Download Report

Saxe Middle School Auditorium Renovation
Presentation to the Board of Finance
Tuesday April 14, 2015
DRAFT 4/14/2015
BUILDING CHARGE
•
Saxe Auditorium Building Committee
•
Formed in the summer of 2014
•
Oversee the complete renovation of the Saxe Auditorium
•
10/20 10/29 Report
10/30
11/6
11/20
Voting Members:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Advisory Members (Non-Voting):
11/20 program report
presentation
Penny Rashin (Chair)
Jim Beall (Vice
Chair) 12/4
11/6
Ken Campbell (Secretary)
Nancy Harris
12/15
Molly Ludtke
Amy Murphy Carroll
Alan Sneath
Bill Walbert
Roger Williams
•
•
•
•
12/18
•
12/19
Sangeeta Appel
Hazel Hobbs
Bob Willoughby
Bryan
Luizzi
Design study
presentation
Greg
Macedo
1/14
1/15
1/22
1/19
DRAFT 4/14/2015
2/19
FEASIBILITY STUDY
•
•
•
SLAM CS hired as the Owner’s Rep to do Feasibility and Scope
Study - October 2014
Tighe & Bond hired to do Phase 1 Environmental – December 2014
Building Committee Tours
• Middlebrook MS, Wilton
• Rippowam MS, Stamford
• Bedford MS, Westport
• Scotts Ridge MS, Ridgefield
• Middlesex MS, Darien
• Powerhouse Theatre, New Canaan
DRAFT 4/14/2015
•
Regional Center for the
Arts HS, Trumbull
•
Ridgefield Staples HS,
Westport
•
Trumbull HS
•
Wilton HS
•
New Canaan HS
Auditorium
•
Amity HS, Woodbridge
•
Darien HS, Darien
•
Greenwich HS Space and
Auditorium (Building
Committee only)
EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY
•
764 seat auditorium constructed in 1957
•
58 years old
•
Excluded in 1990s Renovation
•
Current condition summary:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Storage – non-existent
No catwalk system in the attic
No scene shop or changing rooms
Acoustics & sound – severely deficient
Control booth – obsolete
ADA accessibility – non-conforming
Seating – broken and missing
Fly system needs repairs and safety improvements
Lighting – inaccessible, outdated, not energy efficient
HVAC – noisy, inefficient, past its useful life
(currently turned off during performances)
DRAFT 4/14/2015
EXISTING CONDITIONS – AUDITORIUM & SEATING
1. Auditorium Seating
3. Auditorium Seating
DRAFT 4/14/2015
2. Back Wall of Auditorium
4. Auditorium Seating
5. Auditorium Floor
EXISTING CONDITIONS – STAGE AND CONTROL
1. Stage Curtain
3. Upper Control Booth
DRAFT 4/14/2015
2. Upper Control Booth
4. Side Stage Fly Loft Cabling
EXISTING CONDITIONS - STAGE
1. Back of Stage
DRAFT 4/14/2015
2. Back of Stage
3. Fly Loft Rigging
EXISTING CONDITIONS - STAGE
3. Attic Above Ceiling
1. Side Wall of
Auditorium
DRAFT 4/14/2015
2. Auditorium Door
4. Auditorium Aisleway
SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY ASSET
•
Major school and community facility
•
Functions include:
• School Assemblies
• Student town hall meetings
• Rehearsal and Concerts for Band, Choir &
Orchestra
• Theatre – 5th and 6th Grade Musical, 7th and 8th
Grade Musical
• Audio-Visual Lectures and Meetings (PTC,
New Canaan Cares)
• Community Use – Grace Church and outside
Performing Groups rent the space
• Emergency Services
DRAFT 4/14/2015
1997 FLOOR PLAN
DRAFT 4/14/2015
2014 FLOOR PLAN
DRAFT 4/14/2015
Musicals
MUSIC
Lauren Sherwood - Director of
and
Mathew Blank - Stage Manager
Kate Scott - Lighting
Dee Alexander - High School Drama
7th/8th
Chris Coutler - Instrumental
Kate Dorfman - Orchestra/Strings
Sarah Gleason - Choir
Matthew DeMella - Choir/Music Explorations
Benjamin Kibbey - Instrumental
Trevor Leckie - Choir
Janet Rosen - Instrumental
Steven Clapp - Crisis Board Advisory
Mike Handler - Emergency Management Director
DRAFT 4/14/2015
A/V
PARENTS
5th/6th
COMMUNITY
Name
Title
Bryan Luizzi - Superintendent
Greg Macedo - Principal, Saxe Middle School
Alan Sneath - Director of Visual & Performing Arts
Bob Willoughby - Manager of Facilities Operations
Stan Sarafin - Head Custodian, Saxe Middle School
Anthony Medaglia - Saxe MS & HS Auditorium Manager
E.S.
