1. business and industrial
2. agriculture and forestry
3. crops and seed

Integrated Watershed Management Programme
State Perspective and
Strategic Plan (SPSP)
PUNJAB
Submitted to
Department of Land Resources,
Ministry of Rural Development,
Government of India
State Perspective and Strategic Plan for IWMP, DoLRPUNJAB
1.
Introduction: An overview of State.
2.
Agro-climatic Zones
3.
Demography & Land Distribution
4.
Land Use Pattern.
5.
Trends in Agriculture & Food productivity.
6.
Implementation of Watershed Programmes in the state at present.
7.
Strategy for implementation of IWMP.
8.
Livelihood Concerns.
9.
Institutional Arrangement.
10. Capacity Building.
11. Monitoring and Evaluation.
12. Expected Outcomes.
Source: Statistical Abstract of Punjab; Department of Soil & Water Conservation, Punjab & line
departments.
State Perspective and Strategic Plan for IWMP – DoLR- PUNJAB
Chapter I
1.0
Introduction
Briefly describe physical features along with physical-cum-political map of the State.
The state of Punjab forms a part of Indo-Gangetic alluvial plane and is composed of sediments of Siwalik Hills and
Himalayas brought down and laid by the rivers of Indus system. The exact depth of the alluvium has not been
ascertained though it varies from a few meters to over 2000 meters. The state can be divided in to the following major
physiographic units.
a) Shiwalik hills
b) Piedmont plain
c) Alluvial plain
d) Sand plain
e) Flood plain
f) Palaeochannels
The Shiwalik Hills in the north-east are steeply sloping. The Shiwalik hills occupy nearly 2.6 percent area of the
state and cover sizeable area of Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur, NawanShehar, Rupnagar and S.A.S Nagar districts.
The piedmont area forms a transitional zone between the shiwalik hills and alluvial terraces. It is about 10 to 15
km wide and comprises of Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur, Nawanshaher, Rupnagar and SAS Nagar districts.
The Alluvial Plain/ terraces are the old flood plains of the rivers, the remnants of which lie above the level of
present river beds. Three major alluvial plains/terraces are popularly known as upper-Bari Doab covering most parts of
Tarn Taran, Amritsar and Gurdaspur districts, Bist Doab covering area between Beas and Satluj rivers and Malwa plain
area south of river Satluj.
The sand dunes are low ridges along the present and old courses of rivers and choes. At present, only 0.56% area
of the state is under Sand dunes.
The Flood plains of Ravi, Beas, Satluj and Ghaggar rivers and many seasonal rivulets cover nearly 10% area of the
state.
The Palaeo channels are believed to be the remnants of the old active channels. These areas occupy a low-lying
topographic position on the landscape.
2
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.1
Briefly describe drainage systems along with state map indicating major rivers.
The drainage system plays an important role in shaping the landscape of an area due to its erosional and
depositional nature. The Satluj, Beas and Ravi rivers form the main drainage system in the state of Punjab. The
other main drainage channels in Punjab are Ghahhar river, White Bein, Black Bein, Kiran nala, Chakki River and
Sakki Nala. In addition to these major drainage channels, these are numerous choes (seasonal rivulets), originating
in the Siwalik hills and drain the Kandi area. The natural gradient of the drainage channels is generally from northeast to south-west direction. In areas, where natural drainage is lacking, artificial drains have been dug up for the
disposal of storm water and seepage from waterlogged areas in the state. The drainage network map for the state
was updated using the satellite data acquired during the period from 2003-2004 and digitized for critical appraisal
of waterlogging, flooding and drainage congestion.
In Punjab, out of the total irrigated area, 29 percent is irrigated by canals and remaining 71 percent by tubewells.
There are six major canals system viz. Upper Bari Doab, Sirhind, Bikaner, Rajasthan, Bist Doab and Bhakra. Only
Upper Bari Doab Canal is taking off from river Ravi and the other five canals from river Satluj. The canal network
has been digitized for better perception of the command area of each major canal and their distributaries.
3
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
4
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.2
Brief description of all river basins
The indo-Gangetic plain, of which the Punjab is a part, stretches from the Yamuna river the east to Sulaiman
mountains (Pakistan) in the west and separates the peninsular from the extra-peninsular region. The whole
expanse of the plains, from one end to the other, is formed with unvarying monotony of Pleistocene and recent
alluvial deposits of the rivers of the Indo-Gangetic system. They have completely shrouded the old land surface to
a depth of hundreds of meters. This is one vast level plain with wide eroded channels within which the great rivers
have occasionally shifted their beds. The alluvial plain covers nearly two-third of the total geographical area of the
state.
The geological facts reveal that the Indo-Gangetic plain owes its origin to a depression of synclinal nature. The
origin of this depression or trough is intimately connected with the origin of the mountains, though its exact nature
is not known and is a matter of conjecture. This trough was later on filled up with enormous quantities of
sediments brought down from the mountains by the rivers of the Indo-Gangetic system. The exact depth of the
alluvium has not been ascertained, though it varies from less than 1,000 to over 2,000 meters. The alluvial
sdimentse comprise of massive beds of clay, silt, sand and gravels (Sehgal, 1970; Sehgal et al., 1973; Wadia,
1976) Geologically, the state of Punjab is formed by the alluvial deposits of various rivers flowing through Punjab,
namely Ravi, Beas, Satluj, Ghaggar and their tributaries. Based upon the period of deposition these are further sub
divided into recent, newer and older alluvial deposits.
The Siwalik range in the north-east of Punjab includes middle and lower Siwaliks. Thses hills are formed as a result
of the latest phase of Himalayan orogeny. Theses are composed of Pinjore boulders, conglomerates and poorly
lithified, soft and friable-sand stone and shales. The age of these deposits vary from Upper Miocene to Lower
Pleistocene. The piedmont plain in kandi Belt of Punjab state is characterized by coarse textured, poorly sorted,
sediments mixed with gravels and pebbles. It is formed due to coalescence of alluvial fans and is confined to
narrow belt along the Siwalik foot hills.
5
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.3
Demarcation of micro-watersheds along with code nos. on a map.
6
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1.4 Overview of the State
Table SPSP 1: State Profile*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Population (As per the 2001 Census)
Sl.
No
No. of
Blocks
Total no.
of villages
Total no. of
Gram Panchayats
Geographical
area in Ha.
Amritsar
9
746
708
267700
Gurdaspur
16
1617
1532
Name of District
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Male
SC
ST
Female
Others
SC
315411
1152821
356400
230068
S
T
Total
S
T
Others
% of
BPL to
total
population
Others
SC
274408
1004199
589819
1594018
29.6
701059
204238
622443
434306
1757808
9
Taran Taran
8
487
477
241900
141290
211935
121500
182265
262800
394200
31
Hoshiarpur
10
1417
1386
337000
196242
419250
181148
399566
377390
818816
18.48
Kapurthala
5
690
618
163000
119163
501453
1066245
206785
225787
976541
23.65
Jallandhar
10
950
934
263200
389067
897451
350695
687543
739762
965430
19.57
Nawanshahar
5
471
465
126000
109578
154936
101149
140739
210727
295675
0.05
Ropar
5
616
597
137600
69312
193946
61464
172368
130776
497091
12.2
S.A.S. Nagar
3
415
403
109300
67998
178743
55100
151221
123098
329964
11.6
Patiala
8
942
918
331900
200132
671358
176857
585532
376989
1256890
4.8
Fatehgarh
Sahib
5
444
442
114200
88087
202050
76949
70955
165036
373005
3.6
Ludhiana
12
915
897
370600
415679
1247037
342529
1027586
757962
2274869
12.5
Sangrur
9
576
573
360500
293515
494280
257961
427486
551476
921766
26.67
Barnala
3
125
124
141400
50273
231221
41211
204226
91494
435447
19.48
Moga
5
329
321
223200
151647
322492
133292
287423
284939
600915
3.14
Ferozepur
10
1004
968
526300
210329
715895
188080
631803
398409
1347698
2.61
Faridkot
2
171
163
147700
104984
56743
94273
654123
199257
176532
2.86
Mukatsar
4
8
234
284
234
280
263600
337600
147000
189652
248000
443157
146000
164980
237000
385506
293000
344632
485000
828663
13
8
Bathinda
Mansa
GRAND TOTAL
5
240
238
217100
110296
141
12673
1278
5036200
3714350
0
20198
98593
9064025
3314373
19786
0
8098555
208889
7028723
76098
0 17162580
7
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
3.90
12.18
1.5. Economic Development
a.
Brief description about the economic growth of the State, Growth of net state domestic product, per
capita income and comparison to national GDP and per capita income growth rate, sectoral
contribution to state domestic product, changes in occupational structure, data for last five years,
strategies for future economic growth of the State, any other important information about the State
Punjab has mainly Agriculture based Economy. Its average growth during 10th Plan has been 5.08% and the
Average Annual Compound Growth rate of gross State Income during 2006-07 has been 6.32%. The Net State domestic
Product at Factor Cost at current Prices has been Rs. 109459.44 Crores in the Year 2006-07 which has grown by 12.4%
against previous year figure. The Per capita Income at current prices in Punjab has been Rs. 40566/- as compared to the
National figure of Rs. 29642/- in the year 2006-07. The Gross State Domestic product was Rs. 123397.25 Crores in the
Year 2006-07 which constitutes a significant share of the National GDP. The per Capita Income Growth Rate in the state
has been more than 38% during the 10th Plan period. Agriculture with 30%, Industry 14% and Services (Tertiary) Sector
with 44% are the major contributors in the Gross State Domestic product. From the Year 2000 to 2006, the occupation in
the Govt. Sector has decreased from 69.73% to 66.78% while that in the Private sector has increased from 30.27% to
33.22%. for better economic growth in the future, the Agriculture Sector needs a major push/ support.
8
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
b.
Role of watershed management in the State – Importance of watershed programme for the State,
historical background of watershed development in the State, current status, expected outcomes,
etc.
Out of total 50.36 lakh Ha. of geographical area of Punjab, 41.84 Lakh Ha. (83%) is under cultivation. Out of
which, 40.78 Lakh Ha. (97.5%) is irrigated. However, only 11.93 Lakh Ha. (28.5%) of cultivated area is irrigated by
canals and the remaining 29.91 Lakh Ha. (71.5%) cultivated area depends upon rainfall and groundwater for irrigation.
The uneven & erratic rainfall over the years has lead to over-exploitation of the ground water resources of the state to
the extent that 103 blocks out of total 141 blocks have been declared 'Over-exploited' and the ground water table is
depleting at an average rate of 50cm annually. Poor ground water quality & water-logging is a major challenge in a few
areas of South-western districts. Further, rampant Paddy-wheat Cycle in about 34.67 Lakh Ha. (83%) has caused severe
damage to the soil health & structure in 39% area of the state. In this context, Watershed Management Programmes
have become highly important for not only reversing the trend of deteriorating quantity & quality of ground water but
also to prevent further soil degradation.
Watershed Development started by the GOI Ministry of Agriculture during the 8 th Plan with the National Watershed
Development programme for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA) and Flood Prone River-Ghaggar-River valley project (FPR-RVP)
schemes in the Northern kandi area (5.38 Lakh Ha., nearly 10% of the total geographical area) districts of Mohali, Ropar,
Nawanshaher, Gurdaspur & Hoshiarpur districts. The All India Soil & Land Use Survey (AISLUS) has divided this area into
138 watersheds comprising of 5.16 Lakh Ha. of treatable area, out of which 97 watersheds have already been taken up
covering an area of 1.30 lakh Ha.
The Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (IWDP) of the Ministry of Rural Development was started
during the 10th Plan period. Till date, 16 projects have been started in 12 districts covering an area of 0.66 Lakh Ha.
These Projects have been formulated based on the local problems of soil & water in the project area. 3 more IWDP
projects are being proposed covering 0.35 Lakh Ha. in 3 districts.
