Canadian Journal of Bioinformatics & Biosciences 1(15):5-10, 2015 Submitted: February 3, 2015 Accepted: March 27, 2015 Published: April 5, 2015 Research Article: MOLECULAR MODELING OF LIPOID PROTEINOSIS (ECM1) PROTEIN AND ITS DOMAINS Iram Ghafoor, Javed Iqbal, Zubair Anwar, Uzma Soukat, Mohammad Ismail and Jabar Zaman Khan Khattak* 1. 2. International Islamic University, Islamabad IBGE, Islamabad Pakistan Abstract: Lipoid proteinosis (LP) is rare autosomal recessive skin disorder, with varying severity of clinical manifestations. Common clinical appearances of LP are weak cry and early infancy with hoarseness, widespread scarring and infiltrated plaques on mucosal surfaces and skin, especially at the sites of minor trauma and on sunexposed areas. Lipoid proteinosis is the consequences from pathogenetic loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding extracellular matrix protein1 (ECM1), mapped to a locus on chromosome 1q21. Forty six ECM1 gene mutations have been described to date in discrete patients affected with lipoid proteinosis. The mutations in LP include predominantly 19 insertions/deletions, 8 missense, 15 nonsense, and 4 splice site mutations and mostly are present on exon 6 and 7. The present study was undertaken with a view to model ECM1 of full-length and its domains. Therefore, increased quality model of the ECM1 protein through threading modeling approach and its domains through comparative modeling has been generated. The structural prediction of the ECM1 would likely help in attempts to accurately predict the effect of mutations on the overall structure of the protein. Key words: Lipoid proteinosis, extracellular matrix protein1, dimethyl sulfoxide INTRODUCTION Lipoid proteinosis (LP) is also known as Urbach– Wiethe disease or hyalinosis cutis et mucosae. Its consequences are from mutations in the extracellular matrix protein1 (ECM1) present on the chromosome band 1q21. It is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder worldwide, was detailed review for the first time by a Viennesedermatologist and otorhinolaryngologist, Urbach and Wiethe, in 1929 (OMIM 247100) (Urbach et al., 1929). The mutations in ECM1 are due to the loss-of-function (Hamda et al., 2002). Human ECM1 encodes glycoprotein known as secretary protein (85 kDa); function of this protein is unknown. It was the protein recognized in a murine osteogenic stromal cell line MN7 first time, by using techniques twodimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Western blotting and micro sequencing and protein was drived from bone marrow stroma of the adult mouse (Mathieu et al., 1994; Bhalerao et al., 1995; Smits et al., 1997; Johnson et al., 1997). Main symptoms of lipoid proteinosis are the hoarseness of the voice, widespread warty hyperkeratosis and marking of the skin (Gordon et al., 1971). During infancy, disorder hoarseness of voice is usually observed; it is most dazzling clinical features in LP (Nanda et al., 2001) such as vocal cord that contained the hyaline-like material deposited in the mucous membranes of the or faint or weak cry. In some cases, symptoms were developed at early age after first or few years of life and soon after birth. The typical and most common symptom is the “beaded” papules on the eyelid (Balck et al., 1998; Bozdag et al., 200; Dinakaran et al., 2001) at the site of cilia skin openings (Scott and Findlay, 1960; Ozbek et al., 1994; Bozdag et al., 2000). Other cutaneous changes include diffuse skin infiltration and a thickness of general skin having waxy and yellow manifestation, and in one region warty hyperkeratosis was emphasized. Mechanical friction is the region where Hyperkeratosis is also, such as the elbows, axillae, buttocks, hands, knees and, also often occurrence of flexural lichenification (Pariak et al., 2005). During childhood, friction or minor trauma damaged the skin, which cause blisters and scar formation (Hu et al., 2005). The mucosae of the tonsils, soft palate, pharynx, tongue, and lips are also accessed and also cause the respiratory difficulty, especially in affilication with an upper respiratory tract infection, which