International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research. Vol., 4 (2), 127-132, 2015 Available online at http://www.isicenter.org ISSN 2147-3749 ©2015 The Comparison of Team and Individual Male Athletes, Mental Toughness at Different Levels of Skills Samad Biglari1, Afsaneh Sanatkaran2*, Seyyed Mohialdin Bahari3, Mahshad Montazeri4 1 M.Sc in Sport Psychology, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch, Iran Associate, Department of Physical Education and Sport sciences, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch, Iran 3 Associate, Department of Physical Education and Sport sciences, Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch, Iran 4 M.Sc in Sport Psychology, Islamic Azad University 2 * Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Abstract The purpose of this study was the comparison of team and individual male athletes, mental toughness at different levels of skills. The statistical population of present study was team athletes (basketball, handball, and futsal) and individual athletes (karate, wrestling, and taekwondo) of Alborz province at three levels of skill (skilled, semi-skilled, and novice). 180 subjects were selected as statistical sample. The instrument for collecting data is included Golby and Sheard, s the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ) with three subscales: reliability, stability, and control. The analysis of data was done by descriptive statistics and 2 factors ANOVA (p≤0.05). The results of study showed that mental toughness and reliability subscale in team sports is significantly higher than the mental toughness and reliability subscale in individual sports. Also, skilled athletes, reliability was significantly higher than novice athletes, reliability and none of the other subscales had significant relationship with other variables. Keywords: Mental toughness, team sports, individual sports, different levels of skill. Introduction According to sports sciences, experts, there are many factors that affect optimal performance levels and an athlete, s smooth execution. One of these factors is the individual, s mental abilities (Gonzalez, 2006). However there are many mental factors that effect on athletes, performance but mental toughness be considered as one of most important factors. As some of experts believe that at least 50% of the athlete, s mental success is due to mental toughness (Loehr, 1986). Gucciardi (2008) defines that mental toughness is cope and withstand pressures and sports challenges. In fact, the presence of this factor results in a psychology advantage because this factor enables the individuals to better stability, concentration, and self-confidence than their opponent and have a good ability of control and coordination under stressful conditions (Jones et al., 2002). It seems that mental toughness has an intellectual discipline because the person response under pressure and is calm and energetic too. So people with mental toughness can create and reinforce a positive energy in them at critical situations (Loehr, 1986). Mental toughness has three factors: reliability, stability, and control. Reliability factor means the ability of self-esteem and self-confidence especially under stressful conditions and exposure with challenges such as sports competitions. Stability factor means having the courage and athlete, s ability and his/her determination exposure with the needs of training and competition and his/her willingness to take responsibility for training and competition goal setting. The nature of control factor means the individual, s ability in control of conditions too (Jones et al., 2002). The people who believe that they have control over different events in their lives in comparison of other they feel better sense about themselves and they can overcome the difficulties and risks also they can better perform the cognitive tasks (Jones et al., 2002). Therefore, mental toughness helps athletes that they are more focused and more determined than their opponent under pressure and difficult circumstances and also they will show more self-confidence and control (Jones, 1995). The results of studies about the relationship between mental toughness and type of sport on athletes of international, national, provincial, and academic competitions show 127 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4(2), 127-132, 2015 that there is no significant difference between type of sport (team and individual sports, contact and non-contact sports) and mental toughness in athletes (Nicholls et al., 2008). In this regard, Narimani and Ghaffari (2007) compared mental toughness and aggression in martial arts and football players and non-athletes. The results of their study showed that there was a significant difference between athletes and non-athletes in mental skills in favor of athletes. Also there is a positive correlation between mental toughness variable with athletes, age and their history of sport in martial arts and football (Narimani & Ghaffari, 2007). The results of Gordon (2012) showed that there is no difference between team and individual athletes in the mental toughness. A study about the relationship between mental toughness with skill level showed that there is a significant relationship between toughness and athletes, elite level (Golby et al., 2007). The other studies have showed that elite people seek pressure situations and challenges and they have higher mental toughness than semi-professional athletes and non-athletes (Golby et al., 2007; Contrada et al., 1991; Gucciardi, 2011, 2012; Rodewalt & Aguostsdottir, 1984). However, all