. , Tm F3jj'GCT.:O!J ,.. 4, y! ',,,,..!<: , d'; 3 PROJECTS .,-: fz. :d. .: &a,/9sd) j; I! 8 TABLZ OF CONTDX"T f 5 t: t: ........................................................... I aqr o f 3r.porl;an.t Data. .................. , . , ................... I1 1 ~ ~ 4 ~ n d 2 c H'., A. b i e n BY J. H. wales ... $ 6 ?. OF TKE F L 4 T m RIVER, C A L I F ~ I T U ,OF ROPOSEI) hYDRO-ELECTRIC DETIELORiiSiTS WITH SPECIAL RIiTr7REIICE TO CRSSTji AI?il ROCK CREEK $. . THS j j ' ~ ~ \ ~TI-E y idi3~TWFOX ,LL-.. C...,.7 ._4. I n z' 4 2 - . i ' s i t Ib....~econnendnticns......,.....................,'..~.....III f ~ 9 ~ i b i .1 t1 .. /e ~;+ibit ............. .Ordsy R u t h o r i r i n g I s s u a n c e of License (~ajor) .' * 2 111.. O r d e r .4ut,horiai11g k ~ 3 n d n e n tof i i r t i c l e 13 of License ( l k j o r ) The E f f e c t on t h e Fishery o f t h c North For:: of t k c F c a t h a r R i v e r , C a l i f s r n i a , of Proposzd dro-Slectric Develop?lent~with S p e c i c l ReTereccl: To C r e s t n ar.d Rock Cr.=zl: P r o j e c t s f "I 1. b j 4 f $ The! P r e s e ~ tBi.ologica1 P i c t u r e . . . . . .......................... 4 $ n ~ h Fc u t u r e ~ i o l o ~ i c Pa ilc t u r e . , ...............................6 .,.....,. ;rater Eel.e.-,sss 8 Z lraluzt iort cf Lhs T r o u t F i s h i n g . .....................:, ......lo U. S. F o r e s t Service P i c n i c Grounds.. Residents o f Nesrbp To5ms.. ...... .l2 ..,...............12 ~ e s i d e n t so f t h e North Fork F e s t h e r Rivar Canyan. ;,. ........................ ........12 Revised J d y , 195'1 Second r e v i s i o n June, 1952 4 "-/"i ~t i s t h e p r p o s e of t h i s repol% t q shew ierhat e f f 2 c t ;.i05.d ..-- .L, EL ~ @ E ~ Pof ,s h;r&ro-electric 20xer 6ars ;nd div?rsi.ons on t h e H c r t h Po1.L. o f Fa3.ther 3 i v e r krill have dn fish m d f i . s k k , g in t h a t , st;ra;mo I t $ l o p ~ e n t of h y d r o - n l o c t r i c p f e r usually, if n o t inviiriajl;', P t alters k jr.~-31ved, A t times a l t e r e d w a t e r courses pyovc Genefici.al t,o f i.sh 1 p,?ulations, but i n xiny c z s e s t h e e f Z c c t is detriclcrital. i fiz' . The 4 B i9 "1' P Roclc Creek Dm m d C r e s t a DL? t o g e t h e r u i t h t h e l r c o r i d ~ i t sand 9i;o-r houses a r e vmder c o n s t r u c t i o n on t h e I J o r t k For:; F e ~ t h e rIli.rcr 5;: t h e P a c i f i c Gas snd ~lectrkcCoapanj. as two ns Jar i~r.itsi n t h e i r se-ies " . of seven proposed 7ower units on t h a hiorth For::. E On the ,ptLges iz.nedi?t.>ly' fol3.ov1in~1 r i L 1 be f o m d t h e s m ~ a r yof ?I t 4- t b p r t s n t d a t a and rccorienda',ions, The 2rot;lcn anc! i n v c s t i ~ a t i o ndztc?, P ai-2 p r e s 5 n t e d in Sec5ion I-IV an6 i n S e c t i o n V . ~ L l lb e f o m d an ancilysls i ~f t h e proklen. 6 The ap7endiu s s c t i o n contairs: 1/ 5 I. f 1. S i ! i i i i .tcrldlife .. ... . .S e r v i c e , , . ;report by United Stztes Fish 6: River Basin S e c t i o n , e n t i t i c d . "A 2e;jol-t on F i s h a n d I i i l d - :if e .Resourcas in B e l a t i o n t o t h e \ l a t e r Devel.opment P l n 3 f o r t h e P r o p c s ~ . d ,.. , ~ t i f h P rRiver , . . . . Bssin, Rock CTekli and C r e s t a P r o j e c t s ( ~ o x e rP r o j e c i Fc. 1q62)1t 2/ United. S t a t e s F o r e s t S e r v i c c Report on Feather "niver f o r F e d e r a l Po~czr r, * " ~ i s ~ i o n - j?e~c t~ bo. 1391; 3/ Tables 1,2,_?;Haps 1 ei 2 and F i ~ u r z s1 k 2 0 r 2nd 4/ List of R e f e r -=nces. S U M M A R Y IjMPORTAINT O F D A T A 1. Miles of r i v e r a l t e r e d by Rock Creek and Crests projects16 miles. ' 2, Miles of river t o be k l t e r e d by all p r o j e c t s below Ahanor-56 m i l e s , I !!ccreatioh Use 3. Number of commercial b s o r t s a f f e c t e d by proposed power developnents-ll, , 4* Numbor of Forest developant s--6. S e r v i c e camps a f f e c h d by proposed powar . , A n c l i n ~Use 5. E s t i n a t e d nmber of + g l o r 1946-36,000 days spent on North Fork in 0 ~ 6 , Estimated as minimum rider of t r o u t .caught f r o m North Fork in 1946-108,000, 1 Munber of t r o u t fingerlings fmm hatchery stock planted in 1545--&3 9 m/ I ' 8. Nuznber of resident &@era in P1-s 1949--3 300.. , 9. Number of anglers 194&--25,000 County, 1942;--2,353 f i # h i n g in Pluclas County i.k l!942--14,750 I r I I ~s,ffm~& +A -- 8 10. Calculated catch o f kmut in Plumas C o w in 1942428,000 19@--7ZO~ OOO Il* I Average ((mean) river1 flow 2,710 c e f o ~ e - 28 years a t B i g Bar, C a l i f o r n i a I I 8 s ' p e d e k l Power L;.. 2 f 5 om mission ' ' Washugton, D o C. Gentlemen . . : On March 13, 1947 we wrote t o you making c e r t a i n recon~rnendations f o r t h e r e l e a s e of water f o r f i s h l Q e and r e c r e a t i o n a l purposes in connection with t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f the P a c i f i c Gas & E l e c t r i c Co, f o r a water-power p r o j e c t (Nos 1962) located on North Fork of t h e Feather River' in Butte and P l u m s ~ o u n 6 i s 8 , C d i f o m b , Subsequently, a t our request, you grznted an additional period t o Harch 25, 1947 f o r t h e submission of a d d i t i o n a l recornendationso Discussion of t h e matter with the P a c i f i c Gas & E l e c t r i c Coo during this period has i n d i c a t e d that t h e following modified conditions with r e s p e c t t o f i s h j l i f e would be acceptable t o them f o r incluvfon in the torms of the license, and t h e y would a l i o be s a t i s f a c t o r y t o us in lieu of t h e recommendation made in our l e t t e r of Phrch l.3, 1947,, If t h e Comiission therefore f i n d s these prosent recommendations satisfactoqr f o r h c l u s i o n in t h e license o u r prelrious proposals can be disregardeda, It i s o u r r e c o r n a d a t i o n t h a t t h e l i c e n s e f o r P r o j ~ c tNoo 3962 provide t h e following f o r the support of fish life and f o r r o c r e a t i o n purpos.0~. on t h e Worth Fork ~ e a t h o rRiverp . 1 I A, 1. Immediately below Almanor Dam: E ! 5 (a) i (b) Provide a flow'of n o t less than 1 0 c,f ,s, during t h e winter period (~ovember1 t~ A p r i l 30). $ . fr Provide a flow of not less than 35 c o f , s o during t h e summer period (May 1 t o October 31). -- Note These flows will. result in probably minimum flows immeldiately above Caribou power house of about 60 c,f.s. auring %he s m e r period and 40 c , f , s , during the1 winter period, Ze Lnmediatsly below Rock Creek diversion darn: 1 : (a) Provide a flow of not less than 100 cafes, d u r h g the summer period, . . .. . --.. (b) Provide a flow of not l e s s than. 50 c,f ,so during t h e w i n t e r pprioda (c) Summer flows t o be reduced t o not l e s s than 50 c.f.s. on d q yesrs* . Note -- Those flows will result in probable m i n i m u m sumner flows above Bucks Creek p w e r house of 125 c.f.s, except on dry years when t h e y will reduce t o about 75 c , f , s , above Bucks Creek p l a n t , Bucks Creek plant would add about 200 c . f , s . during t h e summer priod, . 3, Below Csesta dam: (a) Provide a flow o f not l e s s than 50 c,f ,so at all times belaw t h e mouth of Grizzly Creek. I B, Company w i l l advance t h e sum of $40,000 toward t h e construction of two I~roughll f i s h barriers on t h e North Fork of Feather River i f such a r e l a t e r found t o be necessary; one t o be l o c a t e d above t h s mouth of Yellow Creek and tho o t h e r between Bucks Creek and t h e upper end of Cresta Diversion Reservoiro The necessity f o r e i t h e r o r both of t h e s e b a r r i a r s s h a l l be determined during t h e f i r s t t e n y e a r s fo3Uwding t h e commencaments o f operation of Cresta pmj e c t , Co C a m p - Nill provi.de e l e c t r i c f i s h screens a t t h e intakes t o t h e diversion tunrlels f o r t h e Rock Creek and Cresta p r o j e c t s * I D, Coxpany will desigp i t s s t r u c t u r e s f o r t h e r e l e a s e o f t h e flows t o be provided under "At1 so t h a t water will be t a k a f r o m a8 near t o t h o bottom o f the r e s e m i r as i s p r a c t i c a b l e , E, ' : , Company egraes t o cooperate with t h e S t a t e Division o f Water Resources and t h e Division of Fish and Game in t h e establishment of s u i t a b l e c r i t e r i a f o r t h e determination of dry years f o r t h e purpose of fixzing summer water r e l e a s e s under Section A, over 1 The Federal ~ou&.ssion t o ressrve t h e r i g h t t o a d j u s t s a i d r a t e s of flow in.itc;n #A (2) and (3) i f t h e Commission s h a l l f i n d a f t e r n o t i c e t o i n t e k s t e d p a r t i e s and opportunity t o be heard, t h a t t h o r a t e s of floq a r e more than necessarg o r i n s u f f i c i e n t for .such purposes. . . . ., . . m.e , , COPY / power March 25,.19k7 c amiss i o n The ~ n c ~ f Oas i c & Electric Co. has agreed that the preceding conditions and r e q - d m e n t s w i l l be:satisfactory t o than if tiley are a p a r t of t h e license f o r P r o j e c t No. 1962. Yours very truly, . : ACT :LG . EMIL J. N e OTT, J R e Executive D i r e c t o r California Division of Fish and Came ? i ...". O R D E R A U T H O R I Z I N G ?, r., . . . ISSUAElCE OF LI.CEIdSE, . 8 ( M A J O R ) P r o j e c t No, 1962 Exhibit, 2, f r i i Befora )\'elson Lee Smith, C h a h r m ; Clzudo L, Cra~;lsr,a d ~ ~ d s s i o n e:r s Harrington Wimberw, June 17# 1947 I .- In t h e . m a t t e r of ,) ) ) Pacific Gas and E l e c t r i c cornp& ~ r o j a c t ' J J o1962 ~ , ' (1) On January 6, 1947 P a c i f i c ,Gas azid E l e c t r i c Cc~parlg, 04" Scan Francisco, California, f i l e d an a p p l i c a t i o n f o r l i c e m e urrdar t h e Yederal Power Act t o authorizo t h e constrclction, operation, a ~ maintenance d of proposed Rock Creak and Cresta hydro-riloctric davolopments, designated as P r o j e c t No. 1962, on tho North Fork of Feather River, in Butte and Plumas C o w t i e s , C a l i f o m - b , afeecting lmds of t h e United S t a t e s within t h e P l u m s m d Lassen I4ationa.l Forests. . b , (2) The proposed dovelopaents compriSe : (a) The Rock Creek developnent c o n s i s t i n g p r i n c i p a y , of a concrate grzvity d i v e r s i o n dam about 115 f e e t high and abot?t 550 f e e t long, : c r a a t i n g e r e s e r v o i r about 2 m i l e s long w i k b ' a b o u t 2300 acre-foot ,of storage; an.i n t a k e s t r u c t u r e ; a pressure t m i e l &bout 34,503 I feet'.long; a penstock and s w g e chamber; a poirareh?use c o n t a j n h g two ,73,500 horsepower v e r t i c a l F r a n c i s t:lrbins:: each d i r e c t co$ected t o a 03,000 Kva, g*nerator; a subs2;ation; snc\ two . . ...single-circuit 230-Kv, transmission l i n e s each about 500 f e e t long, c o n n e c t h g t o - l i n e s of o r proposed f o r P r o j e c t No. 737* , , , . (b) The Cresta d e v e l o p e n t consisting p r i r , c i p d l y c?f a concrete gravity d i v e r s i o n dam about; 113 f e e t high knd &out 360 f e e t long, c r e a t i n g a r e s e r v o i r about 1 3/4 milea l o n g with a b o u t 2000 acre-feet of s t o r a g e ; y-~i n t a k e s t r u c t u r e ; e p r o o m r e t k e l about 20,000 f e e t long; a penstock end surge chamber; a powerhouse containing two 46,500 horsepo:.rer v b r t i c a l Francis t u r b i n e e each