THEATRE
GENERAL
INTERVIEW LIST
Name
Title
Roman Cebulski – TV Studio
Tony Psenicnik – NCHS/Audio Visual
Scott Barnett – IT Manager
Linda Spenard – Grade 7 Administrator
Renee Fill – Saxe PTC President
Katie Owsley – Saxe PTC President
Bob Doran – Career in Theatre and Multimedia
Meg Domino – New Canaan Cares
INTERVIEW RESULTS & FINDINGS
• Good sized auditorium and stage, but needs full renovation
of all systems - lights, sound, HVAC, seats, AV, etc.
• Poor acoustics and sound system are major complaints
• Storage deficiency for risers, acoustic shells, sets, chairs, etc.
• No scene shop and insufficient set/ costume storage
• No practice rooms (1997 practice room used as storage)
• No music office (1997 office used as small instructional
space)
• No dressing rooms
• Existing VPA classrooms are highly utilized
• Instrumental and choral classrooms are undersized
• Storage deficiency for instruments
(west corridor, within rooms)
DRAFT 4/14/2015
EXISTING CONDITIONS
DRAFT 4/14/2015
al
RECOMMENDED SPACE STANDARDS - SDE
CT State Department of Education Space Recommendations - Excerpt
Recommended Max
Number of Pupils
Music: (4)
Vocal
Instrumental
Vocal/Instrumental
--50
50
50
Recommended
Range
Recommended
Max Recommended
RecommendedRange
Range Recommended Range
Sq.Number
Ft./PupilofStation
NetFt./Pupil
Total Sq.Station
Ft.
Pupils
Sq.
Net Total Sq. Ft.
-----20 - 50
24
24 - 50
30
28 - 50
34
Saxe Middle School – SLAM Recommendations:
• Choral:
• Group Performance/ Instrumental Classroom:
DRAFT 4/14/2015
-----100020- 1200
- 24
120024- 1500
- 30
140028- 1700
- 34
25 nsf/ seat
32 nsf/ seat
--1000 - 1200
1200 - 1500
1400 - 1700
FINDINGS – SEAT CAPACITY
• Current spaces undersized for
program needs
nsf/ seat
–
–
–
–
CURRENT USE
OCCUPANCY
(Does Not Meet
Recommended
Space Stds)
DRAFT
CAPACITY OF
CURRENT
SPACE
(Meets
Recommended
4/14/2015Space Stds)
Choral:
Band:
Orchestra:
Classrooms:
12 – 18
17 – 24
14 – 16
26 – 32
• Lack of storage throughout
increases pressure on
instructional spaces due to
perimeter instrument storage
ENROLLMENT & PROGRAM INCREASES SINCE “97 RENO”
•
•
1997 renovation based on enrollment of 1,200
Enrollment increases and program enhancements (since 97 reno.)