researches are not confirmed this issue, such as Australian athletes, mental toughness was significantly higher than players in the Australian national team (Coulter et al., 2010). Despite the clear important of mental toughness in athletes, the researches in this area are done about the definition and description of mental skill (Loehr, 1986; Gucciardi et al., 2008; Cabral & Crisfield, 1996; Clough et al., 2002; Fourie & Potgeiter, 2001) and there was a less concentration on relationship between mental toughness and variables such as skill levels. Also the results of these researches are in contradiction with each other (Golby et al., 2007; Contrada et al., 1991; Rodewalt & Aguostsdottir, 1984; Crust & Azadi, 2010). Also, previous studies have not examined the interactive effects of type of sport (individual and team) and skill levels (skilled, semi-skilled, and novice). On the other hand, the information about mental toughness can be an important resource for coaches and athletes due to the more learning about mental toughness as a most important psychological trait in the sporting success and competition results. This is caused athletes, deeper understanding and their athletic abilities, systematic, practical, and continuous evaluation. Thus, according to psychological evaluation, we can use from it as the main part of train planning process and athlete, s goalsetting. Then, we cannot overlook from the important role of this feature in sports talent and mental intervention planning. This is doubly importance for the present study. According to the definitions and the results of existing research (Jones et al., 2002; Golby et al., 2007; Contrada et al., 1991), mental toughness can better determine the individual, s stability than his/her opponent in the concentration, self-confidence, decisiveness, and control of stressful situations. Mental toughness role in sporting success is known for everybody but it is likely that different levels of skill affect the mental toughness and it is be difference between novice, semi-skilled, and skilled athletes. Also it is likely that type of sport (team and individual) or the interaction of both of these factors affect the mental toughness. So, the researcher wants to know in this study that is there difference between team and individual male athletes, mental toughness at different levels of skills or not? Methodology Method The data in this study was collected by field method. Participants The statistical population of this study were male players in team (futsal, handball, and basketball) and individual sports (karate, wrestling, and taekwondo) of Alborz province at three levels of skill (skilled, semi-skilled, and novice). 180 subjects were selected as statistical sample. 180 subjects were selected as statistical sample that numbers of subjects were 30 people in every sport. The numbers of sample population were considered equal to the numbers of statistical population due to the limited numbers of athletes. Instruments and tasks The instruments of this study were the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ) and athletes, individual characteristics questionnaire that was included the questions about athlete, s age, gender, level of education, history of sport, type of sport, and marital status. Golby and Sheard (2010) the Sports Mental Toughness Questionnaire (SMTQ) was included 14 questions and three subscales: reliability, stability, and control. Cronbach, s alpha coefficients of reliability, stability, and control subscale were reported respectively 0.80, 0.74, and 0.71 (Golby et al., 2007). Procedure The researchers referred to the place of trainings in athletes, clubs. They offered two questionnaires to the subjects after they present the information about the purpose, the method of collecting o data, completion of questionnaire, the time of completion and taking subjects, satisfaction. Then, they collected questionnaires after their completion. 128 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4(2), 127-132, 2015 Data Analysis The analysis of data was done by descriptive statistics and 2 Factor (2 type of sport × 3 skill levels) ANOVA (p≤0.05). Results Mental Toughness Mental toughness is shown at skill levels and type of sport (Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4). According to the figures there is an interaction between type of sport (team and individual), skill levels (skilled, semi-skilled, and novice), mental toughness and its subscales (reliability, stability, and control). 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Individual Team Novice Semi-skilled Skilled Skill level Reliability Subscale Figure 1. Mental toughness at skill levels and type of sports. 24 22 Team 20 18 Novice semi-skilled Skilled Skilled Level Stability Subscale Figure 2. The reliability subscale at different levels of skill and type of sport. 15 14.8 14.6 14.4 14.2 14 13.8 13.6 13.4 Team Individual Novice Semi-skilled Skilled Skill Level Figure 3. The stability subscale at different levels of skill and type of sport. 