direct-connected t o a. 37$500 Kva, generator; a eubstation; arid I b t CB prJject No. 1952 6/17/47 (coot.) two s i n g l e - c i r c u i t 230-Kv, transmission limes each about 3,500 f e e t long, connecting t o l i n e s of o r proposed f o r ProJect lie, 737* f 4 - - ( 3 ) The a p p l i c a n t o m s and o p e r a t e s t h e following e x i s t i n g p r o j e c t s t. ) L t i $ , li e 1 i: i within t h e North Fork drainage basin: t h o Caribou project, with 49,000 acre-rest of storage, l i c e n s e d as P r o j e c t No. 1352: t h e Bucks Creek p l a n t ~ L t hlO6,OOO acre-feet of storago, l i c e n s e d as P r o j e c t No, 619; t h e Big Bend power plant which is unlicensed, Lake A h a n o r r e s e r v o i r l i c e n s e d as P m j e c t No. 6x6, and t r a n s n i s s i o n line ProJect Noo 737, leading f r o m t h e Bucks Creek p l a n t e Lake A h n o r r e s e r v o i r , whose, water s t o r a g e b e n e f i t s tha Caribou and Big Bend plants, can conserve a l l of t h e water coming down from tho drainage a r e a above t h e o u t l e t and i s designed to be used f o r seasonal s t o r a g e and f o r c y c l i c o r l o n g carry-over s t o r a g e from on9 yeap t o another although it i s not now s o used due t o certain s t r u c t u r a l d e f e c t s in t h e dam. 1 The Secretary of Mar and t h e Chief of Engineers have reported favorably on t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o .! I (4) 5 (5) The Secretary of t h e I n t e r i o r has been requested t o r e p o r t on t h o i i 4 3 *> i application, ( 6 ) The Assistant Secretary of Agriculture f o r t h e S e c r e t a r y of Agriculturw, who has supervision over t h e Plumas and Lzssen National Forests, und t h o Calffornia Division of Fish and Game have each recommended t h a t t h e l i c e n s e contain c e r t a i n conditions f o r t h e protection and support of f i s h life, S i n c e t h o conditions r e c m e d e d a r e g r e a t l y et variance, p r o v i s i o n ' b heroina f t e r mule whereby t h e Commission may h e r e a f t e r prescribe r e a s ~ n s b l oconditions f o r t h e p r o t e c t i o n and support of f i s h l i f e a f t e r consideration of t h e respective conditions of t h e S e c r e t e r y of Agriculture, t h e S e c r e t a r y of t h e I n t e r i o r , and t h e S t a t e of C;lifornitic Commission, ha*g finds t h a t : - considered the a p p l i c a t i o n and t h e record thereon, (7) The applicant i s a corporation organized under t h e laws of t h e S t a t e of C a l i f o r n i a and has s u b n i t t e d s a t i s f a c t o r y evidence of compliance with t h e requirements of a l l a p p l i c a b l e S t a t e la+rs i n s o f a r as necessa~ryLo e f f e c t t h e purposes of a l i c e n s e f o r t h e project. (8) No conPlictFng a p p l i c a t i o n i s before t h e Commission, .. ;rvject No. 1962 (Cont.) ( 9 ) Public n o t i c e lus been given as required by t h e Acta (10) The issuance of a l i c e n s e f o r t h e p r o j e c t , a s h e r e i n a f t e r provided, bhiU n o t intprfere o r be i n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e p y s e s f o r which We Pluruas aqd Lassen National Forests were created o r a c q u i r e d * I The p r o J e c t will. not a f f e c t any Government dam now in existence, nor w i l l the issuance o f a l i c e n s e t h e r e f o r , as h e r e i n a f t e r provided, a f f e c t t h e development of 'any water power resources f o r public pupses which should be undertaken by t h e United States i t s e l f o (12) The p r o j e c t i s b e s t adapted t o a comprehensive plan f o r . t h o improvement u t i l i s t i o n of w a t e r power developm e n t and f o r o t h e r beneficial public uses, including r e c r e a t i o n a l purpoaess (13) For t h e purpose of determining annual charges, t h e horsepower capacity hereinafter authorized t o be i n s t a l l e d in t h e p r o j e c t i s 147,OOO'horsepower a t the Cresta plant, making s t o t a l i n s t a l l e d capacity of 240,000 horsepwer, (U+) The amount of annual charges t o be paid under t h e license f o r t h o purpose of reimbursing the United S t a t e s f o r t h e c o s t s of adiuinistration of Part I of t h e Act, and f o r recompensing t h e United S t a t e s f o r t h e use, occupancy, and on jopent of its lands, i n c l u d i d g transmiosion line r i g h t e f - w a y , i s reasonable as hereinafter fixed and specified, (13) lh accordsnce with Section 10(d) of t h e Act, t h e r a t e o f r e t u ~ nupon t h e net in$sstrssnt in the project and t h e proportion of surplus h r n i n g s t o be paid i n t o and held i n amortization r e s e r v e s ' a r e reasonable as h e r e i n a f t e r specified* (16) The following maps, plans, s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , and statements , f a a d as p a r t of t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o r subsequent t h e r e t o , conform t o the ~ o d s s i o n t sr u l e s and regulations, with t h e exception of Sheets Al and A3 of M i b i t L, t h e approval o f \dlich should bs deferred f o r f u r t h e r consideration of certain d e t a i l s : project No. 1962 (con%. ) I E x h i b i t J: Exhibit; Ii: t 5 L b i % I f E x h i b i t 1C: Exhibit L: Exhibit L: i Exhibit 1 L: Exhibit L: I + Exhibit M: Sheet 4.1 (4014l.F) FPC No, 1962-3. Sheet A l to A 5 (l+01&20l+01.f+2$inclusi\*e) FPC Nos, 1962-17 to 21 i n c l u s i v e Sheet A 6 (401425) FPC No, 1962-7 Sheet A 1 (40126) fPC No, 1 9 6 7 4 Sheet A2 (401427) FPC No, 1962-9 Sheet A 3 (40125) PPC No. 1967-10 Sl~eetshi+ to A9 ir,clwixro (40l429- l+Oll+34h c l ~ ~ s i v ePPC ) No, l962-ll t o 2.6 inclusive Pages 1 t o 3 ir~clnsi-iu It i s ordered t h a t : f (17) A major licens'e be i s s u e d f o r a pePiod of 35 getlrs, (a) The licensee s h a l l &e su* roasocable provisions f o r t h e p r o t e c t i o n and support of f iz11 l i f e and the r e c r e a t i o n a l resourcas o f the Nox-th Fork of Feather River as t h e C o m b s i o n may hereafter p r e s c r i b e a f t e r consideration of t h o recommendations . of t h e S e c r e t a w of Agriculture, t h e Secretary of' t h e Interior, and t h e S t a t e of California, (b) The l i c a m e e s h a l l begin coastruct.i.on of Cresta d e v e l o ~ m e n tnot l a t e r thar; Deceibsr 31, 1947, znd s h a l l complete t h e same not l a t e r t h m July 1, 1950; s h a l l begin construction of the Rock Creek d e v e l o p ment not l s t e r t h a n July 1, 1948, cad shall complete t h e sac n o t later than Julg 1, 1951, e f f e c t i v e as of t h e first dey of t h e ~ o n t hi n wllich it is executed, t o P a c i f i c Gas and Electric Company f o r t h e construetion, operation, m d mainienance of t h e proposed Rock Creek and Cresta dsi-slopxents, subject t o t h e provisiono of t h e F ~ d c r a lPower Act, o ? d t h e d e s and r e g u l a t i o n s thereunder, said licer,:ie t o contain t h e usual conditions and p r o v i s i o n s f o r liconaus issued under S e c t i o n 4 ( 8 ) of t h e a c t f o r such p r o j a c t s and t h e following s p e c i a l con$itions : (18) After t h e f i r s t 20 y&rs of operation of t h o pmjrrct under t h i s l i c e n s e , six (6) percent p e r a n n u s1lall be the s p e c i f i e d rate o f return on t h e n e t investment h t h e p r o j e c t f o r deternining surplus earnings in eccordance with t h e provisions of Section 10 ( d ) of the Act f o r t h e establishaent and maintenance of m o r t i z n t i o n reserves t o be h e l d until t e m i n z t i o n of tho license, o r in t h e d i s c r e t i o n of the Commission, t o bs applied f r o m t h e to . .. -. . !.. ., * time in r e d u c t i o n o'f t h e n e t investment in t h e p r o j e c t , and one-half of a l l s u r p l u s e a r n i n g s in excess o f six (6) p e r c e n t p e r annum r e c e i v e d in a n y c a l e n d a r y e a r s h a l l . be p u t i n t o and h e l d in such a m o r t i z a t i o n r e s -rves. v I ... . (19) S u b j e c t t o t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f S e c t i o n 10 (e) of t h e Act and t h e r u l e s and r e m a t i o n s o f t h e Commission t h e r e u n d e r , t h e l i c e n s e e s h a l l , e f f e c t i v e as o f t h e d a t e of t h e l i c e n s e , pay t o t h e United S t a t e s t h e f o l l o w i n g annual charges: - . < . . , (a) F o r t h e purpose of r e i m b u r s i n g t h e United S t a t e s . f o r t h e c o s t s of administration of P a r t I of t,he Act, one . (I.) c e n t p e r h o r s e h w e r on t h e horsepower c a p ' c i t y a u t h o r i z e d t o be G s t a l l e d by t h i s l i c e n s e (240,000 horsepower), p l u s two and one-half (25) c e n t s per 1,000 kilowatt-hour$ of gross e n e r g y generated by t h e p r o j e c t during t h e f i s c a l year ended June.30 of t h e c a l e n d a r y e a r f o r which t h e charge i s made. A s t a t e m e n t of t h e nunbber of kilowatt-hours g e n e r a t e d in both power p l a n t s d u r i n g t h e s a i d f i s c a l year, c e r t i f i e d under o a t h , s h a l l be f i l e d w i t h t h e C o d s s i o n on o r b e f o r e September 1 . f o l l o w i n g t h e end o f s a i d f i s c a l y e a r ; i 1. i ' 1,. ; i ! ,: iI i ,I : . i. , \ i I ;I : . :i . . (b) F o r t h e purpose of recompensing t h e United S t a t e s f o r t h e use, occupancy, and en jo3-ment o f i t s l a n d s , e x c l u s i v e o f t h o s e used f o r t r a n s m i s s i o n l i n e r i g h t - o f way3 . 1 8 . I I I $474000; . ( c ) For the purpose o f ~ecomp,ensingt h e u n i t e d S t a t 6 5 f o r t h e use, occupincy, and enjoyment of i t s l a n d s f o r t r a n s m i s s i o n l i n e right-of-:iay, $10.64; (20) The maps, plans, s p e c i f i c a t i o n s , and statements r e f erred t o in paragraph (16) above as conforming t o t h e Commission~sr u l e s and r e g u l a t i o n s a r e hereby approved f o r i n c o r p o r a t i o n in t h e l i c e n s e , b u t approval of S h e e t s A 1 and A3 of E-xhibit L i s h e r e b y d e f e r r e d . . . By t h e Commission. . . . .. . . : . : .. . ,. I ; Date of .Issuance: June 17, 1947 . i Leon M, Fuquay, Secretary: ' 1 .. , I , . O R D E R AUTIiORIZING A H E N D M E M T , i . . A , R T I C L E13 O F i- L I C E N S E O F . , , (MAJOR) Project No, 1962 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDEUL POWER. CC)i4MIS ION . Before Nelson Leo Smith, Chairman; Thomas C. Buchanan, Claude L, Eon C, Wallgreil and Harrington Kimberly, ~ ~ ~ ~ i s s i o n eDraper, rs: I ; 1 >; t h e ~ a t t e rof i February 14, 1950 Pm ject Noo 1962 Pacific Gas and E l e c t r i c cornp&y' ) A r t i c l e 13 of Pacific Gas and E l e c t r i c ~ o m ~ a lni c~e n~s es f o r P r o j e c t No. 1762 consisting of t h e Rock Creek and Cresta d e v o l o p e n t s on t h e North Fork of Feather River, C a l i f o r n i a , provides t h a t t h e l i c e n s e e s h a l l make such reasonable provisions f o r t h e p r o t e c t i o n and support of f i s h l i f e and the, r e c r e a t i o n a l reiro~zcesof t h e Nor+th Pork of Feather River as t h e Comission may h e r e a f t e r prescribe a f t e r consideration of t h o recornendations of t h e S e c r e t a r y of Agriculture, t h e Secretary of t