All the above programmes of Watershed Development shall play a big role not only in improving the state of soil &
water resources thereby improving production of food grains but shall also help in socio-economic development &
ecological development of the project areas.
9
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 2
2.0
Agro-climatic zones
Briefly describe the agro-climatic zones of the States including the soil types, rainfall, major crops,
etc.
The climate of Punjab is dominantly sub-tropical and monsoon type. The mean annual rainfall varies from about
1200 mm in Dhar block of Gurdaspur district (wettest) to less than 300mm at Abohar (driest). Soil moisture
regimes are udic, ustic and aridic and soil temperature regime is hyperthermic. The extent of variabilities in agroecological regions, soil characteristics (e.g texture, soil fertility, etc), ground water behavior, drainage, flood prone
areas, soli salinity/alkalinity, ground water quality, etc.
Based on soil and climatic parameters, the Punjab Agricultural University has divided Punjab into the following Agro
Climatic regions:1. Sub Mountainous undulating region or Kandi region.
2. Undulating plain region.
3. Central plain region.
4. Western plain region.
5. Southern plain region.
6. Flood Plain/Bet Area.
10
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Sub Mountainous undulating region or Kandi region
Kandi region as notified by Govt. of Punjab consists of all areas in Punjab lying to the east of Derabassi-ChandigarhRopar-Balachaur-Hoshiarpur-Mukerian road. Kandi region is spread over 22 blocks in 5 districts. The boundaries of
development blocks are not coterminous with the boundaries of Kandi region. Most blocks contain both Kandi and nonkandi area. Entire Kandi area has been declared as backward area. As the unit of development is a block, this artificial
demarcation creates some problems in the implementation of the programme. The total area of the Kandi region is not
known precisely but the total area of the above blocks is estimated to be 5 lac hectares or about 10% of the total area of
the state. Kandi area is one of the most backward area of the state. Most of the population depends on agriculture either
as farmers or as agricultural labourers. The few industrial units established to take advantage of subsidies in backward
areas are concentrated near Ropar and in few villages of Nawanshaher district. Most of the farmers have small (1-2 ha) or
marginal land holdings. Literacy especially amongst the women is very low.
Most of the adult males have been
traditionally working as laborers in the town, particularly in grain markets. Out migration which was earlier temporary is
now more of less permanent. Apart from agriculture and labour, other major sources of income are animal husbandry and
sale of trees from cultivated areas and illegally from forest areas. Many poor people particularly ladies from both farming
and landless labour families collect fuel wood from hills and store it at household level for sale. Sale of trees from
cultivated areas is also at the village level to petty contractor. Most of the villages lack facilities of all whether roads, good
schools and hospitals. The total normal rainfall of the Kandi region varies from about 800 to 1500 mm, about three fourths
of which is received during rainy season in a few rainy days. The normal winter (November to March) rainfall is bout 170
mm. The minimum temperature in Dec-Jan may be close to freezing and the maximum during May-June to about 45
degrees.
11
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
12
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Undulating plain region
In the Kandi region, undulating area just below the hills with 2-6% slope is used for raising crops mainly rainfed. Out of
total rainfed area of 3.75 Lac hectare in 1994-95 about 75% or 2.81 lac hectares is in the Kandi area. The average annual
rainfall of the area varies from 800mm to 1500mm with wide variations. About 80% of total rainfall is received in 3 months
from mid June to mid September. The aberrations include late start of monsoon season and its early withdrawl, long dry
spells within monsoon season and heavy showers received in a short period of 2-3 days. Open pan evaporation during
the growth period varies from about 2mm/day in December-January to about 5mm in last week of March and first week of
April. But in most of the years, maize fails because of lack of moisture at the time of maturity of crops and wheat cannot
be sown for the same reason. The entire 1.0 lac hectares rainfed wheat and 0.75 lac hectares maize is grown in this
region.
Cultivated Plain Area: Irrigated agriculture with shallow tubewells as source of water is practiced. The problems are
more or less the same as in Kandi choe related problems and other tubewell irrigated areas.
Central plain region
Extent: This region of non Kandi area of Gurdaspur, Hoshiarpur, Nawanshahar Roopnagar and Patiala districts, and
whole area of Jalandhar, Kapurthala Ludhiana and Fatehgarh Sahib districts and most of Sangrur and Amritsar districts.
The region constitute a little more than 50 per cent of the total area of the state.
Rainfall and irrigation: The rainfall in the region varies from 500-800 mm and about 80 per cent of which is received in a
short period 3 months (mid June to mid September). The region also receives lot of run off water from the Kandi area
through a number of channels like White Bein and Black Bein in Jalandhar and Kapurthala districts, Patiala Ki Rao and
Ghaggar in Patiala and Sangrur districts and number of Nalas originating in Kandi area of Gurdaspur and Amritsar
districts. Even though the area is irrigated by upper Bari Doab canal in Gurdaspur and Amritsar districts, Bist Doab canal
in Hoshiarpur Nawanshahar and Jalandhar districts, Sirhind Canal, Bhakra Main Canal in Ludhiana, Patiala and Sangrur
13
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
districts , however, except for Sangrur and Patiala districts the area irrigated by canals is very small. Major constraints of
the region are declining water table and soil sodicity and salinity.
Decline in water table: Directorate of water resources Punjab monitors the water levels at a large number of locations.
Data from 228 selected observations well between June 1983 and June 1990 were analyzed by the scientists of the
Punjab Agricultural University for 19 Agro Climatic zones, based on soils and canal system. Their conclusion is "The
study further brought out that present normative demands are not met. If the normative demands are met the fall in water
table will be much more. One may not agree with the methodology or absolute figures but it cannot be over looked that
ground water in the sweet water zone is being over exploited and if this trend continues, it may prove disastrous for
Punjab agriculture. Every effort should be made to halt this process and if possible reverse it."
Sodic Soils
kallar.
Large area of land in the Semi- Arid central plains of Punjab was Affected sodicity commonly known as
Most of these lands had been lying uncultivated for long where nothing grew.
The technology for the
improvement and reclamation of these soils was developed by the scientists of Central Soil Survey Research Institute
Karnal and that for rainfed areas was developed by Scientists of Punjab Agriculture University which essentially consisted
of (a) provision of a good quality ground water (b) and leveling (c) addition of gypsum (d) suitable cropping pattern and (e)
appropriate agronomic practices.
The Punjab Land Development Reclamation & Development Corporation in
coordination with the Agriculture department took up the work of reclamation of sodic soil on a large scale in early
eighties. As a result of these efforts 2 lac hectare area has been reclaimed.
Western plain region & Southern plain region
Climate: South western plains region comprises of Mansa, Bhatinda, Faridkot and Ferozepur districts. The total area of
the region is 17.14 lac hectares forming 35 per cent of the state. The rainfall varies from 260 mm in Abohar to 450 mm in
Ferozepur.
About 80 per cent of total rain is received in 3 months July to September but is not enough to meet
evaporative demand of the crop. Rainfall is not only low but also highly risky. Average annual mean temperature is about
14
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
25 degree C with the lowest minimum close to freezing point in December- January and highest (above 40 degree C) in
June.
Ground Water: Most of the ground water in the region have moderate to high salinity and sodicity hazards and thus
cannot be used for irrigation for prolonged periods.
Irrigation: Successful agriculture in the region is possible without irrigation. Ground water is either not available or not
suitable for irrigation because of high salinity or sodicity hazard. The only alternative is to provide canal irrigation. Sirhind
canal was the first canal to be constructed for providing irrigation to this area. Water from this canal head works at Ropar
on river Satluj was released in 1882. Now the region is being irrigated by following canal system.

Sirhind Canal

Sirhind Feeder

Eastern Canal
Out of total net irrigated area of 13.69 lac Hect. in the region in 1994-95, 9.66 lac hectare (71%) is irrigated by canals.
About two third of the net irrigated area of canals in the state is in this region. In recent years there has been an increase
in the tube well irrigated area, particularly in Ferozepur district where 46 per cent of total net area is irrigated by tube
wells. Because of the serious water quality problem this would need careful monitoring. In this south-western plains
region 88 per cent of total area is under cultivation. Cropping intensity in the region is 179 and of the total 27.75 lac
hectares cropped area, 26.66 lac hectares or 96 per cent is irrigated.
Flood Plain/Beet Area
An area of 10138 hectares in Punjab is Beet area falling under Hoshiarpur district. Rains are scanty and there are no
definite sources of irrigation like canals, ponds etc. The groundwater table is normally very deep with tubewell bores
running to a depth of more than 650 feet. Like submountaneous area, the land is undulating and soil is very deep. Main
problem of bet area is the lack of water for irrigation and even for drinking purposes.
15
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table SPSP 2: Details of Agro-climatic zones in the State
1
2
3
4
S. No
Name of the Agro-climatic zone
Area in Ha.
Names of the
districts
1.
Semi Arid
263570
Amritsar
Sub Mountain Undulating Region
88562
Gurdaspur
Undulating Plain Region
137450
5
Major soil types
b) Area in
a)Type
Ha.
Sandy loam 222000
to loam
Sandy
to 88562
Sandy Loam
Clay Loam to
Sandy Loam,
Central Plain Region
6
Average rainfall in mm
(preceding 5 years average)
522.5
1400
87836
123616
Sandy Loam
to Clay Loam
Wheat,
Paddy,Basm
ati,
Sugarcane,
Berseem,
Vegetables
Sandy Loam
to Clay Loam
123616
Central Plane
241449
T.Tarn
Dry Sub humid
339800
Hoshiarpur
Central Plain
167000
Kapurthala
Central Plain
263000
Jalandhar
Sub Mountain Undulating Region
25000
Nawanshaher
4.
5.
6.
7.
Undulating Plain Region
15000
Sub Mountain Undulating Region
8.
135728
Ropar
b)Area in Ha.
183000
187000
48709
106467
1100
Wheat,
Paddy,Basm
ati,
Sugarcane,
101630
Paddy
Wheat
Wheat
Maize
Rice
Wheat,
Rice
Wheat,
Rice
Wheat
Rice
Sugarcane
Maize
Sunflower
Rapeseed &
Mustard
166290
180000
136771
60065
55272
187653
165321
162000
134000
72000
50000
9000
17000
15000
Wheat
Maize
61139
20301
Loamy Sand,
Loamy Clay
Sandy loam
Loamy sand
241449
650
159905
119929
900
Centrail
Alluvial Plain
Centrail
Alluvial Plain
sandy
to
sandy loam
167000
544
263000
703
25000
900
15000
135728
750
935
Clay Loam to
Sandy Loam,
Sandy Loam
to Clay Loam
Sandy loam
to
loamy
a)Name
Rice
Wheat
Wheat,
Maize,
Paddy,
Vegetables,
Horticulture
Fruit
Plantation
1100
49614
2.
3.
7
Major crops
1000
16
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
sand
36231
16823
Wheat
Maize
Rice
Fodder
Rice
Wheat
Rice
Wheat
Wheat
Paddy
Fodder
Vegetables
Wheat
Paddy
51362
6378
30153
21360
234000
240000
84000
85000
247677
240270
49807
8307
283000
262000
Undulating Plain Region
101713
S.A.S. Nagar
Sandy loam
to
loamy
sand
101713
815
Central Alluvial Plain
329000
Patiala
Clay
329000
571.8
Central Alluvial plain
117000
Clay
117000
403.4
Central Alluvial Plain
368000
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Ludhiana
deep loamy
alluvial
368000
680
South western plain region
312000
Sangrur
312000
344
South western plain region
140965
Barnala
140965
342
Wheat
Paddy
112000
99000
South Westren Plain region
205895
Moga
Sandy loam
to
loamy
sand
Sandy loam
to
loamy
sand, saline
and Sodic
Sandy Loam
Loamy Sand
97000
108895
277
Wheat
Paddy
194350
167615
Northen-Arid Zone
526300
Ferozepur
237.98
South western plain region
146875
Faridkot
Sandy Loam
Loamy Sand
84825
62650
395.8
Arid Irrigated Zone
263933
Muktsar
Sandy loam
263933
380
Wheat
Paddy
Cotton
Paddy
Cotton
Wheat
Cotton
Wheat
Paddy
Wheat
Cotton
Paddy
389000
235000
151000
90000
14000
111000
413702
Wheat
Cotton
Paddy
Rice
Wheat
Pulses
groundnut
Sunflower
Oilseeds
Sugarcane
Fruits
Vegetables
169000
100000
61000
2621000
3467000
29000
4000
15000
70000
99000
57000
110000
9.
