Building a Culture of Accountability, Alignment and Transparency April 22, 2015| Bill Santulli, Executive Vice President/Chief Operating Officer Building a Culture of Accountability, Alignment and Transparency Outline • Advocate Health Care • Accountability Defined • Principles • Alignment and Organizational Rhythm • Operating Practices • Q&A 2 Accountability Definition* The obligation of an individual or organization to account for its activities, accept responsibility for them, and to disclose the results in a transparent manner. 4 * BusinessDirectory.com “WINNING” 5 Report Card – March 2015 2020 Strategy Key Result Area Measure Target Actual -5.0% -5.8% Safety Event Reporting Rate 3.5 4.0 Health Outcomes Score 100 57 Patient Engagement 75 57 Associate Engagement 80 >90 Physician Engagement 75 77 Net Revenue Growth (% vs Prior Year) 6.18% 6.83% Operating Margin 1.81% 5.09% Hospital Cost per Discharge $8,077 $8,004 Medical Group Cost per Visit $116.80 $118.23 Philanthropy (millions) $2.19 $2.30 AdvocateCare® Index 100 66 Serious Safety Event Rate Change SAFETY ADVOCATE EXPERIENCE QUALITY SERVICE GROWTH ACCESS AND AFFORDABILITY ADVOCATECARE® 6 FUNDING OUR FUTURE COORDINATED CARE Achieved Culture of High of Accountability Principles Focused on who we serve: Our Patients Inspired by our Mission, Values and Philosophy Guided by Vision Living Our Values through Observable Actions - Behaviors of Excellence Intent on Collaboration with All Stakeholders to Provide a Safe, Superior Experience Transparency of results Committed to systematic operating practices 7 ® 8 Report Card – March 2015 2020 Strategy Key Result Area Measure Target Actual -5.0% -5.8% Safety Event Reporting Rate 3.5 4.0 Health Outcomes Score 100 57 Patient Engagement 75 57 Associate Engagement 80 >90 Physician Engagement 75 77 Net Revenue Growth (% vs Prior Year) 6.18% 6.83% Operating Margin 1.81% 5.09% Hospital Cost per Discharge $8,077 $8,004 Medical Group Cost per Visit $116.80 $118.23 Philanthropy (millions) $2.19 $2.30 AdvocateCare® Index 100 66 Serious Safety Event Rate Change SAFETY ADVOCATE EXPERIENCE QUALITY SERVICE GROWTH ACCESS AND AFFORDABILITY ADVOCATECARE® 9 FUNDING OUR FUTURE COORDINATED CARE Achieved Behaviors of Excellence Signed by each new hire Evaluated in every performance review Foundation for differentiating performance Values demonstrated by associates, physicians, and volunteers are recognized through MVP quarterly and annual awards 10 Transparency • Posted in every department • Available online • Distributed to all managers • Safety alerts/Root cause analyses 11 29 Days Since Last Serious Safety Event 12 Alignment Goals Set Annually for Key Result Areas: Goals are outcome-oriented (vs process), weighted, and associated with a target and a stretch level of performance. Watchlist goals defined. Targets/stretch levels aim for top quartile or top decile performance Timelines: o AHC System goals, targets/stretch identified (Sept- Oct) o Site goals (aligned with system goals) determined (Oct-Dec) o Site goals cascaded throughout the management team (to supervisor level) to achieve alignment between organizational and department goals (Dec – Jan) o Goals loaded into electronic system – Advocate Management System (AMS) (Feb) 13 Organizational Rhythm HR: Mgt Reviews Due Site Forums Capital: Finalize short list of projects for feasibility Key Leadership Health Outcomes Kickoff January MOR Talent Review and Plan Preliminary Site Growth Plans Due EMT Retreat • Talent Review • ERM / Market Review Exec. Committee • ERM April March February MOR Draft CI Metrics Webcast Site Capital Growth Projections Due May Mid-year Forecast Due System Initiatives quantified Site Strategic Plan Updates Due 2020 Update Completed June MOR + Health Outcomes MOR Mid-Year Forecast Review QOR MOR QOR December MOR November Board of Directors: • Capital / Operating Budget Approval • KRA Approval Exec. Committee • Succession Mgt Review 14 Governance Process Quarterly Operating Review (QOR) Monthly Operating Review (MOR) Strategic Planning Process Operating Budget Process Capital Budget Process Health Outcomes Planning Process People Process Communication Process Budget Reviews October APP Board Approval of CI Metrics Operating Budgets Due MOR + HR