h e I n t g r i o r , and t h e S t a t e of CalFfornia. The Division of Fish and G m e , S t a t e of C a l i f o r n i a , has s u b i t t a d certain provisions, h e r e i n a f t e r s e t f o r t h , f o r i n c l u s i o n i n the l i c e n s e f o r P r o j e c t No. 1962 for t h e support of f i s h l i f e and f o r r e c r e a t i o n a l purposes* The l i c e n s e e , t h e Secretary of A g r i c u l t w a , and the Secretary of the I n t e r i o r as h e r e i n a f t e r provided, has each advised t h i s Conmission t h a t t h e provisions proposed by the State fish arid game agency are s a t i s f a c t o r y c The Co;nmiesion orders: I i , { . A r t i c l a 13 of t h e license for P a c i f i c Gas and E l e c t r i c Coinpanyfs Project No, 1962 be amended t o read as follows: i c e 3 . : F o r t h o p r o t e c t i o n a d support o f fish l i f e and the r e c r e a t i o n a l resources of t h e North Fork of F e a t h e r River: Ao The Licensee shall p r o d d e - 1- Imrediat,ely below Almanor Dam: a flow of , n o t l e s s than 35 c , f . s , from May 1 t o October 31 2nd a flow of n o t l e s s t h a n 1 0 c ,f s o from November 1 t o A p r i l 30,; . : 2- Immediately btilori Rock Creek Diversion Dia: . a f l a w o f not l e s s than 100 c,f.s, from May 1 t o October 31, which flow may be reduced t o . I . . not less'than 50 c , f , s , in,dry years; /anda flow of n o t less than 50 c,f,s, ;from November 1 t o A p r i l 30; 3- Below Crosta-. .Dam:- . .a flow of not less than 50 c a f e s , a t all t i n e s below the mouth of Grizzly Creek; B, The Licensee shall d e s i p its s t r u c t u r e s f o r t h e release of t h e flows, provided i n "An above, s o t h a t t h e w a t e r will be t&m from as near t o the bottom of t h e r e s e r v o i r as i n p r a c t i c a b l e and s u i t a b l o c r i t e r i a f o r t h o determination o f d r y years f o r t h e purpose of f 8 t h e May 1 t o October 31 water releases provided in "A1' above s h a l l be ostabliahed by t h e Commission. C, The C ~ m ~ i s s i oreserves n t h e r i g h t t o adjust s a i d ratos of I l o w i n i t a s A ( 2 ) and P1(3), above, i f it shall find, a f t e r n o t i c o t o interested parties and opportunity t o be heard, t h z t t h e rates of flow a r e more t h a n necessary o r i n s u f f i c i e n t f o r such p - m p s e s * D. The Licensee s h a l l provide e l e c t r i c f i s h screens a t t h e intakes to the diversion tunnels f o r the Rock Creek and Cresta p r o j e c t s i f such be found by t h e Commission t o be justifi a b l e ; E, The Licensee s h e l l advance t h e sum of $40,000 toward the c o n s t r u c t i o n of two nrnught1 f i s h barriors on North Fork ? %; % 1 of F o a t h e r River i f such are l a t e r found t o be necessary: one to be l o c a t e d above t h e mouth of Yellow Creek and t h e o t h o r between Bucks Creek and t h e upper end of Cresta Diversion R e s e r w i r , The n e c e s s i t y f o r e i t h e r o r both of t h e s e b a r r i e r s s h a l l be determined during t h e first ten years foUowlng t h e camencement of operation of Cresta pro j e c t e F* The e n t i r e p r o j e c t area s h a l l be open t o free public access f o r f i s h j n g and o t h e r r e c r e a t i o n a l uses, except such portions as may be reserved by t h e Licensee in the i : h t e r e s t of safety, efficient o p r a t i o n and p r o t e c t i o n of pmperty. I i i I Q the Comission, Leon M, Fuquay, Secretary, Date of : ~ i s u a n c e : February 15. 1950 , , . , . . , . . ., . ~ THE EFFECT ON THE FISHERI OF THE NORTH FORK OF THl3 FEATHFR RIVB, CAL,LFOKNIA, ' OF PROPOSZD HYDRO-ELECT2IC DEI'ELOFI.IEIJTS W I T H SPECIAL R E m C E B '4 --= TO C73STA AIdD ROCK CREXK PI1OJ3CTS , . I. INTRODUCTION 1 A ~ l a nf o r d e v e l o p a n t of h y d r o e l e c t r i c power from. run-off w a t e r ' Ln t h e North Fork of t h e F e a t h e r River has been considered by t h e P a c i f i c as e:, and X l e c t r i c Cornpsny f o r many years. The f i r s t of t h e s e r i e s of dams c.~ilteaplatedk r 2 s b u i l t in 1912 a t t h e lower end o f Big Neadows n e m $. ?mituille. iis . It i u p o u ~ d si : r s s e r u o i r of water iihich h a s since been k w n Lnke Almsnor, Water fron ~ a k *ALdanor, i s d i v e r t e d thrbugh a t u n n e l t o B u t t Vzdley r e s e r v o i r , which in t u r n f o r n s t h e f o r e b a y of t h o hydro-electric p d e r p l a n t a t Caribou power house, d:vertccl Water from Lake A h a n o r i s t h u s by t u n n e l t o B u t t Valley r e s e r v o i r and t h e n c e through conduit and ,xnstock t o Caribou power house where i t i s again released i n t o t h e stream 'Jtd of , t h o N o r t h ,Fork about 10 m i l e s below Lake Almanoi- dam. " a iI ' Water r e l e a s e d through Caribou power house t h e n flows unimpeded down t h e ~ o r t hFork channel ' ... f o r a d i s t e n c e of 35 m i l e s t o Big Bend d i v e r s i o n dam. . This dam i s l o c a t e d . kt -, . .., , . t h e lupstr&an end o f "The Big '~kndllof the North Fork of t h e F e a t h e r .. . , ., , , diver and , i t s p u r p s e i s t o d i v e r t water through a t u n n e l conduit and pen\ 3 d o c k s , t o t h e Big Bend power house about 11 m i l e s downstream. The tiro s e c t i o n s o f t h e stream which have a v e r y rcuch reduced flow a t :he Present t h e ar;, the p o r t i o n from ALnanor dam t o t h e c a r i b o u power house and t h e p o r t i o n f ram t h e Big Bend dam t o t h e B i g Bend power house, a t o t a l d i s t a n c e of approximately.21 miles. . . .. . . .. . , T h i s is roughly 33 percent of , , the r i v e r from Almanor dam t o t h e mouth o f t h e North Fork. m e P a c i f i c Gas and E l e c t r i c Compny i s contemplating inrmediata +. 1 8 , , ~ s t r u c t i o n of two nee u n i t s i n t h e i r North Fork. power developinent plan. $. These a r e Rock Creek and t h o Crests p r o j e c t s ( s e e Map #1 and Table #I, i. These two p r o j e c t s kill reduce t h e q u a n t i t y of distances, pp. 2 0 - a ) of water in t h e stream t o a f r a c t i o n of t h e n a t u r a l flow f o r s e v e r a l miles below each d i v e r s i o n d m . Rock Creek power house w i l l be l o c a t e d approx- W t e l y seven m i l e s below Rock Creek dam and C r e s t a power house w i l l be about f o u r m i l e s below i t s d i v e r s i o n dam. The s e c t i o n s of stream between t h e diversion dams and t h e power houses could very w e l l become d r y during k. part of t h e year. Thus, about eleven miles of t h e stream w i l l , upon completion of t h e two new u n i t s , be a l t e r e d by having t h e flow reduced f o r several. months of t h e year. With u l t i m a t e d e v e l o p e n t of t h e company's plan f o r p w e r generation I t h e e n t i r e North Fork from t h e Almanor dam t o t h e Big Bend power house, a distance of about f i f t y - s i x miles w i l l be a l t e r e d . Approximately f o r t y - f o u r and one-half miles of t h e stream channel may be d r y a t . c e r t a i n seasons of t h e y e a r and roughly eleven and one-half miles will be covered L L? by deep pools formed by t h e dams. Along t h e banks of t h e North Fork f o r h o s t of i t s lerigth' runs Highway 24, t h e V e a t h e r River Himay", and t h e main l i n e of t h e Western Pacif ic,Railroa'd. Each o f f e r s t o ti?e t ravsxing public, an o p p r t u n i t F t o vacation in en a r e a of e x c e l l e n t t r o u t f i s h i n g . It i s l e s s than an hourrs d r i v e d o n g t h e highway f o r e a r l y morning and l a t e afternoon t r o u t anglers from O r o v i l l e , Quincy, and o t h e r nearby towns who, f o r various reasons, cannot l e a v e t h e i r d u t i e s f o r more extended v&cation periods. I f 1, 1, 5 ? t / i i ~t t h e p r e s e ~ ttime t h e r e a r e gane f i s h in abundance (rainbow bla~rn trout) in t h e North Fork in t h e s e c t i o n t o be altered by pmposed I i ? derel0p&ntse Several species o f rough fish are also i n h a b i t a n t s of t h e --. I I I I 11. THE PRZSWT BIOLOGICAL PICTURE The North Fork Feather i s , a t present, a p a r t i a l l y regulated r i v e r f l o i ~ g a t t h e r a t e of around 1,500 cubic f e e t per second but with g r e a t f l u c t u z t i o n i n times of s p r i n g runoff and f17o6ds. United S t a t e s Geological Survey records show t h e average discharge'of t h e s t r e a n a t Big Bar s t a t i o n t o bg 2,710 c.f .s. f o r t h e period f r . m 1911 t o 19&, r a t e f o r t h e period was 66,903 c.f.s, which occured on December ll, 1937. The minimum recorded :(regulhted) flow of 235 c.f.8. 1932. Fig, 1, p.22 ; Table 2, p.23 The maximum occured on October 31, shows t h e mean monthly flow frpm 1926 t o 1 9 4 inclusive. The stream gradient between Big Bend dam and Belden i s approximately 43 f e e t per mile. This $3 t h e section in which t h e two power developments, I Cresta and Hock Creek, a r e 'proposed f o r h m e d i a t e construction, and 'where two others, Poe +d Pulga are planned f o r f u t u r e development. North Fork Feather above Selden has a somewhat steeper gradient in t h e s e c t i o n from ~ o c k c r e e kforebay a t Belden t o t h e proposed Belden d i v e r s i. o, n dam e i g h t a i l e s f i r t h e r upstream. The oTy r e s e r v o i r o r ."slack ~ a t e r : ~ ' a pt r e s e n t i n t h e stream above Intake d m i s t h e forebzy of Big Bend po(..erhouss. This r e l a t i v e l y small pool i s formed by t h e Big Bend d i v e r s i o n Dam, I I F i s h e s Present The species of f i s h e s present in t h e North Fork Feather a t t h e present t i n e are: 1. rainbow t r o u t 2. 3, 4. 5. brown t r o u t black bass ( l a r g e & small mouth) suckerrs squawf i s h (sacramento pike) ! : i t 6, 7. \ J hardheads ( a l s o c a l l e d pike) carp bullheads ( c o t t o i d s ) dace 8. j. 9. ! I o r Q r of importance rainbow t r o u t ranks f i r s t and'buown t r o u t . . 5acord a s species most a n g l e r s 6 r e f e r . Black bass a r e not common and. a r e , tkerefore, not considered important by a n g l e r s a t the present time. Rough I b h e s a r e considered by some a n g l e r s a s more o r l e s s o f a r~uisancebecause t b are ~ common i n t h e stream and a r e caught on t r o u t tackile. i r e seldom u t i l i z e d f o r food. Rough f i s h e s L n a t u r a l balance e x i s t s a t t h e present t$me between t r o u t and rough f i s h populations an&. t h e l e s s d e s i r a b l e s p e c i e s I I r e n o t considered t o o harmful t o t r o u t . If, however, stream flow i s g r e a t l y . a reduced f o r s e v e r a l miles of r i v e r t h e n a t u r a l balance becomes u p s e t and c a p e t i t i o n between s p e c i e s may 'cause t h e t r o u t , t o disappear ,from . t h e stream. f i s h have a g r e a t e r t o l e r a n c e f o r t h e t y p e of stream fonned by low 9cu& fiow, i.e. low v e l o c i t i e s , high t e m p e r ~ t u r e s , and l e s s amounts of d i s s o l v e d oxygen. Spawning The F G j i With t h e present s t r e a n fldw in t h e North Fork, n a t u r a l propagation of t r o u t i s providing a n g l e r s w i t h an important part of t h e catch in t h e i r creels and t h e stream i s considered a v e r y good one i n t e r n s of s p a ~ n i n g LvaS i End food production. Trout spawn d u r i n g t h e winter and s p r i n g e Brown t m u t l a y t h e i r eggs in t h e gra\lel in October, November, and December, and I ; I =inbow t r o u t f r o m December t o May. This i s t h e period normally of l o w I t e a ~ e r a t u r e sand high s t r e m flow. I Brave1 during t h e s p r i n g a M begin feedhg it a time when stream food i I The f r y and f i n g e r l i n g s emerge from t h e OrWisms a r e in g r e a t e s t abundance. 