10.
Rice
Fodder
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Arid
336725
Bathinda
19.
Western Area( Plain)
216643
Mansa
257000
375000
2680000
1714000
10138
20 districts
20.
Sub Mountainous undulating region or
Kandi region.
Undulating plain region.
Central plain region.
Western & Southern plain region.
Flood Plain/Bet Area.
Loamy sand
Sandy
Loamy
Sandyyto
Sandy Loam
168362
168363
216643
333.8
156.35
303052
227289
75763
17
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
2.1
Rainfall
a) Brief description about rainfall in the State, months during which rainfall is received in the State,
distribution of rainfall over the year with average rainfall per month, type of monsoon etc.
The mean annual rainfall is 705mm, which varies from 1200mm at Pathankot to less than 300 mm at Abohar,
representing wettest and driest stations, respectively. The major part of rain fall occurs between the months of July and
September, and is essential for growing Kharif crops and subsequent sowing of rabi crops. Hence the climate of the state
is dominantly, semiarid and monsoonic type. The soils moisture regimes are udic, ustic and aridic and the soil
temperature regime is mainly hyperthermic.
Table SPSP 3: Details of average rainfall and altitude recorded at the District headquarters
1
2
S.No.
Name of the District
1.
Amritsar
2.
Gurdaspur
3.
Taran Taran
4.
Hoshiarpur
5.
Kapurthala
6.
Jallandhar
7.
Nawanshahar
8.
Ropar
9.
S.A.S. Nagar
10.
Patiala
11.
Fatehgarh Sahib
12.
Ludhiana
13.
Sangrur
14.
Barnala
15.
Moga
16.
Ferozepur
17.
Faridkot
18.
Mukatsar
19.
Bathinda
20.
Mansa
STATE AVERAGE
3
Average rainfall in mm (preceding 5 years average)
432.2
917.6
391.7
576.2
428.10
552.5
630.2
671.8
376.7
571.8
403.4
375.7
344.9
287.2
197.4
171.0
462.9
449.7
357.9
155.0
438.0
18
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
b) A brief description of droughts and floods in the State in the last ten years.
Table SPSP 4: Details of drought and flood affected districts, blocks and villages in the State during
last 10 years * (MIS Table-M(SP)6)
1
2
3
4
5
Sl.No
Name of the
District
Particulars
Names of the
Block
Villages
Data
Available
Not
Flood
Drought
Data
Available
Data
Available
Not
Not
6
Periodicity
7
Not affected
No.of villages
Data Not
Available
Any other
(pl.specify)
Data
Not
Available
Name (s) of
villages
Data Not
Available
Data
Available
Not
Data Not
Available
No.of villages
Data Not
Available
Data
Available
Not
Data Not
Available
Name(s)
of villages
Data Not
Available
Data
Available
Not
Data Not
Available
Annual
Data Not
Available
19
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 3
3.0
Demography and land distribution – an overview
Growth in population during the last three census’ , per capita availability of land, sex ratio, population age
group in the State, literacy level, migration, workforce available in different sectors of the economy,
demography of SC,ST, BPL and landless families in the State in the last ten years, etc.
The Population during the last 3 Census' in the Year 1981, 1991 and 2001 was 1.68 Crores, 2.03 Crores and 2.44
Crores respectively marking a Growth of 45% in these 2 decades. The Average Size of Land Holding has been 4.03 Ha.
and the Sex Ratio in 2001 was 876. As per 2001 Census, there were 1.30 Crore Males and 1.14 Crore Females in the
state, out of which 0.32 Crores were Children in the Age Group (0-6). The Literacy rate has been 69.7% excluding the
Children in the Age Group (0-6). The migration of population is small proportions is either to big cities or foreign shores.
Out of total workforce of 91.27 Lakh, 20.65 Lakh are Cultivators, 14.90 Lakh are Agricultural Labourers and the remaining
are in other Main & marginal industries. There are 12.55 Lakh SC, 0 ST, 0.93 Lakh BPL and 2.09 Lakh Landless families in
the state.
3.1 Land reform measures – types of tenancies, distribution of ceiling surplus land, bhoodan land and
wastelands among landless, prevention of alienation of tribal land, restoration of alienated land among
tribals, women’s land rights, empowerment of PRIs, definition and proper categorization of common
property resources etc.
There are 20.65 Lakh Cultivators (Land Owners) and 14.90 Lakh Agricultural Labourers (Tenants or Workers) in the state.
At present, there is no Govt. policy to distribute ceiling surplus land, bhoodan land and wastelands among landless. There
are no tribals in the state. Women have equal land rights to men as per the relevant GOI Act. The PRIs are involved in
most of the Govt. schemes of Social, Agricultural & rural development. The ongoing watershed development programmes
of NWDPRA & IWDP are being implemented through PRIs only. The Common Property Resource (CPR) may be defined as
categorization of area under different land use/ land cover categories in different socio-cultural zones apart from
Agriculture, residential of industrial uses. There is 3.00 Lakh Ha. of Built-up land, 43.70 Lakh Ha. Agricultural Land, 1.54
Lakh Ha. of forests, 0.98 Lakh Ha. Wastelands, 0.96 Lakh Ha. under Water bodies and 0.19 lakh Ha. of wetlands in the
state.
20
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
3.2
Operational land holdings in the State under different categories and income
a)
Brief description about land holdings:
There are total 9.98 Lakh Operational Land Holdings in the state, out of which 0.72 Lakh (7.25%) are Large (>10 Ha.), 1.23 Lakh
(12.31%) are Marginal (<1 Ha.) and the remaining 8.03 Lakh (80.46%) are Small (1-10 ha.) holdings.
Table-SPSP 5: Details of District-wise land holding pattern in the State * (MIS Table-M(SP)9)
1
S.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
2
Names of
Districts
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
Taran Taran
Hoshiarpur
Kapurthala
5.
6.
Jallandhar
3
Type of Farmer
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
4
No. of
households
1901
16835
9184
5
No. of BPL
households
27920
2359
69415
41434
174751
287959
1984
43682
9184
0
30551
30551
6
Land holding (ha)
Irrigated
Rainfed
25943
23317
5893
144051
27719
164198
13438
0
4429
40473
6459
205355
26528
23317
4097
51361
54850
2000
52000
21000
0
75000
2584
23640
4790
0
0
0
3686
14750
18436
53942
17816
83050
4200
0
105066
40826
80121
3112
0
19184
67950
7800
0
94934
31014
21015
0
124059
158415
0
Total
25943
23317
5893
144051
32148
204671
19897
0
256716
26528
23317
4097
0
53942
37000
151000
12000
0
200000
40826
80121
3112
0
124059
158415
21
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
7.
8.
9.
Nawanshahar
Ropar
S.A.S. Nagar
Patiala
10.
Fatehgarh
Sahib
11.
Ludhiana
12.
Sangrur
13.
14.
Barnala
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
29930
9205
65131
5807
60150
8780
37144
55416
26341
127681
6890
18965
45325
16589
87769
4956
15623
32571
13548
66698
5005
8737
4460
60517
78719
1546
3799
12379
22473
40197
48483
14076
9819
164165
236543
41910
49957
9014
100881
10409
0
4884
4884
2758
2758
229353
15
25
34
0
1
4
5
74
10
10
16
29
3
4
55
9
14
21
7
1582
1582
44
8
0
0
0
0
0
48483
14076
9819
0
0
72378
132800
158400
28800
0
320000
94477
0
34975
34975
2
6
65131
5807
0
229353
16
29
39
0
84
10
19
33
0
62
9
16
27
0
52
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
48483
14076
9819
0
72378
132800
158400
28800
0
320000
94477
22
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Moga
15.
Ferozepur
16.
Faridkot
17.
Mukatsar
18.
Bathinda
19.
Mansa
20.
GRAND TOTAL
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large
ii) Small
iii) Marginal
iv) Landless
Sub-total
i) Large (2-10 ha)
ii) Small (1-2 ha)
iii) Marginal (<1 ha)
iv) Landless
Grand total
10784
1346
28445
1277
22539
39156
7916
6270
69809
123151
63717
8741
2996
0
124199
183576
11314
3976
0
0
198866
437527.3
11918
2112.55
0
75454
21753
4611
3132
0
451558
115285
6490
2003
0
29496
3526
13628
25148
11255
53557
44078
8262
7632
37552
97524
1388
14288
1786
0
123778
8
10
19
0
37
277249
11912
4639
3
32042
2000
1000
293800
54878.89
130305.8
2929.57
35042
188114
1641538.15
812019.77
92137.12
0
3840653
0
55656
110427
15264
0
181347
1896
1896
7800
7800
17462
686515
183064
133791
555608
1558978
0
0
0
3686
92960
96646
2
1
28445
1277
0
124199
183576
11314
3976
0
198866
437527.26
11918
2112.55
0
451557.81
115285
6490
2003
0
123778
8
12
20
0
40
309291
13912
5639
0
328842
54878.89
130305.77
2929.57
0
188114.23
1697194.15
922446.77
107401.12
0
4022000
23
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table SPSP 6: Share of Agriculture Sector to State Income/National Income at Current Prices and Total
Work Force in the State and India
1
Year
1999-2000
2000-01
2006-07
@
2
3
Percentage share of Agriculture
& allied (Primary) sector in
NSDP@ figure
State
All India
37.53
25.52
35.89
24.69
31.24
18.80
Percentage share of Agriculture in
Total Workforce
State
All India
38.95
60.00
NSDP: Net State Domestic Product
Table SPSP 7: Sectoral Composition of Net State Domestic Product (NSDP) in State.
Sector
Agriculture and allied
(Primary) Sectors
Industrial (secondary)
Sector
Service
(Tertiary)
Sector
Years
2005-06
30.72
1999-2000
37.53
2000-01
35.89
2006-07
31.24
22.75
22.98
24.33
24.78
39.72
41.13
44.95
43.98
24
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 4
4.0
Land Use Pattern
4.1
Brief description about land use planning and agriculture land in the state:
There is 3.00 Lakh Ha. of Built-up land, 43.70 Lakh Ha. Agricultural Land, 1.54 Lakh Ha. of forests, 0.98 Lakh Ha.
Wastelands, 0.96 Lakh Ha. under Water bodies and 0.19 lakh Ha. of wetlands in the state.
4.2 Mechanism in the State for land use conversion, establishment of Land Use Board in the State,
conversion of agricultural land to other uses in the last five years, brief description of other uses to which
agricultural land has been converted, extent to which area under wastelands has been reclaimed and the
uses to which the reclaimed land has been put, etc.
At present, the Revenue department gives the permission for land use conversion in the state. A State Land Use
Board was established under a GOI Scheme which has become redundant now due to scrapping of GOI scheme. The Net
Sown Area has reduced from 42.50 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2000-01 to 41.84 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2006-07. The agricultural
land is decreasing as it is being converted to residential & industrial land in the state. An area of 66157 Ha. of wasteland
has been reclaimed and put to productive agriculture use.
25
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 8: Land Use status in the State (average of preceding 5 years)*
(Area in 000 Ha.)
