Sustainable change: stronger families, effective networks, better outcomes Presented by: Veronica Watt and Justin Douglas Reducing Youth Offending Programme, Multisystemic Therapy, Child, Youth and Family Session overview > Multisystemic Therapy (MST): the model and evidence base > Local implementation in Aotearoa > RYOP MST in Auckland: bringing the model into our specific context- richness, complexity and sustainable outcomes in our whānau / families. What is MST? > An intensive family and community-based treatment for antisocial behaviour in youth > Focus is on empowering caregivers (parents) to solve current and future problems > MST “client” is the entire ecology of the young person – family, peers, school, neighbourhood. MST Beliefs > Families and communities are central and essential partners and collaborators in MST treatment (Manaakitanga, Kaitiakitanga) > Families can live successfully without formal mandated services (Whakamanawa) > Change can occur quickly > Science/research provides valuable guidance. How is MST implemented? > A single therapist works intensively with four to six families at a time > 24 hour, 7 days a week on call system > 20 weeks (5 months) is the typical treatment time > Work is done in the community, home, school, neighbourhood to remove any barrier to service access > Is not dependent on the youth engaging in treatment. MST Principles and Bicultural Practice > MST - Nine Treatment Principles > Bicultural Practice Framework: Eight Pou to guide / anchor accountable practice > Strong alignment: MST by definition is multicultural and multiagency in its ecological approach > Flexibility within a framework for culturally responsive and meaningful practice. Principles in practice Multisystemic Therapy (MST) CYF Pou Waru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Finding the fit Positive and strength focused Increasing responsibility Present focused, action-oriented and well-defined Targeting sequences Developmentally appropriate Continuous effort Evaluation and accountability Generalization Te Reo Māori Whakamanawa Whakapapa Kaitiakitanga Manaakitanga Tikanga Rangatiratanga Wairuatanga Theoretical underpinnings > Bronfenbrenner's social ecological theory > Children and young people live in a social ecology of interconnected systems that impact their behaviour directly and indirectly > Influence is bidirectional and reciprocal (multifactorial and mutually influencing). Causal Model of Offending and Substance Misuse: Common Findings of 50+ Years of Research Neighbourhood/Community Context Family Prior Delinquent Behaviour Antisocial Peers School Antisocial Behaviour Evidence base over 30 years > 34 published outcomes, transportability and benchmarking studies including 23 randomized trials > 15 studies with youth offenders > 17 independent studies. > www.mstservices.com/outcomestudies.pdf Consistent outcomes Compared with control groups MST cohorts have: > Decreased long-term rates of re-arrest > Decreases in long-term rates of days in out of home placement > Increased school attendance and performance Improved family relations and functioning > Decreased adolescent substance use. But none of this happens without adherence to MST MST in Aotearoa > MST has a 14 year history here: the first MST teams were established in NZ in 2001 > We currently have eight MST teams in NZ > Child, Youth and Family Auckland (RYOP)- two teams > Youth Horizons Trust (YHT) > Richmond NZ Ltd- three teams (Wellington, Wairarapa and Christchurch) > Central Health Ltd > Links back to MST Services and Institute. RYOP: Reducing Youth Offending Programme, Child, Youth and Family > Established 2003 initially as two phase pilot > Two evaluations that informed service delivery changes (2006 and 2008) > Two teams in Auckland metropolitan area: one programme manager, two supervisors, eight therapists from diverse personal and professional backgrounds > National MST consultant - weekly contact. Eligibility criteria Child Offenders must have an intention to charge by Police, who are prepared to place a declaration for Care and Protection before the Family Court under section 14(1)(e). Youth Offenders must have admitted an offence, and generally have had at least two previous Youth Justice FGCs for offending. Additionally, clients must: - Be aged 10 to 16 years - Have a Risk Score of at least 32 from the Risk Screen for Child or Youth Offenders - Have (an) identified primary caregiver(s) who is prepared to act in a parental role and participate fully in the Programme - Not have committed sexual offences only - Not be actively psychotic, suicidal, or homicidal, or in need of crisis stabilisation at the time of referral - Have signed an agreement to take part in the referral process and the Programme - Have sufficient intellectual and language capacity to benefit from taking part in the Programme. RYOP Client Group > Young people at high risk of reoffending/ chronic offending > Age group 10-16 for index client > 2014-15 referrals: 116 young people > 100 male and 16 female > 60% Māori; 20% Pacific Island > 10% child offenders (10-13 years) > 90% 14 years or older. Introducing Jamie (all names changed) > 14-year-old young man with whakapapa here in Aotearoa and elsewhere in the Pacific ocean > Excluded from two mainstream schools; now in alternative education; stopped all sports activities > Brief period with mother but mostly raised by maternal grandmother; now living with maternal grandfather after short period in group home; never met father > Significant use of alcohol and