGRESS PAYMENT FORM
To be completed by Consultant and submitted to the Contract Awarding Authority and HRC with its monthly progress
payment application (transmit to the following):
TRANSMITTAL
TO:
Project Manager/Designee
COPY TO:
Firm:
HRC Contract Compliance Officer
Date:
SECTION 1. Fill in all the blanks
Contract Number:
Contract Name:
Reporting Period From:
To:
Progress Payment No:
The information submitted on Sections 1 and 2 of this form must be cumulative for the entire contract as opposed
to individual task orders. Additionally, the information submitted on Sections 1 and 2 of this form must be
accurate for the progress payment period immediately preceding that of the current payment application
attached herewith
1. Amount of Prime Contract:
$
2. Amount of Amendments and Modifications to Date:
$
3. Total Contract to Date including Amendments and Modifications (Line 1 + Line 2):
$
4. Sub-total Amount Invoiced this submittal period: Professional Fees
$
5. Sub-total Amount Invoiced this submittal period: Reimbursable Expenses
$
6. Total Amount Invoiced this submittal period (Line 4 + Line 5):
$
7. Total Amount Paid to Date including Retainage Received:
$
8. Amount of Progress Payments Requested to Date:
$
%
9. Percent Completed (Line 8÷ Line 3):
Consultant, including each joint venture partner, must sign this form.
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Name (Print)
Name (Print)
Title (Print)
Title (Print)
Firm Name
Firm Name
Telephone
Fax
Telephone
Date
Fax
Date
- 19 –
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
SECTION 2. For column “A”, list the Prime Consultant, each joint venture partner and ALL subconsultants and vendors including 2nd and 3rd tier
subconsultants. Make copies if more space is needed. Attach copies of all invoices from subconsultants supporting the information
tabulated on this form and Consultant’s invoice and Contract Payment Authorization for the immediately preceding progress payment
period.
Notes: 1) ALL firms must be CONTINUOUSLY listed on column “A” regardless if a firm is not requesting payment and
2) Failure to submit all required information may lead to partial withholding of progress or final payment.
Identify LBE Goal of this contract:
F
G
H
Amount of Progress
Payments received and
Invoiced to Date,
including amount
invoiced this reporting
period (F).
Percent Complete to Date
(G÷E)
E
Amount Invoiced this
Reporting Period
D
Total Amount of Contract
or Purchase Order to
Date +/− Modifications
(C + D) or (C−D)
Service Performed
C
Amount of
Modifications to Date
Name of Firm.
List prime consultant,
including each JV
partner, and all
subconsultants including
lower tier LBE
subconsultants
& vendors. Indicate if
the firm is an LBE
B
Amount of Contract or
Purchase order at time
of Award
A
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
LBE Sub-Totals
%
Professional Fees
%
Reimbursable Expenses
%
CONTRACT TOTALS
%
- 20 01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 9: HRC PAYMENT AFFIDAVIT
Consultant or Joint Venture partners must submit this form to the Contract Awarding Authority and HRC within
ten (10) working days following receipt of each progress payment from the Contract Awarding Authority. This
form must be submitted EVEN if there is no sub payment of this reporting period and until completion of the
contract.
Check box and sign below if there is no sub payment for this reporting period.
TO:
Project Manager/Designee
COPY TO:
Firm:
HRC Contract Compliance Officer
Date:
List the following information for each progress payment received from the Contract Awarding Authority. Use
additional sheets to include complete payment information for all subconsultants and vendors (including lower
tiers utilized on this Contract. Failure to submit all required information may lead to partial withholding of
progress payment.
Contract Number:
Contract Name:
Contract Awarding Department:
Progress Payment No.:
Amount Received:
Period Ending:
$
Date:
Subconsultant/Vendor Name
Warrant/Check No.:
Business Address
Amount Paid
Payment
Date
Check
Number
$
$
$
$
$
$
I/We declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above information is
complete, that the tabulated amounts paid to date are accurate and correct.