• 2014 – 2015 Enrollment = 1,292
2015 – 2016 Enrollment = 1,335
• 2019 – 2020 Enrollment = 1,375 Projected
• 2020 – 2021 Enrollment = 1,409 Projected
• Added programs: Mandarin, STEM Programs, Reading Intervention Lab and
Learning Center
• Floating full time health teacher, part time Spanish teacher
(1.5 Classrooms)
• Forfeiting a faculty dining room (1 Classroom)
• Office to classroom, storage to practice room
Visual & Performing Arts Program
• All students (5th – 8th Grade) are required to take music (choir, band,
orchestra or general music)
• 5th/6th grade musical added. General music expanded to all grades and
music technology added to curriculum
•
•
DRAFT 4/14/2015
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 1
Renovate existing auditorium without adding
any dedicated stage storage
and instructional space.
DRAFT 4/14/2015
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 1
STORAGE
867 SF
DRAFT 4/14/2015
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 1
• Improve acoustic quality and install new sound system
• New energy efficient LED house and stage lighting
• New noise attenuated/ vibration isolated HVAC system
• New light/ sound vestibules at rear
• New seating and required wheelchair seating with accessible route
• New area at rear for sound and lighting control panels
• Improve front stage access and provide flexible seating at center section
• New oversized side stage doors for improved set movement
• New modern playback, recording and A/V systems
DRAFT 4/14/2015
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 1
• Renovate fire alarm and sprinkler systems
• New upper and lower control booth rooms with technology
• New curtains and safety improvements to the rigging and fly system
Option 1 does not address:
• Storage for risers, acoustic shells, sets and chairs (will remain on stage)
• Programmatic deficiencies in the existing performing arts spaces
• Dressing spaces
DRAFT 4/14/2015
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 2
Auditorium renovation as described in Option 1,
plus expansion/renovation of instructional spaces
to be “right-sized” for the existing and
future enrollment and programs.
DRAFT 4/14/2015
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 2*
DRAFT 4/14/2015
*Updated 1/13/15
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 2*
Aud./Stage:
Light Reno:
Heavy Reno:
New Const.:
Total:
8,200
5,000
4,900
6,200
24,300
DRAFT 4/14/2015
*Updated 1/13/15
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 2*
Perf. Group CR (Band):
Band instr. storage:
Perf. Group CR (Choral):
Choral storage:
Perf. Group CR (Orch.):
Orch. instr. storage:
Small Choral CR (153):
General Music CR (155):
Small Band CR (147):
Small Music CR (155A):
General CR:
Practice room(s):
Scene shop/ storage
Stage Storage
Office
STEM:
Art:
TOTAL:
DRAFT 4/14/2015
Existing
1,480
103
1,263
0
910
84
785
683
395
169
0
188
867
0
88
1,019
1,052
9.086
*Updated 1/13/15
Proposed
2,400
400
2,500
160
2,160
400
785
683
395
783
660
240
720
240
162
1,480
910
15,078
New Space (NSF)
Instructional
920
Storage
297
1,237
160
1,250
316
0
0
0
614
660
52
(147)
240
74
461
(142)
5,992
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 2
Perf. Group CR (Band):
Band instr. storage:
Perf. Group CR (Choral):
Choral storage:
Perf. Group CR (Orch.):
Orch. instr. storage:
Small Choral CR (153):
General Music CR (155):
Small Band CR (147):
Small Music CR (155A):
General CR:
*One new and 169
Practice room(s):
Scene shop/ storage
Stage Storage
Office
STEM:
Art:
TOTAL:
Existing
1,480
103
1,263
0
910
84
785
683
395
169
office0replaced
188
867
0
88
1,019
1,052
9.086
• NET INCREASE:
Proposed
2,400
400
2,500
160
2,160
400
785
683
395
783
660
with 780
sf
240
720
240
162
1,480
910
15,078
• INSTRUCTIONAL SPACE (nsf):
• STORAGE SPACE (nsf):
• TEACHING ROOMS*:
sf
New Space (NSF)
Instructional
920
Storage
297
1,237
160
1,250
316
0
0
0
614
660
52
(147)
240
74
461
(142)
5,992
5,142
850
+2
room
• “RIGHT-SIZED” GROUP PERFORMANCE SPACES
DRAFT 4/14/2015
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 2
• Auditorium renovations as noted in Option 1
• Addition to south (~6,200 GSF) to facilitate new performing
group classroom space general classrooms and storage
(including approx. 18,100 of renovations)
• Alleviates current pressure on instructional spaces to meet
current and future student enrollment
• Dedicated instrument storage for Orchestra and Band
• Maintain existing small and general music classrooms
• Add two medium sized classrooms
• Move STEM and Art rooms to existing Orchestra & Band
• Dedicated scene/storage space adjacent to back stage
• Program improvements and opportunities
• New classrooms used for dressing rooms as needed
Does not address all of the storage, dressing room and scene shop spaces.
DRAFT 4/14/2015
OPTION 2 – SEAT CAPACITY
• Provides needed
relief to currently
overcrowded
spaces and
provides capacity
for future enrollment
• Dedicated storage
throughout reduces
pressure on
instructional spaces
and makes stage
available
CAPACITY OF
CURRENT
SPACE
(Meets
Recommended
Space Stds)
DRAFT 4/14/2015
CAPACITY OF
PROPOSED
SPACE
(Meets
Recommended
Space Stds)
Project Scope - Option 3 Feasibility Study
•
Option 3 scope includes:
•
•
•
Complete renovation of the Auditorium
Modification of Option 2 that decreases classroom additions in the
music wing and adds classrooms in the northwest region of Saxe to
address current and projected enrollment needs.
The Feasibility Study will:
•
•
•
•
Inventory existing space at Saxe and benchmark against similar
facilities
Analyze the need for academic spaces to meet current and
projected enrollment at Saxe
Development of conceptual floor plan(s) for an addition to address
identified space needs
Provide a high level cost estimate for Option 3 conceptual plan(s)
DRAFT 4/14/2015
Option 3 Feasibility Study – Project Scope
•
Option 3 scope includes:
•
•
•
Complete renovation of the Auditorium
Modification of Option 2 that decreases classroom additions in the
music wing and adds classrooms in the northwest region of Saxe to
address current and projected enrollment needs.
The Feasibility Study will:
•
•
•
•
Inventory existing space at Saxe and benchmark against similar
facilities
Analyze the need for academic spaces to meet current and
projected enrollment at Saxe
Development of conceptual floor plan(s) for an addition to address
identified space needs
Provide a high level cost estimate for Option 3 conceptual plan(s)
DRAFT 4/14/2015
2
Option 3 Feasibility Study – Process
•
Performed the following tasks:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Classroom count
Room area take-off
Analyzed the capacity of existing rooms in context of recommended
area/ seat to arrive at recommended room capacity
Analyzed classroom count scenarios using enrollment projections
Analyzed room utilization based on 2014/15 master schedule
Coordinated with Saxe administration to determine other current
and future programs with space demand
DRAFT 4/14/2015
3
Existing Conditions – Space Pressures – Lower Level
Undersized science room
6
6
6
6
Science
6
6
Science
5-8
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
SPED
6
6
6
6
Science
6
5-8
•
•
•
6
Science
SPED
5
Science
5
6
Loss of two team rooms to special ed resource rooms
Loss of science storage to special ed hearing room
Curriculum director’s offices relegated to the basement storage area
DRAFT 4/14/2015
4
Existing Conditions – Space Pressures – Main Level – East
Undersized science room
7
7
Science
7
5
7
Science
5
Science
5
5
5
5
5
5
5-8
5
5
5
5
5
5-8 Health
7
Science
Science
7
7
7
7
6-8
6-8
6-8
6-8
6-8
2015/16
6-8
•
•
•
•
•
6-8
6-8
6-8
Loss of team room to special ed resource room
Loss of science storage as special ed. Assistive Technology
Loss of special ed. classroom to health classroom
Loss of faculty dining room to science room
DRAFT 4/1/2015
DRAFT
4/14/2015
Planned
conversion of language lab to classroom
5
Existing Conditions – Space Pressures – Main Level – West
5-8
2017/18
5-8
5
7
7
7
5-8
8
7
8
7
5-8
8
Science
Science
8
8
8
5-8
5-8
8
No Storage
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Loss of team room to
special ed.
