HAMPSTEAD HEATH MANAGEMENT PLAN PART I TOWARDS A PLAN FOR THE HEATH 2007 – 2017 Prepared in association with Land Use Consultants November 2007 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 4 MAJOR ISSUES ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................. 9 HAMPSTEAD HEATH ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 THE NEED FOR MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................................ 9 WHY PRODUCE A NEW MANAGEMENT PLAN? ................................................................................................................. 9 THE STRUCTURE OF THE NEW MANAGEMENT PLAN ....................................................................................................... 11 HOW HAS THIS PLAN BEEN PRODUCED?........................................................................................................................ 13 FUTURE PUBLIC USE ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 PUBLIC OPINION .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 PUBLIC PRESSURE ......................................................................................................................................................... 15 SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 ACCESS FOR DISABLED PEOPLE ...................................................................................................................................... 16 3. THE VISION.......................................................................................................................................................... 17 4. THE CHARACTER OF HAMPSTEAD HEATH ........................................................................................... 19 5. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY OVERVIEW.................................................................................... 22 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................................................................. 22 THE LONDON STRATEGIC POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................ 24 THE CITY OF LONDON’S STRATEGIC POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 24 THE CITY OF LONDON’S ROLE AS THE CUSTODIAN OF ITS OPEN SPACES ........................................................................ 26 THE OPEN SPACES DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LONDON ......................................................................................... 26 MANAGEMENT, STAFFING AND FUNDING ...................................................................................................................... 26 CAMDEN AND BARNET STRATEGIC POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................... 28 THE ROLE OF ENGLISH HERITAGE................................................................................................................................. 30 6. INTRODUCTION TO ISSUES AND PROPOSALS FOR HEATH MANAGEMENT .......................... 31 7. ISSUES AND PROPOSALS FOR HEATH MANAGEMENT..................................................................... 33 7.1 HISTORY............................................................................................................................................................. 33 7.2 NATURAL LANDSCAPE .................................................................................................................................... 38 7.3 HYDROLOGY..................................................................................................................................................... 44 7.4 DESIGNED LANDSCAPE ................................................................................................................................... 48 7.5 BUILT ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................................................... 50 7.6 INFORMAL PUBLIC USE..................................................................................................................................... 56 7.7 SPORTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 63 7.8 ACCESS AND EDUCATION.............................................................................................................................. 68 8. IMPLEMENTATION AND PRIORITISATION............................................................................................. 78 © City of London PO Box 270, Guildhall London EC2P 2EJ July 2008 reprint 2 APPENDIX ONE – FIGURES Figure 1: Accessible open space over 50 hectares Figure 2: Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Figure 3: Hampstead Heath 1871 Figure 4: Hampstead Heath 2006 Figure 5: Population density within one mile of Hampstead Heath Figure 6: Indices of Multiple Deprivation within one mile of Hampstead Heath Figure 7: Schools within one mile of Hampstead Heath Figure 8: Hampstead Heath aerial watercolour Figure 9: Hampstead Heath aerial photograph dated 2003 with veteran tree survey Figure 10: Hampstead Heath hedgerows in c.1866 Figure 11: Hampstead Heath hedgerows in 2006 Figure 12: Management framework Figure 13: Hampstead Heath planning policy context Figure 14: Hampstead Heath historic features Figure 15: Hampstead Heath by the end of the seventeenth century Figure 16: Hampstead Heath in the early nineteenth century Figure 17: Hampstead Heath 2006 Figure 18: Hampstead Heath broad habitat types Figure 19: Hampstead Heath built environment Figure 20: Facilities relating to the general public use Figure 21: Sports facilities and areas APPENDIX TWO – BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDIX THREE – GLOSSARY 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The Hampstead Heath Management Plan covers general policy objectives and proposals relating to the management of Hampstead Heath for the period 2007 to 2017. This plan is the first of three parts which together will detail the management of the Heath in this period. This plan develops policies and proposals established in earlier management documents produced by the City of London since it took over responsibility for the management of the Heath in 1989. 1.2 The first four chapters set out why a new management plan is needed and how it is being produced, the vision for the future of the Heath, the essential character of the Heath, and the legal and structural framework within which the City of London operates. 1.3 In the later chapters the future strategy is set out in a series of ‘Overriding Objectives’, ‘Essential Actions’ and longer term ‘Aspirational Goals’, covering the different aspects of the management of Hampstead Heath. These are dealt with under eight different headings – history, natural landscape, hydrology, designed landscape, built environment, informal public use, sports, and access and education. 1.4 Many different groups have contributed to the preparation of this report, in particular the Heath staff. Important contributions have also come from working groups covering the different areas, and from the outside consultants Land Use Consultants. The City of London continues to be firmly committed to public consultation in developing its management plans. 1.5 The management plan is an important tool in guiding the future of Hampstead Heath. It allows staff and members of the Heath committees to stand back from day-to-day issues, to look at their work in wider context. It helps staff to plan and prioritise their work, and gives something against which to measure progress. It provides a basis for public consultation, for dissemination of information, and helps to stimulate wider public involvement. 1.6 This plan builds on previous work, providing detail and fleshing out policy and mechanisms for setting priorities. The plan recognises the need to establish measuring and monitoring systems. Details of strategy will be further elaborated in Part II, and management regimes for the different areas of the Heath will be covered in the volumes that comprise Part III. The existing 4 policies within the Interim Hampstead Heath Management Plan 2006–08 will remain in force until superseded by the new management plan. 1.7 The actions needed to realise the vision of Hampstead Heath are set out under eight section headings. In all cases accessibility, inclusivity, biodiversity and sustainability need to be taken into account. There are potential conflicts and overlap between the actions and aspirations, both across and within the sections. Priorities will need to be set and conflicts resolved within the overriding primary objective of managing and preserving the Heath as an open space and of maintaining its unique wild and natural aspects and its ecology. The plan concludes with an impression of what the Heath might look like in years to come. 1.8 Aspirations and expectations will always have to be tempered by the constraints of a budget. Planning must be undertaken on the basis of the level of resources available – which may fluctuate. There may, however, be the opportunity to seek external funding to support major projects identified in this plan. 1.9 At the heart of any new management plan for Hampstead Heath must be a conviction that it is the natural qualities of the Heath which are its richest asset. Any changes to the fabric or management regime of the Heath should be undertaken with this in mind. Major issues 1.10 History x Protect, conserve and interpret the historic aspects of the Heath x Compile an inventory of historic features and archive of historic materials x Use historic mapping to protect important features x Consider restoration of lost views where appropriate x Encourage historical research, and make results more readily available. Other projects include better promotion of the Heath’s history, the restoration of lost landscapes and undertaking an archaeological survey. 1.11 Natural Landscape x Retain and enhance the Heath’s habitats and natural resources to enable continued enjoyment by visitors x Carry out vegetation surveys and monitor changes in the Heath’s ecology x Provide regimes for management of woodlands, hedgerows, grasslands and ponds 5 x x x Protect priority species and encourage biodiversity Plan for climate change Interpret the Heath’s landscape and wildlife resources. Other projects include providing undisturbed scrubland for birds, nurturing veteran trees and planting replacements for the future, restoring and expanding significant habitats, further control of invasive species and encouragement of conservation in the neighbouring areas outside the Heath. 1.12 Hydrology x Manage the Heath’s ponds and watercourses to enhance their nature conservation value, reduce flood risk and address water quality problems x Carry out detailed surveys to aid development of hydrology strategy x Manage reservoirs and ponds to meet statutory obligations x Map and manage man-made surface water drainage x Improve water quality x Slow water flow in watercourses and increase surface water absorption x Review fishing policy. 1.13 Designed Landscape x Produce conservation management plans for Golders Hill Park and the Hill Garden and explore the potential of the designed landscapes for educational use x Achieve listing for Golders Hill Park on the English Heritage Register. Other projects include improving the supply of information at Golders Hill Park, and exploring the feasibility of using the Hill Garden and Pergola for marriages and civil ceremonies. 1.14 Built Environment x Carry out a detailed Buildings Review x Maintain listed buildings and structures x Develop a conservation and maintenance programme for the built environment x Consider the location of refreshment facilities and provision of toilets and drinking fountains x Ensure that new buildings and the adaptation of existing buildings are to appropriate designs x Protect the Heath from developments that threaten its views and ambience. 6 Other projects include restoring and improving the Lido and Athletics Track facilities, improving major entrances to the Heath, including Parliament Hill, and restoring the Hill Garden and Pergola, the Pitt Arch and the Hill Garden Shelter. 1.15 Informal Public Use x Recognise that the Heath’s main users are those who come for informal activity. By far the highest percentage of these come to walk (with or without dogs) x Recognise that the Heath is for everyone and that, as far as is reasonably practical, recreational activities should not adversely affect others’ enjoyment or the natural aspect of the Heath x Undertake surveys of Heath use and users x Establish policy guidelines with respect to litter collection, dog-walking, fishing, events and fairs x Commission a further review of cycling x Continue cooperation in management of sexual activity on the Heath. Other projects include producing and implementing a management plan for the Zoo and the Deer Enclosure at Golders Hill Park. 1.16 Sports x Establish a Sports Advisory Forum x Promote and provide for managed swimming facilities at the Swimming Ponds and Lido x Consider development of new sports facilities if there is a demand and subject to satisfying a series of criteria (see Essential Actions S5 and S6) x Encourage wider use of sports facilities x Monitor patterns of use of sports facilities, in order to identify opportunities for increased use where there is spare capacity x Explore establishing a club to encompass a range of Heath sports x Explore opportunities offered by the 2012 Olympics. Other projects include bringing underused parts of the Lido into use and enhancing the Athletics Track Pavilion. 1.17 Access and Education x Prepare an Access Plan and consider barriers to access x Carry out a disability and an access audit for the whole Heath. Provide and maintain an access map and consider specific publications for those with mobility and other problems 7 x x x x x x x Work with transport and service providers to improve local signage to encourage use of public transport by visitors Prepare an Audience Development Plan Develop more opportunities for volunteering Provide a safe environment for users of the Heath Improve maps at Heath entrance points Increase outreach work in schools and community groups Develop an overall Interpretation Plan. Other projects include undertaking a Traffic Management Review, looking at the possibility of using technology to deliver information, considering the provision of a visitor centre and where it might be located and developing Hampstead Heath publications. 8 2. INTRODUCTION Hampstead Heath 2.1 Hampstead Heath is a 275 hectare open space owned and managed by the City of London as a registered charity. It comprises a mosaic of habitats including woodland, grassland, scrub and open water. Close to the centre of London, it is one of the most important areas for recreation in the capital (see Figures 1 and 2). The City of London became the custodian of Hampstead Heath in 1989, taking over from the London Residuary Body which had managed the Heath following the abolition of the Greater London Council in 1986. 2.2 The adjacent 45 hectare Kenwood Estate, including Kenwood House, is owned and managed by English Heritage. Although the Kenwood Estate forms an integral part of the open space as a whole, it is not covered by this plan. 2.3 Hampstead Heath is located in the London Boroughs of Camden (230 hectares) and Barnet (45 hectares). The City of London works closely with these two local authorities and with English Heritage (in regard to Kenwood) and with other bodies on matters relating to management, public use, access to the Heath and protection of its views. The need for management 2.4 Far from being a wholly natural environment, Hampstead Heath today is the result of human interventions over the course of many years. For example, the area of woodland on the Heath has expanded hugely in the last one hundred years following cessation of grazing (see Figures 3 and 4), with the resultant loss of original heathland, hedgerow and meadow habitats. This relationship between woodland and other habitats on the Heath needs to be balanced through active management. The vision and recommendations that result from this management planning process will shape the Heath of the future and maintain its diversity. Why produce a new management plan? 2.5 There are many reasons for having a management plan for a site as important and as complex as the Heath. These include: 9 x x x x x x x x x Providing a framework for consistent, long-term management based on an agreed set of policy priorities which identify the objectives of site management and seek a balance between any conflicts of interest Identifying the assets of the site and providing a definitive description Allowing for the views of site managers, Heath users and the local community to be heard Establishing a dialogue with the local community so that on-going communication can be improved Monitoring implementation and management against an agreed set of targets Guiding day-to-day work and helping increase job satisfaction Defining team and individual responsibilities more clearly Helping management of resources and exploring funding opportunities Stimulating ideas and encouraging a better understanding of Heath management. 2.6 The City of London is committed to reviewing regularly the management plan for Hampstead Heath. Plans were produced in 1995 and in 2000 and an interim version relating to the years 2006–08 was produced in July 2006. The Hampstead Heath Management Committee (see Section 5.5) set out the structure of this current review in 2004. 2.7 The Interim Hampstead Heath Management Plan 2006–08 sets out a series of policy statements. Those statements lack detail and it has been difficult to get a sense of the major challenges and resourcing strategies that need to be adopted. 2.8 Previous plans have served the Heath well, but in recent years the approach to management planning for open spaces has changed. CABE Space (the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment’s landscape and open space section) and Civic Trust who manage the Green Flag Award (The Green Flag Award, the national standard for parks and green spaces in England and Wales, which has been awarded to Hampstead Heath annually since 1998) have been promoting the need for more comprehensive management plans. Adjudicators from Green Flag have also identified areas where the presentation and content of the current policy plan could be improved. 2.9 The current plan also needs updating to reflect changes in practice and knowledge. A carefully considered and reasoned set of priorities for management will enable managers to seek funding and resources more effectively. 10 The structure of the new management plan 2.10 Given the size and complexity of Hampstead Heath, any new plan must be comprehensive. The new plan will be divided into three separate parts, so that it is not too unwieldy and will be easily accessible for different audiences with different areas of interest. These will range from the general reader who wishes to understand the City of London’s overall philosophy and the main issues and challenges in managing the Heath, to staff on the ground who are preparing annual work programmes. ‘Towards a Plan for the Heath’ sets out the main challenges and issues. It is the first of the three documents which will comprise the comprehensive Hampstead Heath Management Plan. x Part I –Towards a plan for the Heath 2.11 This first part of the plan provides an opportunity to step back from the day-today running of the Heath and create a vision for the Heath in years to come. It is a chance to identify tasks and opportunities that might otherwise get lost amid the necessity of managing one of the country’s busiest open spaces every day of the year. 2.12 This is a key scene-setting document. The early chapters establish the context and background, while Chapter Seven explores in more depth the main issues that emerge to influence the conservation and enhancement of the Heath. 2.13 This part of the plan does not aim to provide all of the answers nor attempt to cover every aspect of Heath management. Many routine tasks that are fundamental to the smooth running of the Heath are not described here. This does not mean they are not important. For example, if litter was not cleared for a day there would be an immediate and obvious impact on the appearance of the Heath. Over a recent single summer weekend, for example, eight tonnes of litter were removed. 2.14 The purpose of this document is to identify what needs to be done to conserve the special qualities of Hampstead Heath, while assessing the potential benefits and impact of any new initiatives. It also looks at ways of managing resources more efficiently. Not all of the issues and projects identified in this plan can be addressed at once; some will require additional resources. 2.15 Following approval in November 2007 by the Hampstead Heath Management Committee of Part I of this plan, work will begin on Part II – Topic Papers, as follows: 11 x Part II – Topic Papers 2.16 This section of the management plan will set out in much greater detail the management techniques required to implement the management plan. 2.17 There will be a series of topic papers, most likely based on the headings under Chapter Seven of Part I of the management plan (history, natural landscape etc.) 2.18 The natural landscape topic paper is likely, for example, to begin by summarising Hampstead Heath’s nature conservation resource (such as habitats, plants, birds, invertebrates, mammals) and explain what is special about the place. Management history will be explored. The management techniques required to conserve and enhance the natural resource will then be explained (for example coppicing, hedgerow management, mowing, dead wood management) and how these techniques will be implemented on the Heath will be introduced. These topic papers will detail the timescales over which new initiatives should be introduced, as well as those relating to routine tasks. 