THE NEW PARLIAMENT UNDERSTANDING THE NHS CHALLENGE The NHS loomed large in the recent General Election, with all political parties confirming its importance. Nevertheless, the health service faces unprecedented challenges, not just this year but throughout the coming parliament. The new Government needs to make early progress in addressing these challenges, and with that in mind JMC Partners assembled a range of health experts in the months before the Election to discuss what’s required. The breakfast sessions showcased some of the opportunities that exist to transform the way in which healthcare is delivered, using new models of care supported by innovative technologies. However, the first and the last sessions were dominated by the subject of money and the need for substantial additional investment to maintain current services. The new Parliament is therefore likely to face an invidious choice between increasing funding or cutting the NHS coat to fit the available cloth. Efficiencies are to be had and must be secured, but these will not provide a substitute for hard choices. Indeed, in some cases new models of care will throw up hard choices of their own, for example around the sanctity of local hospitals. PRE-ELECTION JMC BREAKFAST EVENTS: TOPIC OVERVIEW money commissioning provision Summaries of each event are provided overleaf MAINTAINING THE NHS: RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE NEW PARLIAMENT n n n n xpectations need to be set: increasing demand for services and limited budget rises mean that it is important to be realistic about what E the NHS can deliver. Even if funding increases in line with current pledges, will the NHS still be able to deliver the services that the public has come to expect? A frank discussion is needed. dditional investment needs to be adequate: polling data from the Health Foundation ahead of the election suggested that 59% of the A public would be willing to pay more taxes to fund the NHS. Should the government consult on how it will raise additional funds for the NHS? The scale of the challenge is clear: to maintain the services we have come to expect, substantial extra funding is required. onger-term budgets are required to drive change: speakers and attendees at the events were unanimous that one year budgets L do not support transformation and are holding back reform. Will the Treasury consider allowing three or five year budgets for the NHS? New models of care will require additional investment and any savings delivered are unlikely to be seen in the short term – a realistic approach is essential. ross-party collaboration is crucial: the NHS must no longer be used as a political football. A grown-up discussion based on facts C will enhance the chances of a sustainable NHS for the future. Politicians across the political spectrum should be prepared to stand up for and be counted on the need for change. money commissioning provision FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSIONING DEVELOPMENTS NHS PROVISION IN NUMBERS n The percentage of NHS trusts and foundation trusts in n Primary care co-commissioning: from 1st April 2015, n The NHS provider sector accounts for £65 billion of the deficit increased from 10% in 2012/13 to 26% in 2013/14 n A £2.1 billion surplus across the NHS in 2012/13 was reduced to £722 million in 2013/14, there is very little leeway remaining when it comes to NHS budgets n Recent reports reveal a £1.6 billion deficit among NHS providers for 2014/15, £750 million of which is a repayable loan from the Department of Health. Predictions for 2015/16 suggest that the overall deficit could reach £2.3 billion SPEAKERS Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Chair, Public Accounts Committee, Richard Murray, Director of Policy, The King’s Fund & Crispin Dowler, Senior Correspondent, Health Service Journal Date: 25th November 2014 KEY TOPICS n The NHS faces significant financial challenges. The £30 billion funding gap and its potential impact on the quality of NHS care is alarming n Evidence suggests that NHS institutions’ financial the majority of CCGs took on fully delegated or joint commissioning responsibility for primary care, designed to allow CCGs to manage local services better n Models of care within the Five Year Forward View: 29 vanguard sites have been identified to take forward the models of care set out in the Forward View, seeking greater integration between primary care, secondary care and community services to support personalised and coordinated health services n Devo Manc: a memorandum of understanding was agreed in February 2015 stating that the £6 billion health budget for Greater Manchester would be devolved to local councils and commissioners, merging health and social care for 2.7 million people. Details about the changes are still emerging and may require new legislation n Specialised services collaborative commissioning: NHS England has proposed much greater collaboration with CCGs on specialised services commissioning. Although it will retain budget and responsibility for specialised services in 2015/16, NHS England has not clarified who will hold responsibility in future position is deteriorating n Financial challenges appear to be having an impact on service delivery and performance against key targets n Five Year Forward View (5YFV) funding scenarios prompted funding pledges from the political parties. However, concerns have been raised that these pledges will not be sufficient, as they rely on the NHS delivering ambitious savings in the face of increasing demand SPEAKERS Dr Amanda Doyle CBE, Chief Clinical Officer, NHS Blackpool CCG and Co-Chair, NHS Clinical Commissioners, Jeremy Taylor, Chief Executive, National Voices & Lord Warner, Chair, Social Care Funding Commission and former Health Minister Date: 14th January 2015 KEY TOPICS n Leadership provided by Simon Stevens within NHS England and by clinical members within CCGs is important to support improvements within the NHS n Preventing overspill from social problems into the health service should be a priority. The £5.8 billion Better Care Fund has positive aspirations to join up services but these may be too ambitious to deliver with the available funds n Formally merging budgets may be dependent on £113 billion NHS budget n There are 244 NHS providers, consisting of 147 Foundation Trusts and 97 NHS Trusts across acute, integrated, specialist, community, mental health and ambulance services n Acute hospital care consumes almost half of the entire NHS budget n 88% of providers opted for NHS England and Monitor’s Enhanced Tariff Option (ETO) following the rejection of the 2015/16 tariff proposals SPEAKERS Bob Bell, Chief Executive, The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Chris Hopson, Chief Executive, NHS Providers & Professor Sir Julian Le Grand, Richard Titmuss Professor of Social Policy, LSE Date: 4th March 2015 KEY TOPICS n Modest increases in funding along with a growing population had meant that spending per person has decreased each year of the last parliament n NHS providers need stability to stop the deterioration of finances and maintain high performance. To do this, clear expectations of the provider sector need to be set n Maintaining high quality services is dependent on achieving the right balance of choice and competition, regulation and patient outcomes assessments n Improving the state of poorly performing institutions is a particular challenge n Transformation is essential but this requires upfront investment to support double running of services. There was scepticism about how the 5YFV aims would be delivered based on current financial projections n Recent tariff negotiations have shown that the obligation on commissioners to manage a balanced budget has a significant impact on NHS providers, pushing even more trusts into the red legislative change, which could further disrupt the health service. Piecemeal change through vanguard sites and “earned autonomy” arrangements is likely to be the preferred route for reform n Poor A&E performance was highlighted as a particular area of concern (a “hot topic” as the event took place at the height of winter pressures) n There was significant support for introducing three to five year budgets to support more strategic commissioning with a greater focus on prevention and transformation JMC Partners is an award-winning policy communications consultancy, with a particular expertise in healthcare. We have a proven record of informing and influencing public policy on behalf of our clients. For more information about our work, please contact [email protected]. These events were held without client sponsorship. A charitable donation was made to the Newman Holiday Trust in lieu of speaker fees. OUR AWARDS Communiqué Awards 2014 Finalist Specialist Consultancy of the Year Communiqué Awards 2013 Winner Small Consultancy of the Year Communiqué Awards 2012 Winner Best Healthcare Policy Programme
© Copyright 2024