Loss of special ed. to CR
6-7
Use of corridor alcove as special ed. area
DRAFT 4/1/2015
Loss of storage rooms for curriculum director offices
Loss of faculty work room to special ed resource room
Loss of fitness room to special ed.
Loss of conference and office space to undersized music classrooms
Loss of practice room to storage
• Planned
conversion to CR
DRAFT
4/14/2015
Undersized
music group performance classrooms
6
Existing Conditions – Space Pressures – Upper Level
5-8
2017/18
2015/16
Undersized
science room
8
7
8
Science
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Science
5-8
•
•
•
•
8
Science
8
DRAFT 4/1/2015
Loss of team room to special ed.
Loss of special ed. to classroom
Use of corridor alcove as special ed. area
Planned conversion of computer labs to classrooms
DRAFT 4/14/2015
7
Gr. 5 Summary – Existing Conditions
General findings:
5th Grade Academic Classroom Summary
5th Grade:
Classrooms
Science
Total
14
3
17
•
•
•
5th grade classrooms are approximately 660
nsf and can support 21seats* and can flex
to 22.
Academic classrooms are utilized 75-88%,
based on teacher planning periods taking
place in classrooms
5th grade science rooms range in size from
850 – 975 nsf and can support 21-24
seats**.
Exceptions:
•
Room 124 can support 27 seats*
* 32 nsf/seat
** 41 nsf/seat
DRAFT 4/14/2015
8
5th Grade Classrooms – Analysis
•
22 seats per room
Total 5th enrollment: 370 (2017/18); 353 (2019/20): 355 (2020/21)
•
Total need of 16 general classrooms
•
* Enrollment exceeds capacity by 18, distribute over 16 classrooms
Direct Calculations: 22 Seats per Classroom
school
year
Option 2: 17 Classrooms (22 seats/ CR)
5th Grade
school
year
5th Grade
# students
min # cr
avg cl size
# Rms
enrollment
capacity
# students
min # cr
avg cl size
# Rms
enrollment
capacity
2014-2015
304
14
21.71
14
304
308
2014-2015
304
14
21.71
14
304
308
2015-2016
348
16
21.75
16
348
352
2015-2016
348
17
20.47
17
348
374
2016-2017
320
15
21.33
15
320
330
2016-2017
320
17
18.82
17
320
374
2017-2018
370
17
21.76
17
370
374
2017-2018
370
17
21.76
17
370
374
2018-2019
318
15
21.20
15
318
330
2018-2019
318
17
18.71
17
318
374
2019-2020
353
17
20.76
17
353
374
2019-2020
353
17
20.76
17
353
374
2020-2021
355
17
20.88
17
355
374
2020-2021
355
17
20.88
17
355
374
Option 1: 16 Classrooms (22 seats/ CR)
school
year
Option 3: 18 Classrooms (22 seats/ CR)
5th Grade
school
# students
min # cr
avg cl size
# Rms
enrollment
capacity
2014-2015
304
14
21.71
14
304
308
2015-2016
348
16
21.75
16
348
2016-2017
320
16
20.00
16
320
2017-2018
370
16
23.13
16
2018-2019
318
16
19.88
2019-2020
353
16
2020-2021
355
16
5th Grade
# students
min # cr
avg cl size
# Rms
enrollment
capacity
2014-2015
304
14
21.71
14
304
308
352
2015-2016
348
18
19.33
18
348
396
352
2016-2017
320
18
17.78
18
320
396
370
352
2017-2018
370
18
20.56
18
370
396
16
318
352
2018-2019
318
18
17.67
18
318
396
22.06
16
353
352
2019-2020
353
18
19.61
18
353
396
22.19
16
355
352
2020-2021
355
18
19.72
18
355
396
DRAFT 4/14/2015
year
*
9
5th Grade Classrooms – Recommendations
Academic classrooms:
•
Saxe MS should have a minimum of 16 academic classrooms at the 5th
grade level.
