AFRICA - THE RISING CONTINENT; FINANCING BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES Sharing Business Experience Hans Jacob Bull-Berg Director, Project Finance Oslo, March 25, 2015 Sharing Business Experience 2 SN Power Group current locations Norway Philippines Panama Myanmar Laos Zambia Mozambique March 25, 2015 3 Ownership and Balance Sheet Norwegian Government 100 % 100 % Statkraft SN Power established 2003 Agua Imara established 2009 Norfund 50 % SN Power Group reorganized 2014 under one management 50 % SN Power BKK 35.1 % 64.9 % Balance Sheet: MUSD 1,200 Net installed capacity: 500 MW Agua Imara 20% 50 % 50.1 % Laos March 25, 2015 Philippines Panama 51 % Zambia Competitive advantages in low income countries Long-term investment strategy Capitalize on our owners’ technical and financial strength as well as on the Norwegian hydropower tradition Multi-disciplinary project teams with expertise in hydropower, power markets, finance, regulations, environment, legal and social issues Demonstrated ability to execute projects in difficult markets Providing renewable, non-carbon based energy for the future 5 March 25, 2015 7 Agua Imara SSA strategy Country focus – – – Mozambique (rep. office) Uganda Zambia (51% share in LHPC) Project focus – Pursuing good project opportunities in other, selected countries Partner focus – Cooperation strategies towards other hydropower investors in Sub Saharan Africa Preferences – – – March 25, 2015 Mid-size HPPs in the 50 to 300 MW range «Peak» and «shoulder» production pattern Potential for dev. of regional power markets 8 Financing Challenges – The risks Project execution - understanding country risks – Power sector risks – often insufficient national reform 1. Introducing cost reflective tariffs 2. Splitting monopolistic role (grid) from generation and distribution 3. Creating a non-partisan regulator 4. Enabling a commercial and durable deal – Change of law risks 1. Concessions, permits 2. Water management (our resource!!) 3. Environment & Social issues 4. Taxation – Major political risk events, such as 1. WCD (War and Civil Disturbance), 2. Nationalization, 3. Transferability, 4. Breach of Contract March 25, 2015 9 Financing Challenges – The partnerships Project execution - mitigating country risks - partnerships • Local partner • Partnering with local authorities – Legal and economic stabilization – Support mechanisms for publix PPA off-taker, grid provider • Partnering with experienced financial institutions – Multilateral banks – National development banks – Commercial banks • Partnering with able guarantee institutions – Development guar. Institutions – Export Credit Agencies March 25, 2015 10 Who takes the politico/commercial risks? Project execution - identifying counterparty risks – The off-taker of power and grid provider is normally the national power company – often with low credit rating/high risk – Sovereign counter-guaranties seldom obtainable (IMF limitations on HIPC (Heavily Indebted Poor Countries), etc.) … and mitigating them – For the loan financing, financial institutions/DFIs/donor organizations/ECAs will to a large degree have to absorb these risks – The IPP has its own equity at stake, and absorbs the risk for the equity March 25, 2015 11 Conclusions Long term investors in Africa need long term, committed financial institutions on their side: • Understanding our risks • Advising/assisting in structuring marketable financings • Ability to take out the political risks for the commercial banks at: • Acceptable prices, with simpler structures than we know them today leading to: • Lower power prices - increasing the competitive advantage of renewable energy in Sub Saharan Africa March 25, 2015 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION [email protected] +47 952 94 859
© Copyright 2024