Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Definition of Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD)

Describe why PFD occurs

Discuss appropriate diagnostic testing

Describe treatment options
**Perineal descent of 1-3.5 cm
normal during defecation
Hirschsprungs
Pelvic floor dysfunction
Pelvic organ
prolapse
(anismus, pelvic outlet obstruction, pelvic dyssynergia)
Symptoms
-Constipation
-Digital maneuvers
-Pelvic pain
-Lower back pain
-Fecal incontinence
Associated
conditions
-Interstitial cystitis
-Vulvar vestibulitis
- Parcopresis
-PTSD
-Pelvic surgery
Why do people develop Pelvic
floor dysfunction?
Diagnostic testing for pelvic floor dysfunction
Rectal exam
Assess Pelvic floor
-descent
-relaxation
-spasm
-rectocele
Anorectal
manometry
with balloon
expulsion test
-Can diagnose
Hirschsprungs
disease.
-Pressure
measurement can
diagnose pelvic
outlet obstruction
Sitzmarker
Can help
decipher
between the
three types of
constipation
Defecography
Can diagnose
rectocele,
enterocele,
intussuseption
Pelvic floor dysfunction
Pelvic floor dysfunction with spasm

Surgical treatment
 Partial dissection of the puborectalis
 Anal myomectomy

Pelvic floor rehabilitation
 Pelvic floor physical therapy
 Biofeedback

Valium suppositories

Botox injections to the pelvic floor
BIOFEEDBACK

Teaches patients to
relax their pelvic floor

Use of EMG or pressor
sensors to deliver
feedback

Studies nonstandard
PELVIC FLOOR PHYSICAL THERAPY
Assess your pelvic floor
strength
 Help you to isolate your pelvic
floor muscles
 Utilize biofeedback or muscle
stimulation
 release muscle tension in your
pelvic floor muscles
 suggest behavioral changes


Positive prognostic factors





Hard stool consistency
Greater willingness to participate
Prolonged balloon expulsion time
Shorter duration of laxatives
Negative prognostic factors
 Anal spasm/high anal tone
 History of sexual abuse
Shim L et al.2011. Alim Pharm Therap Leroi
AM et al.1996. Int Jo of Colorectal Disease
Park UC et al.1996. Dis Colon & Rectum
100
90
**
80
70
60
PEG
Biofeedback
50
40
30
20
10
0
Worse
No change
Fair
Major
** Significant difference at 6 months which was sustained for 2 years
Chiarioni et al. Gastroenterol: 2006. 130(3):657-64

Very few trials and each uses different doses
of botox (15 -100 IU) into the puborectalis

Prospective randomized trials for PFD:
 Significant 1 month improvement over
biofeedback
 1 year trend to improvement over biofeedback
 Significantly less effective than partial dissection
of the puborectalis muscle (short and long term)
Farid M et al. 2010:Jo Gastro Surgery
Farid M et al. 2009: Intern Jo of Colorectal surgery

Only 1 randomized prospective trial:
Biofeedback vs valium po vs placebo
 Showed BFB superior to valium or placebo

Diazepam suppositories qhs may be useful
 anal spasm, high anal tone, combined Interstitial
cystitis and failed BFB
 Start 5mg qhs and alternate rectal and vaginally.
Can titrate
Heymen S et al. 2007.Dis of Colon and Rectum
Pelvic floor
dysfunction
improved
Lifestyle adjustments
Continue medical
management
Medical Management
Biofeedback prior to
surgical correction
No improvement
Focused evaluation
Colonic transit study
(Sitz-marker)
PFD
Pelvic floor physical therapy
Anal manometry with
balloon expulsion
Anatomic defect
+ high tone pelvic
floor
Defecography
PFD with
spasm
Pelvic floor physical therapy
botulinum injections
Valium suppositories
Anatomic defect
otherwise normal
pelvic floor
Surgical correction