•
•
Will address the projected enrollment and maintain class size at 20-22
students.
Will allow the administration to accommodate future enrollment without
overbuilding
Science classrooms:
•
•
Based on original ed spec and discussion with administrators, 41 nsf/
seat is appropriate for sciences at Saxe. 22 x 41 = 902 nsf
Saxe MS should have a minimum of 3 science classrooms at the 5th
grade level.
•
Will address the projected enrollment and maintain class size at 20-22
seats.
Total of 19 academic rooms
DRAFT 4/14/2015
10
Gr. 6, 7 & 8 Summary – Existing Conditions
General findings:
6,7,8 Grade Academic Classroom Summary
Ex isting Conditions
6th Grade:
Classrooms
Science
12
4
7th Grade:
10
4
8th Grade:
12
4
6-8 Shared:
11
Total
45
Exceptions:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Total
•
6-8 classrooms are approximately 660 – 740
nsf, can support 21 – 23 seats* and flex to
25.
Academic classrooms are utilized 75-88%,
based on teacher planning periods and team
meetings taking place in classrooms.
•
12
57
Usage: 5/8 student; 2/8 teacher/team; 1/8
lunch
•
6-8 science rooms are approximately 660 –
860 nsf and most can support 20-21seats**
•
Currently operating at 30 – 39 nsf/seat***.
Classroom 024 supports 27 seats*
Classroom 145 supports 18 seats*
Classroom 119 supports 29 seats*
Science classroom 027 supports 16
seats**
Science classrooms 132 and 208
support 18 seats**
DRAFT 4/14/2015 * 32 nsf/seat ** 41 nsf/seat
*** 22 seats/room
11
Gr. 6, 7 & 8 Classrooms – Analysis – 2020/2021 Enrollment
• 22 seats per Room
• Total 6-8 enrollment: 1,054: 6th – 358; 7th – 325; 8th – 371
• 75% room utilization assumed to permit flexibility with
breakout sections
• Demand for 65 classrooms; 13 of which are science CR’s
projected
students per
subject
sessions per
total
periods per
utilization
total rooms
total rooms
NSF per
NSF per
total area
total seat
subject
class size
sections
week
sessions
week
target
required
required
seat
classroom
required
capacity
Language Arts
1054
22
48
5
240
25
75%
12.78
13
32.00
704
8,994
286
Math
1054
22
48
5
240
25
75%
12.78
13
32.00
704
8,994
286
Social Studies
1054
22
48
5
240
25
75%
12.78
13
32.00
704
8,994
286
Science
1054
22
48
5
240
25
75%
12.78
13
55.00
1,210
15,459
286
1,144
World Languages
1000
22
DRAFT 4/14/2015
45
5
227
25
75%
12.12
13
32.00
704
8,533
286
Total Academic Classrooms:
52
Total Science Classrooms:
13
Enrollment:
1,054
Seat Utilization (just in academic space) :
109%
12
Gr. 6, 7 & 8 Classrooms – Analysis – 2017/2018 Enrollment
• 22 seats per Room
• Total 6-8 enrollment: 985: 6th – 325; 7th – 356; 8th – 304
• 75% room utilization assumed to permit flexibility with
breakout sections
• Demand for 60 classrooms; 12 of which are science CR’s
projected
students per
subject
sessions per
total
periods per
utilization
total rooms
total rooms
NSF per
NSF per
total area
total seat
subject
class size
sections
week
sessions
week
target
required
required
seat
classroom
required
capacity
Language Arts
985
22
45
5
224
25
75%
11.94
12
32.00
704
8,405
264
Math
985
22
45
5
224
25
75%
11.94
12
32.00
704
8,405
264
Social Studies
985
22
45
5
224
25
75%
11.94
12
32.00
704
8,405
264
Science
985
22
45
5
224
25
75%
11.94
12
55.00
1,210
14,447
264
1,056
World Languages
934
22
DRAFT 4/14/2015
42
5
212
25
75%
11.32
12
32.00
704
7,970
264
Total Academic Classrooms:
48
Total Science Classrooms:
12
Enrollment:
985
Seat Utilization (just in academic space) :
107%
13
Gr. 6, 7 & 8 Summary – Analysis & Recommendations
6,7,8 Grade Academic Classroom Summary
Ex isting Conditions
Classrooms
Science
6th Grade:
12
7th Grade:
Analy sis 2017/ 18 Enrollment
Total
Classrooms
Science
4
12
10
4
8th Grade:
12
4
6-8 Shared:
11
Total
45
Total
Classrooms
Science
4
13
4
12
4
13
5
12
4
13
4
12
12 *
57
Analy sis 2020/ 21 Enrollment
48
Total
13
12
60
52
13
65
Recommendations:
•
50 classrooms (+5 from existing)
•
12 each per grade = 36
•
2 shared general classrooms for all of 6-8
12 World Language
•
•
•
12 science classrooms (+0 from existing)
Total of 62 academic rooms
* three existing science rooms are undersized, refer to existing conditions summary
DRAFT 4/14/2015
14
Special Education & Faculty Support – Findings
Special Education:
•
Many existing special ed rooms are converted from alternate uses
(i.e. team rooms)
•
Many of the spaces currently used for special ed. are
inappropriate space:
•
•
•
Corridor alcove, lack of privacy, poor acoustics, distractions
Natural light levels inappropriate to effectively use technology
Room aspect ratio (long & narrow) not conducive to use
Faculty Support:
•
No team rooms (6 rooms consumed for special ed)
•
No faculty dining room (consumed for science room)
•
Curriculum director offices located in basement
DRAFT 4/14/2015
15
Summary of Recommendations
Grade 5 classrooms:
•
•
Addition of two (2) classrooms at 700 – 770 nsf
Addition of one (1) science room at 900 nsf to permit the shifting of science
room assignments and reclaim the faculty dining space
Grade 6, 7 & 8 classrooms:
•
Addition of five (5) classrooms at 700 – 770 nsf
Special Education:
•
Addition of four (4) special education resource rooms sized as classrooms
(700 – 770 nsf) to permit the conversion of existing classrooms to special
ed. dispersed across the existing floor plate
Faculty Support:
•
•
Reclaim faculty dining space (currently serving as a 5th grade science CR)
Reclaim four (4) team rooms (currently serving as special education
resource rooms)
DRAFT 4/14/2015
16
Summary of Recommendations
Performing Arts spaces:
•
Add:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Repurpose:
•
•
•
•
•
One (1) group performance classroom (choral) at 2,500 nsf
One (1) group performance classroom (band) at 2,400 nsf
One (1) band storage room at 400 nsf
One (1) chair storage room at 150 nsf (choral)
One (1) scene storage at 720 nsf
One (1) stage storage at 500 nsf
Three (3) practice rooms at 80 nsf
One (1) office at 162 nsf
Existing band room as group performance classroom (orchestra)
Band storage room for orchestra storage
Existing orchestra room as art room, displaced by south addition
Existing practice room for storage
Existing spaces to remain “as-is”:
Small band room (147)
• Small choral (153)
• General Music (155)
DRAFT 4/14/2015
•
•
•
•
Existing scene shop (across from ceramics)
Costume storage in lower level
STEM room
17
PROJECT SCOPE – OPTION 3
Under Development
DRAFT 4/14/2015
Opinion of Probable Costs
DRAFT 4/14/2015
FEASIBILITY STUDY ESTIMATES – OPTION 1
Budgets do not include any cost associated with the design, monitoring and
removal of Hazardous Materials (separate funding)
Trade Cost
Builder’s Fees
Theatre Equipment
Professional Fees
Owner’s Contingency
$0
•
•
•
•
•
$2,017,000
$5,308,000
DRAFT 4/14/2015
Demo
Concrete
Catwalk & stairs
Millwork
Flooring
•
•
•
•
Light vest.