sometimes require tracheostomy (Ramsey et al., 1985). The most important LP changes are present in the dermis and subcutis of the skin, at the dermal– epidermal intersection basement membrane was thickened, also present at approximately adnexal epithelia and around blood vessels and in the dermis the evidence of deposition of hyaline material (Muda Corresponding Author: Jabar Zaman Khan Khattak [email protected] Canadian Journal of Bioinformatics & Biosciences 1(15):5-10, 2015 et al., 1995). The gene ECM1 has four known splice variants ECM1a, ECM1b, ECM1c and ECM1d have been reported, but fourth splice variant of ECM1 has been reported recently. The most broadly expressed splice variant is ECM1a(1.8 kb), and originate in a variety of tissues including skin, lung, prostate, ovary, skeletal muscle, pancreas, kidney and liver, testis, small intestines, but expressed predominantly in heart tissues and placenta tissues. On the other hand, limited expression pattern is present in ECM1b (1.4 kb) expressed only in skin, keratinocytes and tonsils. The ECM1c expression pattern is not resolute yet, expressed in two cancer cell lines, but it reports that in skin for 15% approximately of total ECM1 mRNA expression. The fourth splice variant’s expression pattern is not identified yet. process comprises fold assignment, alignment between target and template, building model and model evaluation. The 3D structure of ECM1 was predicted through the I-TASSER (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/). The structure of the domains of ECM1 was predicted through the MODELLER 9v11 (). Evaluation of structures The evaluation of models is a compulsory phase in almost all projects. The modeling of various ECM1 is basic step of project, so the evaluation is important for verifying the energy values of predicted models. Also determined the stereochemical properties and all the possible errors present in the generated structures are explored. Each structure contains the favored and nonfavored regions that are determined through evaluation. 3D structure was evaluated through PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 2001) and Rampage (http://mordred.bioc.cam.ac.uk/~rapper /rampage.php). There are 300 mutations of LP have been described into the literature so forth (Hofer, 1973). The disease LP appears throughout the world but more frequent in geographical areas where the common effects of consanguinity, an initiator cause from Northern Cape Province of South Africa (Heyl, 1971; Gordon et al., 1971; Stine and Smith, 1990; Hamda et al., 2002).No effective treatment of Lipoid proteinosis is available so forth. The therapy dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) gives the expressive response to LP disease (Wrong and Lin, 1988). Another useful therapy is Dpenicillamine, but its experience is limited (Kaya et al., 2002). On this ground, I have generated a reliable model of full-leng ECM1 protein by threading approach and the model of domains of ECM1 protein by homology modelling. For the prediction of ECM1 model the I-TASSER and MODELLER software were used. RESULTS & DISCUSSION The three Dimensional structure is important for providing valuable insight into molecular functions of the protein. Other computational methods for structure prediction X-ray and NMR are time consuming and expensive. 3D structure of target protein ECM1 based on the known protein structures. The 3D structure of ECM1 was predicted by I-TASSER in Fig. 1 and Phyre2. On the high confidence and converge basis the best model was selected. I-TASSER covered all the 540 residues for structure prediction. The selection of model is on the basis of high C-score and higher Cluster density. Phyre2 covered only 265 residues (195-471) for 3D structure prediction. 49% of sequence has been modeled with 99.2% confidence by meaningfully predicted. The 3D structures of four domains of ECM1 were also predicted Fig.2. The 3D structure of N-terminal cysteine-free domain of ECM1 protein was predicted by I-TASSER and other 3 domains ECM1 repeat 1, ECM1 repeat 2 and C-terminal region were predicted by modeler (9.11) the single highest scoring template. 