2.19 It will also identify the outputs or other measures of management which are considered appropriate for each topic. This will provide the framework for setting targets and measuring success for the medium term action plans and one-year work plans described in Part III. x Part III – Management specifications 2.20 This part of the plan will set out in detail how to apply management techniques to each area of the Heath. There will be separate volumes for each main area of the Heath, such as the Heath Extension, Sandy Heath etc. People who want to know in detail how a particular part of the Heath will be managed will probably find this volume to be of greatest interest. This part of the plan will feed directly into the annual work programme. 2.21 The three-part comprehensive Hampstead Heath Management Plan will be reviewed every ten years. In addition, medium term action plans will be prepared to monitor implementation of the strategic issues. These will feed into the business planning framework, together with annual work programmes (see Section 8.1). 2.22 The existing policies within the Interim Hampstead Heath Management Plan 2006–08 will remain in force until Parts I and II of the new management plan have been agreed. 12 How has this plan been produced? 2.23 This document brings together the ideas that have come out of the first part of the management planning process. The process was led by Heath staff, who have been advised by professional consultants. Integral to the process was input from all interested organisations and members of the public. 2.24 Six working groups were established with the help of the Consultative Committee (see Section 5.5) to review specific topics. Membership of the groups included acknowledged experts in that field, local interest and user groups, partner organisations and members of staff. The working groups established were: x x x x x x History Natural Landscape Built Environment Sport Access and Education Policy. 2.25 Some of these represent distinct categories, but inevitably others overlap and affect each other. For example, the ancient hedgerow trees on the Heath are both part of its history and part of its natural landscape. These trees must be managed with reference to their historic interest and their wildlife importance, as well as with reference to public safety. 2.26 The working groups carried out a great deal of valuable work that has been fully considered during the production of this part of the plan and will provide invaluable background information that will help define the detailed management tasks in Part II and Part III. 2.27 It is appropriate that this management plan has been put together with the help of members of the public, since a substantial part of the Heath was saved by members of the public in the face of the threat of development. Future public use 2.28 The Heath is a precious resource for people who come to enjoy the natural world, whether through walking, quiet reflection, informal study, environmental education, organised activities, physical exercise or informal play and exploration for children. It must be maintained for the future by suitable management. 13 2.29 Increasingly, the benefits of open spaces to people’s health and well-being are being recognised. The Value of Public Space – how high quality parks and public spaces create economic, social and environmental value (CABE Space 2004) highlights a number of these. They include: improving physical and mental health, providing stimulation and interest for children and young people, reducing crime and the fear of crime and adding to the economic value of communities. 2.30 Demographic surveys of the surrounding residential population reveal sharp discrepancies from relatively wealthy in the north to very poor and densely populated to the south (see Figures 5 and 6). Local demographics change constantly and they are likely to continue to do so. For example, Camden Council estimates that its population will grow by around 35,000 (15%) by 2026. There is, therefore, a wide range of people with whom to engage. In the south there are a greater number of schools which are potential Heath users (see Figure 7). 2.31 There are conflicting demands and conflicting opinions as to how the Heath should be managed. People see and use the Heath in different ways. Extensive consultation on a continuing basis will yield a broad range of views to help inform decision making. 2.32 The consultation preceding publication of this document encouraged new contacts and relationships with a wide range of organisations and individuals. These must be maintained and developed. Public opinion 2.33 From August to September 2006 a relatively small visitor survey captured 376 responses. Overall, this illustrated that people are generally very happy with Hampstead Heath and the way that it is managed. There are some potential areas of improvement that need to be addressed. These issues are considered in this document. 2.34 As part of the 2006 visitor survey, where expressing an opinion: x x x 85% of respondents stated that the care and protection of nature and wildlife was very good or good 82% of respondents stated that the facilities/services that are provided for children and their parents were very good or good 77% of respondents stated that the sports facilities were very good or good 14 x x x x x 98% of respondents stated that staff were either very helpful or helpful 96% of respondents said their impression of Hampstead Heath was very good or good, with ‘the feeling of open space’ (22%) and ‘wild space/beautiful area in London/feeling of being out of London’ (21%) being the most common reasons 82% of respondents rated the standard of cleanliness and maintenance as very good or good 82% of respondents indicated that they found it very easy or easy to get around the Heath 68% of respondents rated the range of visitor facilities as very good or good. Public pressure 2.35 For Londoners, contact with nature is of paramount importance. The Heath’s ability to absorb the millions of visitors that it attracts needs to be addressed. 2.36 Sensitive habitats must be protected and they do require careful management. Whether the Heath (or individual parts of it) has a maximum number of visitors beyond which its valued qualities are diminished should be considered. This will be addressed in Part II of the management plan to ensure that a balance is struck between public access and the importance of safeguarding the Heath as a natural resource. 2.37 Information should be made available to help understanding of these issues and the responsibilities of all interested organisations. Sustainability 2.38 Sustainability can be defined as the balance between providing the best outcome for humans and the natural environment now and into the future. It recognises that society and its members should be able to meet their own needs while preserving biodiversity and natural ecosystems. Sustainability affects every level of organisation, from the local neighbourhood, to the entire planet. 2.39 Sustainability must influence all aspects of management. Specific sustainability issues and further management actions and projects are addressed under the topics in Chapter Seven. 2.40 The special qualities of the Heath can only be conserved effectively if the underlying quality of the environment which supports them is maintained and 15 improved. Some issues including much of the air and noise pollution are affected by influences beyond the Heath. Nevertheless, air and noise pollution emanating from the Heath should be minimised. The Heath has an important role to play in contributing to general environmental sustainability, including reducing energy consumption and increasing recycling. 2.41 The influence of human activities on climate change is now recognised. The three warmest years on record have all occurred since 1998; 19 of the warmest 20 have been since 1980. For open spaces this presents a significant management challenge because more extreme weather events have a dramatic effect on hydrology, biodiversity and the built environment. 2.42 Research is ongoing nationally and locally into the possible effects of climate change. This will help predict the effects on the local environment of the Heath, which could be major. In turn, this will provide information on how to help protect the Heath’s environment – for example, to take into account effects on different tree species and to help identify priorities for improving conservation and sustainable working practices. Access for disabled people 2.43 The requirements of the Disability Discrimination Acts and the desire to address accessibility to the Heath, its buildings and facilities, needs to influence all aspects of management. Specific access issues are addressed in Chapter Seven under Access and Education. 16 3. THE VISION x The Vision 3.1 Our vision is of a beautiful and accessible piece of countryside in the city, a place with a rich mosaic of habitats, a diverse landscape and a wealth of historic and natural resources. 3.2 This is a vision in which a wide diversity of communities and organisations work together so that visitors can enjoy the Heath and its amenities, including its sporting and recreational facilities. x The Mission 3.3 A mission statement was included in the Interim Hampstead Heath Management Plan 2006–08. It sets out overall aims for the open space which can still be endorsed. The statement is: x x x x x x x x x As the primary objective, to manage and preserve the Heath as an open space and maintain its unique wild and natural aspects and its ecology To pursue positive management policies in line with the Interim Hampstead Heath Management Plan 2006–08 and the statutory requirements, while maintaining a balance between competing needs To maintain to a high standard the recreation and sporting facilities on the Heath for the enjoyment of all members of the community To protect the flora and fauna of the Heath and promote conservation To develop effective consultation procedures so that all interested parties have an input to the development and running of the Heath To prevent encroachment and resist any development which adversely affects any part of the Heath To ensure the safety of all users of the Heath and the security of City assets To provide information and develop public understanding of the Heath and its ecological systems through an effective communication and education system To promote the personal development of all staff in order to improve the service provided 17 x 3.4 The following additional objectives are identified: x x x x x x x x 3.5 To improve efficiency and demonstrate good financial discipline by constantly reviewing operational procedures and all aspects of management to ensure that the highest quality of service is provided. To ensure that the Heath is available, welcoming and accessible for all as far as is reasonably practicable To ensure that it is recognised that the Heath’s main users are those who come for informal activity and that by far the highest percentage of these come to walk To preserve, manage and interpret the historic artefacts, designed gardens and significant built environment To improve the appearance and functionality of facilities used for organised sport, events and informal recreation To work in an environmentally sustainable manner and to address the challenges that climate change may bring To work together in partnership to promote and achieve the Vision for the Heath through co-ordinated policies and actions To encourage volunteering on the Heath as a rewarding recreation in itself and as a means of involving people of all ages in Heath management To be fully engaged in the planning system as it affects views out from the Heath and land adjacent to the Heath. While recognising the different character areas of the Heath, the overall strategy required to achieve this vision is to recognise and manage the Heath as a whole (see Figure 8 and Sections 4.11 and 4.12). x How progress will be monitored 3.6 A set of indicators, including retention of the Green Flag Award, will be used to measure broad trends in management performance over time and to help show progress in achieving the overall vision. 18 4. THE CHARACTER OF HAMPSTEAD HEATH 4.1 The Heath is the largest area of open space in north-west London. The views south across London are spectacular, encompassing the whole meander of the Thames from Greenwich to west London against a backdrop of Blackheath and the Surrey Hills. To the west and north the panorama takes in the high spot of Harrow and sweeps towards the Mill Hill–Totteridge Ridge. The interplay between the Heath and the immediate surrounding townscape, including the historic village centres of Hampstead and Highgate and the Hampstead Garden Suburb, is noteworthy. 4.2 The scenery of the Heath is particularly varied because of its underlying geology and topography. The Heath straddles the Hampstead–Highgate ridge of Bagshot Sands, known as London’s Northern Heights, and also passes across the Claygate Beds and London Clay. This results in a range of ecological conditions, with a multitude of springs arising where the water meets the clay. Above this is the varied landscape of woods and grasslands with strings of ponds along the valleys. Because this landscape has its origins in the former countryside it contains long-established features, such as hedges and trees, which provide important continuity with past landscapes. The lines of ancient oaks along historic boundaries are a major feature and many individual trees are particularly significant in their own right as veteran specimens (see Figure 9). Special care is necessary to ensure the long-term survival of these vestiges of the former landscape. 4.3 The general atmosphere of the Heath is the feature valued most by its users – providing the opportunity to experience the ‘quiet enjoyment of nature’ in this ‘encapsulated countryside’. The Heath’s main users are those who come for informal activity, especially walking. From the heights that afford the vantage spots to take in views, the ground drops away into a series of folds that contain a wonderful variety of spaces; some are intimate enough to achieve a sense of isolation or of being in the countryside, in others it is possible to enjoy an informal game without intruding on adjacent quiet spaces. On the lower ground there are substantial remnants of a managed agricultural landscape, where hedge-lines create another set of enclosed spaces. These areas are now managed less intensively to encourage a diversity of habitats where wildlife flourishes (see Figures 10 and 11). 4.4 There are four chains of ponds. To the south are the Hampstead and Highgate valleys which have been dammed to create the Hampstead and Highgate ponds, 19 both eventually joining to feed the River Fleet. To the north there is the Golders Hill Park chain, which has been impounded at the lower end to create ponds in the designed landscape of the former Golders Hill Mansion, and the Heath Extension chain; both eventually join the River Brent. 4.5 Overlaid on the natural topography is a landscape that contains a record of centuries of human intervention. A Mesolithic settlement, industry (brickmaking, sand-quarrying etc.) and managed agriculture have all left their mark. It was only in the nineteenth century that local people recognised that this unique open space was being threatened by development. They rose up in opposition to save it and to ensure that it would forever remain a publicly accessible open space for the people of London. 4.6 Since then the landscape has continued to change, but without exploitation for economic return. Instead there was a demand for the Heath to be managed as little as possible, for it to remain ‘natural’. In fact, since the Heath has been so intensively exploited in earlier centuries, the result is that it is managed as a landscape that appears to be natural – almost a facsimile of wilderness. 4.7 For this to happen, the Heath must be actively managed. Without that, much of the Heath would be covered in trees and scrub. There would be erosion, loss of habitat and the water courses and ponds would become choked up and over-rich in nutrients. 4.8 There are three designed gardens related to the Heath – Kenwood (managed by English Heritage), the Hill Garden and Golders Hill Park. The first two are included in the English Heritage register of Parks and Gardens of Historic Interest in England and Wales. Kenwood has its own management plan that was prepared by English Heritage. It is proposed that management plans for the Hill Garden and Golders Hill Park be prepared. 4.9 The Heath is a mosaic of habitat and landscape types. It also provides a very broad range of facilities for organised and informal sport. It may be possible to increase sports use without designating new areas and without impinging on other requirements. 4.10 Hampstead Heath is not a public park such as Regent’s Park or Finsbury Park, both of which were designed and intended to have a more formal or gardenesque appearance. Neither, as a whole, can it be compared with the designed landscapes that are so familiar through the influence of Capability Brown. It is better compared with a National Park, in that it has a defined area but boasts multiple habitats. 20 4.11 Attempts to characterise the Heath by breaking it down into a number of separate areas, such as Sandy Heath and the Extension, are not helpful in establishing a vision, as this leads to debate on minutiae and a consequent lack of focus. 4.12 This review recognises the whole extent of Hampstead Heath as one entity, within which are particular areas that display a diversity of characteristics. Presentation and management of the Heath should consider the place as a whole. 4.13 Not everything has to stay the same, but it is essential to identify and to address threats to the Heath, for example, planning applications for developments that are adjacent to or visible from the Heath that would adversely affect its atmosphere or landscape setting. Some well-designed buildings, however, have had a positive impact on the Heath landscape. 21 5. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND POLICY OVERVIEW The legal framework 5.1 The City of London is obliged by virtue of various Acts of Parliament and, specifically, the provisions of the London Government Reorganisation (Hampstead Heath) Order 1989 to manage the Heath, protect it and make it available as open space. 5.2 The foundation legislation, the Hampstead Heath Act 1871, brought the original Heath into public ownership with the following obligations: x x x x Forever to keep the Heath open, unenclosed, unbuilt upon and by all lawful means to prevent, resist and abate all encroachment on the Heath and attempted encroachment and to protect the Heath and preserve it as an open space At all times to preserve as far as may be the natural aspect of the Heath and to that end to protect the turf, gorse, heather, timber and other trees, scrubs and brushwood thereon Not to sell, lease, grant or in any manner dispose of any part of the Heath To drain, level and improve the Heath, as far only as may be from time to time requisite, with a view to its use for purposes of health and unrestricted exercise and recreation1. 5.3 The Heath was extended subsequently to include Golders Hill Park, the Heath Extension and a number of other smaller additions, so that a range of legislative provisions and supplementary Orders affect the Heath. 5.4 The 1989 Transfer Order establishes a Trust Fund, the proceeds of which may be used to defray, in part, the cost of enhancing or replacing amenities on the Heath. The balance is met out of the City of London’s funds, at no cost to the public. 5.5 It also required the creation of two statutory committees. The Management Committee is the committee which is responsible for the implementation of policies and programmes of work in relation to the Heath 1 The Hampstead Heath Act, 1871, Sections 12 to 16 22 and directs the staff in regard to that management. It consists of 12 elected Members of the City of London together with representatives of the London Boroughs of Camden and Barnet, English Nature, English Heritage, the Heath and Hampstead Society and a representative who serves jointly on behalf of the Open Spaces Society and the Ramblers’ Association. The Committee is chaired by a City of London Member. It meets six times a year and undertakes a regular programme of visits to the Heath. The Consultative Committee makes representations to the Management Committee about any matter which affects or is likely to affect the Heath. It is chaired by the Chairman of the Management Committee, meets at least three times a year, and undertakes a regular programme of visits to the Heath. It currently comprises representatives of the following local organisations and amenity groups: Dartmouth Park Conservation Area Advisory Committee, Disability in Camden, Friends of Kenwood, Hampstead Conservation Area Advisory Committee, Hampstead Garden Suburb Residents’ Association, Heath and Hampstead Society, Heath Hands, Highgate Conservation Area Advisory Committee, Highgate Society, London Borough of Camden (Nature Conservation Officer), Mansfield Conservation Area Advisory Committee/ Mansfield Neighbourhood Association, Marylebone Bird Watching Society, Open Spaces Society, Ramblers’ Association, a representative of black and minority ethnic communities, a representative of disabled people, three representatives of clubs using sporting facilities on the Heath, South End Green Association and Vale of Health Society. 5.6 There are a number of groups, organisations and interest groups who make representations to the Superintendent and, as appropriate, through him to the Consultative Committee. The Superintendent raises other significant matters relating to Heath management with the Consultative Committee, which makes representations to the Management Committee. It is the Management Committee which directs the Superintendent and staff with regard to management of the Heath. 5.7 The Management Committee meetings and the Consultative Committee meetings are open to the public and to the press. 5.8 The City of London is committed to public consultation and it will continue to work closely with the statutory Hampstead Heath Consultative Committee and other local groups to develop and implement effective consultation procedures for the general management of the Heath. 23 x Other legal provisions and obligations 5.9 There are many laws which affect open space management. These have implications for public security, health and safety, nature conservation, sports, access and other issues. The legislation enables local authorities to hold land, provide services, enforce byelaws and, in some cases, impose fines. The London strategic policy context 5.10 The London Plan (2004) developed by the Greater London Authority is the strategic plan setting out an integrated social, economic and environmental framework for the future development of the capital, looking forward 15 to 20 years. Clearly, local authority planning and decision-making on Hampstead Heath must take full account of this. The London Plan is required to take account of three themes, all of relevance to Hampstead Heath: x The health of Londoners x Equality of opportunity x Contribution to sustainable development in the United Kingdom. 5.11 Hampstead Heath can also make a significant contribution to, or be influenced by, the Mayor of London’s biodiversity, transport and other strategies. 5.12 The Mayor of London’s Interim Strategic Planning Guidance on Tall Buildings, Strategic Views and the Skyline in London (2001) has a significant impact upon views from the Heath. The City of London’s strategic policy context 5.13 The City of London is a local authority. It is the oldest in the country and is unique in that it operates on a non-party political basis through its Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Members of the Court of Common Council. 5.14 Although Hampstead Heath falls outside its boundary, the City of London’s vision, policies and objectives set out within its corporate policy strategies – principally, in this context, its Community Strategy – provide the context of the site’s management: The City of London will build on its success as the world’s leading international financial and business centre, and will maintain high quality, accessible and responsive services benefiting its communities, its neighbours, London and the nation.2 2 The Community Strategy – ‘The City Together: A Vision for a World Class City’ 2004-2014 24 5.15 The Community Strategy objectives are set out under eight main themes. Equal opportunities and accessibility are addressed across all themes. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. A world class city A skilled and learning city Good transport for a thriving city A clean, pleasant and attractive city A healthy city A safer city A vibrant and culturally rich city An inclusive and outward looking city. 5.16 The themes of the Community Strategy serve to bind the objectives of the City of London as a whole with the objectives of the City of London at Hampstead Heath. 5.17 Two specific objectives in the Community Strategy are the responsibility of the Open Spaces Department, which is responsible for the overall management of open spaces managed by the City of London including Hampstead Heath: x x 5.18 It contains six core values: x x x x x x 5.19 To protect and maintain open spaces and biodiversity through effective management To encourage services and initiatives which benefit wider communities and contribute to local, regional and national prosperity. Achieving excellence Involving stakeholders Valuing staff Working in partnership Promoting sustainability Promoting equality of opportunity. The chain of processes, from the Community Strategy, through the City of London’s Policy Plan/Medium Term Strategy, other statutory and partnership plans, to departmental business plans, site management plans and individual performance appraisals, establishes a clear link between all the different levels of strategy, policy, target setting, planning and action. 25 The City of London’s role as the custodian of its open spaces 5.20 Since the 1870s the City of London has had a policy of protecting open spaces from development and conserving them for the enjoyment of the public. It owns and manages approximately 4,250 hectares of open space in and around London. In addition to Hampstead Heath, this includes Epping Forest covering several authorities, Burnham Beeches in Buckinghamshire, West Ham Park in the London Borough of Newham, Queen’s Park in the London Borough of Brent, Bunhill Fields in the London Borough of Islington, five commons in Surrey, two commons in the London Borough of Bromley and Highgate Wood in the London Borough of Haringey. The Open Spaces Department of the City of London 5.21 The Open Spaces Directorate, based at Guildhall in the City of London, coordinates the overall management of the department and offers advice and support to the superintendents in the management of their individual sites. The Directorate co-ordinates responses to corporate initiatives and produces all reports on strategic and departmental policy issues including the Business Plan. The individual superintendents are responsible for reporting on activities in their areas (see Figure 12). 5.22 The City of London maintains a full list of sites and visitor information on its website at www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/openspaces and publicises the Open Spaces Directorate number as 020 7332 3517. 5.23 The Open Spaces Department vision is that, A world class city needs a world class environment. A series of objectives supporting that vision offer a context for the management of Hampstead Heath (Open Spaces Department Business Plan, 2006–09). 5.24 Other policy documents relevant to the management of the Heath include: x x Sustainability Policy Recycling Plan 2003–08. Management, staffing and funding 5.25 Management of the Heath and all of its facilities to a high standard and ensuring the broadest reasonable access requires provision of a management structure, employment of staff, provision of materials and machinery and service buildings. 26 The cost of employing staff represents the highest percentage of expenditure in the annual budget, in common with other open spaces. 5.26 Compared with urban parks, many of which are locked at night, the standards of day-to-day presentation on the Heath are very high, despite the fact that most of it is open day and night. Staff 5.27 In 2006 more than 130 staff were directly employed in managing and maintaining the Heath. x Areas of responsibility 5.28 The Superintendent oversees the managers, who are responsible for the dayto-day management of the following areas: x x x x x x Conservation and Tree Management Golders Hill Park Leisure and Events Parliament Hill and Technical Issues Constabulary and Support Services Resources. 5.29 Day-to-day operations are co-ordinated from three maintenance yards and depots located at Parliament Hill, Kenwood Nursery and Golders Hill Park. In addition there are several ancillary depots, bases or bothys at East Heath, Vale of Health, Highgate No.2 Pond, the Hill Garden and the Heath Extension. 5.30 The Superintendent and administrative staff are currently located at the headquarters at Heathfield House in Archway Road, just over one kilometre from the Heath. 5.31 Hampstead Heath is a registered charity (Charity No. 803392). x Volunteers 5.32 Heath Hands is a volunteer organisation, a registered charity (Charity No. 1083104) and associate of the British Trust for Conservation Volunteers. 5.33 Heath Hands works with conservation, gardening and education staff to organise practical work sessions (with up to 15 volunteers at a time several 27 times a week) to carry out a range of maintenance tasks, as well as survey work and stewarding at events such as the annual Duathlon and the Race for Life. The organisation is funded by the City of London, English Heritage and its own fundraising programme. 5.34 Voluntary organisations provide invaluable assistance to the management of the Heath. The London Natural History Society, for example, has a permanent presence carrying out biological monitoring and recording. Other organisations providing volunteer support include the Harrington Scheme and those that help out at cross-country events. x Management and maintenance budget 5.35 During 2006/07 the grant from the City of London private fund called City’s Cash for the management of the Heath was just over £5.8m. An additional £0.579m was contributed by the Hampstead Heath Trust Fund3 for the same year. None of this is derived from current local government taxation or as a result of grants from central government. 5.36 Aspirations and expectations will always have to be tempered by the constraints of a budget. Planning must be undertaken on the basis of the level of resources available – which may fluctuate. There may, however, be the opportunity to seek external funding to support major projects identified in this plan. Camden and Barnet strategic policy context 5.37 One of the key purposes of this Strategy is to provide a framework for coordinating the implementation of proposals and projects. Over the past five years a much stronger culture of partnership has been developed between the City of London and the London Boroughs of Camden and Barnet in which the Heath sits (see Figure 13). There are many proposals in this plan that will require or benefit from working closely with these local authorities and with the London Borough of Haringey which also borders the Heath for a short distance. 5.38 All local authorities have a statutory duty to produce a Community Strategy for their area. Both Camden and Barnet have their own Community Strategy which sets out plans for the future. They are: 3 The Trust Fund was established when the City of London assumed management of the Heath and has contributed approximately £17m to the running of the Heath over the past 15 years 28 Camden Together (2007 – 2012) There are four main themes: x x x x Creating a borough of opportunity Balancing growth with our environment Building strong, healthy and connected communities A safe and vibrant place at the heart of a world city. Barnet Sustainable Community Strategy (2006 – 2016) There are four priorities which matter most to Barnet’s communities and can only be tackled by partnership working: x x x x Investing in children and young people Safer, stronger and cleaner Barnet Growing successfully Healthier Barnet (including older people). 5.39 The Heath contributes to many of the themes and priorities identified above. The strategy for the Heath needs to be closely integrated with the Community Strategy process, in order to avoid duplication of efforts and to deliver the broadest and most inclusive services for local communities. 5.40 Both Camden and Barnet have specific local planning policies which are outlined in their respective Unitary Development Plans. These borough plans consider policies and statutory obligations relating to: x x x x x x x x x x x Strategic and local view/viewpoints and landmarks Natural environment (Metropolitan Open Land, open space) Parks and gardens of special historic interest/Heritage land Sites of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation Metropolitan walks and green corridors/green chains Nature conservation sites (including Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Sites of Nature Conservation Importance) Ancient woodlands and trees Conservation areas/areas of special character The built environment Archaeological sites and monuments (including Scheduled Ancient Monuments) Archaeological priority areas. 29 Many of these relate to designations defined by other bodies. For example, Sites of Special Scientific Interest are designated by Natural England. 5.41 In September 2004 a major reform of the planning system was introduced through the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act. As part of the reform, Unitary Development Plans are being replaced by the Local Development Framework. This will be made up of a series of documents based upon the old Unitary Development Plans, which will also tie in with the London Plan. 5.42 The Community Strategies and Unitary Development Plans are supported by other local authority documents including cultural strategies, open space strategies, sports strategies and biodiversity action plans. The Role of English Heritage 5.43 While the Kenwood Estate is managed by English Heritage, there is obviously a need to liaise closely with their staff, to ensure that the management of both areas and the boundary between them can be co-ordinated and that the visitor experience is seamless. 30 6. INTRODUCTION TO ISSUES AND PROPOSALS FOR HEATH MANAGEMENT 6.1 Chapter Seven is organised around the eight topics developed through extensive consultation: 7.1 History 7.2 Natural Landscape 7.3 Hydrology 7.4 Designed Landscape 7.5 Built Environment 7.6 Informal Public Use 7.7 Sports 7.8 Access and Education 6.2 Each section is divided into the headings: Context, Overriding Objective, Essential Actions and, where appropriate, Aspirational Goals. 6.3 Context provides the background to each topic. 6.4 Overriding Objectives summarise the main purpose of each of the eight sections. 6.5 Essential Actions are tasks that must take place if the Vision is to be achieved and the special character of the Heath is to be retained for future generations to enjoy. They may be achievable through the use of existing resources, by means of the skill of staff or volunteers, or they may require additional funding or resources. It will not be possible to pursue all of these actions at the same time. They will therefore need to be prioritised. 6.6 Aspirational Goals are major pieces of work which require consultation, further investigation into their feasibility and possibly substantial additional resources. They will therefore need to be prioritised. Many are second-stage projects that will be shaped by Essential Actions. 6.7 It should be recorded that Natural Landscape and Informal Public Use were considered the most important topics in the consultation preceding publication of this document. 6.8 This section of the plan addresses major issues that could or should be undertaken to achieve the Vision for the Heath’s future. Not all of these issues 31 can be addressed at once, so priorities will have to be established; some will require additional resources; some will require the support of other partners. 6.9 Before implementation, Essential Actions and Aspirational Goals must be judged in relation to the following criteria: x x x x x x x x x General public enjoyment of the Heath Health and safety Impact on the natural fabric of the Heath Criminal or civil liability and risk to reputation Financial implications Impact on historic features Social inclusion Sustainability Impact on neighbours. 6.10 The issues and proposals presented in Chapter Seven have been identified through detailed research and discussion with the working groups. 6.11 Chapter Seven does not aim to present a detailed description of every aspect of management. More comprehensive information about Heath management is contained in the draft Baseline Conditions and Management Issues documents (Land Use Consultants, October 2006) and will be included in Parts II and III of the Plan. 6.12 It has become clear, as part of the process of preparing this first part of the comprehensive management plan, that a number of further studies and reviews are necessary. These will further influence the process of determining priorities and projects. 32 7. ISSUES AND PROPOSALS FOR HEATH MANAGEMENT 7.1 HISTORY Context 7.1.1 Hampstead Heath represents a rare survival of Middlesex farmland and heathland, most of which was swept away by development in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It has a long, rich and very interesting history. 7.1.2 There are at least 55 principal artefacts, monuments and archaeological sites, all of which form a vital part of the history and character of the Heath (see Figure 14). 7.1.3 This history of Hampstead Heath takes a variety of forms including: Ancient natural features A walk across the Heath can reveal much about its underlying geology. On the higher slopes dry, springy footsteps indicate Bagshot Sands below, laid down by a river 25 million years ago. On the lower slopes damp, muddy strides point to underlying London Clay, laid down under a sea 50 million years ago. Manmade features Despite its natural appearance, many of the Heath’s features are manmade. For example: x x x x The grasslands, for the most part former farm fields, are maintained by cutting (and, until the early 1950s, by sheep grazing), and would become scrub and woodland if not managed (see Figures 15–17) Most of the Highgate and Hampstead Ponds, dating from the late sixteenth to early seventeenth century onwards, were originally dug as reservoirs to supply the City of London The Saxon ditch and adjacent earth bank, known to have existed by AD986, are clearly visible in places. These and other earthworks marked ownership and administrative boundaries The Pound, dating from 1787, was used to store lost and unclaimed grazing animals; a charge was made if owners wanted to reclaim them. 33 Place names The surviving place names on the Heath can provide clues about the past uses of the land. Hampstead itself means a farm site in Anglo-Saxon and was used to describe this land as early as AD956. Highgate was the name given, in the fourteenth century, to the toll gate set up by the Bishop of London, who was lord of the manor of Hornsey. Other names perpetuate earlier owners or inhabitants. The le Goldere family can be found living in the area of Golders Hill in the fourteenth century. The name Kenwood, which was formerly known as Caen Wood, may owe its origin to Bishop Odo, Duke of Caen, and half brother of William the Conqueror, to whom the land was given. There is however an alternative theory that it relates to Reginald Kentwood, who was Dean of St Paul’s in the middle of the fifteenth century and after whom Kentish Town was possibly named. Documented history The documentary sources for the history of Hampstead Heath are rich and varied. For example, there are nearly 70 separate records surviving for the manor of Hampstead. The earliest dates from 1272, during the reign of Edward I. The manor belonged to Westminster Abbey and much of this historical material is still kept in the Muniment Room of the Abbey. But there is other material to be found in the London Metropolitan Archives, the National Archives at Kew and even in the Dorset Record Office in Dorchester. Associations with people and events Gainsborough, Constable, Keats and Coleridge are just some of the artistic and literary celebrities closely associated with the Heath. In 1780, during the Gordon Riots, Londoners took to the streets to protest against emancipation of Catholics. A small mob set off for Kenwood House with the intention of putting to the torch the Earl of Mansfield’s house – he was perceived as being pro-Catholic. They were, however, distracted by the liquid pleasures offered by the landlord of the Spaniards Inn who offered an unlimited bar tab, and promptly sent for the militia. By the time they had arrived, the rioters were in no fit state to put up a fight and were easily dispersed. Significance in the context of London history The period leading up to 1871 has been described as the ‘Guerrilla War’ on the Heath. The owner of Hampstead Manor, Sir Thomas Maryon Wilson, was specifically prevented from selling any of the land or granting building leases by the terms of his inheritance. The common lands of Hampstead manor, extending over part of today’s Heath, were protected from development. In attempts to change his father's will, he presented 15 private bills to Parliament between 1829 and 1866. 34 His attempts at development only served to bind the defenders of the Heath into a coherent and effective body. Sir Thomas Maryon Wilson died in 1869, and his heir, Sir John Maryon Wilson, sold East Heath, Sandy Heath and West Heath to the Metropolitan Board of Works. This was confirmed by the Hampstead Heath Act of 1871. Over the next 100 years the Heath expanded, with many areas saved by local campaigns led by dedicated people. This battle to save the Heath from development was part of a longer-term concern to preserve open spaces within the cities that had grown rapidly in the aftermath of the industrial revolution. Overriding Objective H1 Protect and conserve the historic aspects of the Heath and take due account of the distinctive histories of its component parts. Essential Actions H2 Interpret and make accessible to as wide a public as possible the history of the Heath, and do this in a way that will complement its other distinctive characteristics. H3 Compile an inventory (including assessment of the condition) of the historic features of the Heath and an archive of historic materials (for example maps, photographs and manuscripts). These will assist in historical interpretation. The inventory will feed into a planned and prioritised maintenance programme. H4 Make the link between landscape history and landscape management, so that members of the public can have a greater understanding of current management strategies. 7.1.4 Some historic land management practices known to have been used on the Heath are being re-introduced in carefully chosen areas. These include pollarding, laying hedgerows, heathland restoration, coppicing and annual grass cutting. 7.1.5 The historical resource of the Heath, its changing land ownerships and land uses are recorded and understood better now than during previous management regimes. Nevertheless, this story is not being fully told to Heath users. 35 H5 Historic mapping should be used to help guide management to restore sensitively some elements of the historic landscape where appropriate, for example, some individual trees which indicate former lines of hedgerows and lost ponds. 7.1.6 This does not imply large-scale changes in the balance of the modern habitat mosaic, but a way to reveal lost or blurred landscape features. Equally important is the need to protect habitats for wildlife. H6 Maintain existing views and consider the restoration of lost views where appropriate. 