Prime consultant, including each joint venture partner, must sign this form (use additional sheets if
necessary)
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Name (Print)
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Title
Name (Print)
Firm Name
Telephone
Title
Firm Name
Date
Telephone
- 21 01/2007
Date
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 8: HRC EXIT REPORT AND AFFIVADIT
Prime Consultant must complete and sign this form (Sections 1 and 3) for each LBE subconsultant (incl. lower tier LBE
subconsultants) and supplier. LBE Subconsultants must complete and sign Section 2 of this form. These forms should be submitted
to the Contract Awarding Authority with the final progress payment request.
TRANSMITTAL
TO:
COPY:
Project Manager/Designee
FROM (Consultant):
HRC Contract Compliance Officer
Date Transmitted:
SECTION 1.
Reporting Date:
Contract Name:
Name of LBE:
Portion of Work (Trade):
Original LBE Contract Amount:
$
Change Orders, Amendments, Modifications
$
Final LBE Contract Amount:
$
Amount of Progress Payments Paid to Date:
$
Amount further subbed out to non LBE firms:
$
Amount Owing including all Change Orders, Amendments and Modifications
$
Explanation by Consultant if the final contract amount for this LBE is less than the original contract amount:
SECTION 2.
To be signed by the LBE Subconsultant or vendor:
I agree
I disagree
Explanation by LBE if it is in disagreement with the above explanation, or with the information on this form:
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Name and Title (Print)
Firm Name
Telephone
- 22 –
01/2007
Date
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
SECTION 3.
I declare, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the information contained in Section 1 of this
form is complete, that the tabulated amounts paid to date are accurate and correct, and that the tabulated amounts owing
will be paid within three (3) days after the date of the City’s final payment under the Contract.
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Name and Title (Print)
Firm Name
Telephone
Date
- 23 –
01/2007
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
CHAPTER 14B
HRC ATTACHMENT 2
Architecture, Engineering, and Professional Services
FORM 10: HRC CONTRACT MODIFICATION FORM
Consultant or Joint Venture Partners must submit this form with the required supporting documentation when
processing the first contract amendment, modification or change order that cumulatively increases the original
contract amount by more than 20%, and then for all subsequent requests. (This provision applies only to contracts
originally valued at $29,000 or more).
Name of Project/Contract Title:
Original Contract Amount:
Contract Amount as Modified to Date:
Amount of Current Modification Request:
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS:
1. Revised Form 2A reflecting the new overall contract amounts for the prime consultant, joint venture partners,
subconsultants, and vendors.
2. A list of all prior contract amendments, modifications, supplements and/or change orders leading up to this
modification, including those leading up to the amendment which increased the original contract amount by
more than 20%.
3. A list of the consultants, joint venture partners, and vendors working on this amendment, modification, or
change order with the contract dollars for each individual firm.
4. A brief description of the work to be performed under this amendment, modification, or change order.
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Name (Print)
Owner/Authorized Representative (Signature)
Title
Name (Print)
Firm Name
Telephone
Title
Firm Name
Date
Telephone
- 24 –
01/2007
Date
Exhibit F: Statement regarding Resident Hire
Exhibit F to RFQ for Architects for Potrero HOPE SF
Statement regarding willingness to train and/or hire a resident
By signing below, I am confirming that our firm is willing to work with the developer, BRIDGE
Housing Corporation, on behalf of Potrero Community Associates LLC, to create opportunities
for residents of Potrero Annex and Terrace to intern or be employed at our firm in the future, at
a duration to be determined in conjunction with the developers. We understand that our firm,
if it is part of the Potrero HOPE SF development team, can be an important resource in not only
the physical development of Potrero HOPE SF, but also in the economic development of the
community through job training and employment of residents. (See CMD Attachment 2, Section
4.01 through 4.03)
Signed:
Name:
Title:
Firm Name:
Date: