NEIGHBORHOOD WORK PATTERN BOOK Introduction T he citizens of Grand Rapids understand what makes a healthy community and what needs to be done to nurture it. Nearly 3,000 residents, business professionals and community leaders participated at more than 250 meetings to develop Grand Rapids’ Master Plan which was adopted on November 14, 2002. As a result of their efforts, Grand Rapids now has a vision for its future. This vision includes great neighborhoods, vital business districts, a strong economy, balanced transportation, a city that enriches our lives and is in balance with nature, and partnerships to help us reached our desired goals. The best way in which to implement the Master Plan is to examine how our zoning ordinance works to implement the community’s vision. Unfortunately, our current zoning ordinance falls short of being able to breathe life into the recommendations that Grand Rapidians worked so hard to create. The last time the City’s Zoning Ordinance was re-written was in 1969…35 years ago. City Hall and the County building were about to be torn down and many homes and businesses were being demolished for US 131 and I-196 in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The auto-oriented thinking of the time still exists in our current zoning laws. This philosophy is contrary to the community vision contained in the recently adopted Master Plan. A lot has changed since then…new ways of thinking about development have emerged as people have realized that the “old” way of zoning does not work well for urban communities like Grand Rapids. The most drastic revisions to our current zoning ordinance are the result of trying to preserve the urban character of central city neighborhoods, business districts and the Downtown. The Urban Business District, Central Business District Zone (Downtown), R-1A Single Family Zone and the recently adopted Planned Redevelopment District are all “band-aids”. These were developed to try to maintain the fabric of our community, allow for new and creative ways to re-use old buildings and encourage redevelopment. Unfortunately, many gaps still remain and the disjointed nature of so many revisions has made the current code very difficult to use. In those parts of the community that were developed according to the 1969 zoning ordinance, many of the regulations still work well today. However, as land use changes occur in these areas will current regulations be good enough to advance the community’s vision for the future? Your involvement in the creation of a City Pattern Book will help determine what type of development is located in your part of the city, as well as those areas where redevelopment is possible. We encourage you to participate in the Zone Grand Rapids process, just as so many citizens did with Plan Grand Rapids, to help create better development regulations for our community. Please fill out this workbook to provide needed information on your neighborhood pattern type and areas for change. T his Neighborhood Pattern Workbook will provide needed information to City staff about the various land development components that make up your “neighborhood”. This area could be the block that you live on or own a business, it could include several blocks around you, or it could be defined more specifically by the boundaries of your neighborhood or business association. However you define your “neighborhood” we would like to learn about it! Please… • Review the background material provided before answering the questions. • Complete the workbook by January 14, 2005. • Deliver to City of Grand Rapids Planning Department, City Hall, 300 Monroe 9th Floor, Grand Rapids, MI 49503. Your information is important. The input that you provide with this workbook will let the Planning Department know if we are on the right track and where adjustments need to be made. In addition, the areas of change information that you provide will contribute to Community Forum #2. Thank you in advance for your participation. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 2 Pattern Book Preparation: Public Participation Process The Pattern Book’s three-phase public involvement component began in September 2004 and ends in June 2005. The new zoning ordinance will be drafted by December 2005. Phase One: Community Inventory City staff and our consultant, JJR, have been mapping periods of residential construction within Grand Rapids to understand typical development patterns. Each of these patterns has a distinct set of physical characteristics that provide a great deal of information about the character of our community. During this phase, citizens will be asked to review these community patterns and determine if they appropriately describe their geographic area. Participants will be asked to react to proposed pattern boundaries and describe zoning issues within their “neighborhood” through the use of a workbook. Phase Two: Preliminary Pattern Book The preliminary pattern book will highlight: • areas/districts where there is agreement on the valued characteristics of existing patterns and a desire to maintain these basic patterns, The Zone Grand Rapids Process A s part of a grassroots effort to update the City’s Zoning Ordinance, we are asking for your help to create a City Pattern Book. This Pattern Book will identify the key development components that people believe are important. Each pattern type will help capture the essential urban design components necessary to preserve (or create) the character of an area. For example, Urban Business District zoning in our current code states buildings should be near the sidewalk with parking located to the side or rear. These requirements are important to business districts such as Eastown where pedestrian traffic and the areas’ character attract people for dining, shopping and entertainment. • areas/districts where changes in existing patterns are desired, and • the nature of that change, as defined by Master Plan objectives and policies. The Pattern Book will include photographs, diagrams and tables to communicate these preliminary directions. People will have the opportunity to refine and revise the text at sub-area workshops and a larger community forum. Phase Three: Visualizing Outcomes Community participation in Phase Two will uncover those areas where people disagree. Future scenarios for these priority areas will be developed to show alternative strategies for new development. Illustrative examples of change areas and their transition from existing conditions to desired conditions will be provided. Illustrated alternatives will allow people to “visualize” potential development. Then, another series of sub-area workshops will be held and a finalized pattern book will be developed. This information will serve as a basis for the new zoning ordinance. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 3 Patterns of Development Grand Rapids is primarily comprised of four different neighborhood patterns* that can be readily identified by development era. The architectural inf luences (Victorian versus ranch) are as important as the primary mode of transportation (walking, streetcar, automobile) during a certain time period. This map was created using City Assessor information based upon year of construction for residential properties. * Based upon preliminary investigations. Turn of the Century Neighborhood - 1 1850 - 1900 Early 20th Century Neighborhood - 2 1900 - 1945 Post War Neighborhood - 3 1945 - 1970 Late 20th Century Neighborhood - 4 1970 - Present Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 4 Neighborhood Patterns Turn of the Century Neighborhood Early 20th Century Neighborhood Post War Neighborhood Late 20th Century Neighborhood Development Era Development Era Development Era Development Era Street Pattern and Block Size Street Pattern and Block Size Street Pattern and Block Size Street Pattern and Block Size • Grid • Grid, introduction of curvilinear • Curvilinear streets, introduction of cul-de-sacs. May or may not have sidewalks. • Smaller blocks (400 feet or less). • Smaller and medium sized blocks (400-600 feet). • Medium (400-600 feet) to large blocks (600 feet or more). Turn of the Century Neighborhood Early 20th Century Neighborhood Post War Neighborhood Late 20th Century Neighborhood Walkability Walkability Walkability Walkability Land Use Patterns Land Use Patterns Land Use Patterns Land Use Patterns Built between 1850 and 1900 in and around the central city. • Straight connected streets, with alleys and sidewalk predominant. • High walkability, connected street system. Walking distance generally 15 minutes. Uses mixed within the neighborhood and within selected blocks. Housing, commercial, institutional (churches; schools) and factories well integrated (e.g., apartments above stores; factories close to homes). Single- and multifamily housing also integrated with a broad range of multi-family types (duplexes; townhouses; small apartment buildings), often located on major streets and at intersections. Little green space (or concentrated in small parks or squares). Approximately 1900 to 1945. Developed around street car lines. Built after World War II, approximately 1945 to 1970. • Straight connected streets, with sidewalks predominant. • High walkability, connected street system. Walking distance generally 15 minutes. • Reduced walkability, disconnected street system. “Feeder” streets go into larger arterials. Uses mixed within the neighborhood and within selected blocks (apartments/offices above stores). Commercial mixed-use districts located on streetcar routes within easy walking distance of residential. Single- and multifamily housing types integrated with a range of multi-family types, often located on major streets and at intersections. Larger parks within and on the “outer” edges of neighborhoods. Substantially reduced integration of residential and non-residential uses within the neighborhood and/or on selected blocks. Commercial clustered in centers at major intersections and/ or in strip commercial format (28 th Street); large institutional sites/super blocks. Some smaller scale multi-family continues to be integrated into single-family residential areas. 1970 to present. mately 1945 to 1970. • Curvilinear streets and cul-desacs. Few sidewalks. • Large blocks (600 feet or more) and superblocks (½ - 1 mile). • Reduced walkability, disconnected street system. “Feeder” streets go into larger arterials. Little to no mix of uses within a neighborhood or on selected blocks. Larger multi-family complexes are separated from single-family residential areas. Commercial development increasingly segregated in larger strip centers or major shopping centers. Institutional and industrial uses are developed on larger tracts or campuses. Large “natural areas” used as green space. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 5 Turn of the Century Neighborhood Development Patterns Architectural Patterns 1850 to 1900 Vertical Mixed Use Entry Orientation • Residential and/or office often above retail. • Entries oriented toward the street. Residential porches or stoops common. Lot Width • Small/narrow lots predominate (33-50 ft.). Larger lots in wealthier residential areas. Entry Definition Front Setback Windows • Narrow setbacks (5-10 ft.) for worker housing; larger setbacks (10-25 ft.) in wealthier residential areas. • Ample residential windows. • Commercial buildings typically located on front property line (0 ft.) Building Height T he city's older neighborhoods generally have smaller footprint uses on smaller sites, with front facades for both residential and commercial uses located close to the sidewalk and parking located to the rear of the lot and/or on the street. While building uses and heights may vary, transitions in density and scale are usually incremental. These patterns create a dense, rich urban fabric with a pedestrian-oriented street environment. The Master Plan recommends that new development be carefully designed to maintain walkability and promote sensitivity to the built context by respecting existing lot sizes, front yard setbacks, building heights and by re-thinking parking strategies. (See Chapter 10.0, Development Character). • Commercial buildings predominantly 2+ stories (office or residential above retail). • Industrial lofts 4- to 6-stories. • Single-family heights vary, with 2 to 2 ½ stories predominant for single-family. • Commercial and residential entries well defined. • Commercial storefronts facing the street, windows have high transparency. Articulation/massing • Building mass well articulated and detailed. Roof Type • Flat roofs predominant for multifamily and commercial development. • Steeply pitched roofs typical for single family. Materials • Materials vary. • Multi-family 3-6 stories (including converted industrial lofts). Parking • Limited commercial and residential parking located to the rear (typically accessed by alleyways) and on-street. • Parking screened by buildings. Early 20th Century Neighborhood Development Patterns Architectural Patterns 1900 to 1945 Vertical Mixed Use • Residential and/or office above retail. Entry Orientation Lot Width • Relatively small commercial lots (40-150 ft.) • Small to medium size residential lots (33-50 ft.) Front Setback • Commercial buildings typically located on front property line (0 ft.) T Entry Definition • Commercial and residential entries well defined. Windows • Commercial storefronts facing the street, windows have high transparency. • Ample residential windows. • Residential setbacks typically 5-15 ft. for multi-family and 10-20 ft. on single-family lots. Articulation/massing Building Height Roof Type • Commercial predominantly 2 stories. he compatibility of new development with the valued characteristics of existing neighborhoods will require careful attention to the details of urban design. Today's zoning ordinance provides several examples (Article 16. Central Business District; Article 16A. Traditional Business District) of how these important issues can be addressed, while still providing substantial f lexibility for creative design solutions. Urban design standards can address build-to lines, the orientation and definition of entries, the amount and proportions of window areas, the articulation of building mass, roof types, building materials, signs, landscaping and screening. These details determine the degree of "fit" with the positive characteristics of the existing built context. • Entries oriented toward the street. Residential porches or stoops common. • Single-family 2-2½ stories, and multi-family 2-4 stories. Parking • Commercial and residential parking located to the rear of the lot and on-street. Rear parking areas typically accessed by alleyways • Building mass well articulated and detailed. • Flat roofs predominant for multifamily and commercial development. • Steeply pitched roofs typical for single family. Materials • Materials vary. • Parking screened by buildings. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 6 Post War Neighborhood Development Patterns Architectural Patterns 1945 to 1970 Vertical Mixed Use Entry Orientation • No vertical mix of uses. • Building entries stil predominantly oriented to the street. Lot Width • Larger single-use building footprints. • Larger commercial properties (100+ ft.) • Residential entries less well defined, though stoops/porches still appear. • Larger multi-family lots (40-150 ft.) Windows • Larger/wider residential lots (40-90 ft.) Front Setback • Deeper front setbacks (15-40 ft.) and wider parkways. Building Height • 1-story commercial buildings. D evelopment patterns after World-War II changed substantially from focusing on the pedestrian to the automobile. The city’s “newer” suburban neighborhoods have a more spacious feel with buildings located farther from the street and larger lots. Parking areas are no longer located behind a building but rather at the front of a building, or parallel to the front. Land uses and residential densities are primarily segregated from one another. The Master Plan recognizes the value of providing housing choice and the desirability of a suburban area, particularly for families. Likely areas of change include “worn” commercial areas that have been out-done by newer strip shopping centers and shopping malls. These commercial areas may provide for new redevelopment opportunities. Entry Definition • Mix of 1- and 2-story residential buildings (ranch style introduced). • Windows still face the street, but take on horizontal proportions and smaller sizes in some ranch designs. Articulation/massing • Articulation of building mass and detailing simplified. Roof Type • Mix of roof types with shallow pitches introduced. Materials Parking • Materials vary. • Commercial parking located in front yards, between building and street. • Residential parking still predominantly detached and located to the rear of the lot; carports in front yard, and attached garages adjacent to front façade begin to appear. Late 20th Century Neighborhood Development Patterns Architectural Patterns 1970 to Present Vertical Mixed Use Entry Orientation • No vertical mix of uses. Lot Width • Increasingly large, single-use building footprints. • Residential entries parallel to, or behind, parking areas. • Larger commercial properties (250+ ft.) Entry Definition • Larger multi-family lots (150-800 ft.) Windows • Larger/wider residential lots (60-120 ft.) Front Setback • Deeper front setbacks and wider parkways. • Broad (25+ ft.) T he larger lots and deeper setbacks in these residential areas give them a more spacious, suburban feel. While these qualities should be preserved, alternative design approaches that reduce the dominance of garages on the street and re-emphasize the importance of well defined entries and windows oriented to the street are needed. In these neighborhoods, the Master Plan also recommends locating multi-family development within walking distance of transit, strategies for encouraging higher quality design and restructuring existing commercial concentrations (especially those located on transit lines) as walkable mixed-use centers (see Chapter 4.0 Vital Business Districts). • Commercial entries oriented to parking lots Building Height • Commercial properties typically 1story, office buildings 1-4 stories. • Entries less well-defined. • Transparency on commercial and residential development reduced. Articulation/massing • Articulation of building mass and detailing vary. Roof Type • Roof pitches vary. Materials • Materials vary. • Mix of 1- and 2-story single-family homes; multifamily generally 2-3 stories. Parking • Commercial parking located in front yards, between building and street; increasingly large parking lots. • Residential with attached garages located parallel, or in front of, front façade; introduction of "snout" houses. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 7 Where’s Your Neighborhood? Please identify on one of the four following street maps the location of your “neighborhood”. This area could be the block that you live on or own a business, it could include several blocks around you, or it could be defined more specifically by the boundaries of your neighborhood or business association. You pick the area! My neighborhood is bounded by the following streets: East West North South Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 8 Where’s Your Neighborhood? My neighborhood is bounded by the following streets: East West North South Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 9 Where’s Your Neighborhood? My neighborhood is bounded by the following streets: East West North South Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 10 Where’s Your Neighborhood? My neighborhood is bounded by the following streets: East West North South Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 11 Existing Land Use Map Use this map to help answer the land use questions about your neighborhood on Page 13. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 12 What’s Your Neighborhood Pattern? Please help test the four neighborhood pattern types by marking the number in each category that best describes your neighborhood. When finished, use the sum of the marked numbers to determine your neighborhood pattern and then answer the questions on Page 14. Use the maps concerning street patterns (Pages 8-11) and existing land use (Page 12) to help answer the following questions. Street Pattern Block Size Walkability Distance to Destination Parks Parkways and Streetscapes Civic Structures (Churches, Schools) Mixed Uses In a Building Mixed Uses On a Lot Mixed Uses In a Block Single-Use Areas Housing Diversity 111 2 3 4 Straight, Connected w/Alleys Straight, Connected, No Alleys Curvilinear, Some Cul-De-Sacs Curvilinear, Many Cul-De-Sacs 111 2 3 4 Small (400’ or Less) Small-Medium (400’-600’) Medium-Large (600’ or More) Superblocks (½ - 1 Mile) 111 3 4 Sidewalks Predominant Connecting Origins/Destinations Some/Few Sidewalks; Lacking Consistent Connections No Sidewalks or Consistent Connections 111 3 Less than 15 Minutes Walking (to Schools, Shopping) More than 15 Minutes Walking (to Schools, Shopping) 111 2 4 Small, Often Associated w/Schools Medium, Includes Passive & Active Recreation Large, Natural Areas 111 2 3 Narrow Parkway (5’ or Less), Limited Street Trees Medium Parkway (5’-10’); Street Trees Large Parkway (10’ or Larger); Street Trees 111 3 Small Site in Neighborhood Large Site Set Apart from Neighborhood 111 2 3 Many Mixed-Use Buildings Some Mixed-Use Buildings One/None Mixed-Use Building in Area 111 2 3 Many (6 or More) Uses on a Lot Some (2 - 5) Uses on a Lot One/None Mixed Uses 111 2 3 Many Blocks w/Mixed-Uses Some Blocks w/Mixed-Uses One/None Blocks w/Mixed-Use 111 3 Uses are Mixed All Uses are Separate Example: Retail on Bottom, Residential Above Example: Residential Buildings w/ Commercial Storefronts Example: SingleFamily Residential Only on a Block 111 2 3 Large Range of Choices (SingleFamily, Two-Family, Multi-Family Some Choice of Housing Types Limited Choice of Housing Types, Similar Price Range TOTAL ____ 12-17 POINTS 18-23 POINTS 24-35 POINTS 36-40 POINTS Turn of the Century Neighborhood Early 20th Century Neighborhood Post War Neighborhood Late 20th Century Neighborhood 1850 - 1900 1900 - 1945 1945 - 1970 1970 - Present Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 13 What’s Your Neighborhood Pattern? (continued) After totaling your point score, does the corresponding neighborhood pattern accurately reflect your area? Yes____ Somewhat ____ No ____ If not, what makes your area different from the neighborhood pattern?_______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Is there another neighborhood pattern that more closely reflects your area?___________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Do you have more than one neighborhood pattern? If so, what are they?_____________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ How closely does the Patterns of Development Map on Page 4 reflect your area? On the space below please draw a map that illustrates where there is a dividing line between different pattern types in your neighborhood if they exist. ____________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Do we need another, or more, neighborhood pattern(s)?___________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Could any of the four patterns be combined? ____________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Additional comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Please draw a map that illustrates where there is a dividing line between different pattern types in your neighborhood if they exist. N Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 14 Development and Architectural Patterns T here are a number of different elements that can further define a neighborhood pattern beyond streets and land use. Development and architectural patterns help describe the physical environment of an area and work together to create the “character” of a neighborhood. Elements that contribute to the physical development pattern of a neighborhood include: • Lot size/lot width • Front setback • Building coverage of a lot • Building height • Off-street parking On the following pages, please respond to which measurement best characterizes development in your “neighborhood”. Again, this area could be the block that you live on or own a business, it could include several blocks around you, or it could be defined more specifically by the boundaries of your neighborhood or business association. It is that area which you defined on Pages 8-11 of this workbook. If you decide to take physical measurements of your area, please feel free to include this valuable information adjacent to each pattern element. If photos help capture the character of your neighborhood please submit these with your completed workbook. At the back of the workbook is a glossary for your use that provides a definition for each element. Architectural details include: • Entry orientation • Entry definition • Windows • Building articulation/massing • Roof type • Materials Development Patterns Please fill in the circle that best corresponds to the description of your neighborhood. Lot Size/ Width Small Medium Large Very Large (28 - 39’ Wide) (40 - 59’ Wide) (60 - 80’ Wide) (80’+ Wide) Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Front Setback 0 - 10’ 10 - 20’ 20-30’ Over 30’ Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 15 Development Patterns Please fill in the circle that best corresponds to the description of your neighborhood. Building Coverage of Lot 75% or More About 50% About 30% Less than 30% Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Building Height Predominantly 2 to 4 Story Predominantly <Mix> Predominantly Over 4 Stories 1 Story 2 Story Single-Family.................................. m ................ m .............. m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ................ m .............. m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ................ m .............. m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ................ m .............. m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ................ m .............. m .................................... m ................................... m Off-Street Parking Surface Lot Screened Surface Lot located Detached Garage to Attached Garage at by Building between Building/Street Rear of Lot Front Facade Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Off-Street Parking (continued) Garage Projects beyond Surface Lot Size Surface Lot Size Surface Lot Size Front Facade Small Medium Large Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 16 Architectural Patterns Please fill in the circle that best corresponds to the description of your neighborhood. Entry Orientation Porches/Stoops Oriented Oriented to Oriented towards Street Parking Lot to the Side Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Entry Definition Hidden Well Less Defined Well Defined Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m Windows Ample Windows Fewer/Smaller Horizontal Window Vertical Window Facing the Street Windows on Street Proportions Proportions Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m ................................... m Building Articulation/ Massing Well Articulated Simplified Massing Smaller Components and Detailed and Detailing on Large Buildings ..................................... m .................................... m Single-Family.................................. m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 17 Architectural Patterns Please fill in the circle that best corresponds to the description of your neighborhood. Roof Type Steep Pitch Shallow Pitch Flat Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m Materials Predominantly Predominantly Mostly Masonry Clapboard (Horizontal) Vertical Siding (Brick, Stucco) Single-Family.................................. m ..................................... m .................................... m Multi-Family................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Commercial/Mixed Use .................. m ..................................... m .................................... m Institutional.................................... m ..................................... m .................................... m Industrial ........................................ m ..................................... m .................................... m Development and Architectural Patterns Questions Are there other development or architectural elements that you think are important to examine? If so, what are they? _______ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What two elements that contribute to development patterns do you think are the most important? Why? __________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What two elements that contribute to development patterns are the least important? Why? ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What two elements that contribute to architectural patterns are the most important? Why? ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What two elements that contribute to architectural patterns are the least important? Why? ___________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Additional comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 18 Areas of Change C itizens discussed where there were opportunities for change in their neighborhood during Plan Grand Rapids. Identification of these change areas helped to focus discussion on where the community could expect, or would like to see, change happen in the future and the nature of that change. Change happens quickly, as you will note when examining the “Opportunities for Change” maps on Pages 21-23. These maps were prepared during the Plan Grand Rapids process in the Spring of 2001 and address those places where changing conditions could be found in the city’s neighborhoods, business areas and the larger community. Many recommendations cited by citizens have already happened! As a result of the community’s input, a number of significant recommendations were developed in the Master Plan. Several key recommendations are listed on the following page alongside Grand Rapids’ Future Land Use map. The future land use map is intended to be a guide for land development over the next 20 years and is not ref lective of actual zoning districts within the city. The future land use map is very general in nature. This was done on purpose to extend the life of the Master Plan and the map. A zoning map, however, is much more specific. A zoning map actually defines parcel by parcel what types of uses are permitted and the development regulations that apply to each piece of land within the city. The existing land use map (Page 12) shows the kind of land uses that are currently in existence on a particular piece of land. The future land use map (Page 20) shows what the community would like to see in the future. When these two maps are compared there are noticable you differences. If the City’s official Zoning map was added into this mix you would see even more discrep- ancies where our current zoning laws don’t match up to land uses that presently exist or to those that we would like to see in the future. Because the zoning map information is so detailed (59 pages alone), it has not been included in this workbook. Your participation in this portion of the workbook is crucial to assist city staff in understanding those areas where you anticipate things will stay the same and where change will occur, and what that change should be. This input may help direct how future zoning districts are defined and where their boundaries are located. To illustrate these areas of change you may either provide street boundary names (East, West, North and South), draw a new map, use the street maps provided on Pages 8-11 or download parcel maps over aerial photos from the City’s website at: www.ci.grand-rapids.mi.us . If you click on the banner titled “maps” and enter as a guest you can look at parcel information. The toolbar on the right-hand side will help to navigate the site. A s you define the portions of your neighborhood that will stay the same and those where change is anticipated, please try to select areas not individual sites. For example, if you are thinking of a neighborhood business area please do not select one particular building to change but look at an entire block. Should the block remain the same with a mix of commercial and residential uses or should it be converted to all commercial uses or all residential dwellings? Think also about a change in physical form…perhaps row houses would be an appropriate replacement for an area that has experienced a mass conversion of single-family homes into multi-family units. Areas of Change Questions First, let’s rule out those areas where you don’t anticipate change to happen. Are there parts of your neighborhood that you would like to see stay the same? If so, where? ________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Which neighborhood pattern type best depicts this area? __________________________________________________________ Next, where do you think change will happen in the next five or ten years? Please define in terms of blocks or small geographic areas, not by one particular parcel or building. You may also wish to refer to the Master Plan recommendations and the input received from the Master Plan process (see Pages 20-23) for additional ideas. ___________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What kinds of land uses and/or building types would you like to see in these change areas? ___________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ What should this new development look like? Please refer to the development and architectural patterns section for ideas. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 19 Future Land Use Map The Future Land Use Map depicts desired land use patterns for the future. Traditional Business Areas (TBAs), Mixed-Use Centers (Neighborhood, Village, and Sub Regional) and those areas identified as Mixed-Use Areas (A-E) are the most likely places in the city where the Master Plan anticipates change to occur. Adopted November 14, 2002 The City of Grand Rapids Master Plan Recommends: • Maintain Downtown as the regional mixed-use center; • Create transit-oriented mixed-use centers; • Make Grand Rapids a competitive housing location; • Design streets to enhance safety, create image corridors, and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle needs; • Provide a choice of neighborhood types, each with an expanded range of housing opportunities; • Expand green space and recreational opportunities; • Support mixed-income neighborhoods; • Protect valued natural resources and improve stormwater management; • Promote quality urban design and neighborhood character preservation; • Increase community and regional collaboration; • Prepare development character guidelines; and • Coordinate the location of higher density residential development and job centers with transit routes; • Reorganize traditional business areas into a series of compact retail/ mixed-use cores linked by higher density residential/mixed-use connectors; • Promote the preparation of area-specific plans as a means to provide closer analysis of specific mixed-use areas to maintain community character and quality of life. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 20 Opportunities for Change Neighborhoods Participants at seven area-specific meetings across the city identified and mapped nearly 400 opportunities for change that were combined into city wide maps and tables listing anticipated, desired or feared changes. This information was synthesized into more general types of opportunities for change for discussion at Plan Grand Rapids Community Forum #2. There, participants confirmed (and added to) the types of opportunities for change and identified those considered most important to the future of the city’s neighborhoods. The results are summarized below: • Protect, sustain and revitalize neighborhoods. • Improve compatibility between residential and non-residential uses. • Address possible school closings and building/property reuse. • Encourage appropriate infill housing in older neighborhoods. A number of changes have occurred since the creation of the Master Plan including: • Revitalization plans for the D.A. Blodgett building by Fairmount Square Partners. • New home construction in the Baxter neighborhood and plans for a new park. • Down-zoning of the SWAN neighborhood. • Preservation of Jefferson Elementary School. Specific “change” recommendations that correspond to the above map which have yet to be implemented include: NUMBER 1-N-1 1-N-2 1-N-3 1-N-6 1-N-7 1-N-8 1-N-9 1-N-12 1-N-14 1-N-17 1-N-18 2-N-1 WHERE Seward Ave. Corridor Leonard/Davis Meat Packing Library Covell corridor neighborhood Turner Shamut School tree farm Druke residence property 146 Le xington 821 LK. Michigan Drive NE corner Fulton/Gold GVSU campus expansion Landlocked fields between Aberdeen and 3 mile Rd. 2-N-2 2-N-3 2-N-5 Single family W. of Leffingwell G.R.P.S bus depot E. of College S. of Leonard. Kent Hills Country Club, SE corner of Plainfield/Knapp Romence Gardens South of Michigan Street Leonard St. Corridor Olds Manor Heartside Manor Wealthy/ Jefferson Mid-Town Mayfield school Baldwin and Hermitage Visser area Alger Heights residential Vacant/Boarded/Graffiti Barth/Wealthy Vacant City Lot Giddings/Thomas Grandville Ave. Campau Commons Hall and Jefferson Deleware, Jefferson, and Cass Buchanan Trailer Park Parcel near 28 th St. & Division 2-N-6 2-N-9 3-N-1 3-N-3 3-N-5 4-N-1 4-N-4 4-N-5 4-N-6 5-N-1 6-N-6 6-N-7 6-N-8 6-N-10 7-N-1 7-N-3 7-N-6 7-N-7 7-N-9 7-N-10 HOW Tie Renaissance. Zones Help > Preser ve, prevent >Improve, beautify > > > Relocate “heavy commercial” > Develop, preser ve Study Restore, reuse Preser ve, develop Develop, preser ve Study Preser ve, redevelop Redevelop Redevelop, infill Revitalize Preserve, reuse Revitalize Support Reduce or prevent > > Build Renovate Redesign Rehab Rehab, develop Redevelop Study, redevelop WHAT What will it look like? Fit into neighborhood. More