OH drs
New lighting
HVAC
$1,022,000
•
•
•
Stage Rigging/Draperies •
Theatre Lighting/Sound •
Audio/Visual
•
$841,000
•
•
•
•
General Insurance
• Builder’s OH&P Fee
State of CT Education Fee
General Conditions/Reimbur/Staffing Costs
Escalation – Today to Summer 2016
$566,000
•
•
•
A/E Design Fees
•
Consultant Fees
•
Testing/Inspection Cost
$862,000
•
•
•
•
Owner’s Contingency
Estimating Margin on Accuracy
Unanticipated Design Scope
WMBE Participation
Demountable Stage
Auditorium Topping Slab
Auditorium Seating
Preconstruction Fees
O. R . fee
FEASIBILITY STUDY ESTIMATES – OPTION 2
Budget is based on auditorium work (option 1) running concurrently with option 2
Trade Cost
Owner’s Contingency
Builder’s Fees
Option 1
Professional Fees
$3,204,000
Option 1 Scope +
• Additions and renovations of classrooms
• Minor upgrades to the existing 1997
spaces
$0
$533,000
$292,000
$795,000
$10,132,000
DRAFT 4/14/2015
$5,308,000
Option 1 Scope +
• General Insurance
• State of CT Education Fee
• General Conditions/Reimbur/Staffing Costs
• Escalation – Today to Summer 2016
• Builder’s OH&P Fee
• Bonds
Option 1 Scope +
• A/E Design Fees
• Consultant Fees
• Testing & Inspection Cost
• Preconstruction fees
Option 1 Scope +
• Owner’s Contingency •
• Estimating Margin on
•
Accuracy
Option 1 cost
Unanticipated Design
Scope
WMBE Participation
FEASIBILITY STUDY ESTIMATES – SUMMARY
Auditorium Only
$5,308,000
Auditorium + VPA Classroom
$10,132,000
Auditorium + VPA Classroom
(As Separate Projects)
$11,808,000
*If the classroom wing is constructed
AUDITORIUM ONLY
$5,308,000
separately from the auditorium
renovation, the cost premium (versus
doing it as one project) will be approx.
$ 1,676,000
AUDITORIUM + VPA CLASSROOM
$10,132,000
VPA CLASSROOM ADDITION ONLY
$6,500,000
DRAFT 4/14/2015
9 Months
11 Months
*
20 Months
FEASIBILITY STUDY ESTIMATES – OPTION 3
Under Development
DRAFT 4/14/2015
SUMMARY
•
Option 1: Provides a fully renovated and up to date auditorium, but does not
address the lack of storage and classroom deficiencies.
•
•
Project estimate: 5.3 Million
Option 2: Provides renovated, fully functional, up to date auditorium and addresses
the initial feasibility study findings regarding the need for auditorium storage and right
sized music classrooms. It also provides 2 general purpose classrooms, but it does
not address the larger need for general classrooms due to enrollment increases.
•
•
Project estimate: 10.1 Million
Option 3: Under development; will fully renovate the auditorium, provide
needed auditorium related storage, right sized music classroom spaces and will
provide general classroom space in northwest part of building to meet all needs due
to enrollment increases.
•
Project estimate: TBD
DRAFT 4/14/2015