FACT SHEET Turning Crude Glycerin into Polyurethane Foam and Biopolyols

FACT SHEET
Agriculture and Natural Resources
AEX-654-11
Turning Crude Glycerin into Polyurethane
Foam and Biopolyols
Yebo Li, Assistant Professor and Extension Engineer
Randall Reeder, Associate Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer
Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering
The Ohio State University–OARDC
(This fact sheet is based on “Development of Polyurethane Foam and Its Potential within the Biofuels Market”
by Yebo Li, published in Biofuels, July 2011.)
F
armers like biodiesel. It’s a motor fuel made partly
from soybeans or other vegetable oils and it reduces
the demand for imported oil. But there’s a nearly
worthless byproduct of biodiesel production, crude
glycerin, which is a financial and environmental
liability for the biodiesel industry. Crude glycerin
differs significantly from pure glycerin in composition due to the presence of various impurities. Crude
glycerin contains 30–40% glycerin (Ooi, et al. 2001).
Figure 1. Sample of crude glycerin from the
biodiesel process.
At present, crude glycerin is a low-value byproduct
(approximately $0.08/lb) because it contains impurities such as methanol, soap, fatty acid methyl esters,
and salts. Currently, it is not economically viable
to purify crude glycerin to technical grade glycerin
for further applications, and crude glycerin has few
feasible uses in its unpurified form.
As worldwide annual output of biodiesel continues
to grow, the need for technology to develop commercial applications for crude glycerin has become more
pressing. Previous research has concentrated on using
both chemical and biological processes to convert
crude glycerin to value-added products (Pachauri
and He, 2006; Johnson and Taconi, 2007). However,
these technologies only use the glycerin fraction
(30–40% of the crude glycerin) and impurities can
inhibit the microorganisms used in the biological
conversion process. Few of these technologies have
been proven to be economically viable for further
commercialization. Fortunately, new research has
demonstrated the potential for using crude glycerin
as an alternative to petroleum for production of
polyurethane (PU) foam.
Copyright © 2011, The Ohio State University
Turning Crude Glycerin into Polyurethane Foam and Biopolyols—page 2
Petroleum-based polyols and PU foams
Polyurethanes are some of the most versatile
polymers in the world because of the flexibility of
their structural design. Flexible and rigid foams are
two of the most common applications of PU, while
coatings, sealants, elastomers, and adhesives are other
significant applications. Some of the leading uses of
PU foam are found in the automotive, construction,
and insulation industries.
Most people are familiar with PU foam as an
insulating material. However, flexible and rigid PU
foams are also commonly used in the automotive
and construction industries. Polyurethanes have
become some of the most versatile polymers in the
world since they were first developed in 1937. The
global market in 2005 was estimated to be a $30–35
billion industry, with approximately 13.7 million
tons of total production. North America dominated
this production with 3.7 million tons (Petrovic,
2008). This represents a huge potential market for
an agriculture-based replacement.
The current PU industry is heavily petroleum
dependent because the two major raw materials (polyols and isocyanates) are largely petroleum derived
as illustrated in Figure 2. Political instability in the
Middle East and growing worldwide demand are causing the price of petroleum to climb. Not only does this
affect gasoline prices, but PU products also increase in
price. From 2006 to 2008, petroleum-derived polyols
for flexible and rigid foam applications increased
about 18% and 25%, respectively (Omni 2010).
Natural oil and biomass-based polyols
and PU foams
Natural oils, including oil from soybeans, have
favorable characteristics when processed into polyols.
Currently, polyols from natural oil are commercially
available and have prices around $1.25–1.35/lb, which
are close to the prices of petroleum-based polyols at
$0.95–1.45/lb (Omni, 2010). One challenge with natural oil-based polyols is that high-volume production
of natural oil-based polyols would inevitably compete
with food supplies. Therefore, despite the extensive
research and commercialization efforts relating to
development of bio-based polyols or “biopolyols”
from natural oil alternatives, petroleum-based polyols
still dominate the global polyol market.
Biopolyol production from lignocellulosic biomass has also been studied for more than a decade.
Lignocellulosic biomass, such as wood and crop
residues, is composed primarily of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. It is renewable, abundantly
available at low prices, and does not compete directly
with food supplies. The conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biopolyols is typically achieved by
a liquefaction process, during which biopolyols are
produced by a series of solvolysis and hydroxyalkylation reactions. Wheat straw (Chen and Lu, 2009),
distiller’s grain (Yu et al., 2008), and cornstalks (Yan
et al., 2008) have been studied for biopolyol and PU
foam production. The produced biopolyols and PU
foams showed comparable material properties with
those produced from petroleum sources. However,
this process requires
a high-volume of
petroleum-based
solvents, such as
ethylene glycol and
ethylene carbonate,
with approximately
4 pounds of solvent required for
every pound of lignocellulosic biomass
(Hassan and Shukry,
2008). This conFigure 2. Production of petroleum-based polyols from crude oil and natural gas (Omni, 2010).
siderably increases
processing costs and,
Copyright © 2011, The Ohio State University
Turning Crude Glycerin into Polyurethane Foam and Biopolyols—page 3
consequently, hinders future commercialization
efforts. A compelling substitute to natural oil and
petroleum-based feedstocks is crude glycerin.