1
2
3
Districts
Geogra
phical
Area
Forest
Area
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
Taran Taran
Hoshiarpur
Kapurthala
Jallandhar
Nawanshahar
Ropar
S.A.S. Nagar
Patiala
267
356
241
340
163
266
119
144
111
329
10
37
5
108
2
6
16
37
18
13
4
Land
under
NonAgril
use
31
21
18
28
29
21
11
14
15
36
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Ludhiana
Sangrur
Barnala
Moga
Ferozepur
Faridkot
Mukatsar
Bathinda
Mansa
117
2
11
368
361
141
168
585
144
263
334
219
5036
10
5
2
2
12
2
2
8
3
300
52
38
13
22
38
17
14
32
14
475
Grand Total
5
6
Total rainfed area
b)cultiv
able
waste
a)cultiva
ted
7
Land under
miscellaneous tree
crops and
groves
Permanent
pastu-res
8
9
10
11
12
13
Curre
nt
fallow
Other
fallow
Net
sown
area
Net area
sown more
than once
Net irrigated
area
Gross
crop-ped
area
222
288
218
201
136
239
95
78
75
273
202
224
186
154
139
179
83
63
44
263
222
237
218
172
135
239
87
67
75
273
424
512
404
355
275
418
178
141
119
536
102
91
102
193
305
315
124
195
476
128
227
297
190
4184
275
309
116
176
397
126
222
258
170
3677
305
315
124
195
474
128
225
295
190
4078
580
624
240
371
873
254
449
555
360
7861
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
4
1
1
2
3
14
3
2
4
7
35
1
26
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
4.3
Irrigated areas
a) Brief description about irrigated area in the State – major sources of irrigation – effect of climate
change on irrigation – increase or decrease in irrigated area in the last five years – effect on crop
yields, productivity and change in cropping pattern.
Out of total 50.36 lakh Ha. of geographical area of Punjab, 41.84 Lakh Ha. (83%) is under cultivation. Out
of which, 40.78 Lakh Ha. (97.5%) is irrigated. However, only 11.93 Lakh Ha. (28.5%) of cultivated area is irrigated
by canals and the remaining 29.91 Lakh Ha. (71.5%) cultivated area depends upon rainfall and groundwater for
irrigation. The uneven & erratic rainfall / climate over the years has lead to over-exploitation of the ground water
resources of the state to the extent that 103 blocks out of total 141 blocks have been declared 'Over-exploited' and
the ground water table is depleting at an average rate of 50cm annually. The Net Irrigated Area has marginally
increased from 40.38 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2000-01 to 40.78 Lakh Ha. in the Year 2006-07. However, this change
has been affected due to a rise in the no. of Tubewells to 12.32 Lakhs, higher drawl from underground water
aquifers and the area irrigated by canals has in fact decreased during this period. From 2000-01 to 2006-07, there
has been an increase in yield of Rice from 3506 kg/Ha to 3868 Kg/ha and decrease in the Yield of Wheat from
4563 kg/Ha to 4210 Kg/ha. During this period, the area under Rice has increased from 26.12 Lakh Ha to 26.21
Lakh Ha. and the area under Wheat has increased from 34.08 Lakh Ha to 34.67 Lakh Ha.
27
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 9: Irrigation Status (Area in 000 Ha.)*
1
2
3
4
Districts
Gross#
cultivated
area
Net
cultivated
area
Gross@
irrigated
area
424
512
404
355
275
418
178
141
119
536
222
288
218
201
136
239
95
78
75
273
193
102
426.46
410.89
384.54
254.95
277.00
413.28
167.00
106.00
96.00
531.70
192.50
221.94
205.44
217.54
144.33
135.00
235.12
84.00
62.00
52.00
531.70
192.50
99.97
79.94
99.79
72.17
100.00
100.00
89.36
80.52
82.54
99.38
100.00
580
624
240
371
873
254
449
555
360
7861
305
315
124
195
476
128
227
297
190
604.80
616.60
125.00
194.34
891.80
253.00
437.57
328.84
361.00
7657.4
306.00
312.00
125.00
194.34
463.70
126.00
218.79
293.80
190.00
4078.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
94.39
96.99
96.92
90.07
89.34
96.94
97.70
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
Taran Taran
Hoshiarpur
Kapurthala
Jallandhar
Nawanshahar
Ropar
S.A.S. Nagar
Patiala
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Ludhiana
Sangrur
Barnala
Moga
Ferozepur
Faridkot
Mukatsar
Bathinda
Mansa
Grand Total
4184
5
6
Net irrigated Net irrigated
area
%
7
Rainfed
Area
1.00
51.36
94.93
10.00
16.00
11.00
23.00
% of net
cultivated area
0.45
19.98
0.00
47.47
0.00
0.00
10.64
20.78
17.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.04
0.00
0.00
43.49
35.05
285.58
0.00
0.00
10.66
0.00
7.19
28
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 10: Source-wise Area Irrigated (Area in 000Ha.)*
1
2
3
4
5
6
Canal
(Area)
Tanks
Open wells
Bore wells
Lift irrigation
Districts
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
Taran Taran
Hoshiarpur
Kapurthala
Jallandhar
Nawanshaha
r
Ropar
S.A.S. Nagar
Patiala
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Ludhiana
Sangrur
Barnala
Moga
Ferozepur
Faridkot
Mukatsar
Bathinda
Mansa
Grand Total
54
56
115
21
0.5
4
1.0
No
Area
No
Area
45
60.00
137
0.03
0
0.00
524
0.01
4
0
6
11
10
19
27
3
161
107
200
215
95
1109
45
60.00
661
0.04
No
Area
67970
51338
87292
20000
20000
40000
20885
168
213
103
141
135
233
83
10000
80000
7000
3000
74
49
265
91
294000
92123
10000
83183
30000
5000
5000
29705
32689
1246000
296
293
97
192
314
17
24
81
95
2964
7
Others (Pl.
specify)
No
Area
No
Area
15
250.00
10
145.00
8
1438.00
8
Total
No
Area
67970
222
269
218
165
135
237
84
2000.00
5
0.02
20891
78
50
271
102
294000
92123
83
23
1688.00
15
2145.02
29705
32689
537461
29
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
306
312
124
195
475
124
224
296
190
4077
4.4. Common Property Resources (CPR):
Brief description about Common Property Resources in the State, laws regarding common property
resources, access of landless to the CPRs, management and maintenance of CPRs, brief description of CPRs
which have become inoperable due to non-maintenance, state assistance, if any, for development and
maintenance of CPRs etc.
The Common Property Resource (CPR) may be defined as categorization of area under different land use/ land cover
categories in different socio-cultural zones apart from Agriculture, residential of industrial uses. There is 3.00 Lakh Ha. of
Built-up land, 43.70 Lakh Ha. Agricultural Land, 1.54 Lakh Ha. of forests, 0.98 Lakh Ha. Wastelands, 0.96 Lakh Ha. under
Water bodies and 0.19 lakh Ha. of wetlands in the state. The CPR is either under control of the Revenue department,
Panchayats or Municipal Corporations etc. and the Revenue Department can transfer the same to other uses. The
landless can work as labourers under different schemes on the CPR. Most of the CPR, barring Mountainous land, is
operable and is put into diverse uses as described in the table below.
30
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 11: Details of Common Property Resources in the State *(MIS Table-M(SP)10)
1
2
3
S.
No.
Names of
Districts
CPR
Particulars
1.
2.
3.
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
Taran Taran
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
4
Total Area (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of
Govt.
Any other
Pvt.
(Specify
PRI
(Pl.
persons
deptt.)
Specify)
191
177
176
5
Area available for treatment (ha)
Pvt.
persons
191
Govt.
(specify
deptt.)
177
PRI
Any other
(Pl.
Specify)
20
9632
438
22598
150
205
8400
4000
2600
425
2932
98
302
100
15
33140
150
1446
32
302
2630
98
2630
98
554
5176
504
153
5176
504
31
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Permanent markets
20
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
4.
Hoshiarpur
200
Wasteland/ degraded land
9438
9438
60
25
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
54000
22400
Village Ponds/ Tanks
11600
665
21000
16000
9600
355
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
5.
Kapurthala
Wasteland/ degraded land
1650
Pastures
Orchards
100
Village Woodlot
Forest
200
Village Ponds/ Tanks
400
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
32
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
6.
Jallandhar
Wasteland/ degraded land
3100
Pastures
Orchards
100
Village Woodlot
Forest
700
Village Ponds/ Tanks
600
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
7.
Nawanshahar
Wasteland/ degraded land
8000
15000
5000
Pastures
Orchards
900
100
Village Woodlot
Forest
12000
Village Ponds/ Tanks
405
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
8.
Ropar
Wasteland/ degraded land
2000
4000
4000
2000
4000
4000
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
33
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Forest
7000
13000
6000
2000
1000
1000
5000
1000
2000
5000
1000
2000
5000
10000
3000
2000
3000
2000
5000
3000
4000
3000
8000
9000
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
9.
S.A.S. Nagar
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
10.
Patiala
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
34
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
11.
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Wasteland/ degraded land
10000
8000
3000
8000
4000
3000
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
12.
Ludhiana
3164
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
1624
Village Woodlot
3215
Forest
10200
Village Ponds/ Tanks
2940
Community Buildings
791
2898
Weekly Markets
517
Permanent markets
132
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
1146
1
35
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
13.
Sangrur
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
2381
28
Village Woodlot
14.
Barnala
Forest
5000
Village Ponds/ Tanks
1300
Community Buildings
340
Weekly Markets
70
Permanent markets
1700
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
460
41130
Wasteland/ degraded land
1640
Pastures
4500
Orchards
Village Woodlot
950
Forest
1701
Village Ponds/ Tanks
2910
Community Buildings
15.
Moga
454
441
1900
Weekly Markets
400
Permanent markets
109
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
60
5236
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
55
Village Woodlot
36
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Forest
2575
Village Ponds/ Tanks
563
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
16.
Ferozepur
8200
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
2680
Village Woodlot
Forest
233.22
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
19279
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
17.
Faridkot
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
500
Village Woodlot
Forest
200
Village Ponds/ Tanks
235
Community Buildings
260
Weekly Markets
37
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Permanent markets
10
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
18.
Mukatsar
639
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
6162
Village Woodlot
Forest
1722
Village Ponds/ Tanks
1022
Community Buildings
236
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
4
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
19.
Bathinda
Wasteland/ degraded land
520
6052
6052
1630
1630
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
6283
Village Ponds/ Tanks
6283
540
540
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
20.
Mansa
Wasteland/ degraded land
9
24
3032
3032
38
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
869
869
3125
3125
368
368
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
GRAND TOTAL
Wasteland/ degraded
land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of
worship
Others (Pl. specify)
52727
41249
32000
10532
28002
29245
18100
0
0
4598
0
98
0
98
0
0
18185
223
0
0
2499
25
0
0
0
4165
0
0
0
0
0
0
81475
121812
20600
0
25000
34584
12600
0
1713
8092
3773
908
0
504
355
908
20511
27889
496
0
0
0
0
0
0
987
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2157
0
9
0
0
0
0
24
1871
1159
200
0
0
0
0
0
46367
0
0
0
0
0
0
39
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 5
5.0
Trends in agriculture and food productivity
Brief description about agriculture and food productivity, major crops by cropping seasons, total
food-grain production in the State, per capita availability of food-grains, comparison with national
average, crops exported from the State and crops imported in the State, share of agriculture sector
in State income/national income at current prices, total agriculture workforce in the State compared
to national, changes in cropping patterns during the last five years, etc.
Rice & Maize are the major Kharif crops and Wheat is major Rabi crop in Punjab. Other major crops include Pulses,
Oilseeds, cotton, sugarcane, Vegetables & fruits. In the Year 2006-07, the yield of Rice was 3868 Kg/ha and that
of Wheat was 4210 Kg/ha. The area under Rice was 26.21 Lakh Ha. and that under Wheat was 34.67 Lakh Ha.