7.1.7 Hampstead Heath is famous for its spectacular or particularly attractive views, for example across central London from Parliament Hill. Some strategic and distinctive views are listed in the Mayor of London’s interim strategic guidance and some in local borough Unitary Development Plans. Views may be internal to the Heath itself, or external, to features outside the Heath. However, views may be lost gradually as the Heath changes, especially as trees grow larger. The maintenance of existing views and the restoration of lost ones should be considered where this does not cause significant damage to other features, such as visually, ecologically or historically important trees. H7 Contribute historical information to a professionally designed and attractive website (see Essential Action E4). H8 Consider establishing a panel of historical advisors to advise the Superintendent on matters relating to history. H9 Encourage a greater involvement of volunteers and local historians in research, production of information (such as themed leaflets) and publications and in guided walks. H10 Consider the provision of better historical information at points of entry to the Heath. H11 Make more of this historical information available outside the Heath, for example at libraries, schools and Tourist Information Centres. Aspirational Goals H12 Consider the establishment of a visitor centre with historical and ecological displays and information about facilities and events (see Aspirational Goal E6). 36 H13 Consider the use of unobtrusive technology for information provision at specific points (see the Kew Gardens example) (see Aspirational Goal E5). H14 Consider the establishment of the post of Heritage Officer to run courses, lead walks, prepare teaching packs, etc. H15 Consider the re-introduction of grazing to restore a part of the lost landscape of the Heath (see Aspirational Goal NL23). H16 Consider undertaking an archaeological survey of the Heath as it is little explored or understood, apart from the major features covered in this chapter. 37 7.2 NATURAL LANDSCAPE Context 7.2.1 What makes Hampstead Heath so important for nature conservation? It is one of London’s most popular open spaces. Remarkable for its size, given that it is less than four miles from Trafalgar Square, it embraces a variety of landscapes with a rich and fascinating history. It is a unique remnant of London’s former countryside, now surrounded by urban development. But unlike much of the countryside around London it is accessible for people to enjoy it. Its woods, grasslands and ponds provide opportunities for quiet enjoyment and appreciation of the natural world in the heart of one of the world’s largest urban areas. Enjoyment of the natural world and landscape must surely be its greatest asset and one that it should be our guiding objective to maintain. 7.2.2 The whole of the Heath has been assessed by the Greater London Authority as being a Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation. A small strip of land is part of the Hampstead Heath Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest as defined by Natural England. 7.2.3 The Heath supports many animals and plants of local, London-wide or even national significance. Examples are seven species of bats, which are nationally protected, several species of spiders which are rare nationally or in London, and good populations of stag beetles and dragonflies. The lesser spotted woodpecker breeds on the Heath at one of its closest locations to central London. Plants such as pignut and heath grass grow in the grassland, and uncommon fungi have been recorded. 7.2.4 There have been dramatic changes across the Heath over the past centuries. Most of the former woodland had been felled by the sixteenth century, and the land was either heathland or farmland. Extensive woodland only returned again when grazing ceased during the past century. Sand and gravel were extracted from the higher elevations; Sandy Heath in particular was devastated by these operations. During the two World Wars parts of the Heath were used for allotments, gun emplacements and for disposal of rubble. Over the years there has been a loss of the heathland once prevalent on the Bagshot Sands, where heather was common. A few remnants still persist, relics from a time when the Heath was truly a heathland community in ecological terms. Similarly, a few patches of acid grassland survive, a relatively scarce habitat in the London area which deserves special measures to ensure its survival (see Figure 18). 38 7.2.5 Examples of features of particular natural interest include: x x x x x x 7.2.6 Approximately 800 identified veteran trees More than 180 recorded species of birds Breeding bird species including kingfisher, reed warbler and sparrowhawk More than 300 recorded species of fungi More than 30 significant ponds The West Heath sphagnum bog is one of only a very few examples of this habitat in London. Two documents provide vital methodology in formulating a strategy for the natural landscape: Grassland Management of Parliament Hill Management Area, Hampstead Heath (2000) and Woodland, Scrub and Hedgerow Management at Parliament Hill Management Area, Hampstead Heath (2001), produced by the London Ecology Unit and the Greater London Authority respectively. 7.2.7 Biodiversity Action Plans for the London Borough of Camden, for London as a whole and for the United Kingdom help prioritise nature conservation management actions. At the time of completion of this management plan there is no Biodiversity Action Plan for the London Borough of Barnet. Overriding Objective NL1 Retain and enhance the Heath’s habitats and natural resources to enable continued quiet enjoyment and appreciation of the natural world by its visitors. Essential Actions NL2 Maintain a detailed vegetation survey of the Heath. 7.2.8 The last, and only comprehensive, vegetation survey of the Heath was produced in 1991. The Heath is very complex, containing small but important pockets of habitat and populations of uncommon species. The detail of the Heath’s habitats will have changed since 1991 and a revision of this survey will be vital for the preparation of Part II of this management plan. NL3 Manage the Heath’s grasslands to enhance their nature conservation and aesthetic value. 39 7.2.9 Varied management regimes can be employed, with, for example, cuts at different frequencies and different times of the year, to encourage a range of grassland species and a range of sward heights and compositions. NL4 Manage the Heath’s woodlands and scrub to enhance their nature conservation value and improve their distinctiveness. 7.2.10 This will include the creation of further woodland glades, which diversify the character of the woodland both visually and for nature conservation. It may include setting aside areas of non-intervention, where no management takes place in the long term except that required for health and safety reasons and, where appropriate, encouraging natural regeneration and planting of native trees. NL5 Manage the Heath’s ponds to enhance their nature conservation value. NL6 Manage the Heath’s hedgerows to enhance their nature conservation value. NL7 Manage the Heath’s heathland and dry acid grassland to enhance their nature conservation value (see Aspirational Goal NL15). NL8 Manage the Heath to protect and enhance populations of plants and animals protected by law, identified as being Priority Species in national and local Biodiversity Action Plans, or identified in subsequent management planning as being worthy of protection. NL9 Retain dead and dying wood wherever possible to encourage invertebrates, fungi and birds. NL10 Use interpretation to explain and make available the Heath’s landscape and wildlife resources to a wide and diverse audience. NL11 Plan for climate change. 7.2.11 The City of London must remain vigilant and responsive to research and advice to ensure that future management creates a Heath flexible enough to absorb whatever changes lie ahead. For example, the managers must be aware of research predicting which species of tree are likely to fare best in the future, and use these in re-stocking if it becomes evident that existing species will no longer thrive under prevailing conditions. Trees not adapted to the new conditions may die. The hydrology of the Heath may alter and lead to 40 ecological changes – perhaps allowing, for example, the expansion of dry acid grassland. Vegetation will be encouraged wherever possible to regenerate naturally from the existing seed-bank. NL12 Monitor changes in the Heath’s ecology (see Aspirational Goal NL16). NL 13 Nurture and retain the Heath’s current veteran trees and identify and plant replacement trees to maintain the overall stock for future generations (see Aspirational Goal NL17). NL14 Control certain invasive and inappropriate species (see Aspirational Goal NL22). Aspirational Goals NL15 Retain, restore and extend areas of heathland and dry acid grassland as functioning, sustainable habitats. 7.2.12 Basic protection of existing areas of heathland and dry acid heathland is essential (see Essential Action NL7). This Aspirational Goal is included to ensure substantial improvements to these habitats. Heathland and dry acid grassland are uncommon and important habitats in London, and are United Kingdom Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Habitats. They exist on similar soils and the two habitats may often be considered together. The existing fragments of heather and gorse on the Heath are attractive, and it is appropriate that further planting be considered to create more viable heathland, especially given Hampstead Heath’s name. Today, fragments of planted heather can be found close to the Vale of Health, around the edges of the West Heath and on Sandy Heath. Acid grassland grows, for example, to the west of the Viaduct Pond and the Hampstead stream. 7.2.13 This project would include research into the most appropriate locations and expanding these important habitats as appropriate. NL16 Prepare detailed plans to monitor changes in the Heath’s ecology. 7.2.14 Basic monitoring is essential (see Essential Action NL12) for sound open space management and already takes place on the Heath. Monitoring is included here as an Aspirational Goal since a more comprehensive monitoring system is sought. The aim is to survey and monitor populations of birds, invertebrates, fungi etc. and to assess changes resulting from, for example, management practices, visitor use, eutrophication due to dog excreta, climate change and 41 other influences. This will lead to improved management of the Heath and, as it could become a site employing monitoring excellence, could contribute to regional and national knowledge of urban open space management. NL17 Prepare detailed plans to nurture and retain the Heath’s current veteran trees and identify and plant replacement trees to maintain and increase the overall stock for future generations. 7.2.15 The conservation of the Heath’s stock of veteran trees is essential (see Essential Action NL13). A more comprehensive project – beyond the bare essentials – is included here as an Aspirational Goal to ensure that the overall stock increases. Veteran trees can suffer and die as a result of a number of causes, such as competition from other trees, compaction due to nearby footpaths and disease. Detailed assessment is required for each tree to ensure optimal management, such as reducing shading and re-routing footpaths. A survey (possibly by volunteers) is required to identify potential veteran trees for the future and appropriate sites for planting new trees. Volunteers, the public and schoolchildren can be involved in gathering suitable seed, to ensure that local stock is used. NL18 Consider providing a substantial, undisturbed area of scrub and bramble on the Heath. 7.2.16 The Heath is heavily used by people and dogs; an undisturbed area of scrub would greatly benefit birds, including some whose numbers are declining nationally and are of conservation concern. This would also benefit invertebrates and small mammals. The scrub will need continuing management to prevent it becoming woodland and to stop it spreading into adjacent areas. NL19 Extend the West Heath sphagnum bog outwards and along the valley to the Leg of Mutton Pond. 7.2.17 From a nature conservation perspective, the West Heath sphagnum bog is one of the most significant parts of the Heath. Enhancement of this rare habitat will contribute significantly to biodiversity in London; in particular, uncommon aquatic vegetation and invertebrates will benefit. NL20 Establish a significant area of reedbed. 7.2.18 Reedbed, dominated by common reed, is one of the most important habitats for nature conservation, as well as being attractive. However, there are no extensive areas of reed on the Heath at present, apart from that on the Bird Sanctuary Pond, which supports reed warbler, an uncommon bird restricted to 42 this habitat. It may be possible to establish another significant area of reedbed on one of the other ponds. A detailed investigation would be required to establish a suitable location. NL21 Identify wildlife habitats and species close to, but outside, the Heath and encourage their protection and enhancement. 7.2.19 There are substantial areas of (mostly private) open space surrounding the Heath, such as large back gardens, golf courses, allotments and railway land, the virtually undisturbed Turner’s Wood behind the Spaniard’s Inn and large numbers of ancient oaks from the former Bishop’s Wood surviving in back gardens north of Hampstead Lane. Some possess nature conservation value and are in some cases remnants of habitats that still exist on the Heath. It is likely that other features of interest remain unrecorded. Protection, enhancement and creation of wildlife habitats would reinforce and help maintain the biodiversity of the area and help wildlife to access, and disperse from, the Heath. This might be implemented through a public campaign ‘Do you have a bit of the Heath in your Garden?’ As well as having a biological benefit, this could be an excellent way to make connections with the local community and develop links with local landowners, residents and others. NL22 Eradicate or control certain invasive and inappropriate species. 7.2.20 Certain species can become invasive and troublesome. They can, for example, dominate less vigorous species and lead to reduction of populations of those species or even cause local extinctions. Terrapins, for example, may threaten populations of ducks, fish and frogs. Giant hogweed, as well as threatening wildlife, is dangerous to the public as it can cause severe burns and blistering. Basic control of invasive and inappropriate species is essential for sound open space management and already takes place on the Heath (see Essential Action NL14). Control is included here as an Aspirational Goal since a concerted effort is required now to remove the threat of some particularly problematic species. Others species that have so far received less attention due to lack of resources also need to be targeted for the first time. NL23 Consider the re-introduction of grazing as a management tool. 7.2.21 This would be of benefit to nature conservation. However, it poses considerable practical problems, such as management and safety of the animals and interaction with people and dogs. Research, trials and public consultation would be needed before grazing could be introduced. 43 7.3 HYDROLOGY Context 7.3.1 Underlying geology determines the location of aquatic habitats on the Heath. On the upper slopes, rain water soaks rapidly through the porous Bagshot Sands. It travels downwards until it meets clay pockets in the Claygate Beds or the impermeable underlying London Clay. It is then forced to flow sideways where it emerges at ground level as springs at the sand-clay junctions. These springs flow into one of four catchments or valleys which run down from the high points along Spaniards Road. 7.3.2 Over time, these streams have been dammed, diverted and interrupted, but the water still flows and must be managed. The creation of the Hampstead and Highgate ponds provided a series of manmade water bodies with considerable ecological, aesthetic and recreational value. Some of these water bodies are classed as reservoirs (Hampstead No. 1, Highgate Men’s Bathing and Model Boating Ponds) and as such they have to satisfy statutory regulations to ensure that they are secure and do not contribute to flooding at times of high rainfall. 7.3.3 Parts of the Heath are underlain by a network of drainage pipes and channels variously designed to take water away from sports pitches, footpaths or especially waterlogged areas. In many cases their condition is unknown and they are not receiving regular maintenance. These pipes and channels need to be mapped and regularly maintained. 7.3.4 Baseline surveys and management recommendations for most of the ponds on the Heath have been recently commissioned from consultants and should be used to formulate an overall strategy for aquatic habitats. 7.3.5 A hydrological and water quality report by Haycock Associates (August 2006) aimed to: x x 7.3.6 Examine the hydrological competency of the existing flow structures between the chains of ponds on Hampstead Heath and provide recommendations for their management Review the water quality of the Swimming Ponds and to make recommendations for their management The report concluded that under the current landscape conditions both the Hampstead and Golders Hill chains risk overflowing at rainfall levels likely to be 44 encountered once in a 100 years, indicating a risk to property in the surrounding area. This risk of over-topping (their dams overflowing), during flood conditions, would increase if there were any blockages along the outflow structures. The City of London recognises the significance of this risk and intends to address the matter. 7.3.7 Different land management scenarios were modelled and it was found that it is possible to reduce the speed at which water and sediment enter the ponds, thus reducing the risk of over-topping. The Haycock Associates report gives more detailed specifications for management action, which need assessing and prioritising. 7.3.8 The report also concluded that high quantities of nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, are deposited on the Heath. Dog fouling is identified as a major contributor to poor water quality. Overriding Objective HY1 Manage the Heath’s ponds and watercourses to enhance their nature conservation value, reduce flood risk and address water quality problems. Essential Actions HY2 Undertake detailed surveys and further data collection and develop an overall management strategy for the ponds on the Heath and their associated watercourses. 7.3.9 Management of the ponds has become increasingly problematic in recent years due to deteriorating water quality and changing weather patterns. The pond catchments are small and the ponds are fed by rainfall and springs which do not sustain a flow of water throughout the year. This means that for up to six months of the year the flow is unreliable. Water levels drop and, during hot weather, there has been an increase in toxic blue-green algae blooms and population explosions of invasive species such as duckweed and water fern. Bacterial counts in the Swimming Ponds are monitored for compliance with the European bathing water standard. In the last few years, there appear to have been more instances of high bacterial levels, particularly in the Ladies’ and Mixed Ponds. Due to the multiple recreational uses of the ponds, there are conflicts between different users which require resolution, such as angling in the Swimming Ponds. 45 7.3.10 An overall strategy is required for the management of each pond to prioritise the programme of works required. More detailed plans for each pond in relation to management of bank side vegetation and the introduction of aquatic flora will be needed in most cases. HY3 Ensure that the stability and levels of the dams which contain the water bodies conform to statutory requirements. 7.3.11 This could require dam stabilisation and structural works. HY4 Map and manage manmade surface water drainage – especially relating to points where pipework is used to drain water alongside and across paths. 7.3.12 Currently some of the pipe work is undersized or blocked. This will need to be replaced or unblocked. HY5 Manage the Heath’s watercourses to slow the flow of water, creating pools and wet flushes to slow the speed at which water and sediment enter the ponds and manage the surface of the Heath to increase water absorption. 7.3.13 Water quality and flood defence benefits run hand in hand with nature conservation benefits to the Heath’s terrestrial and wetland habitats. Various measures are recommended in the Haycock report, including: x x x x x Introducing small-scale interruptions in the stream lines to reduce water flows during high rainfall, such as stacking dead wood across streams to create small dams; these would also increase habitat diversity (while also recognising faster-flowing water as a valuable habitat in its own right) Introducing high infiltration surfaces on footpaths Managing informal paths to reduce their spread during wet weather Seeking measures to de-compact the soil to increase water absorption Converting mown grass to long grass. HY6 Review the fishing policy, ensuring that fishing can take place sustainably on the Heath (See Essential Action P5). HY7 Improve water quality through a range of small-scale management projects. 7.3.14 Some other key contributors to poor water quality are excreta from water birds, uneaten and rotting food that has been fed to birds by visitors, 46 disturbance of sediment by carp and terrapins, anglers’ discarded bait and dog faeces. HY8 Ensure compliance with the European Bathing Water Directive (2006/7/EC). 7.3.15 Recently installed water-mixing equipment may prove inadequate to maintain water quality to a sufficiently high standard in the Swimming Ponds. A more robust suite of measures may be required in the future, including more aeration equipment and/or nutrient-stripping techniques. HY9 Seek to improve water quality by reducing deposits of dog faeces (see Essential Action P4). 7.3.16 The Haycock Associates report demonstrated that dog faeces is a major contributor to poor water quality through surface water run-off. This has a significant negative impact upon the water quality in the Swimming Ponds and upon the Heath’s ecology. The high level of nutrients contributes to reducing the diversity of plant species, since the coarser grasses thrive and crowd out less robust species. 