drugs (especially synthetic and herbal cannabis) > Offending profile: assault, wilful damage, intentional damage, insulting language > Allocated to a Māori female therapist MST Analytical process Referral Behavior Desired Outcomes of Family and Other Key Participants MST Analytical Process Overarching Goals Environment of Alignment and Engagement of Family and Key Participants MST Conceptualization of “Fit” Re-evaluate Prioritize Assessment of Advances & Barriers to Intervention Effectiveness Intermediary Goals Measure Intervention Implementation Do Intervention Development Environment of Alignment and Engagement of Family and Key Participants Assessment > > > > > > Environment of engagement and alignment Genogram Reasons for referral: clear behavioural description Initial goals and desired outcomes Strengths and struggles ecological assessment Finding the “fit” between the identified problems and their broader systemic context (MST conceptualisation/ hypothesis development) > Overarching goals. Desired outcomes > Jamie: Go home and stay home, get a job and show everyone I can do the right thing, stay at school > Grandfather: Have Jamie home, Get help to know what to do when he gets angry, have family on same page to manage Jamie safely, go back to mainstream school, play a sport > Mum: Jamie stop using drugs, not go down same path as me, go to school and work experience, stop threatening family members > Also taken from Police Youth Aid, Youth Justice Social Worker and two other whānau members. Practice: Understanding the fit > Text goes here Lack of – Second level coping • Third level strategies AOD use Unrealistic and unclear expectations Why did Jamie offend? Increases aggression to get what he wants Not in education Parenting styles different in different homes Antisocial peers Age and stage (development al needs) Treatment > Intermediary Goals: logical steps to achieving Overarching Goals that target immediate and powerful drivers of a behaviour or interaction pattern > Weekly and daily goals (Principle 7) > Observable change (Principle 8) > Make use of strengths (Principle 2) > Makes use of empirically validated methods • (CBT, behavioural tracking and monitoring, rules, rewards and consequences, structural and strategic family therapy approaches) • (Principles 2,4,5 and 6) > Maintenance planning and discharge (Principle 9). Intermediary Goals > Increase granddad's communication between home and school (Rangatiratanga ) i. ii. iii. > Improve positive communication at home (Wairuatanga, Whakapapa, Tikanga) i. ii. iii. iv. > Granddad will speak to education provider re attendance and behaviour Therapist will cross check reports Granddad will schedule a school meeting to establish a behaviour plan Granddad and Jamie will have one meal together each day Granddad and Jamie will share updates on their day Both will make use of their own spaces during potentially conflictual situations Granddad will praise Jamie for positive communication efforts Granddad will establish effective rules and consequence (Kaitiakitanga, Whakamanawa) i. ii. iii. Therapist and granddad will complete a FIT assessment on lack of rules and consequences Therapist and granddad will develop appropriate rules an consequences Granddad will consult with Jamie on rules an consequences during a calm time. Quality assurance > High adherence to the model determines the quality of delivery and outcomes > Adherence processes include: • • • • • • Weekly reports tracking progress and outcomes Weekly team and individual clinical supervision Weekly telephone consultation TAM-R and SAM analysis Live supervised and taped sessions Changes tracked for two years post treatment. Recent outcome data > At the end of treatment: 90% of young people were living at home 83% were at school/vocational placement 84% had no new arrests 100% improved family relations and parenting skills • 70% involved in prosocial activities. • • • • Why is MST successful? > Targets known causes of offending: Family relations, peer relations, school performance, community factors > Treatment is family/whānau driven and occurs in natural environment > Significant energy devoted to positive multiagency working > Continuous quality improvement at all levels > Fits well with bicultural practice framework > Cost effective: at least 3.17 to 1. Whatever happened to Jamie? > > > > > > > > > > Cultural connection: whakapapa, Te Reo Māori Education with vocational aspiration No reoffending Reduced AOD Improved family relationships Clear authority, guidance and boundaries Improved monitoring and supervision Prosocial activities Improved multiagency relationships Community links and resources. Voice of the whānau > At first I just couldn’t get it together, but [the therapist] persevered and was really tactful about getting me to answer questions that helped. There’s been a turnaround in his behaviour over the last couple of months which is great. > [The therapist] is wonderful. She's helped me a lot especially to realise that I was part of his problem, always letting him do what he wanted. Now she's helping me to say no to him and helping him to take responsibility for things he should have been doing all along. > At first I was sceptical cause I like to keep family business in the family so it was hard to accept that we all needed help. When [the therapist] came and listened and I talked things through with her I realised that I was part of the problem and that I needed to change what I was doing. I am forever grateful for her support.
© Copyright 2024