Dolls fi ll MSU Museum’s toy chest

www.MichiganFarmer.com July 2009 / 43
■
Great Lakes Lifestyle
Dolls fill MSU Museum’s toy chest
Editor’s note: This article is part of an ongoing series on the agricultural collections stored by Curator Val Roy Berryman at
the Michigan State University Museum. For more information about the museum, contact Berryman at [email protected] or
517-355-0322. — Jennifer Vincent
By VAL BERRYMAN
L
ast month we looked at early handmade toys for boys. This month we will do the same for the girls. Just as the boys’
playthings helped familiarize them with potential adult jobs and responsibilities, such as farming and national defense, girls were also being trained and indoctrinated into what was seen as their traditional role. The Michigan State
University Museum has a large collection of toys including some homemade toy kitchen utensils, but perhaps more relevant
are the dolls. The nurturing role of women was encouraged in young girls by giving them toy people to take care of, dress
and feed. The earliest dolls were not toy babies; they were small, adult-looking dolls. Dolls that looked like actual babies
came into popularity in the latter part of the 19th century.
COME HERE, ROVER! Keely
Gleespen (in photo below) records the
catalog numbers for homemade rag
dogs. Gleespen is a Central Michigan
University student who hails from
Chelsea and is working at MSU on a
Museum Studies Internship Program
for the summer. Even pets like these
could be quickly produced by a loving
mother reaching into her rag box. The
dogs were made from popular patterns
that were found in late 19th- and early
20th-century women’s magazines. This
playful pup sports a blue neck ribbon
and has black shoe-button eyes —
perhaps making it a good companion
for the doll with the shoe-button eyes
(in photo at left).
DOLL DUO: These two rag dolls have some contrasting features. The one at the
left was almost certainly made by a mother, aunt or grandmother for a small girl.
Although its head is a bit of a flattened lump, it has all of its arms and legs, and its
clothing is quite accurate for the mid-19th century. In addition to the carefully made
dress with decorative trim, it has two undergarments — a quilted slip for warmth
in winter and a pair of long-legged pantaloons. Its face and bangs are penciled on,
but it is unknown how the hair on the back of the head was represented originally
because it is all gone now. The rag doll at right looks like it could have been made
by a child. The head is an even more misshapen lump than the first rag doll, and
the body is simply a larger lump of stuffed fabric. Its only facial features are the two
eyes made from shoe buttons that were probably removed from a child’s outgrown or
worn-out shoe. The dress is a sack that is gathered by a drawstring at the neck and
again around the stubby arms. It’s easy to imagine, however, that those soulful shoebutton eyes returned a lot of love to some young country girl.
DOLLS DERIVED FROM NATURE:
The best commercially manufactured
dolls came from Europe, specifically
Germany and France. They were
also very expensive and not very
many families could afford them. A
long-standing feature of dolls is that
they really don’t have to look or feel
exactly like real humans for youngsters
to cherish them. The first two dolls
shown above could have been made
with small scraps of fabric and natural
materials found on the farm. The larger
doll has a body made from a corncob
wrapped in a white cotton underslip.
Its head is a hickory nut with simple
facial features inked on it. Its crossed
arms are two folded pieces of white
fabric sewn together. The smaller doll is
made of dried corn husks for the body
and clothing. The husks are specially
wrapped and tied with string, and facial
features are again painted or inked on.
The blue pattern of her apron is also
painted.
Good for wallet and waistline
S
AVING money doesn’t have to mean
sacrificing good nutrition. It’s possible to make smart food choices
that save money and bring nutrition to
the table. Here are some tips to help you
make meals that make sense — and save
dollars:
■ Avoid empty-calorie foods that
provide little nutrition. Many designer
drinks and sodas don’t help your wallet
or your waistline. Drinkable yogurts and
flavored milks have nine essential nutrients that help fuel the body.
■ Skip the expensive snack aisles
and focus on convenient snacks that
pay you back, such as yogurt and string
cheese.
■ At 25 cents per serving, milk is one
of the most economical sources of highquality protein and calcium, making it
one of the best beverage bargains in the
supermarket.
■ Cheese has 8 grams of protein per
ounce, and is most cost-effective when
you buy it in block form and shred it
over veggies or use it in casseroles.
For more about how to get the most
out of your meals, visit www.dairymakes
sense.com.
Turkey Tetrazzini
With Cheddar and Parmesan
Nonstick cooking spray
1 package (12 ounces)
whole-wheat penne pasta
2 tablespoons butter
¹⁄₄ cup flour
3 cups low-fat milk
1 cup fat-free low-sodium
chicken broth
¹⁄₂ cup dry white wine
(or more chicken broth)
¹⁄₂ teaspoon pepper
2 cups sliced white
button mushrooms
¹⁄₃ cup grated Parmesan
cheese
2 cups diced cooked
turkey breast
1 cup frozen peas
1 cup shredded reduced-fat
Cheddar cheese
Preheat oven to 350 degrees
F. Spray a shallow 2- to 3-quart baking
dish with cooking spray; set aside. Cook
pasta according to package directions.
In large saucepan over medium heat,
melt butter and stir in flour. Stirring constantly, cook about two minutes. Whisk
in milk, chicken broth, wine and pepper;
bring mixture to a boil. Stir in mushrooms, reduce heat and cook about 10
minutes, stirring frequently, or until mixture thickens and mushrooms are soft.
Stir Parmesan cheese, pasta, turkey
and peas into milk mixture; spoon into
prepared baking dish. Top with Cheddar
cheese and cover the dish loosely with
foil. Bake for about 45 minutes or until
bubbling at edges and heated through.
Makes six servings.