7.3.17 It is essential that deposits of dog faeces are reduced and that all dog walkers recognise the importance of collecting their dogs’ faeces. Zero deposits should be the goal. 47 7.4 DESIGNED LANDSCAPE Context 7.4.1 In addition to the Kenwood Estate (outside the remit of this plan) there are two areas that stand out as discrete and historically important designed landscapes: Golders Hill Park and the Hill Garden and Pergola. They are unique and require a different management approach from the rest of the Heath. Golders Hill Park 7.4.2 The original Golders Hill Estate was probably developed by Charles Dingley in the 1740s. His association with the site was short-lived, however, as soon after the house was built this candidate Member of Parliament was attacked at a political hustings and died several days later. 7.4.3 The long-lasting influence on the park came towards the end of the eighteenth century when John Coore, the next owner of note, sought landscaping advice from Humphry Repton. The last private owner, Sir Spencer Wells, replaced the Georgian mansion with a Victorian equivalent. Wells died in 1897 and the estate was put up for sale. Had the reserve price been attained the park would have been built on. It was not and at a further auction local people secured the land for public use. A garden party attended by 10,000 people raised the money and the park was officially opened in 1898. The house remained until 1941 when it was demolished by a bomb. 7.4.4 Today, the park contains a wide variety of facilities including a zoo, butterfly house, bandstand, tennis courts, play area, café and walled garden with flower beds. It also contains important veteran oak trees, including those formerly part of ancient hedgerows dividing the pre-designed-landscape fields. The Hill Garden and Pergola 7.4.5 In 1904 William H Lever, later Lord Leverhulme, purchased The Hill, a substantial house facing North End Way. He was a noted patron of the arts, architecture and landscape gardening. Enlisting the expertise of Thomas Mawson, the first president of the Institute of Landscape Architects, he set about redesigning the garden and building the monumental Pergola. 7.4.6 Following various changes in ownership, by 1987 the main structure of the Pergola was dilapidated, with original timbers twisted and rotten beyond repair. 48 7.4.7 Upon taking responsibility for the Heath in 1989, the City of London commenced a major programme of restoration. In 1995 the main structure was reopened for public access. 7.4.8 Today, the Hill Garden is one of the capital’s horticultural gems, but it is currently under-used. It is included in the English Heritage Register of Parks and Gardens of special historic interest in England and the Pergola itself is a Listed Grade II* structure. 7.4.9 The Hill Garden and Pergola would provide an attractive location for marriage ceremonies. Work should be carried out to determine the feasibility of and demand for this facility. Overriding Objective D1 Conserve and enhance the historic and planned elements of the Heath’s designed landscapes, while improving their appearance and public facilities. Essential Actions D2 Prepare conservation management plans for Golders Hill Park and the Hill Garden. D3 Explore the education and interpretation opportunities afforded by these unique designed landscapes. D4 Seek to include Golders Hill Park in the English Heritage Register of Parks and Gardens of special historic interest in England. Aspirational Goals D5 Consider the establishment of an information facility in Golders Hill Park, providing visitors with an insight into its history and management. The facility might also reflect the importance and educational potential of Golders Hill Park’s ornamental gardens and horticultural displays by providing gardening advice, for example. D6 Investigate the feasibility of holding marriage and civil partnership services at the Hill Garden and Pergola, recognising that they should not interfere unduly with others’ enjoyment of the Heath. 49 7.5 BUILT ENVIRONMENT Context 7.5.1 The Heath’s buildings have generally not been considered as ‘architecture’ in the context of the Heath; instead they have been provided piecemeal to serve a purpose. There are some examples of very good architecture (of their style and period), such as the Lido and Athletics Track Pavilion, that need to be recognised as such. There are some marvellous, romantic glories such as the Pergola and the Viaduct. Conversely, there are examples of unattractive buildings that may serve a purpose but detract from the natural qualities of the Heath. 7.5.2 A review of the buildings, paths, fences, litter bins, benches, signs and other Heath ‘furniture’ demonstrates that over time the ‘natural’ Heath has acquired an immense diversity of structures and infrastructure (see Figure 19). Where these elements have been planned for, this has usually occurred on an asneeded and localised basis; there has been no overall strategy to guide how such elements might look, their context or what happens to them if they become redundant. 7.5.3 This management review included the compilation of a full inventory of buildings and features, describing what each building or feature is, its age, condition and whether or not it is listed. In addition, a full Condition Survey of all the buildings on the Heath has been prepared, identifying a backlog of maintenance work. Buildings tend to be clustered near entrances and major sports facilities, and generally do not intrude excessively onto the wilder parts of the Heath except with respect to views. 7.5.4 More than 60 structures were identified. These include: Non-public staff buildings utilised for the day-to-day running of the Heath or for staff accommodation (for example Kenwood Nursery Yard buildings, Parliament Hill Staffyard, Meadow Cottage). Public buildings (for example toilets, Lido buildings, cafés, bandstands, zoo buildings). Artefacts and boundary features (for example Stone of Free Speech, Pergola, Flagpole, Viaduct and Bird Bridge). 50 Sports and play facilities (for example Athletics Track, tennis courts, Golders Hill Park and Parliament Hill play areas). Other built infrastructure includes: Car parks, roads and path network. Furniture (for example bins, benches, fences, lighting and signage). Civil engineering works (for example dams, drains, culverts). 7.5.5 There has also been a preliminary study of the use of each building, but this needs further detailed work that will establish whether or not buildings are being used effectively. Some building structures, for example, may be better used to serve other functions; some are under-used and some may be redundant; some need restoring; others need refurbishment and enhancement to meet current users’ expectations. Overriding Objective B1 Provide buildings that are fit for purpose and aesthetically pleasing, enhancing examples of good architecture and seeking to reduce the impact of those that are functional, but detract from the natural qualities of the Heath. Essential Actions B2 Carry out a detailed review of existing buildings. This Buildings Review should include identification of redundant buildings that might be removed and any need for new buildings, new space provision or alternate use of existing buildings. It should identify mismatches and make proposals to re-locate functions where necessary. The aim is that the overall footprint of buildings and their curtilages on the Heath should not increase. 7.5.6 Action B2 will look at the Heath as a whole and provide a list of priorities for future action. It is likely, however, that certain buildings and facilities would come out at the top of this priority list and there is a need to address these problems urgently. Management experience suggests that it is essential to consider the current suitability of, and identify improvements to, the Lido, Athletics Track Pavilion, Heath Maintenance Yards and the location of the Heath Management Team base. These are identified as Aspirational Goals (see Aspirational Goals B10, B11, B12 and B13). 51 B3 Consider, as part of the Buildings Review, whether or not the Heath refreshment facilities are in their optimum locations. 7.5.7 Two cafeterias are provided on the Heath, one at Parliament Hill and the other at Golders Hill Park. There are also facilities for the provision of drinks and snacks during the summer at the Lido and at the Athletics Track, together with a mobile unit by the Parliament Hill play area. B4 Consider, as part of the Buildings Review, the provision of toilet facilities and drinking fountains. Current toilet facilities need improvement. B5 Review the procurement of new buildings or adaptation of existing buildings. New buildings and existing buildings should be considered in context and should strive for high quality architecture which is sustainable, relates to the locality, has stylistic integrity and meets current and future functional needs. 7.5.8 This will allow a move from an impression of a random ‘built environment’ to the concept of a planned ‘architecture’ for the Heath, while ensuring that the buildings fit within the natural aspect of the Heath. B6 Maintain all listed buildings and structures, allowing them to be visible and, where appropriate, interpreted and physically accessible. 7.5.9 Conservation of the built environment should be a fundamental management objective. There are currently 10 listed structures, including the Grade II* Pergola. B7 Develop a planned built environment conservation and maintenance programme. 7.5.10 This will be based on the existing Buildings Inventory and will use the findings of the Buildings Review and Condition Survey. It will need to be a properly funded and sustainable maintenance plan for the buildings, the infrastructure and the maintenance of assets of the Heath for the next 20 years. The Condition Survey needs to be extended to cover other built engineering infrastructure, including those listed in Section 7.5.4. B8 Develop a Design Guide appropriate for the Heath’s ‘countryside’ character. This would be especially aimed at infrastructure other 52 than buildings, but including site furniture, fencing, signage, available technology and path surfaces. 7.5.11 The sense of place and quality of the Heath has been partially eroded by the use of a vast range of styles and materials and sometimes inappropriate street furniture, signage and by the municipal character of its functional buildings and facilities. 7.5.12 Part of the vision is to develop a unified Design Guide for these functional elements so that they are visually incidental and appropriate to the diverse range of natural and formal landscapes within the Heath. The Design Guide should include consideration of the appropriate number of signs at different Heath locations. In some places it may be appropriate to retain or restore existing signs with historical or cultural references. The presentation of Heath entrances is particularly important. B9 Encourage local planning authorities to introduce a more rigorous process to review proposed developments around the Heath, including potential threats to its views and immediately adjacent boundary. 7.5.13 The sense of natural landscape and countryside can be promoted within the Heath, but built development adjacent to, or visible from, the Heath can threaten this sanctuary – for example the visual impact of the Royal Free Hospital. 7.5.14 Camden Council’s Policies for the Fringes of the Heath proposed a Special Policy Area in 1981. The document was only advisory and is no longer used. There is a need to work more closely with all interested organisations and key partners including the local planning authorities, Camden and Barnet, English Heritage and local amenity societies, including the Heath and Hampstead Society and the Highgate Society, to identify potential threats and benefits and actively to advocate mitigation or objection to such proposals. 7.5.15 The method for commenting on adjacent developments through the planning process needs to be reviewed. Working relationships with the Hampstead Conservation Area Advisory Committee, the Highgate Conservation Area Advisory Committee, the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area Advisory Committee and the Mansfield Conservation Area Advisory Committee should be considered. Strategic and distinctive views need to be recognised (see Essential Action H6). 53 7.5.16 The consultation preceding publication of this document showed that Heath users strongly believe that the Heath should be protected from inappropriate developments around its boundaries. Aspirational Goals B10 Lido x x x x x x B11 Athletics Track Pavilion and Sports Changing Rooms x x x B12 Bring underused parts of the building into use Restore the historic fabric and emphasise the architectural quality of the building Consider the future of the existing café Seek Heritage Lottery Fund grant support to execute the works Review parking arrangements and adjust as necessary (there is currently visual intrusion to the main façade) Consider (longer term) warming the water in winter by undertaking a feasibility study to see if it is required or cost-effective. Review all the buildings at the Athletics Track and the sports changing rooms Restore the Pavilion to emphasise its architectural quality Redesign the other buildings to provide required facilities without detracting from the core historic building. Heath Maintenance Yards Rationalise and reorganise the Heath Maintenance Yards to ensure they are fit for purpose and environmentally sustainable. B13 Heath Management Team Base Relocate the Heath Management Team base to a site on or adjacent to the Heath. B14 Parliament Hill Fields Improve the natural appearance of this area and enhance it as the major gateway to the Heath. This will include the entrances from Highgate Road, Gordon House Road, Savernake Road and Nassington Road. 54 B15 Hill Garden, Pergola and Pitt Arch Restore and refurbish the Hill Garden and Pergola, the Hill Garden Shelter and the Pitt Arch. B16 East Heath Review and, as necessary, enhance the entrance to East Heath (Lower Fairground and South End Green) and its facilities. There is a perception that this busy entrance to the Heath is unattractive and does not provide the appropriate welcome to visitors. 55 7.6 INFORMAL PUBLIC USE Context 7.6.1 The Heath’s main users are those who come for informal activity. By far the highest percentage of these come to walk (with or without dogs). Others come to run, to enjoy nature, the views, to sunbathe, to picnic and to meet friends. 7.6.2 These activities do not necessarily require direct staff input but do have a considerable impact on the fabric of the Heath and require equal consideration in the management plan (see Figure 20). Problems of compaction and disturbance to wildlife, for example, are emerging and need to be addressed. There are conflicts between users which need to be managed (see Overriding Objective P1). x Walking: Walking is the most common activity on Hampstead Heath. Visitors are free to roam over the Heath and all parts are used for walking. There are more than 100 kilometres of paths on the Heath. Even people who visit for other activities will almost always walk at some point in their visit to the Heath. A Heath visitor survey showed that 57% of respondents normally travel to the Heath on foot and that the most popular activity done when on the Heath was walking (55%). (GfK NOP, Hampstead Heath Visitor Survey, September 2006). The benefits of walking, particularly brisk walking, for physical health, mental wellbeing and recovery from ill-health are well known. The reasons for walking are varied. It can be carried out principally for exercise, carried out as part of other activities (for example transport, bird watching) or as a social activity, helping to bind the Heath community together. Walking is the ultimate form of ‘green transport’ and its promotion can help with Hampstead Heath sustainability targets. x Dog walking: This is one of the most popular and widespread activities. The company of a dog allows some people, especially women, to feel safe on the Heath. It encourages many other people to take regular exercise and therefore promotes fitness. Control of dogs to protect visitors and wildlife and management of dog faeces are issues that need to be addressed. Some dogs, whether individually or as part of large groups, are clearly not kept under close control at all times. 56 x Picnicking: This is a popular activity in the summer months but generates large quantities of litter and increasingly damage to grassland from portable barbeques. x Fishing: Six ponds on the Heath are designated for fishing (outside the close season, which is 15th March – 15th June). These are: Hampstead No. 2 and No. 3 Ponds, Highgate No. 2 and No. 3 Ponds, Vale of Health Pond and the Viaduct Pond. Anglers must hold a current Environment Agency Licence and have a permit. There are issues to be addressed in relation to water quality and conflict with swimmers and wildlife. x Horse riding: There are two designated rides on the Heath, one on the Heath Extension and one on South Meadow (the latter requires a permit). Neither is a bridleway. These rides are used but the demand for horse riding is low and there are no plans to extend the present network. x Model boating: Model power boats (except those with internal combustion engines) may be used on Highgate No. 3 Pond during specified periods. There is a requirement that anyone operating a model power boat must be fully insured and observe certain other conditions. This activity can cause disturbance to birds, particularly during the breeding season. However, few people now use model boats. x Birdwatching: Hampstead Heath is renowned as one of the country’s best places to see a wide range of relatively common birds close up. The public can enjoy unparalleled views of impressive species such as kestrels, green woodpeckers, kingfishers and jays. Parliament Hill is a good place to watch migrating birds, such as swallows and house martins in the autumn. The diversity of habitats contributes to the diversity of bird life. A limited number of enclosures are essential to protect these species from disturbance. x Kite flying: Kite flying is a traditional and popular pastime on Parliament Hill. This needs to be monitored in relation to safety issues. x Cycling on Designated Routes: There are four permitted, shared use cycle routes. Conflicts between cyclists and pedestrians arise owing to: - Shared use of paths Some cyclists exceeding the speed limit Some cyclists venturing off the permitted cycle routes. 57 There are different bodies of opinion that would like to see: - All cycling banned from the Heath to conserve its tranquillity The situation to remain as it is The introduction of additional cycle routes – in particular to improve off-road cycle access from north to south, to improve offroad cycle access for children cycling to school and to provide safe off-road cycle access for recreation. In 2002 consultants were commissioned to review cycling on the Heath. They were asked to consider if there should be additional permitted cycle routes, especially to tie in with the existing cycle networks surrounding the Heath. The conclusion was that an additional permitted route, entering at Gospel Oak, could be considered further, but that any other improvements should take place outside the Heath on existing highways. Following detailed consideration, the Hampstead Heath Management Committee decided not to increase the number of permitted cycle routes. This issue is being reviewed, consulting as widely as possible. This review must tie-in with the Traffic Management Review (see Aspirational Goal A10). x Swimming and bathing: swimming and bathing could be considered as either informal public uses or as sports. They are considered within this document in the Sports chapter as they are formal, in that they require specific facilities and direct staff resources through life-guarding. Children’s Play 7.6.3 All parts of Hampstead Heath are used by children for informal play. There are four major dedicated play areas, all free of charge: x x x x 7.6.4 The Parliament Hill Playground and paddling pool The Peggy Jay Centre One O’clock Club (for fives and under) The Adventure Playground The Golders Hill Park play area. All except the Golders Hill Park play area are staffed. Programmed activities for school groups and for children on non-school days are organised at the Adventure Playground. 58 7.6.5 There are four other play areas which are specifically provided for the use of parents with very young children: at Parliament Hill, near the Vale of Health, the Heath Extension and Willow Road. These are enclosed to provide a safe and secure environment for the children and, in particular, to ensure that the areas are kept dog free. 7.6.6 During the school holidays each summer, an extremely popular free programme of events for children is organised and held at Golders Hill Park and at Parliament Hill. 7.6.7 A youth workshop, held as part of the consultation process, produced some exciting ideas relating to leisure and play facilities, art, sport and the natural Heath. Further discussion should take place with young people to see if any of these ideas can be turned into projects. Golders Hill Park Zoo and Deer Enclosure 7.6.8 The Zoo and Deer Enclosure at Golders Hill Park is a popular and improving facility. It is of educational value for local schools. The standard of the facilities provided for the animals is subject to regular inspection by the licensing authority, the London Borough of Barnet. A new butterfly house, also in Golders Hill Park, provides additional interest for the visitor. Events, Filming and Entertainments 7.6.9 A programme of events and entertainment runs throughout the year on Hampstead Heath including a diverse range of concerts (on the bandstands at Parliament Hill and Golders Hill Park), fun fairs and children’s summer entertainments. 7.6.10 Other main events include the Duathlon, cross-country running, Race for Life, conker championship, open-air ice-skating at Parliament Hill and the annual visit of the circus. Regular walks throughout the year and nature-spotting events are also organised. 7.6.11 Staff, supported by volunteers, generally run events. An annual diary of events is published and is available through local outlets. 