The Production of Rice has been 101.38 Lakh Metric tons while that of Wheat has been 145.96 Lakh Metric tons in
the Year 2006-07. The Per capita availability of food-grains is 1015.39 Kg as compared to National average figure
of 156.64 kg (taking into account Rice & Wheat only). The State contributes 31.2% of rice and 75.3% of Wheat to
the Central Pool. Rice worth 754.58 Crores was exported from the State in 2006-07. The share of agriculture &
allied (Primary) sector in State income at current prices has been 31.24% as compared to 18.81% of the National
figures. The Percentage share of Agriculture in Total Workforce in Punjab was 38.95% as per 2000-01 Census as
compared to around 60% of National figure. From 2000-01 to 2006-07, the area under Rice has increased from
26.12 Lakh Ha to 26.21 Lakh Ha. and the area under Wheat has increased from 34.08 Lakh Ha to 34.67 Lakh Ha.
40
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 12: Crops production and productivity as per Agricultural Statistics, 2008
(MIS Table-M(PO)C1, C2 & C3 pre-project status)
1.
2
3
Sl.
No.
Names of the
Districts
Name of
crops
Area
(ha)
Irri
1.
2.
3.
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
Rice
123000
4
5
6
Kharif
Rabi
Zaid
Average Yield (Qtl)
Total Production (Qtl)
per ha.
Rf.
Irri
33.98
Rf.
Irri
Rf.
Area
(ha)
Irri
44.04
810000
Wheat
1700
00
37.59
639030
0
Paddy
170000
Maize
2000
171000
28.13
Jallandhar
43
38
Ropar
1.9
11.4
-
1.00
-
1.5
12.0
-
23.00
7822
5
18
140805
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
55272
28
1547616
37.53
4348
-
4355000
1110
00
-
32.5
16
13
2400
30000
40
41.20
-
4643
-
-
1620
00
46.2
748440
0
68
17
5000
0
45
2090000
480000
470000
WHEAT
MAIZE
425
-
114000
Wheat
8.
17
-
Rice
10
9
250
Rf.
-
RICE
49
Irri
7000
-
495540
Nawanshahar Rice
Maize
Sugarcan
e
Rf.
--
15
Wheat
7.
Irri
3.32
8.19,00
0
-
1.85
134000
Rf.
2000
539
33036
Rice
Irri
Average Yield Total production
per ha (qtl)
(qtl)
41880
Wheat
5.
Rf.
Area
(ha)
4782100
Maize
Wheat
Kapurthala
Irri
1.84
Oil Seed
5.
Rf.
Wheat
Taran Taran Paddy
Wheat
Hoshiarpur
Irri
Total
production (qtl)
418000
Pulses
4.
Rf.
Average
Yield per ha
(qtl)
300000
0
600000
0
1200000
41
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
RICE
9.
S.A.S. Nagar
MAIZE
RICE
10
Patiala
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Ludhiana
Sangrur
Barnala
Moga
16.
Ferozepur
17.
Faridkot
33000
37
1220000
WHEAT
---
----
---
---
--
---
17.0
84.0
---
---
----
---
---
--
---
35
Paddy
247000
46.33
11440
--
--
--
--
---
--
---
--
Wheat
--
--
2580
00
283
12460
--
--
--
--
--
132727
00
535000
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
262
99
158945
Cotton
4794
Wheat
-
Paddy
Cotton
wheat
Barley
Gram
235
151
-
70
47.72
42.30
7.12
-
18340000
4660000
6723373
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
41.43
689444
9
-
-
-
-
-
200
7.5
-
1500
-
-
-
389
5
13
40.79
1587.0
110.15
-
-
95000
43.57
21000
6.87
85000 bales
3) Moong
700
10.15
7000
Cotton
2000
Desi
Cotton
19.
Bathinda
-
-
2)Cotton
Mukatsar
-
1664
12
1)Paddy
97000
105000
47.07
-
4140000
paddy
4234 kg
per ha
758 kg
per ha
648 kg
per ha
46.90
112
948.0
14.36
48.28
33813
33.57
10.23
17.0
1.3
4) wheat
18.
180000
0
23.4
--
80000
1030000
45
40
36
---
WHEAT
RICE
WHEAT
RICE
Paddy
2000
29000
4000
0
1180
00
47.32
558000
0
3030
52
40
221.00
4.02
lac meter
ton
4.68 lac
bales
8000
bales
Wheat
Cotton
227289
20
45.45
Paddy
75763
60
45.46
42
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
20.
Cotton
Mansa
100318
61096
438 Bales
7.45
Peddy
252 MT
169
41.29
GRAND TOTAL
Wheat
Rice
2621000
38.68
101380000
223
Maize
154000
31.23
4810000
Wheat
3467
000
1900
0
Barley
Rapeseed
&
Mustard
Sunflowe
r
Sugarcan
e
Potato
Cotton
43.4
42.10
145960
000
33.94
640000
4100
0
11.1
9
1530
0
9900
0
7560
0
6000
00
16.3
9
60.8
3
170.
30
6020000
7.63
45780
460000
251000
1352500
0
43
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 13: A. comparative average yield of major crops of the State and India during Triennia
1972-73 to 1974 -75 and 1992-93 to 1994-95 (in Kg/Ha.)
1
Major Crop/crop
group
Rice
Maize
Wheat
Barley
Rapeseed & Mustard
Sunflower
Sugarcane
Potato
Cotton
2
Period I: 1970-71
State
India
1765
1555
2238
1022
4117
12752
399
3
Period II: 1990-91
State
India
3229
1786
3715
2754
1003
1531
5941
19863
481
4
Period III: Post 2000-01
State
India
3506
2102
2793
1938
4563
2619
3393
1938
1218
1154
6425
6691
19563
17058
437
362
5.1 Give a brief description of types, area covered, production/productivity, marketing facilities and
income per ha. from cash crops grown in the State
Apart from foodgrains, Punjab produces a number of Cash crops like Pulses, groundnut, Sunflower, Oilseeds,
Sugarcane, Fruits & Vegetables covering area of 0.29 Lakh Ha, 0.04 Lakh Ha, 0.15 Lakh Ha, 0.70 Lakh Ha, 0.99
Lakh Ha, 0.57 Lakh Ha & 1.10 Lakh Ha respectively. The Production of these Cash crops in 2006-07 has been
Pulses- 0.24 Lakh Metric tons, groundnut- 0.04 Lakh Metric tons, Sunflower- 0.25 Lakh Metric tons, Oilseeds- 0.78
Lakh Metric tons, Sugarcane- 6.02 Lakh Metric tons and Fruits- 8.31 Lakh Metric tons. Major Fruit crops include
Kinnow, Guava, Mangoes, Ber & Pear. Major vegetables include Potato & Onion. There are 145 regulated markets
attached with 294 sub-yards in the state for marketing. The Gross Income Per Hectare of Cash crops varies from
Rs. 1.25 Lakhs to 2.00 Lakhs.
44
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 6
6.0 Implementation of watershed programmes in the State at present
a) Brief description about administrative structure for implementing watershed programmes in the
State.
At present, National Watershed Development programme for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA) & Flood Prone RiverGhaggar-River valley project (FPR-RVP) schemes of the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and the Integrated Wasteland
Development Programme (IWDP) of the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) are being implemented in 12 districts of
the state. The present Administrative set-up in NWDPRA & FPR-RVP schemes involves the MoA at the GOI level, State
level Steering Committee (SLSC) under the chairmanship of Financial Commissioner Development and the State Level
Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as the Nodal Office at the State level and
the district level officers of the department as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The present Administrative set-up in
IWDP scheme involves the MoRD at the GOI level, State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Joint Development
Commissioner at the State Level, District level Additional Deputy Commissioners as Nodal officers and the district level
officers of the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The new Common
Watershed Development guidelines of GOI shall be applicable to all new watershed development programmes in the
state.
b) Area covered under watershed programmes in the State
Under NWDPRA & FPR-RVP, 97 Micro-watersheds have already been taken up covering an area of 1.30 lakh Ha.
Under IWDP, 76 Micro-watersheds have been started covering an area of 0.66 Lakh Ha. These Projects have been
formulated based on the local problems of soil & water in the project area. 3 more IWDP projects are being proposed
covering 0.35 Lakh Ha. in 3 districts.
45
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 14: Status of District-wise area covered under the watershed programme (ha) * (MIS
Table-M(SP)2)
1
2
S.
No.
Names of Districts
3
4
Total microwatersheds in the
District
5
Micro-watersheds covered so far
Dept. of Land Resources
Other Ministries/ Depts.
Pre-IWMP projects (DPAP +DDP
Any other watershed project
+IWDP)
No.
Area
(ha.)
No.
16
11
38
75810
38000
175353
3
1
2
Total watersheds
covered
Net watersheds to be
covered
Area (ha.)
No.
Area (ha.)
No.
Area
(ha.)
No.
Area (ha.)
13678
3000
9285
12
2
15
60343
3463
23929
74021
6463
33214
0
1
8
21
0
1789
31537
142139
0
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
Taran Taran
Hoshiarpur
Kapurthala
15
3
17
0
6.
Jallandhar
0
0
0
0
7.
8.
Nawanshahar
9.
10.
Ropar
12
29
50000
86510
2
1
8632
5252
3
19
12454
25000
5
20
21086
30252
7
9
28914
56258
S.A.S. Nagar
11
73259
1
4245
4
15000
5
19245
6
54014
3
13000
1
5000
1
5000
2
8000
0
0
0
0
12
Patiala
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Ludhiana
0
0
0
0
13
Sangrur
1
1
3700
0
0
14
Barnala
0
0
0
0
15
Moga
0
0
0
0
16
Ferozepur
10
8200
1
1525
1
1525
9
6675
17
Faridkot
1
3040
1
3040
1
3040
0
0
18
Mukatsar
1
5787
1
5787
1
5787
0
0
19
Bathinda
0
0
0
0
20
Mansa
GRAND TOTAL
1
3349
0
0
71
206682
63
329326
11
3700
1
3700
1
3349
1
3349
134
536008
16
66157
55
140189
46
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 15: Details regarding the watershed projects sanctioned by DoLR in the State:
1
2
3
S.No.
Item
Total
1
Area sanctioned in ha. (as per column 4 of DoLR
area in ha. Table SSP 14)
Names of the districts covered
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
No.of Blocks covered
No.of watershed projects sanctioned by DoLR
No. of projects completed out of those taken at
Row (4)
No.of projects foreclosed of Row (4)
No.of on-going projects of Row (4)
Area already treated by completed projects of
Row (5)
Area for treatment by on-going projects of Row
(5)
Total area treated and under treatment (8)+ (9)
Area yet to be treated and proposed to be
treated by DoLR
(column 1-column 10)
4
Pre-IWMP scheme details
DPAP
DDP
IWDP
66157
Hoshiarpur,
Sangrur,Gurdaspur,
Taran Taran,
Ferozepur,
Faridkot, Mansa,
Amritsar, Muktsar
16
none
nil
16
none
66157
52487
38000
47
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 16: Details of the watershed projects implemented in the State with the financial assistance
other than DoLR
1
2
3
S.N
o
Item
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Area sanctioned in ha. (as per column
4 of Table 14)
Names of the districts covered
No.of Blocks covered
No.of watershed projects sanctioned
other than DoLR
No.of projects completed out of those
taken at Row (4)
No. of projects foreclosed of Row (4)
No.of on-going projects of Row (4)
Area already treated by completed
projects of Row (5)
Area for treatment by on-going
projects of Row (5)
Total area treated and under
treatment (8)+ (9)
Area yet to be treated and proposed
to be treated by other than DoLR
resources
(column 1-column 10)
4
Watershed schemes of other Ministries
Ministry of Agriculture
GoI
Ministry of
E & F, GoI
Planning
Commission
NABA
RD
State
Govt.
