• Scenario #1
• The American Herald likes to go into depth on
stories that are published by other
newspapers from time to time. THE REIGN OF
THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST published an
article entitled “Perpetrators Exposed” on
April 1, 2015.
American Herald
• The article goes into some details about
Manhattan Island. However, it did not dig
deep enough. So the American Herald decided
to put some scenarios together that would
help those who read the other article get a
bigger and better picture of the country as a
whole and their personal situation.
American Herald
• Scenario #1
• 1: Lets explore the possibility that all U.S.
citizens are correct that they have
constitutional protections and that the United
States is a country.
American Herald
• 2: Lets explore the idea that we had a
revolutionary war in 1776 under the
declaration of independence, the Articles of
Confederation was established in 1781, and
replaced by a better constitution in 1789
where the Federal Government was born and
the founding fathers had everyone’s best
interest at heart.
American Herald
• 3: It would mean in the present time that everyone that is
born in the United States is a U.S. citizen with birth right
citizenship and a resident of their State. Anyone that thinks
they are not subject to federal law is an anti-government nutjob and a danger to the American Society. It would also mean
that they hate democracy and are enemies and should be put
down like every other rebel in history. It would further make
sense that the American people are very patient and tolerant
of others and their political views and judge themselves as an
advanced society that tolerate the ignorant and
depraved. Anyone that cannot see how great the people are
and their constitution are terrorists that are jealous of the
American lifestyle and their freedoms, and how dare they
challenge the U.S. and its Military might.
American Herald
• IN scenario #1, that scenario should describe with
relative accuracy as to the view of most Americans.
• Here is a problem with scenario #1: On June 7,
1629, the Netherlands settled Manhattan Island as
a colony, and then an independent country that
does claim the right to establish colonies of its own
and has claimed the whole east coast and further to
the Mississippi River which apparently still stands
today.
American Herald
• Further, it established a central bank called the
Bank of New York 1784, known today as the Bank of
New York Mellon on Manhattan Island which means
it is a foreign Bank to the U.S. because remember,
the United States claims to be a country just like
Manhattan Island.
• Further, Manhattan Island is chartered from
the Netherlands which is also a foreign country to
the United States if in fact the United States is a
country of its own.
American Herald
• Further, this would also mean that Manhattan
Island, being its own country tied to the
Netherlands, finances the U.S. Treasury, and the
U.S. Congress etc… and the U.S. Treasury circulates
Manhattan Islands money which would technically
mean that the federal reserve notes would be a
foreign currency to the United States and the
U.S. The U.S. Treasury does have its own Treasury
Note that is debt free and interest free but fails to
circulate them to its own U.S. citizens.
American Herald
• If someone can correct this scenario, it would
be appreciated. If all courts in the U.S. and the
U.S. states will collect nothing but federal
reserve notes, that would mean that the
prisons, even public prisons would technically
belong to Manhattan Island, a foreign country,
foreign to the U.S.
American Herald
• Further, this would mean that the United States is allowing a
foreign country to traffic all U.S. citizens to a foreign State in all
court cases and other conditions. It would also mean that the
United States is enforcing tax collections on U.S. citizens in the
absence of any law requiring it to a foreign country thereby
subjecting all U.S. citizens to a foreign law and social
agreement. The currency of a country defines its independence
and its sovereignty. The federal reserve note belongs and
emanates from Manhattan Island, a foreign country. The United
States also allows U.S. citizens to pay the debt of a foreign country
and enslaves its citizens to that foreign country which means every
arrest is an Article 9 violation by every Public Officer of the U.S. or
U.S. state. “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention
or exile.” Arbitrary: a : not restrained or limited in the exercise of
power : ruling by absolute authority <an arbitrary government>
Scenario #2
This is the Netherlands Coat of Arms
Scenario #2
• This is the Coat of Arms for King George III
Scenario #2
Coat of Arms of Scotland
Scenario #2
• Coat of Arms of Charles I of Spain
Scenario #2
Scenario #2
• Coat of Arms of the Royal House of Bulgaria
Scenario #2
• East India Company coat of arms
Scenario #2
•
Related Article Dutch East Indies Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia : Dutch east india company - wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia The dutch east india company (dutch: vereenigde oostindische compagnie, voc, "united east india company")
was a chartered company established in 1602, when the states.
• Dutch East India coat of arms
Scenario #2
East India Company Flag
Scenario #2
• British East India Trading Company
Scenario #2
Above is an image of the George Washington family crest, or coat of
arms. Does it look familiar to anyone? It should. This coat of arms
dates all the way back to the 12th century to one of our George
Washington’s ancestors, and is believed to have inspired the American
flag.
Boston Tea Party
• 1. The “tea partiers” were not protesting a tax hike, but a
corporate tax break.