7.6.12 The Heath is used for art exhibits, and in summer 2005 Parliament Hill Fields provided the setting for The Writer – a nine-metre high sculpture by the artist Giancarlo Neri, attracting many visitors. 7.6.13 The Heath is a very popular location for all types of filming. 59 Fairs 7.6.14 There is a long established tradition of fairs on the Heath, with fairs taking place on three occasions each year. 7.6.15 There are two fairground sites on the Heath, located at East Heath Road and Spaniards Road. There are no plans to extend the areas given over to the fairs, nor to increase the number of fairs held each year. Sexual Activity 7.6.16 No activity of a sexual nature will be tolerated on the Heath where it could cause public offence. 7.6.17 The West Heath has a reputation as a public sex environment. There are also issues in the nude sunbathing compound at the Men’s Pond that cause public concern and require management attention. 7.6.18 A major problem is the large quantity of waste on the West Heath which takes two full-time members of staff to remove. 7.6.19 In 2002 the Sexual Activity Working Group was established bringing together the City of London, the Metropolitan Police, the Healthy Gay Living Centre, members of the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender community, members of the Heath and Hampstead Society and other representatives of the local community. 7.6.20 The group meets regularly, walks parts of the Heath, and tries to find ways to ensure that sexual activity does not discourage public access to any part of the Heath. The Heath Constabulary has forged links with the Terence Higgins Trust and Central London Action and Street Health. They undertake outreach sessions and discuss issues and solutions. There have been incidents of homophobic crime and the group encourages reporting of this crime. 7.6.21 The Sexual Activity Working Group believes that this collaborative approach is the best way forward with regard to this sensitive issue. Overriding Objective P1 Recognise that the Heath’s main users are those who come for informal activity and manage informal recreational activities to 60 ensure that as far as is reasonably practical they do not adversely affect others’ enjoyment of or the natural aspect of the Heath. Essential Actions P2 Carry out surveys to establish who uses the Heath and obtain accurate information about numbers of visitors. P3 Review the Heath’s litter collection and waste management practices, including encouraging visitors to take their rubbish away. 7.6.22 The consultation preceding publication of this document showed that Heath users strongly believe that the Heath should be kept clean and free from litter. P4 Review dog walking, developing a Dog Code to address the conflicts that can arise through lack of control and negligence in collecting dog faeces. P5 Review the fishing policy, ensuring that fishing can take place sustainably on the Heath, providing anglers with a quality recreational experience while not conflicting with the Heath’s natural aspect and others’ enjoyment of it. Issues to be considered include stock management, water quality, multiple use of ponds by anglers, swimmers and wildfowl. P6 Commission a further review of cycling on the Heath and its immediate environs, recognising the strength of feeling both for and against cycling and making links to the Traffic Management Review (see Aspirational Goal A10). Provide cycle racks at suitable locations. P7 Balance the interests of recreation and ecological value/landscape character, including the protection of sensitive habitats, through careful management techniques including dead hedging and judicious planting. This will assist the Heath’s ability to absorb the enormous number of visitors that it attracts. P8 Manage events, filming and fairs to ensure that there is no long-term damage to the landscape fabric of the Heath and minimise disruption to local communities. P9 Work with members of the community, the Sexual Activity Working Group, the Metropolitan Police Service and others to reduce conflict between Heath users. 61 Aspirational Goals P10 Enhance the Golders Hill Park Zoo and Deer Enclosure through the production and implementation of a management plan to meet the requirements of the zoo licence and develop its infrastructure, collection and interpretation. 62 7.7 SPORTS Context 7.7.1 The Heath is a popular open space for organised sport as well as for informal recreation. There is no doubt that the special character of the Heath will continue to attract large numbers of visitors, particularly as the need to escape from the stresses of modern urban life increases. The Heath’s proximity to central London puts it within reach of a large potential audience. 7.7.2 National and regional policy statements highlight the importance of sport in open spaces and facilities such as are found on Hampstead Heath. Examples of such statements are: x x x x Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Strategy Unit, Game Plan strategy document, 2002 Department of Health, White Paper, Choosing Activity: a physical activity action plan, 2005 Sport England, The London Plan for Sport and Physical Activity, 2004 – 2008, 2004 Greater London Authority, Offside – the Loss of London’s Playing Fields, 2006. 7.7.3 Some of the sporting activities have a high reputation and profile regionally and nationally. For example, Hampstead Heath is traditionally regarded throughout the country as the home of cross-country running. 7.7.4 With a lack of open space in neighbouring boroughs, the Heath has a crucial role to play in providing sporting opportunities and promoting good health, community cohesion and improvements to the quality of life. Of the four London Boroughs closest to the Heath, three are in the top ten for poor health in the capital: Camden, Islington and Haringey (2001 Census). Without Heath facilities, including outdoor grass pitches and the Athletics Track, many primary and secondary schools would not be able to provide key sports activities as part of a physical education programme. There are particularly strong links with the four local secondary schools – Parliament Hill, William Ellis, Acland Burghley and La Sainte Union Catholic – indeed, Heath staff presently assist William Ellis School in the development of the major part of their physical education curriculum activities. 63 7.7.5 More than 40 different schools have booked Heath sports facilities in the past two years; more than 80 different sports clubs have booked Heath sports facilities in the past two years. There are approximately 215,000 visits made to the Swimming Ponds each year. There were approximately 75,000 visits made to the Lido in the summer of 2006. 7.7.6 This section specifically refers to the sports and activities that require active management. At least 16 sports take place on the Heath: athletics, bowls, cricket, cross-country running, duathlon, fitness training, football, golf practice and putting, hockey, orienteering, petanque, rounders and softball, rugby, swimming, tennis and water polo. 7.7.7 The City of London recognises the difference between swimming (active exercise) and bathing (passive immersion). However, for simplicity this document uses ‘swimming’ to include swimming and bathing. 7.7.8 Some of the sporting activities and associations on Hampstead Heath have a very long history. Many sports have established clubs and a recognised voice. 7.7.9 Open-air swimming on the Heath is long established and takes place at the Men’s Pond, the Ladies’ Pond, the Mixed Pond and the Lido. The formal opening of the Men’s Pond took place in 1890, although open-air swimming on the Heath long pre-dates this. The Hampstead Heath Winter Swimming Club self-regulates winter swimming at the Mixed Pond. A detailed description of the swimming facilities and their management can be found in Sports Baseline Condition and Management Issues (Land Use Consultants, 2006) and Sport on Hampstead Heath (Sports Working Group, 2006). 7.7.10 The Swimming Ponds are internationally famous. The Men’s Pond and the Ladies’ Pond are unique in the United Kingdom in being the only life-guarded open-water swimming facilities open to the public every day of the year. They are attractive to swimmers of all ages and backgrounds for various reasons, including their chemical-free water, lack of artificial heating and beautiful surroundings. The Ladies’ Pond provides a unique, secluded retreat for female swimmers. In the summer many families come to swim in the Mixed Pond. The Men’s Pond provides a male-only swimming environment. The Ponds attract many visitors from London and even overseas. Approximately 100 ‘regulars’ swim in the Ponds throughout the year. 7.7.11 The Swimmers’ Forum was established in 2005 and allows representatives of the swimmers to discuss issues of concern. The Forum has proved very useful in this respect. It is a valuable addition to the Heath’s consultation process and may act as a good model for similar interest groups elsewhere on the Heath. 64 Overriding Objective S1 Work collaboratively in maintaining and developing the existing sports facilities and activities in response to changing demands ensuring appropriate provision for all sections of the community. Essential Actions S2 Promote and provide for managed sports activities in three identified Sports Areas: x x x Parliament Hill area (Sports Area A) The Heath Extension (Sports Area B) North end of Golders Hill Park (Sports Area C). (See Figure 21) S3 Establish a Sports Advisory Forum to advise the Superintendent on sporting matters. S4 Promote and provide for managed swimming facilities at the Swimming Ponds and the Lido. S5 Allow alteration of existing sports facilities or the creation of new sports facilities within the identified Sports Areas subject only to the following considerations: x x x There is no threat to public safety It is consistent with good turf management practice There would be no significant increase in noise or light pollution affecting neighbouring residents. 7.7.12 Other than pond swimming, the only sports that take place outside the Sports Areas at the date of this management plan are cross-country, orienteering, fitness training, a charity event (Race for Life) and the Duathlon. With new sports emerging and/or an excess demand for the current facilities at some future time, consideration may need to be given for sports to take place outside the Sports Areas. S6 Allow sports to take place outside the identified Sports Areas only if all the following eight criteria are fulfilled: 65 1. The new sport or relocation of an existing sport is recommended by the Sports Advisory Forum following an assessment of perceived demand. 2. The sport cannot be accommodated within one of the Sports Areas. 3. There is no significant detriment to the general public’s enjoyment of the Heath. 4. There is no significant threat to the natural Heath. 5. The practice of the new sport or new location does not expose the City of London to a material risk of criminal or civil liability, and is permitted by the City’s insurers. 6. The adverse impact, if any, on established informal sport in the relevant area must be outweighed, in the view of the Sports Advisory Forum, by the demand for, and public benefit of, the new or relocated sport. 7. It is consistent with good turf management practice. 8. No permanent structures are needed by the sport in question. S7 Develop the role of sporting facilities in providing opportunities to promote good health, community cohesion, social inclusion, quality of life and lifelong learning. 7.7.13 Sports facilities on the Heath should be available to a broader spectrum of users, including young people, families, disabled people and others. 7.7.14 The Heath should encourage more use of its diverse facilities and in doing so promote healthier life and fitness through sports. It should collaborate with the London Boroughs of Camden, Barnet, Islington and Haringey to help them provide a service where they are currently unable to do so using their own facilities. Links should also be made with local primary care trusts to promote use of the Heath and its facilities. S8 Encourage and support connections with surrounding schools and the provision of proper sports instruction. S9 Set up systems to monitor patterns of use, so as to better identify opportunities for increased or improved use. 66 S10 Explore the establishment of a club to encompass a range of Heath sports – an Umbrella Sports Club. S11 Work in partnership with other agencies to develop opportunities to realise the sporting and wider cultural opportunities of the 2012 Olympics. For example, local sports events could be held during the Olympics to take advantage of heightened interest. Aspirational Goals S12 See Aspirational Goals B10 relating to the Lido and B11 relating to the Athletics Track Pavilion and the Sports Changing Rooms. 67 7.8 ACCESS AND EDUCATION ACCESS AND INCLUSIVITY 7.8.1 The benefits of improving access go beyond meeting legal requirements. It is an opportunity to attract new audiences, increase the likelihood of repeat visits and improve the quality of experience for all visitors. Access improvements should be planned to respect the special qualities of a particular site4. The City of London will adhere to the principles of equal opportunity and access for all. 7.8.2 There is a need to attract groups of people currently under-represented on the Heath. The City of London aims to be as inclusive as possible and to pursue initiatives that will increase the Heath’s availability and diversity of users. At present there are barriers that make it difficult for some people to use the Heath. Some of the barriers are physical, such as busy road crossings and lack of clear signage. Others are more cultural and include the perception amongst some people that the Heath is not theirs and that they are in some way not welcome. The development of an Access Plan will assist in identifying such barriers and identifying priorities. 7.8.3 The Disability Discrimination Act guidance to make buildings as accessible as possible has been followed to some extent. Further work is required to improve access to the wider open space and to some facilities. It is recognised that public authorities must be proactive in helping disabled people, who want, and have the right, to enjoy the best landscapes. 7.8.4 The working groups have suggested that there is a need to attract a broader spectrum of users and current non users. 7.8.5 Part II of the management plan will need to develop proposals to monitor and manage the impact of large numbers of visitors on the fabric of the Heath. 7.8.6 Any measures to improve physical access, such as resurfacing of paths, need to adhere to the principles developed in the Design Guide (See Essential Action B8). 4 Easy Access to Historic Landscapes, English Heritage, 2005 68 7.8.7 The ability to access the Heath easily by public transport is an important part of promoting sustainable use of the Heath. It is essential to improve relationships with service providers such as Transport for London and local authorities to promote sustainable transport links to the Heath and to provide appropriate signage at train stations and bus stops. The potential for a significant increase in visitors, resulting from proposals to increase train frequency on the ‘London Overground’ North London Railway, needs to be considered. 7.8.8 In addition, reducing the impact of traffic and the infrastructure that attends the public highway offers opportunities to reconnect parts of the Heath that have become detached. One prime example is Whitestone Pond, where the quantity and visual impact of traffic dominates; another is the physically divisive nature of Spaniards Road. It is proposed that a Traffic Management Review be undertaken in partnership with other interested organisations to explore opportunities to reduce barriers to access. It will also afford the opportunity to determine whether there is any potential to increase cycling on routes outside the Heath, thereby reducing pressure on the Heath itself. Community Safety 7.8.9 It is important that visitors feel safe and secure on the Heath and the Heath Constabulary provide an essential service, engendering a sense of well-being. The consultation preceding publication of this document identified the need to feel safe on Hampstead Heath as a major requirement for many visitors. A concern over safety was cited by non-users as a reason for never having been to the Heath. 7.8.10 The Constabulary aims to provide a professional and efficient service for Hampstead Heath, seeking to ensure that the Heath remains free from antisocial behaviour and the fear of crime. 7.8.11 The Constabulary patrols on foot, by bicycle and in vehicles. The presence of the Constabulary and many other patrolling staff acts as a great reassurance for Heath users. A 2004 Greater London Authority survey undertaken by MORI, for example, found that 9 out of 10 London women said that regular foot patrols by police, community wardens or park attendants make them feel safer in parks. The Heath Constabulary provides cover from early morning to late at night, every day of the year. 7.8.12 The Heath and its users are protected by a series of byelaws first introduced by the London County Council in 1932. All constables are attested to enforce byelaws in a Magistrates Court. 69 7.8.13 The Constabulary enforces the byelaws, protects the Heath and its users and provides a response to any incident that may threaten the enjoyment of users of the Heath. 7.8.14 A protocol is maintained with the Metropolitan Police Service which defines roles and responsibilities for the Heath Constabulary. 7.8.15 The Constabulary aims to encourage compliance through informal methods including education, prevention and community relations. Where possible, this approach avoids formal tactics associated with traditional police strategies, such as arrests or verbal warnings. 7.8.16 The Constabulary increasingly uses outreach methods, forging links with local schools and holding crime-prevention events. Currently there are a number of Safer Neighbourhood Teams that have been established by the Metropolitan Police Service around the Heath. The purpose of these teams is to give local communities a real influence in helping to determine day-to-day policing issues. 7.8.17 Constabulary officers attend some local Safer Neighbourhood Team meetings, and a number of successful operations have been co-ordinated with the Metropolitan Police Service as a result of concerns expressed by the local community. To ensure a more integrated approach to policing the Heath, engaging with Heath users and determining policing priorities, there is a need to link more effectively with the new community policing structures. Overriding Objective A1 Recognise the need to be as inclusive as possible, increasing the Heath’s availability to a diversity of users. Essential Actions A2 Prepare an Access Plan to ensure that as far as is practicably possible all members of the public shall have access to all parts of the Heath unless there is good reason to prevent such access, for example, to prevent disturbance to ecologically sensitive areas and prevent access to operational buildings. 7.8.18 Improved access and opportunities should be provided for people who do not fully utilise the Heath and its facilities or are not consulted. This may include ethnic minorities, older people and disabled people. 70 7.8.19 Where fences are necessary to restrict access or paths surfaced to provide access, the materials and design used will comply with a Design Guide (see Essential Action B8). A3 Address the barriers to access and comply with the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (as amended). 7.8.20 The City of London wishes to achieve the highest standard of accessibility and inclusion and must comply with the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (as amended) and the relevant Statutory Codes of Practice in managing the Heath and making it accessible to the members of the public, including disabled people. In so doing, the City of London has a general duty to have due regard to disability equality, and additionally not to discriminate against disabled people, that is not to treat them less favourably without reasonable justification and to take reasonable steps to make the Heath, and its facilities, accessible. The City of London must be proactive in ensuring that the Heath is reasonably accessible to everyone, including disabled people. The City of London will consult with interested groups and consider partnership working as part of assessing and addressing barriers to access. There are many potential organisations and target groups; among them are The Fieldfare Trust for learning and/or physically disabled people, Royal National Institute for the Blind and Disability in Camden. A4 Undertake a disability and access audit for the wider Heath and prepare, and update as required, an access map for the Heath. 7.8.21 This may result in suggested routes around the Heath and suggested routes to the Heath from public transport links, provision of information etc. A5 Consider the preparation of an Audience Development Plan5. 7.8.22 An Audience Development Plan could include an analysis of the current audience, identification of barriers to involvement of some people, an assessment of the potential for audience development and identification of priority audiences, etc. It might lead to partnership working with other organisations, such as the Black Environmental Network. 