EA
P
#Others
(Pl.
Specify)
140189
Mohali, Ropar,
Nawanshaher,
Hoshiarpur, Gurdaspur
55
37
18
70019
26881
96900
397811
48
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
6.1
Details of pending utilization certificates and unspent balance.
Kindly refer Table- SPSP 17 below.
Table- SPSP 17
1
S.
No.
1.
2.
2
District
Amritsar
Gurdaspur
3.
Taran Taran
4.
Hoshiarpur
: Details of pending UCs (MIS Table-M(FM)5)
3
Project
Nil
IWDP-I
IWDPII
IWDPIII
IWDP
4
5
6
7
Instalment
no.
Financial
year of
release of
fund
Amount
released
(Rs. in
lakh)
Amount
utilized
(Rs.in
lakhs)
7 th
3rd
2008-09
2008-09
16.34
82.11
16.34
52.92
3rd
2008-09
81.94
40.76
st
04-05
27.00
23.67
nd
1
TDET
2
07-08
80.32
80.32
Harike
Wetlan
d
(Ministr
y of F
& E)
Mahilp
ur
-
07-08
54.43
54.43
rd
2008-09
(Oct./08)
101.05
41.65
Hazipu
r
2
nd
2008-09
(Oct./08)
54.14
14.25
3
8
9
Submission of
UC
Date of submission
of UC
Due
date
31-306
31-308
31-308
Amount
(Rs. In
lakhs)
23.67
80.32
54.43
Date
21-206
31-309
311208s
Amount
(Rs. In
lakhs)
23.67
10
11
Reasons for
not
submitting/
delayed
submission of
UC
80.32
Submitted in
time
--do--
54.43
--do--
UC to be
submitted
along with the
th
case for 4
Installment
UC to be
submitted
along with the
case for 3rd
Installment
Pending UCs
Period
Amount
(Rs. in
lakhs)
-
-
-
-
200809&
2009-10
101.05
200809&
2009-10
54.14
49
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11
12
13
Kapurthala
Jallandhar
Nawanshah
ar
Ropar
S.A.S.
Nagar
Patiala
Fatehgarh
Sahib
Ludhiana
Nil
Nil
Iwdp
3
2009-10
78.81
-
Instalment
sanctioned in
August 2009
2nd
2006-07
99.90
71.52
Funds could
not be utilized
because of
elections
1
05-06
11.62
-
-
2
1st
08-09
2006-07
12.58
(GOI)
1.14
(state
share)
24.54
27.36
4.76
15.70
-
-
Ist
2nd
2001-02
2005-06
total
52.08
49.14
101.22
41.20
44.38
85.58
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
IWDP
Le
Sangrur
Hragag
a
14
15
16
Barnala
Moga
Nil
IWDP
Ferozepur
17
Faridkot
18
I.W.D.
P.
IWDP
Mukatsar
19
20
Bathinda
Mansa
7-82007
-
7.58
-
-
-
1
61.05
08-09
6.14
1 No.
-
10.88
4.76
15.64
Nil
Nil
50
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 18: Details of Unspent balance (MIS Table-M(FM)8)
1
S.
No.
1.
2.
2
3
District
Project
Amritsar
nil
IWDP-I
IWDP-II
IWDP-III
IWDP
Mahilpur
Hazipur
nil
nil
Balachaur
Saroya
Budhkirao
Iwdp
Iwdp
nil
nil
Lehragaga
nil
nil
IWDP
IWDP
IWDP
nil
IWDP
Gurdaspur
3.
4.
Taran Taran
5.
6.
7.
Kapurthala
Jallandhar
8.
9.
10.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Ropar
S.A.S. Nagar
Patiala
Fatehgarh Sahib
Ludhiana
Sangrur
Barnala
Moga
Ferozepur
Faridkot
Mukatsar
Bathinda
Mansa
Hoshiarpur
Nawanshahar
4
5
6
7
8
Last released
Installment
no.
Financial year of
release of last
fund
Total Amount
released (Rs. in
lakh)
Total Amount
utilized
(Rs.in lakhs)
Unutilised funds
(Rs. In lakhs)
4th
rd
3
rd
3
st
1
rd
3
nd
2
2006-07
2007-08
2007-08
2004-05
2008-09
2008-09
188.52
217.50
217.50
27.00
277.36
85.53
172.71
189.66
176.32
23.67
208.92
47.56
15.81
27.84
41.18
3.33
68.44
37.97
2
2
4
1
1
2006-07
2007-08
2007-08
2006-07
2005-06
141.49
97.78
182.75
38.20
45.00
141.49
97.78
139.60
29.54
45.00
0.00
0.00
43.15
8.66
0.00
2nd
2007-08
99.90
73.33
26.57
1
1
2
2008-09
2008-09
2006-07
38.26
25.08
101.22
15.76
18.72
76.03
22.50
6.36
25.19
1
2003-04
20.63
1803.72
20.63
1476.72
0.00
327.00
51
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 7
7.0 Strategy for implementation of Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP)
Briefly describe the following:
a)
Prioritization of available area based on the criteria as per the Operational Guidelines of DoLR
The area has been prioritized for treatment after following the DoLR Guidelines. Area & treatment has been
suggested keeping in view the local problems of the project area.
b)
List of watershed projects, along with area coverage, selected for treatment for the next 18
years; listing of these watershed projects and area coverage year-wise for next 18 years
Details given in Table-SPSP 19 below.
52
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 19: Plan-wise phasing of physical (area in ha) & financial (Rs. in Crore) targets of IWMP
for next 18 years*:
District
S.No
Remaining period of
XI Plan
(2009-10 to 2011-12)
Phy.
Fin.
XII Plan
(2012-13 to
2016-17)
Phy.
Fin.
1
Gurdaspur
1789
2.15
2
Hoshiarpur
19501
23.40
16500
19.80
3
Ropar
14120
16.94
9000
12.08
4
Amritsar
3000
3.60
5
XIII Plan
(2017-18 to
2021-22)
Phy.
19600
Fin.
23.40
XIV Plan
(2022-23 to
2026-27)
Phy.
20500
Fin.
24.60
2000
2.40
Patiala
3000
3.60
2000
2.40
6
Sangrur
4000
4.80
2000
2.40
7
Jalandhar
GRAND TOTAL
35410
42.49
2000
2.40
2000
2.40
2000
2.40
30500
37.88
30600
36.6
26500
31.8
Total for 18 years
Phy.
Fin.
1789
2.15
76101
91.2
23120
29.02
5000
6.00
5000
6.00
6000
7.20
6000
7.20
123010
148.77
53
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 20: Year-wise phasing of physical (area in ’000 ha) & financial (Rs. in lakh) targets of
IWMP for remaining period of XI Plan *:
1
S.
No
2
2009-10
Phy.
District
No. of
projects
H&D
O
Ropar
0
2
Gurdasp
ur
1
447
3
Hoshiar
pur
6
4875
7
8
8
No. of
projects
O
500
0
1
Grand Total
Fin.
Area
H&D
5322
H&D- Hilly & Difficult area;
3
Remaining period of XI Plan
2010-11
2011-12
Fin.
Phy.
Phy.
H&D
6
5.85
500
0
11.8
5
0
O
H&D
O
50
00
8
1
895
6
9751
7
1064
6
8
No. of
projects
Area
H&D
6
11.7
50
00
17.7
O
H&D
447
6
4875
5322
Fin.
Phy.
No. of
projects
O
41
20
1
8
Fin.
Area
8
7
Total
H&D
41
20
O
H&D
8
14120
1694
1
1789
214.
93
6
19501
2340
35410
4248
.93
4.94
5.85
10.79
Area
7
8
O
0
O- Others
54
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
1
Table-SPSP 21: Details of district wise and category-wise area proposed to be taken up under IWMP
during next 3 years i.e upto 11th Five Year Plan.
(Area in 000 Ha.)
7
2
3
4
5
6
S. No.
District
Year
1.
Ropar
2.
Gurdasp
ur
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Sub-total
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Sub-total
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Sub-total
2009-10
Total area
available
for
treatment
5000
5000
4120
14120
447
895
447
1789
4875
9751
4875
19501
10322
2010-11
15646
2011-12
Sub-total
3.
Hoshiar
pur
GRAND TOTAL
Total area
proposed to take
up under IWMP in
the next 3 years
5000
5000
4120
14120
447
895
447
1789
4875
9751
4875
19501
10322
Terrain of the proposed area
Hilly
Desert
Others
(Pl.
specify)
5000
5000
4120
14120
447
895
447
1789
Land use type of proposed area
cultivated
rainfed area
Uncultivated
Wasteland
2100
2100
1935
6135
600
600
578
1778
634
945
1891
945
3781
1545
4875
9751
4875
19501
9875
0
447
880
1731
3462
1731
6924
3831
15646
14751
0
895
5562
2491
9442
9442
8995
0
447
3666
1523
35410
35410
33621
0
1789
13939
6193
55
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 21 (Conti.) : Details of district wise and category-wise area proposed to be taken up
under IWMP during next 3 years i.e upto 11th Five Year Plan.
7
8
Ownership pattern of the proposed area
No. of beneficiaries covered
Community
Forest
2541
6050
5529
1551
227
11
Private
4524
6983
7994
Others
(pl.
specify)
0
0
Total
area
DPAP
MF
SF
LF
Landless
14120
12
5
10
8
15
1700
1948
1789
20
8
11
4
25
783
1130
21
15
55
00
22
0
19501
9
Identified DPAP/ DDP Blocks
covered
Total
No. of
blocks
0
DDP
0
No. of
blocks
0
0
0
0
0
Area
Area
…………
………Nil
…………
……….
3624
11459
0
56
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
C) Briefly describe the convergence of IWMP with other Schemes in the State
No targets have been fixed for convergence. However, need-based convergence with NREGS may be carried out
during the course of the project implementation.
Table-SPSP 22: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes* (MIS Table-M(P)3)
1
2
S.
No.
Name
of the
District
nil
3
Names of
Departments
with
Schemes
converging
with IWMP
4
Funds to be
made
available to
IWMP due to
convergence
(Rs.)
Nil
nil
5
6
7
Was this fund
included in
Level at
Name of
Rs.12,000/15,000
which
activity/task/structure
per ha.
decision for
to be undertaken
convergence
with converged funds
was taken$
Yes
No
nil
nil
nil
nil
d) Public – Private Partnership
Briefly describe scope for Public – Private Partnership in watershed projects
No for Public – Private Partnership is carried out in the watershed projects. However, the treatment on private
lands of project area inhabitants is done on sharing basis depending upon the type of activity wherein nominal share is
taken from beneficiary.
57
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 23: Summary of Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects* (MIS Table-M(P)4)
1
2
3
S.
District
No.
nil
Name of Private
Sector Partner
Agency
nil
4
Type of agreement
signed
(MoU/contract
others pl.specify)
nil
5
6
7
Financial
contribution
Partnership
Interventions
Expected Outcomes
nil
nil
nil
7.1 Planning Process - Details of Scientific criteria/Inputs used in Planning (MIS Table-M(P)6)
Briefly describe about various scientific inputs used in planning watershed projects in the State.
Whether the desired criteria followed?
Scientific criteria/ inputs used
(A) Planning
Cluster approach
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been
arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute.
Baseline survey
Hydro-geological survey
Contour mapping
Participatory Net Planning (PNP)
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover
Ridge to Valley treatment
Online IT connectivity between
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP
Yes.