111. d 3 r! THI;; FUTURE BIOLOGICAL P I C T U P Z FJhen t h e two power p r o j e c t s , Cresta and Rock Creek, proposed f o r i $ J m e d i a t e consfPuction a r e b u i l t a n d when t h e complete plan f o r power ;" i e flll!L Afl-2 developent on t h e North Fork i s u l t i m a t e l y developed, B+pD E S 5 , P P * T ' ~, The 5 the b i o l o g i c a l " p i c t b e n will be very d i f f e r e n t from t h e present. 5 streax s e c t i o n s between each of t h e diversions and its corresponding I., .f $ pv:erhouse w i l l have only a f r a c t i o n amount a s compared with t h e amowt 7 of the present q u a n t i t y of water, (I > a . #ill have I f 8 This will mean t h a t those s e c t i o n s water with l e s s v e l o c i t y , higher temperditure, and lower oxygen content during a large p o r t i o n of the year. Such conditions are i n e v i t a b l e i i '. Y! i E 5 2 . results of reduced flow. The r e s e r v o i r s formed by t h e diversion dams will form long narrow Cresta r e s e r v o i r w i l l be over t h r e e miles l o n g and Rock Creek pools, i 5 I over two. Their widths will b e about 603-700 f e e t . The surface l a y e r s of t h e . r e s e r v o i r s w i l l have higher temperatures than those prevailing in t , t h e present stream. 6" The deeper l a y e r s should have. c o o l e r water. Fish populations will change markedly. Trout will no longer be able ' t o use, f o r reproduction, t h e sections of stream occupied by r e s e r v o i r s and therefore, a l a r g e per ceht of the' t r o u t spawning a r e a s w i l l be a u t o m a t i c a l l y ! I F u r t h e p o r e , t h e r e s e r v o i r s w i l l provide a much b e t t e r extenn$nated. e n v i r o h e n t f o r t h e d e v e l o p e n t of most of t h e rough f i s h . For ewmple: hardheads (&13r10pharcd3n)are 11poolfl f i s h and develop most r a p i d l y in large . < deep natural pools. Under present conditions t h e balance between pools and f a s t f l o w i n g r i f f l e s i s such'as t o keep t h e population of hardheads < , b -,. t o competition l e v e l s w i t h t r o u t . , . . . . . , 6 Vheh t h a t balance i s upset by ! ..,,,tion of s e v e r a l l a r g e pools.connected by shallow, slow-flowing warm t h e colnpetition between t r o u t and hardheads becomes one-sided f odds favoring t h e developnent of hardheads and t h e c3c',enination of t r o u t . T h i s sarious s i t u a t i o n has developed in Shasta +. .'. . "' ? i 6 5r: . M. WATER ! t t f ELEZASES ln view of t h e i n c r e a s e d t e m p e r a t u r e s which w i l l accoinpany reduced i j i , t r e a flow below e a c h d i v e r s i o n dam o n t h e North Fork, it becomes n e c e s s a r y $ mt,r e l e a s e s b from each impoundment be drawn f roru t.hk'.coolest water p o s s i b l e f u trout i c ,t t h e bottom of t h e r e s e r v o i r s and, t h e r e f o r e , o u t l e t s f o r w a t e r r e l e a s e f should be n e a r t h e bottorc o f t h e dam. !F not 'be s u p p l i e d from skimmer' g a t e s , weirs o r spillway overflow, because t h e L ti' b i f i s h i n g i s t o be maintained in t h e stream. The ccolest water i s Water f o r mir.imm,release should - t m p e r a t t r e of t h e s u r f a c e water l a y e r s w i l l , in a l l p r o b a b i l i t y , be t o o . 1t i high f o r t r o u t t o t o l e r a t e . I about 60°1'. i: The optinlun temperature f o r t r o u t growth i s Rainbow t r o u t can t o l e r a t e h i g h e r i c m p e r a t u r e s f o r s h o r t periods. I f Records a s h i g h a s 8 0 ' ~ . have been t a k e n r h a r e rainbow t r o ~ were t living / I r but such temperature i s v e r y n a a r t h e f 1i (Xeechm, L lin1i.t of t o l e r a n c e f o r t h e s p e c i e s , 1938). .Ina s t u d y of t h e f i s h e s of t h e W i l l a e t t e R i v e r System in Oregon i n : f 1 9 u f i t was observed t h a t no salmonoid f i s h ! i 1 f 1 i k wa3 found w a t e r o f 73'~. o r above but, "rainbow t r o u t , c u t t h r o a t t r o u t , and f i n g e r l i n g chinook salmon in healthy c o n d i t i o n were o b t a i n e d n e a r P e o r i a F e r r y in w a t e r o f 72'~. on . . August 29". It was f u r t h e r s t a t e d , however, t h a t ,"int h e m a j o r i t y o f c a s e s , cut t h r o a t t r o u t , rainbow t r o u t and chinoolc salmon were observed and c o l l e c t e d f i . d u r i n g h u m s t r n d September i n x z t e r s having a t e z p e r z t u r e range o f t 66%'. 3 ( ~ d e r s c o r i nadded) ~ f' i / * TheJ were - -- always l e s s numerous i n w z t e r r a n g i n g from 55 to --t o OF." "The F i s h e s of t h e Wi.ll.amette ~ i v e System r in R e l a t i o n t q pollution^ by R. E. DimicK and Fred l e r r ~ f i e l d , B u l l e t i n S e r i e s No. 20, June, 1945; Engineering Experiment S t a t i o n , Oregon S t a t e College, C o r v a l l i s , Oregon. It i s d i f f i c u l t t o p r e d i c t what t h e s u r f a c e temperatures of psoosed impoundments on t h e North Fork w i l l be, but it i s known t h a t make &anor %OF. on t h e North Fork has surface water temperatures approaching a d Shasta r e s e r v o i r records show temperatures of %OF. It seems ' e I =asonable t o assume t h a t t h e No'kth Fork r e s e r v o i r s which will g i e between' these tvo e l e v a t i o n s w i l l have temperatures a t t h e surface between 80' and It i s lilcewise d i f f i c u l t t o p r e d i c t what t h e stream temperatures below t h e diversion dams will .be. An estimate of what might be expected when the f l o w below t h e dams i s reduced may be made b~ comparison with a s t r e m having t h e same q u a n t i t y of flow. Deer Crosk, a t r i b u t a r y e n t e r i n g t h e Sacramento ~ i v e nr e a r Vina, i s a' stream with a flow of about 103 c , f .s, in s m e r , That i s t h e approximate amount t o be expected below each of t h e diversion dams on t h e North Fork, l a t e mmmr .7 t o Water temperature in Deer C r e e k ' r i s e s 9'~~' while t h e water t r a v e l s from t h e Deer Creek k r i g a t i o n ~ i v e r s ' i o nDam t o t h e Stanford-Vina diversion dam, about- s i x d e s below. Thus, if 100 c.f.s. of water i s released from Eock Creek o r Cresta diversion' dams, a t ab,out 70'~. t h e stream will become u n s u i t a b l e $F I + I i. i f t for t r o u t a few miles below, Itri s , however, a n t i c i p a t e d t h a t water in t h e deeper portions of t h e r e s e r v o i r s w i l l be cooler ,than 70'~. and, there. . fore, the stream should provide s u i t a b l e environment f o r t r o u t f o r most ~f the d i s t a n c e between diversion dams, -. , ...::!$>$G,*"-'~' ,..&' . I I ; *. .. i d. l :. " ..... 3. 5 8. 1. EVA.LUATION OF THE TROUT FISHING g. Destruction of t r o u t f i s h i n g streams i n C a l i f o r n i a by.removal of S f o r power, i r r i g a t i o n and o t h e r purposes i s p r o c e e d b ~ ga t an a c c e l e r a t e d m .;: 4 -,L.fa. * C e r t a i n of t h e s e s t r e a m s a r e p r t i c u l a r l y important. % 7 Their trout- clrrging c a p a c i t y m y be e s p e c i a l l y high, t h e y may be l o c a t e d in e q e c i a l l y d $ .? ~ ~ ~ ~ tsurro7mdings i f u l o r t h e y may b e e a s i l y a c c e s s i b l e t o m i y thousands C 9 r- of ~ p l e . Only a few r i v e r s i n C a l i f o r n i a have a l l o f t h e s e advantages. 1 5 ~f these few, t h e NoAh Fork of t h e F e a t h e r i s an o u t s t a n d i n g exampla, \ I. 3 Z f Yap No. 2 w i t h i t s i n s e r t map shows t h e c e n t r a l l o c a t i o n of t h e F e a t h e r I The m p a l s o shows t h e fanous F e a t h e r River Highway and t h e F e a t h e r Xiver. 1 ! 3iwr Route of t h e brestern P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d o ( s e e P g e 24) 5 t L Not o n l y i s t h e North Fork canyon a p a r t i c u l a r l y f a v o r a b l e r o u t e i 1S 1 A t present t h e F e a t h e r River canyon i s i n a d e q u a t e l y s u p p l i e d w i t h r e s o r t s t a d p u b l i c c m p grounds, 1 a i d i t i o n a l f a c i l l t i s s could be , e q c c t e d which would mzke t h e North Fork o f t k o u g h t h e mountain range b u t i t i s an i d e a l l y l o c a t e d r e c r e a t i o n ground. I:B $ If f i s h i n g could be maintained, c o n s t r u c t i o n o f E t h e Feather even more popular t h a n it i s a t p r e s e n t . ? . .Commercial r e s o r t s on t h e North Fork w i t h i n t h e a r e a t o be a f f e c t e d t 1 .:"k) i , 'i the proposed power developvepts (Almanor dam t o t h e mouth of t h e f j o r t h are l i s t e d below& 1. ~ i l d e n 2. 3. 4. i i Yellori Creelc Inn Gyvrs P l a c e Tobin C o a - r c i a l R e s o r t s on t h e E a s t Branch of t h e North Fork a r e : 5 1. Keddie . . ' > i . . . I . . . . 2, .Rainbow's End F e a t h e r River Hot Springs 3. .: (. i r' ! f be 5, 67.. I' I 1 1, e i II Twain Grays F l n t ill, S t o r e , P.o.) Pine A i r e I . i ~ t e l Jack% P l a c e a t V i r g i l i a I pollowing a r e listed t h e United S t s t e s F o r e s t S e r v i c e Campgromds on t h e North Fork: 13 c m p f a c i l i t i e s 1. Queen Lily 2. North Forl: 3. Belden P u b l i c Camp 4. Indian J3n 5. Gansner Bar 6, H a l l s t e a d F l a t i I k 23 camp f a c i l i t i e s 23 canp f a c i l i t i e s 1 2 camp f z c i l i t i e s Intended t o becoae a t r a i l e r camp. (on E. ranch)-25 camp f a c i l i t i e s An a t t e m p t has been,made t o determine t h e number of a n g l e r s who used Ia E s t i m a t e s were a l s o made of t h e t h e r e s o r t s and cznpgrounds' l i s t e d above. F / n m b e r o f a n g l e r s i r o n nearby c i t i e s who f i s h e d t h e North Fork and a l s o t h e number of fishermen among t h e l o c a l r e s i d e n t s . I I I e s t i m a t e s a r e a l m o s t c e r t a i n l y below t h e a c t u a l numbers. The Bolden R e s o r t a t Belden e s t i m a t e s t h a t t h o p e s t s of t h e r e s o r t ' s p e n t approxinlately 3,000 a n g l e r days on t h e r i v e r and on i t s few t r i b - 1 utaries. 