Cooperation between research and industry – a German perspective Arno van Wingerde [email protected] 1 © Fraunhofer A typical conversation between research and industry Scientist Industry 5th A new dimensional , highly non-linear material theory according to [who.ever & some.one.else] using the modified algorithm by now also incorporating time-dependent effects such as…….. Using the rather elegant equation, developed by DTU: It follows that, as can be clearly confirmed by FE analysis, we reduced the error by a full 0.04%! Impressive or what? 2 © Fraunhofer Nice… I guess, Meanwhile I have a real problem: Successful cooperation Most brilliant theories … are not applied because of complexity, poor implementation and documentation Can they be verified? Does the certification body agree? Is there a standard? Offer a solution to today’s problem Industry’s idea of “long-term” is about “one year ahead” Approval of research projects takes often 2 years (in Germany…) Project itself 3-5 years. Meanwhile focus of the industry has shifted completely Start of contacts: use of research facilities for experimental testing Especially if one-of-a-kind and with direct use, for instance accreditation Based on experience gained: more value for industry Contacts developed: further cooperation 3 © Fraunhofer Fraunhofer´s business model: industry focus as success factor 67 Fraunhofer institutes in Germany, Europe’s largest research organization More than 23.000 employees, mainly with natural or engineering science education € 2.0 billion annual research budget 1/3 public basic funding 1/3 third-party grants 1/3 yields from industry orders 4 © Fraunhofer Example: Rotor Blade Requirements Material Costs Labour Costs Interest Charges Depreciation High High Strength strength Other Costs Low Structural Costs Growing Dimensions High Reliability High Numbers Low Weight Low weight Aviation Automotive 6 Wind © Fraunhofer Costs of Bad Quality? Example: rotor blade certification in 4 easy steps (well… from a test institute’s point of view) 1. Establish material properties Static :UTS, UCS, …. R-1: CLD: 2. Design a blade 3. Do a blade test 4. Get your certificate! 7 © Fraunhofer Purpose of blade test (IEC-61400-23) Demonstrate to reasonable level of certainty That specified limit states are not reached blades possess strength and service life provided for in design when manufactured according to certain set of specifications Blade must be shown to withstand both ultimate loads and fatigue loads Full-scale tests are normally tests on limited number of samples Only one or two blades of given design are tested no statistical distribution of production blade strength can be obtained Tests give information valid for blade type No replacement for rigorous design process No replacement for quality system for series blade production 8 © Fraunhofer Full scale blade test 70m Rotor blade test stand Static test 56m blade: Suction side under Pressure Determination of the test loads Medge Without further analysis: IEC: 75% blade width each side GL: 80% Blade width, each side Mload case Mdu Mtarget-u Mloadframes 10 © Fraunhofer 5 years after opening we tested the world’s largest blades From this basis: develop further tests. Elements & Details (bond line, ply drops in spar cap, …) Coupons (consituents, laminae, laminates, core materials, …) Source: IEC 61400-5 (draft version) 11 © Fraunhofer Data Base Sub-Components (spars, shells, root sections, …) Structural Features Nobody home…. Generic Specimen Non-Generic Specimen Increased Complexity Increased number of tests Full Scale Test Blade components Root connections Transition part Buckling panels Trailing edge segments Leading edge segments Chord, Chord-web 12 © Fraunhofer Plydrops Bondlines Spar cap to web bond line component testing Beam cross section 10 mm 30 25 20 15 5.0 2.5 0.0 10 -2.5 5 0 -5.0 50 240 430 630 830 1030 1230 x [mm] Axial stress Shear stress 13 Shear stress [N/mm²] 26 mm Critical Area Axial stress [N/mm²] 97,5 mm 10 mm 32 mm 80 mm s1 ≈ 13 MPa s13 ≈ 2 MPa © Fraunhofer Sub-Component test: Bond lines Transversal cracks (mode I), 10% Nf Cracks extend into laminate Longitudinal crack (mode II), 60-70% Nf “kissing” cracks: ultimate failure Spar Cap 1. Axial Cracks Adhesive Web Spar Cap 2. Start of InterfaceFailure Adhesive Web Spar Cap Adhesive 3. Interface Failure Web 14 © Fraunhofer Outlook: a new design path for rotor blades Create extended standards IEA IEC-61400-5 Rotor blades IEC-61400-23 Testing or rotor blades Close cooperation with certification bodies DNV-GL DEWI-OCC Cooperation with industry Steering committee Cooperation within (inter)national projects EU projects European Energy Research Alliance 16 © Fraunhofer Steering Committee Acknowledgements Fraunhofer IWES is funded by the: Federal State of Bremen Senator für Umwelt, Bau, Verkehr und Europa Senator für Wirtschaft und Häfen Senatorin für Bildung und Wissenschaft Bremerhavener Gesellschaft für Investitions-Förderung und Stadtentwicklung GmbH Federal State of Lower Saxony Federal Republic of Germany Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) with support of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) EUROPEAN UNION Investing in your future European Regional Development Fund Niedersachsen 34 © Fraunhofer THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Any questions? [email protected] 35 © Fraunhofer
© Copyright 2024