pedestrian friendly neighborhood. Coordination. Change. Maintain the area. Redevelopment/beautification. Study streets and aesthetics. Future? Develop? Reuse Building not appropriate in a residential area. Clean up. Threat to residents along Fulton. Coordinate with neighborhood. Consistent with single family res. to South and West; multifa mily to North. Open space connected to Huff Park system. Long-term prospect for narrow and deep lots with single family homes Green space of carrier creek ravine. Public facility less disruptive of re sidential uses. Green space, undeveloped “natural”. Some housing. Residential compatible to nearby single family. Open space potential. Corridor studies RE: Single family dwellings and major traffic arterial. Use as a residential property or as a hotel property. Neighborhood area. Housing Improvements Rental housing. Develop a good neighborhood. Redevelop and beautify these things. Redevelop the area. Street home Senior citizen housing. Revitalize area. Add more park and landscaping to the front. Tear down and infill. Add mixed density housing. Continue housing ICCF Targeted housing code enforcement. To respect residential. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 21 Opportunities for Change Economy Participants at seven area-specific meetings across the city identified and mapped nearly 400 opportunities for change that were combined into city wide maps and tables listing anticipated, desired or feared changes. This information was synthesized into more general types of opportunities for change for discussion at Plan Grand Rapids Community Forum #2. There, participants confirmed (and added to) the types of opportunities for change and identified those considered most important to the future of the city’s economy. The results are summarized below: • Make the Grand River a centerpiece of the economy (for example, by the addition of housing and mixed-use). • Convert existing industrial, commercial and institutional buildings to alternative uses. • Support small business. • Manage institutional growth for neighborhood compatibility. A number of changes have occurred since the creation of the Master Plan including: • Reuse of the water filtration plant on Monroe for offices. • Purchase and redevelopment of the Speedy Mart at Wealthy and Fuller SE. • Creation of a new golf course near Covell and 196 and reuse of the Domtar site for Millenium Park. Specific “change” recommendations that correspond to the above map which have yet to be implemented include: NUMBER 1-E-1 1-E-2 1-E-3 1-E-7 1-E-12 1-E-13 1-E-17 1-E-23 1-E-24 2-E-1 2-E-3 2-E-4 3-E-1 3-E-2 3-E-6 4-E-2 4-E-4 4-E-5 4-E-6 5-E-1 5-E-2 5-E-3 5-E-4 5-E-5 5-E-6 5-E-7 5-E-8 5-E-9 6-E-1 6-E-3 6-E-4 7-E-1 7-E-6 7-E-7 7-E-8 7-E-9 7-E-10 7-E-11 7-E-12 7-E-13 7-E-15 WHERE HOW Seward Ave. Corridor Tie Ren. Zones Ann & Turner part of Ren. Zone #1 Connect Used car grave yard @ Anne & Turner Reuse Alpine/ 9th comm. buildings > Shamut School tree farm > Druke residence property > NE corner Fulton/Gold > Hemlock Junk yards & city impound lots, Padnos Create Old A & P warehouse > Baker Furniture Bldg. on Monroe Renovate, revitalize Creston Library building Preserve, reuse Automotive training facility NE corner Leonard/Ball Study Olds Manor Preser ve, redevelop Post office Preserve, reuse FIA site Redevelop, reuse Michigan/Diamond Redevelop Mayfield school Preserve, reuse Corner of Fulton & Carlton Reuse Retail strip from Eastern to Carlton Develop Claston office site Metro hospital Preser ve, redevelop Kentwood Town Center Develop Boston Square Reinvest Kalamazoo N. of 28 th Develop Kalamazoo Development site Preserve Meijer @ 28th Preser ve and redevelop Town and Country Develop 44 th and Kalamazoo Revitalize Diamond/Lake; Wealthy/F uller; Franklin/Neland; Jefferson/Franklin. Convert Wealthy/Fuller > Brother Love site > Grandville Ave. Delta Properties Revitalize Job corps Renovate and landscape Cottage/Madison Design Cottage Grove/1577-1555 Jeffer son Rebuild Dexter lot warehouse Remove Junk car place Replace Older buildings ERB Lumber Redevelop 28 th Street corridor Revitalize WHAT What will it look like? Fit into neighborhood. To renaissance zone #2. ? Reuse. Future? Develop? Clean up. High tech corridor. Develop. Mixed-use dev elopment; reesidental and office spaces with river walk orientation. Potential for retail and commercial Commercial corridor or commercial focus and center. Use as a residential property or as a hotel property. As a Post Office, examine options. Clean up. Brownf ield? Retail uses. Business. Renew commercial uses. Interesting possibility Needs a facelift. New businesses. Home improvement theme. Renew commercial uses. Develop as driving range. Corner as open space. Needs a face-lift is old and outdated. Needs development. Reinvest and renew commerial uses Upgrade and improve commercial area Convert vacant gas station. Explore other commercial use. Franklin/Lafayette needs a bus stop. Redevelop the area. Redevelop this site after he retir es in order to keep it an asset for the community. Revitalize area. The outside. Relocate entrance and add landscaping and trees “de-institutionalize” appearance. Improve image. Possible tech zone. Manufacturing (Renaissance Zone). Outdoor storage and clean up, add jobs. Potential relocation center. Respect and reuse them. Study Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 22 Opportunities for Change Neighborhood Businesses Participants at seven area-specific meetings across the city identified and mapped nearly 400 opportunities for change that were combined into city wide maps and tables listing anticipated, desired or feared changes. This information was synthesized into more general types of opportunities for change for discussion at Plan Grand Rapids Community Forum #2. There, participants confirmed (and added to) the types of opportunities for change and identified those considered most important to the future of the city’s business areas. The results are summarized below: • Establish/preserve public spaces. • Reuse specific buildings for retail or other business use. • Encourage building repair, renovation and façade improvement. • Adaptively reuse commercial buildings for office, housing or mixed-use. • Emphasize traditional business district character. A number of changes have occurred since the creation of the Master Plan including: • Redevelopment of vacant property near Madison/Hall into mixed-use development. • New Easthills Center at the “Center of the Universe”. • Reopening of the 7-11 on West Fulton. Specific “change” recommendations that correspond to the above map which have yet to be implemented include: NUMBER 1-B-2 1-B-3 1-B-4 1-B-7 1-B-9 1-B-10 1-B-12 1-B-13 1-B-15 2-B-2 2-B-3 2-B-4 2-B-5 3-B-2 4-B-3 4-B-5 4-B-6 4-B-7 4-B-10 5-B-1 5-B-2 5-B-3 5-B-4 5-B-5 5-B-6 5-B-7 5-B-8 6-B-1 6-B-3 6-B-7 6-B-10 6-B-11 6-B-12 6-B-13 6-B-14 6-B-15 6-B-15 6-B-16 6-B-17 7-B-1 7-B-2 7-B-3 7-B-4 7-B-5 7-B-6 7-B-7 7-B-14 WHERE Leonard/Davis Meat Packing Leonard business corridor Johnson’s car lot Alpine/ 9th comm. buildings Bridge St. business corridor Archer y facility Straight/W. Fulton Polish Deli at Garfield/Watson Old A & P warehouse Plainfield Ave., Spencer to Sweet Creston Library building Weidenfeller site. SW corner of Spencer North Division/Plainfield fr Coldbrook to Leonard/North Wealthy/Jeffer son Wealthy and Arthur parking lot Corner of Fulton & Carlton Retail strip from Eastern to Carlton BP at Diamond & Lake Kent Records Calvin College area Seymour Square Burton/Eastern Boston Square Alger Heights commercial NW Corner of Burton and Madison 44 th and Kalamazoo Town and Country