The protestors who caffeinated Boston Harbor were railing
against the Tea Act, which the British government enacted in
the spring of 1773. Rather than inflicting new levies, however,
the legislation actually reduced the total tax on tea sold in
America by the East India Company and would have allowed
colonists to purchase tea at half the price paid by British
consumers. The Tea Act, though, did leave in place the hated
three-pence-per-pound duty enacted by the Townshend Acts
in 1767, and it irked colonists as another instance of taxation
legislation being passed by Parliament without their input
and consent. The principle of self-governance, not the burden
of higher taxes, motivated political opposition to the Tea Act.
Boston Tea Party
• 2. Commercial interests, perhaps more than political
principles, motivated many protestors.
The Tea Act was a government bailout for a company on the
brink of financial collapse, the flailing East India Company,
which was deemed to be, in modern terms, “too big to fail.”
The legislation gave the East India Company a virtual
monopoly on the American tea trade, allowing it to bypass
colonial merchants as middlemen and to even undercut the
price of smuggled Dutch tea, which was widely consumed in
the colonies. Thus, the Tea Act directly threatened the
vested commercial interests of Boston’s wealthy merchants
and smugglers, such as John Hancock, who fomented the
revolt.
Boston Tea Party
• 3. George Washington condemned the Boston Tea
Party.
Although America’s foremost Revolutionary figure
wrote in June 1774 that “the cause of Boston…ever
will be considered as the cause of America,” he
strongly voiced his disapproval of “their conduct in
destroying the Tea.” Washington, like many other
elites, held private property to be sacrosanct and
believed the perpetrators should compensate the East
India Company for the damages.
Manhattan Island today
• The Netherlands ultimately owned the East
India Trading Company. The Dutch still claim
Manhattan Island today as a separate country
according to their charter.
United States of America today
• If no one can figure it out by now that the
United States of America 1789 is a company
connected to the East India Trading Company.
Then there is no talking to them. You can’t
make people believe what they refuse to hear.
The East India Trading Company did not like
the fact that the people formed a Confederacy
of 1781 to implement fair trade and do away
with monopolies.
United States of America, inc. today
• The East India Trading Company owned by the
Dutch did not like the fair trade idea, so they
formed an attack on The United States of America
and broke up the original Union. Then claimed
the original Union for their company and have
been lying about it ever since. Here is a little
document for those skeptics:
• http://reignoftheheavens.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/01/USA_INC_Corp_Regist
ration-2.pdf
The International Criminal Court at the
Hague, Netherlands
• If the Dutch violate Human Rights and commit
war crimes, they will always declare a
monopoly over Human Rights and War Crimes
as a force against these violations. This tactic
ensures the perpetrators are never convicted.
• United Nations: The UN Building is on
Manhattan Island to claim a monopoly on
which country is recognized or not recognized
by the Dutch East India Trading Company.
Manhattan Island
• Manhattan Island, a foreign country is
claiming a monopoly on the currency of all 50
States of the Union. A foreign currency that
comes with interest in the form of rents and
leases to use the currency. The company also
claims all of the railroads and power lines.
United States of America, Inc.
• The corporation is doing nothing but enforcing
a monopoly for the East India Trading
Company for the Dutch on the American
Continent through banking and S.W.I.F.T. That
is why it demonizes anyone that claims not to
be under the jurisdiction of federal law.
Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands
• One of the richest women in the world and to
hide it, she sold off a bunch into trusts.
•
Tyranny
• Everyone thought that the most tyrannical
people in the world were men. However, the
most tyrannical individual in the world is a
woman. The wealth of the Dutch is
maintained in secrecy and deception and if
anyone will notice, there are always
deceptions. Read next slide.
Invasion of WWII
• The involvement of the Netherlands in World War II began with its invasion
by Nazi Germany on 10 May 1940. The Netherlands had originally
proclaimed neutrality when war broke out in 1939, but Germany invaded
anyway.[1] On 15 May 1940, one day after the bombing of Rotterdam, the
Dutch forces surrendered. The Dutch government and the royal family
escaped and went into exile in Britain.
• Following the defeat, the Netherlands was placed under German
occupation, which endured in some areas until the German surrender in
May 1945. Active resistance was carried out by a small minority which grew
in the course of the occupation. The Germans deported the majority of the
country's Jews to Nazi concentration camps, with the cooperation of the
Dutch police and civil service; the Netherlands saw one of the highest levels
of collaboration during the Holocaust of any occupied country. 75% of the
country's Jewish population were killed during the conflict; a much higher
percentage than comparable countries, like Belgium and France
Scenario #2
• Now out of the two: Scenario #1 or #2, which
one sounds more plausible? Wake up folks,
you are being played like a fiddle.
• Monopoly attempts by the Dutch in America:
Water, guns, banking, currency, oil, law,
courts, prisons, everything you can imagine
and it only gets worse if people continue to
ignore the problem.
New World Order
• The New world Order is nothing but the same
old players trying to accomplish the same old
thing which is: Create a monopoly where ever
you can and punish those who resist anyway
you can. It is nothing to be afraid of and there
is nothing new under the sun.
American Herald
• Articles #1 and #2 written by the American
Herald on 04-04-2015.