1 t h e area t o be a f f e c t e d by t h e power develo?,ments, f; 1 Ii t. f These f i g u r e s and ' The eld den Resort i s t h e l a r g e s t r s s o r t on t h e ~ o r t hFork w i t h i n Col. J. .W,'M c C r e l l i s , owner of t h e Bsldsn, R e s o r t , also e s t i m a t e d t h a t t h e Yellow Creek Inn, Guy's P l a c e , and Tobin's combined had about t h e same I patronage as that of t h e Belden r e s o r t . l!e, t h e r e f o r e , assums from t h e s e resorts & o t h i k j , 0 0 0 angler days f o r 1946. I n a d d i t i o n t o t h e s e , on t h e North Fork w i t h i n t h e a r e a being considered, f i I i ! ! t h e r e a r e seven r e s o r t s on t h e East Branch o f t h e North Fork (se.e t h e l i s t above and a l s o t h e accompanying maps), The g u e s t s a t t h e s e r e s o r t s spend p a r t of t h e i r angling e f f o r t on t h e N o r t h F o r k proper. . .. .; . . . I.' i A conservative estimate of t h i s time would be 2,500 a n g l e r days. U. S, F o r e s t Service Campgrounds The Plwnas F o r e s t Headquarters a t ~ u i n estimated c ~ t h a_ t_.. during ._ the 1946 season 8,500 campers used; t h e s i x campgrounds i n The average stay.was 5 days per person o r &2,500 Feather River canyon. om days. t h e ' ~ o r t h~ o r k Roughly 50% of t h e c u p e r s were a n g l e r s though t h e s e a n g l e r s probably d i d not f i s h each day, It would be c o n s e r v a t i v s 8 ' t o say t h a t 20,000 angler days were expended by t h e fishermen ,int h i s group. -U. S o Forest Service P i c n i c Grounds .-.. The Plumas Forest Headquarters st Quincy estimated t h a t during 1946 2,500 picnickers used t h e p i c n i c f a c i l i t i e s i n t h e North Fork Feather River canyon. Possibly ode-third of t h e p i c n i c k e r s were a l s o fishermen, making about 800 anglerJdaya. Residents of Nearby Towns ,Between six and seven thousand people. l i v e i n t h e c i t i e s of O r o - ~ i l l o and Quincy which l i e a t e i t h e r end of t h e Feather River area, It, i s onJ_y a 45-miriute drive from e i t h e r 0 r o v i l l e o r Quincy t o t h e n o s t productive sections of t h e North Fork. The number o f a n g l e r s who clrive t o t h o r i v e r and back again t h e sane day cannot be a c c u r a t e l y estimated but 3,000 a n g l e r It was e s t h t e d t h a t on l*!ay 1, 1946 days i s probably very conservative. 2,000 anglers fished t h e North Fork. ---- ~ e s i d e n t s of ' t h e No.rth- Fork Feather R i v e r Canyon It was estimated by J. W. McCrillis of t h e Belden r e s o r t and by t h e S e w i c e in Quincy thst between 600 and 700 people m k e t h s i r homes t h e canyon f o r 3 l a r g e p a r t of t h e year, 12 probably 150 of t h e s e f i s h '. t h e r i v e r f r e q u e n t l y , a c c o ~ m . t , b gfor.roughly 4,000 a n g l e r days. Cate'gory oS Anplers Analer Days Expended V i s i t o r s t o Commercial R e s o r t s 8,500 Visitors t o F o r e s t S e r v i c e Camp Grounds p i c n i c k e r s a t F o r e s t S s r v i c e , P i c n i c Grounds i . , Residents of Nsarby Towns 3,000 Residents of F e a t h e r River Canyon 4,,000 5 i 5: T o t a l Angler Days k i i Values For the plirpose of t h i s :report it would be d e s i r a b l e t o place a monetary value on t h s estimated 36,000 a n g l e r days s p e n t : on t h e North Fork or upon t h e estimeted 108,000 t r o u t caught .* Unfortunately t h i s t;rpe of c a l c u l a t i o n is one of t h e most comp5ex. There are two d i s t j n c t l y , d i f f e r e n t m a t t e r s t o consider in sue11 an evaluation: I . i; . 1. Fishing as a b u s i n e s s s t i m u l a n t , , ' .II, t ' 2. Fishing a s a psychological stirnulant, Obviously t h e first can be assigned monetary v a l u e s t m n though n o fl two persons 'willagree, ! r e c o b i z e d , b u t no one has e v e r been a b l e t o place a s a t i s f a c t o r y value i " .L i tt : i 1t i F i s h 9 g a s a p s y c h o l o g i c a l s t i m u l a n t i s well Estimated 3 t r o u t per angler day. 13 The e f f e c t of t r o u t fishing i n t h e North Fork upon business can be divided i n t o two parts: 1. Increased business r e l a t i n g t o t r a v e l , a, be Increased automobile, s t a g e or r a i l r o a d business. - J Increased food and l ~ g i n gexpenses. 9 c. Increased expendi.tures f o r 3 . m i e s . 1 2. ' Increased s a l e s of angling paraphernalia, ' ! The t a n g i b l e b e n e f i t of t h i s business iqcrease i s l a r g e l y l o c a l but ramifies i n t o a much g r e a t e r zone. Naturally we cannot t a k e t h e e n t i r e l i v i n g ' c o a t s and f i s h i n g gear costs of t h e average fisherman o n t h e North Fork and multiply t h a t by the ranber of a n g l e r s involved anymore than one can teko t h s monetary value.of t h e e l e c t r i c i t y produced a t the North Fork powerhouse without making cornplex modifications. The hydro-electricity produced on the North Fork will have a d e f i n i t e value t o t h e company producing it but it would make l i t t l e d i f f e r e n c e t o the ~onsumers:whet,her i b was generated on some o t h e r r i v e r o r by a steam -I turbine l o c a t e d nearer t h e a r e a of use. Simjlarly, i f t h e r e t~sre,no t r o u t f i s h i n g . o n t h e Feather River, t h e ,anglers and v a c a t i o n i s t s might go t o t h e ocean o r any one of many places f o r t h e i r fishing and ,recreation. The power ccmpany o r t h e l o c a l chamber.of commerce can a s s i g n values t o e l e c t r i c i t y a n d . t o fishing. Such values may appear q u i t e r e a l t o those doing t h e figuring, but t h e y c&ot bear up under c r i t i c a l a ~ ~ a l y s l s , Presmi,ng t h a t t h e r e were roughly 36,000 an'gler days spent on t h e \ . North Fork in 1946,'if f i s h i n g o n t h i s r i v e r were ruined by power d e v e l ~ p merits, could t h e ~ t a G multiply 36,000 by t h e 2$2.0b angling f e e and say i t h a t it had l o s t 872,003 in 1946? Obviously t h i s would b e a g r o s s . ' . 4. f ,:aggeration .e' 8- f o r most of t h e s e a n g l e r s would s i n p l y go elsewhere t o f i s h . They would s t ~ l l ' b u yt h e i r angling l i c e n s e s and i n s t e a d of p a t r o n i z i n g * t h e l o c a l b u s i n e s s houses and r e s o r t s t h e y would spend t h e i r money else- ! i V where in t h e S t a t e , i 2 5 S i m i l a r l y i f t h e proposed power developments on t h e North Fork of 7 C 1 t h e F e a t h e r were r u l e d o u t t h e same e l e c t r i c i t y could and would be PI generated elsewhere, It might work a n a p p r e c i a b l e h a r d s h i p on t h e power $ 1 company .but s i m i l a r l y an a p p r e c i a b l e hardship would be worked on t h o s e 5t seeking r e c r e a t i o n i f t h e North Fork were even p a r t i a l l y r u i n e d f o r t r o u t 1 fishing, , I i I n conclusion, ws claim t h a t it i s impossible t o compare t h e money 3 $ .i involved when h y d r o - e l e c t r i c i t y i s n o t generated on a r i v e r with t h e s noneg involved when f i s h i n g i s impossible on t h a t r i v e r . $ a S If we r u l e o u t t h e cornprison of mon,etary v a l u e s wo have l e f t some f fr i n t o r e s t i n g b u t highly t h e o r e t i c a l consideration^ p t I w i t h a n-tion of people s u f f e r i n g from nervous d i s o r d e r s , a n d t h e 2 s? ' I 5: ? $ + $ . suffering i s becoming i n c r e a s i n g l y acute, could it n o t be s a i d t h a t t h e recreation,al v a l u e of f i s h i n g i s j u s t a s important as i n c r e a s e d business through cheap power. . j . R e. l. a. x.a t i,o_ n through t r o u t f i s h i n g i s widely recognized as being an 5 important remedy f o r t h e nervous s t r a i n of modern l i f e . i < ! r e l a x a t i o n n i g h t be obtained i n o t h e r ways i f t h e North Fork F e a t h e r e t 'Qre ' However, t h i s r u i n e d by coaplete u t i l i z a t i o n of t h e water f o r e l e c t r i c i t y . C, 4 i How o f t e n i s it s a i d t h a t t h e r e l a x a t i o n and t h e s p o r t ' o f t r o u t f i s h i n g , &$ &% a d t h e b e a u t i e s of t h e s e mounta'in streams need n o t be ruined by power C developaents; t h a t t h i s slme e l e c t r i c i t y can be generated a t o n l y slightly FNter c o s t i n s t e m turbines? We recognize h y d r o - e l e c t r i c a l d e v e l o p ~ e n t sas p a r t of our modern b c s ~ e s sworld, we would n o t contend t h c t t h e y should bs abandoned . r ~ p l tyo provide more f i s h i n g bkt r:e do s t r o n g l y believe t h a t , d e F T l o p e n t 3 should not be ,allowed t o completely ruin even one stream o r river. It i s o u r c o n t e n t i o n t h a t t h e r e i s room f o r b o t h power dsvel- and t r o u t . f i s h i n g in t h e $ ~ a . t e r sof Gal-ifornia. Although t h e immediate power developiirnt program ca1.1~f o r o n l y tuo pl&ts ( ~ r e s t aand sock Creek) t h e plan f o r f i v e nair power houses on t h e North Fork has been submitted. The. p r e s e n t e v a l u a t i o n of t r o u t fibhing on this r i v e r would be incomplete if it were t o c o n s i d e r t h e Cresta and Rock Creek developnents a l o n e , I n asking f o r p r o t e c t i o n t o the f i s h and f i s h i n g we must recognize t h a t i t , w i l l be b u t a s h o r t t h e u n t i l t h e remaining t h r e e developaents are undertaken. A t p r e s e n t t h e e n t i r e sixty-two and one-half mile s e c t i o n of t h o North ~ o r k ,from Almanor Dam t o ilts mouth i s t r o u t fishing water, When dl f i v e p a r e r 'plants have been i n s t a l l e d the: n o m l flow of t h i s s e c t i o n Kill be ' a l t e r e d , as f o l l o w s : " ~ i v &bilbw. d i v e r s i o n dams , c o n t a i n i n g o n l y ~ o n t ~ r o l l ewda t e r 'u05 6 ,5 flNormalff r i v e r f l o w Total Miles I Percent, 73% 5'% -6z5-- iki%-- ~ s s u m i n gt h a t t h e r e l e a s e water f l o w below t h e proposed d i v e r s i o n dams (~elden,Rock Creck, Cresta, Pulga, and ~ o e were ) similar t o t h e p r e s e n t . . froru t h e Almanor D m (hhhum 3.2 c. f.s; in 19&!+), how s e r i o u s l y -lease 9 0 * u , t h i s e f f e c t t h e value o f t h e p r e s e n t t r o u t f i s h e r y and t h o p o t e n t i a l fishery? h e t o t h e h i g h l y accessible.-location of t h e North Fork it would be 2 d 5 I: i n e v i t a b l e t h a t w i t h o u t power development it would e v e n t u a l l y become one I of t h e most hezvily f i s h e d t r o u t streams in C a l i f o r n i a , Tho r e c r e a t i o n a l value p f ' t h i s canyon r ~ o u l drani; well up m o n g similar a r e a s i n t h e S t a t e , F 3 i: The b e a u t i e s of t h e Feather Rivar Route have been p u b l i c i z e d t h r o u g h o u t 9. t h u n a t i o n by t h e ' ~ e s t e r nP a c i f i c R a i l r o a d . To a v e r y Largo e x t e n t t h i s r 5 As t h e normal flow "x' r e p u t a t i o n i s due t o t h s beauty o f t h e r i v e r i t s e l f , B ? of t h e r i v e r i s reduced i t s beauty and i t s t r o u t c a r r y i n g c a p a c i t y will be $ reduced. e j Tho g r e a t h r t h e flow of w a t e r , t h e g r e a t e r t h e number o f t r o u t C +, i, it 1 s u p . If t h e r e l e a s e fron t h e s e proposed. d i v e r s i o n dams has 'i f t h e same rainimum as t h a t from Almanor dm, t h e F e a t h e r Iiiver will be t ; ? 5. 3 reduced t o a s e r i e s o f ponds witah them. a-ll knimportznt t r i c k l e of w a t e r between The minimum f1.m from A L I I ~ OdFm , a t p r e s e n t 3.2 c;f. s., w o u l d con- s t i t u t e a madest brook i n surm~mdingsp r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h a t flow, b u t t - :; F when spread o u t o v e r t h e broad, boulder-strewn bed of t h e North Fork it i s scarcely worth consideration. A r i v e r canyon formed t o c a r r y an a v e r a g e C 1. r6: z of about 2,-710 c.f. .. 