7.8.23 The Heath is a remarkable resource that could be made available to a wider public. This sentiment resonated through all the working groups. The sense 5 An Audience Development Plan is required by the Heritage Lottery Fund in preparation for a Heritage Grant. ‘Audience Development Plans, helping your application,’ produced by the Heritage Lottery Fund, gives a definition of an audience, audience development and an Audience Development Plan. Essentially, the latter aims to understand visitors’ needs and to create an environment and experience that appeals to them. 71 was not necessarily to increase the Heath’s profile as a tourist attraction, but to make better use of under-developed resources, for example to increase volunteer opportunities. A6 Recognise the Heath’s latent potential to provide: x x x x x x A broader spectrum of users from all backgrounds Access to managed facilities that are not fully used at present Recognition of the Heath’s history Access to the natural environment Improvements to health and well-being Education for sustainable development. A7 Work with service providers such as Transport for London and local authorities to improve directional signage outside the Heath and highlight the best routes from existing public transport links, since it is highly desirable that visitors to the Heath come by public transport. A8 Develop a strategy, in conjunction with Heath Hands, to provide more inclusive volunteering opportunities and to ensure that the value of volunteering, both for the Heath and for individuals, is fully recognised. 7.8.24 Heath Hands is the Heath volunteer organisation based at Kenwood West Lodge. It aims to help in the conservation and improvement of the Heath environment, provide recreational and vocational opportunities, promote environmental education, improve the Heath for visitors and give those who enjoy the Heath an opportunity to make a difference. Heath Hands attracts a wide age-range of volunteers from across London and beyond. A9 Consider the possibility of linking the Heath Constabulary and Heath users with the community Safer Neighbourhood model established by the Metropolitan Police Service. Aspirational goals A10 Traffic Management Review Undertake a Traffic Management Review to consider, in partnership with others, initiatives to reduce the impact of both moving traffic and the infrastructure that attends the public highway, since part of most visitors’ arrival at the Heath involves crossing or walking 72 alongside busy main roads. This might include consideration of many proposals such as: x x x x Reconnect Whitestone Pond to the Heath and seek to reduce the quantity and visual impact of the traffic. Spaniards Road could afford spectacular views across the City. At present it is a traffic corridor with no respect for its setting. A few strategically planned openings could be created by careful tree removal. Address the fact that local roads are often very busy, some with fast-moving vehicles, and can be unpleasant to cross or walk alongside. Build a pedestrian tunnel under Spaniards Road and a pedestrian bridge across the cutting in North End Way. Additionally, the Review should address the following issues: x x x x x x x x Pedestrian entry points and the conflict between pedestrians and delivery vehicles (especially at Parliament Hill depot) The potential for coach and other vehicle drop-off area(s) for schools visits and sports events, accessible transport providers and individuals dropping off, or picking up, disabled people The provision and management of car parking The potential for increasing visits by public transport, for example liaison with Transport for London The opportunity to develop a strategic green network of open space from the south side of the Heath to Kentish Town and beyond, utilising land adjacent to the railways The vehicle fleet, with a view to minimising the visual and physical presence of vehicles and minimising path erosion (for example using low-impact vehicles ), utilising sustainable energy (for example using biofuels and electric vehicles) and with a goal of reducing motorised staff and delivery transport and all vehicular transport to a minimum The need for reasonable compliance with the recommendations of the Disability Discrimination Act, 1995 The potential to increase cycling on routes outside the Heath, thereby reducing pressure on the Heath. The Traffic Management Review should consider the value of producing a Travel Plan, which would pull together proposals to 73 increase sustainable transport to the Heath by walking, cycling and use of public transport6. It should be recognised that more than any other suggested Essential Action or Aspirational Goal, A10 requires the involvement and cooperation of a wide range of partners. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION 7.8.25 The working groups have suggested that there was a need to explain more through interpretation and directional signage 7.8.26 The Heath has the potential to provide increased opportunities for education. It also has the potential to be used to satisfy statutory provisions and current Government objectives across a range of areas. 7.8.27 Hampstead Heath is already a well-used and valued resource for local schools. Its education staff have strong links with many primary schools and are improving existing links with secondary schools and colleges of further education. There is a partnership agreement with the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds to provide environmental education. An education strategy (2007–09), details plans for developing the Heath’s educational value. 7.8.28 Education also has the potential to develop understanding of the Heath, engender a sense of ownership and enhance a caring attitude and respect for the Heath and can help reduce anti-social behaviour and vandalism. 7.8.29 Volunteering is a rewarding way for some people to access and learn about the Heath, while at the same time making a positive contribution to its upkeep. 7.8.30 Heath Hands (see Section 7.8.24) plays a significant role in delivering interpretation and education on Hampstead Heath. 7.8.31 Other local volunteers and groups give guided walks on the Heath on all aspects of history and ecology, notably the Heath and Hampstead Society, which runs a regular programme. Overriding Objective E1 Develop the Heath’s potential for education and interpretation. 6 A Travel Plan is a package of measures and initiatives that aim to reduce the number of car journeys made, by providing people with greater choice. 74 Essential Actions E2 Improve information on maps at site entrances. The website and published leaflets should carry accessibility information. Consider specific publications for those with mobility or other access problems. 7.8.32 A variety of publications and other information including the Hampstead Heath Diary is available at a range of outlets including libraries, community and leisure centres. It is important to find ways of communicating information and key messages about the Heath to local people as well as visitors. At the major ‘gateways’ to the Heath the provision of information would help to introduce visitors to the special qualities of the Heath. Management experience suggests that this action is required, independent of the findings of the Interpretation Plan (see Essential Action E4). E3 Increase outreach work to schools and other community groups. 7.8.33 Topics that offer an opportunity to tie in with the National Curriculum include the natural environment, history and sports. 7.8.34 Other educational opportunities include: x x x x x Web-based learning initiatives, including facilitation of self-guided school visits, inset training and individual student research The education/interpretation value of Golders Hill Park and the Zoo, the Hill Garden and other Heath attractions and locations should be developed. There are significant opportunities to deliver secondary, further and higher level education. Survey and research projects, for example, are attractive to students and help with Heath management. Education establishments at all levels already see Heath Hands as an ideal way of introducing students of all ages to volunteering. Informal environmental education opportunities, outside of school and college, are currently delivered as a wildlife club and weekend/holiday events. Out-of-school youth projects should be developed. Education programmes should be offered to specialist groups such as adults with special needs or learning difficulties, people with mental health problems, young people, ethnic minority groups, refugee and asylum seekers, and the early years. The development of partnerships working with primary care trusts may provide opportunities to reach these groups. The Adventure Playground and One O’Clock Club facilities need to integrate environment education further into their activities. This should 75 be achieved by training existing staff and developing the outside play areas to complement the programme. E4 Develop an Interpretation Plan to consider what needs to be interpreted, to whom, where and how. x x x x Advertise general knowledge about the Heath and its facilities such as booking, charges and opening hours, how to get there, provision for disabled people etc. Research the most effective media for communicating with the public, off and on the Heath. These may include the website and the use of technology, schools, libraries and tourist information, leaflets, welcome boards at entrances, newspapers, visitor centre and cafés etc. Increase interpretation of subjects including history, natural environment, topography, geology, hydrology, flora and fauna, buildings, sporting facilities, why management and intervention are necessary etc. Establish a more proactive press relations programme to ensure that the public hears about the many positive stories that emanate from the Heath. 7.8.35 Although much of the information that will be used for interpretation already exists, there will still be a need for further research and the development of appropriate texts. The History Working Group have proposed working with locally based historians. There may be other appropriate resources, for example through Heath Hands and London Natural History Society, which should be explored. 7.8.36 Provision of information must be balanced with preservation of the natural aspect of the Heath. 7.8.37 It is likely that some help will be required from appropriately qualified professionals. Aspirational Goals E5 Information Technology Undertake a feasibility study, linked with the Interpretation Plan, to develop systems of information delivery using technology. 76 This system will utilise technology to provide information from a number of sources including websites, publications, the Hampstead Heath Diary, timetables and audio tours, together with a direct line to the Heath Constabulary. E6 Visitor centre Undertake a feasibility study to identify the need for a dedicated visitor centre, what it should contain and where it should be located. This should tie in with the Buildings Review. (see Essential Action B2 and Aspirational Goal H12). E7 Develop Hampstead Heath publications: x Linked to education and interpretation of the Heath, appropriate publications should be made available on site and in local libraries, bookshops etc. x This should include general information leaflets, education packs, postcards and books. 77 8. IMPLEMENTATION AND PRIORITISATION 8.1 The Essential Actions listed in the sections of Chapter Seven will need to be prioritised and integrated into a series of agreed medium term action plans that form an integral part of the business planning process. In addition, detailed annual work programmes will be produced. Some of the Essential Actions can only be achieved with the support of other organisations. A longer term action plan will enable other organisations to integrate priority proposals into their own programmes. 8.2 A number of further studies and reviews will be needed to help to shape priorities and projects. 8.3 Some projects may need to be undertaken to halt the decline in the condition of the Heath. Other projects may be able to progress as opportunities arise; the need to react to these will require a flexible approach. Concern for the significance of heritage and the possibility of attracting new audiences will be important factors in trying to determine priorities and will be a pre-requisite of attracting external funding, particularly from the Heritage Lottery Fund. Resources 8.4 Although a number of projects can be achieved utilising in-house resources, additional funding will be needed to implement some of the Essential Actions. 8.5 A range of external funding programmes are available on a competitive bidding basis. These will be particularly important for the achievement of the more ambitious Aspirational Goals that have been identified. Successful bids have already been achieved from Sport England and the Marathon Trust. This Plan will provide an important tool for gaining further funding. Monitoring and Review 8.6 Monitoring procedures will be established for assessing both the impact of management action on the fabric of the Heath and public opinion. 8.7 This strategic management plan will be reviewed on a five yearly basis. 78 Information and Reporting 8.8 The establishment and maintenance of many features on the Heath requires a great deal of work in the form of surveys and studies. Many bodies, independent consultants, specialists and local societies contribute. This approach will be continued, unless circumstances change. 8.9 Accessibility to information is vital if the wealth of data collected is to inform management decisions. With this in mind, it is important to work towards centrally held sources of data for all areas of work. Some of the working groups have already produced very detailed papers and surveys. These will be essential in preparing the detailed topic papers that will form Part II of the management planning process. A Glimpse of the Future 8.10 It is useful to look ahead and consider how the Heath might look in a few years’ time as a result of the proposals presented here. Not all of the aspirations will be met, and a prioritising exercise must take place and funding secured. 8.11 Many aspects of the Heath will not have changed. People love the Heath as it is today and it will always be important to concentrate on conserving those elements of it that visitors most cherish. But management planning is not just about conserving what exists; it is also about making improvements. 8.12 A visit to the Heath might begin with an improved journey by public transport, with clear signage from stations and bus stops. At Heath entrance points there may be a warmer welcome for all, with clearer maps, and a more cohesive appearance to the environment. The Parliament Hill Fields area, as a major gateway, might provide a suitably attractive reception. 8.13 The Heath’s countryside will remain intact; valued Heath habitats will be protected and there may be new natural attractions, such as a sizeable reedbed. The heathland, which gave the area its name, may be a viable ecosystem instead of consisting of a few isolated patches of heather. Animals might be found grazing parts of the Heath, doing the work of lawn mowers. The West Heath sphagnum bog could be bigger and better than it is now, and confirmed as one of the most important in London. There will be identified replacements for the veteran trees that are reaching the end of their natural life. Neighbouring landowners could be playing their part in encouraging enhancement of wildlife to provide a valuable buffer for the Heath. 79 8.14 The Heath would sit comfortably in relation to the city that surrounds it, with views across the city, where appropriate, but also being protected from it, through planning control, where appropriate. 8.15 There may be more appropriate footpaths with surfaces reflecting the Heath’s natural aspect, and information on gradients and routes that will make the Heath more accessible to disabled and older people. It will be a more inclusive Heath. Meanwhile, there may be less vehicle movement and more sustainable management so that the environmental footprint is as small as possible. 8.16 There will be no increase in the footprint of the Heath’s built environment, but renovation and replacement is likely to lead to improvement to the existing stock. Major improvements are possible at the Lido and Athletics Track Pavilion, making these sports facilities adequate for a site as well-used as the Heath. It should be possible to enjoy refreshments at an improved and extended Lido café. The Heath’s sports facilities will be used more effectively and by a wider range of people. Improved water quality in the ponds will benefit both swimmers and the aquatic flora and fauna. 8.17 There might be marriage and civil partnership services at the refurbished Pergola, with its majestic colonnade and Belvedere viewing terrace, set amid restored formal gardens and a woodland backdrop. 8.18 At the heart of any new management plan for Hampstead Heath must be a conviction that it is the natural qualities of the Heath which are its richest asset. Any changes to the fabric or management regime of the Heath should be undertaken with this in mind. 80 APPENDIX 1 FIGURES 81 82 Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 1: Accessible Open Space Over 50ha in Relation to Hampstead Heath Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary London borough boundaries Accessible open space over 50ha 0 2 4 km Scale: 1: 295,000 DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\Additional_Figures\3696-01_Major_parks_open_spaces.mxd Figure 1 Source: City of London GLA Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 2: Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) in Relation to Hampstead Heath Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary 10km from Hampstead Heath SINCs Metropolitan importance Borough importance level 1 Borough importance level 2 Local importance 0 1 2 km Scale: 1:115,000 DATE: 01/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Additional_Figures\3696-01_SINC.mxd Figure 2 Source: City of London GLA Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 3: Hampstead Heath 1871 Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary 1871 Heathland 1871 East Park Estate Pond 1871 Woodland 1871 0 50 100 200 Metres Scale: 1: 15,000 DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig01_HH_in_1871.mxd Figure 3 Source: St. Pancras Parish Map 1801; 1804 Newton's Map 1814 Stanfords Library Map 1862 O.S. 25" 1st Edition Farmer, Ikin, Serive Ordnance Survey Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 4: Hampstead Heath 2006 Key Hampstead Heath site boundary Heathland \ Acid grassland Pond Woodland Scale: 1: 15,000 0 50 100 DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_fig02_HH_2006.mxd Figure 4 Source: City of London Hampstead Heath Ordnance Survey 200 Metres Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 5: Population density within 1.6 Kilometres (1 Mile) of Hampstead Heath Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary People per Sq Km 300 - 1000 1001 - 5050 5051 - 10000 10001 - 15000 15001 - 30000 30001 and Over 0 200 400 Metres Scale: 1: 35,000 DATE: 10/01/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\New_Order_10-01-07\3696-01_fig03_Population_Density.mxd Figure 5 Source: City of London Office of National Statistics Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 6: Indices of Multiple Deprivation within 1.6 km (1 Mile) of Hampstead Heath Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary Indices of Multiple Deprivation 7.30 - 11.87 (Least Deprived) 11.871 - 18.91 18.911 - 26.86 26.861 - 40.21 40.211 - 62.29 (Most Deprived) 0 200 400 Metres Scale: 1: 35,000 DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_fig04_IMD.mxd Figure 6 Source: City of London Office of National Statistics Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 7: Schools within 1.6 Kilometres (1 Mile) of Hampstead Heath Primary Schools 4 83 16 15 32 69 27 73 75 26 17 50 70 63 6 77 72 47 82 23 3 7 46 64 1 74 42 8 48 61 22 79 76 24 34 65 21 67 30 78 43 9 13 12 49 2 35 56 54 36 18 11 41 20 33 14 84 10 40 5 45 44 51 37 55 25 59 81 68 53 52 80 29 Scale: 1: 25,000 0 125 250 500 Source: City of London London Borough of Camden London Borough of Barnet London Borough of Haringey Date: 18/04/2008 Revision:C Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 File: S:\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_fig05_Schools_a3_revC.mxd Secondary Schools All Saints' CE School 65 Acland Burghley School Beckford Primary School 66 Camden School for Girls Brookfield Primary School 67 Hampstead School Brookland Primary School 68 Haverstock School Carlton Primary School 69 Henrietta Barnett School Channing Junior School 70 Highgate School Childs Hill School 71 Holloway School Christ Church CE Primary School 72 King Alfred School Devonshire House Preparatory School 73 Kisharon Day School Ecole Primaire L'ile Aux Enfants 74 La Sainte Union Convent Eleanor Palmer Primary School 75 Menorah Grammar School Emmanuel CE Primary School 76 Parliament Hill Shool Fitzjohn's Primary School 77 St. Aloysius R C College Fleet Primary School 78 University College School (S) Garden Suburb Infant School 79 William Ellis School Garden Suburb Junior School Special Schools Golders Hill 80 Chalcot Gospel Oak Primary School 81 Frank Barnes Hall School 82 Harborough School Hampstead Hill School 83 Oak Lodge School Hampstead Hill School Pre-Preparatory School 84 The Royal Free Hospital Hampstead Parochial CE Primary School Children's School Hargrave Park Primary School Heathside Preparatory School Hereward House School Highgate Junior School Highgate Primary School Holy Trinity (Trinity Walk) CE Primary School Holy Trinity and St. Silas CE Primary School Institute of St. Marcellina Kentish Town Church CE Primary The Kerem School Lyndhurst House Preparatory School New End Primary School New Learning Centre North Bridge House School Junior House North Bridge House School Stepping Stone Nursey Phoenix School Rhyl Primary School The Rosary RC Primary School Royal School Hampstead St. Agnes RC School St. Anthony's Roman Catholic School St. Christopher's School St. Dominic's Primary School St. John's Upper Holloway Primary School St. Joseph's Primary School St. Margaret's School St. Mary's School Hampstead St. Michael's CE Primary school St. Patrick's Primary School St. Paul's CE Primary School Sarum Hall School South Hampstead High School (Juniors) South Hampstead High School (Seniors) Southbank International School Hampstead Campus Torriano Infants School Torriano Junior School Trevor-Roberts School Tufnell Park Primary School University College School (Juniors) Village School Wessex Gardens School Yerbury Primary School 66 19 38 58 57 31 39 62 28 60 71 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 750 Metres Figure 8: Hampstead Heath Management Plan