54% of sequence is predicted disordered. Disordered regions cannot be software. The template of these domains was obtained from the BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) shown in Table 1. The maximum identity of template with query sequence is best for good quality of 3D model. More than 30% identity is required for the homology modeling. MATERIALS & METHODS Target Sequence The amino acid sequence of Extracellular Matrix Protein 1 (ECM1) was obtained from NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (Q16610). There are 540 amino acid residues present in the sequence. The 3D structure of ECM1 is not present in the database. So it is predicted through the threading approach. The 3D structure of the domains of ECM1 is also predicted. 3D Structure Prediction Modeling approach predicts the 3-D structure of a target protein sequence based on its alignment with a known protein structure called as template. The 6 Canadian Journal of Bioinformatics & Biosciences 1(15):5-10, 2015 Fig. 2 – Cartoon structure of domains of ECM1 protein a) N-terminal cysteine-free domain, b) ECM1 repeat 1, c) ECM1 repeat 2, d) C-terminal region. Fig. 2- Cartoon structure of ECM1 protein, coloured by domain (red = Signal peptide, blue = N-terminal cysteine-free domain, yellow = ECM1 repeat 1, magenta = ECM1 repeat 2, green = C-terminal region). Table 1- Max. Identity between ECM1 sequence and template. Models Model 1 Model 2 Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 Template 1n5uA c1e7bA_ 1mv3A 1AF2_A 1YVU_A 3V08_A Tool used I-TASSER Phyre 2 I-TASSER Modeller Modeller Modeller Max. Identity 37% 41% 41% No of residues 540 residues 265 residues 158 residues 212 residues 148 residues 108 residues plot was divided into most favoured regions, additional allowed, generously allowed and disallowed regions. This plote shows that the predicted structures were satisfactory because mostly residues are laid in the most 3.2.1.3 Evaluation of Structure The 3D structures of domains of ECM1 were also evaluated. After 3D structure prediction and refinement, the model was evaluated using PROCHECK and RAMPAGE. The evaluation of structures was shown in Table 2. The ramachandran 7 Canadian Journal of Bioinformatics & Biosciences 1(15):5-10, 2015 Fig. 3- Ramachandran plot produced by PROCHECK after modeling of ECM1 protein. [A, B, L] most favored regions (84.3%); [a, b, l, p] additional allowed regions (11.9%); [~a, ~b, ~l, ~p] generously allowed regions (1.6%); white areas are disallowed regions (2.2%). favoured region. This drives Psi and Phi plots, as denser number of residues are present in the favored region so it was good quality model. The Ramachandran Plot statistics determined that Glycine residues and Proline residues were also present in the ramachandran plot of the model. Table 2- Ramachandran plot values of ECM1 protein and its domain by using PROCHEK. Model Model 1 Model 2 Domain 1 Domain 2 Domain 3 Domain 4 Favoured Regions 84.3% 90.5% 54.9% 89.4% 72.2% 68.9% Allowed Region 11.9% 7.0% 38.9% 8.9% 24.6% 24.4% 8 Generously Allowed Regions 1.6% 0.8% 3.5% 1.7% 3.2% 6.7% Disallowed Regions 2.2% 1.6% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Canadian Journal of Bioinformatics & Biosciences 1(15):5-10, 2015 CONCLUSION Lipoid proteinosis is the deposition of an amorphous hyaline material in the skin, mucosa, and viscera. The 3D structure prediction has significant potential as a tool in rational drug design, in high throughput in silico screening. This work is a significant step for bioinformatics analysis of ECM1 protein and supports for further analysis. The important protein functional features are investigated by structure and better understanding of its characteristics. The greater insight of structure is possible by the detail study of ECM1. 