129 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4(2), 127-132, 2015 16 Control Subscale 14 12 10 Team Individ… 8 6 4 2 0 Novice Semi-skilled Skilled Skill Level Figure 4. The control subscale at different levels of skill and type of sport. Table 1. The results of 2 factor (level and type of sport) ANOVA for mental toughness. Variable SS Type of sport Skill level Type of sport and level 220.006 88.90 110.47 df (error) 1 2 2 MS 220.006 44.45 55.23 df (factor) 174 174 174 F Sig. 3.96 0.802 0.996 0.048 0.450 0.371 The results of table 1 showed that there is a significant difference between team (M=51.05) and individual (M=48.84) male athletes, mental toughness (F=3.96, P= 0.048) and there is no significant difference between skilled, semi-skilled, and novice athletes, mental toughness (F=0.802, P=0.450). Also, there is no significant difference between individual and team athletes, mental toughness at skilled, semi-skilled, and novice levels of sports (F=0.996, P=0.371). Table 2. The results of 2 factor (level and type of sport) ANOVA in the reliability subscale. Variable Type of sport Skill level Type of sport and level SS 81.33 93.033 124.21 df (error) 1 2 2 MS 81.33 46.51 62.10 df (factor) 174 174 174 F Sig. 6.39 3.65 4.88 0.012 0.028 0.009 The results of table 2 showed that there is a significant difference between team (M=22.72) and individual (M=21.37) male athletes in the reliability subscale (F=6.39, P= 0.012) and there is a significant difference between skilled, semiskilled, and novice athletes in the reliability subscale (F=03.65, P=0.028). Also there is a significant difference between team and individual athletes, reliability at skilled, semi-skilled, and novice level (F=4.88, P=0.009). Table 3. The results of Tukey test for pairwise comparison of means. Levels Individual – skilled Individual- semi-skilled Individual- novice Team – skilled Team – semi-skilled Team- novice Difference of means 2.6 3.5 0.73 -2.83 -2.40 -3.33 Sig. 0.059 0.900 0.332 0.029 0.101 0.005 The results of Tukey test showed a significant difference between athletes, reliability at skilled (M=23.06) and novice (M=2.53) level (P≤0.05). But there is no significant difference between individual athletes , reliability at skilled and semi-skilled level (P=0.059) and there is a significant difference between team athletes , reliability at skilled (M=23.43) and novice (M=19.86) level (P≤0.05). 130 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4(2), 127-132, 2015 Table 4. The results of 2 factor (level and type of sport) ANOVA in the stability subscale. Variable df (error) 1 2 2 SS Type of sport Skill level Type of sport and level 0.022 10.13 10.97 df (factor) 174 174 174 MS 0.022 5.06 5.48 F sig 0.003 0.656 0.711 0.975 0.520 0.493 The results of table 4 showed that there is no significant difference between team and individual male athletes in the stability subscale (F=0.003, P= 0.975) and there is no significant difference between skilled, semi-skilled, and novice athletes in the stability subscale (F=0.656, P=0.520). Also, there is no significant difference between individual and team athletes, stability at skilled, semi-skilled, and novice levels of sports (F=0.711, P=0.493). Table 5. The results of 2 factor (level and type of sport) ANOVA in the control subscale. Variable Type of sport Skill level Type of sport and level SS 32.08 6.10 34.21 df (error) 1 2 2 MS 32.08 3.05 17.10 df (factor) 174 174 174 F Sig. 2.36 0.225 1.25 0.126 0.799 0.286 The results of table (5) showed that there is no significant difference between team and individual male athletes in the control subscale (F=2.36, P= 0.126) and there is no significant difference between skilled, semi-skilled, and novice athletes in the control subscale (F=0.225, P=0.799). Also, there is no significant difference between individual and team athletes, control at skilled, semi-skilled, and novice levels of sports (F=01.25, P=0.286) Discussion and Conclusion The purpose of this study was the comparison of team and individual male athletes, mental toughness at different levels of skills. The results of study showed that that mental toughness and reliability subscale in team sports was significantly higher than the mental toughness and reliability subscale in individual sports. These differences may be because the nature of team sports causes conditions that team athletes are a highly activist and competitive. Team athletes are very enthusiastic to have a chance for participant in games and competitions so they should be in competition with their teammates moreover their opponents in other teams. These athletes should not surrender against the psychological and physical pressures of competitions and they pursue their goals with a sense of superiority than individual athletes. We can express that the reason of high reliability in team athletes is perhaps due to the conditions of competitions in a team since the reliability subscale is related to the athletes, s ability to remain in a positive manner in the face of challenges and stressful situations such as competitions (Jones et al., 2002). The team athletes, management and resiliency are harder than individual athletes in the mental conditions. We can imply the athletes, stress of a team within them during trainings, their selection and choice during competitions, and the stress related to coordination between them for competitions with rival team from stressful conditions of team sports. In other words, an athlete has more challenges for the management of his/her relationships and emotions in a team and he/she needs more reliability due to the survival of in such a place. The findings of this study are consistent with Narimani and Ghaffari (2007) findings that they stated mental toughness in team sports is higher than in individual sports. But it is conflict with Nicholls et al (2008) and Gordon (2012) findings that their study showed there is no significant relationship between mental toughness and type of sport. Perhaps, lake of consistent of Nicholls, et al and Gordon, s (2012) study with this study is due to type of questionnaire and participants, type of sports. For example in Nicholls, s study was used The