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
58
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
(2) DRDA and SLNA
(3) SLNA and DoLR
Availability of GIS layers
1. Cadastral map
2. Village boundaries
3. Drainage
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status)
5. Land use
6. Ground water status
7. Watershed boundaries
8. Activity
Crop simulation models#
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible
spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil
nutrient analysis
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#
Weather Stations
(B) Inputs
1. Bio-pesticides
2. Organic manures
3. Vermicompost
4. Bio-fertilizer
5. Water saving devices
6. Mechanized tools/ implements
7. Bio-fencing
8. Nutrient budgeting
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers
Any other (please specify)
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
Yes.
No.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
NA
59
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 8
8.0 Livelihood concerns:
(a) Brief description about the livelihoods in the State-traditional livelihoods-reasons for development
of traditional livelihoods-other raw materials and potential available in the State – livelihoods that
can be developed on the basis of these raw materials and potential-reasons for not developing
these livelihoods so far-factors necessary for developing these livelihoods-potential in rural areas
and potential in urban areas-backward-forward linkages available and yet to be created-facilities
for capacity building available and yet to be created-workforce available in the State by age groupper capita income in the State and comparison with national average – likely per capita income to
be generated through enhancement of livelihoods etc.
Given in Table- SPSP 24:(A) below.
60
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table- SPSP 24:(A) Details of livelihoods created for landless people*(MIS Table-M(PO)D2:(i))
1
S.
No.
1
2
District
Ropar
3
Name of activity
Gurdas
5
6
7
8
No. of beneficiaries
Pre-project
Expected change in
Funds required
Sources of funding (Rs.)
income
income from project
for the activity Project Benefi-
(Rs.)
intervention
(Rs.)
Nil
100%
10680000
Nil
100%
7565000
SC ST
Post Harvesting
35
Techniques
0
Small enterprises
2
4
55
0
Oth Wom Tot
ers
en
0
0
850
0
0
300
12
00
85
0
Fund
ciary
968000 100000
0
institution
NGO Others
0
0
0
0
0
0
900000
0
0
0
700000
0
0
0
0
656500 100000
0
0
Washing Powder 12
20
32
Nil
100%
120000
10000
10000
Sauces & Pickles
20
20
Nil
100%
225000
15000
10000
20
20
Nil
100%
150000
40000
10000
Nil
100%
9327000
Nil
100%
6313000
pur
Cutting &
Tailoring
3
al
Financial
Hoshiar
pur
Post Harvesting
67
Techniques
5
Small enterprises
like Bee Keeping
and Vermi culture
10
90
0
0
1350
0
0
459
20
75
15
49
842700
0
561300
0
61
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 25: (B) Details of other livelihoods created for farmers*(MIS Table- M(PO)D2:(ii))
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Funds
No. of beneficiaries
Name
Pre-project Expected change in
required for
of
income
income from project
the activity
activity SF MF LF Other Total
(Rs.)
intervention
(Rs.)
Bee
Keepin 10 15
25 17000/ Ha
25000/ Ha
30000
g
Gurdas
1
Mushro
pur
om
15
15 17500/ Ha
30000/ Ha
25000
Cultivat
ion
Mushro
om 40 20
12500/hact
25
625
20000 / hact
4125000
Cultivat 0 0
are
ion
Bee
20 10
Hoshiar
Keepin
25
325
-- do --- do -1863000
2
0 0
pur
g
Vermin 20 10
50
350
-- do --- do -2214000
Culture 0 0
Dairy / 15
75 25
250
-- do --- do -3760000
Poltary 0
S.
District
No.
8
Sources of funding (Rs.)
Projec Benefi- Financial
NGO Others
t Fund ciary institution
20000 10000
15000 10000
32750
850000
00
14630
400000
00
16140
600000
00
30100
750000
00
62
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 9
9.0 Institutional arrangements
Briefly describe the Institutional arrangements for implementation of IWMP in the State at various levels
At present, National Watershed Development programme for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA) & Flood Prone RiverGhaggar-River valley project (FPR-RVP) schemes of the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) and the Integrated Wasteland
Development Programme (IWDP) of the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) are being implemented in 12 districts of
the state. The present Administrative set-up in NWDPRA & FPR-RVP schemes involves the MoA at the GOI level, State
level Steering Committee (SLSC) under the chairmanship of Financial Commissioner Development and the State Level
Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as the Nodal Office at the State level and
the district level officers of the department as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The present Administrative set-up in
IWDP scheme involves the MoRD at the GOI level, State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) followed by the Joint Development
Commissioner at the State Level, District level Additional Deputy Commissioners as Nodal officers and the district level
officers of the Department of Soil & Water Conservation as Project Implementing Agencies (PIA). The new Common
Watershed Development guidelines of GOI shall be applicable to all new watershed development programmes in the
state.
9.1 SLNA
Briefly describe organizational structure of SLNA (total no. of persons working, no. of permanent
employees, no. of persons on contract basis, no. of persons paid from DoLR grants under IWMP, other
sources of funds)
A dedicated State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) (Department ) is constituted by the State Government vide notification
no.7647 dt. 27-10-2008 as per common guidelines of Watershed Development Programme as per the following:
63
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
 Financial Commissioner, Rural Dev. & Panchayats
Chairman
 Financial Commissioner Development or Representative
Member
 Rep. of GOI Water Resources Deptt., Rural Dev. Ministry
Member
 Dr. A.K. Sikka, Technical Expert (WD), NRAA
Member
 Rep. of GOI Ministry of Agriculture
Member
 Rep. of NABARD
Member
 Director, Rural Development & Panchayats, Punjab
Member
 Joint Development Commissioner (IRDP), Punjab
Member
 Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Punjab
Member
 Chief Conservator of Soils, Punjab
Member
 Director, Animal Husbandry Deptt., Punjab
Member
 Director, Water Resources, Punjab
Member
 Head, Deptt. of Soil & Water Engg., PAU, Ludhiana
Member
 Rep. of NGO SPACE
Member
 Chief Executive Officer/ SLNA
Member Secretary
The main functions of the SLNA will be to:
64
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
a. Prepare a perspective and strategic plan of watershed development for the state on the basis of plans prepared at the
block and district level and indicate implementation strategy and expected outputs/outcomes, financial outlays and
approach the Nodal Agency at the central level in the Department for appraisal and clearance.
b. Establish and maintain a state level data cell from the funds sanctioned to the States, and connect it online with the
National Level
Data Centre.
c. Provide technical support to District Watershed Development Units (DWDU) throughout the state.
d. Approve a list of independent institutions for capacity building of various stakeholders within the state and work out the
overall capacity building strategy in consultation with NRAA/Nodal Ministry.
e. Approve Project Implementing Agencies identified/selected by DWDU/ District Level Committee by adopting
appropriate objective selection criteria and transparent systems.
f. Establish monitoring, evaluation and learning systems at various levels (Internal and external/ independent systems).
g. Ensure regular and quality on-line monitoring of watershed projects in the state in association with Nodal Agency at the
central level and securing feedback by developing partnerships with independent and capable agencies.
h. Constitute a panel of Independent Institutional Evaluators for all watershed projects within the state, get this panel duly
approved by the concerned Nodal Agencies at the central level and ensure that quality evaluations take place on a regular
basis.
i. Prepare State Specific Process Guidelines, Technology Manuals etc in coordination with the Nodal Ministry/ NRAA and
operationalise the same.
The Funding support for the State Level Nodal Agency and the state level data cell will come primarily from the budget of
the Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development after suitable review of the existing staff and
infrastructure already available and actual requirement. It may also receive support from other Institutes and Agencies
both national and international, corporate entities, and such other organisations which seek to support programmes on
watershed mode. Each State Level Nodal Agency and state level data cell will be provided with an initial capital grant to
65
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
meet establishment costs and a recurring grant per annum to meet its annual expenses. The actual amount would depend
upon the level of staff and infrastructure already available and the actual requirement. Till such time, SLNA is set up, the
existing arrangement regarding sanctioning of project and flow of fund will be continued. However, all out efforts should be
made by the States to set up SLNAs within a period of 6 months.
Table-SPSP 26: Details of SLNA (MIS Table-M(IS)1)
1
2
3
4
S.
No.
Date of Notification
Type of SLNA#
Date of MoU
with DoLR
1.
27/10/2008
5
Total no. of
members of
SLNA
15
Table-SPSP 27: Details of SLNA (MIS Table-M(IS)1) (Contd..)
6
Chairperson
7
CEO
Name
Designation#
Name
Designation
Date of
Appointment
Sh. J. S.
Sandhu
Financial
Commission
Rural
Development
& Panchyats
Dr. S.
Krana
Raju
Joint
Development
Commissioner
27-10-08
Nature of
appointment
Deputation
$
Tenure
(No. of
years)
Contact Ph. No./
Fax/ E-mail
NA
0172-2700920
66
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 28: Details of functionaries in the SLNAs* (MIS Table-M(IS)2)
1
2
3
4
Monthly
Details of the persons engaged in the SLNA funded by DoLR
Total no. emoluments
S. of persons
of all the
Contact Subject
Nature
Date
of
Tenure
N working in
persons
Ph. No./
Names &
Monthly
of
of
Qualifi
Rol
Experience
o. the SLNA
working in Designation remuneration Appoint appoint- (No. of
Expertis -cation
e
Fax/
ment
years)
$
for IWMP
the SLNA
ment
e
E-mail
for IWMP
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Table-SPSP 29 : Details of State Level Data Cell (SLDC) functionaries*# (MIS Table-M(IS)3)
1
S.
No.
1
2
3
Monthly
Total no. emoluments
of persons
of all the
working in
persons
Names &
the SLDC
working in Designation
for IWMP
the SLDC
for IWMP
4
Details of the persons engaged in the SLDC to be funded by DoLR
Monthly re
muneration
Date of
Appoint
ment
Nature of
appointment $
Tenur
e
(No.
of
years
)
9 Years
2001
Govt.
Officer
regul
ar
7 Years
2002
-do-
-do-
2
Er. Gulpreet
Soil
Singh
Conservatio
Aulakh
n Officer
Er. Baljinder
doSingh
Contact
Ph. No./
Fax/ Email
Qualification
01722777094; B.Tech(
2725330,
Agri.
dswcpunj Engg)
ab@gmai
-dol.com
Experience
Role
9
Monit
oring
8
Plan
ning
67
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Briefly describe State level Monitoring/Evaluation Cell
Financial Commission Rural Development & Panchyats, Joint Development Commissioner, Punjab and Chief Conservator of
Soils, Punjab alongwith their offices shall be responsible for state Level Monitoring/Evaluation
9.2.
A)
District Level Watershed Units
Briefly describe organizational structure of DRDA/ZP cell for watershed programme (total no.of
persons working, no.of permanent employees, no. of persons on contract basis, no.of persons paid
from DoLR grants under IWMP, other sources of funds)
Please find the details in Table-SPSP 30 below.
Table-SPSP 30: Details of functionaries in the DWDU/ DRDA Watershed Cell*(MIS Table-M(IS)4)
1
2
Name
S.
of the
No.
District
1
Ropar
7
6
Total no. Monthly
Name of
Date of
of
emolument
the
Status of
signing of persons
s of all
executin Chairma
MoU with working persons
g
n@
SLNA
for
working for
Agency#
IWMP
IWMP
DRDA
CEO ZP
1
Govt.
Employee
3
4
5
8
Details of the two personnel engaged in the Watershed Cell funded by DoLR
Name
Contact
Monthly Date of Nature of Tenure
and
Ph. No./ Qualifi- Experi
Remun Appoint- appoint- (No. of
Role
Desig
Fax/
e- cation ence
eration ment
ment$
years)
nation
mail
Harin Govt.
der
Employ
Singh ee
APO
Gradu
20 Moni
ate
years torin
g
68
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
2
3
Gurdas Divisiona
pur
l Soil
Conserv CEO,
ation
Zilaparis
Officer,
had
Gurdasp
ur
Hoshia DRDA
rpur
CEO ZP
2
2
Govt.Empl Sh. Govt.E Monitori
oyee
Anga mploye ng
d
e
Shar
ma
NA
Gradu 30
ate
Moni
torin
g
Govt.