Crude glycerin-based polyols and PU foams
Yebo Li and his colleagues at The Ohio State
University–OARDC in Wooster have developed a onepot catalytic process that produces a biopolyol from
crude glycerin and lignocellulosic biomass (patentpending) (Figure 3). In this process, the reactor is
loaded with crude glycerin, biomass, and a catalyst
and is heated at atmospheric pressure. During the
reaction process, methanol, which can be reused for
biodiesel production, is recovered with a distillation
system at temperatures of around 100°C. After the
reactor reaches the designated temperature, the crude
glycerin (both glycerin and impurities) reacts with
biomass in the presence of the catalyst to create the
biopolyol. After the reaction, the crude biopolyol is
pumped through a filter to remove impurities and is
ready to be shipped to end-users for the production
of rigid and flexible PU foams and products. The
biopolyol yield ranges from 80 to 95% percent. The
exact yield is affected by the methanol content of crude
glycerin and the ratio of biomass to crude glycerin.
This Ohio State University technology has been
licensed to Poly Green Technologies, LLC, for commercial production of biopolyols from crude glycerin.
Poly Green’s current biopolyol product can be used
Figure 4. Polyurethane samples produced from crude
glycerin and lignocellulosic biomass.
to make rigid foam or blended with petroleum-based
polyols to produce flexible foam.
Factors to be considered
Because crude glycerin is a byproduct of the biodiesel production process, its composition varies
substantially based on the feedstocks and processes
that are used to produce the biodiesel. The inconsistent composition of crude glycerin makes it difficult to produce biopolyols with consistent quality
and performance, creating a major technical barrier
for commercialization. By working to overcome the
inconsistency of crude glycerin-based biopolyols,
Poly Green and its collaborators have the potential
to displace the petroleum domination of the PU
market with a sustainable, environmentally friendly
bio-based polymer material.
The use of crude glycerin
in the production of biopolyols will have two benefits
for biodiesel producers:
eliminating disposal fees
and creating a new revenue
stream. For an industry with
very low profit margins,
this reduction in cost and
increase in revenue will
make the biodiesel industry
more viable.
Figure 3. Process for producing biodiesel, plus polyols from the crude glycerin
by-product.
Copyright © 2011, The Ohio State University
Reviewed by Mary Wicks,
Dr. Harold Keener, and
Lindsay Kilpatrick.
Turning Crude Glycerin into Polyurethane Foam and Biopolyols—page 4
References
Chen, F., and Lu, Z. Liquefaction of wheat straw and
preparation of rigid polyurethane foam from the
liquefaction products. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 111 (1),
508–516 (2009).
Hassan, E. M., and Shukry, N. Polyhydric alcohol
liquefaction of some lignocellulosic agricultural
residues. Ind. Crop Prod. 27, 33–38 (2008).
Johnson, D. T., and Taconi, K. A. The glycerin glut:
Options for the value-added conversion of crude
glycerol resulting from biodiesel production.
Environ. Prog. 26(4), 338–348 (2007).
Li, Y., Zhou, Y., et al. Methods for producing polyols
and polyurethanes. US 2011/0054059 A1 (2009).
Ooi, T. L., Yong, K. C., Dzulkefly, K., Wangyunus,
W. M. Z., and Hazimah, A. H. Crude glycerine
recovery from glycerol residue waste from a palm
kernel oil methyl ester plant. J. Oil Palm Res. 13
(2), 16–22 (2001).
Omni Tech International 2010. A survey of recent
chemical price trends. The potential impact of rising petrochemical prices on soy use for industrial
applications. United Soybean Board. http://www.
omnitechintl.com/pdf/September%202008%20
Price%20Trend%20Study.pdf.
Pachauri, N., and He, B. Value-added utilization of
crude glycerol from biodiesel production: A survey of current research activities. ASABE Meeting
Presentation. Paper Number: 066223 (2006).
Petrovic, Z. Polyurethanes from Vegetable Oils.
Polym. Rev. 48, 109–155 (2008).
Yan Y., Pang, H., Yang, X., Zhang, R., and Liao, B.
Preparation and characterization of water-blown
polyurethane foams from liquefied cornstalk
polyol. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 110, 1099–1111 (2008).
Yu F, Le, Z., Chen P., et al. Atmospheric pressure
liquefaction of dried distillers grains (DDG) and
making polyurethane foams from liquefied DDG.
Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 148, 235–243 (2008).
Visit Ohio State University Extension’s web site “Ohioline” at: http://ohioline.osu.edu
Ohio State University Extension embraces human diversity and is committed to ensuring that all research and related educational
programs are available to clientele on a nondiscriminatory basis without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin,
sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, disability, or veteran status. This statement is in accordance with United States
Civil Rights Laws and the USDA.
Keith L. Smith, Ph.D., Associate Vice President for Agricultural Administration and Director, Ohio State University Extension
TDD No. 800-589-8292 (Ohio only) or 614-292-1868
Copyright © 2011, The Ohio State University