Proposed Center for Ecology, Evolution and Management of Pesticide Resistance 2015 CEEMPR PROPOSAL EVALUATION FORM Please evaluate each CEEMPR project found at http://ceempr.unl.edu/revised-projects . There is a page for each project in this form. We request only one evaluation per CEEMPR member. Please fill out this form, save the file, and attach it to an email to Dr. Tom Hunt at [email protected] Member Company/Organization: __________________________________________________ Name of individual reporting evaluations: ___________________________________________ Email Address: ____________________________ Phone Number: ___________________________ Thank you, Thomas E. Hunt CEEMPR Director University of Nebraska - Lincoln Haskell Agricultural Laboratory 57905 866 Road Concord, NE 68728 (402) 584-3863 / [email protected] Project 1.1 - Potential Interactions of Insect and Weed Resistance in the Western Corn Belt Agroecosystem. Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 1.2 - Development of Diagnostic Bioassays for Characterizing and Documenting Insect Pest Susceptibility Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 1.3 - Predicting Risk of Rootworm Injury to Corn in the Midwestern U.S. Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 2.1 - Geographic Distribution and Patterns of Herbicide Resistance Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 2.2 - Emerging Issues in Herbicide Resistance Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 2.3 - Disrupting Herbicide Resistant Weed Life Cycles Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 2.4 - Evaluating Genetic Control Technologies for Potential Resistance Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 3.1 - Emergence and Evolution of Fungicide Resistance in Fungal Plant Pathogens Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4 Project 4.1 - Modern Educational and Extension Programming for Resistance Management and Wise Stewardship of Crop Technologies Please rank (1-4, with 1 being best) and comment on the following categories: Scientific Merit (e.g. is experimental design sound?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Relevance (e.g. does the project fulfil the goals of the Center?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ Feasibility (e.g. are personnel, budget, facilities adequate?) 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ OVERALL: Please rank the project on a scale of 1 (Very Interested), 2 (Interested), 3 (Not Interested), or 4 (Do Not Fund). ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 Additional comments or suggestions to improve the project: ☐ 4
© Copyright 2024