Wildwood Road Heath Extension Seven Sisters Ponds The Hill Garden and Pergola Sandy Heath West Meadow Kenwood Depot Kenwood House Spaniards Road Golders Hill Park South Meadow Leg of Mutton Pond Stock Pond Ladies' Swimming Pond Bird Sanctuary Pond Model Boating Pond West Heath Men's Swimming Pond Judges Walk Highgate No.1 Pond Vale of Health Whitestone Pond Viaduct Pond Mixed Swimming Pond Hampstead No.2 Pond Tumulus Hampstead No.1 Pond Parliament Hill Athletics Track Lido Parliament Hill Depot Source: City of London Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig06_HH_Management_Plan_Nov2006_.mxd DATE: 04/10/2007 Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 9: Hampstead Heath aerial photograph with veteran tree survey 2006 Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary English Heritage area Veteran Tree Survey apple ash beech birch chestnut hawthorn hazel hornbeam lime maple oak pine poplar unsure wild service tree Scale: 1: 10,000 0 50 100 Source: City of London Ordnance Survey DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig07_Aerial.mxd 200 Metres Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 10: Hampstead Heath Hedgerows in c.1866 Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary Hedgerow with trees Trees marking former line of hedgerow Field boundary - no trees Pond Scale: 1: 15,000 0 DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig08_Hedgerows_1866.mxd 200 Metres Figure 10 Source: O.S. 25" 1st Edition Ordnance Survey 50 100 Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 11: Hampstead Heath Hedgerows in 2006 Key Hampstead Heath site boundary Historic hedgeline with dense shrubs, with or without old trees Historic hedgeline with limited shrubs, with or without old trees Line of old trees along historic hedgeline without shrubs Recently planted hedge Pond Scale: 1: 15,000 0 50 100 Date: 04/04/2008 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 File: S:\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig09_Hedgerows_2006.mxd Figure 11 Source: City of London Hampstead Heath Ordnance Survey 200 Metres 'JHVSF.BOBHFNFOUGSBNFXPSLTIPXJOHXJEFS$P-TUSVDUVSFBOETUBUVUPSZDPNNJUUFTT $JUZPG-POEPO$PSQPSBUF4USVDUVSF )BNQTUFBE)FBUI .BOBHFNFOU$PNNJUUFF t t t t &YFDVUJWFDPNNJUUF 1PMJDZNBOBHFNFOU .FFUTYQFSZFBS $P-FMFDUFENFNCFST QMVTPUIFSSFQSFTFOUJWFT 0QFO4QBDFT%FQBSUNFOU4USVDUVSF )BNQTUFBE)FBUI.BOBHFNFOU4USVDUVSF -PSE.BZFS"MEFSNFO $PVSUPG$PNNPO$PVODJM )BNQTUFBE)FBUI $POTVMUBUJWF$PNNJUUFF t t t 5PXO$MFSL $IJFG&YFDVUJWF t %JSFDUPSPG0QFO 4QBDFT %FQBSUNFOUBM8PSLJOH(SPVQT t t YHSPVQTJOWPMWJOHTUBõGSPNBMMTJUFT "HSFFQPMJDZBOEXPSLBQQSPBDIGPSY TQFDJmDXPSLBSFBT "TIUFBE$PNNPO 0QFO4QBDFT$PNNJUUFF %JSFDUPSPG0öDF &QQJOH'PSFTU )BNQTUFBE )FBUI 4VQFSJOUFOEFOU "MTPJODMVEFT2VFFOT1BSL)JHIHBUF8PPE *ODMVEFT$JUZ(BSEFOT8FTU)BN1BSL "MTPJODMVEFT'BSUIJOH%PXOT/FX)JMM,FOMFZ$PNNPO3JEEMFTEPXO4QSJOH1BSL t t %FUFSNJOFTPWFSBMMEFQBSUNFOUBMQPMJDZ $POTJEFSTTUSBUFHJDBOEDPSQPSBUF JTTVFT 1BSLT(BSEFOT 8FTU8JDLIBN $PVMTEPO$PNNPOT Figure 12 #VSOIBN#FFDIFT "EWJTPSZSPMF .FFUTBUMFBTUYQFSZFBS .BLFTSFHVMBSWJTJUTUP )FBUI NFNCFSPSHBOJTBUJPO HSPVQT Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 13: Hampstead Heath Planning Policy Context London Borough of Haringey London Borough of Barnet Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary Scheduled Ancient Monument Areas of Special Advertisment Control Borough Boundary Green Chains Metropolitan Walks Green Corridor (Camden) Areas of Special Character Heritage Land Archaeological Area Archaeological Priority Area Conservation Area Registered Parks and Gardens Ancient Woodland SSSI View Points Please note: Open Space, Metropolitan Open Land and SNCI (Metropolitan) cover the entire Heath London Borough of Camden Scale: 1: 15,000 50 100 200 Metres Source: London Borough of Barnet London Borough of Camden City of London Ordnance Survey DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig11_Planning_Context.mxd Figure 13 0 Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 14: Hampstead Heath Historic Features Key Hampstead Heath Site Boundary English Heritage area 19 21 28 24 9 8 53 36 28 26 20 18 23 44 22 25 1 4 4 5 27 51 Current OS Base (2006) 1 Kenwood (Grade II* Registered Park & Garden) 29 The Pound/Pinfold (Grade II Listed) 2 Golders Hill Park 30 The Hill Garden (Grade II* Registered Park and Garden) 3 Pitt House Garden: - A: Wall (Grade II Listed) - B: Archway (Grade II Listed) 4 Saxon boundary 31 Hill Garden Bridge (Grade II*Listed) 5 Boundary of the Medieval Manor and later of the Borough of Hampstead (Parts are visible may date back to 10th century when the estate was granted to the Abbey of Westminster) 33 Hill Garden Cruciform Pergola (Grade II* Listed) 32 Hill Garden Central Temple Summer House (Grade II* Listed) 34 Hill Garden Southern Pergola and terrace (Grade II* Listed) 6 Tumulus 35 Hill Garden Southern Summer House (Grade II* Listed) 7 Site of Maryon Wilson’s Brickworks 36 Hill Garden Western Pergola (Grade II* Listed) 8 Walter Field Drinking Fountain (Grade II Listed) 37 Hill Garden Western Summer House (Grade II* Listed) 9 Kenwood Farm (Grade II Listed) 38A + 38B Sites of Mesolithic Settlement 10 Drinking trough (Grade II Listed) 39 Site of Hatchetts Bottom Garden 11 The Lido (Grade II Listed) 40 Flagstaff 12 Victorian Sewer Vent Pipe (Grade II Listed) 41 North End 2 58 41 3A 55E 42 3 32 50 4 38A 30 37 36 38B 3B 31 33 55D 34 35 54 52 39 43 40 55A 55B 47 13 15 14 55C 16 49 6 14 Ha-Ha wall (Grade II Listed) 43 The Vale of Heath 15 Public conveniences (Grade II Listed) 44 Old line of Hampstead Lane 16 Viaduct Bridge (Grade II Listed) 45 Highgate Ponds 17 Bird Bridge 46 Hampstead Ponds 21 Kerb telephone kiosk (Grade II Listed) 48 29 42 The Elms 18 Kitchen, garden walls to Kenwood Nursery 47 Whitestone Pond (Grade II Listed) 48 Viaduct Pond 19 East Lodge to Kenwood House and attached gateways (Grade II Listed) 49 Vale of Heath Pond 20 Kenwood West Lodge with Flanking gates and gate piers (Grade II Listed) 50 Leg O’ Mutton Pond 45 17 13 Keepers Box (Grade II Listed) 7 4 51 Goodison Fountain 22 Monolith (Empyrean) Sculpture (Grade II Listed) 52 The Battery 23 Park Flats (Grade II Listed) 53 The site of Tooley’s Farm 24 Kenwood House (Grade I Listed) 54 Upper Fairground Site 25 Former dairy buildings to Kenwood House 55A, B, C, D and E – sites of quarries, (Grade II Listed) sand and gravel pits 26 Service wing and outbuildings (Grade II*Listed) 56 57 5 56 Stone of Free Speech 57 Milestone 27 Sham Bridge (Grade II* Listed) 46 58 Golders Hill House Foundations 28 The Lodge House and adjoining wall (Grade II Listed) 10 Scale: 1: 10,000 0 11 12 Source: City of London Survey of Hampstead Heath 1866 Ordnance Survey DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, LUC Licence No 100019265 S:\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\3696-01_Map14_Historic_Features.mxd 100 200 300 400 Metres Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 15: Hampstead Heath by the end of the 17th Century Key Hornsey Park Hampstead Heath site boundary 4 5 Kenwood House Formerly Wyldes Wood 1 1 The estate owned by the Priory of Holy Trinity, Aldgate from 1226 until 1532 2 The common of the Manor of Hampstead in 1680 3 Part of Hodford Wood, cleared in the 16/17th Century 4 Hornsey Park, the Bishop of London's deer park 5 Wydes Wood, cleared 1553-53 owned by Eton College from the 15th Century 6 Demesne land of the Manor of Hampsted Heathland Formerly Hodford Wood Woodland Canewood and Gyll Holt Wood Boundary between medieval manors of Hempstead and Tottenhall. Later became the parish and borough boundary 3 6 2 1 Division made in 1525 Formerly Whiteburche Wood Canewood or Millefeldes 1 2 Notes This estate was divided in two in 1525: (i) At this time the northern part consisted of 2 woods, Canewood and Gyll Holt. After c.1600 these were extensively cleared. The first Kenwood House was Built in 1616 by John Bill (ii) The Sothern part was a farm called Canewood Fields or Millefeldes. An undated map of the northern part c.1600 names the areas of land around the boundaries (iii) Whiteburche and Brockehole woods were probably cleared by c.1600 and fields enclosed (iv) It is not known when the ponds were made. By the end of the 17thC. The Hampstead Water Co. had made some of the Hampstead ponds and the first three of the Highgate Ponds Source: City of London Survey of Hampstead Heath 1680 L.C.C Survey of London Ikin Ordnance Survey DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig13_HH_in_17th_Century.mxd 0 50 100 200 Metres Figure 15 Scale: 1: 15,000 Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 16: Hampstead Heath in the early 19th Century Key Hampstead Heath site boundary 6 Designed Landscapes Bagshot sand and gravel extracted Heathland / Acid grassland Pond Woodland / Tree clumps and belts 2 5 4 1 Kenwood Estate (Earl of Mansfield) 2 Lord Southampton's Estate 3 Maryon Wilson Fields (East Park Estate) 4 Evergreen Hill, Lord Erskine's Estate 5 Golders Hill Park. Possibly laid out by Capability Brown 6 Farmland owned by Eton College. Later to become Heath extention (1907) 1 3 Scale: 1: 15,000 0 50 100 200 Metres DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig14_HH_in_19th_Century.mxd Figure 16 Source: St. Pancras Map 1801; 1804 Newtons Map 1814 Survey of the Borough of St. Marylebone 1834 Geological Survey Garard's Herball Barratts Annals Farmer Ikin Ordnance Survey Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 17: Hampstead Heath 2006 Key Hampstead Heath site boundary Heathland \ Acid grassland Pond Woodland Scale: 1: 15,000 0 50 100 DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig15_HH_2006.mxd Figure 17 Source: City of London Hampstead Heath Ordnance Survey 200 Metres Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 18: Hampstead Heath Broad Habitat Types Key Hampstead Heath site boundary Scattered scrub Scattered trees Defunct hedge Hedge with trees Hedge without trees Heather planting Buildings Amenity or improved grassland Bare ground Coniferous woodland Continuous scrub Marsh / marshy grassland Open water Semi-natural broad-leaved woodland Species-poor semi-improved grassland Species-poor unimproved grassland (acid and neutral types) Species-rich semi improved grassland Tall ruderal Acidic flush Note: These habitats have been mapped from aerial photographs, previous surveys and ground truthing. Scale: 1: 15,000 0 50 100 DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig16_Broad_habitat_types.mxd Figure 18 Source: City of London Hampstead Heath Ordnance Survey 200 Metres Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 19: Hampstead Heath Built Environment xvii Key Buildings Artefacts and boundary features Other features 34 Hampstead Heath Site Boundary English Heritage area 1 xvi i 29 31 K 30 32 26 33 28 27 D 3 xiii 25 4 xiv xii M 35 2 xv 24 L xi 23 vi vii v 5 6 20 C x 7 N viii E 21 ix 12 ii 11 iv 8 Buildings Artefacts and Boundary Features 1 Kenwood Nursery Yard buildings Highgate Ponds Valley 2 Chubb Shelter 3 Ladies Bathing Pond buildings 4 Millfield Lane Toilets 5 Men’s Bathing Pond buildings 6 Pond Keepers Hut Parliament Hill Fields 7 Meadow Cottage 8 Bowling Pavilions 9 Park Lodge 10 Staff Yard 11 Café 12 Bandstand 13 Main Toilets 14 Lido 15 One O’clock Club 16 Adventure playground building 17 Running Track Pavilion 18 Playground toilets (within paddling pool enclosure) 19 Football Changing Rooms East Heath 20 Field No 11 Shelter 21 Mixed Bathing Pond buildings 22 East Heath Works Depot 23 Vale of Health Toilets 24 Vale of Health Works Depot Golders Hill Park 25 Deer enclosure shelters 26 Bandstand 27 Toilets 28 Zoo buildings 29 Park shelters 30 Tennis kiosk 31 Nursery Buildings and Staff Yard 32 Café 33 Golders Hill Cottages Heath Extension 34 Sports Changing Rooms, Works Depot, Toilets The Hill Garden 35 Keepers Bothy i. Goodison Fountain ii. Stone of Free Speech iii. Sewer Vent iv. Drinking trough v. Viaduct Bridge vi. Bird Bridge vii. Keepers Hut and Boundary Wall viii. Pound (Pinfold) ix. Whitestone Garden brick pier x. Flagpole xi. Pergola xii. Hill Garden Steps and Shelter xiii. Hill Garden Boundary Walls xiv. Pitt House Garden Archway xv. Pitt House Garden Wall xvi. Walter Field Memorial Fountain xvii. Great Wall Other Features A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. Car Parks, Roads and Path Network East Heath Car Park Lido Car Park Jack Straws Car Park Play Facilities Golders Hill Park Play Area Vale of Health Play Area East Heath Play Area Parliament Hill Adventure Playground and 1 O'Clock Club Playground Play Area and Paddling Pool Sports Facilities Parliament Hill Running Track Parliament Hill Tennis Courts Golders Hill Park Tennis Courts Ponds Boating Pond Hill Garden Pond Whitestone Pond J 13 J 10 9 Scale: 1: 10,000 0 50 100 200 Metres A F 22 19 18 H 17 I G 15 16 Source: London Borough of Barnet London Borough of Camden City of London Ordnance Survey 14 B iii DATE: 04/10/2007 Revision: Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig17_Building_Environment_A3.mxd Hampstead Heath Management Plan Figure 21: Sports Facilities and Areas R4 Key R5 Hampstead Heath Site Boundary F3 C C C C C1 C1 English Heritage area F2 Ponds F1 Athletics Track C1 Bowling Green Cricket Pitch Fishing C13 Football Pitch Petanque Pitch Rugby Pitch Tennis Courts Changing Rooms Ladies Bathing Mens Bathing Mixed Bathing Hockey Golf Practice + Putting Rounders / Softball Lido SportsArea Sports Area A Sports Area B Sports Area C Sports Pitches F C R IS C15 F19 I.S 19 = = = = Football Cricket Rugby Informal Sports Scale: 1: 10,000 0 50 100 F18 F17 Source: City of London Hampstead Heath Ordnance Survey DATE: 04/10/2007 Reproduced from Ordnance Survey information with the permission of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Crown Copyright, Land Use Consultants, Licence Number 100019265 FILE: \\LUC-LON-NAS1\DATA\3600\3696 Hampstead Heath\GIS\Themes\ArcGIS9\Figures\Overview_Document\Alterations_01-10-07\3696-01_Fig19_Sports_areas.mxd 200 Metres APPENDIX 2 BIBLIOGRAPHY Working group written representations Each of the six working groups – History, Natural Landscape, Built Environment, Sport, Access and Education and Policy – produced a written statement summarising the thoughts and findings of their group in September 2006. Two of the groups produced additional written work: x Built Environmental Working Group Hampstead Heath Buildings and Structures Inventory and Descriptions, plus two photograph albums (April 2006) Significance (July 2006) Significance and all that, A3 document (July 2006) Statement on views from the Heath (July 2006) Photographic album of Access Points, in three volumes (undated) x Sports Working Group Sport on Hampstead Heath (September 2006) Land Use Consultants documents A series of Baseline Condition and Management Issues documents was prepared for the City of London by Land Use Consultants (October 2006): Access and Education Built Environment History Natural Landscape Policy Public Use Sports Other references Barnet Local Strategic Partnership, A Sustainable Community Strategy for Barnet (2006– 2016) (2006) 83 CABE Space, The Value of Public Space – how high quality parks and public spaces create economic, social and environmental value (2004) Camden Biodiversity Action Plan Partnership, The Wild Side of Camden – the Camden Biodiversity Action Plan (undated) City of London, Biodiversity Action Plan (2003) City of London, City of London Sustainability Policy (2005) City of London, The City Together: A Vision for a World Class City – The City of London Community Strategy 2004–2014 (2004) City of London, Hampstead Heath Condition Survey (Buildings) (2005) City of London, Interim Hampstead Heath Management Plan 2006–08 (2006) City of London, Open Spaces Department Business Plan 2006 – 2009 (2006) Corporation of London, Corporation of London Recycling Plan 2003–08 (undated) Department of Culture, Media and Sport/Strategy Unit, Game Plan: a strategy for delivering Government’s sport and physical activity objectives (2002) Department of the Environment, Regional Planning Guidance: Supplementary Guidance for London on the Protection of Strategic Views (RPG 3, Annex A, November 1991) (1991) Department of Health, Choosing activity: a physical activity action plan (White Paper) (2005) English Heritage, Caring for Kenwood Part I – Today and Part II – The Future (Kenwood management plan) (1996) English Heritage, Easy access to historic landscapes (2005) Fieldfare Trust, Countryside for All Good Practice Guide (2005) GfK Consumer Services, City of London Open Spaces Department Hampstead Heath Visitor Survey (2006) Greater London Authority, Offside – the loss of London’s playing fields (2006) Greater London Authority, Woodland, scrub and hedgerow management at Parliament Hill Management Area, Hampstead Heath (2001) 84 Haycock Associates, Hydrological and Water Quality Investigation and Modelling of the Hampstead Heath Lake Chains and Associated Catchments, Version 7 (August 2006) Heath and Hampstead Society, Heath Vision – Hampstead Heath in the 21st century (2004) Heritage Lottery Fund, Audience Development Plans – helping your application (undated) JMP Consultants Ltd, Assessment of Cycle Routes on Hampstead Heath (2002) London Biodiversity Partnership, London Biodiversity Action Plan (2004) London Borough of Camden, Consultation draft of Camden Together, Community Strategy (2007–2012) (2006) London Borough of Camden, Policies for the fringes of the Heath (1981) London Ecology Unit, Grassland management at Parliament Hill Management Area, Hampstead Heath (2000) Mayor of London, Connecting with London’s nature, the Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy (2002) Mayor of London, The London Plan, Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London (2004) Mayor of London, Interim Strategic Planning Guidance on Tall Buildings, Strategic Views and the Skyline in London (2001) Mayor of London, The Mayor’s Transport Strategy (2001, revised 2004) Sport England, The London Plan for sport and physical activity 2004–08 (2004) United Kingdom Government, Biodiversity – the UK Action Plan (1994) 85 APPENDIX 3 GLOSSARY Acid grassland is a habitat found on nutrient-poor acid soils and is often associated with heathland. It is intrinsically less species-rich than neutral or chalk grassland of a similar quality. Biodiversity (or biological diversity) is the variety of life including all living organisms and the genetic differences between them. Bogs are habitats formed in areas of impeded drainage. Waterlogging results and leads to anaerobic conditions, which slows down the decomposition of plant material, which in turn leads to an accumulation of peat. Bogs are characterised by wetland species and, in particular, sphagnum mosses. Community cohesion is the development of a community that is in a state of wellbeing, harmony and stability, where people from different backgrounds have similar opportunities. Coppicing is a traditional method of woodland management whereby tree stems are cut down to a low level and subsequently many new shoots grow up. The re-growth can be harvested after a number of years. The process can enhance the wildlife interest of a woodland or hedge and prolongs the life of the individual trees. Ecology is the interaction of living things with other living things and their environment. An Ecosystem is a group of living things plus the non-living things they need (such as climate, water, soil). There is interaction between the different parts of the ecosystem. Eutrophication is the over-enrichment of a waterbody with nutrients, which results in excessive growth of certain organisms (such as algae) and a depletion of dissolved oxygen. The result is an environment that does not readily support aquatic life. Flora and fauna constitute all the plant and animal life of a particular area or region. Geology is the study of the minerals, rocks and physical formations which make up the earth. Heathland is an open habitat on poor, sandy soils characterised by heather, as well as other dwarf shrubs and low-growing species such as gorse and cross-leaved heath. It can also include scattered trees, bracken, scrub and bare ground. It is often associated with acid grassland. 86 Hydrology is the study of the properties, distribution and circulation of water. Laying hedgerows involves partially cutting through the living stems of shrubs in a hedge near the ground, bending them over and binding them together to make a living barrier. It is an effective way of enhancing a hedge’s value for nature conservation and prolonging its life. Lifelong learning is the concept that learning occurs beyond the formal education structure and occurs at all levels – formal and informal – and with flexibility, throughout one’s lifetime. The Mesolithic period lasted in Britain from around 10,000 BC to 4,500 BC. It marked the end of the last Ice Age and the middle part of the Stone Age. It saw the emergence of sophisticated groups of hunter-gatherers who used spears and harpoons. Microbiology relates to micro-organisms and their life processes. Outreach is community orientated activity that is designed to engage new people from targeted populations who are not effectively reached by existing means. Pollarding is the lopping of branches from a tree at or above head height, to encourage re-growth above the reach of browsing animals. It may be used as an alternative to coppicing (see above). Scrub is low-growing vegetation where the main woody component is bushes, such as hawthorn and blackthorn, or undershrubs such as bramble. Social inclusion (or inclusivity) is the process by which efforts are made to ensure that all sectors of society, regardless of background, experiences and circumstances can gain access to services and facilities and be involved in planning and decision making. Swimming Ponds are those on Hampstead Heath designated for swimming and bathing. Topography is the ‘lay of the land’; it describes the shapes, patterns and physical configuration of the surface of the land, including the relief and the positions of natural and man-made features. Veteran trees are those that meet all of the following criteria: x Trees of biological, aesthetic or cultural interest because of their age x Trees in the ancient stage of their life x Trees that are old relative to the others of the same species. 87
© Copyright 2024