3. i s b a r e l y wet when c a r r y b g o n l y 3.2 c.f .s. o r even several times t h a t u n o ~ m t . f $ Y i 9 In t h e p ~ t b l i s h e dff19L,6 Anqua1 T r a f f i c Counttt by G. T. McCoy, S t a t e ; Highway Engineer, it w i l l be seen t h a t a t Beldcn Junction-Highwey 21-A, I t h e e a s t bound t r a f f i c k 2 s . a ~follows: i 5 July 1 5 ~ u l y1 6 - 4.87 c a r s - 373 c a r s Sunday gain of 1946 over 1945 , . Eionday gain of 1946 o v e r 1945 Tho no-vial year-by-year J ~ 14Y J u l y 1.5 - - . - 691 c a r s , 581 c a r s ,G7.60$ 73.39% i n c r e a s e in t r a f f i c o v e r t h e F e a t h e r t $ River :highway would. b r i n e a s e v e r a l - f o l d i n c r e a s e i n t h e a n g l i n g p r e s s u r e f i f t h e b o u t c a t c h would k i c r e a s e p r o p o r t i o n s l l y , 5 To meet this i n c r e a s e d i B p r e s s u r e and p r c v i d e t h e i n d r e a s e d c ~ t , c hwould r e q u i r e h e a ~ fa d d i t i o n a l i p l ~ n t i n go f a r t i f i . c i a l l y r e a r e d t r o u t . ; $ t, tiowever, f i s h cannot be p l a n t e d 3I beyond t h e p o i n 5 where t h e volurse of watt and i t s f i s h food s u p p l y w i l l 5 permit. C R e g a r d l e s s of f i s h p l a r l t i n g r~ m m l l flow of w a t e r w i l l o i ~ l ys u p p o r t i a small. number o f f i s h . 1 k i of water r e l e a s e d through the diversion d m s , i It will be s t a t e d t h a t t h e ponds formed by t h e d i v e r s i o n darns w i l l t I; f. i The f u t u r e of t h i s r i v e r depends upon t h e amount produce more f i s h i n g t h a n thc: "nornalfl r i v e r would produce. We b e l i e v e t h a t I n f b c t t h e iinpundrnents might be l e s s @ t h i s woiLd n o t be t11e case. i> productive, mile f o r x i l e because i n sunTer t h e s u r f a c e t e m p e r a t u r e s may ; ;. be t o o h i g h f o r 5 t h e rou$ J 2 5 I iI .I food. , ? Such h i g h t e m p e r a t u r e s czn be e x p e c t e d t o encourage fi3h..'whici7 w i l l f e c d upon b o t h t h e m a l l t r o u t and t h e t r o u t 1s ., . The f o r e g o i n g st.at.en?entAsshould not. be t a k e n t o mean t h a t we f a v o r I ' a d . t h e s b a n d o n ~ e n tof t h e proposed power develdpments on t h i s r i v e r . asSmed It i s by a l l that, h y d r o - e l e c t r i c power p l a n t s a r e - a n e c e s s a r y p a r t of Our b a s i n e s i d e v e l o p ~ e i t b u t it i s a l s o a s s u r e d t h a t t h e r e must b e a cozpromise , )"""c' .,-- ., . ....,.&i"' , .iTC' ' .- .;::...... :. ' '-+A:,: , ; : %. -< aP ' ' :" ~$. C 2 '.... . . L 8 hetween t h e power cornpa-qies end t h e fishermen. How much w a t e r can t h e 6 .y .cr r E 3 , ~m c h t r o u t f i s h i n g can t h e 'people of t h e S k t e a f f o r d ' t o have them .r: company a f f o r d t o r e l e s s ? below i t s d i v e r s i o n d a m bn t h e ltortll Fork? if X .S; s ~sstroy? D 3 g + .J. s: 1- ? 6 .s. 19 5, $ 9 g $ -" f sr 3 F I < 2 . . . -1 it APPZND 'UI Content of h p p e n d i ~ , Map NO, l o ~ ~ r o o ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ o o c ~ o ~ ~ ~ o 0 e Table No, 1 ( ~ o r t hFork F e a t h e r R i v e r ) Breakdohn o f D i s t a n c e s Between ExisGing and P r o p s e d Poxer Dc.velopents.;lll . t Figure No. 1- Mean Monthly R ~ q o f f ,North Fork F e a t h e r River st Big Bar ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e e o ~ ~ 4 4 . Table No, 2- Fean h b n t h l y Discharges ia Cubic F e e t P e r Second, North Fork E e e t h e r E i v e r , Big B a r , C a l i f o r ~ i a , ., ,,23 . Map No, Z... ! .o...,.4...,..o.........,.......,.............~...~ F i g u r e No. 2- Runoff i n Acre F e e t in Morth E'ork F c ~ t h e r EZiv~ra t h a n o r D a n and Big Bar,, , , ,26 ...................... Table No. 3 Annual Runoff i n Acre Feet i n F!orth Fork F e a t h e r River............,..... ............................25 i I Report Noo 1- United S t e t e s Department o f t h e I n t e r i o r llA r e p o r t on f i s h and w i l d l i f e r e s o u r c e s i n r e l a t i o n *\ 'to t h e Water P e v e l o p e n t P l a n f o r t!le Proposed Feather R i v e r Basin, Rock C r e e k and Crests P r o j e c t s u (Power P r o j e c t No. 1962). ................................. .27 Report No. 2- "Report t o T h e F e d c r s l Power Conlmission on t h e A p p l i c a t i o n of t h e P a c i f i c Gas and Z l s c t r i c Company f o r a P r e l i m i n a r y P e r n i t f o r t h e North Fork Feather R i v e r P r o j e c t No. 1391 C a l i f o r n i a w i t h i n t h e Lassen and Plmss N a t i o n d l For.asts '1.. - ..................2S 0 TABU X0. I NORTH 'FORK F'EATliER RIVE,?I Breakdown of Distances Between E r d s t i n g and Proposed Power D e v e l o ~ n e n t s WA?'E;R LOCATION ! 0 ' Almanor darn ; FUTUIE CONDITIONS 0 , : 10.0 ! C o n t r o l Flow 'Caribou power./house 10;0 Head of Belden r e s e r v o i r 0 11.0 Belden d i v e r s i o n dart 1 Reservoir Control Flow Belden power house s i t e . Head of Rock Creek r e s e r v o i r Rock Creek Diversion dam Rock c r e e k power house s i t e Reservoir Control Flow * Head of C r e s t a r e s e r v o i r Cresta power house s i t e Colitrol Flow , . I I,. . Reservoir . Head of Yule r e s e r v o i r . I , Cresta d i v e r s i o n dam .".: .<l ' . ":~- : 3605 ' 40*5 ; -45.0 Pulga d i v e r s i o n dam 1.5 Reservoir Pulga power house s i t e 5 Control Flow Poe diversion dam Reservoir Poe power house Control Flow Big Bond d i v e r s i o n dam 3.1 Reservoir 56.0 Big Bond power house 11 Control Flow 62.5 Mouth of North Fork F e a t h e r 6*5 6Ze5 TOTAL ' I S U I P ~ ~ R OF Y RrVER TYPE-S BETTPESN ALSIYdOR DAM AND OF NORTH FORK Control flow below diversion dvns Reservoir t r a t e r Normal r i v e r flow TOTAL 44.5 1 1 05 4.5 62.5 m i l e s Normal r i v e r flow MEAN MONTHLY RUNOFF .... -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ....... ..... TABLE NO. 2 - - . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . , . ........... ........... im . ~~CNTHLY DISCWLGES w CUBIC F ~ PEP. T SECOND . . NOR@ FORK ~ j ; ' i T m B RIVSR, B I G BAR, CALIFOF3 Dl October November Deceaber..... January February liarch J una J ~ Y August September Minimum Maximm 924 1070 :29500 4490 950 84.40 448 '6300 23 5 2940 890 5700 917 355 25000 8630 259 50900 620 1280 28400 31500 1270 24500 765 6290 i?tG ANNUAL RUNOFF IN A C E 3 FZZT IN NORTH POBK, FEATHE3 RIVER : 1000 acre f e e t Unit P e r c e n t release ~ ~ d ~ f \ ! a t e r Y e a rC a g e a k b k e ~ s p t ,30 Almanor Dam I ? : : n" i F @a c,f.s. (2F91+.5 acre f t . 5 g I 2 5 f 2 i f 1 k ! i t a # ti 5 t, :: 8 5 i P i. g t i j i r I L I f 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 19U 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1926 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 193 5 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 19W 1942 1943 194.4 1945 93183 1227.5 69109 985.6 757.1 P 861+,1 I per year) 2,O 3.6 2.5 3.3 2.9 4.8 1 1311,6 ,p 3166.5 12506.7 P d614.7 ,2kL6* 0 U-$3e 0 1852,8 1288.2 P 1306.5 2412.1. lb62.8 802.5 1423.6 1622.8 2448 6 1767.2 1-333.5 P 1740.5 1316.8 '967.1 1119,7 1820.5 2168.5 1469.1 3.1, 2.8 2.8 3.3, Lo 5 401 50 3 -4 3 7 4.5 5.7 5.6 k*8 , 8.2 6.5 3.3 5.3 4.2 I 909 ' 1 / I 207 +., 4.3 0 . @ 50 cof.s, (36190, a c r e f t . 2.7 527.2 588,O 8W e 5 $9702 904 4 778 9 567 0 61.3 .4 510 o 5 734.1 680.8 556.8 4.40.8 455.7 524 1 308*5 387.7 768.7 47'7.1 608.1 254.3 278.1 40'7.4 520.0 565.2 427.9 1131.2 542.2 655.6 79100 803,8 785.1 6u.1 5100 7 Ga ae P e r cent r e l e a s e per year) I T 9ig Bar 9.1 6.2 4.8 4.5 5.9 1.1 1.k 104 5 2.4 1 0 1-9 2.8 1-9 1,5 2.2 4.5 20 5 2.2 1.5 8.2 2.7 2,l '4. 2.7 3.7 362 2.0 1,6 2-4 2.2 4.7 3.7 3.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 5- 0 ',, 2737.6 3201.7 3295 8 2832,3 1599.1 179'7.8 . 1*3 1.1 1,1 i&3 2.3 2,O 1 i 1 1 ".. Note: P - Partial record, --percent i s somewhat above actual. The pelease a t each gaging station would have been t h e amount of water Provided f o r f i s h p r 6 t e c t l o n expressed as e r c e n t a g e o f t h e t o t a l annu31 r u n ~ ~ f fif , the two p r o j e c t s , Hock Creek ang Crest,, had been m o p 9 r a t ~ o n d u r i h z t h e a e r i o d f r o m 1906 t n l Q 1 C rnF'0RT NO, 1 liillIT%D STATES DEPAR'MEhTT OF TKE INTEFlIOR . Fish nncl W i l d l i f e Service River Basin Studies Portland 18, Oregon . A ~ o - p o r ton ' Fish aqd WilLZFfe Resources in R e l a t i o n t o t h e Water Dsvelopent Plan f o r t h e p r o p ~ s o dFoather River asi in, Rock Creel: and Crasta P r o j e c t s (power pro jcc'$ No. 1962)y Pacific Gas and ~ l e c t r i hGem-, Calif0 rnia Sponsar i S p n s o r ' e S t a t u s of P r o j e c t : Tho projoct i s i n planning stage, Plan f o r same has beon s u b i t t e d t o t h e Fedoral Power Commission, Loczt i o n : Butte and Plumas .Counties, California Source of EYl@nserhg Data : P a c i f i c Gas and E l e c t r i c Company, Application to F e d e r a l Power Coinrniss i o n for License f o r Power P r o j e c t No, 1962. F i e l d Izlvestigat i o n : [email protected], l a r c h , end April, 11947, t Report Prapared. &/ 19470 Reviqod December, 1947 R e v i ~ e dFebruary, 1948. : May, Fiold work and r e p r t by River Besin Studies Staff, F i s h and WiadlFfe S e r v i c e , Region one, P o r t l a t d , Oregono cr\ The present a p p l i c a t i o n of t h e Pacific Gas aizd U o c t r i c Conlpany (prder Project No. 1962) p r o p s o s t h e developxent of two w r i t s (Rock creek and ~ r e s t a )of a coaprehensive plan t h a t will f u l l y u t i l i z e t h e h o w and gradient o f U o d h Fork of Feathar River f o r t h a production of hydro-electric power, T h e e n t i r e plan i?cludes t e n units exclusive of Lake Almanor. Three units,, Caribou, Buck's Creek, and Big Bend, have been constructed and are in operation; two, Rock Creek and Cresta, a r e prop3sed f o r present c o n s W c t i o n ; and f i v e , BuW Valley, Caribou Addition, Belden, Pulga, and Poe a r e proposed f o r .future construction, completion of a l l of t h e u n i t s of the plan w n i place t h e e n t i r e flow .of North Fork in t u n n e l s and conduits, except f o r diversion dam forebays, flood s p i l l , m d midbr contributions of t r i b u t a r y inflow, It i s of t h e g r e a t e s t importance t o t h e valuable f i s h e r y resources of North Fork and t o i t s genoral r e c r e a t i o n a l a t t r a c t i v e n e s s as w o U , t h a t t h e present a p p l i c a t i o n be considered n o t only on i t s own merit, but a l s o in terms of t h e ultimate d e v e l o p e n t of t h e e n t i r e streamo ~ e c i s i o n st h a t a r e made a t t h i s time i n considoration of t h e Rock Creek and Cresta P r o j e c t s w i l l unquestionably e s t a b l i s h precedent f o r a l l subsequent units of t h e comprehensive plan of d e v e l o p e n t a s proposed by t h e sponsor, In i t s present application, t h e sponsor makes no provieion whatsoever f o r mlninurn flews f o r t h e p r o t e c t i o n and nczintenance of fish life in North Fork, The qnly flow that would r w a i n in 1203 miles of North Fork k.'o.dd be minute q u a n t i t i e s of inflow fron t r i b u t a r i e s , unknown, but s l i g h t amount r e s u l t i n g from leakage around t h o dams, ard floocl s p i l l s of s h o r t duration during periods of h s a ~ yrun-off, T h i a condition wo7dd virtually e l h i s a t e p r e s e ~ tf i s h populations i n t h i s s e c t i o n of North Fork f o r all time, The power p o t e n t i a l and f i s h e r y resources of t h e stream ara t h e property of t h e people of t h e S t a t e of California s p e c i f i c a l l y and of t h o United S t a t e s generally, These m d a l l other resources t h a t might be involved i n any h a t e r development plan must be considered befora making f a r - r e a c h h g decisions i n favor of c e r t a i n b e n e f i c i a r i e s who would p r o f i t thereby* The S t a t e of C a l i f o r n i a Division of Fish and Game estimated t h a t in 1946, 36,000 a n g l e r 4 s y s w e r e spent on North Fork of Feather River, and t.hat a minimum of 108,,000 t r o u t were caug'i'ht* The Division furt,her conmentod t h a t t h e s t r e m i h a d long been recognized a s an outstandinl: t r o u t stream end t h a t d e s t r u c t i o n of any appreciable amount of it w o u l d have far-reaching conse~~uences,The C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e Chmber of Conmercs estimates t h e annul average expenditure of a California a ~ g l e r t o be $120, E s t i m t e s made by t h e Division of F i s h and Gune, based on caich records, i n d i c a t e t h a t a n z l s r s average 10-12 f i s h i n g days p e r y e a r which would place t h e per day expenditure a t about $10, On t h e basis of these estimates, Ithe value of t h e f i s h e r y resources of North Fork is s u f f i c i e n t l y h i g h t o warrapt t h e expenditure of $360,000009 annually by anglers t o f i s h it, .. :I: The above es'cinatos e.pply t o 35,85 miles of North ~ o r kfrom Lake A h a n o r do-mstrem t o t h e s i t e of t h e proposed Cresta powerhousa, Op2ration of t,lle Rock, Creak and Cresta p r o j ~ c t sw i l l aiff e c t t h e lower 1'6.55 miles of t h i s s e c t i o n , The e s t i n a t e d a n n d f i s h e r y value of t h e s e a f f e c t e d sections ( $ 3 1 . 5 # ~i)s based on a p e r second-foot-mile value of approximately $50 as c a l c u l a t e d from t h e t o t a l second-foot-miles f r m L&e -or t o tllo proposed Cresta Pc\b;erhouso, Under t h e plan a s propiosed by t h e sponsor, this value ~mubdbe reduced t o $33,000 g r e a t e r than t:hooo based on tho sponsorrs plan but would be a t l e a s t $155,000 less t$m under p r e s a r ~ tconditions 6 .- .. j 9. :.: :jt ,:I .i ::$ , 1-1 i, T . ,... , . .,.:.. < .& f !I I . . f; . Construc$j.on of t h e proposed p r o j e c t as p r e s e n t l y plannod would result i n vlnual l o a s a s t o t h e f i s h s l y resources of t h e Norbh Fork of Feather River of ap~ro.'rinatsly$280,030. If Recomendations l a and l b a r e followed, t h o n e t a n n u d l o s s w a d d be $155,003, Partial. compsnsation f o r t h i s l o s a would be p o s s i b l e through provision of g r e a t a r r e l e a s e s from Almanor Dam t o provide flows suggested in Recommendation lc, The annual f i s h e r y valuc frorn L&e Almmor t o Rock Creek Reservoir would thus be increased by $B5,0GO, The n e t annual l o s s f o r t h e e n t i r e stream would be reduced t o $70,000, I It i s requested t h a t t h e Fish and b l d l i f e Service be advised o f all changes in c c n s t r t ~ c t i o nar-d' o p s r a t i o r u l plans so t h a t ,a reconsideration of t h e e f f e c t s m y be made, j 5 :: ! ;' . .:. ".-i. RECO?+ENDATIONS <', , i , t ?, :. ;: <I ; i: ; 4( 1 ; !, . . It i s racommended t h a t : (1) Min5nm flow3 be maintained st all times in s e c t i o n s of ,North Fork as follows: .. a, Hot l e s s t h r n 200 second-feet in the' 7.:5-mile s e c t i o n from Rock Creek Dam t o t h e head of Cresta forebay t o be measured a t t h e point of r e l e a s e from t h o damo Z I. ' E ; I d I I ;a t b, Not less than 200 second-feet in t h e ,!+,$-mile s s c t i o n from Crestn Dam t o Cresta powerhouse t a i l r a c s t o be measured a t the point of r e l e a s e from t h e dam, i n t h e l0.0-mile s e c t i o n from L L ~ OA h w r Dam t o Caribou powerhouse t a i l r a c e , t h e flow t o be released from Lako A h a n o r and measured a t a point z p p r o r d m t e l y 0 0 5 m i l e upstream f r m t h e Caribou p l a n t o c, Mot l e s s th-an 100 second-feet (2) A minimum flow of n o t l e s s t h a n 200 second-feet be establ i s h e d a s a prt of any l i c e n s e t h a t may be granted t o t h e P a c i f i c Gas and E l e c t r i c Company f o r construction of any p r o j e c t on t h e main stem of Worth Forlc of Feather River, (3) Rock Creek and Cresta dam be constructed with o u t l e t f a c i l i t i e s Located as low a s possible t o a s s u r e t h e r e l e a s e of cool water f o r f i s h l i f e , a (4) Further s t u d y be given t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of c o n s t r u c t h g an a f t c r b a y dam t o smooth flow i r r e g u l a r i t i e s occasioned by t h e o p r a t i o n of Caribou power p l a n t on North Fork. (5) The lice113e f o r t h e project, i f granted, be held open with respect t o t h e p m b l m of screening t h e intakes of d i v e r s i o n s frcw Rock Creek and Cmata Damso The j u s t i f i c a t i o n f o r screens cannot be adequately determined u n t i l t h e proJect i s in operation, ( 6 ) The e n t i r e p r o j e c t area be open t o f r e e public access f o r f i s h i n g and o t h e r r e c r e a t i o n a l uses, except such v r t i o n s as may be reserved by t h e P a c i f i c Gas and E l e c t r i c Company in t h e i n t e m s t of safety, e f f i c i e n t o p r s t i o n , and p r o t e c t i o n of p m p r t y . 1, The California Division of F i s h and Game a s s i s t e d in f i e l d work and supplied data pertinent t o this report, 2 , O f f i c i a l s of t h e U, S , Forest Service supplied certain d a t a and i n ' f o m t i o n and concurred h t h e recommenclations made h e r e i n , 3. The Federal Power Commission furnished engineering data, maps, and o t h e r information, . ~ d ? E ? A IDESCRIPTION , OF THE:'PFIOfiCT' . , I +!,, ,Feather River r i s e s near t h e c r e s t of t h e Cascade Range and i t s channel a p p r o r a t e s t h e b u n d a r y between t h a t range and t h e Sierra lqevada. It flows in a general southwesterly d i r e c t ion joining t h e main stem of Sacramento Hiver about 1 5 miles northwest of Sacrmento, Calif o r n i a , The p r o j e c t stroam, North Fork, regarded as a continuation o f t h e main stream, r i s e s on t h e southern s l o p e of Lzssen Peak ( e l e v a t i o n 10,437 f c c t ) and f o r t h e g r e a t e r length of i t s course, flows thmugh a deep, narrow canyon j o i n i n g Middle Fork a t e l e v a t i o n 250 f e e t @ Its d r a i n a g e area i s epprw3mately 2,230 square m i l e s e Flow i s regulated by Lake A h a n o r and by t h e operation of Caribou, Buck's Creek, and Big Bend power p l m t s , e x i s t i n g u n i t s of t h e P a c i f i c Gas and E l e c t r i c Company, 5 , Tho present a p p l i c a t i o n of the power cornwy propee3 the developlent of two u n i t s (Rock Creek and Ccestn) of a conprtii~nuivo plan t h a t w i l l fully u t i l i z e t h e flow and g r a d i m t of North Fori;.for t h e production of hydro-eqectric power, Completiori of a l l u n i t s of the plan (see mep) v d . 1 place t h e flow of North Fork in t m e l s and conduits, except f o r d i v e r s i o n dam forebays, frcm Lake klniarior t o Hidd l e Fork* 6. In t h e Roclc Creek U n i t o t h e applicant proposes construction of a concrate dam 115 f e e t high and 550 f e e t l o n g t o be l o c a t e d on ~ o r t hFork ;immediately below t h e confluencez of Opopeo in Ltlo M w ~ of m$ of Section 35, Toknshsp 25 North, Range 6 E a s t , Mount Diab3.o Ease and Heridian. A 31%foot, overflow-type spillway 315 f e e t long with g ~ a p a c i t yof 120,000 second-feet controlled by 3 d m gatss, 105 f c e t by 22 foet, would be provided, Two s l u i c e gates, 7x7 f e e t p located at almost stream lovel, would a l s o be p . ~ ~ d e d a s t of thr, d m and 7* Water would be d i v e r t e d fmrn t h e n o r t h ~ \ ~ i ~end c a r r i e d 34,500 f e e t by means of a 26-foot diameter tunnel having 8 capacity of 3,000 second-lpet (average 1,560 sscond-feet) t o t h e head of t h e penstoclrc TheDpenstock muld c o n s i s t of 800 f e e t of 2.0-foot diameter tunnel and 800 f e e t of 162 t o 192-inch diameter pipa leadjng t o t h e power house, Power plant would c o n s i s t of: a steel r.erirforcod concr&e b u i l d h g , 54 x 166 f e a t , having an abutting ewitcllhouss, 30 x U+6 f e e t , This plant'would be equipped with 2 v a r t i c d , F r a n c i s t u r b i n e s , each d i r e c t l y connected with a 3-phase, 60-cycle, 13,800 volt, 0,9 f a c t o r , 63,000 kva generator, The p w o r plant would be l o c a t e d about 7,5 miles below the dam, I 8. The forebay wouldjhave a capacity af 2,300 acre-feat and Llna surface a r e a at n o m l o p e r a t i n g pool l e v e l would be 122 acres inundating 2,8 miles of stream, 9 , For t h e Cresta u n i t p t h e applicant p r o p s e s ~ o n s t r u c ~ i oofn a concrete darn 113 f e e t high i h a v h g a c r e s t l e n g t h o f 369 f c e t , An overflow, 124,000-second-f oo t capacity spillway 132 f e o t , ' l o n g w o u l d be proiided and c o n t r o l l e d by 2 wheel gates, 50 x 50 f e e t , and 2 d-rum gates, 16 x-50 f e e t . Three s l u i c e gates, 7 x 7 f e e t , l o c a t e d a t about stream l e v e l would be provided, The dem w ~ u l dbs l o c a t e d a short d s t m c e downstream f r o m Swm;, Creek in t h e 143& ,of sW& of S e c t i o n 1, Township 23 No~%h,Range 5 East, 14ount Diablo Base and Weridienf 10. Water would be divex-ted froin t h e south end 01 t h e dm &=d carried through a 2'7-foot d h e t e r , 3,500-second-foot (averagd 1,830 second-feet) capacity tunnel and thmugh a penstock consist in^ of 700 f e e t of *foot diametsr t u n n e l and 700 f c e t , o f 174 t o 198-inch d i m a t o r pipe t o t h e powerhouse, The power plant would be l o c a t e d about 4,8 miles below t h e dam i n Section 27, To7mship 23 North, Rang3 5 East, Mount Diablo Baso and Meridian,, Building would br of i d e z t i c a l s i c 0 and similar construction as'the Rock Creak plant, but (would be prouidad with two 46,500 horsepower, I v e r t i c a l , Francis t u r b i n e s p hach d i r a c t l g connected t o a 3-phase, 60-cycle, 13,800-volt, 0.9 power factor, 37,500 k-sa generator, t - $ t ? t llB C m s t a forebay would have a czpacity of 2,000 acre-feet and a surface area of 97 a c r e s a t norrual. o p e r e t i n g pool l e v e l ~ n d would . bundate le75 m i l e s of Worth Fork, 3. F,: F1SW.Y SECT U j N 5 eo 1- 12e The project, asiproposed by tho sponsor, tr.