Mental Toughness Inventory (MTI) that it is included 67 items and 12 subscales. Because the this study is consistent with an internal study (Narimani & Ghaffari, 2007) and is conflict with two external studies (Nicholls et al., 2008)), it is possible too these conflicting results is due to the different culture between countries that it needs more researches in this regard. According to this study, it was not observed a significant relationship between stability and control variable with skill level and type of sport. The stability factor is related to athlete, s courage and ability in the face of needs of training and competition and the nature of control is related to individual, s ability in control of conditions (Jones et al., 2002). So we can conclude that these two factors in individual and team sports and at different levels of sports are not different from each other in this study. Probably athletes have a considerable extent of stability and control at every level of skills due to the competitive nature of type of sports (basketball, handball, futsal, karate, wrestling, and taekwondo). Overall, the researchers, athletes, coaches, and sport psychologists consider mental toughness as very important psychological factor that athlete close to success and stability by it. When Athletes have mental toughness they practice and compete very hard and they do not surrender under pressure situations. The differences between athletes, mental toughness may be clear through 131 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4(2), 127-132, 2015 athletes, experiences and elite level and type of sports even individual and environmental factors may be share in these differences too. The results of this study show a high level of mental toughness and reliability in skilled and team athletes. It means that team athletes at skilled level have higher mental toughness and reliability than individual athletes at novice level. But there is no significant difference between individual and team athletes, reliability at skilled level (P=0.968). Also there is no significant difference between individual athletes at skilled level and team athletes at semiskilled level (P=0.803) in the reliability subscale and there is no significant difference between individual athletes at skilled level and team athletes at novice level (P=1.000) in the reliability subscale. Furthermore, there is no relationship between athletes, skill and type of sport in control and stability subscale. So the coaches and sport psychologists should present appropriate strategies for increasing of athletes, control and stability regardless of athletes, elite level and type of sports. The appropriate strategies for the increasing of these factors can examine in future researches. References Cabral P, Crisfield P, 1996. Motivation and mental toughness. Leeds: National Coaching Foundation Publications. Clough P, Earle K, Sewell D, 2002. Mental toughness: The concept and its measurement. London: Thomson Publicatons. Contrada RJ, Dimsdale J, Levy L, Weiss T, 1991. Effects of isoproterenol on T-wave amplitude and HR. A dose response study. Psychophysiology. 28: 458-462. Coulter TJ, Mallett CJ, Gucciardi DF, 2010. Understanding mental toughness in Australian soccer: perceptions of players, parents, and coaches. Journal of Sports Sciences. 28(7): 699-716. Crust L, Azadi K, 2010. Mental toughness and athletes' use of psychological strategies. European Journal of Sport Science. 10: 43-51. Fourie S, Potgeiter JR, 2001. The nature of mental toughness in sport. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation. 23: 63-72. Golby J, Sheard M, Van Wersch A, 2007. Evaluating the factor structure of the psychological performance inventory (PPI). Perceptual and Motor Skills. 105: 309-325. Gonzalez D, 2006. The art of mental training-a guide to performance excellence. LA: Sports Psychology Publications. Gordon S, 2012. Strengths-based approaches to developing mental toughness: Team and individual. International Coaching Psychology Review. 7(2): 210-222. Gucciardi DF, 2011. The relationship between developmental experiences and mental toughness in adolescent cricketers. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 33(3): 370-393. Gucciardi DF, 2012. Measuring mental toughness in sport: A psychometric examination of the Psychological Performance Inventory-A and its predecessor. Journal of Personality Assessment. 94: 393-403. Gucciardi DF, Gordon S, Dimmock JA, 2008. Towards an understanding of mental toughness in Australian football. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 20: 261-281. Jones GG, Hanton S, Connaughton D, 2002. What is this thing called mental toughness? An investigation of elite sport performers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 14: 205-218. Jones G, 1995. Psychological preparation in racket sports. London: E and FN Spun Publications. Loehr JE, 1986. Mental toughness training for sports; achieving athletic excellence. Lexington: Stephen Greene Publcations. Narimani M, Ghaffari G, 2007. The comparison of aggression and mental toughness between martial athletes: football players and non-athletes. 6th International Congress on Physical education and Sport Sciences. Nicholls AR, Polman RCJ, Levy AR, Backhouse SH, 2008. Mental toughness, optimism, pessimism, and coping among athletes. Personality and Individual Differences. 44: 1182-1192. Rodewalt F, Aguostsdottir S, 1984. On the relationship of hardiness to the type A behavior pattern: Perception of life events versus coping with life events. Journal of Research in Personality. 18: 212-223. 132
© Copyright 2024