Sh.
Employee Nirma
l
Singh
Govt.
B.K.
Employee Shar
ma,
APO
(M)
Balvir
Singh
,
Invest
igator
NA
Gradu 20
ate
M
Govt. Monitori N
Employ ng
ee
Govt. 27-10Employ 2008
ee
Gradu
10 Moni
ate
years torin
g
Govt. 27-10Employ 2008
ee
- do-
8 Moni
years torin
g
Similar structure, as above, is followed in all districts.
69
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
B)
Eligible districts (more than 25,000 ha area under watershed projects in the district) for strengthening
DRDA cell may be given.
Hoshiarpur, Gurdaspur and Ropar
9.3 PIA
The PIA for the state of Punjab has been identified as Department of Soil and Water Conservation Punjab
9.4
WDT
Watershed development team comprises of Team Leader as the Soil Conservation Officer( Soil And Water
Conservation Department) and the team members are Horticulture Development Officer(Horticulture
Department),
Agriculture Development Officer(department of Agriculture Punjab), Veterinary officer,
representative of KVK
9.5
Institutional arrangements at village level and people’s participation
The Watershed Committee shall constitute SHGs in the watershed area with the help of WDT from amongst poor, small
and marginal farmer households, landless/asset less poor agricultural labourers, women, shepherds and SC/STpersons.
These Groups shall be homogenous groups having common identity and interest who are dependent on the watershed
area for their livelihood. Each Self Help Group will be provided with a revolving fund of an amount to be decided by the
Nodal Ministry.
70
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
10 User Groups
The Watershed Committee (WC) shall also constitute User Groups in thewatershed area with the help of WDT. These
shall be homogenous groups of persons most affected by each work/ activity and shall include those having land holdings
within the watershed areas. Each User Group shall consist of those who are likely to derive direct benefits from a
particular watershed work or activity.
The Watershed Committee (WC) with the help of the WDT shall facilitate resource-use agreements among the User
Groups based on the principles of equity and sustainability. These agreements must be worked out before the concerned
work is undertaken. It must be regarded as a pre-condition for that activity. The User Groups will be responsible for the
operation and maintenance of all the assets created under the project in close collaboration with the Gram Panchayat and
the Gram Sabha.
71
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 10
10.0 Capacity building
a) Stake holders and capacity building requirements
S.No
1
Project Stakeholder
Target community
2
3
GPs
Watershed Committees
4
SHGs
5
6
UGs
WDTs
7
8
9
PIAs
DRDA/ZP cell
SLNA
Critical capacity gaps
Critical capacity gaps
Awareness among the members regarding the project,
participation and management
Awareness among the members regarding the project,
participation and management
Importance of SHG, working and sustainability
Participation, management and maintenance of the
assets created.
Project awareness
Project awareness
Project awareness
Project awareness
b) Strategies for capacity building
Briefly describe about strategies for capacity building
Kindly refer Table-SPSP 31 below.
72
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table-SPSP 31: List of Training Institutes@ identified for Capacity Building at State level (MIS Table-M(CB)1)
State Level
1
2
3
S. No.
Name of the
Training
Institute
Full Address
with contact
no., website
& e-mail
1.
2.
3.
4.
4
Name &
Designatio
n of the
Head of
Institute
Dr. V.K.
Reddy,
Directot(HR
D)
MANAGE,
Rajinder
HYDERABA Nagar ,
D
Hyderabad
,vkreddy
@manage.g
ov.in
NIRD,
Rajinder
Hyderabad
Nagar,
Hyderabad
Contact-04024016500
Punjab
Firozepur
Dr. M.S.
Agriculture
Road,
Kang, Vice
University
Ludhiana
Chancellor
CSWCRTI,
Dehradhun
218,
Kaulagarh
Road,
Dehradhun,
01352758564
Dr.
V.N.Sarda,
Director
5
6
7
Type of
Institute#
Area(s) of
specialization$
Accreditation
details
Capacity
Building
Central
---Do---Govt. Dept.
University
Agriculture/
Horticulture/F
orestry/Livelih
ood
Central
Participatory
Govt. Dept. Watershed
Development
73
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
District Level
1
S. No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
2
3
Full
Address
Name of the
with contact
Training
no.,
Institute
website &
e-mail
MANAGE,
Rajinder
HYDERABA Nagar ,
D
Hyderabad
,vkreddy
@manage.
gov.in
NIRD,
Rajinder
Hyderabad
Nagar,
Hyderabad
Contact04024016500
Punjab
Firozepur
Agriculture
Road,
University
Ludhiana
CSWCRTI,
Dehradhun
4
5
6
7
Name &
Designation
of the Head
of Institute
Type of
Institute#
Area(s) of
specialization$
Accreditation
details
Dr. V.K.
Reddy,
Director
(HRD)
Capacity
Building
Central
Givt. Dept.
Dr. M.S.
Kang, Vice
Chancellor
218,
Dr.
Kaulagarh
V.N.Sarda,
Road,
Director
Dehradhun,
01352758564
---Do----
University
Agriculture/
Horticulture/F
orestry/Livelih
ood
Central
Participatory
Govt. Dept. Watershed
Development
74
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Project Level
1
2
3
S. No.
Name of the
Training Institute
Full Address with contact no.,
website & e-mail
1.
2.
3
4.
4
Name &
Designatio
n of the
Head of
Institute
5
6
7
Type of
Institute#
Area(s) of
specialization$
Accredi
tation
details
Regional Station,
Dr. Y.S. Parmar
University of
Horticulture,
Jachh
Krishi Vigyan
Kendra,
Gurdaspur
Kangra Road , Jachh( Jasur), H.P.
University
01874-221743
Dr.
P.K.Ghuma
n
Soil & Water
Conservation
Training Institute,
Mohali
VIMARSH
Near Dara Studio, Phase-VI,
Mohali,
9872001605
Er.
S.K.Goel
Govt
Departmen
t
445, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III,
Gurgaon, 0124-4264909/08
Sh.
Manmohan
Khosla
NGO
Horticulture/F
orestry
Skill
Enhancement
Trainings to
SHG/UG/Far
mers
Soil & Water
Conservation
Capacity
Building
c) Information, Education & Communication (IEC) Activities:
Describe the IEC activities to be undertaken under IWMP:
75
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Table: SPSP 32: Details of IEC activities* (MIS Table-M(CB)3)
1
S.
No.
2
District
nil
3
4
Activity
Executing
agency
nil
5
Estimated
expenditure for
XI Plan period
(Rs. in lakh)
nil
6
Expected Outcome
(may quantify,
wherever possible)
nil
* From Column no. 2, total no. of Districts implementing the programme, from column no.3 no. of activities, from Column
no. 4, total no. of agencies, from column no. 5 total estimated expenditure may be given at the end of the table for the
entire State.
76
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 11
11.0 Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E)
Briefly describe plan to comply following:
Table-SPSP 33: List of Institutes@ identified for M & E at State level
1
2
3
S. No.
Name of the
Training
Institute
Full Address with contact no.,
website & e-mail
1
CSWCRTI,
Dehradhun
218, Kaulagarh Road,
Dehradhun, 0135-2758564
2
Punjab
Agriculture
University
VIMARSH
Firozepur Road, Ludhiana
Soil
Conservatio
n Society of
India
GG-3, National Societies
Block,National Agricultural Science
Centre Complex,Dev Prakash
Shastri Marg,Pusa Campus, New
Delhi-110012.
3
4.
5.
445, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III,
Gurgaon, 0124-4264909/08
Agricultural B-1/9, Community Centre,
finance
Janakpuri, New delhi-110058.
Corporation,
4
Name &
Designation
of the Head
of Institute
Dr.
V.N.Sarda,
Director
Dr. M.S.
Kang, Vice
Chancellor
Sh.
Manmohan
Khosla
Sh. S.K.
Dalal,
5
6
7
Type of
Institute#
Area(s) of specialization$
Accredi
tation
details
Central
Participatory
Govt. Dept. Watershed
Development
University
Agriculture/
Horticulture/Forestry
/Livelihood
NGO
Capacity Building
Society
Capacity Building,
Evaluation
Corporatio
n owned
byBanks,
NABARD
Capacity Building,
Evaluation
Coordinator
M.
Manjunatha,
Dy. Gen.
Manager &
Incharge
77
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Chapter 12
12 Expected outcomes
a) Briefly describe expected outcomes due to implementation of IWMP in the State,
Summarized in the table given below.
Table-SPSP 34: Expected/Estimated Outcomes (MIS Table-M(PO)F1)
1
2
3
4
5
S.
No.
Name
of the
District
Item
Unit of
measurement
Pre-project
Status
Ropar
Status of water table
Ground water structures repaired/
rejuvenated
Quality of drinking water
Availability of drinking water
Increase in irrigation potential
Change in cropping/ land use pattern
Area under agricultural crop
i
Area under single crop
ii
Area under double crop
iii
Area under multiple crop
Net increase in crop production area
Increase in area under vegetation
Increase in area under horticulture
Increase in area under fuel & fodder
Increase in milk production
No. of SHGs
Increase in no. of livelihoods
Increase in income
Mtr.
No.
Months
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Kg/cattle/day
No.
No.
Rs. Per
capita
6
Expected
Postproject
Status
160-180
155-175
Good
12
62
Good
12
75
7000
60000
6000
2000
55000
11000
4000
5000
1000
1000
2
7
Remarks
2000
78
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Migration
SHG Federations formed
Credit linkage with banks
Resource use agreements
WDF collection & management
Summary of lessons learnt
Gurdaspur
No. /
village
No.
No.
No.
per -
-
Shall be furnished at the end of the project.
Status of water table
Ground water structures repaired/
rejuvenated
Quality of drinking water
Availability of drinking water
Feet
140
135
Months
Good
12
Good
12
Increase in irrigation potential
Change in cropping/ land use pattern
Area under agricultural crop
i
Area under single crop
Ha
1111
1225
Ha
100
-
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Litres/Day
Nos
250
761
200
1050
139
15
35
05
500
25
05
Rs.700/Per
Capita
50%
reduction
1
12
ii
Area under double crop
iii Area under multiple crop
Net increase in crop production area
Increase in area under vegetation
Increase in area under horticulture
Increase in area under fuel & fodder
Increase in milk production
No. of SHGs
Increase in no. of livelihoods
Increase in income
Rs/
Capita
5
Per
Migration
SHG Federations formed
Credit linkage with banks
Nos
Nos
Nil
79
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB
Hoshiarpur
Resource use agreements
WDF collection & management
Summary of lessons learnt
Status of water table
Ground water structures repaired/
rejuvenated
Quality of drinking water
Availability of drinking water
Increase in irrigation potential
Change in cropping/ land use pattern
Area under agricultural crop
i
Area under single crop
ii Area under double crop
iii Area under multiple crop
Net increase in crop production area
Increase in area under vegetation
Increase in area under horticulture
Increase in area under fuel & fodder
Increase in milk production
No. of SHGs
Increase in no. of livelihoods
Increase in income
Migration
SHG Federations formed
Credit linkage with banks
Resource use agreements
WDF collection & management
Summary of lessons learnt
Nos
5
Lacs
Shall be furnished at the end of the project
Mtr.
125
110
No.
Months
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Ha
Kg/cattle/day
No.
No.
Rs. Per capita
No.
/
per
village
No.
No.
No.
Good
8
Good
12
200000
99667
25000
200000
88000
8560
0
2-4
0
135000
40000
230000
95000
10000
10000
6-8
20-25
Nil
0
0
0
2
80% SHG
As per
guidelines
0
As per
guidelines
Shall be furnished at the end of the project.
************
80
IWMP-SPSP-PUNJAB