Diamond/Lake; Wealthy/Fuller; Franklin/Neland; Jefferson/Franklin. Eureka/Sigsbee Barth/Wealthy Norwood/Lake Eastern/Logan Vacant lot with phones Commercial building Dees (empty) Next to gas st ation Store front 831 Franklin Franklin/ Dolbee Fr anklin/Eastern Business Firebarn Vacant Sheldon/Franklin No fault insurance Mulrihill Dodge (vacant)- bus storage Bait Shop Old Library Burton to 28 th on Division HOW Help Upgrade > > Upgrade Repair > > > Restore Preser ve and reuse Clear and redevelop Convert buildings Redevelop, infill Use, develop Reuse Develop Redevelop Use Develop Preser ve, redevelop Expand Reinve st Reinvest WHAT More pedestrian friendly neighborhood. Historic business area. Redevelop (gas). Reuse. Historic business area. Broken windows etc. Revitalize. Reuse. Develop Commercial area buildings. Historic appearance and neighborhood commercial ser vic e. Potential for retail and commercial. Abandoned commercial buildings into housing. Connection of N. Monroe revitalization to Plainfield. N ew commercial uses. Revitalize Develop Retail or other. Brownfield? Retail uses. Business New gas station with convenience, combine with property next store. Underutilized, use for housing. Retail ser vice area adjacent to campus. Renew commercial uses. Develop safety. Clean up and expand. Business growth. Create long term stability Needs a facelift. New businesses. Home improvement theme. Enhance and preser ve density. Mixed-use apartments upstairs. More activity and people Intrusion in the neighborhood. Needs maintenance. OK for other active businesses. Upgrade and improve commercial area Needs development. Reinvest and renew commerial uses Convert Store front repair. > Spruce up Renovate > New use New use New use New use Store fronts in need of repair. > Reuse Redevelop Clear Renovation Reuse Demolish Convert Create Vacant gas station. Explore other commercial use. Franklin/Lafayette needs a bus s top. Housing Rental OK. Duplex potential. Maintenance is a key concern. Redevelop the area. Keep viable commercial area; yet improve the rest of this street. Mixed use; apartments upstairs and commercial down. Improve this area, it could be safer. Farmer’s market Fix parking This space could be developed for office use. Develop this space into a store front. Housing! Several units Revitalize. Commercial or ser vice area, mixed use not just housing. Commercial. Mixed use. Façade renovation. Teen center, workout facility, people friendly area. Get rid of the building all together. Day care center or community resource. Renaissance zone. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 23 Additional Zoning Issues Within this workbook we have covered many of the key elements covered by a zoning ordinance such as the placement of buildings, the location of parking and land uses. Are there any other zoning issues that were not addressed by this workbook that you would like to provide comment on? ___________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Glossary Auto-Oriented: Commercial development along major arterial(s) and in other suburban style shopping centers that gives little recognition to the needs of the pedestrian, cyclist and transit users. Some other characteristics of auto-oriented development include large parking lots located between commercial buildings and the street, signs scale to catch motorist attention and multiple driveway curb cuts that can create safety conf licts. Block Face: The abutting properties on one side of a street between the two nearest intersecting or intercepting streets, or nearest intersecting or intercepting street and railroad right-of-way, unsubdivided land, watercourse or city boundary. Building Articulation/Massing: The size and detail of a building. A large building can be designed in a manner that reduces its apparent bulk by dividing the building into smaller, human-scaled elements. Building Coverage: The amount of land that is “covered” by a building, expressed as a percentage of the total lot area. tially scaled office (with possible first f loor retail) that increase the population density within walking distance of the core(s). Character: The unique character of a neighborhood is derived from the composition and juxtaposition of a variety of elements, including streets, blocks, uses and buildings.. Entry Definition: An entrance is the transition from the exterior to the interior of a building. This “entry” point can be architecturally defined on a building through the use of a pitched roof, varied building materials, stoops, landscaping or other means. Commercial (Land Use): Activity involving the sale of goods and services carried out for profit. Commercial uses may be small scale, such as a corner store, or may be as large as a regional shopping mall and vary in intensity. Other uses typically considered as commercial include: motels, restaurants, department stores, gasoline stations, automobile repair, and dry cleaning. “Cores and Connectors”: A strategy for strengthening Traditional Business Areas by concentrating retail uses in Mixed-Use cores to create shopping destinations linked by connectors of higher density housing and residen- Entry Orientation: The orientation of the primary entrance to a building. Future Land Use Descriptions: The portion of the Master Plan that describes planned land uses and areas for change. The descriptions illustrate what types of land uses are appropriate within a given geographic area, points for consideration, and desired outcomes for the future. Future Land Use Classifications (as used in the Master Plan): • Low Density Residential - An area designated for housing developed at a density of 1 to 4.9 dwelling units/acre. • Medium-Low Density Residential - An area designated for housing developed at a density of 5 to 9.9 dwelling units/acre. • Medium Density Residential - An area designated for housing developed at a density of 10 to 14.9 dwelling units/acre. • High Density Residential - An area designated for housing developed at a density of 15 and more dwelling units per gross acre (14 to 20 units/acre desired with 40 units/acre the absolute maximum). • Commercial - An area designated for retail business or ser vice establishments that supply commodities or perform services. Any activity involving the sale of goods or services carried out for profit, including for example, retail shops, restaurants, hotels, entertainment, offices and a range of personal and professional services. Glossary, continued... • Downtown -The largest, most intensively developed, mixed-use area within the City of Grand Rapids, containing government offices, service uses, professional, cultural, recreational, entertainment, residential, hotel and retail uses. • Office - A sub-category of commercial land use, designated for the conduct of the affairs of a business, profession, service, industry, or government in buildings generally furnished with desk, tables, files and communication equipment. • Industrial - An area designated for the manufacturing, compounding, assemblage or treatment of articles, or materials. • Institutional - An area designated for forprofit and nonprofit, religious or public use, such as a church, library, public or private school or college, hospital; or a government owned or operated building, structure, or land used for public purpose. • Mixed-Use - An area designated for the development of a combination of complementary and integrated uses, such as, but not limited to, residential, office, manufacturing, retail, public or entertainment, in a compact urban form. • Traditional Business Area - Typically located along transit routes, TBA’s area areas designated for a mix of civic and retail uses at street