MOR + Health Outcomes September Board of Directors: • Preliminary Budget Outlook • Draft KRAs Sr Leadership Retreat • KRAs Capital Committee Webcast MOR + Strategy QOR QOR: Budget Reviews MOR + Next Year Outlook Talent Board Succession Review Key Leadership LDI July August EMT Retreat • KRAs / STI Draft Health Outcomes KRAs Board Retreat • 2020 Update Budget targets communicated Site Capital Feasibility Studies Due Operating Practices • Performance Management • Management Incentive Plan • Daily Practices • Mid-month Financial Review • Monthly: – Closes – Operating Reviews – Meeting Model 15 Performance Management Structured process and tool to determine level of performance on the Behaviors of Excellence: High Performer, Solid Performer, Low Performer (HSL) Rating on Behaviors of Excellence determines 30% of annual performance rating Annual goal achievement determines 70% of leaders annual performance rating Overall rating (Behaviors and Goal Achievement) a factor in merit increase 16 Management Incentive Plan • Compensation At-Risk • Annual • Determined by Key Results – Health Outcomes – Patient Satisfaction – Operating Margin 17 Daily • Safety Huddle • Productivity Huddle • Leader Rounding 18 Mid-month financial briefing sessions For those sites that are below plan on a year-to-date basis 20 Monthly Closes Distributed to Entire Management Team • Health Outcomes • Patient Satisfaction • Financial 21 March 2015 Advocate Experience – Safety & Quality Close Narrative 22 Monthly Operating Reviews (MORs) • Routine focus on safety, service, and financials • Once /year deep review into health outcomes, strategy(Spring-before budget process is launched), and human resources • Mid-year forecast (July) • Operating budget run rate analysis (December) • Most support functions have Quarterly Operating Reviews (QORs) 23 Vital Statistics 24 Name: Santulli/Deering Date: 3/11/14 – 4 pm Via Telepresence The monthly meeting model provides a framework to review outcome and align focused action plans to achieve goal outcomes and hardwire evidence based leadership practices (EBLs). This preparation facilitates a meaningful dialogue that helps to remove barriers and provide focus. This meeting structure is intended to be utilized on a monthly basis, and can be utilized more frequently as needed. The leader prepares for meeting by 1) reviewing current goals performance and developing action plans to achieve targets, 2) reviewing stoplight reports and tracking logs, 3) report on leadership development, and 4) prepare other pertinent updates. The leader comes prepared to lead the discussion. The one up asks clarifying questions and sets priorities. All KRA areas are listed as the intent is to ensure a balanced review of performance outcomes. The one up and leader can set priority for which goals to review during the meeting based on weighting or results. Review and Bring: Monthy Report Card 90 Day Plans Rounding Logs Stoplight Report Linkage Grid HSL List Wins: Goal Outcomes and Action/90 Day Plan: Review of status of performance goals, plans and monthly report card Are you meeting your target? If so, what will you continue to do to stay on track? If you are not meeting your target, what will you do differently over the next 90 days to meet your target? Project updates and support needed. Safety Quality 1. PG Measurements without reporting for key OP areas Service Growth Funding our Future AdvocateCare System Integration Items Projects/Other Agenda Items 25 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Patient Complaint (Sievertson) Rishi comment 2014 Targets Hospitalists Migration to ACL, wait for Care Conncetion vs. Surginet SWC Strategy MOB Strategy Feedback from payroll (Debbie at Support Center) 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. ALEX concerns Common review date / BOE weight KRA process for matrix leaders Designee to Presidents Meeting Nurse Week gift Alignment Collaborative Center Street and NENA /City Selling properties Conclusions • Every manager must know what winning looks like • Results should determine performance and incentive • Alignment – With Mission/Values/Vision – Vertical • Operating practices and infrastructure need to support accountability 26 QUESTIONS 27
© Copyright 2024