~i!ces no provisioo fbr mininum flows f o r t h e m i n t e n a n c e of f i s h l i f e in s s c t i o n s 0% North Fork below Rock Cree.!! and Cro3ta dams mounting t o R t o t d of 12,3 miles of streamd In addition, forebays of t h o s e dams w i l l inundate 4a55 miles of stream, making a t o t a l of 16eB5 m f l o s t h a t ill bs affected by ~ j t h e p r o j e c t o This l.arge sectior, of s t r e a n supports a s p o r t f i s h ~ of considerable magnitude and includes t h e nost picturesque s e c t i o n of North Fork, On t h e b a s i s of estimates made by t h e C a l i f o r a i a Division of Fish and Game i n 1946, t h e annual angler e f f o r t on these s e c t i o n s would be appro-tsly 31,500 angler days, Rainbow and brown t r o u t aro t h e p r i n c i p a l s p e c i e s of game f i s h in t h e a f f e c t e d s e c t i o n of stroaljl although smallmouth black bass and occasionaLly chinook salmon are takon h :i f1' hi 1f ? S 1 1 Df li P r e p r o j e c t evaluation. s e c t i o n s of North Fork below t h e p r o j e c t . a r e a o The Division s s t h a t e s by anglers in 1946'J-n North Fork, - t h a t a minimum of 108,000 t r o u t were caught E 13. The C a l i f o m i e S t a t e Chmbsr of Comerce (uC'alifoxmia'' Vol, IiXhT, No, 2, Febo 1945) estimates t h e average annual eqer,dj.tlue of a c ths C a l i f o r n i a a n g l e r a t $120, Estimates based on catch records r ~ ~ a dby Division of Fish and G a e ' i n d i c a t e t h a t anglers averazs 10-12 f i s h h g days par year o r about $10 par day, i a" U+, On t h e b a s i s of tho above e s t k t o s , a ~ l g l e r sspent a p p r o r h t o l y $315,000 in p u r s u i t of fishing on llorth Fork of F a s t h e r River i n 1946, 1 ! ?. 1 5 a The prepro j e c t annual value of t h e fishery r e s o ~ i c s sof t h e s e s e c t i o n s is, theraforc, concludsd t o be $315,000, The 16,,85miles of stream involved in t h e p r o j e c t plan are r e a d i l y accessib2c t o a g l e r s m d support t h e bulk of t h e e x i s t i n g r e c r e a t i o n a l f a c i l i t i e s * The g r e a t o r p a r t of t h e t o t a l an&er s f f o r t on North Fork i o expended in this s e c t i o n * r;P B* P o s t p r o j e c t evaluation,, 5 : ! . . . 16r The meqn minimu2 flow o f North Fork t h r o u g h t h e p s o j o c t area is apprbximately 1,500 second-feet, although flows oS l e s s t k m 600 second-feet have been recorded a t the Big Bar gaging s t a t i o n o With t h e p r o j e c t in o p e r a t i o c as planned by tha sponsor, t h e only flow below Rock Creek and Cresta dans would be t h a t r e s u l t i c g froa lezkage, flood s p i l l , a d inflow of t r i b u t a r i e s * Mhir;..u.a t r i b u t a r y W l c i r tdo t h e 7D5mile s e c t i o n between Rock Crsek dam and Cresta Eorobay i s 1 7 second-feet and i n t h e 4e8-miLt3 section between Cresta dam and powerhcuse U,5 sscondfeete The e x t e n t t h a t leakage would supplment t h % e flows i s u-rknowi-i, but q u i t s obviously t h e t o t & dnirnu;n flow from thesa souY1cas would be inadequate t o maintain more than a v e s t i g e , o f t h e prevent f i s h e r g , * - 17* On t h e basis of t h e s e flows as compared t o t h o s e p r e u z i l i n g a t t h e p r e p m j e c t l e v e l , it i s estimated t h a t f i s h e r y values would be about 89 p e r cent and would amount t o approximately $35,000 amually including a. f i s h e r y value of $2,450 f o r t h s forebays of Bock Creek arid 'Cresta D a s , A n n u l l o s s e s t o t h e f i s h e r y resources would be about $280,000, 18, 'The i r r e d u c i b l e ninimun flow recommended f o r t h e maintenance of f i s h l i f e and f b h h g i n t h e 12.3 miles of stream t h a t will be a f f e c t e d by t h e p r o j e c t i s 200 sscond-feet a s measured a t t h e point of r e l e a s e from Hock Creek and Cresta d m s , Flows ' g r e a t e r t h a n t h i s would enhance f i s h e r y values, and' c a r e f u l study i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e f i s h e r y resources might be maintained a t o r near t h e i r present l e v e l s of abundance with a minimu flow o f about 400 second-feet, 19, Because t h e present a p p l i c a t i o n concerns only twa u n i t s of a t o t a l of t e n u l t i m a t e l y p l a n e d , t h r e e of which exclusive of Lake AL manor have a l r e a d y been ccnstructed and a r e in operation, it seems ap- p r o p r i a t e t o c a l l a t t e n t i o n t o c e r t a i n phases of operation of eristing u n i t s t h a t should be corrected f o r t h e protection of f i s h l i f e , a. Releases from Ldce Almanor t o North Fork a r e q u i t e e r r a t i c and a f f e c t about 1 0 miles of stream between t h e dam and Caribou powerhouau, According t o 191+3 flow records, t h e mean discharge f rm Ldce Almanor was 223 ,second-feet, However, reloasos of l e s s t h a n 20 second-feet were made during t h e months of May, June, J ~ d y ,August, and September, with a minimum r e l e a s e of 4.4 second-feet being made in Septmber, These a r e t h e months of t h e yeal* during which t h e water demands of t r o u t a r e g r s a t e s t , Under present operation schadules, flows a r e obviously lowest during t h e s e months, I n o r d s r t o c o r r e c t t h i s s i t u a t i o n i n t h e i n t e r e s t of f i s h e r y maintenance, it i s recommended t h a t a minknun flow of not l e s s t h a n 100 second-feet, a s measured a t a point 0.5 milo above Caribou powerhouse bo maintained i n North Forko b. The operation of Caribou power plant s e r i o u s l y a f f e c t s about 7 miles of North Fork from t h e powerhouse t o t h e confluence of East Branch and t o a l e s s e r deeree a d d i t i o n a l miles of stream below t h a t point. The p l a n t apparently operates on a demand b a s i s which r e s u l t s in extreme f l u c t u a t i o n s in discharge, During t h e course of a one-hour observation on A p r i l 10, 1947, discharges from t h e plant varied between 20 and 650 second-feeto V e r t i c a l changes Fn stream love1 below t h e plant varied between 6 inches and 3 f e e t depending on t h e character of t h e s t r e a n channol, I n t h o irkcrest of conservstion and maintenance of f i s h l i f e i n North Fork, t h i s condition should be and can be corrected by construction of an a f t e r b a y dam to smooth flow i r r e g u l a r i t i e s , 20, If recornendations f o r minimum flows as made h e r e i n a r e followed below Rock Creek D ~ i n , it i s e s t b t e d , t h a t f i s h e r y values in t h e p r o j e c t a r e a could be nai?tained a t about 50 per, cent of t h e preproject l e v e l and would mount t o about $160,000 annually. / The f i s h e r y resources would s u s t a i n annual l o s s e s amounting $0 a t l e a s t , $155,0000 I f r e l e a s e s a r e mado from ,Lake fJlnanor t o provide f l o x s of 100 sacond-feet a t Caribou, and t h i s inicrcased f l o w i s c a r r i e d unimpeded dowistrean), an a d d i t i o n a l awual f i s h e r y !value o f $85,000 would be .provided f o r t h e s t r e t c h from L&a A h a n o r t o :Rock Creek Dan, The n e t annual l o s s t o t h o North Fork would be roduced , t o $70,C00e This total v a l u e ' p r e c l u d e s t h e improvment o f stroam . f l u c t u a t i o n s below Caribou powerhouse, 21. Rock Creck and Crosta dams would be c o n s t ~ ~ c t es do l e l y t o c r e a t e head f o r t h e d i v a r s i o n of water, Forobay w a t e r s wu~?d b:, ra?idly oxchanged s i n c e s t o r a g e c a p a c i t i e s a r e low in r e l a t i o n t o Fqflois 2nd discharge. Thus, t h e s e w6ters would retain some s t r o a n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s while assmi n g c e r t a i n r e s e r v o i r c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s as depth and i n c r e a s u d p l a c i d surface area, T h e i r v a l u e t o t h e f i s h e r y r e s o u r c e s of North Fork l i a s somewhc~e between t y p i c a l ytream and t y p i c a l r e s e r v o i r conditicins, Kocever, a f t e r c a r e f u l study, it seems proper t o e v a l u a t e t h m on an area basis r a t h e r than in t e r m s of volume of flow and 1i;riit t h a pw-acre value t o one-half o f t h e regular r e s e r v o i r value f o r s t o r a g s inpow-cfinents of t h a same area, 22, ' The Rock Creek forebay would have an @Ife c t i v o area of 122 a c r e s and t h e Cresta forebay, 97 a c r e s f o r a total of 219 ackes, These forcbays would have an annual f i s h e r y value o f about $2,450, 23. Fishways wohld not be r e q u i r e d f o r t h e d m s since m i g r a t o r y f i s h e s a r e n o t involved. Consideration should be givan t.be problem o f screening d i v e r s i o n i n t a k e s t o prevent p s s i b l e l o s s of f i s h * However, it i s recognized t h a t t h e screening of t h e d i v e r s i o n s from Rock Creak and C r e s t a dams might n o t be e c ~ n o ~ n i c a l ljustified y nor physically possible t o accomplish, ' 24. Schedule of Nininm Flows : Kinini~unFlows in Second-feet ,: , Postpro,ject :Mil.es:Prepro.ject :Sl?onsor's P1an:Reco~nmcnded St'r.eam S e c t i o n Lpke A h a n o r t o Caribou 10,OO 10 10 100 7.00 60 60 150 2.00 182 162 272 2.80 202 Rock Creek Dam t o Bucks Creek Powerhouse 6.00 220 17 217 520 317 517 Powerhouse Caribou Powerhouse t o E a s t Branch East Branch t o head bf Rock Creek Reservoir Head of Reservoir t o Rock . Creek Dam + Inundated by r e s e r v o i r I Bucks Creek Powerhouse t o head of C r e s t a Re3ervoirL50 I Head of R e s e r v o i r t o C r e s t a Dam ~ r e s t aDan t o Cresta Powerhouse 1.75 532 4.80 547 Inundated by r a s o m i r Ute5 2l-4-e5 ,I 1 v * $ *: . b. , w 25. ' L 1 Starmiry of F i s h e r y Values in t h e Pro,ject P.res PostproLject P r ~ p r o ~ j e c t Sponsor Service , % f,. $, LOSS Sponsor Service * Excluding recomnended~flohsbslow Lake--klmanore 5 . - WILDLJYE SECTION 26. The ~ r o j e c tw i l l not appreciably a f f e c t e r d s t i n g w f i d l i f e resources of t h e a r e a o I n general, t h e p r e c i p i t o u s , roc@ canyon of North Fork provides very l i t t l e s u i t a b l e h a b i t a t f o r upland game b i r d s and ~ h 3 l 3 , Deer are found in t h e highlands and t o some e x t e n t in t h e canyono Q u a i l a r e t h e only upland game b i r d s found in t h e a r e a , b u t they a r e few i n number and t h e i r h a b i t a t is l i m i t e d t o stream margins. 27, Occasional waterfowl frequent t h e a r e a in f l i g h t batween Lake Almanor and Central Valley and m i g h t t,wssibly use t h e forebaye of Rock Creek and C r e s t a Dams as resting areas. But because of t h e Rocky n a t u r e of the t e r r a i n t h a t t h e y would inundate, t h e s e forebays would not develop feeding o r e a e o 28, A canyon, but be a f f e c t e d habitat f o r * IJ f2 ", ! f . I few mink, skunk, and coyotes are known t o occur in North Fork it 13 doubtful t h a t any a r e r e s i d e n t in t h e a r e a s that would by t h e proposed impounclrnents because of t h e l a c k of s u i t a b l e then, /s/ Rudolph Dieff enbach, Coordinator, River Basin Studies, March 1948. Figure lo Rock Ore& Dm sitaEcut bank. 2pproximate crest level of d a ~ . I t i n e indicahes F i y r e 2, Rock Creak D m sitscciJoot bank look&ig downstream. 1. Hark at crest lsveL of dm. 2. Center l i n e marh-er:iof tunnel, , F i p e 3, Rock Cresk Dm . s i t looking ~ dotg~stwm f ran northwest.c o r n e r , of axis o f spillway, ". ., Figure 40 Crest;&D m s i t e ' '(approximate)., l o o k i n g $strean. ' .. View I '
© Copyright 2024