C O M P A R I S O N ... TREATMENT OF INAPPROPRIATE SINUS TACHYCARDIA

COMPARISON OF IVABRADINE AND BISOPROLOL IN THE
TREATMENT OF INAPPROPRIATE SINUS TACHYCARDIA
Martino Annamaria,MD; Sette A, MD; Preiti Stella, MD; Rebecchi Marco,MD; de Ruvo
Ermenegildo,MD; Borrelli Alessio,MD; Scarà Antonio,MD; Fagagnini Alessandro,MD; Nuccio
Francesca,MD; Sciarra Luigi,MD; Calo Leonardo,MD, FESC. Department of Cardiology, Policlinic
Casilino, ASL RMB, Rome
Introduction. Beta-blockers are conventionally administered for the treatment of inappropriate sinus
tachycardia (IST), but are often poorly tolerated due to hypotension. Ivabradine has recently
demonstrated to be effective in IST-patients (pts). The aim of our study was to compare ivabradine and
bisoprolol in the treatment of IST.
Methods. After performing an Holter-ECG monitoring and a stress test, consecutive IST-pts were
randomized to treatment with ivabradine, started at a dosage of 5 mg bid, or bisoprolol, at an initial dose
of 1.25 mg/day. After 3 months, pts underwent an Holter-ECG monitoring and a stress test during
treatment.
Results. Overall, 24 IST-pts (mean age 34±12 y; 23 women) symptomatic for palpitations and stress
intolerance, were assigned to ivabradine or bisoprolol (12 pts for both regimens). The two subgroups
were similar for Holter ECG and stress test parameters. The mean dose of ivabradine and bisoprolol
administered were 5±1.3 mg bid and 2±1 mg/day respectively. After 3 months, mean Holter ECG HR
lowered from 92±4.3 to 76±8 bpm with ivabradine (P<0.001) and from 91±5 to 81±12 bpm with
bisoprolol (P=0.006 bisoprolol vs baseline; P=0.02 ivabradine vs bisoprolol). Ivabradine reduced
maximal Holter ECG HR (from 152±16.6 to 128±18 bpm; P<0.001) and maximal HR during stress-test
(from 154±12.5 bpm to 146±15.5 bpm; P=0.044). Conversely bisoprolol caused a non-significant
reduction of maximal HR at Holter ECG and at stress-test. Minimal Holter ECG HR also lowered from
58±9.5 to 52±9 bpm with ivabradine (P=0.039). An increase of at least 50 Watts in the maximal step at
the stress test was observed in 41.7% and 50% of individuals treated with ivabradine and bisoprolol
respectively. Symptoms completely disappeared in the 89.5% and 75% of ivabradine- and
bisoprolol-treated pts respectively. Phosphenes occurred in 5.3% of pts with ivabradine, whilst
bisoprolol leaded to hypotension in 25% of cases.
Conclusions
Ivabradine and bisoprolol were effective in the treatment of IST. Ivabradine determined a better control
of mean and maximal Holter-ECG HR and of maximal HR at stress test, caused a higher improvement
of symptoms and provoked less side effects.