3D structure provides further computational methods and understands the binding modes and its antagonists. The inhibition of ECM1 is understood that is present in Lipoid proteinosis disease. The development and computational drug designing is depends upon the structure. The 3D structure of ECM1 is submitted to the PMDB (Protein Model DataBase) and the following ID is assigned PM0078323. REFERENCES Bhalerao J., Tylzanowski P., Filie J.D., Kozak C.A., And Merregaert J., (1995) Molecular cloning, characterization and genetic mapping of the cDNA coding for a novel secretory protein of mouse, Demonstration of alternative splicing in skin and cartilage, J. Biol. Chem., 270, p.16385–16394. Black M.M., (1998) Lipoid Proteinosis; Metabolic and nutritional disorders. In: Champion R.H., Burton J.L., Burns D.A., Breathnach S.M., eds. Rook/Wilkinson/Ebling Textbook of Dermatology, 6th edition, Oxford: Blackwell Science, p.2460–2. Bozdag K.E., Gul Y., And Araman A. (2000) Lipoid proteinosis. Int J Dermatol, 39, p.203–4. Dinakaran S., Desai S.P., Palmer I.R., And Parsons M.A., (2001) Lipoid proteinosis: clinical features and electron microscopic study, Eye, 15, p.666-668 Gordon H., Gordon W., Botha V., And Edelstein I., (1971) Lipoid proteinosis, Birth Defects Orig Artic Series, 7, p.164–77. Hamada T., McLean W.H.I., Ramsay M., Ashton G.H.S., Nanda A., Jenkins T., Edelstein I., South A.P., Oliver B., Wessagowit V., Mallipeddi R., Orchard G.E., Wan H., Dopping-Hepenstal P.J.C., Mellerio J.E., Whittock N.V., Munro C.S., Steensel M.A.M., Steijlen P.M., Ni J., Zhang L., Hashimoto T., Eady R.A.J., And McGrath J.A., (2002) Lipoid proteinosis maps to 1q21 and is caused by mutations in the extracellular matrix protein 1 gene (ECM1), Human Molecular Genetics, 11, p.833-840. Heyl T., (1971) Lipoid proteinosis in South Africa, Dermatologica, 142, p.129–32. Hofer P.A., (1973) Urbach–Wiethe disease (lipoglycoproteinosis; lipoid proteinosis; hyalinosis cutis et mucosae). A review, Acta Derm. Vernereol. Suppl. (stockh), 53, p.1-52. Hu S., Kuo T.T., And Hong H.S., (2005) Lipoid proteinosis: report of a possible localised form on both hands and wrists, Int J Dermatol, 44, p.408–410. Johnson M.R., Wilkin D.J., Vost H.L., Luna R.I.O., Dehejia A.M., Pplymeropoulos M.H., and Francomano C.A., (1997) Characterization of the human extracellular matrix protein 1 gene on chromosome 1q21, Matrix Biol., 16, p.289–92. Kaya T.I., Kokturk A., Tursen U., Ikizoglu G., And Polat A., (2002) D-penicillamine treatment for lipoid proteinosis, Pediatr Dermatol, 19, p.359–362. Mathieu E., Meheus L., Raymackers J., and Merregaert J., (1994), Characterization of the stromal osteogenic cell line MN7: identification of secreted MN7 proteins using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, western blotting and microsequencing, J. Bone Miner, Res., 9, p.903–913 Muda A.O., Paradisi M., Angelo C., Mostaccioli S., Atzori F., Puddu P., And Faraggiana T., (1995) Lipoid proteinosis: clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural investigations, Cutis, 56, p.220–224. Ozbek S.S., Akyar S., And Turgay M., (1994) Case report: computed tomography findings in lipoid proteinosis: report of two cases, Br J Radiol, 67, p.207–9. Pariak A.H., Koybasi S., Boran C., And Ibrahimbas Y., (2005). Lipoid proteinosis: an unusual presentation with verruca vulgaris, J Dermatol, 32, p.751–755. Scott F., And Findlay G., (1960) Hyalinosis cutis et mucosae (lipoid proteinosis), S Afr Med J, 34, p.189– 95. Sellami D., Masmoudi A., Turki H., Mseddi M., Kammoun B., Elleuch N., Chaabouni F., Ben Zina Z., Feki J., And Zahaf A., (2006) Ophthalmic manifestations of lipoid proteinosis, Presse Med, 35, p.796–798. Stine O.C., And Smith K.D., (1990) The estimation of selection coefficient in Afrikaaners: Huntington disease, porphyria variegate and lipoid proteinosis, Am J Hum Genet, 46, p.452-458. Urbach E., And Wiethe C., (1929) Lipoidosis cutis et mucosae, Virchows Arch Path Anat, 273, p.285–319. Smits P., Ni J., Feng P., Wauters J., van Hul W., Boutaibi M.E., Dillon P.J., And Merregaert J., (1997) The human extracellular matrix gene 1 (ECM1): genomic structure, cDNA cloning, expression pattern and chromosomal localization, Genomics, 45, p.487– 495. 9 Canadian Journal of Bioinformatics & Biosciences 1(15):5-10, 2015 Wong C.K., And Lin C.S., (1988) Remarkable response of lipoid proteinosis to oral dimethylsulfoxide, Br J Dermatol, 119, p.541-544. 10
© Copyright 2024