level, with apartments and/or offices on the upper f loors of multi-story buildings. A TBA generally has structures that are built on the front property line and have shared side walls (or are built with minimal side yard setbacks). The buildings are typically 2 -3 stories in height and sit on relatively narrow lots. Off street parking is limited or located to the rear of the building. As a result, TBAs created a human-scale and pedestrian-friendly environment where retail, jobs and services are available within easy walking distance from many homes. • Parks/Greenspace - A tract of land, designed and used by the public for active and passive recreation. Industrial (Land Use): Industrial uses that meet the performance standards, bulk controls and other requirements established in an ordinance. These uses are generally defined in terms of intensity and impact, with light industrial uses being more intensive than most commercial uses, but less intensive than heavy industrial. Lot Width: The dimension of a lot as measured parallel to the frontage line. Land Uses: The purpose to which a parcel of land is being put. Examples of uses include: residential, commercial, industrial and recreational. Master Plan: A comprehensive, long-range guide for future growth and physical development in a community. State enabling act requires a valid zoning ordinance to be based on an adopted master plan. The purpose of the plan is to promote public health, safety and general welfare, as well as quality of life. Materials: Building materials can provide visual entrance and scale to a structure. Materials may include brick, stucco, stone, wood or aluminum siding, etc. Ref lective finishes located at the ground level can detract from pedestrian-oriented areas. Mixed-Use: The combination of different types of land use such as residential, commercial, office, industrial and/or institutional into one building, area or project. Mixed-use redevelopment promotes comprehensive revitalization through retention or addition of housing, services and jobs. Mixed-Use Centers - A mixed-use area that includes: shops, services, offices, restaurants, entertainment, civic and residential uses in buildings that are oriented to the street. Mixeduse cores also include transit stops, public spaces for shared activities, a connected street system that defines small blocks designed for walkability, with linkages to surrounding neighborhoods. A range of housing types for people of different incomes is encouraged. • Neighborhood Mixed-Use Center: A pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use development, located on a transit line, that serves as the focus of a single neighborhood or several neighborhoods. • Village Mixed-Use Center: A pedestrianoriented, mixed-use development, located on a high frequency service transit route, that serves several neighborhoods. • Sub-Regional Center: A pedestrianoriented, mixed-use development, located on a high frequency ser vice or express transit route, that serves a sub-area of the city (several “villages”) and may also serve areas outside the city. Plan Grand Rapids: City of Grand Rapids process to involve the citizens of Grand Rapids in the writing of a new community Master Plan. Residential (Land Use): A building or parcel of land used for housing. This can include detached one-family housing units, or multifamily arrangements including two units; three or more units; apartments, row houses, townhouses, condos, etc. Roof Pitch: The slope of a roof expressed as a ratio of its vertical rise to its horizontal rise. Setback (front): The distance from the front property line to the face of the house. Scale: Refers to how the dimensions of a structure relate to the dimensions of any adjacent structures. Building proportions (length to width to height) should be compatible with surrounding buildings. Building height should be compatible with adjacent structures, especially on the street frontage and at neighborhood edges. The overall form of a building is also important in evaluating the compatibility of new structures. Site Details: Refers to any enhancement, or special features to a site that increases lighting, visibility, aesthete, or security. Site details may include lighting, signs, fencing, screening walls, special paving, or awning can help to create a clear identity, visual interest and a sense of human scale. To be effective in promoting compatibility, the choice of site detail elements and the way in which they are used should be coordinated. Streets and Blocks: The physical structure of a neighborhood is defined by its network of public streets (including alleys). The street pattern can vary from a small-scale grid of streets to curving streets and cul-de-sacs. Transit Oriented Development (TOD): Mixed-use, higher density development centered on existing or new transit lines that are also designed to create an environment that encourages walking and cycling. Transit-oriented development locates people near transit shopping and ser vices to decrease dependence on driving. The purposes of TOD are to reduce the use of single-occupant vehicles by increasing the number of times people walk, bicycle, carpool, vanpool, or take transit. Traditional Business Area (TBA): see definition under Future Land Use Classifications. Traditional Business District: A zoning classification for business districts offering goods and services that meet the daily needs of the neighborhood and other uses that are compatible with adjoining uses. The district’s intent is to protect the traditional character of the business area (i.e. existing commercial structures and lots, including its residential components) and to encourage pedestrian access to and within the business area. Transit: The movement of people by public conveyance in a high occupancy vehicle, including busses, car pool or vanpools, light rail, streetcars and trains. Urban Business District: A zoning classification for a general commercial district that contains uses that are appropriate to the physical design of the existing buildings and are compatible with adjoining uses. The district’s intent is to protect the traditional character of the business area and to encourage pedestrian access to and within the business area. Walkable/walkability: A combination of land use planning and urban design characteristics that allow and encourage walking (and cycling) as an alternative to driving. Zone Grand Rapids: City of Grand Rapids process to involve the citizens of Grand Rapids in the creation of a City Pattern Book to shape the writing of a new zoning ordinance. Zoning: An important tool used in shaping and forming community growth and redevelopment in a manner consistent with the master plan. It regulates various aspects of how land may be used. Zoning Ordinance: A zoning ordinance consists of two parts - the district map and the written text. The text sets out the purposes, uses and district regulations for each district, the standards for special land uses and for general administration. The zoning map graphically illustrates the zones or districts into which all of the land within the community is classified. Zone Grand Rapids • Neighborhood Pattern Work Book • Page 24 This workbook prepared by: Name: Address: E-mail: Project Partners Community partners include The City of Grand Rapids Planning Department, Right Place, Inc., Grand Valley Metro Council, neighborhood and business associations and the Neighborhood Business Specialist Program. Project funders are The City of Grand Rapids, Frey Foundation, Dyer-Ives Foundation, Grand Rapids Community Foundation and Community Development Block Grant funds.
© Copyright 2024